Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Part 3 Finale: Exclusive with James Comer-ALL the Evidence of Joe Biden's Corruption

Transcript

Part 3 Finale: Exclusive with James Comer-ALL the Evidence of Joe Biden's Corruption · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: Part three of our exclusive sit down with James Comer
0:04
Speaker 1: about the financial crimes that have been committed by the
0:07
Speaker 1: Biden crime family. And this part, Part three is really
0:11
Speaker 1: interesting because we get into where the money was coming
0:14
Speaker 1: from and the questions that the president may be forced
0:18
Speaker 1: to answer. Finally, here is that Part three, and don't
0:21
Speaker 1: forget if you miss part one or part two. Makes
0:24
Speaker 1: you go back and listen to that and share this
0:26
Speaker 1: on social media wherever you are.
0:28
Speaker 2: So let me ask you something. When Usupoene and Hunter,
0:32
Speaker 2: he came back and said he was willing to testify,
0:34
Speaker 2: but only only in an open hearing, not in a
0:37
Speaker 2: closed door deposition. Tell us from your perspective, what the
0:40
Speaker 2: advantages are of doing a closed door deposition first before
0:45
Speaker 2: open public testimony.
0:46
Speaker 3: We have tens of thousands of pages of documents, bank statements, emails,
0:51
Speaker 3: sworn testimony. We have hundreds and hundreds of questions. You know,
0:56
Speaker 3: probably close to a thousand questions. In a deposition, you
1:00
Speaker 3: have one hour. The Republicans have an hour, than the
1:02
Speaker 3: Democrats have an hour. Then you come back and have
1:04
Speaker 3: another hour. The Democrats have another hour. So you know,
1:07
Speaker 3: easily you can get an eight hour deposition in in
1:10
Speaker 3: a day, whereas we would have four hours, the staff
1:13
Speaker 3: would generally be the ones that would which I have.
1:16
Speaker 3: You know, my lead deposer was the lead deposer at
1:20
Speaker 3: the Department of Justice in the in the Trump administration
1:23
Speaker 3: under Bill bark So we've got the you know, really
1:26
Speaker 3: good people that are really good at this, and Judiciary
1:29
Speaker 3: does too.
1:30
Speaker 4: Jim has good people there. They were both going to
1:32
Speaker 4: be in there.
1:33
Speaker 3: We were going to ask them specific questions, hundreds of questions.
1:37
Speaker 3: If you have a committee hearing where you have twenty
1:40
Speaker 3: five Republicans and twenty one Democrats going back and forth, yelling.
1:44
Speaker 3: The Democrats at the last year and they filed three
1:47
Speaker 3: motions to adjourn during the committee here in trying to
1:50
Speaker 3: disrupt it.
1:51
Speaker 4: You get five minutes each back and forth.
1:54
Speaker 3: We might get forty forty five questions in So it's
1:58
Speaker 3: a difference of forty or forty five have questions in
2:01
Speaker 3: a complete chaotic pop scene versus a sit down, substantive
2:07
Speaker 3: deposition where we could easily ask eight hundred questions.
2:10
Speaker 4: This is too important.
2:12
Speaker 3: This is an investigation of public corruption at the highest levels.
2:15
Speaker 3: This has been a substantive, credible investigation that we've accumulated
2:19
Speaker 3: mountains of evidence through bank records and emails. We have
2:22
Speaker 3: lots of questions. You just can't get that into a
2:25
Speaker 3: public hearing. But I want to have a public hearing
2:27
Speaker 3: with Hunter Biden, and we will have a hearing with
2:30
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden after he gets deposed.
2:32
Speaker 2: For what it's worth, James, and this is something that
2:34
Speaker 2: I've talked about on Verdict recently. Look, you're in the
2:37
Speaker 2: middle of the fight. You're working your tail off with
2:40
Speaker 2: a lot of complicated stuff. I understand everything you said there,
2:44
Speaker 2: and I agree there's a lot of force to the
2:46
Speaker 2: argument you're putting forward to the extent I can share
2:50
Speaker 2: some unsolicited advice, which I did in our last podcast,
2:53
Speaker 2: and you know I'm a lawyer and a senator, so
2:55
Speaker 2: I'm in the business to give it unsolicited advice. But
3:00
Speaker 2: I would encourage y'all to go ahead and have him
3:03
Speaker 2: in a public hearing anyway. And I understand why it
3:05
Speaker 2: would be better to depose him, but from their perspective,
3:10
Speaker 2: they can litigate and fight this contempt for the rest
3:14
Speaker 2: of the year and run out the clock, and that's
3:16
Speaker 2: what they want to do. And I know you know
3:19
Speaker 2: this very directly, but just I want to remind our listeners.
3:23
Speaker 2: This is ultimately about Joe Biden, not about Hunter Biden.
3:27
Speaker 2: And although the questions won't be as detailed, there won't
3:30
Speaker 2: be as much time in a public hearing getting Hunter publicly.
3:34
Speaker 2: He claims he will do it, and I would also
3:37
Speaker 2: encourage and I don't know the House rules the mechanics
3:40
Speaker 2: for doing this, but to the extent you can, I
3:43
Speaker 2: would encourage you if you do a public hearing with
3:45
Speaker 2: Hunter instead of doing five minute rounds, do ten minute
3:49
Speaker 2: Roundsate in the Senate and the Judiciary Committee, we often
3:53
Speaker 2: do seven minute rounds or ten minute rounds. For a
3:55
Speaker 2: Supreme Court nominee, we do thirty minute rounds. The difference
3:59
Speaker 2: is as examiner, of what you can get in a
4:02
Speaker 2: ten minute round versus a five minute round is night
4:06
Speaker 2: and day, and so so I would just I think
4:10
Speaker 2: the value if we could get Hunter to testify in January,
4:15
Speaker 2: and if your team could work with your down DIAS
4:20
Speaker 2: members to have all, right, here are all the questions
4:22
Speaker 2: we need to get. Can you take this module? You
4:25
Speaker 2: take this module? So you know, sometimes you and I
4:27
Speaker 2: both know their hearings where you have members, they all
4:30
Speaker 2: do their own thing, and they're all running around like
4:32
Speaker 2: crazy for something like this, to the extent the down
4:36
Speaker 2: Dias Republicans each can take a particular issue and say,
4:40
Speaker 2: all right, I'm going to take my five or even
4:42
Speaker 2: better ten minutes and ask the questions. Would it be
4:46
Speaker 2: as good as a deposition? No, but I think the
4:49
Speaker 2: value of doing that publicly if Hunter would answer those questions,
4:54
Speaker 2: the legal jeopardy for Joe would be massive from that,
4:59
Speaker 2: and I think that outweighs the strategic benefit of waiting
5:03
Speaker 2: for the closed door deposition. So consider that I don't
5:06
Speaker 2: need an answer from you now, but that you know, look,
5:09
Speaker 2: I've litigated a lot of cases, and that would be
5:12
Speaker 2: my pretty emphatic advice is that don't let the perfect
5:17
Speaker 2: be the enemy of the good, because getting Hunter on
5:20
Speaker 2: the record in public on all the questions that we've
5:23
Speaker 2: been talking about, that is enormously valuable. And I don't
5:27
Speaker 2: want to see the clock run out, particularly if look,
5:30
Speaker 2: you and I are both hoping there's a good election
5:33
Speaker 2: in November, but it could be a bad election. And
5:36
Speaker 2: if in November the speaker is a Keem Jeffries, your
5:39
Speaker 2: committee's going away and they're in the deposition, they're into
5:43
Speaker 2: public hearing, and it's all over, so we can hope
5:48
Speaker 2: we have a good election. But I think it's it's
5:50
Speaker 2: wise to assume that your clock may be at most
5:55
Speaker 2: eleven months.
5:57
Speaker 4: Agree or lest Yeah, I appreciate that.
6:01
Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you are sick and tired
6:04
Speaker 1: of feeling like you've gotten a little bit older, maybe
6:07
Speaker 1: you feel like weakness and complacency have set in, You're
6:10
Speaker 1: not alone. Testosterum levels have literally fallen off a cliff historically,
6:16
Speaker 1: and they're now at an all time low.
6:18
Speaker 5: Now.
6:18
Speaker 1: Thankfully, the patriots at Chalk are here to help real
6:22
Speaker 1: men just like you, take back your right to proudly
6:26
Speaker 1: maximize your masculinity by boosting testosteron levels up to twenty
6:30
Speaker 1: percent over ninety days. Yes, twenty percent over ninety days.
6:35
Speaker 4: Now.
6:35
Speaker 1: I've been taking the Male Vitality Stack and it's manufactured
6:39
Speaker 1: right here in the US of A. Chalk's natural herbal
6:42
Speaker 1: supplements are clinically proven to have game changing effects on
6:46
Speaker 1: your energy, your focus, and your mood. So if you're
6:50
Speaker 1: ready to fight back and not give in to the
6:53
Speaker 1: weakness that everybody seems to be obsessed with, then check
6:56
Speaker 1: out Chalk choq dot com. Boost you testosterrom mobs up
7:01
Speaker 1: to twenty percent over ninety days. Go online to choq
7:06
Speaker 1: dot com. That's choq dot com, check out the mail
7:10
Speaker 1: Vitality stack and use the promo code Ben for thirty
7:15
Speaker 1: five percent off. That's right, you'll say thirty five percent
7:18
Speaker 1: off right now for life at chalk choq dot com
7:24
Speaker 1: promo code Ben. Let me ask you this question too,
7:28
Speaker 1: is we kind of put a rap on this? I
7:31
Speaker 1: want to play Hunter Biden. Yeah, and I want to
7:33
Speaker 1: play what he said because I don't know, if you know,
7:36
Speaker 1: a lot of people thought the White House is probably
7:38
Speaker 1: give me advice. I think there seems to be a
7:40
Speaker 1: little bit of a riff now between the White House.
7:42
Speaker 1: We're seeing some weeks coming out. They didn't like what
7:44
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden did at this press conference, and that means
7:48
Speaker 1: he's kind of a rogue actor in this scenario. Right now,
7:51
Speaker 1: I want to get your reaction to just as demeanor
7:53
Speaker 1: and what he said.
7:54
Speaker 6: Take a look.
7:55
Speaker 5: Let me state as clearly as I can, my father
7:59
Speaker 5: was not financially involved in my business, not as a
8:03
Speaker 5: practicing lawyer, not as a board member of Barisma, not
8:07
Speaker 5: in my partnership with a Chinese private businessman, not in
8:11
Speaker 5: my investments at home, nor abroad, and certainly not as
8:14
Speaker 5: an artist. During my battle with addiction, my parents were
8:19
Speaker 5: there for me. They literally saved my life. They helped
8:24
Speaker 5: me in ways that I will never be able to repay,
8:28
Speaker 5: and of course they would never expect me to. And
8:31
Speaker 5: in the depths of my addiction, I was extremely irresponsible
8:34
Speaker 5: with my finances, but to suggest that as grounds for
8:38
Speaker 5: an impeacement inquiry is beyond the absurd.
8:41
Speaker 6: It's shameless.
8:44
Speaker 5: There is no evidence to support the allegations that my
8:47
Speaker 5: father was financially involved in my business because it did
8:51
Speaker 5: not happen. James Comer, Jim Jordan, Jason Smith, and their
9:02
Speaker 5: colleagues have distorted the facts by cherry picking lines from
9:07
Speaker 5: a bank statement, manipulating texts I sent, editing the testimony
9:12
Speaker 5: of my friends and former business partners, and misstating personal
9:17
Speaker 5: information that was stolen from me.
9:19
Speaker 1: He accuses you of manipulating text messages without any evidence
9:24
Speaker 1: and says that you guys are cherry picking lines.
9:26
Speaker 6: I gotta get your response to that.
9:29
Speaker 3: I've never seen such a display of arrogance and entitlement
9:32
Speaker 3: in my life, but I'm not surprised because look, he's
9:35
Speaker 3: gotten away with this for years.
9:37
Speaker 4: Because he's a Biden. The rules don't apply to the Bidens.
9:39
Speaker 4: But I don't know how you manipulate a text.
9:43
Speaker 3: Was his father beside him when he was extorting that
9:46
Speaker 3: Chinese national or not?
9:47
Speaker 4: That's a simple question. The media should have asked the
9:50
Speaker 4: in and there.
9:51
Speaker 1: And they stopped the GPS, right, they stopped the GPS.
9:54
Speaker 6: You and I have talked about this here. We could
9:56
Speaker 6: have answered that.
9:57
Speaker 2: Question, okay, And it's important. Look, this is there's a
10:00
Speaker 2: reason people hate lawyers. I listened to that as a lawyer.
10:05
Speaker 2: When they say manipulating a text, what they mean is
10:10
Speaker 2: one of the copies that was released of the WhatsApp
10:13
Speaker 2: text from one of the House members, they put a
10:16
Speaker 2: Chinese flag next to the Chinese person speaking to identify them,
10:21
Speaker 2: So like, aha, you manipulated it, because in the real
10:23
Speaker 2: one there's not a Chinese flag, so it's true. For
10:26
Speaker 2: purposes of display, they added a Chinese flag to demonstrate
10:30
Speaker 2: that that was a Chinese person. When they say manipulated,
10:34
Speaker 2: what they don't mean. What Hunter has never said, what
10:37
Speaker 2: his lawyers have never said, is that one word of
10:40
Speaker 2: that text is inaccurate. What they have never said is
10:43
Speaker 2: I did not send that and we talked about on Verdict.
10:46
Speaker 2: One possible defense he could have is Nope, that text
10:50
Speaker 2: is fake. I never sent it. Now that's a defense
10:52
Speaker 2: you can make, but then you've got to prove it.
10:54
Speaker 2: The fact that they haven't said that much like like
10:57
Speaker 2: Sherlock Holmes and the dog that didn't bark, The fact
11:02
Speaker 2: that they didn't say that tells you that they are
11:06
Speaker 2: implicitly admitting it is accurate. We also know that DOJ
11:12
Speaker 2: prevented any search of GPS data would be very easy
11:16
Speaker 2: to determine where was Hunter's cell phone at the moment
11:19
Speaker 2: that text was being sent, Where was Joe's cell phone?
11:22
Speaker 2: Were they in the same room where they sitting next
11:24
Speaker 2: to each other. The Biden Department of Justice does not
11:27
Speaker 2: want anyone to know the answer to that, and so
11:30
Speaker 2: they blocked that. But by the way, that text is
11:33
Speaker 2: direct evidence. So and next time you hear a Democrat
11:37
Speaker 2: or their shills in the media saying there's no direct
11:39
Speaker 2: evidence of Joe Biden's involvement, understand that WhatsApp text is
11:44
Speaker 2: direct evidence. It's not circumstantial. It is written testimony from
11:49
Speaker 2: Hunter about Joe's involvement in the shakedown. And I got
11:53
Speaker 2: to say by the way Ben I noticed something, So James.
11:56
Speaker 2: In our last podcast, we held the New York Times
12:00
Speaker 2: to task because they took Hunter Biden's quote at the
12:04
Speaker 2: press conference that my father was not financially involved with
12:09
Speaker 2: my business and they misquoted it to say my father
12:14
Speaker 2: was not involved in my business. They deleted the word
12:18
Speaker 2: financially and that was I believe, a very deliberate deletion.
12:23
Speaker 4: Absolutely.
12:24
Speaker 2: Well, what's interesting, I just discovered something again. Let me
12:27
Speaker 2: ask the team put up the very last shot from
12:30
Speaker 2: the Hunter Biden video that we were watching, if we
12:32
Speaker 2: can put it on the screen now. If you notice
12:36
Speaker 2: CN end did the same damn thing. Yeah, look at
12:38
Speaker 2: the chiron in the bottom. Hunter Biden, my father was
12:42
Speaker 2: not involved in any of my businesses. What he said
12:45
Speaker 2: was my father was not financially involved in any of
12:49
Speaker 2: my businesses. CNN and New York Times both deleted the
12:53
Speaker 2: same word. By the way, they know how to quote
12:56
Speaker 2: what he said. Often a chiron will be Hunter Biden
12:58
Speaker 2: quote quote my father was not financially involved in any
13:02
Speaker 2: of my businesses. But understand, CNN is on team Biden,
13:06
Speaker 2: they're on team Hunter, they're on team Joe. And it
13:09
Speaker 2: reminds me of the famous CNN chirron of the reporter
13:15
Speaker 2: saying fiery but peaceful protest as a building is on
13:19
Speaker 2: fire with a Black Lives Matter an ANTIFA protest going on,
13:23
Speaker 2: CNN is happily editing out Hunter's comments to benefit the
13:27
Speaker 2: White House.
13:28
Speaker 1: For more than ten years, Patriot Mobile has been America's
13:31
Speaker 1: only Christian conservative wireless provider. They stand behind their values
13:36
Speaker 1: and they stand behind exceptional service. They're an example of
13:40
Speaker 1: putting the cause a head of profit, and that is
13:43
Speaker 1: why I am proud to partner with him. Patriot Mobile
13:46
Speaker 1: is extending their Black Friday deal with the Every Friday
13:49
Speaker 1: Matters deal, and you can get a free smartphone when
13:54
Speaker 1: you switch today. Patriot Mobile offers dependable nationwide coverage, giving
13:58
Speaker 1: you access to all three major networks, which means you
14:02
Speaker 1: get the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding
14:07
Speaker 1: the radical left. Now, when you switch to Patriot Mobile,
14:10
Speaker 1: you're supporting free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life,
14:14
Speaker 1: are veterans and first responders, and more than just that.
14:17
Speaker 1: They are actually a one hundred percent US based company
14:21
Speaker 1: with customer service teams that make switching easy so you
14:25
Speaker 1: can keep your same number you have right now you
14:27
Speaker 1: can keep your existing phone or for a limited time
14:30
Speaker 1: get a free smartphone from Patriot Mobile. Go to Patriot
14:34
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson or call them nine seven
14:37
Speaker 1: to two Patriot. Use the promo code Friday seven to six.
14:42
Speaker 1: That's Friday seven six. Again, get a free smartphone with
14:45
Speaker 1: promo code Friday seven to six. That's the limited time offer.
14:48
Speaker 1: Join me make the switch today at Patriot Mobile dot
14:51
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson
14:55
Speaker 1: or nine to seven to two Patriot. Let me ask
14:58
Speaker 1: you one other question about this that I think is
15:00
Speaker 1: also very important, and that is to remind people financially. Now,
15:06
Speaker 1: how many countries was the Biden crime family getting money from.
15:10
Speaker 6: We haven't even mentioned in the last hour. Romania. That's
15:14
Speaker 6: a country that has to be brought up.
15:16
Speaker 1: But you guys are finding more money in more places
15:20
Speaker 1: with more people, and even Hunter Biden there in what
15:23
Speaker 1: he said, he said with my foreign business dealings plural,
15:27
Speaker 1: he was admitting, Yeah, I'm getting money from everywhere in
15:29
Speaker 1: the world.
15:30
Speaker 3: Yeah, we know I got money from China, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Uzbekistan.
15:39
Speaker 3: We know that he was paid through China for stuff
15:42
Speaker 3: he did in the Congo. We know that Jim Biden
15:46
Speaker 3: operated primarily in the Middle East, so pretty much every
15:51
Speaker 3: bad country in the world is where the Bidens would
15:54
Speaker 3: target their influence peddling schemes.
15:57
Speaker 1: Do you expect to get anything new about James Biden's money.
16:01
Speaker 1: I mean, we obviously know a lot about Hunters, but
16:03
Speaker 1: are you guys finding more and more of James, Because
16:06
Speaker 1: before Hunter Biden was of age, James was the bat,
16:10
Speaker 1: was the bag man, and then it kind of turned into, oh, hey,
16:13
Speaker 1: we've got a kid here that we can get to
16:14
Speaker 1: be the bag man, and we have an excuse for
16:16
Speaker 1: his actions that he's a drug addict, which is exactly
16:19
Speaker 1: what Hunter Biden said in that video. I was in
16:21
Speaker 1: the depths of addiction. You should feel sorry for me.
16:23
Speaker 1: I had just seen the money from anybody. James Biden
16:26
Speaker 1: seems to be smarter and have done this for decades,
16:30
Speaker 1: while Hunter's kind of the pupil under him.
16:33
Speaker 3: Yeah, we have a lot of questions for for James Biden. Again,
16:37
Speaker 3: the reason no one knows much about him is he
16:40
Speaker 3: didn't leave a laptop lying around, but having looked at
16:44
Speaker 3: his bank records from his LLC and from his personal
16:49
Speaker 3: bank records. I have a lot of questions for James Biden.
16:53
Speaker 2: He's then appear that that James, Joe's brother, was as
16:58
Speaker 2: involved in this family business as Hunter was, or would
17:01
Speaker 2: you say they're they're equally complicit.
17:04
Speaker 4: I wouldn't say he's as involved.
17:06
Speaker 3: But a lot of transactions in and out of James
17:10
Speaker 3: Biden's LLC were with the Biden shell companies, and then
17:16
Speaker 3: obviously the two hundred and forty thousand dollars that came
17:19
Speaker 3: from Hunter's shell companies went through James Biden's personal account
17:26
Speaker 3: and had him write the money to Joe Biden.
17:30
Speaker 4: I think at the end of the day, when.
17:31
Speaker 3: Joe Biden was saying, oh, there's not a shred of evidence,
17:34
Speaker 3: not shred of evidence, they thought that we would try
17:37
Speaker 3: to get their taxes. And I never wanted their taxes.
17:40
Speaker 3: I wanted their bank records. I've looked at enough tax returns.
17:43
Speaker 3: As the director of a bank, you want to look
17:45
Speaker 3: at the bank statements. Bank statements don't lie, and you
17:49
Speaker 3: would have never seen that money to Joe.
17:51
Speaker 4: You would never.
17:52
Speaker 3: See any of these these millions of dollars they're labeling
17:55
Speaker 3: as loans.
17:56
Speaker 4: If you had just subpoena the tax records. You had
17:59
Speaker 4: to get the bank.
18:00
Speaker 2: And to be clear, the two hundred thousand dollars payment
18:04
Speaker 2: that went from from Jim to Joe that they claim
18:10
Speaker 2: was a loan repayment, there is zero evidence, or to
18:13
Speaker 2: use Joe's phrase, not a scentilla of evidence, that that
18:16
Speaker 2: was actually a loan that had ever gone from Joe
18:20
Speaker 2: to Jim in the first place. In other words, there
18:21
Speaker 2: has to be a loan in order for a loan
18:23
Speaker 2: to be repaid. Is there any evidence at all that
18:26
Speaker 2: that loan existed.
18:28
Speaker 3: No, it's not hard to prove alone. If you paid
18:31
Speaker 3: me back one hundred thousand dollars, then I should have
18:35
Speaker 3: a check to you for one hundred thousand dollars at
18:37
Speaker 3: some point before you paid me back one hundred thous dollars.
18:40
Speaker 3: That's pretty simple, and I think every American, even the
18:43
Speaker 3: financially illiterate ones, understand that.
18:45
Speaker 2: All Right, two more questions I want to get to,
18:48
Speaker 2: what do you make of the fact that the countries
18:50
Speaker 2: that are doing business with Hunter and Jim Biden are
18:55
Speaker 2: all countries that are shady, that have corrupt oligarchs that
18:58
Speaker 2: are to various degrees enemies of America that they don't
19:02
Speaker 2: They don't do business with any of our close allies.
19:04
Speaker 2: You don't see them doing business with England. You don't
19:06
Speaker 2: see them doing business with France or Germany. You don't
19:09
Speaker 2: see them doing business with Japan. You don't see them
19:11
Speaker 2: doing business with Canada. I mean, there are lots of
19:14
Speaker 2: countries where people can do business with them, where it's
19:17
Speaker 2: not necessarily shady. You go out of your way to
19:20
Speaker 2: find places like Russia and China. That says something. What
19:24
Speaker 2: do you make of that?
19:25
Speaker 3: I think that was their business model. We know they
19:29
Speaker 3: sold the Biden brand, but where did you sell the
19:31
Speaker 3: Biden brand? You sold the Biden brand in shady countries.
19:35
Speaker 3: You revolved the business model around people who were in trouble. Barisma,
19:42
Speaker 3: the Romanian foreign national, the Russian oligarch.
19:46
Speaker 4: China was always.
19:47
Speaker 3: In trouble because no one wants them in the United States.
19:50
Speaker 3: We don't want China buying farmland. We don't want China
19:52
Speaker 3: buying our energy companies. But they use the Bidens to
19:56
Speaker 3: try to get their foot in the door everywhere they operated.
20:00
Speaker 3: We're in countries where we have problems with bad people
20:05
Speaker 3: from bad countries.
20:06
Speaker 2: All right, Last question something Hunter mentions at the end
20:11
Speaker 2: of that press conference that's kind of gratuitously tossed on there.
20:15
Speaker 2: He says, Dad wasn't involved in Bearisma and my legal
20:19
Speaker 2: practice such as it was, and my businesses, and then
20:22
Speaker 2: he says or with me as an artist, and it
20:26
Speaker 2: kind of pops out of nowhere there. What do you
20:29
Speaker 2: make of that and what is your take on quote
20:33
Speaker 2: Hunter as an artist?
20:35
Speaker 3: Well, Hunter was never an artist until Joe became president.
20:39
Speaker 3: And it looks like their business model changed. From twenty
20:43
Speaker 3: fourteen to twenty eighteen. They were taking wires directly through
20:48
Speaker 3: those show companies. Then the ir ashrals in on them.
20:50
Speaker 3: Then they start trying to say this money they were
20:53
Speaker 3: taken in from influence pending, we're loans. Then once Joe
20:56
Speaker 3: become president, they stopped all of that and Hunter started
21:01
Speaker 3: selling art. So I believe the influence pedling may still
21:06
Speaker 3: be going on. It's going on through the art sales.
21:09
Speaker 3: We need to know who's purchasing this artwork.
21:12
Speaker 4: That's why do we know that.
21:14
Speaker 6: Do we know who's purchasing the artwork and how much
21:16
Speaker 6: they're paying.
21:17
Speaker 3: We think we know of two people and they're part
21:20
Speaker 3: of the people we're trying to bring in to ask
21:23
Speaker 3: questions or to the post. So that's something every American
21:27
Speaker 3: should want to know.
21:27
Speaker 4: Who's behind this artwork.
21:29
Speaker 1: Let me tell you about Blackout Coffee. Bidenomics is a
21:31
Speaker 1: complete until disaster. But I don't let that or any
21:35
Speaker 1: of these other issues ruin my day. You want to
21:38
Speaker 1: know why, because I start my day with a hot
21:40
Speaker 1: America first cup of Blackout coffee. Now, if you like
21:44
Speaker 1: a premium cup of coffee to start your day. And
21:46
Speaker 1: I got to get up every day and get on
21:47
Speaker 1: the radio at seven in the morning. I have to
21:50
Speaker 1: be ready to give the news. And that is why
21:53
Speaker 1: I have to have a good cup of coffee, not average,
21:55
Speaker 1: but a really good cup of coffee. Blackout Coffee is
21:59
Speaker 1: one hundred percent of America zero percent woke company. You
22:02
Speaker 1: know there's a bunch of woke coffee companies out there.
22:04
Speaker 1: The biggest ones are the wokest ones out there. Well,
22:06
Speaker 1: Blackout as one hundred percent committed to conservative values from
22:09
Speaker 1: sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping.
22:13
Speaker 1: They embody true American values and accept no compromise on
22:17
Speaker 1: taste or quality. I'm drinking it every day. I can
22:19
Speaker 1: tell you this is true. You need to try Blackout Coffee.
22:22
Speaker 1: And if you've got someone on your Christmas list as
22:24
Speaker 1: a coffee drinker that loves premium coffee, go to Blackoutcoffee
22:29
Speaker 1: dot com slash verdict. That's Blackout Coffee dot com slash verdict.
22:35
Speaker 1: You'll use the promo code Verdict and you're gonna get
22:37
Speaker 1: twenty percent off your first order, plus you can see
22:40
Speaker 1: all their incredible gift ideas for the holidays. It's Blackout
22:43
Speaker 1: Coffee dot com slash vertict.
22:45
Speaker 6: Be awake, not woke.
22:47
Speaker 1: Blackoutcoffee dot com slash vertict. So even with the investigation
22:51
Speaker 1: going on, and this is just to make it clear
22:54
Speaker 1: the American people where we are now, there's no reason
22:56
Speaker 1: to believe that the Biden said okay, they're onto us,
22:59
Speaker 1: let's shut it down. They just said, okay, they're on
23:01
Speaker 1: to us, let's change the way that we're operating our business.
23:05
Speaker 1: We found out, for example, that the first American hostage
23:08
Speaker 1: that was released from Hamas was had a family member
23:10
Speaker 1: who had bought artwork from Hunter Biden is another example
23:15
Speaker 1: of still now this is going on in real time.
23:18
Speaker 2: So do we have evidence, do we know how many
23:22
Speaker 2: paintings Hunter has sold to whom and for how much?
23:27
Speaker 2: Those are basic questions. Since Joe became president, do we
23:31
Speaker 2: know whether he sold one painting, fifty paintings, or one
23:35
Speaker 2: hundred paintings.
23:36
Speaker 3: We know he sold several. They bragged about it. The
23:39
Speaker 3: art director, George Burgess, he's one.
23:42
Speaker 4: Of the people we expected to pose. Hopefully in January,
23:45
Speaker 4: we'll ask those questions.
23:46
Speaker 1: And has any of Hunter Biden's art ever hung in
23:49
Speaker 1: any government buildings or the White House? That would, in theory,
23:53
Speaker 1: raise the price of that artwork, the value of that artwork,
23:56
Speaker 1: because we know that artwork where it hangs can increase
24:00
Speaker 1: us to value significantly.
24:02
Speaker 3: I don't know that that'll be a great question. We
24:03
Speaker 3: can ask George purchase.
24:05
Speaker 2: But the point you made that there's no evidence Hunter
24:09
Speaker 2: was an artist until daddy became president is rather amazing.
24:16
Speaker 2: Every artist I've ever known, they've been an artist their
24:18
Speaker 2: whole life. They've been painting. Usually people have been painting
24:21
Speaker 2: since they were kids. If you want to be a
24:23
Speaker 2: commercial artist, most people don't start off saying I'm gonna
24:26
Speaker 2: paint something and sell it for half million dollars. Is
24:30
Speaker 2: the Biden family blocking your committee getting the information on
24:34
Speaker 2: how many paintings have been sold to whom and for
24:36
Speaker 2: how much?
24:37
Speaker 3: Well, somebody's blocking it again, that's the question.
24:40
Speaker 4: We're going to ask the art gallery owner.
24:43
Speaker 3: And we're going to ask Kevin Morris, who's the Hollywood
24:45
Speaker 3: attorney and we believe he has a lot of inside
24:49
Speaker 3: knowledge over this artwork and who's purchasing the artwork.
24:52
Speaker 2: This would be the Hollywood attorney that paid off Hunter's
24:54
Speaker 2: back taxes.
24:55
Speaker 3: Yeah, the media reports that he's paid hundred two and
25:01
Speaker 3: a half million dollars, but it's five million dollars. It's
25:04
Speaker 3: five million dollars from this Hollywood attorney he never met
25:08
Speaker 3: until Joe was the nominee to be president.
25:12
Speaker 2: He never met the guy.
25:14
Speaker 3: Never met the guy we had the picture when the
25:17
Speaker 3: first time they met.
25:18
Speaker 4: It was at a political fundraiser.
25:20
Speaker 3: So this guy didn't grow up with, wasn't friends with
25:23
Speaker 3: like Devon arger Boba, Linzcury, these.
25:26
Speaker 4: Guys, and he met this guy.
25:28
Speaker 3: Now this guy has loaned him five million dollars.
25:31
Speaker 6: At least don't have to put that on your taxes.
25:33
Speaker 6: I guess that's the purpose.
25:34
Speaker 2: I tell you this. This is James, thank you. This
25:37
Speaker 2: has been very helpful and I want us to close.
25:42
Speaker 2: We've heard mountains and mountains of evidence of corruption, mountains
25:45
Speaker 2: of evidence of corruption of Hunter Biden, mountains of evidence
25:49
Speaker 2: of corruption of Jim Biden, mountains of evidence of corruption
25:52
Speaker 2: of Joe Biden. I want us to close with Kareeine
25:55
Speaker 2: John Pierre claiming there is no evidence. So just give
25:58
Speaker 2: a listen to what the White House House is saying,
26:01
Speaker 2: and then we're going to look at the newspaper headlines
26:04
Speaker 2: that have followed.
26:05
Speaker 7: What we're seeing from House Republican is wasted time and
26:08
Speaker 7: it is certainly, you know, baseless political stunt. That's what
26:13
Speaker 7: we're seeing. And they're leaving. House Republicans are leaving this
26:16
Speaker 7: week to go, you know, enjoy a nice holiday, right
26:20
Speaker 7: as most Americans should. But what happened to the funding
26:24
Speaker 7: to Ukraine? Just asked me about Ukraine. They haven't been
26:26
Speaker 7: able to get that done. They haven't been able to
26:29
Speaker 7: fix help let's fix what's going on at the border.
26:31
Speaker 7: They haven't been able to get that done. They haven't
26:33
Speaker 7: been able to start a conversation on how we're going
26:35
Speaker 7: to avert a shutdown in January. They haven't been able
26:39
Speaker 7: to do that. And so look, you know, there's been
26:41
Speaker 7: zero evidence, zero evidence. You can ask me about engagement
26:45
Speaker 7: and what the president has done with his family and conversation,
26:48
Speaker 7: but there's no evidence. There's wait, wait, but there's no evidence.
26:52
Speaker 7: There is no evidence that the president has done wrongdoing.
26:55
Speaker 7: There's none, absolutely none, none, And that is just a fact.
27:01
Speaker 7: You've heard it from Republicans themselves. So they're wasting their
27:05
Speaker 7: time instead of doing the work on behalf of the
27:08
Speaker 7: American people, they go after the president's family. But that's a.
27:13
Speaker 4: Waste of time.
27:14
Speaker 2: Every time she says no evidence, no evidence, no evidence,
27:17
Speaker 2: it's a lie. But here take a look at how
27:19
Speaker 2: Reuter's reported the House vote on impeachment Biden impeachment inquiry
27:23
Speaker 2: authorized by House Republicans COMMA despite lack of evidence. Mind you,
27:28
Speaker 2: this is news. Next headline, New York Times. House approves
27:34
Speaker 2: Biden impeachment inquiry as GOP hunts foreign offense. Republicans are
27:39
Speaker 2: pushing forward with a former investigation even though their year
27:42
Speaker 2: long scrutiny of the president and his family has turned
27:45
Speaker 2: up no evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors. That is
27:49
Speaker 2: complete bs by the way. Washington Post next headline, Washington
27:53
Speaker 2: Post still lacking evidence. House GOP votes to formalize biden
27:59
Speaker 2: impeachment inquiry. Lawmakers have said the step will put them
28:02
Speaker 2: on a stronger legal footing for any court challenges related
28:05
Speaker 2: to their investigations. Understand Reuters, The New York Times, The
28:10
Speaker 2: Washington Post, and Karine Jean Pierre on behalf of the
28:13
Speaker 2: president are lying, and James, thank you for joining us,
28:17
Speaker 2: because you have laid out an enormous amount of evidence
28:20
Speaker 2: that apparently you don't exist. The House doesn't exist, the
28:24
Speaker 2: investigation doesn't exist, the bank records don't exist, the WhatsApp
28:28
Speaker 2: doesn't exist, Barisma doesn't exist. Twenty four million dollars doesn't exist.
28:32
Speaker 2: Two hundred and forty thousand dollars to Joe Biden doesn't exist.
28:35
Speaker 2: None of that exists because we're told there's no evidence.
28:38
Speaker 2: These are lying shills, but the truth will out. Thank
28:42
Speaker 2: you for all you're doing, and James, have a merry Christmas.
28:46
Speaker 6: Congressman again, thank you so much for joining us. Senator.
28:50
Speaker 1: This is such an important conversation, obviously, and I will
28:53
Speaker 1: say to everyone that's listening or if you're watching, if
28:56
Speaker 1: you miss part one or part two of this three
28:59
Speaker 1: part series, would you, James Comer, make sure you go
29:01
Speaker 1: back and listen, but also make sure that you help
29:04
Speaker 1: us get the word out. Whether you're on Facebook or
29:07
Speaker 1: on YouTube or on x you can grab the video
29:09
Speaker 1: and watch. You can share the video there and also
29:13
Speaker 1: share the podcast links to part one, Part two, part three.
29:16
Speaker 1: Because without you the Verdict listeners, this show doesn't happen.
29:21
Speaker 1: And when you share it on social media you bring
29:23
Speaker 1: so many others into the conversation and allow them to
29:26
Speaker 1: hear the facts of what the mainstream media is not covering.
29:29
Speaker 1: I'll say it again, thank you to James Comer and
29:31
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan for all their hard work and we hope
29:34
Speaker 1: you enjoyed everything that we talked about the Senator and
29:37
Speaker 1: I will see you back here in a couple of days.