Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / PART 3: THE CLINTON DEEP STATE SWAMP IS COMING DOWN AFTER NEW DURHAM INDICTMENTS!

Transcript

PART 3: THE CLINTON DEEP STATE SWAMP IS COMING DOWN AFTER NEW DURHAM INDICTMENTS! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: This is going to be part three of our deep
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: dive into the Durham Investigation. I'm going to ask you
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: all to make sure that you share our podcasts with
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: your family and friends. We are spending day after day
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: doing a deep dive into the Durham Report and this investigation,
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: these indictments because the media is not covering this on purpose,
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: because the information coming out is so damning. Now coming
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: up in a moment, we are going to actually talk
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: with us Center Marsha Blackburn. She is one of forty
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: four Republican centers that are demanding the Durham Report actually
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: be made public. Why, because we need to know what's
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: actually happening now. This group of forty four Republican centers
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: has still not heard back after demanding that the report
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: by the Special Council be made public once it is complete,
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: this coming days after news service that it will likely
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: be finished in the coming months. Lawmakers led by Center
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: Marcha Blackburn and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have penned
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: a letter to the Attorney General Merrick Garland with no response,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: requesting an update on the status of the Durham Review. Now,
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: why is he not responding because he doesn't want you
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: to see what's in the Durham report. This Durham review
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: dubbed the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation, and for the final report
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: to be made public, they say, is vitally important for
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: transparency and for the American people to see just how
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: corrupt our government is. Quote. We ask that you provide
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: an update on the status of the Special Council on
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: Durham's inquiry, and that the investigations report be made available
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: to the public upon completion, the lawmakers wrote in their letter.
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: Now you got forty four senators writing this letter, you'd
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: think that Durham would respond. He still hasn't. Durham, by
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: the way, he previously served as US Attorney for the
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: District of Connecticut before becoming Special Counsel last year, has
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: been reviewing the FBI's investigation Rusha's influence in the twenty
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: sixteen elections since twenty nineteen, when he was tasked by
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: the Trent administration to evaluate the bureau's probe. Durham's doing
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: his job. We should see what all he's done now.
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: Durham resigned as the US attorney after Biden took office,
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: which is routine for political appointed federal prosecutors, but he
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: was kept on a special council so he could continue
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: his probe. Now, the investigation made huge headlines right after
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: The Wall Street Journey reported that not only is Durham
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: presented the grand jury, but they're indicting people. So why
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: is it that the man who's in charge, Garland, is
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: not responding to all these senators. It's part of the
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: bigger question. Last night on Tuger Carlson, there was a
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: very interesting conversation with Armit Dylan. She appeared on Tuger
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: Carlson to discussed this Durham investigation and certain aspects of
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: what we're seeing. Now. I want you to take a listen. Well,
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: it's been more than two years since US Attorney John
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: Durham was assigned to investigate the origins of the Russia
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: collusion hoax. His investigation has already gone on longer than
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: the Mueller investigation. For months, it seemed like there was
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: nothing to show for it. Then Durham charged a Clinton
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: campaign attorney called Michael Sussman for lying to the FBI
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen about the Trump campaign's ties to Russia.
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: Sussman was indicted by a federal grand jury. What does
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: this mean exactly? It's more interesting than it sounds. Harmat
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: Dylan has the details. She's a famous civil rights attorney
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: and a good person. She joins us now to discuss
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: what this is. Harman, thanks so much for coming on.
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: So what have we learned from this indictment? Well, the
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: indictment is a really interesting document, twenty seven pages long,
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: and as you say, it's the first major indictment that
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: has been sought by John Durham after two years. The
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: core of the allegation is a kind of a flimsy one.
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: It's what they call a process crime, and namely, it's
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: that this Clinton lawyer line when he went to the
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: FBI General Council at the time, James Baker, and told
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: him that he had this story about the Trump organization
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: communicating with Russians at a Russian bank at the Alpha
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: Bank via a sort of secret node on a server,
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: all of which was concocted as a lie. But the
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: lie that he's being indicted for is that he allegedly
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: told the FBI General Council that he was volunteering this
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: information to the FBI and a big written report as
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: a citizen not on behalf of any particular campaign or candidate.
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: Now you know, in real life his law firm and
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: he specifically worked for the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee.
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: He was partners with Mark Elias, the Democrat super lawyer
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: who's out there sewing every state that tries to reprove
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: election integrity. So you have to believe in this indictment
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: that the FBI General Council took on face value that
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: this guy was doing this as a citizen. I think
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: that's a real stretch. So I don't know whether this
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: is going to end up resulting in a conviction or not.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: The law firm and the lawyer are denying this, and
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: the star witness, James Baker, now works for Twitter, and
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: he is not necessarily cooperating. He's saying, I can't remember
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: this exchange exactly. So this is all premised on some
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: notes of another lawyer that James Baker allegiently spoke to.
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: I love by the way that he's working for Twitter.
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: Now you notice how this corruption keeps getting and breeding
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: more corruption, right, like the lawyer who you need your
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: main witness, Like, oh, I work for Twitter now I'm
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: making the big bucks. You know, we censor people for
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: a living. I can't remember a whole lot about this.
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: I'm real foggy, folks. I'm just foggy. Now. I got
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: me a big job, now, right, I did, I did
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: my duty, did my job, got rid of Trump. Now
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: I'm at Twitter. Twitter got rid of Trump too. In
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: that ironic I'm a big time lawyer. I can't remember
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Jack Crapp right now, now you you connect all these dots,
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: you notice now what we're seeing. They're going to stonewall
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: anybody that gets indicted and just say, can't remember, can't remember,
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: can't remember it working, the State Department, can't remember working,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: the DJ can't remember working the FBI, can't remember. I'm
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: James Comey. Can't remember. But what's in this indictment is
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: super interesting, and it hearkens back to what we know
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: about the Steel dossier and about the pack of lies
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: that the Clinton team told the world, told journalists, told
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: you know, law enforcement about the Steel dossier. They denied
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: they were behind that and all of these allegations about
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: Russia collusion, and in fact, they funded it with Fusion GPS,
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: this law firm funded it. And in this case they
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: similarly have denied they had anything to do with this
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: allegation about the Alpha Bank, when in fact, this indictment
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: shows like every single time that they had a meeting
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: about this with the FBI, with these tech executives and
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: so forth, they build for it. So the billing records
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: are actually the paper trail. But you see some remarks
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: in this indictment, and I, by the way, let's just
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: stop there to what she said, because this is huge information.
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: So when these guys were presenting all this information to
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: the media, having meetings with the FBI, having meetings with others,
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: the entire time, they were billing the Clinton team, the
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: Clinton campaign for those hours. So the idea that they
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: were working as private citizens, no, the idea that they
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: just like had this random stuff putting their lap, No,
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: that didn't happen, folks. They were working on the clock
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: and billing every single time there was a meeting, time
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: after time after time, we got more meetings the FBI.
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: Let's bill the Clinton campaion. We know that this is crap, right,
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: We know that this is a lie. Where the ones
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: creating the lie, where the ones doing the lie. We're
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: the ones pushing the lie. The only collusion in the
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: Russian collusion case was literally the Clinton campaign fusing GPS,
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: the DNC who paid for a fake story. You want
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: to know who was trying to influence the election, It
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: was Lry Clinton. It was a DNC, and they knew
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: they were lying about it, every bit of it. They
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: knew they were lying about it, every single bit of it.
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: And that's exactly what she's saying here in this interview.
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: Encourage your viewers to read it. That show that people
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: involved in this conspiracy, and it was a multi factor
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: conspiracy involving tech executive who wanted to get a job
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: with the Clinton White House, his companies, and others that
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: they were afraid that their bag of dirty twicks was
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: going to come out. And so that's the part that's
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: very interesting. Not only that, did you notice what she
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: just said people were actually getting jobs by doing this
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: dirty work Hillary Clinton. It was like, Hey, if we
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: make sure Hillary Clinton gets into the White House and
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: we put a conspiracy out there that helps her get there,
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: then we're going to get a job at the White House.
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: Then we can go back to the private sector and
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: make a crap ton of money. We've clearly now seen
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: exactly how this conspiracy to overthrow the will of the
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: people played out in the personal interests of individuals involved.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: We now know that big tech executives were helping the
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: Clinton campaign push out a narrative that Donald Trump colluded
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: with the Russians so they could get jobs in the
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: Clinton White House. Hillary Clinton became president, then they knew
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: that Donald Trump was a threat to big tech, so
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: they decided to continue to go along with it to
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: make sure they could get rid of Donald Trump, which
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: is exactly why they kicked him off Twitter, and they
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: kicked him off every other everything out there right after
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: he lost the election, because then they said, all right,
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: he didn't have power. Now we'll silence and to make
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: sure you didn't get power back, and we'll silence anyone
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: else that we don't like. And the Democrats will protect us.
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: And we know that, right the Democrats will protect us.
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: And that's exactly what they've done. We know that none
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: of these big Tex individuals have been held accountable. Tom
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: Fitton Judicial Watch, talking about Hillary Clinton campaign implicated in
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: this New Durham indictment, he asked a couple of basic
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: questions which I think we should all be asking right now,
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: and they are this, and here are the questions. He said,
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: each and every one of us should be asking, is
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: Durham gonna do more? I don't know he should. He
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: should question Hillary Clinton before a grand jury. He should
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: question Joe Bidendare I say it before a grand jury,
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: and of course the head of the grand conspiracy, Barack Obama.
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: Now you hear what he said there about Barack Obama,
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: He's right. Every one of the people he just mentioned
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: are players in this conspiracy. And we now know that
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: from the Durham investigation. We know it. What Tom Fitton
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: said about this the Judicial Watch, and they've done amazing work,
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: is this is a conspiracy that implies that implicates the FBI,
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: the DOJ, the CIA, Barack Obama for spying on a candidate,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: the FBI director for allowing these fis A warrants, and
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: others who went and got these fise A warrants. Anne
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. This is bigger than Watergate. Once you hear
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: a little bit more of what Tom fittn had jused
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: to watch the president had to say. Truth behind the
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: worst government corruption scandal in American history in terms of
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: political criminality, that is the targeting of candidate Trump and
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: then President Trump and people around him and John Durham,
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: the special counsel who became he was essentially, you know,
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: just a regular prosecutor looking at this and just before
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: he left turn of General barmaide him a special counsel,
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: he finally indicted someone else. And this someone else is
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: a big deal. It's Michael Sussman, who is a lawyer
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: or I had been a lawyer for the law firm
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: of Perkins Cooyee who and that's the firm behind the dossier.
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: And it's also the go to firm for the Democratic Party.
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: So Sessman was the lawyer for Hillary Clinton's campaign, the
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: lawyer for the Democratic Party, namely the Department excuse me,
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: the Democratic National Committee. And he had a special meeting
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: shortly before the election in twenty sixteen with the General
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: Counsel of the FBI General Council, Baker who, in which
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: they discussed targeting Trump and specifically he alleged in this
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: meeting and gave him documentation according to the indictment that
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: was just issued this week by the Grand Jury or
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: returned this week by the Grand Jury at the requested Durham,
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: he was behind the idea that there was Russian Bank
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: had communications in proper communications or relationships, or there was
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: some sort of Internet communication that raised questions with the
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: Trump organization. And you may recall the media ran with
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: that Alpha Banking, Russian banking, the Trump people have been connected. Well,
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: he was indicted. Susman was not for lying about that specifically,
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: but for lying about the reason he was there, because
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: allegedly he told Baker he was there just as a citizen,
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: just conveying information he thought the FBI should pursued. He
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: withheld from Baker, according to the indictment, that he was
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: there on behalf of Hillary Clinton, the Clinton campaign, Democratic
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: National Committee, etc. So he lied about the reason and
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: the purpose of the meeting. And when you lie to
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: the FBI, it's a crime. That's why you don't talk
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: to the FBI unless you have a lawyer present and
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: the lawyer advises you completely of what your rights are.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: Even then, so he's meeting with this lawyer. First of all,
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: the meeting should let me be clear here, let's take
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: a step back. This meeting should never have taken place.
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: You know Susan as a DOJ He had used to
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: work at the Department of Justice, so he knows everybody,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: and he gets to get into meetings like this to
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: shop garbage like this, and what the indict and I
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: encourage you to review the indictment. It's available widely online
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: and read it yourself. And what's interesting about it is
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: that there's let me just jump back in here, Tom Fitt.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: And the reason why I'm playing this for you is
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: because he's laying this out the legal case. He just
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: made a point that this meeting to shop this propaganda
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: should have never even happened. And the only reason why
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: it happens because he had the connections and the people
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: that he met with should have stopped the meeting from
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: taking place because it was so far fetched. It should
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: have never happened. So the people in the meeting, there's
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: no way to not make the argument. They decided to
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: become part of the conspiracy. Okay, they decided that it's
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: a good idea to become a part of this conspiracy. Hey,
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: we want to overthrow the president United States of America. Okay,
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: how you want to do it. I've got something I'm
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: shopping to you and I want you guys to use
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: us to investigate Donald Trump. It's total crap. We made
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: it up. Actually I wrote it, paid forward by the
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: Clinton campaign and the DNC. That's just kind of how
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: we roll. Now. We make up stuff. It's really good
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: stuff we've made up, and I want you guys to
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: investigate this now. Anybody meeting with him would have known
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: that this was crap from the very beginning. And in fact,
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: we know the FBI knew it was crap in January,
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: like official it was. They knew it was total crap
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: in January twenty seventeen, the same month Donald Trump was
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: horn in. And yet they actively used this information not
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: only to spy on the president and the president elect
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: in his campaign and to get those fist A warrants, okay,
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: number one, that number two, they also continue to use
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: the bad information on purpose. Why do they decide to
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: do it on purpose? Because why not? Right, Why would
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: you not do this on purpose? It's too good to
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: not use. You hate Trump, you hate people around him.
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: You got people wanting jobs in the Clinton campaign or
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: in the Biden administration. You know, we gotta get rid
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: of Trump for me to get my big paydays to
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: go work for big tech. Like some of these guys
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: are now working as legal counsel at Twitter. Wonderful. It's
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: because of the all their government connections, or hey, I mean,
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: think about your resume. I'm so good at my job.
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: I actually was able to get a guy impeached on
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: bad information that I wrote and created pretty nice resume
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: builder there. If someone wants to hire a hack, political hack,
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: an assassin, political assassin, somebody with great and grand connections.
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: Fittin's right, this meeting should have never hadn't happened ever,
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: But it did. It happened because he had the connections,
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: and the people in the government he had the connections
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: with were more than happy to help spread lies and
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: propaganda overthrow the will of the people. You know. The
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: one charge really about making a false making the false statement,
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: but the two dozen pages describing an illicit conspiracy targeting
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump, they all knew that there was no there there.
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: When it came to the allegation that the Russian bank
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: had a connection to the Trump organization through these Internet
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: connections that they were pretending were happening, they said it
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: was a red herring. In fact, it turned out there
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: was nothing. The FBI figured out rather quickly, and they
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: knew that going in, and in fact, there's email communications
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: detailed in the indictment showing that they were discussing how
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: to make the document they were going to give the
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: General Council of the FBI plausible on its face, so
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: that at least initially someone could say, oh, there's something here,
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: even though they all knew that in essence, it was
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: a host. And the indictment lays out how the Clinton
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: campaign colluded on this, how Fusion GPS colluded on this.
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: It looks like Hillary's other lawyer colluded on this. So
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: the question is is this going to be the last
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: gasp of Doorham or the beginning of something more by
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: door I don't know the answer to that. It would
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: be seemingly unusual for me. Unusual to me to have
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: all that material about what looks to be other criminal
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: activity that isn't charged here and just leave it there
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: for no future action. There should be future action. Joining
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: me to talk about what future action should take place
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: is a United States Center that's leading on this issue.
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: Senator Blackburn. I appreciate you coming on today to talk about,
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: obviously this very important Durham report. Senator I want to
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: start with this. We have seen the media actually criticizing
• 19:14
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden over the last few days on the economy,
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: on the border crisis, on other issues, specifically at CNN,
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: just to make sure I think that they don't get
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: indicted for what they did as part of this grand
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: conspiracy to I say, overthrow the will of the people
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: in the election. We now know from the Durham Report
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: or the Durham investigation, that the FBI knew in January
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: of twenty and seventeen, the same month Donald Trump was
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: sworn in that this entire Russian Collusia invest collusion investigation
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: was total crap, paid for and written by the DNC
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: and the Clinton campaign. And yet they still went and investigated,
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: and they still set perjury traps for people at General
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: Winn and they still send FBI agents out there to
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: try to arrest people and to indict people around Donald Trump,
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: knowing the entire basis was a lie created by the
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: Clinton campaign. How are they getting away with us still
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: to this day? And this is one of the reasons
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: backing up a little bit that I after talking with
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: President Trump the suburb and we weren't getting an update
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: on the Durham investigation. Back at the first of August,
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: I led a letter and got forty four Republican senators
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: on this letter to General Attorney General Merrick Garland asking
• 20:47
  Speaker 1: for a status check on the Durham investigation and asking
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: that the results of the investigation be made public. Well,
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: Attorney General Garland has not responded to that letter with
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: a written response. But what we did do was be
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: able to say, hey, look, there's forty four of us
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: and we are watching and we want to get an
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: update on what is happening with the Durham investigation. That
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: sent a message. And of course since then you have
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: had Durham go to the grand jury and get this indictment,
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: and now we're beginning to see what happened. But then
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: we weren't going to let this go. And for the President,
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: I was not going to let this go. I he
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: deserves an answer, the American people deserve an answer. And
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: I wanted to be certain that we get to the
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: bottom of this and that you didn't let this special
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: Consol's time and funding expire and not began to expose it.
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: But you're exactly right. They have not covered this now.
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: Back in the summer, they did not cover that forty
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: four senators had sent this letter and were requesting this
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: update on behalf of President Donald Trump. Yeah, Senator, you
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: look at this. This is and I don't even think
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: this is an opinion anymore. I think it's just a fact.
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: This is way beyond the level of what we saw
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: with conspiracy with Watergate, for example. I believe truly that
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: today in the front page of every newspaper America, there
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: should be four or five stories. Number one, what did
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton o? When did she know it? Why did
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: she not inform the FBI that they were they were
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: trying to overthrow the will of the people. Why is
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: it that the FBI Director James Comey allowed for his
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: FBI to weaponize something based on lies that they knew
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: were lies. Why was it that they were trying to
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: put people in jail over this? Not only that the
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: media knew, right, CNN actually hired the people from the FBI,
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: from the DOJ, from the CIA that knew that this
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: was all alike to then commentate on the lie that
• 23:18
  Speaker 1: was about overthrowing the outcome of an election. The number
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: of stories that should be written and none of them
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: are being written. Is anyone going to be held accountable
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: for any of this? Certainly we intend for people to
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: be held accountable for this. This is why We're continuing
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: to go after Attorney General Merrick Garland to be certain
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: that we get this information out in the public so
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: that people know. You know, if we hadn't been pushing
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: this ben they may never have had the information go
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: to the great injury. But what you have is the
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: FBI and people at the FBI that were complicit in this.
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: Now they're supposed to be the best law enforcement agency
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: on the face of the earth, and look at what
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: they did here. Look at the number of missteps that
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: are coming forward that the FBI took, not only in
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: Russia collusion, but you've got other things that we're covering
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: where they have not done their job. Last week we
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: had the Larry Nasser trial. We had the female gymnast
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: in front of us, and the FBI in the way
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: they fumbled that. And today the Wall Street Journal has
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: an editorial in about this. We the federal government is
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: to be impartial, and it is to be equal treatment,
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: equal justice. But these bureaucracies here in Washington, DC have
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: become so bloated and so incestuous that now their partisan
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: Look at what they did in this election, look at
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: how they conducted themselves, look at how they fought against
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump. This is why I fight every single day,
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: or transparency, for equal treatment, for the government to do
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: their job to protect the people, not to pick winners
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: and losers, not to be partisan, but to fulfill their
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: constitutional duty. Let's talk about the FISA court warrants for
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: just a second, because my next question is are there
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: any protections now or stop gaps to make sure that
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: you can't spy on any one's campaign. It could be
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: your campaign for Senate, It could be a governor's campaign,
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: It could be it could be a state campaign, it
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: could be the presidential campaign. Again, the fact that we
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: had FI suc court warrants that were approved under the
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: Obama administration on information that they had confirmed was a lie, fabricated,
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: created and written by the Clinton campaign, and yet they
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: still were able to do this. Or is there any
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: protection now to say or any stop gaps now to say, Okay,
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: you're never going to be able to do this again,
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: or can they go and do this all over again
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: if they want to. We certainly hope that they are
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: stop gaps that are in place. Having to present that
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: evidence to the FI succort is something that you know
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: certainly is important to do and tightening up that process,
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: which is something that was done last Congress that is
• 27:07
  Speaker 1: in place. But there again, you know, Ben, when you've
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: got people that are so partisan and they are corrupt,
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: and you look at some of these players, James Comey
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: at the top, that felt like they were above the
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: law and there was a separate system of rules that
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: applied to them and therefore they could move forward and
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: do what they were going to do. It is character
• 27:41
  Speaker 1: flaws and rotten character to the core. I want to
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: switch gears quickly to the border because I think it's important,
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: and we've got about two minutes left with you. But
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: what we're witnessing at the border right now is a
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: humanitarian crisis. It's a COVID crisis. And yesterday what we
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: saw in the headlines was we're going to investigate the
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: border patrol agents who are on horseback who were trying
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: to stop Hatians from coming the country. Of course, they
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: claim that all these people are good people, and then
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: we find out hours later that a bunch of them
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: got on a bus, massive fight broke out and then
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: they actually attacked and assaulted border patrol agents. They then
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: had to send a Biden administration and I say this,
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: you know, almost just rolling my eyes. But they actually
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: sent caged buses to then put the Haitians in. Where's
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: AOC crying at the at these buses? Right? We put
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: adults in cages, as my point, And this is the
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: story that comes out of us. And then we find
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: out that they're just releasing Haitians now into the general
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: public with a quote court date to appear. Yes. And
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: then I will tell you this from women in Tennessee
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: security moms, we are hearing so much concern about this.
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: They are sending migrants, whether they are from the southern
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: border or they're Afghanistan refugees that we're not properly vetted,
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: that are not a part of the SIV process. They're
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: just being sent to states and communities. This is done
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: without information being sent to local and state officials. So
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: many women have contacted me. They're concerned about the outbreak
• 29:27
  Speaker 1: of measles that we have seen, They're concerned about COVID,
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: They're concerned about other diseases that are coming in. They're
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: reading some of these blog posts that border patrol families
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: are posting and the concerns that they are expressing. Their
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: hearing from people that live in Del Rio, Texas and
• 29:54
  Speaker 1: what they are seeing on the ground, and people are saying,
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: we have to put a stop to this. We have,
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: We've got to and that and I couldn't agree with
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: you more. Don't forget. Tell your family and your friends
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: about this podcast. Share this podcast on social media. You'll
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: see that little green air, that little share button. You
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: can share it right now and share this with your
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: family and your friends. Part four we'll be up tomorrow,
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: so again, subscribe to the podcast. It's free to subscribe,
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: listen each and every day, and we'll expose even more
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: of the Durm Report tomorrow