Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / SCUMBAG AG GARLAND secret memo CITES 13 WAYS TO ARREST PARENTS AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETING!

Transcript

SCUMBAG AG GARLAND secret memo CITES 13 WAYS TO ARREST PARENTS AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETING! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: You are still a domestic terrorists. That's right. The Attorney
0:06
Speaker 1: General of the the United States America A. G. Garland, is
0:10
Speaker 1: refusing to withdraw his memo declaring that if you're a
0:14
Speaker 1: parent that speaks out at a school board meeting, that
0:18
Speaker 1: we will not look at you any differently than what
0:20
Speaker 1: could possibly be declared as a domestic terrorist. After shocking
0:26
Speaker 1: testimony before the United States Senate, Garland is refusing to
0:31
Speaker 1: back down. In fact, we now know there's a new
0:34
Speaker 1: memo that tells his prosecutors law enforcement how to come
0:40
Speaker 1: after parents, even if you just do something as simple
0:43
Speaker 1: as making a phone call expressing your thoughts to a
0:46
Speaker 1: school board member that could then turn you into a
0:50
Speaker 1: domestic terrorist. Nowaday's podcast, we're going to have US center
0:56
Speaker 1: Marsha Blackburn, who actually questioned General Garland over this issue
1:02
Speaker 1: in just a moment. But before I get to all
1:05
Speaker 1: of this shocking audio and to the Senator, I want
1:08
Speaker 1: to ask you to do me a favor. Please make
1:11
Speaker 1: sure number one, you hit the subscribe button to our
1:13
Speaker 1: podcast or the auto download button so that you can
1:16
Speaker 1: get the show every day. Number two, please share this
1:20
Speaker 1: podcast with your family and friends, because everyone in this
1:26
Speaker 1: country needs to know that we now have an attorney
1:29
Speaker 1: general a tyrant under the regime of Biden, and under
1:33
Speaker 1: Biden's command, they are going to come after parents for
1:39
Speaker 1: expressing their thoughts and feelings, and they're criminalizing your freedom
1:44
Speaker 1: of speech, your freedom of expression, and they want to
1:47
Speaker 1: treat you, not want they are treating you the same
1:50
Speaker 1: way they treated terrorists. After nine to eleven, parents, you
1:55
Speaker 1: may be a domestic terrorists under the new guidelines from
1:58
Speaker 1: the Attorney General Garland if you show up or make
2:01
Speaker 1: a phone call, or organize on Facebook against people that
2:06
Speaker 1: are trying to indoctrinate your children in our public school systems.
2:09
Speaker 1: Earlier today, I spoke with Marcia Blackburn as she got
2:14
Speaker 1: to have a very blunt discussion with the Attorney General Garland.
2:18
Speaker 1: I'm going to have that for you coming up in
2:19
Speaker 1: a moment. Now. I want to play for you some
2:23
Speaker 1: incredible audio from Senor Ted Cruz, who actually questioned the
2:28
Speaker 1: Attorney General Garland over the anti Parent Memo, a memo
2:33
Speaker 1: that turns parents into domestic terrorists, A memo that tells
2:37
Speaker 1: prosecutors basically a dozen plus ways to prosecute parents for
2:44
Speaker 1: being involved in their kids' lives and for having basically,
2:49
Speaker 1: we're now criminalizing freedom of speech and freedom of thought. Now,
2:52
Speaker 1: Senor Ted Cruz a brilliant legal mind. A lot of
2:55
Speaker 1: people wo think of him more as a senator. Now
2:56
Speaker 1: he's I would argue, a senator second, and a brilliant politic,
3:00
Speaker 1: a brilliant legal mind first. And that's why I'm going
3:03
Speaker 1: to play this audio because it's incredible to watch him
3:06
Speaker 1: dismantle the insanity of Garland, the Attorney Journal, the United
3:09
Speaker 1: Stents American, and the Biden regime who are coming after
3:12
Speaker 1: parents for just speaking up about their kids' education. Take
3:17
Speaker 1: a listen. For eight years under Barack Obama, the Department
3:22
Speaker 1: of Justice was politicized and weaponized. When you came before
3:27
Speaker 1: this committee and your confirmation hearing, you promised things would
3:29
Speaker 1: be different. I asked you specifically, quote, will you commit
3:33
Speaker 1: to this committee that under your leadership, the Department of
3:36
Speaker 1: Justice will not target the political opponents of this administration.
3:40
Speaker 1: Here was your answer, quote, absolutely, it's totally inappropriate for
3:44
Speaker 1: the Department to target any individual because of their politics
3:48
Speaker 1: or their position in a campaign. That was your promise
3:51
Speaker 1: just a few months ago. I'm sorry to say you
3:54
Speaker 1: have broken that promise. There is a difference between law
3:58
Speaker 1: and politics. In general, Garland, you know the difference between
4:02
Speaker 1: law and politics. Law is based on facts, It is impartial,
4:08
Speaker 1: It is not used as a tool of political retribution.
4:12
Speaker 1: This memo was not law. This memo was politics. Now,
4:21
Speaker 1: Centator Ted Cruze is absolutely right that this memo was
4:25
Speaker 1: one hundred percent a political decision made by the Attorney
4:28
Speaker 1: General to come after parents and attack parents, and to
4:32
Speaker 1: treat them not even equate to actually treat them, to
4:37
Speaker 1: treat you as a concerned parent about your kid's education
4:40
Speaker 1: as a domestic terrorists, the same way that we treated
4:43
Speaker 1: domestic terrorists after nine eleven. That is a fact. They
4:48
Speaker 1: made a decision politically because a powerful teacher's union decided
4:54
Speaker 1: to send out a request to shut parents up, going, hey,
4:58
Speaker 1: we don't like these parents getting involve here, right, Like
5:01
Speaker 1: these parents that have kind of gotten woken up. We
5:04
Speaker 1: kind of need you guys to shut him up. We
5:07
Speaker 1: don't We feel threatened, right because we're all woke. We
5:11
Speaker 1: feel threatened as we try to indoctrinate their kids, try
5:14
Speaker 1: to cover up heinous crimes that are being committed against
5:17
Speaker 1: their kids. Two different rapes were covered up in loudon County,
5:21
Speaker 1: for example, you're a hilmer about that in a moment.
5:24
Speaker 1: Because the school board didn't want to let it be
5:27
Speaker 1: known that their transgender bathroom policy allowed for a guy
5:30
Speaker 1: dressed like a chick in a skirt to go into
5:32
Speaker 1: a bathroom and rape two different people, they moved him
5:37
Speaker 1: actually from one school to another school just to make
5:39
Speaker 1: it go away. And when the kid got the second school,
5:41
Speaker 1: he did it again, sexually assaulted another girl. Because they
5:46
Speaker 1: didn't want it to make their transgendered bathroom woke rules
5:50
Speaker 1: look bad, and this kid would make them look bad.
5:52
Speaker 1: So instead of protecting your child, they decided that instead
5:56
Speaker 1: they would protect their woke ideas, their ideals, whatever the
6:00
Speaker 1: hell you want to call them. They're an anarchy, they're insanity.
6:04
Speaker 1: There's psychotic nature that they believe that they own your children,
6:08
Speaker 1: and you have nothing you can say about your children.
6:12
Speaker 1: They own your children, and you must shut up and
6:16
Speaker 1: you must be silent. This goes back to exactly the
6:20
Speaker 1: big fight that is happening right now in Virginia. What's
6:23
Speaker 1: happening in Virginia right now is you have a fight
6:25
Speaker 1: because you have a governor that said publicly multiple times
6:27
Speaker 1: on stage, parents should have no right to dictate and
6:30
Speaker 1: or tell school boards what we should or shouldn't be
6:34
Speaker 1: teaching your kids. You have no rights when you drop
6:37
Speaker 1: your kids off. Your kid is a product, a property
6:42
Speaker 1: of the state. It's probably the best way I can
6:45
Speaker 1: describe it. Your child becomes property of the state. And
6:51
Speaker 1: that's exactly how they're going to treat your kid. When
6:55
Speaker 1: you drop your kid off. You can shut up. When
6:57
Speaker 1: you drop your kid off, you can shut up and
7:00
Speaker 1: leave us alone. If you show up and you talk
7:02
Speaker 1: to us, we will treat you like you're a member
7:04
Speaker 1: of ISIS or al Qaida, and legally we will come
7:07
Speaker 1: after you. In fact, we have a dozen plus waits.
7:09
Speaker 1: The Attorney General has now said that we can come
7:11
Speaker 1: after you. That is what they are doing. What if
7:18
Speaker 1: you don't even show up for a school board, but
7:20
Speaker 1: you make a phone call, we've criminalized that now. Senator
7:23
Speaker 1: take Cruz talked about it in this memo. How parents
7:26
Speaker 1: now their behavior of calling being involved is criminalized at
7:30
Speaker 1: a federal level. On Wednesday, September twenty ninth, the National
7:35
Speaker 1: school Board Association wrote a letter to the President asking
7:42
Speaker 1: the President to use the Department of Justice to target
7:45
Speaker 1: parents that were upset at critical race theory, that we're
7:48
Speaker 1: upset at mass mandates and schools to target them as
7:51
Speaker 1: domestic terrorists. On the face of the letter, the letter
7:55
Speaker 1: was in repeated consultation with the White House. In explicit
7:59
Speaker 1: political consultation with the White House. That was on Wednesday,
8:02
Speaker 1: September twenty nine, five days later on Monday, So right
8:06
Speaker 1: after the weekend, boom, you pop out a memo giving
8:11
Speaker 1: them exactly what they want. Now, by the way, I
8:14
Speaker 1: understand that in politics that happens all the time. An
8:17
Speaker 1: important special interest wants something, sir, Yes, sir, we're gonna
8:21
Speaker 1: listen to him. Let me ask you something, General Garland,
8:25
Speaker 1: in the letter which you told the House of Representative
8:28
Speaker 1: was the basis for this abuse of memo targeting parents.
8:33
Speaker 1: How many incidents are cited in that memo? I have
8:38
Speaker 1: to look back through the memo. I can't. You don't
8:41
Speaker 1: know how many of them are violent? Again, the General repair,
8:45
Speaker 1: how many of them were violent? Do you know? I
8:47
Speaker 1: don't know. You don't know, And there's a reason you
8:49
Speaker 1: don't know, because you didn't care, and nobody in your
8:54
Speaker 1: office cared to find out. I did a quick count
8:57
Speaker 1: just sitting here during this hearing. I counted twenty incidents cited.
9:02
Speaker 1: Of the twenty, fifteen on their face are non violent.
9:06
Speaker 1: They involved things like insults. They involve a Nazi salute.
9:10
Speaker 1: That's one of the examples. My god, a parent did
9:13
Speaker 1: a Nazi saluted a school board because he thought the
9:16
Speaker 1: policies were oppressive. General Garland is doing a Nazi salute
9:20
Speaker 1: an elected official, as that protected by the First Amendment. Yes,
9:22
Speaker 1: it is okay. Fifteen of the twenty, on the face
9:26
Speaker 1: of it, are not violent. They're not threats of violence.
9:29
Speaker 1: Their parents who were unhappy yet miraculously, when you write
9:33
Speaker 1: a memo the opening line of your memo. In recent
9:37
Speaker 1: months there has been a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation
9:42
Speaker 1: and threats of violence. You know what, You didn't look
9:45
Speaker 1: and nobody on your on your staff look, did you
9:48
Speaker 1: even look up the twenty instances? As I testified it,
9:53
Speaker 1: the decision to make the send a memo is born.
9:56
Speaker 1: A said, did you look up the twenty instances? I
9:58
Speaker 1: did not read. Did anyone on your staff look him up?
10:00
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer, but it's but of course
10:03
Speaker 1: you don't. In general, there's a reason. Look, you started
10:05
Speaker 1: your career as a law clerk to Justice Brennan. You've
10:09
Speaker 1: had many law clerks during the year during your time
10:13
Speaker 1: as a judge. I was a clerk to Chief Justice
10:16
Speaker 1: rank Uist. I'll tell you what if I drafted an
10:19
Speaker 1: opinion for the Chief Justice and walked in and it said,
10:22
Speaker 1: there's a disturbing pattern of violence. Well, Ted, how do
10:25
Speaker 1: you know that? Well, I got an ambocaust brief here?
10:27
Speaker 1: Who claims it? You would fire a law clerk who
10:31
Speaker 1: did that. You're the Attorney General of the United States.
10:35
Speaker 1: This was not a tweet you sent. This is a
10:38
Speaker 1: memo to the Federal Bureau of Investigations saying, go investigate
10:45
Speaker 1: parents as domestic terrorists. That is not what the memo
10:48
Speaker 1: says at all. Is it what the letter says? That
10:51
Speaker 1: is not is it what the letter says? By the way,
10:54
Speaker 1: the point take Cruiz is making here is your letter
10:57
Speaker 1: says exactly that it doesn't matter what the law says,
11:02
Speaker 1: because your letter says something totally different. You have weaponized
11:06
Speaker 1: the United States government to go after children, or excuse me,
11:10
Speaker 1: go after parents of children who are just raising concerns
11:13
Speaker 1: about what you're doing to their children, and you're treating
11:15
Speaker 1: them like domestic terrorists. And the scary part is I'm
11:18
Speaker 1: going to keep playing this, is that Garland refuses to
11:22
Speaker 1: rescind this memo, stands behind it wholeheartedly that any parent
11:28
Speaker 1: that gets out of line or raises their voice, you
11:32
Speaker 1: will be treated quite possibly the domestic terrorists and arrested.
11:34
Speaker 1: And we have a playbook of how to arrest you.
11:36
Speaker 1: We have a list of things we can charge you with.
11:40
Speaker 1: Senator Cruz and the point that he is making with
11:44
Speaker 1: his conversation with the Attorney General the United States of America, Garland,
11:48
Speaker 1: is none of what you have done attacking parents and
11:53
Speaker 1: treating them like domestic terrorists when in fact they're not,
11:56
Speaker 1: They're just concerned parents. Is raising their voices to those
11:59
Speaker 1: that are trying to destroy your kids' lives is based
12:04
Speaker 1: in law. And you're the Attorney General of the United
12:06
Speaker 1: States of America and you run an anti parent memo
12:10
Speaker 1: because you believe that the parents have no rights their children.
12:13
Speaker 1: The state owns those children and gets to indoctrinate those children.
12:18
Speaker 1: And that is not law, that is propaganda, that is politics.
12:23
Speaker 1: And by the way, I think Garland knows that that's
12:25
Speaker 1: exactly right. You're the Attorney General of the United States.
12:29
Speaker 1: This was not a tweet you sent. This is a
12:33
Speaker 1: memo to the Federal Bureau of Investigations saying, go investigate
12:39
Speaker 1: parents as domestic terrorists. That is not what the memo
12:42
Speaker 1: says at all. Is it what the letter says? That
12:45
Speaker 1: is not what? Is it what the letter says? I
12:48
Speaker 1: don't care what the letter says. You don't care. You
12:50
Speaker 1: said it was the basis of your memo. You testified
12:52
Speaker 1: under oath before the House of Representatives. The letter was
12:54
Speaker 1: the basis of your memo. Now you don't care about
12:56
Speaker 1: the letter. The letter and public reports of lens and
13:00
Speaker 1: threats of violence. My memo says nothing about domestic terrorism,
13:04
Speaker 1: says nothing about parents committing any such things. My memo
13:08
Speaker 1: is an attempt to get an assessment of whether there
13:10
Speaker 1: is a problem out there that the federal government needs
13:13
Speaker 1: to A letter on its face says the actions of
13:17
Speaker 1: the apparents could be the equivalent to a form of
13:19
Speaker 1: domestic terrorism that is wrong, and asks the President to
13:22
Speaker 1: use the Patriot Act in regards to domestic terrorism erected
13:26
Speaker 1: at parents. And this was the basis of your memo.
13:31
Speaker 1: The Department of Justice, when you're directing the FBI to
13:34
Speaker 1: engage in law enforcement. You're not behaving as a political
13:39
Speaker 1: operative because a political ally of the president says, hey,
13:44
Speaker 1: go attack these parents because we don't like what they're saying.
13:48
Speaker 1: Apartment of Justice, you did no independent research on what
13:51
Speaker 1: was happening? Did you? The memo has nothing to do
13:55
Speaker 1: with part. Did you do independent research? The memo? Had
13:58
Speaker 1: you do independent research? Memo has nothing to do You're
14:00
Speaker 1: not answering that questions. You've testified you know nothing about
14:07
Speaker 1: the violent sexual assault that happened in Loudon County, even
14:09
Speaker 1: though it's one of the bases in this letter I
14:12
Speaker 1: read about it since then, By the way, the point
14:15
Speaker 1: you're about to hear is so important. This goes back
14:18
Speaker 1: to the parents and the school board. You have a
14:21
Speaker 1: school board in Loudon County, as I mentioned earlier, that
14:24
Speaker 1: covered up the rape of a student because it would
14:27
Speaker 1: go it would hurt their transgender policy because it's a
14:31
Speaker 1: dude wearing a skirt that when the girl's bathroom and
14:33
Speaker 1: rape not one, but now we know two different girls
14:36
Speaker 1: and instead of actually and by the way, the kid
14:38
Speaker 1: has been found guilty of one of those crimes, they
14:43
Speaker 1: covered it up. Moving to another school, covered it up
14:49
Speaker 1: and just moved him down the road. It's like the
14:51
Speaker 1: Catholic church where they would do with a priest that
14:53
Speaker 1: were molesting children, just move them to another church. Right,
14:56
Speaker 1: Who cares? We don't want to admit that we have
14:59
Speaker 1: a problem, so let's just cover it up. That's the
15:04
Speaker 1: easiest way to deal with this, Just flat out cover
15:07
Speaker 1: it up. It's exactly why Senator Tom Cotton said that
15:12
Speaker 1: the ag should resign. Yeah, he actually said he should
15:16
Speaker 1: resign over what he has done because it's such a disgrace.
15:22
Speaker 1: You guys have weaponized the Department of Justice. You have
15:28
Speaker 1: politicized it to the point where now you're treating parents
15:31
Speaker 1: like domestic tears, and you have parents all they're doing
15:35
Speaker 1: is standing up for their children. That's it, that's all
15:40
Speaker 1: you're doing. Let me tell you what the judge found
15:44
Speaker 1: in the Loudon County case before I get back to
15:46
Speaker 1: this audio real quick. The judge isn't announced an explosive
15:51
Speaker 1: Loudon County school bathroom ruling finding this fifteen year old
15:54
Speaker 1: boy guilty of sexual assault in the girl's bathroom and
15:58
Speaker 1: the school covered it up. And then the father who
16:00
Speaker 1: lost his mind when the school board covered up was
16:03
Speaker 1: arrested and treated like a domestic terrorist. Don't forget that
16:06
Speaker 1: part of this story. Okay, the father went to the
16:09
Speaker 1: school board, the school board lied, He got angry, he
16:12
Speaker 1: started yelling. They slammed him the floor, arrested him and
16:16
Speaker 1: took him out of the school board meeting and treated
16:19
Speaker 1: him like a domestic terrorist because he was mad that
16:23
Speaker 1: a school board covered up the fact that a fifteen
16:26
Speaker 1: year old boy who has now been found guilty. So
16:28
Speaker 1: this is enough for interpretation. It's a fact now the
16:30
Speaker 1: fifteen year old boy has been found guilty of sexual
16:32
Speaker 1: assault in the girl's bathroom of the man's daughter. The
16:37
Speaker 1: ruling comes into the controversial transgender school bathroom accommodations in
16:41
Speaker 1: Loudon County Woke Virginia because the bathroom Woke agenda for
16:48
Speaker 1: transgender accommodations was more important than actually protecting a child
16:52
Speaker 1: from being raped by a dude wearing a skirt in
16:55
Speaker 1: a bathroom in the girl's bathroom, the chart include one
17:00
Speaker 1: felony account of fortunable stat to me and one felony
17:02
Speaker 1: account of rape. The judge, Pamela Brooks rolled I found
17:07
Speaker 1: the fact sufficient to support the charges. The victims said.
17:09
Speaker 1: The two were quote just friends and said she never
17:11
Speaker 1: gave permission or consent for the encounter. And this is
17:14
Speaker 1: exactly what the school board covered up because they couldn't
17:18
Speaker 1: stand press that would make them look like idiots, that
17:22
Speaker 1: would show them that allowing dudes into chick's bathrooms was
17:25
Speaker 1: a bad idea. The boy was fourteen years old at
17:29
Speaker 1: the time. Text the victim master and meet him in
17:31
Speaker 1: the girl's bathroom. He threw her to the four forced
17:33
Speaker 1: himself upon her. According the Washington Post, he flipped me over.
17:36
Speaker 1: She said, I was on the ground and couldn't move,
17:38
Speaker 1: and he sexually assaulted me. But hey, Virginia Department of
17:44
Speaker 1: Education says it's transgender policies required that quote, access to
17:48
Speaker 1: facilities such as restrooms and locker rooms that correspond to
17:51
Speaker 1: his student's gender identity shall be available to all students,
17:55
Speaker 1: and Loudon Kenny said, absolutely, we're going to do it
17:57
Speaker 1: because we think this is great. We think this is great.
18:03
Speaker 1: Listen to the lack of compassion that Garwin has for
18:07
Speaker 1: the girl. The girls I should say that were raped. Okay,
18:11
Speaker 1: you told the house last week. You know nothing about it,
18:14
Speaker 1: not at the time. Now, Okay, this week the court
18:17
Speaker 1: concluded that a fourteen year old girl was violently raped
18:22
Speaker 1: by a boy wearing a skirt and the girl's restroom.
18:26
Speaker 1: The school district covered it up, release the boy sent
18:30
Speaker 1: him to another school where he violently raped another girl.
18:36
Speaker 1: The father who mister Holly just showed you was the
18:38
Speaker 1: father of the first girl. He was Understandably, do you
18:42
Speaker 1: understand why a parent would be upset when your daughter
18:46
Speaker 1: is raped at school, the school board covers it up
18:48
Speaker 1: and then lies to you and claims there have been
18:51
Speaker 1: no assaults. We have no instances of assaults in our bathroom,
18:56
Speaker 1: and that was a flat out lie, as the court
18:58
Speaker 1: concluded this week. Do you understand why the parent would
19:00
Speaker 1: be upset? Absolutely? And is any expressions of upset are
19:03
Speaker 1: completely protected by the first Except you just called him
19:06
Speaker 1: a domestic terror. Never called him that. That's not this
19:09
Speaker 1: letter calls him a domestic terrorist. You based a direction
19:13
Speaker 1: to the FBI, an official direction from the Attorney General
19:16
Speaker 1: on this letter. And I'll tell you what. The The
19:19
Speaker 1: NSBA is so embarrassed to this letter, they've apologized for
19:22
Speaker 1: it and retracted it. But you don't apparently have the
19:26
Speaker 1: same willingness to apologize and retract What you did. Let
19:29
Speaker 1: me ask you something else. A big part of this
19:32
Speaker 1: letter is that they're upset about parents not wanting critical
19:35
Speaker 1: race theory taught. But by the way, let me let
19:37
Speaker 1: me jump back in here, because I want to go
19:39
Speaker 1: back to this father that was arrested, because I think
19:42
Speaker 1: it's really important for you to understand the father. Now
19:45
Speaker 1: you heard Centator Ted Cruze just mentioned his colleague, Senator Holly,
19:50
Speaker 1: had had said sending moments before about this father. He
19:55
Speaker 1: brings out the picture of this father being slammed to
19:57
Speaker 1: the four, his clothes being ripped, and police officers treating
20:01
Speaker 1: him like a domestic terrorist. And Holly's point is, you
20:07
Speaker 1: think this guy should be arrested. You have a school
20:09
Speaker 1: board that cover up the rape of his daughter, and
20:11
Speaker 1: then that school, that same boy who was dressed like
20:13
Speaker 1: a girl, went to another school and did it again.
20:15
Speaker 1: And you don't think that guys can raise his voice
20:17
Speaker 1: at you and be angry when you're covering it up,
20:19
Speaker 1: and then you arrest him and treat him like a terrorist.
20:21
Speaker 1: Listen to this back and forth to the Attorney General,
20:23
Speaker 1: Mister Chairman, Attorney General Garland October fours, you issued an
20:27
Speaker 1: unprecedented memo that involves the Department of Justice and the
20:31
Speaker 1: FBI and local school district's, local school boards. Nothing like
20:34
Speaker 1: it in our country's history. It was based you've testified
20:38
Speaker 1: on this letter from the National school Board Association that
20:41
Speaker 1: we now know the White House was involved in writing.
20:43
Speaker 1: They've retracted the letter, they've apologized for the letter. They
20:46
Speaker 1: say they regret the letter, but you won't retract the
20:49
Speaker 1: memo and said earlier that you have no regrets, and
20:52
Speaker 1: you've defended yourself repeatedly today before this committee by a
20:55
Speaker 1: single Well, you're focused on violence. But now, of course
20:57
Speaker 1: we've seen the memo from your own Justice Department advising
21:01
Speaker 1: state and local and other prosecutors about all of the
21:04
Speaker 1: different federal causes of action that they can bring against
21:09
Speaker 1: parents that are not about violence. They're about harassment and intimidation.
21:13
Speaker 1: I'm looking here at this memo. It identifies no fewer
21:18
Speaker 1: than thirteen possible federal crimes involving harassment and intimidation, including
21:26
Speaker 1: making annoying phone calls. Do you think a parent, by
21:31
Speaker 1: the way, just thinking about that, they give it thirteen
21:33
Speaker 1: different things you can do to come after parents, including
21:36
Speaker 1: making annoying phone calls. So if you're this dad, your
21:39
Speaker 1: daughter's raped, you find out, they release the kid, don't
21:42
Speaker 1: charge the kid, and cover it up, and you make
21:44
Speaker 1: a phone call and you're angry with a school board member.
21:47
Speaker 1: Should that mean that you are domestic terrorists? Think about that.
21:51
Speaker 1: If you're a parent who makes a phone call to
21:54
Speaker 1: a school board member that she has elected, that that
21:57
Speaker 1: school board member deems annoying to be prosecuted, General Girl, No,
22:00
Speaker 1: I don't. And the Supreme Court has made quite clear
22:03
Speaker 1: that the word intimidation with respect to the Constitutional protection,
22:07
Speaker 1: it's one that directs a threat to a person with
22:09
Speaker 1: the intent of placing the victim in fear of bodily
22:12
Speaker 1: harm or death. Prosecutors who investigate these cases know the
22:18
Speaker 1: Supreme Courts this is a very famous in case. Prosecutors do,
22:22
Speaker 1: but parents don't. General Garland, do you do you think
22:25
Speaker 1: that a parent who looks at the thirteen different federal
22:29
Speaker 1: crimes that your Justice Department has identified they might be
22:33
Speaker 1: subject to and prosecuted for, like making annoying phone calls,
22:37
Speaker 1: do you think that they're going to feel that they're
22:39
Speaker 1: welcome to speak up at a school board meeting? How
22:40
Speaker 1: about this one? They could be prosecuted for using the Internet.
22:44
Speaker 1: I guess that would be Facebook in a way that
22:46
Speaker 1: might cause emotional distress. Let's talk about the emotional discress
22:49
Speaker 1: that Holly is mentioning right here. What the center Holly
22:52
Speaker 1: is saying is if you're a parent and you organize
22:55
Speaker 1: a Facebook group page, or even just a post on
22:57
Speaker 1: your own page to get parents to show up or
23:00
Speaker 1: phone calls, or to come to a school board meeting,
23:02
Speaker 1: or to start emailing and texting and calling a school
23:05
Speaker 1: board member that's gone rogue or there's covering up a
23:07
Speaker 1: sexual assault, you will be treated like a domestic terrorist.
23:11
Speaker 1: In fact, the Attorney General puts out a memo saying,
23:13
Speaker 1: here's thirteen ways to shut these parents up. Here's thirteen
23:16
Speaker 1: ways to turn these parents into domestic terrorists. To a victim?
23:21
Speaker 1: Is that is that a crime of violence? Senator, I
23:23
Speaker 1: haven't seen the memo that you're why haven't out and
23:26
Speaker 1: I don't even from the description it doesn't sound like
23:29
Speaker 1: it was addressed to parents. But if you know, it
23:32
Speaker 1: wasn't addressed the parents, it was addresed a prosecutors. That's
23:34
Speaker 1: the problem. Why haven't you seen the memo? I notice
23:39
Speaker 1: how dumb Garland all of a sudden is right. I
23:41
Speaker 1: didn't write the memo. This is a memo going out
23:43
Speaker 1: to all of his prosecutors all over the country saying,
23:46
Speaker 1: here is the list of things that you can do
23:49
Speaker 1: to prosecute parents. Here's the ways of prosecute them. Here's
23:53
Speaker 1: what you charge them with. Federal Crime's over, and Garland's like,
23:56
Speaker 1: I hadn't seen the memo. Really, I don't know why
23:59
Speaker 1: I haven't. I don't look at every I do not
24:01
Speaker 1: get every memo that every US Attorneys sends out. But
24:05
Speaker 1: if you're a wait, wait, don't don't I don't. I
24:07
Speaker 1: just want to be sure I understand this. This is
24:09
Speaker 1: a memorandum that collects thirteen different federal crimes parents could
24:14
Speaker 1: be charged with. It has United States Department of Justice
24:18
Speaker 1: on the top of it, and you're telling me you
24:20
Speaker 1: haven't seen it was a memo from Senator the United
24:23
Speaker 1: States Department of Justice, United States Attorney for the District
24:26
Speaker 1: of Montana. I have not seen a memo from the
24:28
Speaker 1: District of Montana. Not high enough priority for you, That's
24:32
Speaker 1: not the question, I don't it is the question. Answer
24:34
Speaker 1: my question. Is it not a high enough priority for you?
24:37
Speaker 1: When you're threatening parents with thirteen different federal crimes. These
24:41
Speaker 1: aren't crimes of violence. You've testified today. You're focused on violence.
24:46
Speaker 1: That's not what your US attorney, if they work for you,
24:48
Speaker 1: that's not what they're saying. You haven't seen it because
24:51
Speaker 1: it's not a high enough priority or what question of priority?
24:54
Speaker 1: No one has sent me that memo? So I haven't
24:56
Speaker 1: seen it. What do you mean no one has sent
24:57
Speaker 1: you the memo? You run the United States Department of Justice,
24:59
Speaker 1: do you not? Or one hundred and fifteen thousand employees
25:03
Speaker 1: of the Department of Justice. Indeed, and you are in
25:06
Speaker 1: charge of every one of them. And this was a
25:08
Speaker 1: sufficiently important case that you issued a memo. You over
25:12
Speaker 1: your signature, issued a memo involving the FBI and the
25:16
Speaker 1: Department of Justice in local school boards, local school districts.
25:20
Speaker 1: Your US attorneys are now threatening prosecution with thirteen different crimes.
25:25
Speaker 1: But it's not a high enough priority for you. We
25:27
Speaker 1: got lost in the mix. I'll send again, I've never
25:30
Speaker 1: seen that memo. That's what concerns me. General Garland, Well,
25:34
Speaker 1: it wasn't sent to me. I hope you will assure
25:36
Speaker 1: your constituents that what we are concerned about here is
25:40
Speaker 1: violence and threats of violence. I don't believe him, by
25:42
Speaker 1: the way, I don't believe him at all. I think
25:45
Speaker 1: it's what he's concerned with is shutting up, in silencing
25:49
Speaker 1: parents who are actually standing up at school board meetings
25:51
Speaker 1: and doing it to the point where he says, we're
25:53
Speaker 1: going to treat you like a tearst and you may
25:55
Speaker 1: go to prison and you may not see your kids
25:56
Speaker 1: for years. We will throw away the key because you
25:59
Speaker 1: spoke up at a meeting. US Senator Marsha Blackburne is
26:03
Speaker 1: with me now to talk about this. Senator, I want
26:06
Speaker 1: to play something else real quick and get your reaction
26:08
Speaker 1: to it, because one of your colleagues, Senator Holly press
26:11
Speaker 1: eg on a dad being arrested as school board meeting.
26:14
Speaker 1: I'm gonna play a little clip of this, and I
26:15
Speaker 1: want to get your reaction because it's shocking to me
26:18
Speaker 1: and it shows you just how I would argue evil.
26:21
Speaker 1: The Attorney General, his minions and the Biden administration is
26:24
Speaker 1: attacking parents. Listen to this. Prosecutors do, but parents don't.
26:29
Speaker 1: General Garland, do you do you think that a parent
26:31
Speaker 1: who looks at the thirteen different federal crimes that your
26:36
Speaker 1: Justice Department has identified they might be subject to and
26:39
Speaker 1: prosecuted for, like making annoying phone calls. Do you think
26:43
Speaker 1: that they're going to feel that they're welcome to speak
26:45
Speaker 1: up at a school board meeting? How about this one?
26:47
Speaker 1: They could be prosecuted for using the Internet. I guess
26:50
Speaker 1: that would be Facebook in a way that might cause
26:52
Speaker 1: emotional distress to a victim. Is that a crime of violence? Senator? Senator,
26:57
Speaker 1: you hear about these thirteen things that were laid out.
27:00
Speaker 1: It's shocking now that if a parent organizes a group
27:04
Speaker 1: of parents, which is how everybody seems to organize things
27:07
Speaker 1: now at a grassroots level on Facebook, on social media,
27:10
Speaker 1: that that could be used against him as a federal crime,
27:12
Speaker 1: and you could be charged with federal crimes. It would
27:15
Speaker 1: make you a fellon, put you in prison for organizing
27:18
Speaker 1: to show up at a school board meeting. And the
27:21
Speaker 1: Attorney General acted like he didn't know this memo existed,
27:24
Speaker 1: which is under his command. It was astanding the lack
27:30
Speaker 1: of awareness and knowledge, and you have to realize to
27:33
Speaker 1: Ben he seemed confused, he seemed frustrated, he was unprepared.
27:39
Speaker 1: He seemed as if he was very distance from the
27:43
Speaker 1: activities of his office. More that he is the figurehead
27:47
Speaker 1: and he is not a leader. And it was very
27:51
Speaker 1: apparent in that hearing yesterday and I pressed him on
27:57
Speaker 1: who wrote this memos and he not answer me. Senator
28:01
Speaker 1: Cruz followed me who wrote the memo? He would not
28:05
Speaker 1: answer the Senator. I mean, it went on and on
28:09
Speaker 1: because he said, well, he signed the memo. And then
28:14
Speaker 1: we went at him about the turnaround in time, because
28:18
Speaker 1: back in August forty four of my Republican Senate colleagues
28:23
Speaker 1: joined me on a letter to General Garland about the
28:29
Speaker 1: Durham investigation to ask for a status update and if
28:35
Speaker 1: they were going to make the reports public, and we've
28:39
Speaker 1: never received an answer. But after we wrote it, then
28:43
Speaker 1: they went on with the indictments and kind of got
28:47
Speaker 1: the ball ruggling. But see, it has been since August.
28:51
Speaker 1: We are more than sixty days since we sent that letter,
28:56
Speaker 1: and now in four days they turned around this request
29:02
Speaker 1: of a special interest group to the White House. We
29:06
Speaker 1: know they had worked together on this, but we do
29:10
Speaker 1: not know if someone in the White House wrote this letter,
29:14
Speaker 1: this memo, Iflica Monico wrote it, if this Scupta wrote it.
29:21
Speaker 1: We don't know who wrote the memo. But we know
29:25
Speaker 1: that Merrick Garland signed the memo, and you know he
29:29
Speaker 1: had said it first in the hearing, and this was
29:33
Speaker 1: one of the big contradictions. He said that he had
29:38
Speaker 1: done the memo based on the school board letter, but
29:42
Speaker 1: then in response to my question when I asked him later,
29:47
Speaker 1: I was further down to you. So I came in
29:49
Speaker 1: and I said, we want to know who wrote this
29:52
Speaker 1: memo and if in this memo you are indeed calling
29:58
Speaker 1: people a pair to be a domestic terrorist, labeling them
30:04
Speaker 1: as such. And he said, well, he did it from
30:07
Speaker 1: the memo and news report, so then he wouldn't identify
30:14
Speaker 1: what news reports. And that's the part is It's like, okay,
30:18
Speaker 1: so you're making policy, and just so people understand how
30:21
Speaker 1: quickly this happened and how insane this story is, because
30:25
Speaker 1: I've never seen the DOJ work this way. You literally
30:29
Speaker 1: have a memo that comes out from from a teacher's
30:31
Speaker 1: union saying we want you to stop these parents from
30:34
Speaker 1: getting involved, and we need you to start treating them
30:36
Speaker 1: like domestic terrorists, and we want you to use literally
30:39
Speaker 1: the laws that we use Patriot Act, et cetera, that
30:41
Speaker 1: we use after nine to eleven to target actual terrorists
30:45
Speaker 1: that were connected to al Qaeda to then go after parents.
30:49
Speaker 1: And then within days, basically within hours, you have the
30:54
Speaker 1: DOJ rolling out a policy and then a new memo says,
30:58
Speaker 1: here's thirteen ways you can basically parents up. That's right,
31:02
Speaker 1: And that was the US Attorney's memo. That was the
31:05
Speaker 1: follow on. So you know what we did was to
31:09
Speaker 1: make this point to them, to him that we wanted
31:14
Speaker 1: to see what these news reports are. So I said, well,
31:17
Speaker 1: why don't you do this. You go back, you compile it,
31:20
Speaker 1: and you send it to me in writing so that
31:23
Speaker 1: we have this for the record so we can see
31:26
Speaker 1: what you were looking at. That was so egregious that
31:29
Speaker 1: within four days, four days, you do this memo. The
31:34
Speaker 1: other thing been Mary Garland led the prosecution of Terry
31:41
Speaker 1: Nichols and Timothy McVey in the Oklahoma City bombings. So
31:45
Speaker 1: I asked him if he would classify parents in the
31:50
Speaker 1: same vein as Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, and he was, oh,
31:55
Speaker 1: my goodness, no, no, no, Well what had happened with
32:00
Speaker 1: Oklahoma City was they classified them as domestic terrorist. That
32:06
Speaker 1: NSBA memo talked about domestic terrorist in regard to people
32:14
Speaker 1: that are And I ask about this language practicing harassment, intimidation,
32:22
Speaker 1: and fear of violence. Now you can't sign onto a
32:29
Speaker 1: memo that is done in response to a letter and
32:35
Speaker 1: a complaint from a special interest group that uses the
32:40
Speaker 1: domestic terrorist activity term and not be in agreement with that.
32:48
Speaker 1: And of course then he's denying it because they say, well,
32:51
Speaker 1: the memo did not use the word domestic terrorists. Wink, wink,
32:57
Speaker 1: nod nod. You know, I remember after not and you
33:00
Speaker 1: remember US Attorney General John Ashcroft. John Ashcroft, who was
33:05
Speaker 1: dealing with the worst tears tack in US history, wasn't
33:09
Speaker 1: throwing around memos as quickly when we were literally under
33:13
Speaker 1: attack from al Qaeda as quickly as Garland was at
33:18
Speaker 1: parents because of the teachers Union and special interest groups saying,
33:22
Speaker 1: decide that they are we're going to treat them like
33:24
Speaker 1: terrorists and tell me how to prosecute them, and send
33:27
Speaker 1: it out a memo telling people how to prosecute them
33:29
Speaker 1: because they decide to organize on Facebook. Even after nine
33:33
Speaker 1: to eleven, you didn't see this type of reckless And
33:37
Speaker 1: if there was any time that I would argue have
33:39
Speaker 1: reckless behavior in a sense a paranoid, a freak out
33:42
Speaker 1: moment of send out a memo, send out a memo,
33:44
Speaker 1: send out a memo about these domestic terrorists in America.
33:47
Speaker 1: It would have been after nine to eleven, and even
33:49
Speaker 1: the Attorney General John Ashcroft at the time didn't do
33:51
Speaker 1: it as quickly as this guy is doing against parents
33:54
Speaker 1: going to school board meetings. Well, you're right about that,
33:59
Speaker 1: and it is a term that is a specific term,
34:05
Speaker 1: and to equate parents who are going to petition their government,
34:12
Speaker 1: which is their right to exercise their free speech, which
34:16
Speaker 1: is their right to hold accountable their elected officials, which
34:22
Speaker 1: is their right. All of this is it's just hard
34:29
Speaker 1: to even believe. I have never in my life seems
34:34
Speaker 1: something like this, And wherever I go in our wonderful state,
34:38
Speaker 1: then this is one of the first things that people
34:42
Speaker 1: talk about. How dare the DOJ try to have parents
34:47
Speaker 1: that go to a school board to ask about mask mandates,
34:52
Speaker 1: vaccine mandates, curriculum sixteen nineteen CRT, pornography in the a
35:00
Speaker 1: whole school library, and safety of children in school. And
35:08
Speaker 1: now we're finding out not one but two rights two
35:12
Speaker 1: have been covered up by school boards. And well, look
35:18
Speaker 1: at the latest story Center look at the latest story,
35:21
Speaker 1: and this is an example of what could happen to
35:23
Speaker 1: a parent very quickly. You have a high school student
35:25
Speaker 1: that's just broke this morning, that gave and I'm quoting,
35:28
Speaker 1: lap dances to staff, including the principle for the school's
35:33
Speaker 1: man pageant. There's now an investigation underway because parents have organized, right,
35:39
Speaker 1: and a student that was dressed in very little clothing
35:42
Speaker 1: gave lap dances as staff members, including the principal at
35:45
Speaker 1: a Kentucky public high school while girls dressed as Hooters
35:48
Speaker 1: waitresses during homecoming week activities Tuesday. This has all been
35:52
Speaker 1: reported by the local news. The paper added that quote
35:56
Speaker 1: investigation is underway to figure out what went down as
35:59
Speaker 1: part of the Hazard High schools man pageant and costume day.
36:04
Speaker 1: The papers said parents organized. So my question for you
36:07
Speaker 1: centers this, if parents organized against this school right for
36:12
Speaker 1: allowing this happen, go to the school board and lose
36:14
Speaker 1: their minds or make phone calls to their school representatives
36:18
Speaker 1: or the principal or the school itself, are they going
36:21
Speaker 1: to be treated like domestic terrists. Based on what I
36:24
Speaker 1: understand from Garland yesterday, and you're questioning of him at
36:27
Speaker 1: this point, his memo, which has not been retracted. These
36:31
Speaker 1: parents could still be prosecuted under up more than a
36:34
Speaker 1: dozen different ways as some sort of threat to society
36:38
Speaker 1: for being angry that students were giving lap dance as
36:41
Speaker 1: a staff and the principle of a school. That's right,
36:46
Speaker 1: And you know, I asked him several other committee members
36:50
Speaker 1: to ask him if he planned to retract at memo
36:53
Speaker 1: because the NSBA had come at their staff and the
36:57
Speaker 1: board had retracted their memo to the White House. And
37:04
Speaker 1: he says, no, they're not going to do it. But Ben,
37:07
Speaker 1: bear in mind, what are they trying to do. They
37:11
Speaker 1: want government control of your kids, they're doing it through
37:15
Speaker 1: this memo. They want government control of your healthcare, which
37:20
Speaker 1: is this vaccine. They want government control of your checking
37:25
Speaker 1: account and your income, which they're doing through the taxes,
37:30
Speaker 1: prepaying taxes on money you haven't made, and they're also
37:34
Speaker 1: doing it through surveilling your checking account. It is cradle
37:39
Speaker 1: to grave, daylight to dark. This is a bunch of socialists.
37:44
Speaker 1: They thought they were going to radically transform this country
37:47
Speaker 1: for when Barack Obama was president, and thank god we
37:52
Speaker 1: got Donald Trump and they didn't get a third term
37:56
Speaker 1: of Barack Obama with Hillary Clinton. But now they are
38:00
Speaker 1: held bent on doing this. They don't give a ripping
38:04
Speaker 1: flip about your children, about your life, about your job anything.
38:11
Speaker 1: Now they want is a socialist nation with them in control.
38:16
Speaker 1: And you're going to be the peasants and the peons
38:19
Speaker 1: to give them the lifestyle they want at your expense.
38:23
Speaker 1: Last question, and I'm going to switch gears here, but
38:25
Speaker 1: it's an important one. There was a question asked the
38:28
Speaker 1: Attorney General from you guys yesterday about doctor Fauci and
38:33
Speaker 1: is he being investigated for lying to Congress? How did
38:36
Speaker 1: he answer that question? Well, he is an uninvestigating doctor
38:41
Speaker 1: Fauchi because he doesn't think he lied to Congress. But
38:45
Speaker 1: there are plenty of us who are looking at different
38:48
Speaker 1: components of what Fauschi has done. And of course I
38:51
Speaker 1: have been calling for a WU on lab investigations in
38:55
Speaker 1: today one and I was joined Ron Johnson and some
39:00
Speaker 1: other Rand Paul have joined me in this call. Secretary
39:06
Speaker 1: Pompeo tried to do this. You had career career, yourecrats
39:13
Speaker 1: over as the State department that blocked it. But you
39:16
Speaker 1: know what, the layers are peeling back on this smelly
39:22
Speaker 1: onion and what we're going to do is continue to push.
39:27
Speaker 1: I think people have about had it. They finally realize
39:31
Speaker 1: that what they got with Joe Biden is not what
39:36
Speaker 1: they thought they were going to get with Joe Biden.
39:40
Speaker 1: And people are very fearful of what is happening to
39:44
Speaker 1: this country and how quickly they are trying to from
39:49
Speaker 1: the inside overthrow this government. Senator, I really appreciate you
39:54
Speaker 1: coming on, and I'll say this again to everybody listening,
39:57
Speaker 1: please share this podcast ass with your family and friends.
40:02
Speaker 1: Hit that little forward arrow and share it. Second thing,
40:05
Speaker 1: make sure you hit subscribe or auto download our podcast
40:09
Speaker 1: so that you can get it each and every day.
40:12
Speaker 1: It's free. All you gotta do is hit subscribe or
40:15
Speaker 1: auto download, depending on what it says on the app
40:17
Speaker 1: that you're using right now. And if you would give
40:21
Speaker 1: us an extra thirty seconds and write us a five
40:24
Speaker 1: star review, it helps tremendously on the podcast charts so
40:28
Speaker 1: that we can reach more people when you write us
40:30
Speaker 1: a review. Thank you guys, see you back here tomorrow.