Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / NY Goes Banana Republic in Trump Conviction

Transcript

NY Goes Banana Republic in Trump Conviction · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: So let me start by saying, yes, if you are
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: angry over what you saw that happened to Donald Trump
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: today in New York, you should be angry. Are we
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: living in the bananak public based on what's happening week
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: after week right now against former President Donald Trump? I
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: think the answer is very much yes. We are on
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: the verge of entering a territory that our founding fathers
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: would be rolling over in their grave if they witnessed.
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: I said this earlier today when someone asked me about
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: this absurd ruling against Donald Trump for three hundred and
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: fifty four million dollars in fines from a radical activist
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: judge that was waiving at the TV cameras from day one.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: He was wanting to be famous, and it was very
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: clear that he was going to find Donald Trump guilty.
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: This judge, Arthur Ingron or whatever the hell his name is,
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: might as well get on a plane, go to Russia
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: and become a judge there, because he's a judge that
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: already knows what he's going to do before he's ever
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: heard the case. This is what they do in communists
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: and socialist nations. But what this judge has done finding
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: Trump three hundred and fifty four million dollars is more
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: than the GDP of some small countries.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: Around the world.
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: Not only that, it has also barred him from running
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: businesses in New York for three years, it also weaponized
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: our justicism to go after the children of Donald J.
• 1:39
  Speaker 2: Trump.
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: And what you need to understand about this judge is
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: this judge is proud of himself. Judge Arthur finding the
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: former president and the Trump organization on Friday in the
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: civil fraud case for more than three hundred and fifty million,
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: barring him from serving as even an officer or a
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: director of any New York corporation for three years is
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: in essence of essentence to the business of Donald Trump
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: in his life's work in New York. I want to
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: remind you that the New York Attorney General, Miss James,
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: sought to essentially bankrupt Trump by calling for the three
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: hundred and seventy million dollars fine in a lifetime from
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: the real estate industry in New York State, saying you
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: can't do anything in the real estate industry. Lemire also
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: remind you that James claim that Trump committed financial fraud.
• 2:29
  Speaker 2: Here's the problem. No one was defrauded.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: No one lost money, and no one actually sued Donald J.
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: Trump.
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: The banks even came in that loaned him the money
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: and said they were not defrauded and defended the deals
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: that they did with Trump, saying they were paid back
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: in full. Now you think about this, and again, this
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: Sky might as well be a judge in communists China.
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: He might as well be a judge in Russia or
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: in Cuba, where you go go in and attack and
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: lock up your political enemies, and you destroy their lives
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: and their families' lives, and you take everything from them
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: until they bow down to you. That is what this
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: judge was wanting to do, and that is what the
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: Attorney General James sought to do.
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: And ran on.
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: James ran the New York Attorney General ran on, saying
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: I am going to go after Donald Trump.
• 3:24
  Speaker 2: Vote for me.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: I will find a crime and I will convict him
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: of a crime if you vote for me. And that's
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: exactly what the Democratic Socialists, Communist Marxist Party has now done.
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: Now what does this mean moving forward? Donald Trump plans
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: to appeal the ruling. This is a case that should
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: have never been brought, and it's a case where no
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: one is entitled to damages. No one is entitled to damages.
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: So the question is who gets the three hundred and
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: fifty sixty seventy million dollars because there were no victims
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: from Donald Trump or his businesses. Constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: called the ruling extreme and abusive. The judgment, by the way,
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: is the second this year in which Trump was found
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: guilty and required to pay millions of dollars. Remember Egen
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: Carroll her defamation case against him. The judge ordered Trump
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: to pay eighty three point three million dollars. It was
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: an absurd case, a case where there was no crime committed,
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: but then they said Donald Trump slandered the woman that
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: accused him of rape that she then said never happened.
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: And then what happened, she sued for defamation. Found an
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: activist judge and a judge that said, not only are
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: we going to find you guilty of defamation against a
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: woman that longfully accused you of a crime that never happened,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: but we're going to bankrupt you and you have to
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: pay her eighty three point three million. NBC News reported
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: specifics of that case, saying, quote James contended the defendant
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: use the inflated financial statements to obtain bank loans and
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: insurance policies at rates he otherwise wouldn't have been entitled
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: and reaped hundreds of millions of dollars in ill gotten gains.
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: Among the examples cited as fraud by the Attorney General's
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: Office during the trial was Trump valuing his home in
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: Trump Tower, New York City at three times its actual
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: size and value, as well as including a brand value
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: to increase the valuation of his golf courses on the
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: financial statements which explicitly said brand values were not included.
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Another example pointed to by the Attorney General clearly got
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: under his skin. This is how the unbiased NBC News
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: was reporting this case. Hey dispute over the value of Marlago,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: his social club and residence in Florida. Trump's financial statements
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: between twenty eleven and twenty twenty one valued mar Lago
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: at between four hundred and twenty six million to six
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: hundred and twelve million, while the Palm Beach County Accessor
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: appraise the properties market value to be between eighteen and
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: twenty seven million during the same time frame. There isn't
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: an investor in America today that wouldn't buy mar Lago
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: for eighteen to twenty seven million dollars. And if you've
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: ever been to Marlago, you know that it is not
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: worth eighteen to twenty seven million dollars. You know it's
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Everyone knows that it
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: is not hard to figure out that it's worth more
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: than eighteen to twenty seven million dollars. But what did
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: this judge say? This judge also said, I'm not done there.
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: I'm finding Trump's adult sons, Don Junior and Eric Lible
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: for a host of civil fraud counts in New York, including,
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: he says, issuing false financial statements, falsifying.
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: Business records, and conspiracy.
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: He ordered each of them to pay four million for
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: their personal for their personal profits from the quote unquote
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: fraud where no one was defrauded. In addition, the judge
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: find former Trump Organization chief financial officer Alan Weisenberg another
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: million dollars.
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: Why did this happen?
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: Because you had activist das and activist judges that said,
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: we can do whatever we want and we're going to
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: ruin Donald Trump. Not a single person testify that they
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: were harmed by Trump. That they that they felt like
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: they were lied to by Trump, that they lost money
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: because of the deals with Trump. There were no victims here.
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: There was no one that lost money. There was nobody
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: that wasn't paid back. All of this was trumped up
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: by activists who went after their political enemies. This is
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: no different than Vladimir Putin killing another one of his
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: political enemies yesterday. This is exactly what we're now doing
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: in this country. We're going after and allowing our judges
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: and activist das to go after Donald Trump or other
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: people they hate in politics now, and they're able to
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: do it if they're in a liberal place of business.
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: This is disgusting on a level that this country has
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: never seen before.
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: And if they can do it to him, they will
• 8:43
  Speaker 2: do it to you. Now, let's just pause.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: Real quick on what's happening in New York and go
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: back to the other headline that's being covered up because
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: of this headline in New York, And that's what's happening
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: in Georgia with the Rico charges against Donald Trump and
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: other conservatives. Right as I mentioned a second ago, they'll
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: do it to Donald Trump, they'll do it to you. Well,
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: you've got well over a dozen other Conservatives that were
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: charged with crimes in Georgia by another activist, da Fanny Willis.
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: Now we found out a hell of a lot more
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: about the corruption around Fanny Willis and how she is
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: probably going to be kicked off of this case because
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: of her corruption. I want you to hear my conversation
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: about what has happened in Georgia with Senator Ted Cruz.
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: We talked about this on our podcast as I host
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: with him, Verdict with Ted Cruz, and I want you
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: to hear his take on exactly what's going down in Georgia.
• 9:42
  Speaker 3: Well, as we know, there are four pending prosecutions against
• 9:45
  Speaker 3: Donald Trump, and the effort of the Democrats to try
• 9:48
  Speaker 3: to destroy Donald Trump and in particular to try to
• 9:51
  Speaker 3: prevent the voters from being able to vote for him
• 9:53
  Speaker 3: and elect him, is massive. One of the most problematic cases.
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: All of them are messed up. You look at the
• 10:00
  Speaker 3: Georgia case. The Georgia case is an absolute disaster. And
• 10:03
  Speaker 3: I will tell you, if you are a wild eyed
• 10:06
  Speaker 3: left wing partisan that wants to see Donald Trump prosecuted,
• 10:10
  Speaker 3: this week was a very, very bad week for you.
• 10:14
  Speaker 3: Because Fanny Willis, the Fulton County DA testified and it
• 10:19
  Speaker 3: turns out the lead prosecutor that she hired was a man.
• 10:24
  Speaker 3: She was sleeping with a man, She was having an
• 10:26
  Speaker 3: affair with a man, She was paying hundreds of thousands
• 10:31
  Speaker 3: of dollars a taxpayer money, including tens of thousands of
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: dollars in cash under the table, and she lied to
• 10:39
  Speaker 3: the court about it. I mean, it is as bad
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: a train wreck as you've ever seen. And by the way,
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: if you don't believe me, listen to what MSNBC had
• 10:48
  Speaker 3: to say about this week.
• 10:50
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 10:51
  Speaker 5: Don't let the legal liest fool you. This is epic,
• 10:54
  Speaker 5: This is monumental. If things are going in the direction
• 10:56
  Speaker 5: we think Fannie Willis lied to the court, it's a
• 11:00
  Speaker 5: game over for her. She will be disqualified. If they
• 11:04
  Speaker 5: had a relationship prior to when they represent it to
• 11:08
  Speaker 5: the court. It's a huge deal. I can overstate it.
• 11:11
  Speaker 2: I can overstate it lying to the court.
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: Center can you explain how big of a deal that is,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: especially if you're the DA, and on top of that,
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: you've hired the special prosecutor who you're funneling taxpayer dollars too,
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: that you're in a relationship with. This is corruption at
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: like Biden crime family level.
• 11:29
  Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a massive problem. She was caught with her
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: hand in the cookie jar, and it undermines the entire prosecution.
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: It makes clear that this was a partisan hit job
• 11:42
  Speaker 3: from day one. But here listen to her testimony at
• 11:46
  Speaker 3: the trial.
• 11:46
  Speaker 4: It's interesting that we'll hear about this money. Mister Wade
• 11:50
  Speaker 4: is used to women that, as he told me one time,
• 11:54
  Speaker 4: the only thing a woman can do for him is
• 11:55
  Speaker 4: make him a sandwich. We would have brutal arguments about
• 12:00
  Speaker 4: the fact that I am your equal. I don't need
• 12:02
  Speaker 4: anything from a man. A man is not a plan.
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: A man is a companion, and so there was tension
• 12:09
  Speaker 4: always in our relationship, which is why I would give
• 12:12
  Speaker 4: him his money back. I don't need anybody to put
• 12:16
  Speaker 4: my bills. The only man who's ever put my bills
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: completely is my daddy.
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: I mean, Sarah, that's a new excuse I've never heard
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: for funneling money to your boyfriend lover's sash special prosecutor.
• 12:28
  Speaker 3: That's impressive, No, it really is. And understand this is bizarre.
• 12:34
  Speaker 3: District attorneys do not pay prosecutors and lawyers that they
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: have hired on the taxpayer dime. In stacks of cash.
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: That's what drug dealers do. And listen to the rest
• 12:47
  Speaker 3: of our testimony. Listen to this much.
• 12:49
  Speaker 4: Less cash that time, probably four or five hundred dollars.
• 12:52
  Speaker 4: And then I paid for a bunch of stuff. I
• 12:55
  Speaker 4: think we did two different wine truth that you do,
• 13:01
  Speaker 4: which are pretty expensive. I think I bought him he
• 13:04
  Speaker 4: likes wine. I don't really like wine, to be honest
• 13:06
  Speaker 4: with you, I like Gray Goose. I bought him a
• 13:10
  Speaker 4: bottle of wine while we were there. And the sippings
• 13:12
  Speaker 4: that you do. I can't remember how like four or
• 13:14
  Speaker 4: five different places you go. I remember we went to
• 13:20
  Speaker 4: to this place that they do pairings. That was the
• 13:23
  Speaker 4: most expensive thing that I think that we did while
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: we were there. So they would pair uh, they would
• 13:29
  Speaker 4: pair uh champagne chocolate and champagne, chocolate and caviar. It
• 13:36
  Speaker 4: was a three and it was like three different things. Sweden, Russia,
• 13:39
  Speaker 4: someplace else. I'll make that up, but that that was
• 13:42
  Speaker 4: the most expensive thing we did that trip, and I
• 13:44
  Speaker 4: paid for I paid for that. Do you pay cash
• 13:47
  Speaker 4: for us doing that? Yeah? I think.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: But by the way, Sentator, at least we now have
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: some real Russian collusions. She likes herself, some vodka from
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: from from from Russia.
• 13:58
  Speaker 5: Right.
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: She likes a Goose, champagne, chocolate and caviar and look
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: to pay cash. I mean, to be honest, Ben, when
• 14:09
  Speaker 3: is the last time you paid cash in anything more
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: than a McDonald's.
• 14:13
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I haven't seen cash like this.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: And we're talking from what they were saying at trial today,
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: not speculation.
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: This is tens of thousands of dollars in cash.
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: This is not small amounts. And to be honest, this
• 14:26
  Speaker 3: is you reference the Biden crime family. This is reminiscent
• 14:30
  Speaker 3: of when you make massive payments to multiple bank accounts.
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: You're doing it to hide what is happening. Nobody pays
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: thousands and thousands of dollars in cash unless you want
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: people not to know. And I got to say, listen
• 14:44
  Speaker 3: to her boyfriend's testimony because if anything, is even more shocking.
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: And this, by the way, her boyfriend that we're talking
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: about here, this is the special prosecutor.
• 14:55
  Speaker 3: If she hired with sax Paramney.
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: That is billed one hundreds and hundreds of thousands.
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: Of dollars to go after Donald Trump.
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: You got down Trump up to a million, they think,
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: and this is what he was asked about these credit
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: card statements and who paid for what?
• 15:13
  Speaker 6: Okay, and let's just talk about that travel.
• 15:16
  Speaker 7: Okay.
• 15:17
  Speaker 6: The first trip is Belize in March twenty twenty three.
• 15:21
  Speaker 6: Is that a trip that you took with miss Willis?
• 15:25
  Speaker 7: Are you asking did.
• 15:27
  Speaker 6: You take a trip with miss Willis in twenty twenty
• 15:29
  Speaker 6: three to the Belize?
• 15:30
  Speaker 7: I did?
• 15:31
  Speaker 6: Did you take a trip to California with Miss Willis
• 15:33
  Speaker 6: in twenty twenty three?
• 15:34
  Speaker 7: I did?
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: Did you.
• 15:37
  Speaker 6: Pay for those trips on that credit card?
• 15:41
  Speaker 7: I used a credit card to book to travel?
• 15:44
  Speaker 4: But understand she paid your back cash.
• 15:47
  Speaker 7: Well, let me say this. Let's take the Belize trip
• 15:51
  Speaker 7: for example. So you started there. That was a birthday
• 15:55
  Speaker 7: gift to me. So I paid nothing for that trip zero.
• 16:00
  Speaker 6: Okay. So the charges that are on your card she
• 16:04
  Speaker 6: gave you cash for she did. Okay, So all of
• 16:07
  Speaker 6: the charges.
• 16:09
  Speaker 7: The witness I finish chance on the question, oh did
• 16:11
  Speaker 7: your mom I did? Okay. I wanted to get into
• 16:16
  Speaker 7: the charges on the car because so traveling with her
• 16:23
  Speaker 7: is a is a task. You can probably imagine the
• 16:28
  Speaker 7: attention that that happens. So for safety reasons, she would
• 16:36
  Speaker 7: limit her transactions. I mean imagine trying to walk through
• 16:45
  Speaker 7: an airport or sit at the restaurant or do anything.
• 16:48
  Speaker 7: So there was no there's no attempt to conceal is
• 16:54
  Speaker 7: a credit card. Everything is here, so and that's.
• 16:59
  Speaker 6: Not what I asked. What I asked was the charges
• 17:03
  Speaker 6: for believes in March twenty twenty three, on that credit card,
• 17:06
  Speaker 6: those are things you purchased to go with miss Waite,
• 17:08
  Speaker 6: with miss Willis.
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: To believe, those.
• 17:11
  Speaker 7: Are things that we booked with my card that she paid.
• 17:14
  Speaker 6: Yes, yes, so those show up on your credit card.
• 17:17
  Speaker 7: They do.
• 17:18
  Speaker 6: And you're saying that she paid you cash to reimburse
• 17:20
  Speaker 6: you for all of that she did, and she paid
• 17:25
  Speaker 6: you cash for both of your portions are just hers both?
• 17:30
  Speaker 7: Okay?
• 17:30
  Speaker 6: So that trip believes just believee she paid you for
• 17:33
  Speaker 6: everything on belief, the entire trip. So the food, tattoo parlor,
• 17:37
  Speaker 6: all that stuff she paid for.
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: I'm good. I sorry anything the question.
• 17:45
  Speaker 7: There was no there was no tattoo parlor.
• 17:47
  Speaker 6: In believe the charges. There's a there's a tattoo parlor
• 17:50
  Speaker 6: on the charges. I'm not getting into what it was for.
• 17:53
  Speaker 6: I'm just asking if everything that's on that card related
• 17:55
  Speaker 6: to belize she paid you back for she paid for.
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: Yes, okay.
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: By the way, Senator, just the conversation general is hysterical,
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: but also the fact that they're both saying the same thing.
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: There is no pay per trayal I got paid back
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: in cash for every everything, every everything in cash. They're
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: in a single receipt. There's nothing here. And by the way,
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: one of those trips was my birthday, so she paid
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: for everything.
• 18:22
  Speaker 3: Look, neither you nor I or Spring Chickens. You're forty
• 18:26
  Speaker 3: plus years old. I'm fifty plus years old. Have you
• 18:30
  Speaker 3: ever taken a trip where you like, reimburse someone tens
• 18:35
  Speaker 3: of thousands of dollars in cash? I mean, just imagine
• 18:38
  Speaker 3: what kind of look like. This is not normal behavior.
• 18:41
  Speaker 3: This is the behavior of people who are concealing transactions
• 18:46
  Speaker 3: they don't want to have to happen. And by the way,
• 18:48
  Speaker 3: it's pretty nice that he charges everything to his credit card,
• 18:54
  Speaker 3: including the tattoo parlor. But he denies, but apparently it's
• 18:58
  Speaker 3: on his credit card. So I don't know if they
• 18:59
  Speaker 3: both got tattooed on their rear ends. We hate Donald Trump.
• 19:02
  Speaker 3: I don't know what they got tattooed.
• 19:06
  Speaker 2: We hate maggot, right.
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: But even the like little charges he's like, no, no, no,
• 19:12
  Speaker 3: I didn't pay a penny, understand.
• 19:14
  Speaker 2: Yeah, by the way, he's like, he's bragging.
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: Basically, he's like, damn straight, every penny she paid for.
• 19:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah, and pay me back in cash on all of it,
• 19:25
  Speaker 2: all of it.
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: It's incredible to the seriousness of this for a moment,
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: because that is just hysterical what we played for you.
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: But how big of a victory is this? Number one
• 19:35
  Speaker 2: for Donald Trump?
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: And if she has taken off the case, which means
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: he would be taking off the case, what does that
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: do moving forward for this case when it deals with
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump and they're going after again rico charges which
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: are serious against him.
• 19:47
  Speaker 2: That's how they put all this together.
• 19:49
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Look, it's not clear, but the prosecution is in shambles.
• 19:54
  Speaker 3: The prosecutor is at this point revealed to have liked
• 20:01
  Speaker 3: lied to the court, to be corrupt, to be funneling money,
• 20:04
  Speaker 3: to be paying taxpayer money to her lover and profiting
• 20:08
  Speaker 3: off that money. It ain't good at all, and that
• 20:12
  Speaker 3: means the case is Look as the MSNBC analyst said,
• 20:17
  Speaker 3: it's game over.
• 20:18
  Speaker 2: Look.
• 20:18
  Speaker 3: Could they try to revive it with some other prosecutor. Sure,
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: But this was always I think a rabid partisan Democrat
• 20:28
  Speaker 3: who hated Donald Trump, who wanted to make a name
• 20:30
  Speaker 3: for herself. And I got to say, you know, listening
• 20:33
  Speaker 3: to the story of his saying it's hard to travel
• 20:36
  Speaker 3: with her, I don't know. I'm kind of skeptical that
• 20:38
  Speaker 3: walking through an airport anyone has any idea who Fanny
• 20:41
  Speaker 3: Willis is. But if that's his theories like we had
• 20:46
  Speaker 3: to hide it because everyone knows who she is, Listen,
• 20:49
  Speaker 3: I think that was the objective of bringing this case,
• 20:51
  Speaker 3: and maybe it worked. I don't know.
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I definitely did.
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: And by the way, if you think that this means
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: that this is the you know, a want and done
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: and Donald Trump's going to get to move back to
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: the campaign, You're wrong. Donald Trump's New York custo money case,
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: this is that criminal case there will start March to
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: twenty fifth. It's the first of his criminal trials. And
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: final question on this center. Is this the reason why
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: Democrats basically went around the country and started throwing jello
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: at a wall and seeing if they get any of
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: it to stick. And they're doing all of these cases
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: so that if this one falls, hey, we start another
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: one March the twenty fifth and if that one falls,
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: we'll start another one in May or June.
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: Look, yes and no, I don't think this is a
• 21:33
  Speaker 3: grand conspiracy. I don't think there's one grand puba in
• 21:36
  Speaker 3: a smoke filled room saying you bring this case, you
• 21:39
  Speaker 3: bring this case, you bring this case. And part of
• 21:41
  Speaker 3: the reason is if you were trying to do a
• 21:44
  Speaker 3: grand conspiracy, no one would pick Fanny Willis to be
• 21:47
  Speaker 3: part of it, Like this prosecutor is a mess, and
• 21:52
  Speaker 3: so I think it is.
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: Instead, is it political opportunists that are just saying I
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: got to make a name for myself and I.
• 22:00
  Speaker 3: There's a concept in antitrust law called conscious parallelism, which
• 22:05
  Speaker 3: is it's a bunch of rabid partisan Democrats, all of
• 22:09
  Speaker 3: whom hate Donald Trump, and they're all racing to I'm
• 22:12
  Speaker 3: gonna get him. No, I'm gonna get him. No, I'm
• 22:14
  Speaker 3: gonna get him. So whether it is Fanny Willis, whether
• 22:17
  Speaker 3: it is Alvin Bragg, whether it's Jack Smith, whether it's
• 22:19
  Speaker 3: Letitia James, They're all like, I'm an ambitious Democrat and
• 22:24
  Speaker 3: I hate the person that I think is the devil,
• 22:27
  Speaker 3: So let's go abuse the justice system to go after him.
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: I want to move to another really important, big story,
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: and this is one that has not been reported on
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: by the media at all, and it deals with a
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: Hamas command tunnel under the United Nations Gaza headquarters. It
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: seems unbelievable, but it also backs up with reality of
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: what we saw in Gaza with the Associated Press and
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: Reuters and others who had their offices in the same
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: offices where Hamas had apparently intel centers and command centers.
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: And now we find out that Hamas had a command
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: tunnel under a un guys A headquarters. How did the
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: United Nations not know about this, Senator.
• 23:16
  Speaker 3: Well, listen. The organization is something that's called UNRA, and
• 23:21
  Speaker 3: an UNRA stands for the United Nations Relief and Works
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: Agency and it is a part of the United Nations
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: that is focused on giving aid to the Palestinians. And
• 23:35
  Speaker 3: major stories have broken. UNRA has always had massive corruption,
• 23:40
  Speaker 3: massive aid to Hamas, and so last month the news
• 23:46
  Speaker 3: broke that a dozen staff of UNRA, a dozen people
• 23:50
  Speaker 3: working for the un took part in the October seventh
• 23:56
  Speaker 3: massacre by Hamas. They were actively terrorists engaging in the
• 24:01
  Speaker 3: October seventh attack which killed over twelve hundred people and
• 24:05
  Speaker 3: took over two hundred and fifty hostages. Now, pause and
• 24:09
  Speaker 3: think about it. The United Nations is employing and paying terrorists.
• 24:15
  Speaker 3: But then the news broke just a few days ago
• 24:17
  Speaker 3: that not only was the un employing terrorists, but beneath
• 24:23
  Speaker 3: the headquarters of UNRA was a subterranean data center. It
• 24:30
  Speaker 3: had an electrical room, it had industrial battery power banks,
• 24:36
  Speaker 3: and it had living quarters for hamas terrorists who were
• 24:40
  Speaker 3: operating the computer servers. And it was built directly under
• 24:44
  Speaker 3: the location of the headquarters of UNRA. Now, that could
• 24:49
  Speaker 3: not have happened by accident, and it totally reveals UNRA
• 24:54
  Speaker 3: as a facilitating entity for terrorists.
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: So all the money here.
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: If andra's getting funds from the United Nations, and we're
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: the biggest donor to the United Nations, we're giving money
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: and it's being funneled to those that are helping carry
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: out terrorist attacks as well as protecting terrasts and the
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: planning and the rockets that are being shot into Israel
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: for years now while they've been in the same building.
• 25:26
  Speaker 3: Now, that's exactly right. As The Times of Israel reported,
• 25:30
  Speaker 3: unro's Gaza headquarters is located in Gaza City's upscale Remal neighborhood,
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: an area that the Israeli the IDF had previously operated
• 25:42
  Speaker 3: in and dismantled the local Hamas battalion and withdrawn its
• 25:46
  Speaker 3: troops from And here's a quote from Colonel Benny Aharon
• 25:53
  Speaker 3: from the IDF, who says, quote, the IDF was here previously.
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: The first time was to destroy the enemy. But when
• 26:00
  Speaker 3: we were here the last time, we collected a lot
• 26:02
  Speaker 3: of intelligence documents and findings, a lot of prisoners, and
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: thanks to this we reached here. Now we carried out
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: a targeted operation to take this capability away. We had
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: a basis of information, but not enough to be able
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: to dig down twenty meters to find it twenty meters
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: about sixty feet. We needed a bit more. There's information
• 26:27
  Speaker 3: we get from prisoners, we capture from computers, we find
• 26:31
  Speaker 3: from documents, maps, and they went down and discovered this
• 26:39
  Speaker 3: terror tunnel. Hazan, who is tasked with coordinating the brigade's
• 26:44
  Speaker 3: underground operation, said the main entrance to the tunnel was
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: located under an unrushed school in the area. Wo and
• 26:54
  Speaker 3: this look the UN you want to talk about number one.
• 26:58
  Speaker 3: The UN has always been just a pit of anti Semitism,
• 27:01
  Speaker 3: anti Israel hatred, but they have funneled billions of dollars
• 27:07
  Speaker 3: to UNRA, which in turn is supporting terrorists and supporting
• 27:13
  Speaker 3: Hamas and employing people who participated in the October seventh
• 27:19
  Speaker 3: terror attack.
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: What will America's response be to this, as the Biden
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: administration said anything? And are there anyone in his administration
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: or the UN ambassador asking questions saying what the hell
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: is going on at the United Nations Relief and Work
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: Agency that's been knowingly, as you described it, providing support
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: to Hamas terrorists who committed these atrocies against over a
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: thousand Israelies and dozens of Americans as well, which I
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: think has been overlooked as well by this administration.
• 27:47
  Speaker 3: Yes, so sadly, the Biden administration from day one has
• 27:51
  Speaker 3: been funneling money into Gaza. Look early on in the
• 27:56
  Speaker 3: Biden administration, I led a group of seventeen senators saying,
• 27:59
  Speaker 3: do not get give money to Gaza because if you
• 28:02
  Speaker 3: give money to Gaza, that will flow directly to Hamas
• 28:05
  Speaker 3: and be used for terrorist activities. At the time I
• 28:09
  Speaker 3: sent that letter, there were one hundred and fifty House
• 28:11
  Speaker 3: Democrats who sent a letter to the administration saying please
• 28:16
  Speaker 3: do give money to Gaza even though it will likely
• 28:20
  Speaker 3: be used by Hamas for terrorism. We now know because
• 28:23
  Speaker 3: it's been publicly reported how the Biden administration resolved that issue.
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: The Biden administration concluded that it was quote highly likely
• 28:32
  Speaker 3: those are their terms, highly likely that money given to
• 28:36
  Speaker 3: Gaza would be used by Hamas for terrorism. Now ordinarily
• 28:41
  Speaker 3: been under US anti terrorism law. If it's highly likely
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: the money will be used for terrorism, you can't send
• 28:47
  Speaker 3: the money. That would be common sense. Well, what the
• 28:49
  Speaker 3: Biden administration did instead is they formally waived US anti
• 28:55
  Speaker 3: terrorism law because their political ideology, they so wanted to
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: send the money they didn't care if it would be
• 29:02
  Speaker 3: used by Hamas for terrorism. So, in a very real sense,
• 29:06
  Speaker 3: Joe Biden and the Democrats funded Hamas and the October
• 29:11
  Speaker 3: seventh terror attack.
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: Which goes back to the bigger question in the aid.
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: It looks like American aid. We say, hey, we're going
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: to send some to Israel, but we're also wanting to
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: send aid to Gaza. How do we not How do
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: we assure that that money's not going to go directly
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: in the hands of the terrorists.
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: We can't, and it is truly asinine. And in the
• 29:34
  Speaker 3: wake of this horrific terror attack, what did Joe Biden
• 29:37
  Speaker 3: the Democrats want to do. Let's send more money to Gaza.
• 29:39
  Speaker 3: Let's send more money to Gaza. And my view is
• 29:42
  Speaker 3: stop sending money to people who want to kill us.
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: If you cannot assure that the money doesn't go to
• 29:49
  Speaker 3: terrorists who want to murder Americans, don't send the money.
• 29:53
  Speaker 3: And by the way, this past week, I let a
• 29:56
  Speaker 3: group of senators urging the Justice Department to open but
• 30:00
  Speaker 3: a criminal investigation into a US based nonprofit that raises
• 30:05
  Speaker 3: money for UNRA. And it's a group called UNRA USA,
• 30:12
  Speaker 3: which is a nonprofit with the self described mission to
• 30:15
  Speaker 3: support the quote work of UNRA through fundraising, education, and
• 30:21
  Speaker 3: advocacy in the United States. And as I pointed out,
• 30:25
  Speaker 3: here's what I wrote in the letter with several other senators. Quote,
• 30:29
  Speaker 3: we write to call on you to open a criminal
• 30:30
  Speaker 3: investigation into UNRA USA, its principles, and its leadership for
• 30:35
  Speaker 3: knowingly providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations including hamas.
• 30:42
  Speaker 3: This support facilitated and continues to facilitate terrorism, including the
• 30:48
  Speaker 3: October seventh terrorist attack in which Palestinian terrorist killed or
• 30:53
  Speaker 3: kidnapped dozens of Americans and over one thy two hundred Israelis.
• 30:59
  Speaker 3: According to its twenty twenty one annual report, RA USA
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: dispersed nearly five million dollars in donations to ANRA that year,
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: making the organization ora's largest institutional donor.
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: Make sure you share a podcast please.
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: Everywhere you're on social media, write us a five star
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: review and I'll see you back here tomorrow morning