Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Trump Strikes Pay Dirt w $750 Billion Energy Deal w EU in Landmark Agreement

Transcript

Trump Strikes Pay Dirt w $750 Billion Energy Deal w EU in Landmark Agreement · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump reaches a historic trade deal with the European Union.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: Europe is going to buy seven hundred and fifty billion,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: we're now being told.
• 0:13
  Speaker 2: In US energy. This is massive.
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: President Trump announcing the sweeping trade agreement with the European
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: Union on Sunday, setting a baseline fifteen percent tariff on
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: European imports, including automobiles, while keeping existing fifty percent duties
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: on steel and aluminum in place. Now, as part of
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: the deal, the EU committed to purchasing seven hundred and
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: fifty billion in US energy production. Trump announcing the agreement
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: during a press conference with the European Commission president after
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: a private meeting at the Trump Turnberry golf.
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: Course in Scotland.
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: Here is part of what was said by the President
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: of United States of America at that event, where.
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: They say, we've reached a deal.
• 1:03
  Speaker 3: So we're going to do the following. The European Union
• 1:08
  Speaker 3: is going to agree to purchase from the United States
• 1:15
  Speaker 3: seven hundred and fifty billion.
• 1:17
  Speaker 4: Dollars worth of energy.
• 1:19
  Speaker 3: Seven hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of energy. They
• 1:24
  Speaker 3: are going to agree to invest into the United States
• 1:30
  Speaker 3: six hundred billion dollars more than they're investing already, so
• 1:35
  Speaker 3: they're investing a large amount of money.
• 1:39
  Speaker 4: You know what that amount of money.
• 1:41
  Speaker 3: Is, it's very substantial, but they're going to invest an
• 1:44
  Speaker 3: additional six hundred billion dollars.
• 1:48
  Speaker 4: They're agreeing to.
• 1:50
  Speaker 3: Open up their countries to trade at zero tariff, so
• 1:56
  Speaker 3: that's a very big factor opening up their countries. All
• 2:00
  Speaker 3: of the countries will be opened up to trade with
• 2:02
  Speaker 3: the United States at zero traff and they're agreeing to
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: purchase a vast amount of military equipment. We don't know
• 2:10
  Speaker 3: what that number is, but it's The good news is
• 2:13
  Speaker 3: we make the best military equipment in the world, so
• 2:16
  Speaker 3: sort of you have to do that until somebody tops us,
• 2:19
  Speaker 3: which is not.
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: Going to happen.
• 2:20
  Speaker 3: We're way ahead of every other country in terms of
• 2:23
  Speaker 3: the quality of the military equipment. You saw that recently
• 2:26
  Speaker 3: in Iran, and you see that unfortunately, you see that
• 2:30
  Speaker 3: often for.
• 2:32
  Speaker 4: All the wrong reasons.
• 2:33
  Speaker 3: Right, So those things are seven hundred and fifty billion,
• 2:38
  Speaker 3: six hundred billion. Opening up the country. We are agreeing
• 2:45
  Speaker 3: that the tariff straight across for automobiles and everything else
• 2:52
  Speaker 3: will be a straight across tariff of fifteen percent. So
• 2:56
  Speaker 3: we have a tariff of fifteen percent we have the
• 3:00
  Speaker 3: opening up of all of the European countries, which I
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: think I could.
• 3:05
  Speaker 4: Say we're essentially closed.
• 3:06
  Speaker 3: I mean, you weren't exactly taking our orders, you weren't
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: exactly taking our agriculture, and then you would have smaller things.
• 3:14
  Speaker 4: But for the most part, it was closed. And now
• 3:17
  Speaker 4: it's open.
• 3:19
  Speaker 3: It's open for our companies to go in and do
• 3:21
  Speaker 3: a good job with it. I think you'll like them.
• 3:23
  Speaker 3: I think you'll like it, and we will. Very importantly.
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: They'll be investing a lot of money. But the military
• 3:30
  Speaker 3: is a big number, but that's one number. We're not
• 3:32
  Speaker 3: determining it's going to be whatever it is, but they're
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: going to be purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars.
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: Worth of military equipment.
• 3:40
  Speaker 4: There very important.
• 3:42
  Speaker 3: That they're going to purchase seven hundred and fifty seven
• 3:46
  Speaker 3: hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of energy, so that's
• 3:50
  Speaker 3: going to be great, and six hundred billion dollars worth
• 3:54
  Speaker 3: of investments into the United States over and above what
• 3:58
  Speaker 3: they have, and I think that basically concludes the deal.
• 4:02
  Speaker 3: I mean, those are the main factors. I don't think
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: there are too many other factors other than we're going
• 4:07
  Speaker 3: to get along great, and we have a great relationship
• 4:11
  Speaker 3: now with NATO, which is largely the same I mean
• 4:14
  Speaker 3: not exactly but pretty close right largely, and with NATO,
• 4:19
  Speaker 3: as you know, they're going up to five percent from
• 4:21
  Speaker 3: two percent, and the relationship is very strong with NATO.
• 4:27
  Speaker 3: So I just want to congratulate you.
• 4:28
  Speaker 4: I think it's I think it's.
• 4:31
  Speaker 3: Great that we made a deal today instead of playing
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: games and maybe not making a deal at all. I
• 4:36
  Speaker 3: think it's I'm going to let you say, but I
• 4:39
  Speaker 3: think it's the biggest deal ever made.
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: Thank you very much, Graduation.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: This is happening live in Turnberry, Scotland at the Trump
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: Club there announcing this landmark deal. Now, the EU will
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: purchase three quarters of a trillion dollars in US energy
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: well also investing six hundred billion into America on top
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: of his existing investments. Additionally, the EU countries will be
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: setting tariffs on US goods and this is massive at
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: zero percent, and Europe agreed to purchase a vast amount
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: of military equipment as well, saying quote, we don't know
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: what the number is, but went on to note the
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: purchase of the military equipment would be in the hundreds
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: of billions of dollars. Moreover, the EU will pay a
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: fifteen percent tariff rate to import products into the US,
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: ranging from automobiles and other goods. Now, look, they had
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: virtually shut off much of Europe to our automobiles and
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: to our agriculture, beef, pork.
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: Chick in.
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: The list goes on and on. So the President saying there, quote,
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: so we have a so we have a tariff of
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: fifteen percent. We have the opening up of all of
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: the European countries, which I think I would say, we're
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: essentially closed. I mean, you weren't exactly taking our orders,
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: you weren't exactly taking our agriculture, and and you would
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: have smaller things. But for the most part, it was closed.
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: And now it's open. So what does that mean for
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: American businesses? Well, number one, this is going to be
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: huge because American businesses are going to be able to
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: now actually have the ability to get into these markets
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: that we've been virtually shut out of completely. The auto
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: industry is a great example of that, where American cars
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: were just unfortunately not making its way into the European
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: markets in any significant way.
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: That is a big problem.
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: It was unfair because we were allowing their automobiles into
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: this country. And this goes back to the Donald Trump promise.
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: He promised he was going to get us into these markets.
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: He promised that we was going to get us into
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: these markets so it would be fair for American workers
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: and American manufacturing. And that is exactly what just happened.
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: You have a present that made good on that promise.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: It was a simple promise. It was one about being
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: about fairness. That's the simplest way I can describe it
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: is the President wanted it to be fair. The President
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: wanted it not only to be fair, but he wanted
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: to make sure that American workers were not left behind.
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: American manufacturing was at a disadvantage and we were importing
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: a significant amount of goods from European countries. This is massive.
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: Congratulations to the President of the United States America for
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: mania manufacturing American workers. This is huge anyway you look
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: at it, well done. All right, I want to take
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: a moment talk about the economy. You've been seeing what's
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: happening on Wall Street. You've seen what's been happening with
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: interest rates, and you've probably seen gold prices hitting all
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: time record highs. Why because there is uncertainty all over
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: the world right now, and when there is uncertain times
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: you want real answers about your financial stability, Well it
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: Kurt Elliot Precious Metals. You get more than gold and silver.
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: You get trusted guidance from a team that puts people
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: first always. You also get transparency. This is why I
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: recommend them. Their mission is clear. They want to help
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: you protect what matters most with real metals, real service,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: and real clarity. Now here's why I love what they
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: do at kirk Elliott Precious Metals number one bullyon only approach.
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: They focus on investment grade metals, not overpriced quote collectibles
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: or gimmick products that cost you an insane amount of
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: money for what you're actually getting. What they do is
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: they sell you more metal for your money and fair
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: value when it's time for you to actually sell. They
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: also have upfront transparent pricing just eight percent when you
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: buy and zero commissions when you go to sell. There
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: are no hidden fees on top of that. Ever, that
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: is the reason why I reckon amend them. They also
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: make sure they give you personalized guidance for you. You're never
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: just a number, no pressure, always real answers and they
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: make sure that you are in control. So if you're
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: ready for real, honest clarity and all of the BS
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: taken out, visit k e PM dot com slash ben
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: that's k e PM dot com slash ben to schedule
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: your personal portfolio review. Ask about today's unique market window
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: and how the current silver to gold ratio might work
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: in your favor. Protect what matters, plan with clarity k
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: e PM dot com slash ben or seven two zero
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: six oh five thirty nine hundred. That's seven two zero
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: six oh five thirty nine hundred. Kurt Elliott Precious Metals
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: Smarter Metal Investing starts with them. There's another major story
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: that is happening and the media is not covering it.
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: Senator rand Paul is now signaling very clearly that Jill Biden,
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: the former First Lady of the United States of America,
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: the wife of former President Joe Biden, as well as
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: Anthony Fauci, you remember the COVID guy, they could be
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: looked at in the Auto pen probe. Senator Paul saying
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: that the former First Lady, Joe Biden, and Anthony Fauci
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: absolutely could be examined during the Congress's autopen examination President
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: Trump has railed against his predecessor, the former President Biden,
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: for using the art autopen to pardon individuals during his
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: last few months in office. The President ordered a probe
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: into the signatures on various pardons in June, while GOP
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: lawmakers requested interviews now with several former White House staffers,
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: including the former first ladies and the president's doctor who
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: pled the fifth. They've now also gone to staffers to
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: testify and guess.
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: What they pleaded the fifth as well.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: All of this playing out before the House Oversight and
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: Government Reform Committee. Even though Anthony Fauci has been pardoned,
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: there is some question whether it's a legitimate pardon. His
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: pardon was not signed by President Biden. That's what Senator
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: Paul said in a statement. It's unclear quote whether President
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: Biden is mentally cognitive enough of the situation to know
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: even who he pardoned. Hundreds and hundreds of people were
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: pardoned in a day by a mechanical signature from a machine.
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: We do know there's been testimony from the people running
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: the machine that they never talked to the president, and
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: that they talked to an assistant that works for the
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: President's wife, that is where the first lady comes in now.
• 11:57
  Speaker 2: Biden had previously argued that.
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: Past administrations have used the autopendicign government paperwork, proving its legality. However,
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: Republicans have well refused to let go of the criticism
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: regarding his signature on multiple pardons that he may not
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: have known about, meaning they would be in theory no
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: and void. Who knew we weren't being led by Joe
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: Biden but were being run by some kind of chief
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: of staff, some chief of staff that worked for his wife.
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: That's something to a lot of Americans to know. They
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: want to know who was the person that was granting
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: power of pardons, who was the person that could have
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: taken the country to war, who was the person that
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: was never elected?
• 12:45
  Speaker 2: Senator Paul went on to say, adding.
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: Quote, so I think the way the best way to
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: sort this out is you have to go to court.
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: And I think the easiest way to get this into
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: court is is they should indicate.
• 13:00
  Speaker 2: What's gonna happen next.
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: They should indict, for example, Anthony Fauci for lying to Congress,
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: and he will make a defense that he's been pardon
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: That's what again, the senator said today. Senator Paul also
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: pointed out that the autopen was not used to sign
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: the pardon for Hunter Biden. We know that Hunter Biden's
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: pardon was signed directly by the President of the United
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: States of America. He went on to say, quote, I
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: think there is a question whether these pardons are even valid.
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: Interestingly enough, when he had to pardon his son, he
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: didn't take any chances.
• 13:33
  Speaker 2: By running it through the auto pen.
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: The pardon f Rountter Biden for any crimes committed over
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: the last decade. Any crimes was done by personal hand
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: signature by Joe Biden himself, and not by the auto pen.
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: So if you look at this story, there's two major
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: questions that everyone should be asking. Number one, why not
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: indict a guy like Anthony Fauci for line to Congress
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: and see if he uses the I've been pardoned in
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: court argument? And then it brings up the big question,
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: does an auto pen signature that the President may not
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: have known about does it actually count?
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: In fact?
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: How many different And this is an even bigger question.
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: Pardons came through the White House that the President had
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: no clue even happened. These are the real questions that
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: the American people deserve answers to and the President obviously
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: making it clear that he's willing to get to the
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: bottom of it to make sure it was done the
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: right way.
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: I got to ask you a question.
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: Are you one of those that is just so tired
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: of giving your money to radical left woke companies that
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: actually are fighting against your values every day?
• 14:51
  Speaker 2: Well, there are certain bills that you pay.
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: Every month that if you can go with a conservative company,
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: why not do it?
• 14:58
  Speaker 2: In fact, why not go.
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: With a conservative company that actually takes part of your
• 15:02
  Speaker 1: bill every month that you're going to pay to somebody,
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: and they give it back to organizations that support your
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: First and your Second Amendment rights, that support the rights
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: of unborn children, that stand with our military, are first responders,
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: and so many wounded warriors that need help. Well, that
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: bill I'm talking about is your cell phone bill. And
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: I've been telling you for a long time about Patriot Mobile.
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: But there's no better time to switch than right now.
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: Not only does Patriot Mobile operate on all three major
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: networks in this country, yeah, all three. That means you
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: get the same great coverage you're used to right now,
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: but you also make a difference with every call you
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: make and every text.
• 15:42
  Speaker 2: You make, And why would you want to give your
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: money to Big Mobile?
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: Big Mobile has been giving big donations to democratic causes,
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: democratic candidates, and radical left organizations. I'm talking about organizations
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: that actually support abortion. That is why I want you
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: to switch right now to Patriot Mobile. Go ahead and
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: make the switch, and it's so easy. All you have
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: to do is simply call Patriot Mobiles one hundred percent
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: US based team from the comfort of your home or
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: your office and they'll have you activated in minutes. And
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: if you're still locked in a contract, not a problem.
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: Patriots Mobile contract buyout program covers up to five hundred
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: dollars per device. Keep your same number, keep your phone,
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: or upgrade do a new one. So back to my point,
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: what are you waiting for? Call Patriot Mobile today and
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: make a difference every single day with every call you make.
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: com slash ferguson or nine seven to two Patriot And
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: if you use the promo code ferguson, you're gonna get
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: a free month of service on top of that Patriot
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine seven two Patriot.
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: That's Patriot mobile dot com slash Ferguson or nine seven
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: to two Patriot. Let me also one other thing about
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: these pardons. I don't think that there is anyone out
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: there that it looks at this in an honest way
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: that actually believes that Joe Biden knew who was getting pardoned.
• 17:14
  Speaker 2: I believe that he knew his son. I do.
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: I do believe he knew his son was getting a pardon.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: He signed it. It was important to him. It was
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: something that he wanted to happen. He wanted to make
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: sure it was done the right way. But Senator Paul
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: and the way that he described it, he's absolutely right.
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: Take a listen to this.
• 17:35
  Speaker 5: But I've got to get to another issue with you, sir,
• 17:37
  Speaker 5: because the New York Times is reporting that Biden's Joe
• 17:40
  Speaker 5: Biden's former chief of staff, Jeff Ziance.
• 17:43
  Speaker 4: Was the one who approved the auto.
• 17:45
  Speaker 5: Pens use for the eleventh hour pardons. That's the night
• 17:48
  Speaker 5: before Joe Biden left office, they started pardoning all these people.
• 17:52
  Speaker 5: The pardons included a preemptive partum for General Mark Millie,
• 17:57
  Speaker 5: a preemptive pardum for doctor Anthony Fauci. Now you are
• 18:01
  Speaker 5: reissuing your criminal referral of Anthony Fauci to the Department
• 18:05
  Speaker 5: of Justice. Your reaction to now Jeff Sience being the
• 18:10
  Speaker 5: one who pardoned Fauci. Okay, it wasn't Joe Biden.
• 18:13
  Speaker 6: He was pardoned by Jeff Sience.
• 18:16
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 18:16
  Speaker 4: My first question is who knew?
• 18:18
  Speaker 7: Who knew that there was a president Jeff Zience and
• 18:21
  Speaker 7: he was in charge of pardons. I mean, it is
• 18:24
  Speaker 7: really shocking and on all likelihood criminal. Now will they
• 18:28
  Speaker 7: try to backpedal and say Biden was somethow involved?
• 18:31
  Speaker 2: I think that's what they'll try.
• 18:33
  Speaker 7: But an autopen pardon, preemptive pardon, there's a lot to
• 18:36
  Speaker 7: go on here. The only way we could actually get
• 18:39
  Speaker 7: this into court is hopefully the DOJ would do.
• 18:42
  Speaker 2: Their job and died Anthony Fauci.
• 18:44
  Speaker 7: For the felony of Lyne to Congress and then take
• 18:46
  Speaker 7: it to court and then they can plead that you know,
• 18:49
  Speaker 7: he has been pardoned, But then the court could judge
• 18:52
  Speaker 7: whether the pardon is valid. So the only way we
• 18:54
  Speaker 7: get this into court is someone who's been pardoned will
• 18:57
  Speaker 7: have to be indicted, and I would promote the Anthony
• 19:00
  Speaker 7: Falci is a prime specimen for this.
• 19:03
  Speaker 2: A prime specimen for this.
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: It is clear that Senator ram Paul is giving a
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: play to the Republican leadership of this is how you
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: do this, This is what we should do. Senator Van Holland,
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: by the way, on CNN, adding this again to what
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: has happened so far, and I want you to hear
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: what he had to say to John Berman at CNN.
• 19:34
  Speaker 6: The New York Times spoke to former President Biden and
• 19:37
  Speaker 6: published a story overnight on the use of autopens for
• 19:41
  Speaker 6: some of the commutations impartans at the end of his term,
• 19:44
  Speaker 6: and one of the things that was reported was that
• 19:47
  Speaker 6: President Biden, while he approved of the commutations on classes
• 19:51
  Speaker 6: of people, he didn't necessarily sign off on every individual
• 19:56
  Speaker 6: one directly. How important do you feel that is and
• 19:59
  Speaker 6: where you think this issue goes now.
• 20:02
  Speaker 8: John, I was just reading those reports this morning as well.
• 20:06
  Speaker 8: My understanding is that you know, President Biden did look
• 20:11
  Speaker 8: at these pardons, whether or not they came in classes
• 20:14
  Speaker 8: of pardons, like these are people being pardoned because they
• 20:17
  Speaker 8: had mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses, and he
• 20:21
  Speaker 8: didn't think that that was appropriate that they'd served their
• 20:24
  Speaker 8: time well as opposed to each individual one I will
• 20:27
  Speaker 8: have to take a look at that entire issue.
• 20:30
  Speaker 1: Wow, my understanding is that you know, President Biden did
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: look at these pardons. So the question now becomes, who's
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: Lyne who is lying to the American people, an old
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: senile man that covered up the cognitive decline and the
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: auto pen that is proof that he wasn't signing these
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: or or could it be that the people around the
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: President of the United States America knew exactly what was
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: going on and they say we're going to hand out
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: pardons like candy to anybody that wants won using an
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: auto pen without the president even knowing about it.
• 21:09
  Speaker 2: I think we all know the real answer to that question.
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: Center Lindsey Graham went on Meet the Press and was
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: very angry. He was angry about the lies the medium
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: told over Russian intelligence and the Russian collusion story. Back
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: in two thoy and sixteen. Lindsey Graham having this to say,
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: he was in Congress, you may remember then, and he
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: knew exactly what was going on in sixteen, and now
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: he's got three seats to show what the Biden regime
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: was doing to try to overthrow the will of the
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: people with a coup attempt against Donald Trump.
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: Here is Lindsey on NBC. Take a listen.
• 21:53
  Speaker 9: All right, well, let me ask you about this twist
• 21:55
  Speaker 9: that happened this week. President Trump that seemed to want
• 21:59
  Speaker 9: to try to shut down questions about the Epstein files
• 22:02
  Speaker 9: by accusing former President Obama of treason. This came as
• 22:07
  Speaker 9: his Director of National Intelligence, Toulci Gabbert, declassified documents which
• 22:11
  Speaker 9: alleged top Obama officials manufactured information related to Russian interference
• 22:16
  Speaker 9: in the twenty sixteen election. Now, Senator, as you are
• 22:19
  Speaker 9: well aware, this actually contradicts a bipartisan Senate intelligence report
• 22:24
  Speaker 9: led by Marco Rubio, which found that Russia did, in
• 22:27
  Speaker 9: fact interfere in the election. Do you actually believe that
• 22:31
  Speaker 9: for President Obama committed treason?
• 22:35
  Speaker 10: Well, I think somebody needs to look at what we found.
• 22:39
  Speaker 10: The Intel Committee looked at the matter, and they said,
• 22:42
  Speaker 10: in twenty seventeen, the intelligence analysis of twenty seventeen showing
• 22:48
  Speaker 10: that Russia was trying to interfere.
• 22:51
  Speaker 4: In our election was real. They didn't achieve their goal.
• 22:55
  Speaker 10: But what she found, miss Gabbert, is that in twenty sixteen,
• 23:01
  Speaker 10: the intelligence community, he told President Obama.
• 23:04
  Speaker 4: There's no evidence that Russia was involved.
• 23:06
  Speaker 10: In trying to change the outcome of the election, and
• 23:09
  Speaker 10: he supposedly told a group of people keep looking and
• 23:13
  Speaker 10: the analysis changed.
• 23:15
  Speaker 4: So what we're looking at is.
• 23:17
  Speaker 10: Did what role did Obama play in twenty sixteen to
• 23:21
  Speaker 10: change the narrative that resulted in twenty seventeen. I'm not
• 23:24
  Speaker 10: alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me.
• 23:28
  Speaker 10: It's disturbing that this is new information. Now you got
• 23:32
  Speaker 10: the number two guy at the FBI, don mister Bongino,
• 23:36
  Speaker 10: saying he's seeing things that has changed his life. And
• 23:40
  Speaker 10: I assume now he's referring to Russia. So the best
• 23:43
  Speaker 10: way to handle this is if there are if there
• 23:46
  Speaker 10: is evidence of a crime being committed or suspected evidence
• 23:50
  Speaker 10: of a crime being committed, create a special counsel to
• 23:53
  Speaker 10: look at it.
• 23:54
  Speaker 4: I think that's the best way to go.
• 23:56
  Speaker 9: Okay, let me follow up with you on your calls
• 23:59
  Speaker 9: for a special council investigation.
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: Let's just pause there.
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: Lindsey Graham just called for a special prosecutor to investigate this.
• 24:10
  Speaker 2: He knows what he's saying. By the way, when he
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: said this.
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: He also went after the Washington Post and The New
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: York Times, and he went after the media for how
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: they covered the Russian collusion story, and then in essence
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: they were in on it as well.
• 24:28
  Speaker 4: I think that's the best way to go.
• 24:30
  Speaker 9: Okay, let me follow up with you on your calls
• 24:32
  Speaker 9: for a special council investigation. As you know, Senator, there
• 24:37
  Speaker 9: was already a Trump appointed special council at the time
• 24:41
  Speaker 9: investigating the origins of the Russia probe, but did not
• 24:44
  Speaker 9: find any evidence of political interference. And Senator, at the time,
• 24:49
  Speaker 9: you agreed with the findings of the intelligence community. I
• 24:52
  Speaker 9: want to play back what you said at the time.
• 24:54
  Speaker 10: Take a look, ye, the Russians did it. It was
• 24:57
  Speaker 10: the Russians who tried to interfere in our election. Every
• 24:59
  Speaker 10: memory where the committee agrees it was the Russians. They
• 25:02
  Speaker 10: didn't change the outcome, but they did release information embarrassing
• 25:06
  Speaker 10: to the Democratic Party.
• 25:07
  Speaker 4: It did affect Hillary Clinton.
• 25:09
  Speaker 10: There's only one person in Washington that I know of
• 25:12
  Speaker 10: that has any doubt about what Russia did in our
• 25:14
  Speaker 10: election as President Trump.
• 25:16
  Speaker 9: Senator, are you now saying that you don't believe that
• 25:20
  Speaker 9: Russia tried to interfere in the twenty.
• 25:22
  Speaker 10: Sixteen election, Well, what I am saying is that you
• 25:26
  Speaker 10: left a lot out.
• 25:27
  Speaker 4: Here's called the Horowitz report.
• 25:29
  Speaker 10: Is the Mueller investigation was crooked and rotten to the corps.
• 25:33
  Speaker 10: The Washington Post and the New York Times got a
• 25:35
  Speaker 10: pull up surprise for reporting on Trump's campaigns relationship with Russia.
• 25:41
  Speaker 10: It was all bs at the time. I didn't know
• 25:44
  Speaker 10: any of that. At the time. I didn't know that
• 25:47
  Speaker 10: they were manufacturing evidence to get PHISA warrants.
• 25:50
  Speaker 4: There was a confirmation bias.
• 25:52
  Speaker 10: Durham didn't say there was no political bias. He said
• 25:56
  Speaker 10: quite the opposite. He said, every time a FISA warrant
• 25:59
  Speaker 10: would saw it in the Muhler world, they got it.
• 26:04
  Speaker 10: And the errors made to get warrants in this space
• 26:08
  Speaker 10: were a lot greater than they were in anything not
• 26:11
  Speaker 10: involving Trump. But what I'm saying is that this is
• 26:14
  Speaker 10: new evidence. This is something I didn't know. You didn't
• 26:17
  Speaker 10: know that. In twenty sixteen, Obama suggested, I don't like
• 26:21
  Speaker 10: the outcome that there's no evidence Russia was involved. Well,
• 26:24
  Speaker 10: now we all say Russia was involved, but in twenty
• 26:27
  Speaker 10: sixteen they said Russia wasn't involved.
• 26:30
  Speaker 4: What's that happened. Let's get a special counsel hold on
• 26:33
  Speaker 4: et Center.
• 26:33
  Speaker 9: As you know, former President Obama has waited.
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: Through her spokes By the way, do you notice how
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: nervous Christian Welker is at NBC News over this. She's
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: nervous because she feels that they're losing the narrative. And
• 26:48
  Speaker 1: then Lindsey Graham goes into NBC News's reporting. He's like,
• 26:54
  Speaker 1: I talked about Washington posting your time, so I'll talk
• 26:56
  Speaker 1: about you guys too.
• 26:57
  Speaker 10: Let's get a special counsel hold on, et cetera.
• 26:59
  Speaker 9: As you know, former President Obama has waded through a spokesperson.
• 27:02
  Speaker 4: He says, that's just patently false.
• 27:04
  Speaker 9: I actually spoke to Susan Miller, who's a former senior
• 27:07
  Speaker 9: CIA officer who helped oversee the twenty seventeen intelligence assessment
• 27:11
  Speaker 9: on Russian interference. She says it's completely false that Obama
• 27:15
  Speaker 9: or anyone else asked them to change or sway their investigators.
• 27:19
  Speaker 9: She says, they all, she says, and she's a Republican,
• 27:23
  Speaker 9: says they all want to quit if that had happened. Senator,
• 27:26
  Speaker 9: are you trying to rewrite history to distract from the
• 27:29
  Speaker 9: Epstein matter?
• 27:30
  Speaker 10: Senator No, I'm trying to let you know and the
• 27:35
  Speaker 10: media know that we found something we.
• 27:37
  Speaker 4: Didn't know before. At the end of the day, I'm
• 27:40
  Speaker 4: not calling.
• 27:40
  Speaker 10: For a prosecution against President Obama for treason, but I
• 27:44
  Speaker 10: am calling for an investigation. Mister Miller also said there
• 27:48
  Speaker 10: was no credible evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians.
• 27:53
  Speaker 10: For years and months and days and weeks, people had
• 27:58
  Speaker 10: their lives turned upside down, chasing the mullered narrative that
• 28:02
  Speaker 10: Trump was in bed with the Russians, that the Trump
• 28:05
  Speaker 10: campaign was colluding with the Russians.
• 28:08
  Speaker 4: The only people colluding with the Russians.
• 28:10
  Speaker 10: Were the hill or a Clinton campaign and Christopher Steel
• 28:13
  Speaker 10: manufacturing a document to get warrants against Carter Page based
• 28:18
  Speaker 10: on lies and falsehoods.
• 28:20
  Speaker 4: So yeah, I'm very familiar with it.
• 28:22
  Speaker 10: What you don't seem to acknowledge is there something new
• 28:25
  Speaker 10: being found. Rather than reinventing the wheel here, let's go
• 28:29
  Speaker 10: back to a special Council model to look at this
• 28:32
  Speaker 10: something new, something new as statements by President Obama.
• 28:37
  Speaker 4: I don't like your analysis.
• 28:39
  Speaker 10: Russia wasn't involved here in twenty sixty Center.
• 28:42
  Speaker 4: You're saying there's something new.
• 28:43
  Speaker 9: This report goes back to twenty twenty.
• 28:46
  Speaker 4: It's five years old.
• 28:47
  Speaker 9: There's actually nothing new in this report and nothing that
• 28:50
  Speaker 9: changes any conlusion.
• 28:51
  Speaker 4: But I want to talk about nover is new to me.
• 28:55
  Speaker 4: I did say it's new to me trying to speak
• 28:58
  Speaker 4: this stuff fronder the rug, and that's not right.
• 29:00
  Speaker 9: But Senator, you know that at the time you said
• 29:02
  Speaker 9: you did believe the assessments and the multiple investigations.
• 29:06
  Speaker 4: But let me move on to Gaza. Let's talk about that.
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: I love how fast by the way She's like, let's
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: move on to Gaza. Lindsey Graham making it pretty clear.
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: I'm not calling for prosecution Obama for Trees. I'm calling
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: for an investigation, and you're trying to sweep this stuff
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: under the rug.
• 29:22
  Speaker 2: And that's not right. And what we've learned now is.
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: Completely different than what we were told in twenty sixteen
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: we relied to. So what I said then is completely
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: different than the reality in twenty twenty five of what
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: we're now learning because of these documents that have been released.
• 29:43
  Speaker 2: And I think it's pretty clear that the.
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: Media now is trying to act like there's nothing there, right,
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: that there's no there there, like they just oh, there's
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: nothing to nothing to see here, nothing to talk about here,
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: nothing to men, nothing at all, just no, no, everything's.
• 30:03
  Speaker 2: You know, look the other way.
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: There's nothing here here, everything's just it's totally different.
• 30:08
  Speaker 2: And he's saying, we got new intel. We were lied to.
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: What I said back then was based on a different
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: set of of intel was based on a different set
• 30:19
  Speaker 1: of information. It was based on a very different set
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: of information and intel we.
• 30:27
  Speaker 2: Were lied to.
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: So you want to act like what I was saying
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: back then is somehow accurate. I guess back then, but
• 30:38
  Speaker 1: not now. We have new information. And if we have
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: new information, why would I not change my assessment? And
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: you're trying to sweep it under the rug by the way,
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: he's absolutely right about that, like absolutely one thousand percent
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: right about all of this. Don't forget share this podcast
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: please with your family and your friends wherever they are,
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: and I will see you back here tomorrow