Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Schumer's Plan to Nuke the Constitution to Avoid Mayorkas Impeachment & Hide Dem's Open Borders Catastrophe

Transcript

Schumer's Plan to Nuke the Constitution to Avoid Mayorkas Impeachment & Hide Dem's Open Borders Catastrophe · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Welcome.
• 0:04
  Speaker 2: It is verdict with Senator Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with
• 0:07
  Speaker 2: you and Senator it is going to be a very
• 0:10
  Speaker 2: big fight in the Senate with my orcis impeachment, and
• 0:14
  Speaker 2: it's something you're going to be leading this fight for
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: the next couple of weeks as Democrats hope that they
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: can just make all this go away.
• 0:21
  Speaker 3: Well, that's exactly right.
• 0:22
  Speaker 4: We're days away from the House transmitting to the Senate
• 0:25
  Speaker 4: the articles of impeachment against Alejandro Majorcas. This was absolutely
• 0:28
  Speaker 4: the right thing for the House to do, and the
• 0:31
  Speaker 4: Senate under Chuck Schumer, the Democrats are trying to do
• 0:35
  Speaker 4: something utterly unprecedented.
• 0:36
  Speaker 3: They're trying to.
• 0:37
  Speaker 4: Blow up and destroy the Senate's impeachment power and responsibility.
• 0:42
  Speaker 4: They want to avoid a trial altogether. They want to
• 0:44
  Speaker 4: just table the matter at the outset. That has never
• 0:46
  Speaker 4: been done in over two hundred years of our nation's history.
• 0:49
  Speaker 4: It violates the Constitution. It is brazen.
• 0:52
  Speaker 3: We're going to talk about that at length.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's truly incredible, and especially what their demands are
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: on the Senate, we'll get to that part. You guys
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: aren't supposed to eat. That's a little bit of a preview.
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: We'll talk about that at a moment. I gotta tell
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: you it is overrated. That food is overrated. That's right,
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: you're not gonna eat at all. We got some great
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: out to you from that. I want to tell you.
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: By the way, I was watching the eclipse and it
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: was amazing, and got up early in the morning to
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: get ready and I got to share some Blackout coffee
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: with some friends and they loved it. If you want
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: a premium cup of coffee every day when you wake up,
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: you've got to check out Blackout Coffee. And there's not
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: just because it's premium, but you also get away from
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: the woke coffee brands that are out there, you know
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: the ones I'm talking about. I have to start my
• 1:40
  Speaker 2: day off with a great cup of coffee. And if
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: you are like me, you don't just want an average
• 1:43
  Speaker 2: cup of coffee. You want a premium cup of coffee.
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: You need to try Blackout Coffee. And I'm gonna save
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: you some money when you do this. Right now, let
• 1:50
  Speaker 2: me also be clear, Blackout Coffee is one hundred percent American,
• 1:54
  Speaker 2: zero percent woke. Okay, Blackout Coffee is one hundred percent
• 1:58
  Speaker 2: committed to conservative values. So if you like to spend
• 2:02
  Speaker 2: your money with companies that believe in what you believe in.
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: That's another reason to start your day with Blackout Coffee.
• 2:07
  Speaker 2: From the sourcing of the beans to the roasting process,
• 2:09
  Speaker 2: customer support, and shipping, they embody true American values, except
• 2:14
  Speaker 2: no compromise on taste or quality. So get rid of
• 2:18
  Speaker 2: that woke coffee cup you're using in the morning and
• 2:20
  Speaker 2: get Blackout Coffee. I'm gonna save you twenty percent. All
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: you gotta do is go right now to Blackoutcoffee dot
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: com slash verdict. That's Blackoutcoffee dot com slash vertict. Use
• 2:32
  Speaker 2: a coupon code vertict. You're gonna get twenty percent off
• 2:34
  Speaker 2: your first order, and you get to start your day
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: with a fabulous premium.
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: Cup of coffee.
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: Blackoutcoffee dot com slast vertict b awake, not twenty percent
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: off your first order.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: Use a coupon code vertict.
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: Senator, let's go back in time and lay out what
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: you said. I mean, it was months, if not a
• 2:53
  Speaker 2: year ago, you've been calling for the impeachment my Orcus
• 2:57
  Speaker 2: and giving the reasons.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: Why.
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: Let's go back and start there. Why did you say
• 3:03
  Speaker 2: that my Orcus should have been impeached. He was in
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: the House and lay out that argument first and foremost,
• 3:09
  Speaker 2: so people remember all of the issues here.
• 3:12
  Speaker 3: Well, it's been longer than a year.
• 3:14
  Speaker 4: It's been closer to two years that I've been calling
• 3:16
  Speaker 4: for the House to impeach Alejandro Mayorcus. What Mayorcus has
• 3:20
  Speaker 4: done on behalf of Joe Biden is utterly unprecedented. He
• 3:24
  Speaker 4: has aided and embedded the criminal invasion of this country
• 3:29
  Speaker 4: by ten point four million illegal immigrants. The volume of
• 3:33
  Speaker 4: it is qualitatively different than anything we've ever seen before
• 3:37
  Speaker 4: in our nation's history. It's the highest level of illegal immigration.
• 3:40
  Speaker 4: And understand, it's not that Alejandro Majorcis is incompetent, it's
• 3:45
  Speaker 4: not that he's negligent, it's not that he's bad at
• 3:47
  Speaker 4: his job. It is that he has decided to utterly
• 3:50
  Speaker 4: and completely defy federal law, to ignore, to violate federal law,
• 3:55
  Speaker 4: and to release millions and millions of illegal immigrants, including murderers,
• 3:59
  Speaker 4: in child molesters, including rapists. And by the way, the
• 4:02
  Speaker 4: illegal immigrants that he is releasing and that Joe Biden
• 4:05
  Speaker 4: is releasing, have gone on to murder people, to rape people,
• 4:08
  Speaker 4: to assault people, to commit horrific crimes, and that was
• 4:11
  Speaker 4: utterly predictable in this instance. The volume of it mayorcis.
• 4:18
  Speaker 4: It's not that he's trying to secure the border and
• 4:20
  Speaker 4: is just lousy at his job. It is that he
• 4:24
  Speaker 4: is actively trying to accelerate illegal immigration, to assist the
• 4:31
  Speaker 4: cartels and the human traffickers to process illegal immigrants faster.
• 4:36
  Speaker 4: Majorcis views his mission as growing ten point four million
• 4:40
  Speaker 4: illegal immigrants into twenty million, to thirty million into forty million,
• 4:44
  Speaker 4: and that is profoundly harmful to this country. It is
• 4:48
  Speaker 4: in complete defiance of federal law. It's why the House
• 4:51
  Speaker 4: impeached him, and now they are preparing to send the
• 4:55
  Speaker 4: articles of impeachment over to the Senate. And under the Constitution,
• 4:58
  Speaker 4: that triggers the Senate's responsibility to conduct a trial and
• 5:02
  Speaker 4: adjudicate whether he is guilty or not guilty.
• 5:06
  Speaker 2: If you look at the media, what they're saying right
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: now is, well, there may be a deal here to
• 5:12
  Speaker 2: make all this go away. And there was a shocking
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: statement that was put out by Chuck Schumer, sen up
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: majority leader, and this is what he said, and I
• 5:21
  Speaker 2: want people to listen carefully. He says that impeachment should
• 5:25
  Speaker 2: never be used to settle policy disagreements. Now, the big takeaway,
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: and I want your take on this, is he's admitting,
• 5:33
  Speaker 2: I think, for the first time publicly, this is the
• 5:35
  Speaker 2: policy of the Democratic Party to have wide open borders,
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: to have terrorists come in, to have cartel members controlling
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: the border making billions of dollars, and the human trafficking,
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: the sex trafficking, the fetanyl and everything. This is a
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: quote policy disagreement. They're admitting it.
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Listen, give you.
• 5:56
  Speaker 5: My colleagues's questions.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: You're going to offer a potion to dismiss them.
• 6:03
  Speaker 4: Charges on Thursday or two for you a conservative of
• 6:06
  Speaker 4: some Democrats, and tough races over that and.
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: Come back to the book.
• 6:10
  Speaker 5: Look, we're going to try and resolve this issue as
• 6:13
  Speaker 5: quickly as possible. Impeachment should never be used to settle
• 6:17
  Speaker 5: policy disagreements.
• 6:20
  Speaker 2: Yes, does that mean that this is going there might
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: be a date about some sort of a frameworkers, at
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: least hear from the managers.
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: What do you think is.
• 6:27
  Speaker 5: As I said, we're gonna we're going to try to
• 6:30
  Speaker 5: resolve this as quickly as possible. As I've said in
• 6:34
  Speaker 5: the past, it's absurd and there are no charges in
• 6:38
  Speaker 5: the House complaint that rise to the level of impeachment. Yes,
• 6:43
  Speaker 5: does that mean dismissing it or tabling? As I said,
• 6:47
  Speaker 5: we're gonna We're going to move forwards and resolve this
• 6:50
  Speaker 5: as quickly as possible. Once again, impeachment should never be
• 6:54
  Speaker 5: used to settle policy disagreements.
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: Yes, go ahead of his notes.
• 7:01
  Speaker 2: That was a pre planned line written out on paper. Clearly,
• 7:04
  Speaker 2: impeachment should never be used to settle policy disagreement. Set
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: it there three times. You listen and say that, and
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: I was just taken aback up my Well, at least
• 7:13
  Speaker 2: finally they're admitting it. This is our policy at open
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: border and to fundamentally change his country with lawlessness.
• 7:20
  Speaker 4: Yes, look the open borders of Joe Biden. It's not
• 7:24
  Speaker 4: just Joe Biden. It's Joe Biden, it's Kamala Harris, it's
• 7:27
  Speaker 4: every Senate Democrats, it's every House Democrat. The Democrat Party
• 7:33
  Speaker 4: as a collective have decided that open borders, that facilitating
• 7:36
  Speaker 4: the invasion of this country is good for them politically.
• 7:39
  Speaker 4: They look at the ten point four million illegals and
• 7:41
  Speaker 4: they say, hey, they're going to vote Democrat. There are
• 7:43
  Speaker 4: people some of them will vote illegally right now, and
• 7:46
  Speaker 4: they're hoping as many of them as possible to vote
• 7:47
  Speaker 4: illegally right now. But the rest of them, they believe, well,
• 7:50
  Speaker 4: we'll take power at some point and will grant amnesty
• 7:53
  Speaker 4: to all of them, will give voting rights to all
• 7:54
  Speaker 4: of them, and given that we allowed them to come illegally,
• 7:57
  Speaker 4: they're going to vote Democrat. That is their cynical power calculation. Now,
• 8:03
  Speaker 4: it was clear Schumer had two sentences written down that
• 8:06
  Speaker 4: he repeated over and over again. We're going to resolve
• 8:09
  Speaker 4: this as quickly as possible. Impeachment should not be used
• 8:12
  Speaker 4: for policy disputes. As you note, he's conceding that it
• 8:15
  Speaker 4: is the Democrats policy to have open borders and to
• 8:18
  Speaker 4: allow this invasion and allow criminals and terrorists to come
• 8:21
  Speaker 4: into this country and threaten Americans. He's conceding that, But
• 8:25
  Speaker 4: I want to focus on the other sentence he had
• 8:27
  Speaker 4: fifty percent of its comment was we're going to resolve
• 8:30
  Speaker 4: this as quickly as possible. And I want to put
• 8:34
  Speaker 4: this in the context of history, because under the Constitution,
• 8:38
  Speaker 4: the House has the sole power of impeachment to bring
• 8:41
  Speaker 4: in impeachment proceeding to vote out articles of impeachment, and
• 8:44
  Speaker 4: the Senate has the sole power to try impeachments and
• 8:49
  Speaker 4: the responsibility to try impeachments. Now, in our entire nation's
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: history over two hundred years, twenty one times, it's been
• 8:57
  Speaker 4: quite rare. The House of Representatives had voted out articles
• 9:01
  Speaker 4: of impeachment twenty one times. Alejandro Majorcis is only the
• 9:05
  Speaker 4: second cabinet secretary in history to be impeached. The first
• 9:10
  Speaker 4: was in eighteen seventy sixth the Secretary of War. It
• 9:13
  Speaker 4: has been one hundred and forty eight years since a
• 9:15
  Speaker 4: cabinet secretary was impeached, so impeaching cabinet secretary is a
• 9:18
  Speaker 4: big damn deal. Now, the twenty one times that the
• 9:23
  Speaker 4: House has sent articles of impeachment over to the Senate,
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: what has happened. Well, In three of them, the person
• 9:30
  Speaker 4: who was impeach left office was no longer in office,
• 9:33
  Speaker 4: and so the matter was moot once they were out
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: of office. Impeachment removes people from office, so there was
• 9:38
  Speaker 4: nothing further to do, so the Senate did not resolve
• 9:40
  Speaker 4: the ones once the individual had left office. In one
• 9:44
  Speaker 4: of them, the very first one ever, William Blount, who
• 9:46
  Speaker 4: was a Senator at the time, the Senate dismissed for
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: lack of jurisdiction. And what they concluded correctly is that
• 9:53
  Speaker 4: under the Constitution, you cannot impeach a a senator. That
• 9:58
  Speaker 4: the Constitution sets up impeachment as a remedy against executive
• 10:02
  Speaker 4: branch officials like the president, like Alejandro Majorcis, and it
• 10:07
  Speaker 4: sets up impeachment as a remedy against judicial officials. And
• 10:10
  Speaker 4: numerous judges have been impeached and removed from office over
• 10:14
  Speaker 4: our nation's history. But the Senate concluded in the very
• 10:16
  Speaker 4: first impeachment ever that it does not apply to a
• 10:19
  Speaker 4: member of Congress, that under the terms of the Constitution,
• 10:21
  Speaker 4: members of Congress are not covered by the impeachment power,
• 10:24
  Speaker 4: but rather the body's sole and exclusive power to expel
• 10:28
  Speaker 4: its members. So, of the twenty one times the House
• 10:33
  Speaker 4: has sent articles of impeachment, over four of them were
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: not adjudicated because the officeholder had left or there was
• 10:40
  Speaker 4: no jurisdiction. The other seventeen, every single time, one hundred
• 10:48
  Speaker 4: percent of the time, the Senate held a trial, the
• 10:52
  Speaker 4: Senate made an adjudication, and the Senate, every Senator, voted
• 10:55
  Speaker 4: guilty or not guilty. Now, let me tell you what
• 10:58
  Speaker 4: Chuck Schumer is planning to do. Chuck Schumer is planning
• 11:02
  Speaker 4: to at the very outset file a motion to table
• 11:06
  Speaker 4: the articles of impeachment. Now, this is an extraordinary act,
• 11:10
  Speaker 4: and this does enormous damage to the Constitution and to
• 11:14
  Speaker 4: the United States Senate. There's never been a motion to
• 11:17
  Speaker 4: table articles of impeachment over two hundred years of our
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: nation's history. It's never happened once. Chuck Schumer is getting
• 11:23
  Speaker 4: ready to do it. Why is he doing it? And
• 11:25
  Speaker 4: this is important to understand. There are three reasons Schumer
• 11:29
  Speaker 4: is planning to file a motion to table the articles
• 11:32
  Speaker 4: of impeachment. Reason number one, he wants to prevent the
• 11:36
  Speaker 4: house managers from presenting evidence. The house managers in an
• 11:41
  Speaker 4: impeachment trial, they come over, they present evidence, they lay
• 11:44
  Speaker 4: out the facts that support the impeachment. Chuck Schumer desperately, desperately,
• 11:49
  Speaker 4: desperately wants to avoid that evidence being put before the
• 11:52
  Speaker 4: American people. The second reason he plans to file a
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: motion to table is he wants to avoid a t
• 12:00
  Speaker 4: a trial terrifies him. Why because what's happening at the
• 12:03
  Speaker 4: border is an absolute travesty. It is a disaster, It
• 12:06
  Speaker 4: is indefensible no Democrat defends it.
• 12:10
  Speaker 3: They don't dispute it as.
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: Let me ask you this because it's it's such an
• 12:14
  Speaker 2: important point that you're making, and I want to make
• 12:16
  Speaker 2: sure that everybody understands it. You're saying that a trial
• 12:19
  Speaker 2: is such bad pr for Democrats running for reelection that
• 12:24
  Speaker 2: they're afraid that the question could get so brutal and
• 12:27
  Speaker 2: so ont of hand that those moments where they would
• 12:30
  Speaker 2: in theory be defending my arcers could be used against
• 12:33
  Speaker 2: them in their campaigns and TV ads and commercials and
• 12:36
  Speaker 2: things like that. So they don't want any of that
• 12:38
  Speaker 2: video or audio even available for people that might be
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: able to just say, see, look at Senator so and
• 12:44
  Speaker 2: so he's in favor of wide open borders and the
• 12:47
  Speaker 2: chaos in your communities right now, and here he is
• 12:49
  Speaker 2: defending it.
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: Well.
• 12:51
  Speaker 4: Look, that's the third reason that he wants a motion
• 12:54
  Speaker 4: at table is he doesn't want the Democrats who are
• 12:56
  Speaker 4: running for reelection this year to have to vote guilty
• 13:00
  Speaker 4: or not guilty. He doesn't want John Tester and Montana
• 13:03
  Speaker 4: to stand up and say not guilty. He doesn't want
• 13:06
  Speaker 4: Sheared Brown in Ohio to stand up and say not guilty.
• 13:08
  Speaker 4: He doesn't want Bob Casey in Pennsylvania to stand up
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: and say not guilty. He doesn't want Tammy Baldwin and
• 13:13
  Speaker 4: Wisconsin to stand up and say not guilty. He doesn't
• 13:17
  Speaker 4: want Jackie Rosen and Nevada to stand up and say
• 13:21
  Speaker 4: not guilty. So he's trying to avoid their having to
• 13:25
  Speaker 4: make any adjudication on the merits. But but why is
• 13:27
  Speaker 4: a trial so damaging? Why is the House presenting their
• 13:30
  Speaker 4: evidence so damaging? Understand the Democrats have no response to
• 13:37
  Speaker 4: the arguments about the border and the Judiciary Committee. All
• 13:39
  Speaker 4: the time I lay out the facts, the eight hundred
• 13:42
  Speaker 4: and fifty three migrants who died last year crossing illegally.
• 13:46
  Speaker 4: That's almost three a day that Texas farmers and ranchers
• 13:49
  Speaker 4: are finding on their farms and ranches of dead people,
• 13:52
  Speaker 4: of elderly people, of pregnant women, of little children and
• 13:55
  Speaker 4: toddlers abandoned to die. They can't defend that, can't defend
• 14:01
  Speaker 4: the little boys and little girls that are violently sexually
• 14:05
  Speaker 4: assaulted by human traffickers every day, over and over and
• 14:09
  Speaker 4: over again. They cannot defend the women who are violently
• 14:12
  Speaker 4: raped over and over and over again by human traffickers.
• 14:16
  Speaker 4: They cannot defend the thousands and thousands of teenage girls
• 14:21
  Speaker 4: sold into sex slavery. They cannot defend the over one
• 14:25
  Speaker 4: hundred thousand Americans who died of drug overdoses last year,
• 14:28
  Speaker 4: seventy percent of which was from Chinese fentanyl flooding across
• 14:31
  Speaker 4: our southern border. When I lay out these facts, and
• 14:34
  Speaker 4: I have hundreds of times in the Judiciary Committee, understand, Ben,
• 14:40
  Speaker 4: no Democrat argues with me. It's not like Dick Durbin
• 14:43
  Speaker 4: leans forward and goes, well, you know, Cruz has it wrong,
• 14:46
  Speaker 4: And here's the Democrat spin. Here's why our open borders
• 14:50
  Speaker 4: are a great idea. They don't have a defense, they
• 14:54
  Speaker 4: don't argue, they don't dispute a word I said.
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: Their strategy just when you showed them those bracelets, the
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: bracelets that are used and remind people quickly with the bracelets,
• 15:05
  Speaker 2: but no one refuted it. No one acted like what
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: you were saying was in the gospel truth with the
• 15:10
  Speaker 2: bracelets at the border.
• 15:11
  Speaker 4: Right, look on a lot of issues, all right, taxes,
• 15:15
  Speaker 4: should taxes go up or down? Republicans argue we should
• 15:18
  Speaker 4: cut taxes. That'll produce jobs, it'll help small businesses, it
• 15:21
  Speaker 4: will help working families. We have an argument. The Democrats
• 15:24
  Speaker 4: have an argument on the other side. They said, no, no, no,
• 15:26
  Speaker 4: we want high taxes, high taxes for the rich. By
• 15:28
  Speaker 4: the way, they always say high taxes for the rich,
• 15:30
  Speaker 4: the taxes ended up end up slamming the middle class.
• 15:32
  Speaker 4: But they have an argument, like we go back and forth.
• 15:35
  Speaker 4: They have their left wing talking points. We have what
• 15:38
  Speaker 4: we say, and they go back and forth. What is
• 15:41
  Speaker 4: fascinating and what is incredibly compelling on this issue? There
• 15:49
  Speaker 4: are no Democrat talking points that they don't have an
• 15:53
  Speaker 4: alternative point of view. When I lay out the facts,
• 15:55
  Speaker 4: when others lay out the facts, they sit there silently.
• 15:58
  Speaker 4: And why do they do that? They do that because
• 16:00
  Speaker 4: they know the corporate media is corrupt. They know CNN
• 16:03
  Speaker 4: won't cover what I'm saying. They know ABC won't cover
• 16:05
  Speaker 4: what I'm saying. They won't, No, NBC won't cover what
• 16:07
  Speaker 4: I'm saying. Then no, CBS won't cover what I'm saying.
• 16:09
  Speaker 4: They especially know MSNBC won't cover what I'm saying. In fact,
• 16:13
  Speaker 4: they may do the day in life of a drug
• 16:16
  Speaker 4: lord as bad as MSNBC is, And so their whole
• 16:20
  Speaker 4: strategy is hide the actual facts from the American people.
• 16:26
  Speaker 3: Listen.
• 16:27
  Speaker 4: When I'm in South Texas, do you know that nobody
• 16:30
  Speaker 4: defends this? There are elected Democrats in South Texas. I've
• 16:34
  Speaker 4: never seen an elected Democrat in South Texas say hey,
• 16:36
  Speaker 4: what Joe Biden's doing at the border is awesome. It's
• 16:38
  Speaker 4: just great. It's something. So when Chuck Schumer says policy disputes, Okay,
• 16:43
  Speaker 4: what's your policy? Defend it? They don't want to. Their
• 16:47
  Speaker 4: whole strategy is hide, hide, hide, count on the media
• 16:51
  Speaker 4: to hide, because they're hoping the American people don't realize
• 16:55
  Speaker 4: what they're doing. That's why Schumer wants to dismiss it.
• 16:59
  Speaker 4: A trial terrifies him.
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: I want to talk to you real quick about your retirement.
• 17:05
  Speaker 2: You've seen what's been going on with the economy. You've
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: seen what's been happening with inflation, and the big question
• 17:10
  Speaker 2: is are you diversified? With inflation still well above the
• 17:13
  Speaker 2: Fed's target rate and consumer prices much higher than they
• 17:17
  Speaker 2: were two years ago, three years ago, and four years ago,
• 17:21
  Speaker 2: you need a financial plan that ensures your money you
• 17:23
  Speaker 2: save today will actually be enough for you tomorrow. That
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: is where gold and silver comes in, and I want
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: you to know about freedom.
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: Gold USA. And here's the number one reason.
• 17:34
  Speaker 2: Not only do they preach protection and diversifying your assets.
• 17:39
  Speaker 2: Let me be clear, they don't say put all your
• 17:41
  Speaker 2: money in gold and silver, but they also do this.
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: On average, they charge twenty five to thirty percent less
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: than most major gold and silver firms that you hear
• 17:53
  Speaker 2: from every single day on radio and TV. So, if
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: you want to make sure that you're getting a great
• 17:59
  Speaker 2: deal when you invest in gold and silver, and you
• 18:02
  Speaker 2: want a company that believes that you should be diversified,
• 18:05
  Speaker 2: not just saying, hey, put it all in gold and silver,
• 18:08
  Speaker 2: call my friends at Freedom Goold USA. They are all
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: about educating their clients on how to invest in precious metals.
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: So take control of your financial future. Now, we just
• 18:19
  Speaker 2: saw gold in the last couple weeks at an all
• 18:21
  Speaker 2: time high. Yet again, why is that happening? Because people
• 18:24
  Speaker 2: are wanting to protect their assets in today's economy. Visit
• 18:28
  Speaker 2: FREEDOMGOLDUSA dot com slash verdict. That's Freedom Goold USA dot
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: com slash verdict, or you can call them one eight
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: hundred sixty five five eight eight four three. That's one
• 18:44
  Speaker 2: eight hundred sixty fifty five eight eight four three. When
• 18:49
  Speaker 2: you call makes you tell them I sent you, and
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: you can even talk to them about getting free silver
• 18:53
  Speaker 2: in your account today. That's one eight hundred and sixty
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: five eight eight four to three or online at freedom
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: gold Usa dot com slash Verdict Center. Let's talk about
• 19:04
  Speaker 2: the confidence of Chuck Schumer. In that clip that we played,
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: he seemed pretty confident and set it over again. I
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: think twice that this is going to be something we're
• 19:15
  Speaker 2: looking for a resolution.
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: Quickly, maybe in a day.
• 19:18
  Speaker 2: As the reporter yell back at him, he didn't seem
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: to push back on that at all. So what is
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: their game plan to basically make all this go away?
• 19:27
  Speaker 2: And how do we stop it? And that seems to
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: be your core goal here is to make sure that
• 19:32
  Speaker 2: doesn't happen.
• 19:33
  Speaker 4: Schumer wants it incredibly quick, incredibly silent. He doesn't want
• 19:37
  Speaker 4: Senate Democrats on record, He doesn't want any of the
• 19:40
  Speaker 4: facts revealed to the American people. So originally the plan
• 19:43
  Speaker 4: was that the House had announced they were going to
• 19:45
  Speaker 4: transmit the articles of impeachment Wednesday night. You and I
• 19:49
  Speaker 4: are recording this right now. It is eleven fifty one
• 19:52
  Speaker 4: pm Tuesday night. The plan from the House was it
• 19:55
  Speaker 4: was going to come over Wednesday night. Now, the consequence
• 19:59
  Speaker 4: of that means that the Senate would have convened as
• 20:04
  Speaker 4: an impeachment trial Thursday at one pm. So when articles
• 20:08
  Speaker 4: of impeachment come to the Senate, there's actually a separate
• 20:11
  Speaker 4: set of rules for impeachment. They're totally different from the
• 20:14
  Speaker 4: legislative rules, and it's mandatory that the Senate immediately moves
• 20:18
  Speaker 4: into impeachment when articles of impeachment come over. Look, it's
• 20:20
  Speaker 4: only come over twenty one times in our whole nation's history.
• 20:23
  Speaker 4: It is an unusual moment. The problem with the Senate
• 20:29
  Speaker 4: starting this Thursday at one pm is typically senators go
• 20:34
  Speaker 4: home Thursday afternoon, get on a plane, and fly back.
• 20:36
  Speaker 3: To their states.
• 20:38
  Speaker 4: Schumer wanted to do all of this Thursday afternoon because
• 20:40
  Speaker 4: he knew senators would be anxious to leave to get
• 20:42
  Speaker 4: back to their states. They have events scheduled in their state,
• 20:45
  Speaker 4: they're traveling around their state, and he knew they would
• 20:47
  Speaker 4: want to get out of here. So this morning, Tuesday morning,
• 20:51
  Speaker 4: I started the morning by sitting down in a meeting
• 20:54
  Speaker 4: with Mitch McConnell and with Republican leadership and with Mike
• 20:58
  Speaker 4: Lee and John Kennedy and meeting with leadership about how
• 21:04
  Speaker 4: we can fight what Schumer is doing here. And a
• 21:07
  Speaker 4: point that I raised in that meeting this morning, I said,
• 21:10
  Speaker 4: it is really damn stupid for us to do this
• 21:15
  Speaker 4: Thursday afternoon. It facilitates Schumer's goal of making this quick.
• 21:20
  Speaker 4: And what I suggested at the meeting this morning is
• 21:23
  Speaker 4: I said it would make a lot more sense for
• 21:25
  Speaker 4: the House to transmit the articles of impeachment next week,
• 21:28
  Speaker 4: next Monday. If they transmit it Monday, the Senate takes
• 21:32
  Speaker 4: it up Tuesday. Tuesday is a much better time to
• 21:35
  Speaker 4: take it up because it means the Senate we have
• 21:37
  Speaker 4: the entire week to put this issue before the American people,
• 21:40
  Speaker 4: and we're not doing it at a time when senators,
• 21:42
  Speaker 4: both Democrats and Republicans are eager to get out of town.
• 21:46
  Speaker 4: The phrase is jet fumes are in the air like
• 21:48
  Speaker 4: Thursday afternoon is when leadership tries to ram things through
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: quickly because everyone wants to leave.
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: Well, and by the way side, note what's happening author
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: this weekend, which every person in America that will have
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: supports it's going to be paying attention to as well.
• 22:01
  Speaker 2: That starts on Thursday the master. So for Democrat to
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: be even a better time to get on Thursday.
• 22:07
  Speaker 4: So a bit of good news I raised this morning
• 22:11
  Speaker 4: at the meeting. I said, this doesn't make any sense.
• 22:13
  Speaker 4: Everyone who was meeting with us agreed, and so I
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: texted the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson. Mike Lee
• 22:20
  Speaker 4: texted the Speaker of the House. John Kennedy texted the
• 22:23
  Speaker 4: Speaker of the House, and the Speaker, to his credit,
• 22:26
  Speaker 4: he's a great guy, he's a great friend. The Speaker said, okay, great,
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: happy to do it. And so he announced this afternoon
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: that they were going to delay sending the articles of
• 22:35
  Speaker 4: impeachment until early next week, and so we asked him
• 22:38
  Speaker 4: to do that.
• 22:38
  Speaker 3: He did that at our request.
• 22:40
  Speaker 4: And the reason we wanted it to come early next
• 22:43
  Speaker 4: week is so that we could focus early on the
• 22:45
  Speaker 4: week when we could get real attention and focus on it.
• 22:47
  Speaker 4: So that was a good step. Now I want to
• 22:51
  Speaker 4: pause and have you reflect a little bit on why
• 22:55
  Speaker 4: this motion to table is so consequential if Schumer succeeds,
• 22:59
  Speaker 4: if if every Democrat votes for it, and right now
• 23:02
  Speaker 4: Schumer seems supremely confident that every Democrat will vote for it.
• 23:08
  Speaker 4: What that means, number one, is that every Democrat is
• 23:10
  Speaker 4: now on record supporting Joe Biden's open borders, that they're
• 23:15
  Speaker 4: perfectly fine with what Alejandro Mayorcis has done, but Number
• 23:19
  Speaker 4: two understand that they will have participated in changing the
• 23:25
  Speaker 4: US Senate. And so today I participated in a press
• 23:29
  Speaker 4: conference with a number of Republican senators where we talked
• 23:31
  Speaker 4: about the significance of this moment. And it is in
• 23:36
  Speaker 4: many ways very similar to twenty thirteen and twenty thirteen
• 23:39
  Speaker 4: Harry Reid, the Democrat, was the Senate majority leader, and
• 23:43
  Speaker 4: it is when Harry Reid nuked the filibuster for judicial
• 23:48
  Speaker 4: appointments and for cabinet appointments and nuking the filibuster, what
• 23:52
  Speaker 4: that meant is is that Harry Reid broke the Senate
• 23:55
  Speaker 4: rules in order to change the Senate rules. It used
• 23:57
  Speaker 4: to be the case that you needed sixty votes to
• 23:59
  Speaker 4: move forward on judges, to move forward on executive branch nominees.
• 24:04
  Speaker 4: And what Harry Reid did is he used what was
• 24:10
  Speaker 4: called the nuclear option, which is that he got a
• 24:14
  Speaker 4: ruling from the chair on the floor that it takes
• 24:17
  Speaker 4: sixty votes to proceed to a nomination, and then he
• 24:21
  Speaker 4: moved to overturn the ruling of the Chair. Under the
• 24:23
  Speaker 4: Senate rules, any ruling of the Chair can be overturned,
• 24:26
  Speaker 4: and you can overturn the ruling of the Chair with
• 24:29
  Speaker 4: just fifty one votes. And so what happened was Harry
• 24:32
  Speaker 4: Reid got the Democrats to overturn the ruling of the Chair.
• 24:35
  Speaker 4: And once you do that, you change the precedence, and
• 24:38
  Speaker 4: that new ruling is binding. The effect of that is,
• 24:42
  Speaker 4: since twenty thirteen, nominations have only required fifty one votes
• 24:46
  Speaker 4: instead of sixty votes. Well, that night that Reid was
• 24:52
  Speaker 4: nuking the filibuster for nominations. The filibuster still exists for legislation,
• 24:57
  Speaker 4: but read nuked it for nominations. I talked to Amy
• 25:02
  Speaker 4: Klobuchar on the Senate floor and I told Amy that day,
• 25:05
  Speaker 4: I said, you are going to regret this decision. All
• 25:09
  Speaker 4: of the Democrats are going to regret this decision. And
• 25:12
  Speaker 4: the consequence of this decision is we're going to see
• 25:16
  Speaker 4: more justices like Antoninscalienne, Clarence Thomas on the courts. And
• 25:20
  Speaker 4: there is an irony that the direct result of Harry
• 25:25
  Speaker 4: Reid nuking the filibuster is Roe versus Wade being overturned.
• 25:29
  Speaker 4: If Harry Reid had not nuked the filibuster, there's no
• 25:32
  Speaker 4: way on earth that the Senate would have confirmed Brett Kavanaugh,
• 25:36
  Speaker 4: or probably not Amy Coney Barrett, and maybe not even
• 25:38
  Speaker 4: Neil Gorsuch. That if we required sixty votes, Roe versus
• 25:44
  Speaker 4: Wade would still be the law of the land. But
• 25:47
  Speaker 4: for the Senate Democrats nuking the filibuster in twenty thirteen,
• 25:50
  Speaker 4: and I told them that, a number of us told
• 25:52
  Speaker 4: them that in twenty thirteen. Now, what Chuck Schumer is
• 25:57
  Speaker 4: planning to do next week is every bit as big
• 26:01
  Speaker 4: a deal as nuking the filibuster. And in many ways
• 26:03
  Speaker 4: it's more significant. Why because the filibuster is not.
• 26:07
  Speaker 1: Actual what is the cause and effect?
• 26:09
  Speaker 2: Then? Right, if you're saying you give the last example,
• 26:12
  Speaker 2: which is significant, and I don't think you know many
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: people understood that are remembered it. But what would it
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: then be the cause and effect of this? And could
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: there be a silver lining in it? Well, Look, the
• 26:25
  Speaker 2: reason it is more significant is the filibuster is not
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: written in the Constitution. The filibuster is a matter of
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: Senate procedure and Senate practice, and the Senate rules impeachment
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: is written into the Constitution. The obligation on the Senate
• 26:39
  Speaker 2: to try impeachment is mandatory. It is in the Constitution.
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: So what the Senate Democrats are planning to do next
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: week is nuke the impeachment clause of the Constitution, destroy
• 26:51
  Speaker 2: the Senate's responsibility, give away the Senate's power. And you
• 26:54
  Speaker 2: want to know the consequences. Listen, We've got an election
• 26:58
  Speaker 2: in November. I think there's a very good chance to
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: Donald Trump will be elected president. And it is entirely
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: possible that Trump will be elected president. Republicans will take
• 27:07
  Speaker 2: the Senate, and yet we could lose the House. We
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: could end up in January with Trump and the White House,
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: a Republican Senate and a Democrat House. If that happens,
• 27:19
  Speaker 2: I'm here to predict right now. If the Democrats have
• 27:21
  Speaker 2: the House, they will once again impeach Donald Trump, maybe
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: for the third time, the fourth time, the fifth time.
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: I can't tell you how many times a Democrat house
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: will impeach Donald Trump. It may be the only thing
• 27:31
  Speaker 2: they do for two years.
• 27:33
  Speaker 4: If that happens and it comes to the Senate and
• 27:37
  Speaker 4: we have a Republican Senate, you know what we'll do.
• 27:39
  Speaker 4: We'll table the damn thing. And let's be clear, we
• 27:42
  Speaker 4: didn't last time. So when Donald Trump was impeached the
• 27:46
  Speaker 4: first time, it was exactly that scenario. You had a
• 27:49
  Speaker 4: Democrat House Pelosi ram the impeachment through the impeachment came
• 27:54
  Speaker 4: over to the Senate. We had a Republican Senate, Mitch
• 27:56
  Speaker 4: McConnell was the majority leader. We could have tried to
• 28:00
  Speaker 4: do what Chuck Schumer is getting ready to do. We
• 28:02
  Speaker 4: could have just tried to table at the outset, but
• 28:04
  Speaker 4: we didn't because Senate Republicans actually took our constitutional obligation seriously.
• 28:09
  Speaker 4: We followed the Constitution. We conducted the trial, and Donald
• 28:12
  Speaker 4: Trump was acquitted. We voted not guilty. That's actually the
• 28:15
  Speaker 4: proper constitutional way. What Chuck Schumer is willing to do
• 28:20
  Speaker 4: to protect Democrat senators from accountability for the disaster at
• 28:25
  Speaker 4: our southern border of their policies, what he now calls
• 28:28
  Speaker 4: a policy dispute, is break the Senate and nuke the
• 28:33
  Speaker 4: impeachment clause of the Constitution. That's a big deal, and
• 28:37
  Speaker 4: it's a deal that will have consequences ten years, fifty years,
• 28:42
  Speaker 4: one hundred years from now. If Schumer does this next week,
• 28:46
  Speaker 4: you will never again see an impeachment trial when the
• 28:49
  Speaker 4: Senate is the same party as the president, that will
• 28:52
  Speaker 4: be taken off the table.
• 28:54
  Speaker 2: So if he does this, will there be any backlash
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: you think come November? Or is this such inside baseball
• 29:02
  Speaker 2: that it just says they say, okay, so what he
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: changed it?
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: Who really cares?
• 29:08
  Speaker 4: Well, Look the institutional change of the Senate, I don't
• 29:12
  Speaker 4: think that's going to be a big voting issue. I
• 29:15
  Speaker 4: do think the border and the chaos and the suffering
• 29:20
  Speaker 4: and the death that is coming from Joe Biden to
• 29:22
  Speaker 4: the Democrats' open border, I think that is going to
• 29:24
  Speaker 4: be probably the single most important issue in November, and
• 29:29
  Speaker 4: so it is critically important we do everything we can
• 29:32
  Speaker 4: to number one, increase the price for Schumer breaking the Senate,
• 29:37
  Speaker 4: destroying the institutions of democracy. You know, there's an irony.
• 29:42
  Speaker 4: Democrats love to beat their chest and talk about how
• 29:44
  Speaker 4: they want to save democracy, and yet this is an
• 29:49
  Speaker 4: assault on democracy. This is an assault on the constitution
• 29:53
  Speaker 4: and the institution that is the Senate, just like the
• 29:56
  Speaker 4: Democrats assault on the filibuster back in twenty thirteen. The
• 29:59
  Speaker 4: Democrats have systematically been tearing down our institutions. But what
• 30:04
  Speaker 4: I think is going to resonate. So listen, when we
• 30:07
  Speaker 4: move to the impeachment trial, hopefully early next week, a
• 30:11
  Speaker 4: number of US intend to raise points of order. I
• 30:13
  Speaker 4: intend to raise probably multiple points of order, challenging what
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: the Democrats are doing. And let me be clear what's
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: supposed to happen. So here's what should happen next week.
• 30:24
  Speaker 4: They're one of two things that can happen. Number One,
• 30:28
  Speaker 4: the Senate, the full Senate could move could could move
• 30:32
  Speaker 4: to could adopt an organizing resolution and move to holding
• 30:36
  Speaker 4: an impeachment trial on the floor of the Senate. Now,
• 30:39
  Speaker 4: when the president is impeached, the Chief Justice of the
• 30:42
  Speaker 4: United States presides over the impeachment trial and it occurs
• 30:48
  Speaker 4: on the floor of the Senate. You'll recall that's what
• 30:50
  Speaker 4: happened with both the Trump's impeachments. That's what happened with
• 30:53
  Speaker 4: Bill Clinton's impeachment. And so Mike Lee has filed an
• 31:00
  Speaker 4: organizing resolution that I've co authored that would set up
• 31:04
  Speaker 4: a trial using exactly the same rules that the Democrats
• 31:07
  Speaker 4: put in place that we followed for Donald Trump's impeachment. Actually,
• 31:11
  Speaker 4: the first one the Republicans put in place, the second
• 31:14
  Speaker 4: one the Democrats had a majority they put in place
• 31:16
  Speaker 4: for Trump's second impeachment. And by the way, the second
• 31:20
  Speaker 4: impeachment of Trump, the Chief Justice did not preside because
• 31:23
  Speaker 4: Trump was no longer president. So Pat Leahy, the President
• 31:26
  Speaker 4: pro tem, presided, because the Chief Justice only presides when
• 31:29
  Speaker 4: it is the sitting president who's being impeached. That's one
• 31:33
  Speaker 4: way of proceeding. Frankly, if we had a Republican majority,
• 31:36
  Speaker 4: that's the way we would proceed is we would have
• 31:38
  Speaker 4: a trial on the floor of the Senate to put
• 31:40
  Speaker 4: the facts before the American people. There is another way
• 31:44
  Speaker 4: that Schumer and the Democrats could proceed, consistent with the
• 31:47
  Speaker 4: Constitution and consistent with the law, which is the Senate
• 31:50
  Speaker 4: could appoint an impeachment committee, a committee with an equal
• 31:55
  Speaker 4: number of members, an equal number of Democrats and Republicans,
• 31:59
  Speaker 4: and the committee would conduct the impeachment trial. Now, the
• 32:02
  Speaker 4: trial would be public. The House managers would present their evidence,
• 32:06
  Speaker 4: and the committee would conduct the trial. That is the
• 32:08
  Speaker 4: way that the Senate is handled, for example, the judicial
• 32:11
  Speaker 4: impeachments that come over. They've appointed a committee, the committee
• 32:15
  Speaker 4: has heard the trial, and then the committee makes a
• 32:17
  Speaker 4: recommendation to the Senate, and the Senate Ultimately, every Senator
• 32:20
  Speaker 4: has to vote guilty or not guilty. But the trial
• 32:23
  Speaker 4: itself is not held on the Senate floor. It's held
• 32:26
  Speaker 4: in a committee. Now, I filed an organizing resolution that
• 32:31
  Speaker 4: would set up exactly that process, would set up a
• 32:33
  Speaker 4: committee to conduct the trial. The trial would be public,
• 32:37
  Speaker 4: so we would put the information, we'd put the charges,
• 32:39
  Speaker 4: we'd put the evidence, we'd put the harms, we'd put
• 32:42
  Speaker 4: the people hurt and killed by the Democrats' open borders.
• 32:45
  Speaker 4: We put all of those facts before the American people.
• 32:48
  Speaker 4: But it would not be on the floor. It would
• 32:49
  Speaker 4: be in a committee. I'm going to make a motion
• 32:55
  Speaker 4: to do that. The Democrats are going to oppose it,
• 32:57
  Speaker 4: I expect, and I think there are a number of
• 32:59
  Speaker 4: Republicans who are going to raise points of orders, try
• 33:01
  Speaker 4: to make motions to highlight the enormous harms caused by
• 33:06
  Speaker 4: the open borders. And what I'm anticipating is every Democrat
• 33:09
  Speaker 4: voting party line over and over and over again against
• 33:13
  Speaker 4: every motion and every point of order we raise. Why
• 33:16
  Speaker 4: And it's what Chuck Schumer told us, Because this is
• 33:18
  Speaker 4: a policy dispute, and the policy of the Democrats is
• 33:21
  Speaker 4: they are for open borders. No matter how many people
• 33:24
  Speaker 4: are killed, no matter how many children are violated, no
• 33:28
  Speaker 4: matter how many women are sexually assaulted, they'refore open borders,
• 33:32
  Speaker 4: no matter how many terrorists come into this country and
• 33:35
  Speaker 4: how much death and destruction results. And I think next
• 33:38
  Speaker 4: week we're going to see that vividly before the American people.
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: I want to tell you about our friends over at
• 33:44
  Speaker 2: AMMO squared. If you're like me and you want to
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: make sure that you're stocked up on AMO at all times,
• 33:50
  Speaker 2: and you don't want to be caught by surprise when
• 33:52
  Speaker 2: there's the next run on Ammo and then all of
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: a sudden you can't find basic AMOT stores. That's what
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: happened for well over a year during COVID. Well, if
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: you were with AMO.
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: Squared, you didn't have to worry about any of that.
• 34:03
  Speaker 2: Why Because with Amo Squared, Ammo is delivered on demand
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: or automatically when you need it, and stored for free
• 34:10
  Speaker 2: when you don't. They were founded more than eight years
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: ago in the freedom weving state of Idaho, and AMMO
• 34:15
  Speaker 2: Square is truly automated, set it and forget it. Ammo purchasing,
• 34:21
  Speaker 2: you can forget about dealing with moving heavy case of
• 34:23
  Speaker 2: ammunition as well.
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: You can literally exchange.
• 34:26
  Speaker 2: Your ammo squared inventory from one caliber to another in
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: seconds with just a few clicks. Or you can close
• 34:34
  Speaker 2: your account and sell it all back anytime that you
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: need the money or if the price goes up. Yes,
• 34:40
  Speaker 2: it is effortless ammunition management. Over sixty different caliber options
• 34:45
  Speaker 2: are available. AMO squared is here to help you smooth
• 34:49
  Speaker 2: out through the rough spots.
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: Of ammunition availability.
• 34:52
  Speaker 2: Like an AMMO flour one K or AMMO Savings account,
• 34:56
  Speaker 2: you save up AMMO for that rainy day when store
• 35:00
  Speaker 2: shelves go empty and demand skyrockets and AMMO is scarce.
• 35:04
  Speaker 2: You're covered because you've been buying month after month. The
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: best of all AMO squared only ships factory new ammunition
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: from well known brands. They don't manufacture AMMO or ship reloads.
• 35:16
  Speaker 2: So if you want AMMO at a great price and
• 35:19
  Speaker 2: you want to have it on demand, go to amosquare
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: dot com slash verdict. That's ammosquared dot com slash vernict
• 35:27
  Speaker 2: to sign up and get free AMMO in your account
• 35:31
  Speaker 2: right now. Amosquare dot com slash verdict. Sign up and
• 35:35
  Speaker 2: get free AMO right now. Senator one last question, I
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: want to ask you about this issue and it's an
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: important one and that is okay. So in the next
• 35:44
  Speaker 2: four or five days, what a listeners of verdict need
• 35:47
  Speaker 2: to do and who do they need to be calling
• 35:49
  Speaker 2: or does this say hey, go and call into local
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: talk radio shows and explain why this is important and
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: what Republicans should do.
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: Do they need to call their senators?
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: Sometimes people, I think get fatigue on that and they think,
• 36:02
  Speaker 2: do they even listen to me? Does it even matter
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: if I've got a Democratic senator that I from my state,
• 36:07
  Speaker 2: Are they going to even listen to me?
• 36:10
  Speaker 1: So?
• 36:10
  Speaker 4: Yes, call your senators and it's important, particularly those Democrat
• 36:13
  Speaker 4: senators that are in tough reelection races. I mentioned them Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Wisconsin,
• 36:23
  Speaker 4: all of them are in tough reelection races.
• 36:25
  Speaker 3: Call them.
• 36:27
  Speaker 4: Call if you're in New Hampshire, You've got two Democrats there.
• 36:30
  Speaker 4: They're not in the ballot this time, but call them anyway.
• 36:32
  Speaker 4: If you've got call your senator and say follow the constitution,
• 36:37
  Speaker 4: have a trial. Call your senator and say in the
• 36:39
  Speaker 4: open borders that pressure matters. That pressure there's a reason
• 36:44
  Speaker 4: Schumer listen. Schumer is not shy about talking. I mean
• 36:49
  Speaker 4: he'll talk about anything. The fact that he had two
• 36:51
  Speaker 4: sentences he read and nothing more. We're going to finish
• 36:54
  Speaker 4: this very quickly. Impeachment shouldn't be used for policy disputes.
• 36:57
  Speaker 4: He didn't have a third sentence. The reason is he's
• 37:00
  Speaker 4: terrified his members, John Tester and Montana is utterly terrified.
• 37:05
  Speaker 4: He wants this over yesterday, fast, fast, fast, fast, fast,
• 37:08
  Speaker 4: because the people of Montana are horrified by the open
• 37:11
  Speaker 4: borders that John Tester supports, and he's going to pretend
• 37:14
  Speaker 4: when he goes home he doesn't support them. Well, every
• 37:17
  Speaker 4: moment that this is on the Senate floor, every moment
• 37:20
  Speaker 4: that the American people are seeing this is a bad
• 37:22
  Speaker 4: moment for Senate Democrats that are trying to get reelected.
• 37:25
  Speaker 4: So yes, call your senator, but also do everything you
• 37:29
  Speaker 4: can to highlight what's going on, to highlight the facts. Look,
• 37:32
  Speaker 4: the Democrats' strategy is darkness. It's cover this up. It's
• 37:36
  Speaker 4: count on the corporate media not to tell the American people.
• 37:39
  Speaker 4: Hope the voters do not know what is happening. So
• 37:42
  Speaker 4: do everything we can. Hopefully next week I'm certainly going
• 37:45
  Speaker 4: to be trying a number of the other Republicans are
• 37:47
  Speaker 4: going to be trying to highlight the absolute disaster, the
• 37:52
  Speaker 4: indefensible crisis that the Democrats have deliberately caused on the
• 37:57
  Speaker 4: southern border and that they continue to cause. It's not
• 38:00
  Speaker 4: like they've stopped. They're doing it today, they're doing it tomorrow.
• 38:03
  Speaker 4: They're going to continue to do it over and over
• 38:06
  Speaker 4: and over again because for them, the partisan political upside
• 38:09
  Speaker 4: is worth it, and the people who suffer and die
• 38:13
  Speaker 4: that's not a big enough problem to make them stop
• 38:16
  Speaker 4: or change their behavior. We need to make sure the
• 38:18
  Speaker 4: American people know the facts.
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah, great point. Don't forget.
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: Share this podcast with your family and friends, share it
• 38:26
  Speaker 2: on social media.
• 38:27
  Speaker 1: Right, it's a five star review.
• 38:28
  Speaker 2: It helps us reach a new audience and most importantly,
• 38:32
  Speaker 2: get involved. Call your senators and make sure people know
• 38:36
  Speaker 2: what's going on in your states, especially the ones that
• 38:38
  Speaker 2: the senator just talked about.
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: Also, don't forget.
• 38:40
  Speaker 2: You can grab my podcast and I'll keep you up
• 38:43
  Speaker 2: to date on the in between days as we do
• 38:44
  Speaker 2: the show Monday, Wednesday and Fridays. Grab my show the
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: Ben Ferguson podcasts as well, and I'll keep you up
• 38:49
  Speaker 2: to dated on the breaking news on those in between
• 38:51
  Speaker 2: days and the Senator and I will see you back
• 38:53
  Speaker 2: here Friday morning.