Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / CLINTON PART 6: Hillary in MAJOR TROUBLE as Washington Post removes large portions of two stories on Steele dossier!

Transcript

CLINTON PART 6: Hillary in MAJOR TROUBLE as Washington Post removes large portions of two stories on Steele dossier! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: Part six of our deep dive expose into the new
0:03
Speaker 1: indictments coming now from the Durham investigation and the media.
0:08
Speaker 1: The biggest newsday of the week on Sunday, they started
0:13
Speaker 1: to move into what we're referring to is damage control.
0:17
Speaker 1: Liberal media outlets have not been following what some in
0:22
Speaker 1: the media have decided to start doing, which is to
0:25
Speaker 1: delete bad information on the erroneous Still dossier. Even the
0:32
Speaker 1: Washington Post now quietly is now correcting their own reporting. Now,
0:38
Speaker 1: ABC News, CNN, and MSNBC are among news organizations that
0:44
Speaker 1: actually relied on the Washington Posts now corrected reporting. Yet
0:49
Speaker 1: they have not come out and corrected what they told
0:53
Speaker 1: the American people for virtually two years now. The Washington
0:57
Speaker 1: Post didn't do it like on a front page we
1:00
Speaker 1: were wrong or we must correct this. They just went
1:02
Speaker 1: back to the online stories, and in those online stories
1:06
Speaker 1: they decided to hit that pause button and delete some
1:11
Speaker 1: of the erroneous Still dossier reporting that they did. Now,
1:15
Speaker 1: the Washington Post was the lead on this. Don't forget that.
1:17
Speaker 1: Remember this is you know, this is Amazon Bezos. They
1:21
Speaker 1: own this thing, right, This is pure propaganda. And the
1:24
Speaker 1: liberal media outlets took the Washington Post reporting. Why why
1:30
Speaker 1: would they do it? Well, they're the Washington Post, the
1:32
Speaker 1: Washington Post, the same group of people that brought down
1:35
Speaker 1: the Knicks administration. They're the same ones that did the
1:37
Speaker 1: deep dive investigation into Watergate. They're the ones that are
1:40
Speaker 1: you know, the print of the Pentagon papers. They're the
1:44
Speaker 1: most trusted name in DC. So every other news organization
1:49
Speaker 1: relied on them. Put it on them. Oh well, the
1:52
Speaker 1: Washington Post reporting, So therefore we can do what we
1:54
Speaker 1: want to do now. This weekend, you also had something
2:00
Speaker 1: else that happened. Representive Adam Schiff went on TV to
2:03
Speaker 1: take a few slaps. Now I say a few slaps,
2:07
Speaker 1: because that's really all that it was. It was very
2:10
Speaker 1: clear that the Biden administration, now with their connections directly
2:14
Speaker 1: to steal dossier, needed a distraction and kind of need
2:18
Speaker 1: this thing to go away. And how do you get
2:19
Speaker 1: to go away? What you do is you say, well,
2:22
Speaker 1: all right, here's the deal. You need to go on TV,
2:27
Speaker 1: and we'll get you to go on TV. And then
2:29
Speaker 1: when you do go on TV, what we'll end up
2:32
Speaker 1: doing is we'll kind of tell everybody that, well, some
2:35
Speaker 1: of this was wrong, but you can just say, well,
2:37
Speaker 1: a lot of it was right, and then we get
2:39
Speaker 1: to check the box and the media that we covered
2:42
Speaker 1: the fact that this thing is completely totally full of crap.
2:45
Speaker 1: It's been totally discredited, and you can spend it how
2:49
Speaker 1: you want to, but we need you to come on
2:50
Speaker 1: TV because for two years, three years, four years, not
2:53
Speaker 1: only do we help you sell this thing, we were
2:55
Speaker 1: a part of the conspiracy to overthrow the will of
2:57
Speaker 1: the people. So this is what some referred to as
3:02
Speaker 1: a confrontation. Quote Meet the Press confronted Representive Adam Schiff
3:09
Speaker 1: on the fake steel Dolcier Democrat Representative Schiff and says
3:13
Speaker 1: he doesn't regret pushing it. Now, if this is confronting,
3:17
Speaker 1: then I'm sorry. But they haven't watched their own show
3:20
Speaker 1: when they're attacking people on the right. Go look at
3:24
Speaker 1: the venom that was being spewed at Trump for four
3:27
Speaker 1: years from Meet the Press and Chuck Todd over the
3:30
Speaker 1: fake reporting. Now, did he come on TV and say
3:32
Speaker 1: to the American people, we got it wrong. Did he
3:35
Speaker 1: come on there and say the American people, I'm sorry
3:38
Speaker 1: that we got this thing so wrong. Did he come
3:41
Speaker 1: on TV and say I apologize for misleading you, I
3:46
Speaker 1: apologize to former President Donald Trump for undermining and slandering
3:51
Speaker 1: his entire administration for the entire time that they were
3:55
Speaker 1: in office. Of course, not right. Why would you do that,
3:58
Speaker 1: because if you really are reaching tracting this, and you
4:00
Speaker 1: really aren't admitting that what you did was wrong, then
4:04
Speaker 1: you would have no problem saying it this way. You
4:07
Speaker 1: should start your show by saying, we like to say
4:10
Speaker 1: here at me NBC News and meet the press to
4:12
Speaker 1: form President Donald Trump. We are sorry. We got this
4:15
Speaker 1: story wrong. We relied on the Washington Post, throw them
4:18
Speaker 1: under the bus for this reporting, and we were wrong,
4:21
Speaker 1: and we were unfair to you the way that we
4:23
Speaker 1: dealt with things. We are sorry. You could do that,
4:26
Speaker 1: You could say that, and then you might have some credibility.
4:29
Speaker 1: But they're not. Instead, they act like they are the
4:33
Speaker 1: conveyors of truth and only truth, and so they're going
4:36
Speaker 1: to ask the tough question, right, They're going to ask
4:39
Speaker 1: the hard question and go, well, Adam Schiff, do you
4:43
Speaker 1: regret pushing something that was wrong? That's it, And then
4:47
Speaker 1: we get to close this book and move on. What
4:49
Speaker 1: ask you something about the steel dosier because it is
4:52
Speaker 1: been in the news for a lot of other reasons,
4:54
Speaker 1: including some questions about its validity. By the way, I
4:58
Speaker 1: love how he says that some questions about it validity.
5:00
Speaker 1: It's not some questions, folks. The fact is, and it's
5:04
Speaker 1: confirmed now. There is no validity to the Steel dossier.
5:09
Speaker 1: Don't say some questions about its validity. The only reason
5:14
Speaker 1: why it's in the news right now is because of
5:16
Speaker 1: the fact that there is no validity to the information.
5:21
Speaker 1: That's a fact, plain and simple. We wouldn't be talking
5:25
Speaker 1: about this right now if it wasn't for the German
5:27
Speaker 1: investigation and doubting the people that created the dossier for
5:30
Speaker 1: lying about what's in the dossier. Don't don't. Don't sit
5:33
Speaker 1: there and tell me and think I'm stupid enough to
5:35
Speaker 1: buy this crap checked out where you say, well, it's
5:37
Speaker 1: been the news this week for some questioning the validity. No,
5:41
Speaker 1: it's not even questioning. It's a fact. It's not true.
5:43
Speaker 1: The Steal dossier is not true. It's the Clinton dotsier.
5:46
Speaker 1: We need to stop calling it the steal dossier. We
5:48
Speaker 1: need to call it the Clinton Dotier. Ink some questions
5:51
Speaker 1: about its validity. I want to play some recent a
5:56
Speaker 1: sound that you had on the Steel dossia over the years.
5:59
Speaker 1: Take a listen. According to Christopher Steele, a British a
6:04
Speaker 1: former British intelligence officer who was reportedly held in high
6:08
Speaker 1: regard by US intelligence. When you look at just what
6:11
Speaker 1: has become public, some of the public information is very
6:15
Speaker 1: much in line with what is reported in that dossier.
6:17
Speaker 1: The most significant thing to me is that Christopher Steele
6:20
Speaker 1: may have found out even before our own intelligence agencies,
6:23
Speaker 1: that the Russians were in fact aiming to help Donald
6:26
Speaker 1: Trump in the election. As Chair of the House Intelligence Committee,
6:29
Speaker 1: do you regret giving some credibility to the Steele dossier?
6:32
Speaker 1: Before hold on, he just says, do you regret giving
6:35
Speaker 1: some credibility? You didn't give it some credit ability. You
6:39
Speaker 1: preached it like it was the gospel. You didn't There
6:43
Speaker 1: wasn't a moment where you said, look, we need to
6:45
Speaker 1: be careful here, we need to pause here, we need
6:47
Speaker 1: to take a moment here, we need to step back
6:49
Speaker 1: and look, there's certainly some concerning issues, but we also
6:52
Speaker 1: need to check the ability. That's what That's not what
6:54
Speaker 1: they did. That's not what the media did. By the way,
6:57
Speaker 1: none of them did this. They all went the completely
7:00
Speaker 1: opposite direction on this. Don't don't act like this was
7:07
Speaker 1: a you know, well, we played both sides of it.
7:10
Speaker 1: You didn't. You didn't play both sides of this at all.
7:14
Speaker 1: You were one hundred percent all in on it. You
7:17
Speaker 1: were one hundred percent moving forward with this. And to
7:20
Speaker 1: sit there and go, well, should you have paused a
7:22
Speaker 1: little bit? There was no pausing here, Give me a break.
7:28
Speaker 1: There was zero pause, folks, no pause at all. Don't
7:32
Speaker 1: tell me there was a pause when there wasn't a pause.
7:36
Speaker 1: You guys ran with it, and you wanted to run
7:38
Speaker 1: with it because you wanted to destroy people's lives, and
7:42
Speaker 1: that's why you did it. You did it to destroy
7:45
Speaker 1: and to put people in jail. You did it to
7:49
Speaker 1: overthrow the will of the people and this idea that
7:52
Speaker 1: you know. Now I'm gonna ask Chuck Todd, I'm gonna
7:55
Speaker 1: come out of this. You know you're comments. I'm gonna
7:57
Speaker 1: ask you this question. Do you regret it a little bit?
7:59
Speaker 1: Give me a break. As chair of the House Intelligence Committee,
8:02
Speaker 1: do you regret giving some credibility to the steal dosia
8:06
Speaker 1: before anybody had been able to verify anything in that
8:11
Speaker 1: A lot of those clips were done before there was
8:13
Speaker 1: any good verification. Look, there's some news organizations that made
8:16
Speaker 1: the mistake of publishing this docier without verifying it. That's
8:19
Speaker 1: a separate conversation with those I love this well, there's
8:21
Speaker 1: some media organizations. Let's go with all of them, yours included.
8:26
Speaker 1: By the way, NBC News put the dossier out there,
8:30
Speaker 1: you're on NBC News right now. You guys ran with
8:33
Speaker 1: the story, and you ran with it for four years
8:35
Speaker 1: and use it to impeach the president, to undermine the president.
8:37
Speaker 1: Now you're trying to separate yourself from it, acting like
8:39
Speaker 1: you weren't a part of the mob that was trying
8:43
Speaker 1: to take down Donald Trump, that you weren't a part
8:45
Speaker 1: of the conspiracy to overthrow the will of the American
8:47
Speaker 1: people and who they voted for. NBC News was in
8:50
Speaker 1: on it now, and they're trying to act like they weren't. Listen, Listen,
8:54
Speaker 1: listen to the way Chuck Todd says this again, patients
8:56
Speaker 1: that made the mistake of publishing this docier without verifying it.
9:00
Speaker 1: That's a separate conversation with those news organizations. By the way,
9:03
Speaker 1: NBC News, you really want to act like you were different.
9:07
Speaker 1: Do we need to go back and look at the propaganda.
9:09
Speaker 1: Look at the number of appearances that you had from
9:14
Speaker 1: people that were on your air saying that Donald Trump
9:17
Speaker 1: colluded with the Russians, The number of guests that you
9:19
Speaker 1: allowed to come on the air and to sell this
9:22
Speaker 1: crap and act like this was totally factual when it
9:25
Speaker 1: clearly wasn't. None of this was factual, and everybody knew,
9:31
Speaker 1: including you, that was based on crap. And you did
9:34
Speaker 1: it anyway. You did it anyway, and the reason why
9:41
Speaker 1: is because you were part of the conspiracy to take
9:44
Speaker 1: down Donald Trump. That's what you did. Now listen to
9:48
Speaker 1: the response quickly of Adam Schiff, But you helped give
9:53
Speaker 1: it credibility. Do you regret it? I don't regret saying
9:58
Speaker 1: that we should investigate claims of someone who frankly was
10:01
Speaker 1: a well respected British intelligence officer, and we couldn't have known,
10:05
Speaker 1: of course, years ago, that we would learn years later
10:08
Speaker 1: that someone who was a primary source lied to him.
10:11
Speaker 1: But what I love it there, Well, I don't regret it.
10:14
Speaker 1: You undermind the president I tates America. You try to
10:16
Speaker 1: overthrow In many ways you did. You were successful. You
10:18
Speaker 1: undermined the point where he didn't get reelected. You damage
10:22
Speaker 1: his presidency to the point where the country was trade
10:24
Speaker 1: up divided on this, and you guys kept saying he's
10:27
Speaker 1: a Russian, he worked with the Russians, he colluded with
10:30
Speaker 1: the Russians. The last election wasn't fair. You guys did it,
10:33
Speaker 1: and so did NBC News. And for NBC News to
10:35
Speaker 1: do this interview and act like they weren't a part
10:36
Speaker 1: of it, give me a break. Liberal media outlets, like
10:42
Speaker 1: I said, if not followed the lead of the Washington Posts,
10:46
Speaker 1: they were forced to correct their erroneous steal dossier reporting claims.
10:51
Speaker 1: They just did you know, little hey updates on their
10:54
Speaker 1: major stories they had on their website, and the Washington
10:57
Speaker 1: Post not only corrected, but also removed large chunks of
11:03
Speaker 1: its own reporting on the anti Trump Clinton doc. Let's
11:08
Speaker 1: just start calling it that Friday the middle of the night,
11:11
Speaker 1: admitting quote it could no longer stand by the accuracy
11:14
Speaker 1: of those elements. Their words, not mine. ABC News hadn't
11:18
Speaker 1: changed their reporting, MSNBC hasn't changed it. M our CNN
11:22
Speaker 1: hasn't followed the Post lead on their erroneous reporting. It
11:27
Speaker 1: still remains uncorrected. The mainstream media was always united in
11:34
Speaker 1: their unverified reporting for one reason. They were in on
11:40
Speaker 1: the conspiracy to overthrow the will of the people and
11:45
Speaker 1: declare that former President Donald Trump was somehow compromised by
11:47
Speaker 1: the Russians, when reality it was Hillary Clinton her campaign
11:50
Speaker 1: in the DNC. Here's how Fox had it this weekend
11:56
Speaker 1: when they broke the story that the Washington Post was
11:59
Speaker 1: pulling their stories on the Steel Dossier. A major walk
12:05
Speaker 1: back from the Washington Post a paper correcting and retracting
12:09
Speaker 1: large portions of two articles based on the now discredited
12:13
Speaker 1: Steel Dossier. A Post media reporter explaining that the piece
12:16
Speaker 1: quote identified a Belarussian American businessman as the key source
12:21
Speaker 1: of the Steel Dossier, a collection of largely unverified reports
12:25
Speaker 1: that claimed the Russian government had compromising information about then
12:28
Speaker 1: candidate Donald Trump. Executive editor Sally Buzzby said the Post
12:32
Speaker 1: could no longer stand by the accuracy of those elements
12:35
Speaker 1: of the story. Here now to react. Fox News contributor
12:39
Speaker 1: Joe Concha, Joe, good morning to you. You know, I
12:41
Speaker 1: described it there as a major correction, But what shocking
12:45
Speaker 1: to me is this entire story, Joe, has completely fallen
12:49
Speaker 1: apart as we all knew that it would. It was
12:52
Speaker 1: largely built upon a falsehood on lies. And I think
12:56
Speaker 1: it's been relative silence from the mainstream media about this revelation.
13:01
Speaker 1: I'm amazed will that they even counted on the dossier
13:04
Speaker 1: in the first place. Right. I'm old enough to remember
13:06
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, this was pitched around to every major
13:09
Speaker 1: news organization, whether it be Fox News, whether it be
13:11
Speaker 1: The Hill, whether it be political. I could go down
13:13
Speaker 1: the list, and almost nobody touched it. Almost no one
13:15
Speaker 1: except for BuzzFeed and c the NN that got it
13:17
Speaker 1: out into public domain and off it went. But but
13:20
Speaker 1: the removal of the parts of the Steel reporting from
13:23
Speaker 1: this initial report, it's a start, but almost no one's
13:26
Speaker 1: going to see that. We know that, right, and the
13:27
Speaker 1: damage has already done. To your point, if the Washington
13:30
Speaker 1: Post New York Times were truly serious about getting it right,
13:32
Speaker 1: the pulsers they won would be returned. And you remember
13:35
Speaker 1: Dan Rathergate Rights two thousand and four, rather than producer
13:37
Speaker 1: Mary mats And put on a false report on sixty
13:39
Speaker 1: minutes about George W. Bush's National Guard Service just days
13:42
Speaker 1: before a tight election, And after that story was decided
13:45
Speaker 1: to be a crop, it was decidedly proven to be
13:47
Speaker 1: a croc. CBS conducts a thorough investigation, and rather's fired
13:51
Speaker 1: along with his producer and mats. No such investigation here
13:54
Speaker 1: will is going to be conducted by any news organizations
13:57
Speaker 1: here because there are no real standards anymore, no accountability.
14:00
Speaker 1: And again, the damage was done. Means to an end
14:02
Speaker 1: three years of a presidency consumed by this tall tale
14:05
Speaker 1: conjured up by the Clinton administration. In fact, you know, well,
14:08
Speaker 1: the liars get rewarded, right. Rachel Maddow MSNBC the biggest
14:12
Speaker 1: narrative in terms of the megaphone of this narrative, and
14:15
Speaker 1: we hear now there's a bidding war for her where
14:17
Speaker 1: CNN is considering hiring her away with a substantial raise
14:20
Speaker 1: that didn't go through, but now she's even more attractive
14:24
Speaker 1: to certain news organizations. Adam Schiff gets a multimillion dollar
14:27
Speaker 1: book deal and still hilariously claims that this collusion occurred
14:31
Speaker 1: in that book, and he will continue to be the
14:32
Speaker 1: Michael Abanatti on two thirds of cable news despite him
14:35
Speaker 1: being completely disproven, because that's just the way it works. Now.
14:39
Speaker 1: Such a good point, Joe. The damage is done. A
14:42
Speaker 1: presidential election was swung. Rachel Maddow showered between twenty and
14:46
Speaker 1: thirty million dollars awarded themselves Pulitzers based upon a complete
14:51
Speaker 1: fake story. Again, the media not correcting this. They can't
14:58
Speaker 1: correct it. They're terrified that if they correct it, what's
15:01
Speaker 1: going to happen If they correct this story, it is
15:05
Speaker 1: going to be so damning to their credibility that I
15:08
Speaker 1: think at this point they finally just decided, we'll just
15:11
Speaker 1: look the other way. What else can we do. We'll
15:16
Speaker 1: just act like it was true, and then we'll blame
15:19
Speaker 1: the Washington Post. That's how we'll pull this off. You know,
15:25
Speaker 1: you look at what the Wall Street Journal said this week,
15:28
Speaker 1: and it was a brilliant article that they put out
15:31
Speaker 1: saying that this Steel dossier should be called the Clinton dossier,
15:35
Speaker 1: not the Steel Dossier. You look at the Washington Post,
15:40
Speaker 1: the Hill now reporting this morning. Washington Post removes large
15:43
Speaker 1: portions of two stories and the Steel dossier quote. The
15:45
Speaker 1: Washington Post Post was forced on Friday to amend and
15:51
Speaker 1: eliminate major parts of two stories the newspaper did regarding
15:55
Speaker 1: the Steel Dossier and light of the recent indictment and
15:58
Speaker 1: new reporting. A story published in March twenty seventeen and
16:01
Speaker 1: one of February twenty nineteen, So think about the distance
16:04
Speaker 1: almost two years apart, that connected Source D in former
16:10
Speaker 1: British intelligence analyst Crystal Steals Dowsier to a Belarus American businessman,
16:17
Speaker 1: Sergey Milan, were corrected and had portions of the story removed.
16:22
Speaker 1: An editor's note appeared on each one, providing those of
16:25
Speaker 1: the articles had been amended. That's it, That's how they
16:28
Speaker 1: fixed this right. The March twenty seventeen article identified Milan
16:33
Speaker 1: is sourced and Source E is different in different areas
16:36
Speaker 1: of steal dossier, including identifying m as source D behind
16:40
Speaker 1: a claim that Russian intelligence learned that a hotel room
16:43
Speaker 1: in Moscow once was used by former President Obama and
16:46
Speaker 1: his wife was defiled by President Trump hire prostitutes. According
16:52
Speaker 1: to The Washington Post, the Downsier said that Source E
16:56
Speaker 1: also substantiate the claim. Those of the newspapers said that
16:59
Speaker 1: those allegations have not been proven true. You think. The
17:04
Speaker 1: Post also reported on a February twenty nineteen story which
17:08
Speaker 1: ran with a headline Belarus born businessman sought proximity to
17:11
Speaker 1: Trump's world in twenty sixteen, discussing the man's involvement in
17:15
Speaker 1: some business activities of the former president analysts. Du Chenko,
17:20
Speaker 1: who was indicted earlier this month, helped put together information
17:26
Speaker 1: for the Steele dossier, which should be called the Clinton
17:28
Speaker 1: dossier at this point. Dushenko's indictment alleges at the analysts
17:34
Speaker 1: might have received information regarding these delicious claims in the
17:37
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen story from an operative of the Democratic Party
17:42
Speaker 1: from Hillary Clinton and her campaign instead of Milan. According
17:46
Speaker 1: to the newspaper The Post that it also was The
17:51
Speaker 1: Post that it was also not clear if Milan was
17:55
Speaker 1: sourced d in the dossier, based upon her recent review
17:58
Speaker 1: an interview with one of the two sources cited in
18:01
Speaker 1: the March twenty seventeen article. So, in other words, the
18:05
Speaker 1: Washington Post can put this out there and run with
18:07
Speaker 1: it for years and years and years, and now they
18:10
Speaker 1: just get the point the being here at something else
18:11
Speaker 1: to say when we were lied to by multiple sources,
18:13
Speaker 1: not really our fault. So we're not gonna say we're
18:16
Speaker 1: sorry to Trump. We're not gonna apologize for misleading you
18:18
Speaker 1: the readers. We're gonna we're not gonna say that. We're
18:21
Speaker 1: just gonna say we got duped our bad. As a result,
18:24
Speaker 1: it created doubts amid the new reporting, The Post writes
18:29
Speaker 1: and indicated that after the indictment. Regarding the publication of
18:33
Speaker 1: the two stories, the executive editor, Sally Busby said, according
18:37
Speaker 1: to the newspaper, we needed to make the corrections. When
18:40
Speaker 1: asked for common as spokesperson for the Washington Post directed
18:44
Speaker 1: The Hill Newspaper to an editor's note that was put
18:47
Speaker 1: on the twenty seventeen story. This is what it read.
18:52
Speaker 1: The original version of this article, published on March twenty nine,
18:54
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen, said that Sergey Milan was a source are
19:00
Speaker 1: parts of a doosier of unverified allegations against Donald Trump.
19:06
Speaker 1: The account has been contradicted by allegations contained in a
19:10
Speaker 1: federal indictment filed in November twenty twenty one, and undermine
19:14
Speaker 1: by further reporting by The Washington Post. As a result,
19:18
Speaker 1: portions of the story and an accompanying video have been
19:21
Speaker 1: removed and the headline has been changed. The editor's note
19:25
Speaker 1: read the original account was based on two people who
19:28
Speaker 1: spoke on the condition of amenity to provide sense of information.
19:34
Speaker 1: One of those people now say the information the new
19:36
Speaker 1: information quote puts engraved doubt that Milan was a source
19:41
Speaker 1: for parts of the dossier. The other declined to comment.
19:44
Speaker 1: It continued, So the Washington Post doesn't have to be
19:47
Speaker 1: held accountable for this, because it's not our fault. Other
19:51
Speaker 1: people I do us. We just gave you the best information,
19:53
Speaker 1: stuck with it for four years, undermine the present, try
19:55
Speaker 1: to overthrow the world, the people, and now we'll correct you.
19:58
Speaker 1: We're not gonna say we're sorry. Okay, everybody calmed down.
20:02
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna say we're sorry. We're not gonna apologize
20:05
Speaker 1: at Trump. We're not gonna apologize our readers. We're not
20:08
Speaker 1: going to run a full retraction on page one. We're
20:10
Speaker 1: just gonna update the online story. In fact, if you
20:13
Speaker 1: buy the Washington Post, you wouldn't even know this happened
20:15
Speaker 1: if you get the real newspaper, because it's not in
20:17
Speaker 1: the real newspaper. Just so you know, this goes back
20:21
Speaker 1: to exactly why the Wall Street Journal has now come
20:25
Speaker 1: out and said the Steel dossier should not be called
20:27
Speaker 1: the steal dossier, should be called the Clinton dot Cia.
20:31
Speaker 1: Howard Kurtz on Fox put it this way brilliantly. The
20:37
Speaker 1: indictment of Igor Danchenko, the key source for the Tarners
20:40
Speaker 1: Steel dossier that was intertwined with the investigation of President
20:43
Speaker 1: Trump and Russia triggered this admission from The Washington Post,
20:48
Speaker 1: the paper set in today's lead story. The allegations cast
20:51
Speaker 1: new uncertainty on some past reporting on the dossier by
20:54
Speaker 1: news organizations, including The Washington Post. Yet, despite the enormous
20:59
Speaker 1: media tension to the Russia investigation, including the dossier, the NBC,
21:04
Speaker 1: ABC and CBS Evening newscast ignored the Danchenko indictment. Yesterday.
21:09
Speaker 1: Dan Chenko was charged with lying to the FBI about
21:12
Speaker 1: false information he fed to former British buy Christopher Steele,
21:16
Speaker 1: including unsubstantiated and selacious accusations against Trump. Dan Chenko allegedly
21:21
Speaker 1: fed some of his falsehoods to Charles Dolan, a former
21:24
Speaker 1: Clinton administration official. The FBI has said it launched the
21:28
Speaker 1: Russia probe before seeing the Steele dossier, but in a
21:31
Speaker 1: wire tap application for former Trump advisor Carter Page, the
21:35
Speaker 1: bureau used the dossier's claims. Fox News covered the story extensively.
21:40
Speaker 1: There were obvious red flags with the dossier from the
21:43
Speaker 1: very beginning. For one thing, Christopher Steele was working for
21:46
Speaker 1: an opposition research firm called Fusion GPS, which was funded
21:50
Speaker 1: by the Hillary Clinton campaign. CNN and MSNBC did not
21:54
Speaker 1: cover the story after five PM, except for Rachel Maddow,
21:57
Speaker 1: who had relentlessly trumpeted the investigation. This report comes in
22:02
Speaker 1: the midst of a concerted attack on Christopher Steele himself
22:06
Speaker 1: from Republicans in Congress, their alleging that he was basically
22:11
Speaker 1: peddling false information, and last night she slams Special Counsel
22:15
Speaker 1: John Durham's case. The unmistakable impression is that this indictment
22:19
Speaker 1: is designed to smear Christopher Steele's intelligence reports as things
22:25
Speaker 1: that were deliberately made up and concocted by rascally Democrats.
22:29
Speaker 1: The Steel dossier may seem like a mere footnote of
22:32
Speaker 1: the incredibly complicated saga that once dominated our national politics.
22:36
Speaker 1: But now that it's wild chargers are being further discredited,
22:39
Speaker 1: many in the media have lost interest. You want to
22:43
Speaker 1: know how much they've lost interest. CNN's Brian Skelpter. He
22:48
Speaker 1: is the guy whose entire job is to police the media,
22:55
Speaker 1: tell the stories about the media, the big stories that
22:57
Speaker 1: happen each week. He has a history of ignoring stories
23:03
Speaker 1: that would make Democrats and liberal news outlets organizations like
23:07
Speaker 1: his own CNN look bad. It's a bombshell media story
23:15
Speaker 1: in the media world that the Washington Post had to
23:18
Speaker 1: go back and correct years and remove large chunks of
23:22
Speaker 1: its own reporting on a discredited Clinton dossier. Americans, by
23:29
Speaker 1: the way, rely on CNN right for their news. They
23:33
Speaker 1: pushed this for four years. I know, I was there
23:36
Speaker 1: the entire time, fighting back and defending Trump and defending
23:40
Speaker 1: these ridiculous allegations. CNN's media program is called Reliable Sources.
23:48
Speaker 1: If you want such show, you wouldn't even know any
23:51
Speaker 1: of this happened because they ignored it. So roniccket's named
23:56
Speaker 1: reliable Sources right. They claim to examine their words, not
24:01
Speaker 1: mine the top media stories every Sunday. So the Washington
24:05
Speaker 1: Post adding editors notes, amending headlines, and removing sections of
24:09
Speaker 1: major stories that didn't make the cut when it came
24:14
Speaker 1: to truth, we're actually cut by CNN. The Post corrections
24:20
Speaker 1: came as other news outlets, including CNN, have criticized have
24:27
Speaker 1: been criticized, I should say, for failing to adjust reporting
24:30
Speaker 1: after the Special Councilderham's investigation the Trump Russia probe has
24:35
Speaker 1: further discredited the r already shaky dot sier now the
24:39
Speaker 1: point where people are getting indicted. Reliable Sources Right, which
24:44
Speaker 1: got a pretty big audience six forty five thousand viewers
24:46
Speaker 1: last week, granted that was its smallest audience of the year,
24:51
Speaker 1: ignored the scandal because it made Democrats and CNN look bad.
24:58
Speaker 1: Instead of covering the post massive and significant corrections because
25:02
Speaker 1: they were in on this collusion with Russia. CNN and
25:06
Speaker 1: Sculptor were in on it from day one. They wanted
25:08
Speaker 1: to bring down Trump at all costs. I didn't care
25:10
Speaker 1: what lies I had to tell you. Instead, you know
25:15
Speaker 1: what they did said covering this issue, CNN treated viewers
25:21
Speaker 1: to segment after segment about Steve Bannon. Yeah, they did
25:28
Speaker 1: segments about Brian Williams leaving MSNBC. They did a segment
25:32
Speaker 1: on Steve Bannon's podcast whether or not Americans should believe
25:36
Speaker 1: inflation headlines even though inflation is real. American journalist Any
25:42
Speaker 1: Finster being jailed, demere Mark and Britney Spears in a
25:46
Speaker 1: local newspaper fighting to survive. That is what they reported
25:50
Speaker 1: on during their media watchdog show Reliable Sources. Skelpter avoided
25:57
Speaker 1: the significant media story on his program because it didn't fit.
26:04
Speaker 1: They don't want to tell people that they lied to you,
26:06
Speaker 1: And they don't want to tell people that Donald Trump
26:09
Speaker 1: is innocent and that the people that were around and
26:12
Speaker 1: that were harassed and their lives were being pushed. People
26:15
Speaker 1: were trying to ruin their lives. That's really what we're
26:17
Speaker 1: talking about here. People were trying to ruin their lives,
26:20
Speaker 1: and people's lives were ruined financially. Certainly, they just wanted
26:25
Speaker 1: to look the other way. That's all they wanted to
26:29
Speaker 1: do was look the other way. Look the other way
26:33
Speaker 1: at all costs, and make sure that we never tell
26:36
Speaker 1: people that we lied because we ultimately got what we wanted.
26:39
Speaker 1: We got rid of Trump. That was our goal, and
26:41
Speaker 1: we accomplished it. We did it. That was the objective,
26:46
Speaker 1: and we accomplished it. Why would we tell you that
26:49
Speaker 1: the entire thing was a fraud. Why on earth would
26:54
Speaker 1: we tell you that the entire thing was a fraud.
26:58
Speaker 1: The same thing they did with d House. By the way,
27:02
Speaker 1: there's no difference here. Look at how they've attacked written House.
27:07
Speaker 1: You know, the media is bracing for the closing arguments
27:09
Speaker 1: in that trial. Why because they know they lied to you.
27:13
Speaker 1: They said the guy was a white supremacist murderer who
27:16
Speaker 1: wanted to know as a Trump supporter, even though there's
27:19
Speaker 1: nothing to back that up. Doesn't matter, right, because this
27:22
Speaker 1: is what we do now. The media all we can
27:26
Speaker 1: along was saying the only reason Written House will walk
27:29
Speaker 1: is because the judge sucks and he's white. That's what
27:33
Speaker 1: they're now saying. I don't see how anybody can say
27:36
Speaker 1: that this judge is not biased and is not leaning
27:40
Speaker 1: in a certain direction. I think that the behavior of
27:42
Speaker 1: the judge in totality is the problem. Is judge is
27:45
Speaker 1: an absolute joke. He's been a joke from the very beginning. Clearly,
27:49
Speaker 1: this guy has biases that are affecting the administration of
27:52
Speaker 1: this case. I completely agree from my observation that the
27:55
Speaker 1: judge is entirely biased. The judge is making it pretty
27:59
Speaker 1: much impossible will for the jury to actually consider all
28:03
Speaker 1: the facts and come up with a verdict where justice
28:07
Speaker 1: will be served. You've tweeted and talked about the fact
28:10
Speaker 1: that the judge is racist, and you think that impacts
28:14
Speaker 1: how he is managing this trial. He has made a
28:17
Speaker 1: series of decisions, each one perhaps may be individually defensible,
28:21
Speaker 1: but in totality lead to the impression of a biased,
28:26
Speaker 1: racist judge. Bias and racist. So a white guy shoots
28:30
Speaker 1: people in self defense, A white guy shoots white guys
28:34
Speaker 1: in self defense, not even not black people, white people
28:37
Speaker 1: in self defense, and we don't like the outcome because
28:42
Speaker 1: it's a white guy that defended himself after convicted felons
28:45
Speaker 1: who had illegal guns pointed the guns at him and
28:47
Speaker 1: tried to kill him, and he defended himself, all caught
28:50
Speaker 1: on tape. Well, it's a white racist judge. If it's
28:53
Speaker 1: a narrative, let's keep going with it on national TV
28:55
Speaker 1: all day long with his Trump rally cell phone that
29:00
Speaker 1: is trying to get rid the house a walk, God
29:03
Speaker 1: Bless the USA ring tone, which is the I love
29:08
Speaker 1: this right you got the guy's ring tone goes off it.
29:13
Speaker 1: He's a guy that represents his country, he serves his country.
29:18
Speaker 1: He has a ring tone that is about God Bless America,
29:22
Speaker 1: God Bless the USA. And now they say it's a
29:25
Speaker 1: Trump breading tone. This is how much they hate America.
29:27
Speaker 1: By the way, this goes back to exactly what I'm
29:29
Speaker 1: saying connectness with this Clinton story. They hate America this much,
29:33
Speaker 1: You need to understand that. This is how much they
29:36
Speaker 1: hate America. They despise America, They cannot stand America. You're
29:47
Speaker 1: now the worst person in the world, the worst person
29:55
Speaker 1: in the world if you love America. And if you're
29:59
Speaker 1: a judge who doesn't convict somebody of a crime that
30:03
Speaker 1: the media says you need to convict them of, you're
30:06
Speaker 1: a racist judge and you're a Trump judge, and you're evil.
30:09
Speaker 1: They've just moved on from the Clinton dossiers straight into this.
30:12
Speaker 1: This will be the new controversy in Kenosha when when
30:15
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse and the jury comes back with their decision. If
30:18
Speaker 1: they don't get what they want, this is what they'll
30:20
Speaker 1: say for months. So use this as an election issue.
30:22
Speaker 1: White kid walked, he killed two white people that attacked him.
30:25
Speaker 1: Nothing wrong with that's called self defense. Judge is auditioning
30:29
Speaker 1: for the cameras and looking for his next gig on
30:30
Speaker 1: Fox News. He sounds like he's watched too much Bill O'Reilly.
30:33
Speaker 1: I mean he's acting like Archie Bunker in there. When
30:36
Speaker 1: the judge asked the entire room if there are any
30:38
Speaker 1: veterans here and demands that the entire room clap for
30:41
Speaker 1: a veteran, and the one veteranan room happens to be
30:44
Speaker 1: the expert witness coming forth to testify on behalf of
30:47
Speaker 1: Kyle Rittenhouse. That's an example of a pretty biased courtroom.
30:50
Speaker 1: How the guy talked about the lunch order. I don't
30:53
Speaker 1: get it. Asian joke. I don't get it. I don't
30:56
Speaker 1: know that he even made an Asian joke. Well, I
30:59
Speaker 1: know that I'm not allowed to judge it because I'm
31:01
Speaker 1: not Asian. The judge has had so many moments in
31:03
Speaker 1: this case that bring into question his own biases. Whether
31:08
Speaker 1: it's the ring tone, whether it's the Asian statement, whether
31:13
Speaker 1: it's the applause. You mentioned the applause for a defense
31:16
Speaker 1: witness because he was a veteran. Those things really impact
31:20
Speaker 1: people's feeling that that this is a courtroom that we
31:22
Speaker 1: can have to trust him. This guy. Maybe you know
31:27
Speaker 1: legally he's right about things. I've been listening to the
31:29
Speaker 1: legal folks, but certainly his demeanor, the way he speaks
31:33
Speaker 1: to the prosecution, the way he looks at Kyle Rittenhouse
31:36
Speaker 1: like as his grandson. I mean, come on, America, he
31:40
Speaker 1: looks at him like he's his grandson. I mean, you
31:45
Speaker 1: want to talk about insanity. This is the media. Don't
31:50
Speaker 1: ever trust him. Look at whether it's the Clinton story
31:53
Speaker 1: or the Rittenhouse story. They do the same thing over
31:55
Speaker 1: and over again. They decide their narrative and they stick
31:59
Speaker 1: with it, regardless of the facts. And they don't care
32:01
Speaker 1: if you burn in hell because of it. They don't
32:03
Speaker 1: care if you get the death penalty because of it.
32:04
Speaker 1: They don't care if you get locked up for the
32:06
Speaker 1: rest of your life because of it. They don't care.
32:09
Speaker 1: They don't care. I hope every one of you will
32:12
Speaker 1: share this deep dive expose Part six go back if
32:15
Speaker 1: you miss part one, two, three, or four on this
32:18
Speaker 1: Clinton deep dive. Make sure you like our podcasts and subscribe.
32:22
Speaker 1: It's free. Hit that auto download button or subscribe, and
32:25
Speaker 1: please share it on social media. I'll see you, but
32:28
Speaker 1: guys back here tomorrow