Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / BIDEN, THE IRS, AND THE SCHOOLBOARDS COME AFTER PARENTS WHO SPEAK UP! I'LL EXPLAIN HOW TO STAND UP AND WIN AGAINST THEM!

Transcript

BIDEN, THE IRS, AND THE SCHOOLBOARDS COME AFTER PARENTS WHO SPEAK UP! I'LL EXPLAIN HOW TO STAND UP AND WIN AGAINST THEM! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Today's show, we are going to deal with a couple
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: of different things that deal with the budget, that deal
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: with the IRS spying on you, and deal with the
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: quality of life in this country. And we are also
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: going to talk about just how bad things are going
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: to get with our economy if Democrats are allowed to
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: pass this multi trillion dollar spending bill that they're working
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: on right now. US Center Bill Haggerty, who's been fighting this,
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: is going to join us in a few minutes. That
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: Center Bill Haggerty has said that this three point five
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: trillion dollar reconciliation bill, it also includes carve outs for
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: big tech corporations who want an unlimited use of foreign workers.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: So much for putting Americans first under the Biden administration. Right, no, no, no,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: we're a global economy. Now, we don't care about American systems.
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: We care about importing new citizens that will vote for US. Yeah,
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: this three point five trillion dollar bill being pushed by
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: Democrats includes a quote carve outvie unlimited use of foreign workers,
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: specifically for big tech companies. This is typical of these giants.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: Massive DC lobbyists come in and this is what they do.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: This is the bill that we've dug through over two thousand,
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: five hundred pages to be clear, and it's buried and
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: hidden inside the bill is this carve out for corporations.
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: It allows unlimited green cards for ten years. Let me
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: say it again, it allows unlimited green cards for big
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: tech for ten years. Corporations and can then bring in
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: foreign workers that can come to American soil where those
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: jobs will be held for up to a decade by
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: Green card holders, and it does not provide for Americans
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: to actually be in the job market in these industries.
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: Here's the other part. What a green card does is
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: it provides permanent resident status for the foreigners coming in.
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: These foreign workers typically work for less than American citizens
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: in terms of the same jobs. Quote. I want Americans
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: to be able to hold these jobs, and I want
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: them to be able to step up the career ladder
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: to improve their own lives, and not to have the
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: permanent pressure of foreign workers coming in who will work
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: more cheaply. That's not what we have in this country
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: throughout history. That's not what we need in this country.
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: That's not what it needs to happen in America. Yet
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: this is exactly what the Democrats have in their bill.
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: Because if you can give unlimited use of foreign workers
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: to these carve out corporations, and you can give them
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: green cards and they can say forever, and they can
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: undermine the American worker. This is amazing for the future
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: of the country under socialism. It's not what's best for
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: this country under freedom, under democracy. That's exactly why the
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: Democrats are doing it. Now. We're going to have an
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: exclusive conversation with Sender Haggarty coming up in a moment
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: on this, but to get to another issue real quick,
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: and that is what we're now finding out about the
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: Biden administrations IRS plan for your bank accounts. This is
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: extremely important what I'm about to tell you. There are
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: things that changed over the last couple of hours that
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: you need to know about. Things have changed for the
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: IRS to spy on you twenty four seven, three hundred
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: and sixty five days a year. The media is not
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: reporting on this. I need you to make sure that
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: you share this information and also share our podcasts with
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: all this info in it to everybody you know. So
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: if you're listening to this, make sure you share our
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: podcast that will have everything in there that you can
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: just say hey to your family and friends. Listen to this.
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: This new IRS plan would basically put each and every
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: American under an IRS audit indefinitely. You would also affect
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: working class Americans, and you would be three times more
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: likely to be audited than the rich elite, which they
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: claim this bill is actually all about, and it's not
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: about the rich elite. Now President Joe Biden and the
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: Biden administration now want the IRS to monitor the bank
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: accounts of every American system. You may have heard about this.
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: The word was it was balances over six hundred dollars
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: a month, transactions over six hundred dollars a month. That's
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: originally what we were being too old. Six hundred dollars
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: a month, and a bank account is easy to get
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: to every month. If you have a cell phone bill,
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: if you have rent, if you have a utility bill. Right,
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: six hundred dollars coming out of a bank account is
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: super easy to get to every month. We now been
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: told that is now changing from monthly to annually. That
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: means if you have a bank account that has transactions
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: to go up and down a fifty dollars a month,
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: you would hit the six hundred dollars annual number that
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: the IRS would need to then spy on you. According
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: to The Hill newspaper, the administration wants banking institutions to
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: not monthly, but to annually report to the IRS the
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: total deposits and withdrawals from accounts that have a balance
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: over six hundred dollars or bring in over six hundred
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: dollars annually. So if you had fifty dollars a month,
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: twelve months a year come in and out of your
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: bank account, you would hit the six hundred dollars annual amount,
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: which means anybody basically that has a bank account is
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: going to have IRS auditing them twenty four to seven.
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: Now they're claiming this is to catch the rich tax cheats.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: That's how they're selling this. There is nobody that is
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: rich that's fifty dollars a month going in out of
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: bank account. Okay, this is about the poor, the middle class.
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: This is about socialism and communism and total tyranny of
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: a government that is spying on your every transaction. Okay,
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: Bill Gates has more, Jeff Bezo has more money than
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: fifty dollars a month going in out of the bank account.
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: Children have more than fifty dollars a month going in
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: out of their bank accounts. Usually this is not about
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: going after the rich. It's going about this is going
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: about going after you. Now they are claiming we're just
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: trying to find people. They're using loopholes and accounting tricks
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: and not, you know, reporting all of their income. That's
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: a lie. Who's going to get nailed the most by
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: this Those making less than twenty five thousand for a year,
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: We'll fall into this. Unbrell listens. They tend to have
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: irregular income, according to a new report. The proposal for
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: the six hundred dollar payment, according to the the Treasury Department,
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: would let the IRS look at the inflow and the
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: outflow of your bank account and compare it to your
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: reported income. They say it would be to target millionaires.
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: You should not believe them. One analysts said, you know
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: who also happens to have income that isn't reported, often
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: doesn't match what is in their bank account. People who
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: are poor and work in the service industry and they're
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: not w two workers, people like handymen, bartenders, servers, some
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: of the most vulnerable people in our economy, especially under COVID.
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: Right now, the IRS is pushing this law because it
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: allows them to have more power than any other government
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: agency to do surveillance on your life. It is, by
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: the way, three times, yes, three times more likely that
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: to audit the IRS a person making less than twenty
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: five thousand a year than to audit the income flows
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: of the richest one percent of Americans. That's a fact.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: So what's behind this push for the IRS driven snooping?
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: The Biden administration says it will just help uncover a quote,
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: four hundred and sixty three billion dollars tax moneies over
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: the next decade that should have been collected. How they
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: can have that number, No one knows, didn't matter. Just
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: throw a number out there, right, and it sounds good.
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: Let's do it now, of course, in the air of
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: social media privacy concerns and propose vaccine passports, why not
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: throwing there the time a bank reporting. It's just one
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: more step towards what many have referred to now as
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: social credit scores and the government telling you where you
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: can and cannot spend your money. Let's talk about monitoring
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: your transactions for a second, So the RS would have
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: access to your bank account if you do more than
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: fifty hours a month and transactions. What if you give
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: a donation to a certain candidate. Does that get you audited?
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: What if you give money to your church, does that
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: give you audited? What if you give it an organization
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: like the NRA, does that get you audited? Now? Of course,
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: the Obama team that has been put together years ago
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: that Biden is now using yet again, they say, oh no, no,
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: that won't happen. Now, that's the same team that allowed
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: the IRS to actually go after conservative tea party groups
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: several years ago. You may remember that story, right when
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: under the Obama administration you had the IRS actually targeting
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: party groups to try to attack them, shut them down,
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: put some of them in jail. We know that for
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: a fact. It all came out, We all saw it.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: No one was held accountable for it, but it happened. Now,
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: of course they would tell you that that would never happen, right,
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: same thing was spying on your bank acount. Oh, we
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: would never monitor your transactions or who you donated to,
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: which church you gave to, or if you gave money
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: to a place like the you know the opposite of
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: planned parenthood, like national Right to Life groups. We would
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: never never look at your money and then maybe audit
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: you because we see you're a conservative. Never, it wouldn't happen, right, sure, okay.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: Quote the proposal involves no reporting, the Biden administration says,
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: of individual transactions of any individual. That's the Transury Secretary
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: Janet Yellen assured an interview with CBS News to no pushback. Quote.
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: If somebody reports an income of ten thousand and they
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: had three million go out of there checking account, that
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: tells the I R s an individual you should probably audit.
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: They say, that's why we're doing this. Come on, really,
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: so to believe this crap? And if this is true
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: what they're saying, then why not put it a million
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: dollars of transactions in the year two million or three
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: million or four million out of a bank account. That
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: would then red flag the IRS to audit you. Why
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: are you going down to fifty dollars a month? I mean,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: are their children whose parents are trying to teach them
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: finances that have more than fifty dollurs go in and
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: out of a bank account a month? Why do you
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: put it so low? If you're trying to catch the
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: billionaire and millionaire tax cheats, they're not actually trying to
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: catch them. Folks understand that they're not trying to actually
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: catch them. They're trying to monitor everything you do, where
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: you eat, if you have a vaccine passport, and where
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: your money goes in your bank account. Quote identifying individual
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: transactions are not presumably an IRS audit on twenty five
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars per your single mother working as a waitress
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: will present an massive burden on that mother. That's exactly
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: with us about banks, by the way, are going ballistic
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: over the burden of that's reporting because it makes up
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: it's a nightmare scenario for them. But they don't care.
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: Right this is Congress Speaker Nanci Pelosi is just blown
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: that office being an anecdotal whatever point. She told reporters
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: this week. Yes, there are concerns that some people have,
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: but if you are people breaking the law and not
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: paying their taxes, one way to track them is through
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: the banking measure. I think six hundred dollars. That's a
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: negotiation that will go on as to what the amount is.
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: But it's important, she says, it's more than just the
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: banks that are objecting to this. Coalition of associations including
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: heavy industry, insurance, construction, hotels, RV dealers, and more are
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: now joining the Banking Association, penning a strongly worded letter
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: of Pelosi and House Minority Leader Ken McCarthy, saying, quote,
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: this proposal would create significant operational and reputational challenges for
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: financial institutions because people won't trust us, they won't want
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: to put their money with us, they won't want to
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: have bank accounts with US. Increased tax preparation costs for
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: individuals and small business owners would also skyrocket, which is unfair.
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: While the state of goal of this vast data collection,
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: and that's exactly what it is, vast data collection on you,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: where you spend your money, how you spend your money,
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: and then we can politically harass you if you spend
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: your money in places we don't like. That's what this is.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: This is no different than what the same people did
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: with Obama when they were targeting Tea Party members and
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: Tea Party groups. Quote. While the state of goal of
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: this vast data collections is to uncover tax dodging by
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: the wealthy, this proposal is not remotely targeted to that
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: purpose or that population, the banks have said in response,
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: and they're right. In addition to the significant privacy concerns,
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: it would create tremendous liability for all affected parties by
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: requiring the collection of financial information for nearly every American
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: without proper explanation of how the IRS will store, how
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: the IRS will protect and use this enormous trove of
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: personal financial information against them. Never trust the government. Privacy concerns,
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: by the way, your side is one of the top
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: reasons why individuals actually choose not to open financial bank
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: accounts to participate in the financial system, including retirement savings,
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: because they don't trust the government. House Ways and Means
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: Committee Chairman Richard Neil said the six hundred dollars transaction
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: amount for an entire year, which is fifty dollars a month,
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: will likely be raised. So everybody calmed down. They said, look,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: we might even raise this highest ten thousand dollars. Okay,
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: do the math on ten thousand dollars. That's only five
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: hundred dollars a month. How many people have more than
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: five hundred dollars a month to come in or out
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: of their bank account? That could be two fifty two
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: fifty out. Bam, y'r at five hundred if you have
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: if you have any type of car note, or mortgage
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: or rent, you're already hitting five hundred dollars a month
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: and money coming in and out of your account. Again,
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: this is about targeting every American citizen, every American with
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: a bank account. This is not about catching the risks.
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: Is about a unlimited amount of power the IRS would
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: have to basically spy on your every transaction and you
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: would be under an IRS audit indefinitely. That is what
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: this is. Houston Rockets owner, a man that's got a
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: bunch of restaurants. He came out. Tillman Fatita, the owner
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: of the Houston Rockets and several other businesses, came out yesday,
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: warning during an interview this week that the Democrats passed
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: this tax plan on unrealized, for example, capital gains which
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: they would be monitoring with your bank account. He said,
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: it would quote destroy capitalism the United States of America.
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: He said. Not only do we have a supply chain
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: crisis currently impacting consumers and causing the poorest people the most,
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: he said, some major contributing factors surging inflation rates. But
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: he said, then if you do this with taxes, it's
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: game over. He said his companies alone, there were more
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: than four thousand openings across his businesses restaurants, and entertainment industry.
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: When asked about this quote supposed billionaire tax, he said
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: that if it passes, it will make me not build
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: as much because I won't have the ability to create
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: so many more jobs. He's right, but this isn't just
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: about going after him. This is about going after you
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: and spying on you forever and having the IRS monitor
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: your transactions and then quite possibly target you for where
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: your money goes. You want to know how crazy they've
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: gotten over there at the Treasury Department, Let me just
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: read you this headline. Biden's Treasury secretary is adding now
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: counselors that you're paying for to address systemic racism in
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: the economy. This is how woke they've gotten. President Joe
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: Biden's Treasury Department announce has created a new post to
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: combat allege racial inequities racial inequality issues in the banking
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: and other financial services industry, throw down the race Card.
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: Treasury Secretary Yelling said on Monday that a former JP
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: Morgan Chase executive quote is part of a multi pronged
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: strategy by the Biden administration to deal with systemic racism
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: found in many parts of our economy, and they're going
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: to correct it. Treasury must play a central role quote
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: in ensuring that our economy recovers from the pandemic. It
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: recovers in a way that addresses the inequalities that exist
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: long before anyone was infected with COVID nineteen. So now
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: the Treasury Department is going to be the race police
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: for financial transactions. Joining me now to get a real
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: update on this is a man that is fighting very
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: hard right now in Washington, DC on this budget issues.
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: US Center, Bill Haggardy Center. I appreciate you coming on
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: this morning and let's talk about where we are with
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: this new and it's a great way of putting it.
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: A woke economy. I mean, you have Biden's Treasury secretary
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: right now. He wants to add counselors to address quote
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: alleged systemic racism in the economy. This is not a joke.
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: This is what your tax dollars could be going to.
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: And they're saying, we're going to have to really come
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: after those that make any type of money. Do they
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: have the votes actually pull this off? Oh? Ben, First,
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: it's great to be back with you. You do such
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: a wonderful job of helping us illuminate for the American public.
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: The crazy stuff that's in this massive package. Just the
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: House bill alone is over twenty five hundred pages. They've
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: not been able to come to any agreement on how
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: to pay for it. It's like a searchler firing squad
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: within the Democrat Party. And when you talk about this
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: woke economy, the various provisions they're putting out to views
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: and misuse the tax system, the government financial regulations, all
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: of this to push a social agenda. There woke agenda,
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: you know, this notion that their systemic racism and everything
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: from where a highway is placed to how a bank
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: account is open. It's absolutely crazy. Again, they're trying to
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: find ways to divide America. That's how they think they
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: wins through division. That's not the American way though, that's
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: certainly not my approach to things. We need to find
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: things that uniteds that will keep bringing America forward as
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: the greatest nation in the world, the most you know,
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: the most incredible nation that any of us have ever seen.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: The world needs strong American leadership, and what this group
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: is trying to do is tear us down. You know,
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: you look at one of the things that has gotten
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: some headlines, but I don't think many people truly understand
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: the ramifications of this idea that the IRS could spy
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: on your bank account. If you've got a bank account
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: with the last number I heard, with six hundred dollars
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: in it, they will be reporting that to the IRS.
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: I don't think a lot of people understand the ramifications
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: of what that means, what that would mean for so
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: many Americans with the IRS spying on you, explain where
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: we are with that provision. And so many Democrats want
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: this because that would give the IRS total control to
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: basically monitor your every financial move indefinitely. Then this is
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: just like something you would expect from the Chinese Communist
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: Party at the levels they're talking about. Whether it's six thousand,
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: one thousand, whatever, any person that's moving in, any person
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: that's moving normal amounts of money in and out of
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: their accounts, a paycheck or rent payment, that type of thing.
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: You're going to cross a six hundred dollars thor I
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: shold one transaction, a ten thousand dollars thor I shold
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: your cross pretty quickly because it's the cumulative amount of
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: money that you run through your account. Here's what's going
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: to happen You're going to see people shut down their accounts.
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: I've talked with community bankers across the nation. Their customers
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: are telling them that if this were passed, they're just
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: going to shut their account down. They don't want to
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: be monitor of the American public, does not want to
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: have the government snooping on them every turn. They don't
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: want a permanent audit underway by the irs. The RUST
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: is talking about hiring thousands of new agents and basically subjecting,
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: you know, everybody that's got a bank account to a
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: permanent audit status. This is not going to work. Joe
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: Manchin is now to old President Biden that it's a
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: non starter for him. This is one of their biggest
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: quote pay for wars. They've assumed that all Americans cheat
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: on their taxes, and they're gonna be able to pay
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: for this massive socialism by coming back and harvesting Americans
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: tax returns and finding new money. It's like shaking the
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: couch and finding coins in the in the crevices. This
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: is not going to get through. Um. I think it's
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: it's going to be had another dead un arrival plan
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: just as bad as this wealth tax idea. Let's talk
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: about the wealth tax idea real quick, because that's something
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: and you know, I worry when I hear things about
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: these as one friend referred to the banker referred it
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: to me this week. He goes, you know, this is
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: nothing more than the irs becoming the financial Gestapo. They're
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: going to monitor everything you do in your bank accounts.
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: He then mentioned the wealth tax, which you just talked
• 21:06
  Speaker 1: about and basically punishing people for being successful, or being wealthy,
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: or taking risk and building companies and investment. You'll look
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: at guys and when you see these big numbers like
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk has got more net wealth, they say than
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: nex On Mobile. Now, which to me is great. But
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: the guy took unbelievable risk and could have easily gone
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: financially bankrupt fifty times over for doing something that many
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: people believe was impossible for him to do. He pulled
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: it off. Look at how many people he employs. Now,
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: it's not like he's a drag on society. He is
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: in many ways fundamentally changed society. And yet the Democrats
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: still want to demonize hard work in America. Where are
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: we with this tax? Well, you think about who the
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: author is this program. It's Bernie Saunders and Elizabeth Warren
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: In what world did the American public elect Bernie Saunders
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: to be the author of their economy? And what world
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: could you have imagined? It declared socials who would be,
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: you know, destroying the American economy within nine months of
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden's arrival in office. This is not what the
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: American public voted for. This wealth tax that they're talking
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: about will be the most transformational tax that's happened since
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: the income tax was introduced back in nineteen thirteen. And
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: I'll bring you back to nineteen thirteen then, just the
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: pive perspective. In nineteen thirteen, the highest tax rate at
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: that point was going to be seven percent. That's single
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: digit seven percent, and that was going to be on
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: wealth that if you converted it to modern dollars, people
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: that made over fourteen million dollars. It sounds pretty similar
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: to what we're hearing right now. It's only going to
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: only going to affect the millionaires and billionaires. Well, as
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: soon as they get a program like this in place
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: and they need to pay for the next one, they'll
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: just start sliding that scale found further and further and
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: further until they hit every one of us. That's exactly
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: where this would go. They've got, you know, the notion
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: that they can transform the tax code in such a
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: fundamental way and get it done by this weekend when
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: we haven't even seen the first bit of text. It's posterous. Well,
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: this goes back to the most brilliant This goes back
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: the most brilliant political move that we've ever seen, and
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: that is the normalization. And it happened in real time
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: with Obamacare. Of quote, we won't know what's in the
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: bill until after we passed the bill, and when when
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: they were able to pull that off with Obamacare. Anything
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: Democrats know is revolutionizing the way that things work in DC.
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: And I don't say that in a complimentary way. They
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: basically hold the bill to the very last moment. They
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: dump it on the American people, They dump it on
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: you guys in Congress and say good luck trying to
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: figure this out by the time you've got to vote
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: on it. And that's exactly what their stragedy is with
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: this bill yet again. Yeah, yeah, well you saw that
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: with me when when I thought the so called infrastructure bill,
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: and you helped me get the word out on that
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: they dropped they dumped that on us and wanted to
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: vote the minute the CBO Congressional Budget Office came out
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: with the scoring that this so called infrastructure bill was
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: going to be paid for as they said. It turned
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: out that it was over a quarter of a trillion
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: dollars short. We got the information. The response of the
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: Democrat leadership was, let's go ahead and accelerate it and
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: vote it through to night without even seeing what's in it.
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: And I said no. I was one of a hundred,
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: but I stopped that bill. It was very unpleasant, made
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: me very unpopular, but we spent five days fighting. Then
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: I probably got two hours of sleep at night, and
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: we let the American public know what was in that bill.
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: I got five of my colleagues to move over and
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: vote with me. I wish I'd gotten more, but we
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: opened the American public's eyes. And now there the other
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: of savvy to what's happening here with this larger bill,
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: because that was just the front door. The Infrastructure Bill
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: was just the beginning of what we're seeing right now
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: with this much larger, quote human infrastructure Bill, which has
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: again nothing more than a step toward big government socialism,
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: A big step in that direction. What is the you know,
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: I know you have friends that are Democrats in the Senate.
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: Senate and if you've ever lived or worked in DC,
• 24:55
  Speaker 1: there are a lot of candid conversations that do happen
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: behind the scenes. When the best line that the White
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: House can come up with is the biggest lie that's
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: been told in a long time, which is trillions of
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: dollars in spending, Well, I won't cost you a thing.
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: Everybody knows it's a lie. Our Democrats even rolling their
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: eyes at that, are they just saying, hey, it's a
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: ways to mean, say whatever lie you got to say
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: to get this done. I think it's all about power
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: for them, It's about transforming America, and they believe that
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: if they can get something through one, it may help
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: him in this Virginia governor's election that they're in the
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: process of losing two. It arms Joe Biden with something
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: to take to his big time climate summit over in Europe.
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: He's on his way to Europe this weekend, to Glasgow,
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: Scotland next week. And after they embarrass themselves so finally
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: with Afghanistan, I mean that debacle in Afghanistan soaps that
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: our European Allies and NATO. Obama I mean sorry. Biden
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: wants to redeem his reputation with the Club in Europe
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: and he wants to bring over a massive climate package
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: to show that he's got something that he can offer them.
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: Despite the fact that it's going to devast data our economy,
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: the Europeans are gonna love it because it takes us
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: down the same lane that they're on towards socialism. It
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: weakens our economy, it makes us less competitives. Of course
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: they're gonna like it. There's no doubt. Last question for you,
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: and I want to get if view guys, do we
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: know how much this is going to cost us? And
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: what does this new role have and what power does have?
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: President Joe Biden's Treasury Secretary department announced it has created
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: this new post. I mentioned it earlier to quote combat
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: alleged racial inequalities and issues in banking and other financial industries.
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: The Treasury Secretary Yellen set on Monday that the former
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: JP Morgan Chase executive that she is appointed as part
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: of a quote, multi pronged strategy by the Biden administration
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: to deal with systemic racism found in many parts of
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: our economy. The Treasury quote must play a central role
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: in ensuring that our economy recovers from the pandemic. It
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: recovers in a way that addresses the inequality that exist
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: long long before that anyone was infected with COVID nineteen.
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: The statement reads, I don't even know what this means.
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: What are you going to do with the Treasury Department
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: working with racial equity efforts? What does this mean from
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: and who are they going to go after? Well, again,
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: this is one of these announcements by the administration that's
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: backed up with no facts and no game plan. Again,
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: this is a headline that sort of excites and serves
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: their woke constituency on the far far left. But how
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: do you implement something like this? It makes no sense.
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: You know, loan should be made based on the economics,
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: They shouldn't be made based on racial criteria. It seems
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: that they want to introduce racism and everything that they
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: do because again, that divides America, and their view is
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: that by dividing our nation they're going to conquer it
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: in some way. Chinese love that. They like to see
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: this happen. Our adversaries love this. But what we need
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: to be doing is putting capital into the economy in
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: an appropriate manner. Every action that they're taking is taking
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: actions that will actually reduce the amount of capital coming
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: into the economy. By raising taxes on corporations, by raising
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: taxes as individuals, by raising taxes on capital gains, are
• 28:13
  Speaker 1: going to freeze capital gains in place. People aren't going
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: to liquidate their investments, and they're not going to roll
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: them into new, more productive investments that will keep the
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: economy growing. They don't understand how the economy works. They
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: just look for headline after headline without thinking through the
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: second and third order effects. This is just one more
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: example of that. It's incredible Center. I appreciate your time.
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: I hope you guys are successful in stopping at least
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: some of this. I know that they're going to do
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: something big. It's the question is how much of this
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: can we get rid of before they pass it. You
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: are still a domestic terrace. That's ripe. The Attorney General
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: of the the United States America A. G. Garland, is refusing
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: to withdraw his memo, declaring that if you're a parent
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: that speaks out at a school board meeting, that we
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: will not look any differently than what could possibly be
• 29:02
  Speaker 1: declared as a domestic terrorist. After shocking testimony before the
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: United States Senate, Garland is refusing to back down. In fact,
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: we now know there's a new memo that tells his
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: prosecutors law enforcement how to come after parents, even if
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: you just do something as simple as making a phone
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: call expressing your thoughts to a school board member, that
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: could then turn you into a domestic terrorist. Nowaday's podcast,
• 29:35
  Speaker 1: we're going to have US Center Marsha Blackburn, who actually
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: questioned Attorney General Garland over this issue in just a moment.
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: But before I get to all of this shocking audio
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: and to the Senator, I want to ask you to
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: do me a favor. Please make sure number one, you
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: hit the subscribe button to our podcast or the auto
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: download button so that you can get the show every day.
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: Number two, please share this podcast with your family and friends,
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: because everyone in this country needs to know that we
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: now have an Attorney general a tyrant under the regime
• 30:13
  Speaker 1: of Biden, and under Biden's command, they are going to
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: come after parents for expressing their thoughts and feelings, and
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: they're criminalizing your freedom of speech, your freedom of expression,
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: and they want to treat you not want they are
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: treating you the same way they treated terrorists. After nine
• 30:33
  Speaker 1: to eleven, parents, you may be a domestic terrorists under
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: the new guidelines from the Attorney General Garland if you
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: show up or make a phone call, or organize on
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: Facebook against people that are trying to indoctrinate your children
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: in our public school systems. Earlier today, I spoke with
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: Marsha Blackburn as she got to have a very blunt
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: discussion with the Attorney General Garland. I'm going to have
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: that for you coming up in a moment. Now, I
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: want to play for you some incredible audio from Senator
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: Ted Cruz, who actually questioned the Attorney General Garland over
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: the anti parent memo. A memo that turns parents into
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: domestic terrorists, a memo that tells prosecutors basically a dozen
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: plus ways to prosecute parents for being involved in their kids'
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: lives and for having basically, we're now criminalizing freedom of
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: speech and freedom of thought. Now, Center Ted Cruz a
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: brilliant legal mind. A lot of people think of him
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: more as a senator now he's I would argue a
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: senator second, and a brilliant political a brilliant legal mind. First,
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: and that's why I'm going to play this audio because
• 31:45
  Speaker 1: it's incredible to watch him dismantle the insanity of Garland,
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: the Attorney General the United States of America, and the
• 31:51
  Speaker 1: Biden regime who are coming after parents for just speaking
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: up about their kids' education. Take a listen. For eight
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: years under Barack Obama, the Department of Justice was politicized
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: and weaponized. When you came before this committee in your
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: confirmation hearing, you promised things would be different. I asked
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: you specifically, quote will you commit to this committee that,
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: under your leadership, the Department of Justice will not target
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: the political opponents of this administration. Here was your answer,
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: quote absolutely, It's totally inappropriate for the Department to target
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: any individual because of their politics or their position in
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: a campaign. That was your promise just a few months ago.
• 32:34
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry to say you have broken that promise. There
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: is a difference between law and politics. And General Garland,
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: you know the difference between law and politics. Law is
• 32:46
  Speaker 1: based on facts, It is impartial, It is not used
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: as a tool of political retribution. This memo was not law.
• 32:57
  Speaker 1: This memo was politics. Now Center, Ted Cruz is absolutely
• 33:04
  Speaker 1: right that this memo was one hundred percent a political
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: decision made by the Attorney General to come after parents
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: and attack parents, and to treat them not even equate
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: to actually treat them, to treat you, as a concerned
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: parent about your kids education as a domestic terrorists the
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: same way that we treated domestic terrorists after nine eleven.
• 33:26
  Speaker 1: That is a fact. They made a decision politically because
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: a powerful teachers' union decided to send out a request
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: to shut parents up, going, hey, we don't like these
• 33:40
  Speaker 1: parents getting involved here, right, Like these parents that have
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: kind of gotten woken up, we kind of need you
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: guys to shut them up. We don't we feel threatened,
• 33:50
  Speaker 1: right because we're all woke. We feel threatened as we
• 33:53
  Speaker 1: try to indoctrinate their kids, try to cover up heinous
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: crimes that are being committed against their kids. Two different
• 34:00
  Speaker 1: rapes were covered up in Loudon County, for example. You're
• 34:03
  Speaker 1: hilmer about that in a moment, because the school board
• 34:06
  Speaker 1: didn't want to let it be known that their transgender
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: bathroom policy allowed for a guy dressed like a chick
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: in a skirt to go into a bathroom and rape
• 34:15
  Speaker 1: two different people. They moved him actually from one school
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: to another school just to make it go away. And
• 34:21
  Speaker 1: when the kid got the second school, he did it again,
• 34:23
  Speaker 1: sexually assaulted another girl because they didn't want it to
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: make their transgendered bathroom woke rules look bad, and this
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: kid would make them look bad. So instead of protecting
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: your child, they decided then instead they would protect their
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: woke ideas, their ideals, whatever the hell you want to
• 34:41
  Speaker 1: call them. They're an anarchy, they're insanity, their psychotic nature
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: that they believe that they own your children, and you
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: have nothing you can say about your children. They own
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: your children, and you must shut up and you must
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: be silent. This goes back to exactly the big fight
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: that is happening right now in Virginia. What's happening in
• 35:04
  Speaker 1: Virginia right now is you have a fight because you
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: have a governor that said publicly multiple times on stage.
• 35:09
  Speaker 1: Parents should have no right to dictate and or tell
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: school boards what we should or shouldn't be teaching your kids.
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: You have no rights. When you drop your kids off.
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: Your kid is a product, a property of the state.
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: It's probably the best way I can describe it. Your
• 35:27
  Speaker 1: child becomes property of the state. And that's exactly how
• 35:33
  Speaker 1: they're going to treat your kid. When you drop your
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: kid off, you can shut up. When you drop your
• 35:39
  Speaker 1: kid off, you can shut up and leave us alone.
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: If you show up and you talk to us, we
• 35:43
  Speaker 1: will treat you like you're a member of ISIS or
• 35:45
  Speaker 1: al Qaida, and legally we will come after you. In fact,
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: we have a dozen plus ways. The Attorney General has
• 35:51
  Speaker 1: now said that we can come after you. That is
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: what they are doing. What if you don't shop for schoolboard,
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: but you make a phone call, we've criminalized that now.
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: Senator take Cruz talked about it in this memo. How
• 36:07
  Speaker 1: parents now their behavior of calling being involved is criminalized
• 36:11
  Speaker 1: at a federal level. On Wednesday, September twenty ninth, the
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: National school Board Association wrote a letter to the President
• 36:22
  Speaker 1: asking the President to use the Department of Justice to
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: target parents that were upset at critical race theory that
• 36:28
  Speaker 1: we're upset at mass mandates in schools, to target them
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: as domestic terrorists. On the face of the letter, the
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: letter was in repeated consultation with the White House. In
• 36:39
  Speaker 1: explicit political consultation with the White House that was on Wednesday,
• 36:43
  Speaker 1: September twenty nine. Five days later on Monday, so right
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: after the weekend, boom, you pop out a memo giving
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: them exactly what they want. Now, by the way, I
• 36:55
  Speaker 1: understand that in politics that happens all the time. An
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: important special interest wants up, sir, Yes, sir, we're gonna
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: listen to him. Let me ask you something, General Garland,
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: in the letter which you told the House of Representative
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: was the basis for this abusive memo targeting parents. How
• 37:14
  Speaker 1: many incidents are cited in that memo. I have to
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: look back through the memo. I can't. You don't know
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: how many of them were violent? Again, the general repair,
• 37:26
  Speaker 1: how many of them were violent? Do you know? I
• 37:28
  Speaker 1: don't know. You don't know, And there's a reason you
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: don't know, because you didn't care, and nobody in your
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: office cared to find out. I did a quick count
• 37:38
  Speaker 1: just sitting here during this hearing. I counted twenty incidents cited.
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: Of the twenty fifteen on their face are nonviolent. They
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: involved things like insults. They involve a Nazi salute. That's
• 37:51
  Speaker 1: one of the examples. My god, a parent did a
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: Nazi saluted a school board because he thought the policies
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: were oppressive. General Garland is doing a Nazi salute an
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: elected official. Is that protected by the First Amendment? Yes,
• 38:03
  Speaker 1: it is, Okay, fifteen of the twenty, on the face
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: of it, are not violent. They're not threats of violence
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: their parents who are unhappy. Yet miraculously, when you write
• 38:14
  Speaker 1: a memo, the opening line of your memo in recent months,
• 38:19
  Speaker 1: there has been a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation and
• 38:23
  Speaker 1: threats of violence. You know what, you didn't look and
• 38:26
  Speaker 1: nobody on your on your staff, Look, did you even
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: look up the twenty instances? As I testified it, the
• 38:34
  Speaker 1: decision to make the send a memo is born a say,
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: did you look up the twenty instances? I did not read?
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: Did anyone on your staff look them up? I don't
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: know the answer, but it's but of course you don't.
• 38:44
  Speaker 1: In general, there's a reason. Look, you started your career
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: as a law clerk to Justice Brennan. You've had many
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: law clerks during the year. During your time as a judge,
• 38:56
  Speaker 1: I was a clerk to Chief Justice Rank Uist. I'll
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: tell you what if I ad an opinion for the
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: Chief Justice and walked in and it said there's a
• 39:03
  Speaker 1: disturbing pattern of violence. Well, Ted, how do you know that, well,
• 39:06
  Speaker 1: I got an ambocaust brave here who claims it you
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: would fire a law clark who did that. You're the
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: Attorney General of the United States. This was not a
• 39:17
  Speaker 1: tweet you sent. This is a memo to the Federal
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: Bureau of Investigations saying, go investigate parents as domestic terrorists.
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: That is not what the memo says at all. Is
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: it what the letter says? That is not is it
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: what the letter says? By the way, the point take
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: Cruise is making here is your letter says exactly that
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: it didn't matter what the law says, because your letter
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: says something totally different. You have weaponized the United States
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: government to go after children, or excuse me, go after
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: parents of children who are just raising concerns about what
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: you're doing to their children, and you're treating them like
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: domestic terrorists. And the scary part is I'm going to
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: he playing this is that Garland refuses to rescind this memo,
• 40:05
  Speaker 1: stands behind it wholeheartedly that any parent that gets out
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: of line or raises their voice, you will be treated
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: quite possibly the domestic terrorists and arrested. And we have
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: a playbook of how to arrest you. We have a
• 40:18
  Speaker 1: list of things we can charge you with. Senator Cruz
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: and the point that he is making with his conversation
• 40:28
  Speaker 1: with the Attorney General United States America, Garland, is none
• 40:30
  Speaker 1: of what you have done attacking parents and treating them
• 40:35
  Speaker 1: like domestic terrorists when in fact they're not, They're just
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: concerned parents. Is raising their voices to those that are
• 40:41
  Speaker 1: trying to destroy their kids' lives is based in law.
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: And you're the Attorney General of the United States of
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: America and you write an anti parent memo because you
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: believe that the parents have no rights their children. The
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: state owns those children and gets to indoctrinate those children.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: And that is not all. That is propaganda. That is politics.
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: And by the way, I think Garland knows that that's
• 41:06
  Speaker 1: exactly right. You're the Attorney General of the United States.
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: This was not a tweet you sent. This is a
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: memo to the Federal Bureau of Investigations saying, go investigate
• 41:20
  Speaker 1: parents as domestic terrorists. That is not what the memo
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: says at all. Is it what the letter says? That
• 41:26
  Speaker 1: is not what is it what the letter says. I
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: don't care what the letter says. You don't care. You
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: said it was the basis of your memo. You testified
• 41:33
  Speaker 1: under oath before the House of Representatives. The letter was
• 41:36
  Speaker 1: the basis of your memo. Now you don't care about
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: the letter. The letter and public reports of violence and
• 41:41
  Speaker 1: threats of violence. My memo says nothing about domestic terrorism,
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: says nothing about parents committing any such things. My memo
• 41:49
  Speaker 1: is an attempt to get an assessment of whether there
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: is a problem out there that the federal government needs
• 41:54
  Speaker 1: to The letter, on its face says the actions of
• 41:58
  Speaker 1: the apparents could be the equivalent to a form of
• 42:00
  Speaker 1: domestic terrorism that is wrong, and asks the President to
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: use the Patriot Act in regards to domestic terrorism erected
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: at parents. This was the basis of your memo. The
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice, when you're directing the FBI to engage
• 42:16
  Speaker 1: in law enforcement, you're not behaving as a political operative
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: because a political ally of the president says, hey, go
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: attack these parents because we don't like what they're saying.
• 42:29
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice, you did no independent research on what
• 42:32
  Speaker 1: was happening? Did you? The memo has nothing to do
• 42:37
  Speaker 1: with part. Did you do independent research the memo? Did
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: you do independent research? Memo has nothing to do. You're
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: not answering that questions. You've testified you know nothing about
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: the violent sexual assault that happened in Loudon County, even
• 42:50
  Speaker 1: though it's one of the bases in this letter. I
• 42:53
  Speaker 1: read about it since then. By the way, the point
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: you're about to hear is so important. This goes back
• 42:59
  Speaker 1: to the parents and the school board. You have a
• 43:02
  Speaker 1: school board in Loudon County, as I mentioned earlier, that
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: covered up the rape of a student because it would
• 43:08
  Speaker 1: go it would hurt their transgender policy because it's a
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: dude wearing a skirt that when the girl's bathroom and
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: rape not one, but now we know two different girls.
• 43:17
  Speaker 1: And instead of actually and by the way, the kid
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: has been found guilty of one of those crimes, they
• 43:24
  Speaker 1: covered it up, moved in to another school, covered it up,
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: and just moved him down the road. It's like the
• 43:32
  Speaker 1: Catholic church where they would do with a priest that
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: were molesting children, just move them to another church. Right,
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: who cares? We don't want to admit that we have
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: a problem, so let's just cover it up. That's the
• 43:45
  Speaker 1: easiest way to deal with this, Just flat out cover
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: it up. It's exactly why I Senator Tom Cotton said
• 43:53
  Speaker 1: that the ag should resign. Yeah, he actually said he
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: should resign over what he has done because it's such
• 44:00
  Speaker 1: a disgrace. You guys have weaponized the Department of Justice.
• 44:08
  Speaker 1: You have politicized it to the point where now you're
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: treating parents like domestic tears. And you have parents. All
• 44:15
  Speaker 1: they're doing is standing up for their children. That's it,
• 44:21
  Speaker 1: that's all you're doing. Let me tell you what the
• 44:24
  Speaker 1: judge found in the Loudon County case before I get
• 44:27
  Speaker 1: back to this audio real quick. The judge isn't announced
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: an explosive Loudon County school bathroom ruling finding this fifteen
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: year old boy guilty of sexual assault in the girl's bathroom,
• 44:38
  Speaker 1: and the school covered it up. And then the father
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: who lost his mind when the school board covered up,
• 44:44
  Speaker 1: was arrested and treated like a domestic terrorist. Don't forget
• 44:47
  Speaker 1: that part of this story. Okay. The father went to
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: the school board, the school board lied, he got angry,
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: he started yelling, They slammed him the floor, arrested him
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: and took him out of the school board meeting and
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: treating to him like a domestic terrorist because he was
• 45:04
  Speaker 1: mad that a school board covered up the fact that
• 45:06
  Speaker 1: a fifteen year old boy who has now been found guilty,
• 45:09
  Speaker 1: So this is enough for interpretation. It's a fact now
• 45:11
  Speaker 1: the fifteen year old boy has been found guilty of
• 45:13
  Speaker 1: sexual assault in the girls' bathroom of the man's daughter.
• 45:18
  Speaker 1: The ruling comes into the controversial of transgender school bathroom
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: accommodations in Loudon County Woke, Virginia, because the bathroom Woke
• 45:28
  Speaker 1: agenda for transgender accommodations was more important than actually protecting
• 45:33
  Speaker 1: a child from being raped by a dude wearing a
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: skirt in a bathroom in the girl's bathroom. The charge
• 45:41
  Speaker 1: include one felony account of fortunabal sad to me in
• 45:43
  Speaker 1: one felony account of rape. The judge Pamela Brooks rolled
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: I found the fact sufficient to support the charges. The
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: victim said the two were quote just friends and said
• 45:52
  Speaker 1: she never gave permission or consent for the encounter. And
• 45:55
  Speaker 1: this is exactly what the school board covered up because
• 45:58
  Speaker 1: they couldn't stand end press that would make them look
• 46:02
  Speaker 1: like idiots, that would show them that allowing dudes into
• 46:05
  Speaker 1: chick's bathrooms was a bad idea. The boy, who was
• 46:09
  Speaker 1: fourteen years old at the time, text the victim master
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: and meet him in the girl's bathroom. He threw her
• 46:13
  Speaker 1: to the four forced himself upon her. According the Washington Post,
• 46:16
  Speaker 1: he flipped me over. She said, I was on the
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: ground and couldn't move, and he sexually assaulted me. But hey,
• 46:24
  Speaker 1: Virginia Department of Education says it's trans enter policies required
• 46:27
  Speaker 1: that quote access to facilities such as restrooms and locker
• 46:31
  Speaker 1: rooms that correspond to his student's gender identity shall be
• 46:35
  Speaker 1: available to all students, and Louden Kenney said, absolutely, We're
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: going to do it because we think this is great.
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: We think this is great. Listen to the lack of
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: compassion that Garland has for the girl. The girls I
• 46:49
  Speaker 1: should say that were raped. Hey, you told the house
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: last week you know nothing about it? Not no at
• 46:55
  Speaker 1: the time. Now, okay. This week, the court concluded that
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: a fourteen year old girl was violently raped by a
• 47:04
  Speaker 1: boy wearing a skirt in the girl's restroom. The school
• 47:07
  Speaker 1: district covered it up, release the boy sent him to
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: another school where he violently raped another girl. The father
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: who mister Holly just showed you was the father of
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: the first girl. He was understandably, do you understand why
• 47:24
  Speaker 1: a parent would be upset when your daughter is raped
• 47:27
  Speaker 1: at school, the school board covers it up and then
• 47:30
  Speaker 1: lies to you and claims there have been no assaults.
• 47:33
  Speaker 1: We have no instances of assaults in our bathroom, and
• 47:37
  Speaker 1: that was a flat out lie, as the court concluded
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: this week, do you understand why the parent would be upset? Absolutely?
• 47:42
  Speaker 1: And is any expressions of upset are completely protected by
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: the first Except you just called him a domestic terror.
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: Never called him that. That's not this letter calls him
• 47:51
  Speaker 1: a domestic terrorist. You based a direction to the FBI,
• 47:55
  Speaker 1: an official direction from the Attorney General on this letter.
• 47:58
  Speaker 1: And I'll tell you what. The The NSBA is so
• 48:01
  Speaker 1: embarrassed to this letter. They've apologized for it and retracted it.
• 48:05
  Speaker 1: But you don't apparently have the same willingness to apologize
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: and retract what you did. Let me ask you something else.
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: A big part of this letter is that they're upset
• 48:14
  Speaker 1: about parents not wanting critical race theory taught. But by
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: the way, let me let me jump back in here,
• 48:19
  Speaker 1: because I want to go back to this father that
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: was arrested, because I think it's really important for you
• 48:24
  Speaker 1: to understand the father. Now you heard Centator Ted Cruze
• 48:28
  Speaker 1: just mentioned his colleague, Senator Holly, had had said something
• 48:32
  Speaker 1: moments before about this father. He brings out the picture
• 48:36
  Speaker 1: of his father being slammed to the four, his clothes
• 48:39
  Speaker 1: being ripped, and police officers treating him like a domestic terrorist.
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: And Holly's point is, you think this guy should be arrested.
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: You have a schoolboard that cover up the rape of
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: his daughter, and then that school, that same boy who
• 48:54
  Speaker 1: was dressed like a girl went to another school and
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: did it again. And you don't think that guy's can
• 48:58
  Speaker 1: raise his voice at you and be angry when you're
• 48:59
  Speaker 1: covering it, and then you arrest him and treat him
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: like a terrorist. Listen to this back and forth to
• 49:03
  Speaker 1: the Attorney General. Mister Chairman, Attorney General Garland, October fourth,
• 49:08
  Speaker 1: you issued an unprecedented memo that involves the Department of
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: Justice and the FBI and local school district's local school boards.
• 49:15
  Speaker 1: Nothing like it in our country's history. It was based
• 49:18
  Speaker 1: you've testified on this letter from the National school Board
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: Association that we now know the White House was involved
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: in writing. They've retracted the letter, They've apologized for the letter.
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: They say they regret the letter but you won't retract
• 49:30
  Speaker 1: the memo and said earlier that you have no regrets,
• 49:33
  Speaker 1: and you've defended yourself repeatedly today before this committee by sing, well,
• 49:36
  Speaker 1: you're focused on violence. But now, of course we've seen
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: the memo from your own Justice Department advising state and
• 49:43
  Speaker 1: local and other prosecutors about all of the different federal
• 49:47
  Speaker 1: causes of action that they can bring against parents that
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: are not about violence. They're about harassment and intimidation. I'm
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: looking here at this memo. It identifies no fewer than
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: third teen possible federal crimes involving harassment and intimidation, including
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: making annoying phone calls. Do you think a parent, by
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: the way, just thinking about that, they give it thirteen
• 50:15
  Speaker 1: different things you can do to come after parents, including
• 50:17
  Speaker 1: making annoying phone calls. So if you're this dad, your
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: daughter's raped, you find out, they release the kid, don't
• 50:23
  Speaker 1: charge the kid, and cover it up, and you make
• 50:25
  Speaker 1: a phone call and you're angry with a school board member,
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: should that mean that you are domestic terrorists? Think about that.
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: If you're a parent who makes a phone call to
• 50:35
  Speaker 1: a school board member that she has elected, that that
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: school board member deems annoying to be prosecuted, General Girland, No,
• 50:41
  Speaker 1: I don't, And the Supreme Court has made quite clear
• 50:44
  Speaker 1: that the word intimidation with respect to the Constitutional protection,
• 50:48
  Speaker 1: it's one that directs a threat to a person with
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: the intent of placing the victim in fear of bodily
• 50:54
  Speaker 1: harm or death. Prosecutors who investigate these cases know the
• 50:59
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court this is a very famous case. Prosecutors do,
• 51:03
  Speaker 1: but parents don't. General Garland, do you do you think
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: that a parent who looks at the thirteen different federal
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: crimes that your Justice Department has identified they might be
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: subject to and prosecuted for, like making annoying phone calls?
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: Do you think that they're going to feel that they're
• 51:20
  Speaker 1: welcome to speak up at a school board meeting. How
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: about this one? They could be prosecuted for using the Internet.
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: I guess that would be Facebook in a way that
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: might cause emotional distress. Let's talk about the emotional discress
• 51:30
  Speaker 1: that Holly is mentioning right here. What the center Holly
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: is saying is, if you're a parent and you organize
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: a Facebook group page, or even just a post on
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: your own page to get parents to show up or
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: make phone calls, or to come to a school board meeting,
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: or to start emailing and texting and calling a school
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: board member that's gone rogue, or there's covering up a
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: sexual assault. You will be treated like a domestic terrorist.
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: In fact, the Attorney General put down a memo saying,
• 51:54
  Speaker 1: here's thirteen ways to shut these parents up. Here's thirteen
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: ways to turn these parents into mastic terrorists to a victim,
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: is that is that a crime of violence? Senator, I
• 52:04
  Speaker 1: haven't seen the memo that you're why haven't out and
• 52:07
  Speaker 1: I don't And even from the description, it doesn't sound
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: like it was addressed to parents. But if you know,
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: it wasn't addressed to parents, it was addresed a prosecutors.
• 52:15
  Speaker 1: That's the problem. Why haven't you seen the memo? I know?
• 52:19
  Speaker 1: That's how dumb Garland all of a sudden, is right.
• 52:21
  Speaker 1: I didn't write the memo. This is the memo going
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: out to all of his prosecutors all over the country saying,
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: here is the list of things that you can do
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: to prosecute parents. Here's the ways of prosecutem here's what
• 52:35
  Speaker 1: you charge them with federal crimes over and Garland's like,
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: I hadn't seen the memo. Really, I don't know why
• 52:40
  Speaker 1: I haven't. I don't look at every I have. I
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: do not get every memo that every US attorney sends out.
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: But if you're wait, wait, don't don't, I don't. I
• 52:48
  Speaker 1: just want to be sure I understand this. This This
• 52:50
  Speaker 1: is a memorandum that collects thirteen different federal crimes parents
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: could be charged with. It has United States Department of
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: Justice on the top of it, and you're telling me
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: you haven't seen it was a memo from Senator, the
• 53:04
  Speaker 1: United States Department of Justice, United States Attorney for the
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: District of Montana. I have not seen a memo from
• 53:09
  Speaker 1: the District of Montana. Not high enough priority for you,
• 53:13
  Speaker 1: That's not the question. I don't it is the question.
• 53:15
  Speaker 1: Answer my question. Is it not a high enough priority
• 53:17
  Speaker 1: for you? When you're threatening parents with thirteen different federal crimes?
• 53:22
  Speaker 1: These aren't crimes of violence. You've testified today, you're focused
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: on violence. That's not what your US attorneys they work
• 53:29
  Speaker 1: for you. That's not what they're saying. You haven't seen
• 53:32
  Speaker 1: it because it's not a high enough priority or what
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: question of priority? No one has sent me that memo,
• 53:36
  Speaker 1: so I haven't seen it. What do you mean no
• 53:38
  Speaker 1: one has sent you the memo. You run the United
• 53:39
  Speaker 1: States Department of Justice, do you not? Or one hundred
• 53:42
  Speaker 1: and fifteen thousand employees of the Department of Justice. Indeed,
• 53:46
  Speaker 1: and you are in charge of every one of them.
• 53:48
  Speaker 1: And this was a sufficiently important case that you issued
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: a memo. You over your signature, issued a memo involving
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: the FBI and the Department of Justice in local school boards,
• 54:00
  Speaker 1: local school districts. Your US attorneys are now threatening prosecution
• 54:04
  Speaker 1: with thirteen different crimes. But it's not a high enough
• 54:07
  Speaker 1: priority for you. We got lost in the mix. I'll
• 54:10
  Speaker 1: send again. I've never seen that memo. That's what concerns me.
• 54:14
  Speaker 1: General Garland, Well, it wasn't sent to me. I hope
• 54:17
  Speaker 1: you will assure your constituents that what we are concerned
• 54:19
  Speaker 1: about here is violence and threats of violence. I don't
• 54:23
  Speaker 1: believe him, by the way. I don't believe him at all.
• 54:26
  Speaker 1: I think it's what he's concerned with is shutting up,
• 54:29
  Speaker 1: in silencing parents who are actually standing up at school
• 54:32
  Speaker 1: board meetings, and doing it to the point where he says,
• 54:34
  Speaker 1: we're going to treat you like a tearst and you
• 54:35
  Speaker 1: may go to prison, and you may not see your
• 54:37
  Speaker 1: kids for years. We will throw away the key because
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: you spoke up at a meeting. US Senator Marsha Blackburne
• 54:45
  Speaker 1: is with me now to talk about this. Senator, I
• 54:47
  Speaker 1: want to play something else real quick and get your
• 54:50
  Speaker 1: reaction to it, because one of your colleagues, Senator Holly
• 54:53
  Speaker 1: Press eg on a dad being arrested a school board meeting.
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna play a little clip of this, and I
• 54:57
  Speaker 1: want to get your reaction because it's shocking to me
• 55:00
  Speaker 1: and it shows you just how I would argue evil.
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: The Attorney General his minions and the Biden administration is
• 55:06
  Speaker 1: attacking parents. Listen to this. Prosecutors do, but but parents don't.
• 55:11
  Speaker 1: General Garland, do you do you think that a parent
• 55:13
  Speaker 1: who looks at the thirteen different federal crimes that your
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: Justice Department has identified they might be subject to and
• 55:21
  Speaker 1: prosecuted for, like making annoying phone calls? Do you think
• 55:24
  Speaker 1: that they're going to feel that they're welcome to speak
• 55:26
  Speaker 1: up at a school board meeting? How about this one?
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: They could be prosecuted for using the Internet. I guess
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: that would be Facebook in a way that might cause
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: emotional distress to a victim. Is that a crime of violence? Sat, Senator,
• 55:39
  Speaker 1: you hear about these thirteen things that were laid out.
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: It's shocking now that if a parent organizes a group
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: of parents, which is how everybody seems to organize things
• 55:49
  Speaker 1: now at a grassroots level on Facebook, on social media,
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: that that could be used against him as a federal crime,
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: and you could be charged with federal crimes that would
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: make you a felon, put you in prison for organized
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: to show up at a school board meeting. And the
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: Attorney General acted like he didn't know this memo existed,
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: which is under his command. It was astanding the lack
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: of awareness and knowledge, and you have to realize, Ben
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: he seemed confused, he seemed frustrated, He was unprepared. He
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: seemed as if he was very distance from the activities
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: of his office. More that he is the figurehead and
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: he is not a leader. And it was very apparent
• 56:34
  Speaker 1: in that hearing yesterday. And I pressed him on who
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: wrote this memo and he would not answer me. Senator
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: Cruz followed me who wrote the memo? He would not
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: answer the Senator. I mean it went on and on
• 56:50
  Speaker 1: and on, because he said, well, he signed the memos
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: and then we went at him about the turnaround in time.
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: But back in August forty four of my Republican Senate
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: colleagues joined them on a letter to General Garland about
• 57:10
  Speaker 1: the Durham investigation to ask for a status update and
• 57:17
  Speaker 1: if they were going to make the reports public, and
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: we've never received an answer. But after we wrote it,
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: then they went on with the indictments and kind of
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: got the ball ruggling. But see it has been since August.
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: We are more than sixty days since we since that letter,
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: and now in four days they turned around this request
• 57:44
  Speaker 1: of a special interest group to the White House. We
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: know they had worked together on this, but we do
• 57:52
  Speaker 1: not know if someone in the White House wrote this letter,
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: this memo, if we SA Monico wrote it, if the
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: Scupta wrote it. We don't know who wrote the memo.
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: But we know that Merrick Garland signed a memo. And
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: you know he had said it first in the hearing,
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: and this was one of the big contradictions. He said
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: that he had done the memo based on the school
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: board letter. But then in response to my question when
• 58:27
  Speaker 1: I asked him later, I was further down to you.
• 58:30
  Speaker 1: So I came in and I said, we want to
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: know who wrote this memo and if in this memo
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: you are indeed calling people parents to be domestic terrorist,
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: labeling them as such. And he said, well, he did
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: it from the memo and and news report, so then
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: he wouldn't identify what news reports. And that's the part
• 58:59
  Speaker 1: is it's like, okay, so you're making policy, and just
• 59:01
  Speaker 1: so people understand how quickly this happened and how insane
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: this story is, because I've never seen the DOJ work
• 59:09
  Speaker 1: this way. You literally have a memo that comes out
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: from from a teacher's union saying, we want you to
• 59:15
  Speaker 1: stop these parents from getting involved, and we need you
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: to start treating them like domestic terrorists, and we want
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: you to use literally the laws that we use Patriot Act,
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: et cetera, that we use after nine to eleven to
• 59:25
  Speaker 1: target actual terrorists that were connected to al Qaeda, to
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: then go after parents. And then within days, basically within hours,
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: you have the DOJ rolling out a policy and then
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: a new memo says, here's thirteen ways you can basically
• 59:41
  Speaker 1: lock parents up. That's right, And that was the US
• 59:45
  Speaker 1: Attorney's memo that was the follow on. So you know
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: what we did was to make this point to them,
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: to him that we wanted to see what these news
• 59:57
  Speaker 1: reports are. So I said, well, why don't you do this.
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 1: You go back, you compile it, and you send it
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: to me in writing, so that we have this for
• 1:00:06
  Speaker 1: the record, so we can see what you were looking at.
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 1: That was so egregious that within four days, four days,
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: you do this memo. The other thing then Mary Garland
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: led the prosecution of Terry Nichols and Timothy McVey in
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: the Oklahoma City bombings. So I asked him if he
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: would classify parents in the same vein as Timothy McVeigh
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: and Terry Nichols, and he was like, oh, my goodness, no, no, no,
• 1:00:38
  Speaker 1: Well what had happened with Oklahoma City was they classified
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: them as domestic terrorist. That NSVA memo talked about domestic
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 1: terrorist in regard to people that are And I asked
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 1: about this language practice seeing harassment, intimidation and fear of violence.
• 1:01:07
  Speaker 1: Now you can't sign onto a memo that is done
• 1:01:14
  Speaker 1: in response to a letter and a complaint from a
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 1: special interest group that uses the domestic harrist activity term
• 1:01:25
  Speaker 1: and not be in agreement with that, And of course
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: then he's denying it because they say, well, the memo
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 1: did not use the word domestic terrorists. Wink, wink, nod nod.
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 1: You know, I remember after nine eleven, and you remember
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 1: US Attorney General John Ashcroft. John Ashcroft, who was dealing
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: with the worst haristack in US history, wasn't throwing around
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 1: memos as quickly when we were literally under attack from
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 1: al Qaeda as quickly as Garland was at parents because
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 1: of the Teachers Union in special interest groups saying decide
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: that they are we're going to treat them like terrorists
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: and tell me how to prosecute them, and send it
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 1: out a memo telling people how to prosecute them because
• 1:02:11
  Speaker 1: they decide to organize on Facebook. Even after nine to eleven,
• 1:02:16
  Speaker 1: you didn't see this type of reckless And if there
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 1: was any time that I would argue have reckless behavior
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: in a sense a paranoid, a freak out moment of
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 1: send out a memo, send out a memo, send out
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: a memo about these domestic terrorists in America, it would
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 1: have been after nine to eleven, And even the Attorney
• 1:02:31
  Speaker 1: General John Ascoff at the time didn't do it as
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: quickly as this guy is doing against parents going to
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: school board meetings. Well, you're right about that, and it
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: is a term that is a specific term. And to
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: a quite parent who are going to petition their government,
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 1: which is their right to exercise their free speech, which
• 1:02:58
  Speaker 1: is their right to hold accountable, they're elected officials, which
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: is their right. All of this is it's just hard
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 1: to even believe. I have never in my life seems
• 1:03:16
  Speaker 1: something like this, And wherever I go in our wonderful
• 1:03:19
  Speaker 1: state been this is one of the first things that
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: people talk about. How dare the DOJ try to have
• 1:03:28
  Speaker 1: parents that go to a school board to ask about
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: mask mandates, vaccine mandates, curriculum sixteen nineteen CRT, pornography in
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: the middle school library, and safety of children in school.
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 1: And now we're finding out not one but two rapes,
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: two have been covered up by school boards. And look
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: at the latest story center, look at the latest story.
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 1: And this is an example of what could happen to
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: a parent very quickly. You have a high school student
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 1: that's just broke this morning, that gave and I'm quoting
• 1:04:10
  Speaker 1: lap dances to staff, including the principle for the school's
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: man pageant. There's now an investigation underway because parents have organized, right,
• 1:04:21
  Speaker 1: and a student that was dressed in very little clothing
• 1:04:23
  Speaker 1: gave lap dances as staff members, including the principle at
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: a Kentucky public high school, while girls dressed as Hooters
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: waitresses during homecoming week activities Tuesday. This has all been
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 1: reported by the local news. The paper added that quote
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: an investigations underway to figure out what went down as
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 1: part of the Hazard High schools man pageant and costume day.
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 1: The paper said, parents organized. So my question for you
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 1: centers this, if parents organized against this school right for
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 1: allowing this happen, go to the school board and lose
• 1:04:56
  Speaker 1: their minds, or make phone calls to their school rep
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: presenters or the principal or the school itself, are they
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 1: going to be treated like domesitarists? Based on what I
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 1: understand from Garland yesterday, and you're questioning of him at
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: this point his memo, which has not been retracted, these
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 1: parents could still be prosecuted under more than a dozen
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 1: different ways as some sort of threat to society for
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 1: being angry that students were giving lap dance as a
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: staff and the principle of a school. That's right, And
• 1:05:28
  Speaker 1: you know I asked him several other committee members to
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 1: ask him if he planned to retract a memo because
• 1:05:35
  Speaker 1: the NSBA had come at their staff and the board
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 1: had retracted their memo to the White House. And he says, no,
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: they're not going to do it. But Ben, bear in mind,
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 1: what are they trying to do. They won't government control
• 1:05:54
  Speaker 1: of your kids, they're doing it through this memo. They
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: won't government control of your healthcare, which is this vaccine.
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: They want government control of your checking account and your income,
• 1:06:08
  Speaker 1: which they're doing through the taxes, prepaying taxes on money
• 1:06:13
  Speaker 1: you haven't made, and they're also doing it through surveilling
• 1:06:18
  Speaker 1: your checking account. It is cradle to grave, daylight to dark.
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 1: This is a bunch of socialists. They thought they were
• 1:06:27
  Speaker 1: going to radically transform this country for when Barack Obama
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 1: was president, and thank god we got Donald Trump and
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 1: they didn't get a third term of Barack Obama with
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. But now they are held bent on doing this.
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 1: They don't give a ripping flip about your children, about
• 1:06:48
  Speaker 1: your life, about your job. Anything. Once they want is
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: a socialist nation with them in control. And you're going
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 1: to be the asn't send the peons to give them
• 1:07:02
  Speaker 1: the lifestyle they want. At your expense. Last question, and
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 1: I'm going to switch gears here, but it's an important one.
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 1: There was a question asked the Attorney General from you
• 1:07:11
  Speaker 1: guys yesterday about doctor Fauci and is he being investigated
• 1:07:16
  Speaker 1: for lying to Congress? How did he answer that question? Well,
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: he is an uninvestigating doctor Fauci because he doesn't think
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: he lied to Congress. But there are plenty of us
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: who are looking at different components of what Fausci has done.
• 1:07:32
  Speaker 1: And of course I have been calling for a WU
• 1:07:35
  Speaker 1: on lab investigations in today one and I was joined
• 1:07:40
  Speaker 1: Ron Johnson and some other Rand Paul have joined me
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: in this call. Secretary Pompeo tried to do this. You
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: had career, career, your crats over as a state department
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 1: that blocked it. But you know what, the layers are
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: pealing back on this smelly onion. And what we're going
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 1: to do is continue to push. I think people have
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: about had it. They finally realize that what they got
• 1:08:15
  Speaker 1: with Joe Biden is not what they thought they were
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 1: going to get with Joe Biden. And people are very
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: fearful of what is happening to this country and how
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 1: quickly they are trying to from the inside overthrow this government. Senator,
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: I really appreciate you coming on, and I'll say this
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 1: again to everybody listening. I have been warning you as
• 1:08:41
  Speaker 1: parents for days now, not just days, weeks, months, that
• 1:08:45
  Speaker 1: you better start getting involved in the public schools in
• 1:08:49
  Speaker 1: your area. Whether your kids go to those public schools
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: or not, whether your grandkids go to those public schools
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 1: or not, whether you have kids or not, you are
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: paying for people to politically and die doctrinate these children
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 1: and fundamentally change the communities that you live in. And
• 1:09:05
  Speaker 1: you better hurry up, and you better get involved, because
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: these school boards are now fighting back. Now. I'm gonna
• 1:09:14
  Speaker 1: ask for your help today to make sure that as
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 1: many people as possible hear what we're going to give you.
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 1: We are going to go from the West coast to
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: the East coast, including a president of a school board
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 1: that actually said to a parent after they spoke out
• 1:09:29
  Speaker 1: about critical race theory and mass mandates FU and the
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 1: media is not covering it. I'm gonna play that for
• 1:09:35
  Speaker 1: you in a minute, but please right now make sure
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 1: that you share this podcast with your family, friends. If
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 1: you're listening for the first time, make sure you hit
• 1:09:44
  Speaker 1: that auto download button so you get the show every
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 1: day it's free, or subscribe button, whatever they call it, wherever,
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 1: whatever app you're listening to us on right now, so
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: that you'll get tomorrow's show as well. Now, Terry mccauliffe
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: is a great example of what happens when you allow
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 1: leaders to totally get out of hand. You look at
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 1: what he had to say about parents. He's made it
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 1: clear schools, no, parents shouldn't have a say so in
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 1: the schools. He's now trying to say he never said it.
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 1: We know he said it. He said it over and
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 1: over and over and over and over again. We know
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 1: that he said that parents should have no say so
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 1: in their kids' lives. This is a guy that constantly
• 1:10:29
  Speaker 1: smears the parents of an entire state, saying, shut up,
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 1: sit down, and we will be in charge of a
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 1: document in your kids. I am sick of them talking
• 1:10:37
  Speaker 1: about these issues of critical race theory. We do not
• 1:10:40
  Speaker 1: teach critical race theory here in Virginia. It has never
• 1:10:43
  Speaker 1: been taught. It is a racist dog whistle. It is
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: pitying parents against parents, parents against teachers, and they're using
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: our children as political bonds. And it has got to stop. Now,
• 1:10:53
  Speaker 1: that's a lie. They are teaching critical race theory in
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 1: Virginia and it's been proven that he's lying. Terry mccauliffe
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 1: went on TV started talking about these parents concerns and
• 1:11:04
  Speaker 1: these concerned parents are actually racists. But you know this
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: is junk and trying to stirrupt this critical race theory,
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: which I'll be honest with your Bill, I find highly offensive.
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 1: Critical race theory is not taught in Virginia. It has
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: never been taught. It is a racist dog whistle. Over
• 1:11:19
  Speaker 1: and over again. If you're a parent and you show up,
• 1:11:22
  Speaker 1: it's racist. It's not taught in Virginia. Folks, these concerned parents,
• 1:11:26
  Speaker 1: you're racist. That's what you are, every one of you.
• 1:11:29
  Speaker 1: You are a racist, flat out racist, if you show
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 1: up and you voice your concerns. Now, mcculoff has tried
• 1:11:44
  Speaker 1: to flip flop over and over again. His original quote was,
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to let parents come into schools and
• 1:11:49
  Speaker 1: actually take books out and take and make their own decisions.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: I don't think parents should be telling schools what they
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 1: should teach, he said down September twenty eighth of this year.
• 1:12:02
  Speaker 1: Now it's not just Terry Mcculloffe's kind of the front
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 1: runner of this. There's an election in what four days
• 1:12:08
  Speaker 1: with Terry mccullof's name on the ballot, and we're going
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 1: to see how parents respond. But there are many other
• 1:12:13
  Speaker 1: people out there that are doing exactly what Terry mcculloff
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 1: is doing. Let me go back to Jody Sapp. This
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 1: Minnesota school board is now prohibiting parents from criticizing school
• 1:12:25
  Speaker 1: officials and forces public commoners to reveal their home addresses
• 1:12:30
  Speaker 1: so they can be harassed and expose them to harassment,
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 1: property damage, and possibly be fired from their jobs because
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 1: they'll find out who their employers are. Here are the
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 1: new rules for parents at the Minnesota school Board, where
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 1: Jody Sapp sits as a school board member for the
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: public schools. It's want to remind everyone this is a
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: business meeting of the school board. It is not a
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 1: meeting that belongs to the public. Each speed is asked
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: to state his or her name and address for the record.
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 1: Failure to do so will result in an individual not
• 1:13:05
  Speaker 1: being allowed to speak. John, can you give us your
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 1: name and address please? My name is John Wickland. I
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 1: live in Mankato. Could I get your address please? John, Um,
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 1: I'd rather not since you guys don't You can't speak,
• 1:13:19
  Speaker 1: and I get so much property damage and eggs and
• 1:13:23
  Speaker 1: everything else from fun people and their friends. You need
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: to give your address, all right? Excuse me? I live
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 1: on fifth Street, house number. Do you hear that? I
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 1: love on fith Street? Thank you? All right? So are
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 1: our kids safe? Um? Effective tonight, the school board will
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: enforce the following guidelines. Open form participants are prohibited from
• 1:13:56
  Speaker 1: calling out or addressing any individual school board or school
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 1: the district's staff member. If this occurs, open forum will
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 1: be closed and the individual will not be allowed to
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 1: participate in future open forums. So you lose your right
• 1:14:10
  Speaker 1: to have an opinion of school board if you openly
• 1:14:13
  Speaker 1: expose what a school member is doing, an employee is
• 1:14:17
  Speaker 1: doing and or teaching in your kids classroom, or if
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 1: you criticize a school board member. If you do this,
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 1: you will no longer be allowed to speak in any
• 1:14:26
  Speaker 1: future open forms, So you lose your right to speak
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: at future forms. Not really an open forum if that's
• 1:14:32
  Speaker 1: what they're now going to do, So you can't criticize
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 1: me or any of us sitting up here, you peons,
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 1: you parents that are annoying us. We're trying to do
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 1: the business of indocting your children. We need your home
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 1: address so we can harass you before you can speak.
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 1: And if you violate one of our new random rules
• 1:14:51
  Speaker 1: that we have decided to implement tonight, you will no
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: longer be allowed to speak for the rest of your lives,
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 1: your kids, school board, or your district school board meeting.
• 1:15:03
  Speaker 1: Got it, Welcome to Minnesota or at school district staff member.
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: If this occurs, open forum will be closed and the
• 1:15:10
  Speaker 1: individual will not be allowed to participate in future open forums.
• 1:15:14
  Speaker 1: Crowd noise or any sort of grandstanding during open forum,
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: including applause, talking, hollering, or any obersts, will result an
• 1:15:23
  Speaker 1: open forum being closed. Further, beginning at the November first
• 1:15:28
  Speaker 1: school board meeting, open forum participation will be limited to
• 1:15:32
  Speaker 1: those individuals who wish to speak to an item on
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: the board agenda. The board agenda is always made available
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: the Thursday prior to our meetings, and they are always
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: on the district website. There you go, It's on the website,
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 1: so you better just shut up. Yeah, SAP, who previously
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 1: announced anyone who commented during the open forum was not
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 1: allowed to criticize members of the school board and the
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 1: meeting it's not a meeting that belongs to the public.
• 1:16:03
  Speaker 1: Now has said we're gonna take it a step further.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: You say anything we don't like, we'll shut it down.
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: You say anything you don't like, will ban you for life.
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: If any speaker violates the rule of them, the open
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: forum would be immediately closed for the rest of the meeting.
• 1:16:18
  Speaker 1: What does that mean. That means some woke liberal could
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: come in break a rule and they shut down the
• 1:16:22
  Speaker 1: open forum period so no parents could speak. And don't
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: think they're not going to do this every single meeting.
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: You could have a woke liberal. You could have a
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: member of the school's staff break one of the rules
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 1: on purpose, so that the open forum part of the
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: school board meeting would disappear every week before anyone else
• 1:16:41
  Speaker 1: is able to speak. You don't think woke liberals would
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 1: do that. You don't think they would do that on purpose.
• 1:16:49
  Speaker 1: They would definitely do this on purpose, because then they
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: don't have to deal with you. You could have the
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 1: same liberal every week come in or well, I know
• 1:16:56
  Speaker 1: and I forgot, you'd be banned for life. So you
• 1:16:59
  Speaker 1: find a different liberal. The next week, you find a
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: different liberal the next week. You find a different liberal
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: the next week, and then you just have them come
• 1:17:07
  Speaker 1: in and you have them break a rule, and immediately
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: when they break that rule, game over. We're done. Have
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: a great life, see you. That's what we will do.
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 1: Who says and what rule says a parent loses their
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 1: right to speak at a school board meeting. That's the
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 1: real question. I want to know, right who, seriously, who
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: gets to decide that you can't speak for the rest
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: of your life if you break one of their new rules,
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: one of their new random, arbitrary rules at that If
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 1: somebody could explain that part of democracy and freedom of speech.
• 1:17:50
  Speaker 1: If this was my kids school board, I would tell
• 1:17:53
  Speaker 1: every single parent to immediately pull their kid out. This
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: is why you gotta start, folks, This is why we
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: have to start running. We have to start finding great people.
• 1:18:06
  Speaker 1: Many of them, I would hope, are retirees who can
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 1: dedicate themselves to these jobs. I don't care if you
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: have kids or grandkids in these schools. If you care
• 1:18:14
  Speaker 1: about freedom, if you care about democracy, if you care
• 1:18:18
  Speaker 1: about making sure that our kids are not used as
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: political ponds to be indoctrinated to turn into tyrants, socialists,
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: and communists, then get off your rear end and start
• 1:18:28
  Speaker 1: running for office. There is, for far too long been
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 1: this idea, this mentality that you must have a kid
• 1:18:38
  Speaker 1: in the school system for you to be able to
• 1:18:40
  Speaker 1: run for offust That's not how it works. I actually
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 1: think it's a great platform to say, my kid doesn't
• 1:18:46
  Speaker 1: go to our schools because they suck, but I'm going
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 1: to help fix them and I want to get them
• 1:18:51
  Speaker 1: back to the point where I can put my kid
• 1:18:52
  Speaker 1: in my public schools. That for me, is a platform
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: to run off of. That's a real platform in my opinion,
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 1: and people should do it. Grandparents should do it saying
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: you know what, I see what's happening in this country,
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: and we're not educating kids anymore. We're indoctrinating kids. And
• 1:19:07
  Speaker 1: I'm going to stand up and I'm going to fight
• 1:19:09
  Speaker 1: back and I'm going to say no, that is what
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 1: should happen. That would be amazing because if we don't
• 1:19:17
  Speaker 1: do it soon, this isn't what they're going to do
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: to shut every one of you down. And the thing is,
• 1:19:22
  Speaker 1: we actually have all the power, even though we're acting
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: like we don't. It's an abusive relationship our school boards
• 1:19:29
  Speaker 1: and what they are doing right now is nothing more
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 1: than an abusive relationship where they have decided that they
• 1:19:34
  Speaker 1: can dictate to all of your children what to believe,
• 1:19:37
  Speaker 1: and you, as parents, you will not have a say
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: so in it, and you better shut the hell up.
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: I go back to what Terry mccalluff said. He is
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: saying out loud what every other school board members sent thinking.
• 1:19:48
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to let parents come to schools and
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 1: actually take books out and take and make their own decisions.
• 1:19:53
  Speaker 1: I don't think parents should be telling schools what they
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 1: should teach. I believe that we're the big government. We
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: get to decide what your kids believe, and we will
• 1:20:01
  Speaker 1: indoctrinate them. That is what is being said. There's another
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 1: aspect of taking away a parents' rights to sound off
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: to speak at a school board meeting. There's a reason why.
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 1: Part of it is because not only can they indoctrinate
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: your child and they believe that your children are property
• 1:20:24
  Speaker 1: of the state, but if you're not involved in the curriculum,
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: they get to make money and they get to line
• 1:20:31
  Speaker 1: the pockets of their family and friends that are in
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: the business. You got to follow the money on this one.
• 1:20:38
  Speaker 1: Now you may be listening to me and saying, Ben,
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: that's absurd. That's not happening. Oh it is. It's happening
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: at the highest levels, and I can prove it. Center
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: Ted Cruz got some information, investigate that information and found
• 1:20:56
  Speaker 1: out that the man who's in charge of the Justice Apartment,
• 1:21:00
  Speaker 1: the Attorney General Garland, has a vested interest in parents
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 1: not having a say so in their kids' education. He
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 1: has a vested interest in making sure that you don't
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 1: change curriculum, especially when it comes to critical race theory. Garland,
• 1:21:19
  Speaker 1: the Attorney General the United States of America, the same
• 1:21:21
  Speaker 1: man that has allowed for this memorandum of thirteen different
• 1:21:24
  Speaker 1: ways to arrest you and treat you like a domestic
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 1: teris as a parent if you show up to a
• 1:21:28
  Speaker 1: school board meeting, has a vested interest that could be
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: in the millions, tens of millions of dollars, maybe even more.
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 1: Why because his daughter and son in law, that's how
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: they make their living off of curriculum that teaches critical
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 1: race theory. You want to know why Garland wants to
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 1: shut you up as a parent. This is exactly why
• 1:21:54
  Speaker 1: Family It is poised to make millions and millions of
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 1: dollars off of curriculum that one doctrinate your kid on
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: critical race theory, that will teach the white kids to
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: be ashamed of themselves and of this country, and that
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 1: there needs to be some leveling of the playing field
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: because of the color of your skin. They want to
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 1: teach your kids that you should apologize for being white.
• 1:22:21
  Speaker 1: They may not even believe this, but there's money to
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: be made in wokeism. How much money we don't know.
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: How do we not know because Garland is hiding it.
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 1: I want you to hear this back and forth between
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 1: Ted Cruz and the Attorney General after he punches back
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: for the first time, exposing the Attorney generally nined States America,
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: the same guy that says you're a domestic terrorist for
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 1: going to your kids schoolboard meeting and opposing the teaching
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 1: of things like critical race theory. And it all goes
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: back to the money. A big part of this letter
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 1: is that they're upset about parents not one in critical
• 1:23:01
  Speaker 1: race theory taught. Your son in law makes a very
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: substantial sum of money from a company involved in the
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: teaching of critical race theory. Did you seek and receive
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: a decision from an ethics advisors the Department of Justice
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: before you carried out an action that would have a
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 1: predictable financial benefit to your son in law. This memorandum
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: is aimed at violence and threats. I just asked a question,
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: did you did you seek an ethics opinion? By the way,
• 1:23:34
  Speaker 1: I want you to understand why Garland's not answered this
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 1: question for one or one of two reasons. Number one,
• 1:23:41
  Speaker 1: he did seek an ethics opinion, and the opinion came
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: back and clearly said don't do this. That could be
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 1: option one. It says don't do it, And the reason
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 1: why you shouldn't do it is because you have a
• 1:23:55
  Speaker 1: vested interest in critical race theory being taught, and your
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 1: family is going to make millions of dollars. So don't
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 1: lock up parents, don't silence parents, don't treat parents like
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 1: domestic terrorists just so your family can make millions of
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 1: dollars off of teaching critical race theory. Because the memo
• 1:24:16
  Speaker 1: that his Department of Justice put out to treat you
• 1:24:19
  Speaker 1: like get terrorists specifically cites the issue of parents showing
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: up and being angry about the teaching of critical race theory.
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: Wonder why they deliberately and purposely put those words on
• 1:24:31
  Speaker 1: the list. Maybe it is because of Garland, Maybe it
• 1:24:35
  Speaker 1: is because of his family is going to make a
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 1: crap ton of money teaching and in doctoring your kids
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 1: on this propaganda and is nothing but propaganda. That's why
• 1:24:47
  Speaker 1: I want to answer the question. It has no Prodid
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: you seek an ethics opinion? Judge, you know how to
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 1: ask questions and answer them. Did you seek an ethics opinion?
• 1:24:54
  Speaker 1: You ask me whether I sought an ethics opinion about
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: something that would have a predictable effect on something. This
• 1:25:00
  Speaker 1: has no predictable effect in the way that you're talking about. So,
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 1: if critical race theory is taught in more schools, does
• 1:25:05
  Speaker 1: your son in law make more money? Has nothing? If
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: critical race theory is taught in more schools, does your
• 1:25:09
  Speaker 1: son in law make more money? Yes? Or no? This
• 1:25:11
  Speaker 1: memorandum has nothing to do with critical race. Will you
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: answer I kind of curriculum? Will you answer if you
• 1:25:17
  Speaker 1: saw I am answering the best I can? Yes or no?
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 1: Did you seek an ethics opinion this memorandum has Did
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 1: you seek an ethics opinion? This memorandum has nothing to
• 1:25:26
  Speaker 1: do with general Are you refusing to answer if you
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: sought an ethics and telling you that there's no possible
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 1: because so you're saying no, just answer it directly, you
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 1: know how an answer question directly? Did you seek an
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 1: ethics opinion? I'm telling you that if I thought there
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: was any reason to believe there was a conflict of interest,
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 1: I would do that. But I cannot. Why do you
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 1: refuse to answer the question. Why won't you just say no?
• 1:25:49
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you're not going to answer the question. I'm sorry,
• 1:25:52
  Speaker 1: asked the question again? Did you seek an ethics opinion?
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 1: I'm saying again I would seek an ethics opinion in it.
• 1:25:59
  Speaker 1: So no is the answer? It an your time is
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: up that the record reflect the Attorney General refuses to
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 1: answer whether he thought sought an ethics opinion, and apparently
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 1: ethics are not a terribly high priority in the Biden
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 1: Justice Department. What this is why you weaponize the DOJ.
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 1: This is why, folks, This is this is the this
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 1: is the ball game. You're the Attorney General's daughter and
• 1:26:25
  Speaker 1: son in law. You're making money selling critical race theory
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 1: propaganda to the schools as a quote curriculum. You are
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 1: making an unknown large sums of money right now off
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: of this, and the business is growing, not getting smaller
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: as more and more woke school boards started in doctrinating
• 1:26:45
  Speaker 1: your children with critical race theory pairings. Start showing up,
• 1:26:49
  Speaker 1: they start voicing their concerns, and now we just turn
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: them into domestic terrorists. That'll shut them up. So all
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: you gotta do, folks, just tournament into domestic terrorists. Game
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: on or game over. Treat them like the nine to
• 1:27:05
  Speaker 1: eleven hijackers. Treat them like those that help the nine
• 1:27:09
  Speaker 1: eleven hijackers do what they did on nine to eleven.
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 1: Treat them the exact same way. Under the law, in fact,
• 1:27:14
  Speaker 1: give thirteen different ways to prosecute parents that show up
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 1: and voice their concerns over critical race seri and other
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 1: things like it. That's all you gotta do. Knock that out, folks,
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: let's go. You do this game over. Parents will be
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: so afraid to show up, they'll be so afraid of
• 1:27:36
  Speaker 1: going to jail, they'll be so afraid of being convicted
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 1: as a felon. That will just control them. Terry McColl
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 1: have said it best. Right, parents have no right to
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: show up and tell us what to do. Washington Post. Right,
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 1: there's the article, Washington Post, the most brilliant minds we
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 1: can find. Are telling you that is flawed logic for you,
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 1: as a parent to think, while you're paying for your
• 1:27:56
  Speaker 1: kids education, that you should actually have a say so
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 1: in your kids education. They're actually telling you it's almost
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 1: like against the law. If you read the article, if
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 1: you want to know what school boards are saying to
• 1:28:09
  Speaker 1: parents around the country, well, I already played for the
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 1: Minnesota school board prohibiting parents from criticizing individual school officials
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 1: and or teachers, also demanding that they revealed their home addresses,
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 1: exposed them to harassment and property damage just to speak
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 1: at a school board meeting. That's not all that's happening
• 1:28:28
  Speaker 1: in this country. In California, Oh, they've got something to
• 1:28:32
  Speaker 1: say to you. There was a parent, a parent that
• 1:28:36
  Speaker 1: spoke out about vaccines and mass mandates in California, Los
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 1: Alamitos School District. They spoke, They were very kind, they
• 1:28:45
  Speaker 1: were very polite. The audience clapped. The president of the
• 1:28:49
  Speaker 1: school board had this to say to that parent. It
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 1: was by accent. She didn't realize her mic was hot.
• 1:28:55
  Speaker 1: She thought it was off. She thought it was off folks.
• 1:28:59
  Speaker 1: She didn't know that people were going to actually hear her.
• 1:29:03
  Speaker 1: And what she had to say, Yeah, you want to
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 1: know what she said, F you. She said the whole word.
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 1: A parent spoke out against her children and mass mandates
• 1:29:18
  Speaker 1: and vaccine mandates and did in a very respectful way.
• 1:29:21
  Speaker 1: And the president of the school board actually said out loud,
• 1:29:24
  Speaker 1: not knowing her mike was still on, F you to
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: the parent. You tell parents after they speak out about
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: their kids, and you're the president of the school board,
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 1: literally F you. It gets caught on tape, I think
• 1:29:46
  Speaker 1: that person loses their job. No, why would we do that?
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: Why would that person get fired for that? It's no way.
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 1: I know that she's the president of the California School Board,
• 1:29:57
  Speaker 1: and I know she was caught on a hot mike
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 1: yelling at a concerned parent, F you. But all you
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 1: gotta do is just put out an apology. You want
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 1: to know what the mom said which allowed for her
• 1:30:09
  Speaker 1: or made her go unhinged and say out loud, FU
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 1: to the parent. The parents were voicing their concerns at
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 1: the board meeting, including a mother named Lauren. She walked
• 1:30:23
  Speaker 1: at the mic and she said, my name is Lauren,
• 1:30:26
  Speaker 1: and I'm here as a concerned parent to urge you
• 1:30:28
  Speaker 1: to be the first school to say no to mandates
• 1:30:32
  Speaker 1: for our children. It should be up to every parent.
• 1:30:35
  Speaker 1: The mother then said, to make that decision. I urge
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: you to say no, no to mandates for our children.
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 1: That drew applause from the other parents in the audience.
• 1:30:50
  Speaker 1: She went on to say, what side of history are
• 1:30:52
  Speaker 1: you willing to participate? Leave our children alone, Let them
• 1:30:57
  Speaker 1: be kids and enjoy one another, at them, breathe again
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: and smile again, referring to what the mass takeaway. We
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 1: are vocal because we are our children's biggest advocates. That's
• 1:31:12
  Speaker 1: when the board president Davison told the mother that her
• 1:31:17
  Speaker 1: time was up and called on the next parent to speak.
• 1:31:20
  Speaker 1: The mother left the podium. You hear the clapping, and
• 1:31:24
  Speaker 1: that president of the school board, that woman Davison, didn't
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: realize her microphone was still on when she said, and
• 1:31:32
  Speaker 1: this tells you how much they hate you. They have
• 1:31:35
  Speaker 1: nothing but pure, pure hatred for you. You think they're
• 1:31:40
  Speaker 1: gonna listen to your suggestions? If this had to respond
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: to a kind mother talking about her children. Yeah, there
• 1:31:50
  Speaker 1: it is. Now we've got an official response, so everything's
• 1:31:52
  Speaker 1: gonna be okay, Right, Yeah, we've got that response. Davison
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 1: issued an apology for cursing at the concerned parent quote.
• 1:32:01
  Speaker 1: I am deeply sorry for the inappropriate comment that I
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 1: made in last night's board meeting. I am going to
• 1:32:06
  Speaker 1: personally apologize the speaker, who most certainly deserves to know
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 1: that when members of the public address the Board of Education,
• 1:32:14
  Speaker 1: they must be heard with respect. Well, that's a lie.
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 1: These are trying times, but trying times the man that
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: we rise to do our best. I reaffirm my commitment
• 1:32:26
  Speaker 1: to serve our community with dignity and integrity. That's a lie,
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: and I hope they will accept my sincere apology. The mother,
• 1:32:34
  Speaker 1: by the way, did not accept the school board's presence apology,
• 1:32:39
  Speaker 1: so the local news there she did not think the
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 1: apology was sincere wasn't sincere at all. Luckily KTLA not
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 1: exactly conservative, a liberal local news station in LA. Because
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 1: of the outrage of the community of a parent being
• 1:33:00
  Speaker 1: told literally FU for showing up and saying, in a
• 1:33:05
  Speaker 1: very kind manner, please let me decide what's best or
• 1:33:09
  Speaker 1: my kid. Please don't mandate things on my children, they
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: had to actually cover the story. They had no choice.
• 1:33:18
  Speaker 1: There was too much outrage in the community. Take a listen. Yeah,
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 1: there are calls for the Los Alamidos Unified school Board
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 1: president to resign after a hot mic captured a disparaging
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 1: comment she made against a parent. It happened during yesterday's
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 1: school board meeting. The school board president was talking about
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 1: a parent who opposed a vaccine mandate and knew at
• 1:33:43
  Speaker 1: six KTLA Orange County Bureau Chief Chip Yost is speaking
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: with that parent. He joins his life from Los Alimidos.
• 1:33:49
  Speaker 1: With the woman's reaction, Chip, Yeah, Hey, they're Mica and Cherry. Yeah.
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 1: That school board president now apologizing after a comment of
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 1: hers was caught on a hot mic at a meeting
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 1: here yesterday. And as you said, knew at six we're
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 1: also now hearing from the parent that comment was directed at.
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 1: You talk about all these maskers and all of these
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 1: people that got vaccines like it's such a good thing
• 1:34:15
  Speaker 1: to do. They've shot themselves in the foot. Like many
• 1:34:19
  Speaker 1: school board meetings around the country recently, Tuesday's meeting of
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: the Lows Alimidos Unified school Board was tense and sometimes pointed,
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 1: I will never trust this district until you guys are replaced,
• 1:34:32
  Speaker 1: Like this protest outside the board's chambers earlier this year,
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 1: some speakers at Tuesday's meeting vented their frustration not only
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: over critical race theory, but also over mask mandates and
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: COVID vaccines as well. So I am man dates on masks,
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 1: no on vaccines, and no on CRTs all these I'm
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 1: sorry our Earlier in the meeting, board member Scott Fayette
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: said this about some of the criticism named at him
• 1:35:01
  Speaker 1: over mask mandates and vaccines. This is a state mandate.
• 1:35:06
  Speaker 1: Both of these policies come from the state. Your influence
• 1:35:13
  Speaker 1: is the same that I have. We are coming out
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: of COVID, We're coming out of a once in a
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 1: lifetime pandemic, and instead of pulling together and putting the
• 1:35:25
  Speaker 1: children first, there's a group of people that are putting
• 1:35:29
  Speaker 1: themselves first. Later after this speaker addressed Fayette directly, that
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 1: was very rudy to say your parents are selfish. Someone
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: on an open mic could be heard with what sounded
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: like a profane two word retort. Yeah. Board president Marlis
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 1: Davidson has admitted that she was the one who made
• 1:35:53
  Speaker 1: that comment and gave us this statement saying, I am
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: deeply sorry for the inappropriate comment that I made in
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 1: last night's board meeting. I am going to personally apologize
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: to the speaker, who most certainly deserves to know that
• 1:36:04
  Speaker 1: when the members of the public addressed the Board of Education,
• 1:36:07
  Speaker 1: they must be heard with respect. These are trying times,
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 1: but trying times demand that we rise to do our best.
• 1:36:13
  Speaker 1: I reaffirm my commitment to serve our community with dignity
• 1:36:16
  Speaker 1: and integrity, and I hope they will accept my sincere apology.
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 1: On that note, we did speak to the parent the
• 1:36:23
  Speaker 1: comment was directed at, and she said she does not
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 1: think the apology was sincere. I do love this, I
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: really do. I love the lies here. I love the
• 1:36:35
  Speaker 1: lies coming from this school. By the way, there's no
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 1: way that she wrote this those comments. No way, no
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 1: way that that school board president wrote her canned response.
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 1: I rededicate my commitment to parents. You hate parents, You
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 1: literally said to a parents, not even like like yeah,
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: there's so many different levels of things that you could
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: say to a parent off the cuff, like the people
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 1: are crazy, people are blanking nuts, right, There's a lot
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 1: of things that you could say there really are. There
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 1: are a lot of different things that you could say
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 1: when you look at a parent and you say to them,
• 1:37:20
  Speaker 1: blank you blank you blank you you want me to
• 1:37:28
  Speaker 1: believe you had any commitment to parents, to know you
• 1:37:30
  Speaker 1: hate parents. You want them to go home and shut up.
• 1:37:34
  Speaker 1: You want to indoctrinate these kids with your propaganda. That's
• 1:37:38
  Speaker 1: what you want to do. That mother, by the way,
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 1: who was told to blank you, here's how she responded
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 1: to the comments True Color Show last night. There's no
• 1:37:50
  Speaker 1: taking that back. She needs to step down. That's why
• 1:37:55
  Speaker 1: the board members are being recalled is because they're not
• 1:37:59
  Speaker 1: listening to the parents. Remember, they don't think they have
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 1: to listen to you. That's why the Department of Justice,
• 1:38:07
  Speaker 1: that's why Garland, that's why the FBI, that's why the
• 1:38:10
  Speaker 1: Biden administration are treating parents that speak up like they
• 1:38:13
  Speaker 1: are domestic terrorists, not treating them like they're saying you're
• 1:38:17
  Speaker 1: a domestic terrorist. Most people that run for school boards,
• 1:38:23
  Speaker 1: just so you know, don't give a crap about kids.
• 1:38:26
  Speaker 1: It's a political power grap Go look at how many
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 1: people run for office for Congress, for Senate, for governor,
• 1:38:34
  Speaker 1: state center, state rep. And where do they start out
• 1:38:36
  Speaker 1: county commission, city council, mayor. They start on the school boards.
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 1: It's a stepping stone. The majority of these people, they
• 1:38:42
  Speaker 1: could give two rats. Rear ends about the kids. It's
• 1:38:46
  Speaker 1: the first and one of the easiest ways to get
• 1:38:48
  Speaker 1: elected because people don't pay attention. There are too many
• 1:38:51
  Speaker 1: people that don't pay attention to what's going on in
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 1: their school boards. And the reason why they don't pay
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 1: attention is because they're kids aren't in the schools, or
• 1:39:01
  Speaker 1: their kids have graduated from the schools, or they're just
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 1: too tired or lazy to pay attention. And I'm telling
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 1: you right now, you better start you want to get back.
• 1:39:12
  Speaker 1: I hear people all the time talk about I donate
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 1: my time to charity. You want to donate your time?
• 1:39:17
  Speaker 1: Run for school board. I don't care if you have kids.
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 1: If you do or don't have kids, it doesn't matter
• 1:39:23
  Speaker 1: to me. It doesn't matter run because all these other
• 1:39:31
  Speaker 1: scumbags are running. Some of them are psychopaths and just
• 1:39:33
  Speaker 1: want to in doctrinate your kids, but many of them
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 1: are just hardcore woke liberals who are using this to
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 1: get their name out there. I'm an elected official, I'm
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: a school board member, which makes it seem like, oh,
• 1:39:45
  Speaker 1: what makes you know? Of course I should want to
• 1:39:47
  Speaker 1: vote for them right for their next job that they want.
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: It's a stepping stone job for them. It's a political
• 1:39:55
  Speaker 1: ladder from them. People all the time like, well, I
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 1: think I think I want to be in politics. I'm
• 1:39:59
  Speaker 1: going to run the school board. They don't care about
• 1:40:01
  Speaker 1: your kid. This president's school board. I guarantees she has
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 1: other ideas for a career. And think about how arrogant
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 1: you have to be to look at a parent thinking
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: your mic is off and you actually say aloud FU.
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 1: I hope every one of you will take everything I
• 1:40:18
  Speaker 1: gave you today and share it. I hope every one
• 1:40:21
  Speaker 1: of you will please share this podcast. Write us a
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: review wherever you're listening to this podcast, because that helps
• 1:40:27
  Speaker 1: us tremendously. In the podcast charts, make sure you hit
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: the subscribe BUTTONET it's free, or auto download BUTTONET it's free.
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 1: You can listen to show every day for free. And
• 1:40:38
  Speaker 1: I'll see you back here tomorrow