Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / White House WILL NOT Say Whether or Not Cocaine Belonged to Joe or Hunter Biden!

Transcript

White House WILL NOT Say Whether or Not Cocaine Belonged to Joe or Hunter Biden! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: James Comer is going to begin deposing Biden business associates.
0:05
Speaker 2: He has now confirmed this.
0:07
Speaker 1: The House Oversight Committee is set to begin deposing the
0:11
Speaker 1: Biden crime family business associates in the coming weeks and months,
0:16
Speaker 1: the chairman, James Comer, has now said publicly. Comer said
0:21
Speaker 1: Devin Archer, one of Hunter Biden's top associates, will be
0:26
Speaker 1: the first member to pose to unravel the family's international
0:30
Speaker 1: business schemes. A source with knowledge of the committee's schedule
0:36
Speaker 1: has confirmed that Archer's lawyers are in contact with the
0:40
Speaker 1: committee about scheduling the interview in mid June. The committee
0:45
Speaker 1: subpoena to Devon Archer to appear before it on June
0:48
Speaker 1: the nineteenth. A source familiar with the situations confirmed that
0:52
Speaker 1: he negotiated a later deposition date, saying, quote, we are
0:57
Speaker 1: entering the deposition phase about this ongoing investigation into the Bidens.
1:04
Speaker 1: Lawmakers conceivably have about twelve months left to investigate the
1:09
Speaker 1: family shitty business deals. His campaign season in the summer
1:12
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty four will likely become the priority in Washington,
1:16
Speaker 1: d c. Quote, we will have Devin Archer, the first
1:20
Speaker 1: person who was involved in the Hunter Biden business dealings.
1:23
Speaker 1: He will be the first person we deposed. Comber said,
1:27
Speaker 1: we have a list of who's who's that we're involved
1:30
Speaker 1: in the Biden organization that we plan on deposing throughout
1:34
Speaker 1: the summer. Now you may not know this, so I'll
1:37
Speaker 1: remind you. Devin Archer was Hunter Biden's quote best friend
1:41
Speaker 1: in business quote unquote. He got in major legal trouble
1:46
Speaker 1: just last year in twenty twenty two for defrauding a
1:50
Speaker 1: Native American tribal entity. The court ordered him to pay
1:55
Speaker 1: forty three million, nine hundred and fifty four thousand in
2:00
Speaker 1: four hundred and sixteen dollars and seventy five cents in
2:03
Speaker 1: a judgment to the Native American victims. Prior to his arrest,
2:09
Speaker 1: Devin Archer served in twenty fourteen with Hunter Biden on
2:14
Speaker 1: the board of Barisma, that Ukrainian based energy company whose
2:18
Speaker 1: executive allegedly bribed not only Hunter Biden with five million dollars,
2:25
Speaker 1: but with the President of the United States of America
2:27
Speaker 1: Joe Biden with his five million dollars for himself as well.
2:31
Speaker 1: Photographers infamously photographed Devin Archer playing golf with Hunter Biden
2:36
Speaker 1: and then Vice President Joe Biden in Southampton, New York,
2:41
Speaker 1: which was the first picture to confirm clearly that the
2:44
Speaker 1: President of the United States of America was lying to
2:47
Speaker 1: us when he said he never discussed any of his
2:50
Speaker 1: business decisions with his son or anything about business with
2:55
Speaker 1: his brother or any other family member.
2:58
Speaker 2: Clearly that was a lie.
3:00
Speaker 1: The photo was the first photo to raise questions regarding
3:03
Speaker 1: the extent to which Joe Biden was aware not only
3:07
Speaker 1: of his son's overseas business deals, but how involved he
3:10
Speaker 1: actually was. Remember, he was never forced to discuss any
3:15
Speaker 1: of that. When he ran for president, the media covered
3:18
Speaker 1: for him. Devin Archer was by Hunter Biden's side for
3:22
Speaker 1: decades in the business deals. They knew each other for
3:26
Speaker 1: quite some time. They attended Yale together in the late
3:28
Speaker 1: nineteen nineties. Archer went on to become the vice chairman
3:33
Speaker 1: of finance for John Carey's failed two thousand and four
3:37
Speaker 1: presidential campaign. Many people didn't know that he was connected
3:42
Speaker 1: with his college classmate, Chris Hines. That would be Kerrie's
3:45
Speaker 1: step son. Now a lot of people don't realize that
3:48
Speaker 1: John Carey's step son, Chris Hines, was another Biden family
3:53
Speaker 1: business partner. That we would expect to be deposed.
3:57
Speaker 2: Now.
3:57
Speaker 1: Archer is not the only associate James Comer has subpoena.
4:02
Speaker 1: The committee has not publicly produced any results of those subpoenas,
4:06
Speaker 1: but we do know that in May, Comber said the
4:09
Speaker 1: Biden family members will quote more than likely receive subpoenas.
4:13
Speaker 1: We're gonna call Hunter Biden, James Biden, the other Biden
4:16
Speaker 1: crime family members who are on the take here. There's
4:19
Speaker 1: a reason why they're playing it this way. They want
4:21
Speaker 1: to get all these other people on the record first.
4:23
Speaker 1: They know what questions to ask the Bidens. Clearly there's
4:26
Speaker 1: a strategy here that is playing out now. All this
4:30
Speaker 1: is happening as the White House has now officially refused
4:35
Speaker 1: to say whether or not the cocaine found at the
4:39
Speaker 1: White House over the weekend, it is a crime scene
4:41
Speaker 1: at the White House belong to Joe or Hunter Biden.
4:46
Speaker 2: That's right.
4:47
Speaker 1: The White House Deputy pre Secretary Andrew Bates could not say,
4:51
Speaker 1: quote he is citing the Hatch Act. Quote are you
4:56
Speaker 1: willing to say that that's not the case? That it
4:59
Speaker 1: the cooke doesn't belong to them? A reporter asked Baits
5:03
Speaker 1: aboard Air Force one quote, I don't have a response
5:07
Speaker 1: to that, because we have to be careful about.
5:09
Speaker 2: The Hatch Act, he claimed.
5:12
Speaker 1: The reporter did not follow up with Baits on how
5:14
Speaker 1: the Hatch Act would apply to this situation.
5:17
Speaker 2: Now.
5:17
Speaker 1: The Hatch Act's main provision blocks Executive Branch employees from
5:21
Speaker 1: engaging in partisan political activity while on duty in a
5:26
Speaker 1: federal facility or using federal property. According to the Justice Department,
5:31
Speaker 1: what I will say is that I've noticed there does
5:35
Speaker 1: seem to be some increasing frustration coming from that corner
5:39
Speaker 1: in general, and I think it is probably included in
5:44
Speaker 1: the contrast between their substances and their policy records. Baits
5:48
Speaker 1: tried to change the subject. Obviously, that made no sense
5:51
Speaker 1: at all. What's absurd about this is that the idea
5:55
Speaker 1: of the Hatch Act would somehow be involved here is
5:57
Speaker 1: maybe the most ridiculous thing I've ever It actually doesn't
6:01
Speaker 1: even make sense. Now we have the audio from the
6:05
Speaker 1: press gaggle aboard Air Force one en route to South Carolina.
6:09
Speaker 1: You're gonna hear it in the background. Listen carefully, well
6:12
Speaker 1: one more, you know, President for President Trump has made
6:15
Speaker 1: some pretty wild posts recently on social media.
6:18
Speaker 3: One of them was that the cocaine found the White
6:21
Speaker 3: House was had belonged to either the President or his son.
6:25
Speaker 2: Are you willing to.
6:25
Speaker 1: Say that that's not the case, that they don't belong
6:28
Speaker 1: to them.
6:29
Speaker 4: I don't have a response to that, because we have
6:33
Speaker 4: to be careful about the Hatch Act. What I will
6:37
Speaker 4: say is that I have noticed there does seem to
6:40
Speaker 4: be some increasing frustration coming from that corner in general,
6:45
Speaker 4: and I think it is probably rooted in the contrast
6:48
Speaker 4: between their substantive policy records.
6:53
Speaker 2: That literally makes no sense.
6:55
Speaker 1: It's almost that's like a response you would get if
6:57
Speaker 1: you were on cocaine. A second report, ask the White
7:00
Speaker 1: House if they would comment on this or even if
7:05
Speaker 1: they would commit to transparency. If the Secret Service discovered
7:08
Speaker 1: who smuggled the cocaine the White House, if the Secret
7:12
Speaker 1: Service is able to determine the individuals and individual responsible,
7:16
Speaker 1: will the White House commit to transparency in this and
7:19
Speaker 1: making that information public? The reporter asked, listen to the
7:23
Speaker 1: White House's response.
7:24
Speaker 5: To that cocaine. I understand the Secret Service is conducting
7:29
Speaker 5: an investigation. If the Secret Service is able to determine
7:34
Speaker 5: the individual responsible, will the Secret Service in the and
7:37
Speaker 5: will the White House commit to transparency in this and
7:40
Speaker 5: making that information public.
7:42
Speaker 4: I'm going to defer to the Secret Service professionals who
7:45
Speaker 4: are carrying this out. I'm just not going to engage
7:47
Speaker 4: on hypotheticals about it. I would suggest you contact them
7:51
Speaker 4: for anything more.
7:53
Speaker 1: Again, the biggest load of crap answer that you can
7:56
Speaker 1: give this is a mid level Biden staffer. Can you
8:00
Speaker 1: imagine if that's how they downgraded you, like the White
8:02
Speaker 1: House is telling you this mid level. Like, imagine if
8:05
Speaker 1: you see your name in lights and they're referring to
8:07
Speaker 1: you as mid level because they're trying to diminish Andrew
8:09
Speaker 1: Bates saying, oh, it's a mid level guy, right. This
8:12
Speaker 1: is how this is how non serious we are about this. Now,
8:15
Speaker 1: the question serious right if the Secret Service determines the
8:18
Speaker 1: individual responsible, and I want to be clear about this,
8:21
Speaker 1: I have no doubt they know who did this.
8:23
Speaker 2: I've been in the White House.
8:25
Speaker 1: I've been lucky enough to go in the White House
8:27
Speaker 1: quite a few times in my life, and the idea
8:31
Speaker 1: that this is would be hard to figure out is
8:33
Speaker 1: totally absurd. I want to also be clear about that
8:38
Speaker 1: they know who brought this in there. I have no
8:40
Speaker 1: doubt if this was anthrax or something else. The person
8:43
Speaker 1: would have already been apprehended and arrested. This would have
8:46
Speaker 1: been and charged. Okay, I want to also make that
8:49
Speaker 1: very very very very clear. I have no doubt that
8:55
Speaker 1: the cameras picked up who it is and they figured
8:58
Speaker 1: it out. Now, I actually believe there's a very good
9:01
Speaker 1: chance this was not Hunter Biden, based on when they
9:04
Speaker 1: found it. I believe there's a good chances could have
9:07
Speaker 1: just been these types of people that work at the
9:10
Speaker 1: White House who basically think that the rules don't apply
9:13
Speaker 1: to them. And if you look at this administration, you
9:15
Speaker 1: look at this White House, it makes sense that they
9:17
Speaker 1: would have a a bunch of druggies around, right, a
9:20
Speaker 1: bunch of coke heads around doing blow. I think there's
9:23
Speaker 1: a very good chance, as the staffer, they probably were
9:26
Speaker 1: out the night before, or they were going out that night,
9:29
Speaker 1: they needed their cocaine with them, and they decided to
9:32
Speaker 1: bring it to the White House. Now, is there a chance,
9:34
Speaker 1: of course, of the drug use of Hunter Biden that
9:35
Speaker 1: in theory could be his, Yes, but I'm not obsessed
9:38
Speaker 1: with that story. What I'm upset about is the fact
9:40
Speaker 1: that the White House, I'm sure has figured this out
9:43
Speaker 1: they know whose drugs it is.
9:48
Speaker 2: They know whose drugs this is.
9:52
Speaker 1: I did outnumber yesterday and I was sitting there with
9:55
Speaker 1: former White House Press secretary on the panel with me
9:58
Speaker 1: as well, Kaylee mckenennie, and she said, no way Hunter
10:01
Speaker 1: Biden was a source of cocaine at the White House.
10:04
Speaker 1: She dismissed the idea that the cocaine found at the
10:06
Speaker 1: White House belonged to President Joe Biden's son.
10:09
Speaker 2: She said, quote camp David, there is no way it.
10:15
Speaker 1: Is conceivable to think cocaine could sit for a seventy
10:17
Speaker 1: two hour period, So I would rule him out at
10:20
Speaker 1: this point.
10:22
Speaker 2: She's probably right.
10:24
Speaker 1: It's probably a staff member either doing blow at the
10:27
Speaker 1: White House or was taking it in advance. Regardless, the
10:30
Speaker 1: fact that you felt comfortable enough to bring a hardcore drug,
10:35
Speaker 1: cocaine into the White House tells you everything you need
10:40
Speaker 1: to know about this White House. This is who's running
10:45
Speaker 1: the country. I also would make this point, I don't
10:48
Speaker 1: believe the presidents run the country. You look at the stumbles,
10:51
Speaker 1: you look at the gaps, you look at the schedule
10:54
Speaker 1: of this president. It's pretty clear he's not running this administration.
11:00
Speaker 1: What concerns me is could there be a cooke head
11:02
Speaker 1: at the high level in this White House who clearly
11:05
Speaker 1: has significant influence on this White House? Is there a
11:09
Speaker 1: chance that that individual at the White House is doing
11:13
Speaker 1: drugs with other people at the White House who are
11:16
Speaker 1: making massive policy decisions for the United States of America.
11:20
Speaker 1: That is the question that people should be asking. And
11:23
Speaker 1: why are they protecting that staffer? I have no doubt
11:27
Speaker 1: they know at this point who did it, What are
11:30
Speaker 1: they hiding and what employee are they protecting.
11:34
Speaker 2: Let me also say something else.
11:37
Speaker 1: Experts are baffled by the White House invoking the Hatchac
11:41
Speaker 1: to dodge questions about this cocaine. Even a democratic ethics
11:46
Speaker 1: experts say, if Biden campaign staffer were high as a kite,
11:50
Speaker 1: the Hatchac would not cover the cocaine in question.
11:53
Speaker 2: The idea they.
11:54
Speaker 1: Thought that that respond so I can't talk about this
11:58
Speaker 1: because the hatch At act is a served. Experts who
12:03
Speaker 1: understand the hatch Act understand that invoking the Hatchac when
12:08
Speaker 1: asked whether President Biden or his son owned the cocaine
12:11
Speaker 1: found the White House truly is a middle finger to
12:14
Speaker 1: every single American. That's something we need to understand. And
12:20
Speaker 1: when you have the White House Deputy pre Seretery Andrew
12:23
Speaker 1: Bates as being asked during this press gaggle whether the
12:26
Speaker 1: president can deny that he or his son owned the
12:29
Speaker 1: cocaine found the White House, and then he says, I
12:31
Speaker 1: can't answer that question. Come on, really, I don't have
12:36
Speaker 1: a response to that because we have to be careful
12:38
Speaker 1: about the Hatchac.
12:39
Speaker 2: That's your response.
12:40
Speaker 1: And the media, by the way, went along with It's
12:42
Speaker 1: like they're like, all right, we asked the question, We're
12:43
Speaker 1: gonna move on now, we asked the question.
12:48
Speaker 2: We can check that box.
12:51
Speaker 1: And then Bates compared Biden's policy record to his predecessor's record.
12:57
Speaker 2: No, they're not the same, folks.
13:01
Speaker 1: There was never a time that cocaine was found at
13:03
Speaker 1: the White House when Donald Trump was there. Then they
13:05
Speaker 1: said we got to invoke the Hatchac. That has nothing
13:07
Speaker 1: to do with answering the damn question. Attorney Bradley Moss
13:13
Speaker 1: said this, he is candidly at loss as to why
13:17
Speaker 1: mister Bates believe the hatjack is relevant with respect to
13:20
Speaker 1: addressing that question.
13:22
Speaker 2: Quote.
13:22
Speaker 1: I could envision other legitimate basis for declining to respond,
13:26
Speaker 1: such as respecting the integrity of an ongoing investigation, but
13:29
Speaker 1: to reference a hatjack seems misplaced. Former Bush Administration Ethics
13:36
Speaker 1: chief chief Richard Paynter, who ran for Congress as a
13:39
Speaker 1: Democrat last cycle, said he was said this quote, given
13:46
Speaker 1: lectures at the White House and published articles on the
13:49
Speaker 1: Hatch Act, but the bill does not cover snorting cocaine,
13:54
Speaker 1: referring to the hatchjack being important again, saying it doesn't
13:57
Speaker 1: cover snorting campaign. What the blank does the hatjack have
14:01
Speaker 1: to do with cocaine? Question mark? This is the most
14:05
Speaker 1: ridiculous invocation of the Hatch Act.
14:08
Speaker 2: I've ever seen.
14:10
Speaker 1: Painter add that even if someone on Biden's campaign were
14:13
Speaker 1: high as a kite, the hat jack would not cover
14:15
Speaker 1: the cocaine in question. Yeah, very odd the Baits would
14:22
Speaker 1: pivot to the hatch Act and doesn't deny that the
14:26
Speaker 1: president or the son, the first sons, that this cocaine
14:31
Speaker 1: was connected them, because wouldn't you want to get that
14:33
Speaker 1: out there right? If you know that this isn't their cocaine,
14:38
Speaker 1: wouldn't you immediately say, Hey, this cocaine found the White
14:42
Speaker 1: House does not belong to you, the president or son.
14:44
Speaker 1: That's the question they're asking, right, does it? You would
14:47
Speaker 1: immediately say it does not right you would immediately say
14:53
Speaker 1: that that they are not on drugs. And the famous
14:59
Speaker 1: Hatch Act you may have heard about this before, this
15:02
Speaker 1: provision which does it doesn't allow you to say you
15:05
Speaker 1: know what, It doesn't allow you to say what the
15:09
Speaker 1: White House said. The Hatch Act doesn't say or say
15:15
Speaker 1: to the people at the White House. Hay, you can't
15:17
Speaker 1: answer the question if cocaine belongs to the president or
15:20
Speaker 1: his son. That is insane. So it brings up the
15:24
Speaker 1: question of okay, well is it the president's cocaine? Is
15:28
Speaker 1: it the first son's cocaine? Why wouldn't you answer the
15:31
Speaker 1: question say it's not it's not their cocaine, it's not
15:36
Speaker 1: their cocaine. Let's talk about a great opportunity for your ira.
15:41
Speaker 1: In four a one ks you can get free gold
15:45
Speaker 1: just by learning about gold iras from Augusta Precious Medals.
15:48
Speaker 1: It's important that you know what's going on in this
15:50
Speaker 1: crazy economy and your hard earned savings, the protecting from
15:54
Speaker 1: the devalued dollar, especially if you're close to retirement. Augusta
15:58
Speaker 1: Precious Medals will give you information on how to protect
16:00
Speaker 1: your savings and open a gold ira. So if you've
16:03
Speaker 1: saved at least one hundred thousand for retirement. Call and
16:06
Speaker 1: ask about their ultimate guide to gold iras. I trust
16:10
Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Metals and you can too. They will make
16:13
Speaker 1: sure that you understand what is best for you and
16:16
Speaker 1: your portfolio. There's a reason Money magazine says they are
16:19
Speaker 1: the best gold IRA company. Get free, goal free information
16:24
Speaker 1: and retirement protection now by calling eight seven seven four
16:28
Speaker 1: gold IRA. That's eight seven seven the number four GOLDRA
16:33
Speaker 1: or Augusta Precious Medals dot com.
16:36
Speaker 2: There's also another.
16:37
Speaker 1: Aspect to this story, and that is the media giving
16:41
Speaker 1: up and accepting the no answers from this White House.
16:45
Speaker 1: If this was another administration, if this was during the
16:48
Speaker 1: Bill Clinton years, if this was even during the Obama years,
16:51
Speaker 1: there is no way the lack of information we've been
16:54
Speaker 1: given by this White House would be accepted by immedia.
16:56
Speaker 1: Finding cocaine in the White House is a big deal.
16:58
Speaker 1: Having a U addict son who's there within hours of
17:03
Speaker 1: that cocaine is a big deal, the White House saying,
17:06
Speaker 1: refusing to say whether this cocaine was the president's or
17:10
Speaker 1: the president's son or not, refusing to say this isn't
17:13
Speaker 1: our cocaine would have been a massive deal with this media,
17:18
Speaker 1: the Secret Service and the investigation having no answers walk
17:22
Speaker 1: up to that podium and the White House presidcretory having
17:24
Speaker 1: no answers to basic questions about the investigation. How the
17:28
Speaker 1: White House was even asked this simple question? You ready
17:31
Speaker 1: for this question? They were asked one of the questions
17:33
Speaker 1: that they were asked, just so you know. One of
17:36
Speaker 1: the questions was will you pledge not only to fire
17:42
Speaker 1: the person if they're on staff who brought the cocaine in?
17:45
Speaker 2: Right, like would you fire them?
17:47
Speaker 1: But also will you prosecute or will you call for
17:50
Speaker 1: the prosecution of the person that brought this illegal drugs
17:52
Speaker 1: into the White House. They won't even answer that question,
17:56
Speaker 1: probably because they already know who it is and whoever
17:59
Speaker 1: it is don't want to be prosecuted, and whoever it is,
18:01
Speaker 1: they don't want to be fired. So if you don't
18:04
Speaker 1: want them to be fired, right, and you need them
18:09
Speaker 1: on your staff and they're high level staff, or there's
18:11
Speaker 1: others there. The other question was about drug testing, Like
18:14
Speaker 1: they've been asked a simple question on drug testing, like, hey,
18:16
Speaker 1: would you drug test your staff? Are you going to
18:18
Speaker 1: drug test your staff to make sure won't answer that
18:21
Speaker 1: damn question either. Refusing to answer those questions is very telling.
18:28
Speaker 1: Judge Janine, by the way, had this to say about
18:31
Speaker 1: it last night on how this is playing out and
18:34
Speaker 1: a FOIA requests the Freedom of Information Act requests for
18:37
Speaker 1: visitor at logs and surveillance tapes in the White House,
18:40
Speaker 1: in other words, saying, what are they hiding?
18:42
Speaker 2: Listen?
18:42
Speaker 6: So this entrance isn't accessible to everyday people. It seems
18:48
Speaker 6: like you need to be someone pretty special to be
18:51
Speaker 6: where these drugs were found near the Situation Room. That's
18:56
Speaker 6: where they hold all the National Security Council meetings. Heads
19:00
Speaker 6: of the DoD ciadj all come in and out of there.
19:05
Speaker 6: So why is none of this adding up? The White
19:10
Speaker 6: House is already trying to slow walk the idea of
19:14
Speaker 6: a potential prosecution.
19:17
Speaker 7: If the Secret Service determines who brought the cocaine into
19:22
Speaker 7: the White House, does the White House support the prosecution
19:25
Speaker 7: of this individual? I'm just not going to get into
19:27
Speaker 7: hypotheticals from here.
19:30
Speaker 6: What are they trying to hide? Why? So Secretive Prime
19:35
Speaker 6: Time has filed a foyer request with the White House
19:38
Speaker 6: asking for the visitor logs and surveialance tapes from the
19:42
Speaker 6: White House. If they're not interested in getting to the
19:45
Speaker 6: bottom of this, we will because without answers, people are
19:49
Speaker 6: going to immediately think Hunter is behind this. Now, come on,
19:55
Speaker 6: we know Hunter has a long history as a drug addict.
19:59
Speaker 2: Could this co be his?
20:01
Speaker 6: And a major condition of his plea deal was keeping
20:05
Speaker 6: his nose clean and staying away from drugs. So is
20:10
Speaker 6: the White House trying to shield Hunter? We know the
20:14
Speaker 6: Secret Service has a history of protecting him from trouble.
20:19
Speaker 3: One of the things that Hunter Biden said guilty on
20:21
Speaker 3: was illegal possession of a firearm. We have reports that
20:24
Speaker 3: the Secret Service went and tried to talk to the
20:27
Speaker 3: firearms dealer to find out who he had notified. And
20:31
Speaker 3: we're snooping around with that. That's concerning Jason because at
20:34
Speaker 3: that particular time, Joe Biden didn't have Secret Service protection.
20:39
Speaker 6: And if Hunter gets one strike during his plea deal,
20:42
Speaker 6: it could be game over for him. So is the
20:46
Speaker 6: Secret Service sticking their neck out to protect Hunter? And
20:50
Speaker 6: will Joe finally give us a straight answer?
21:00
Speaker 1: Because I want to go back to what are they
21:03
Speaker 1: trying to hide the fact that we're having to do
21:06
Speaker 1: a Foyer requests? They are because the media won't do
21:09
Speaker 1: their job, and they're doing everything they can to protect
21:12
Speaker 1: I think tells you everything. Stephen Miller, who she mentioned
21:17
Speaker 1: there at the very end. One of the things that
21:19
Speaker 1: Stephen Miller said in his interview with her is when
21:23
Speaker 1: you go in the West Wing, there are a million
21:26
Speaker 1: eyes on you. You worked in the Trump administration, he would know.
21:31
Speaker 8: I would just put it this way. Nobody is going
21:34
Speaker 8: into the West Wing of the White House without a
21:37
Speaker 8: million eyes being on you. This is one of the
21:39
Speaker 8: most secure facilities in the face of the earth. You
21:43
Speaker 8: were only steps away from the Oval Office, You're only
21:46
Speaker 8: steps away from the Situation Room, You're only steps away
21:49
Speaker 8: from the offices of the National Security Advisor and many
21:53
Speaker 8: other of the highest ranking officers in the US government.
21:56
Speaker 1: You know who did it, is what he's saying. You
21:59
Speaker 1: know White House, you know Secret Service. And if this
22:02
Speaker 1: was a Thank goodness, it wasn't. But if this would
22:04
Speaker 1: have been anthrax or something like that, we would already
22:08
Speaker 1: have these questions answered. They would have already arrested who
22:14
Speaker 1: it was. They had to evacuate the White House. Can
22:18
Speaker 1: we also not forget that? Okay? Can we not forget this?
22:23
Speaker 2: Right? We already know this like we.
22:29
Speaker 1: Know it, and yet they're like, all right, let's move
22:32
Speaker 1: on yesterday saying he's going to declare victory on the
22:36
Speaker 1: economy when we have all time high mortgage rates under
22:41
Speaker 1: this present that have just hit.
22:42
Speaker 2: And what does he say?
22:43
Speaker 1: He says this yesterday, because hey, when the game is rigged,
22:47
Speaker 1: you don't have to live by the same rules as others,
22:50
Speaker 1: so you can go out there and say ridiculous things
22:52
Speaker 1: like this.
22:53
Speaker 7: I'm not here to declare victory on the economy. I'm
22:57
Speaker 7: here to say we have a plan this turning thing
23:00
Speaker 7: around quickly.
23:01
Speaker 2: Oh wait, I'm confused.
23:02
Speaker 1: Just a few days ago you said that you'd won
23:05
Speaker 1: and the economy was strong, and that you lowered the
23:07
Speaker 1: deficit by trillions of dollars. So which one is it,
23:10
Speaker 1: mister president, Because a couple days ago you said the
23:12
Speaker 1: opposite of what you just said. Is it because they said, hey,
23:16
Speaker 1: miss President, you can't walk out there today and say
23:18
Speaker 1: what you said two days ago because interest rates have
23:20
Speaker 1: skyrocketed now on home loans and people are suffering right
23:24
Speaker 1: now and inflation is still high.
23:28
Speaker 2: I'm just I'm just concerned here.
23:32
Speaker 1: Or maybe could it be that the Biden administration has
23:36
Speaker 1: abused national security tools to control political speech of their opponents,
23:43
Speaker 1: and you needed another headline to get over that because
23:46
Speaker 1: you had a massive ruling that came down, a ruling
23:49
Speaker 1: that we mentioned yesterday, a ruling that said that the
23:53
Speaker 1: White House needs to stop contacting private businesses to silence
23:57
Speaker 1: and censor people, which will have a massive impact on
24:01
Speaker 1: this new presidential election coming up. Daily and weekly and
24:06
Speaker 1: monthly meetings, bi weekly meetings with big tech. This White
24:10
Speaker 1: House could walk in and go, hey, here's a list
24:11
Speaker 1: of people we want you to silence and censor and
24:13
Speaker 1: shut up this week. Here's the accounts we want you
24:16
Speaker 1: to get suspended. Here are the counts that are bothering
24:18
Speaker 1: us and our nuisance to us, and we want to
24:20
Speaker 1: make sure that you silence and censor them. John Ratcliffe,
24:23
Speaker 1: the former Trump director of National Intelligence, had this to
24:27
Speaker 1: say about that big victory. So maybe that's why the
24:29
Speaker 1: president's changing his tune on the economy or won't answer
24:32
Speaker 1: a question on whose cocaine it was.
24:34
Speaker 7: I think the problem is going forward is because you've
24:38
Speaker 7: seen this abuse of these important intelligence and surveillance tools
24:44
Speaker 7: and putting political objectives in front of national security. They've
24:49
Speaker 7: jeopardized those. So let me give you an example. As
24:51
Speaker 7: the Director of National Intelligence, as you talked about, one
24:54
Speaker 7: of the things that I did was on a daily basis,
24:57
Speaker 7: prepared the President's Daily Brief. That's the collection and aggregation
25:00
Speaker 7: of our most sensitive intelligence to brief the president on
25:04
Speaker 7: national security concerns. One of the tools that we use
25:07
Speaker 7: there was section seven oh two of the Foreign Intelligence
25:10
Speaker 7: Surveillance Also that's the same tool that was abused to
25:19
Speaker 7: spy on the Trump campaign. And so now when seven
25:22
Speaker 7: oh two comes up for renewal at the end of
25:24
Speaker 7: this year, you have Republicans saying we can't renew that
25:27
Speaker 7: in its current form because it's been abused for political reasons.
25:31
Speaker 7: And so the abuses, these Orwellian abuses that I think
25:35
Speaker 7: the judge correctly characterized, have really placed our national security
25:40
Speaker 7: at risk. By these officials putting political objectives above America's
25:45
Speaker 7: national security posture is just incredibly dangerous.
25:47
Speaker 4: Yeah, but you believe they really need that surveillance capability,
25:50
Speaker 4: but it shouldn't extend to every American who is contact
25:53
Speaker 4: with a foreigner.
25:54
Speaker 7: John, These are legitimate national security intelligence tools that, when
25:59
Speaker 7: you properly help us to collect intelligence on our adversaries
26:04
Speaker 7: that mean to do us harm. But as we've seen
26:06
Speaker 7: and we've talked about the problem here is that they
26:08
Speaker 7: have been abused turn inward on American citizens to spy
26:12
Speaker 7: on them and to use it for political gain and
26:14
Speaker 7: to control and censor political speech.
26:17
Speaker 1: Control and censor political speech. He's exactly right if you
26:23
Speaker 1: think there's not two different systems of justice in this country,
26:26
Speaker 1: one for the woke liberals and the Biden administration and
26:29
Speaker 1: for every other American. You're not paying attention if you
26:33
Speaker 1: don't think that this administration is the only administration history
26:38
Speaker 1: that get away with not answering questions about who's cocaine
26:40
Speaker 1: it is, you're not paying attention when I say that
26:45
Speaker 1: the only ones that can get away with this. Let
26:47
Speaker 1: me give you the example just to confirm that point
26:51
Speaker 1: I just made. MSNBC has come out in front of
26:54
Speaker 1: the White House and they have said this about the
26:58
Speaker 1: possibility of finding out who brought the cocaine into the
27:02
Speaker 1: White House.
27:02
Speaker 2: Listen carefully.
27:04
Speaker 1: They're going to say expectations are being lowered about an
27:08
Speaker 1: eventual conclusion as to who brought cocaine to the White House.
27:12
Speaker 2: They're going to tell you that to your face. Listen.
27:15
Speaker 9: And the key thing is that multiple officials are cautioning
27:19
Speaker 9: that it is unlikely and certainly possible that there would
27:24
Speaker 9: be a resolution to this, meaning forensic evidence found that
27:28
Speaker 9: could identify an individual scanning the video doing the testing.
27:33
Speaker 9: But they are preparing us for a result that will
27:36
Speaker 9: be no conclusive evidence found, and that is still subject
27:41
Speaker 9: to change as the work continues. But that should give
27:44
Speaker 9: people a sense of where this is. They are looking
27:47
Speaker 9: at what's available. They're saying it's a very small bag,
27:51
Speaker 9: limited ability to test it because as tests are done,
27:53
Speaker 9: whether it's DNA or fingerprinting or other scientific type processes
27:58
Speaker 9: in the lab, you further degrade that sample, making it
28:01
Speaker 9: harder to get information from it. And of course they're
28:04
Speaker 9: scanning the videos. This was found in a cubby off
28:08
Speaker 9: of the lobby area of that pathway in and as
28:12
Speaker 9: you know, often security cameras and so forth, they're getting
28:15
Speaker 9: the big wide areas, and an official said a camera
28:18
Speaker 9: would have had to have been trained in on the
28:20
Speaker 9: cubbies and be able to see from the right angle
28:23
Speaker 9: and individual dropping that packet. So expectations are being lowered
28:28
Speaker 9: about an eventual conclusion here that would lead to an
28:32
Speaker 9: identity and then even the potential for prosecution at a
28:35
Speaker 9: misdemeanor level for the amount of drug we're talking about.
28:38
Speaker 9: At the same time, this is unusual, to say the least.
28:42
Speaker 9: Officials say they don't have any record of an illicit
28:45
Speaker 9: drug like this being found in the West Wing or
28:46
Speaker 9: in the White House before, and so it is truly rare,
28:50
Speaker 9: and it has gotten a lot of interest in the public.
28:53
Speaker 1: Well, there you go. Expectations are being lowered. We're not
28:57
Speaker 1: going to find out. We just want you to know that,
29:00
Speaker 1: we're not going to let you know who's drugs is worse.
29:04
Speaker 1: This is what media would do in Russia and China.
29:08
Speaker 1: This is what the media would do in places like Cuba. Okay,
29:12
Speaker 1: they didn't go out there and do this on their own.
29:15
Speaker 2: Okay.
29:15
Speaker 1: What they did do is they put this out there,
29:18
Speaker 1: and they decided to put it out there, folks. They
29:23
Speaker 1: decided to put it out there so that so that
29:26
Speaker 1: because the White House needed them to do this, to
29:29
Speaker 1: dial back the intensity, right, Tell them it's impossible, Tell
29:34
Speaker 1: them that it will never happen.
29:35
Speaker 2: Tell them that will never ever find out who did this.
29:38
Speaker 1: Low worthy expectations in MSNBC NBC News instead of investigating
29:43
Speaker 1: a cover up here. They go out there and they
29:46
Speaker 1: put out two minutes of pure propaganda saying to the audience,
29:50
Speaker 1: expect for this crime to never be solved. Expect that, well,
29:55
Speaker 1: you'll never just go ahead and accept you'll never know who's.
29:58
Speaker 2: Cocaine this is.
29:59
Speaker 1: We're gonna to tell you that every time we test
30:01
Speaker 1: this cocaine, it makes a sample smaller, very little amount
30:05
Speaker 1: of cocaine, so we'll probably never know whose it is.
30:09
Speaker 2: So just don't expect to find that out.
30:11
Speaker 1: So we put those expectations out there, We'll put that
30:13
Speaker 1: propaganda out there, and then you'll be content to go, yeah,
30:16
Speaker 1: I heard yesterday. They'll probably never find out who it is.
30:19
Speaker 1: We'll never know who it is, so just understand that,
30:23
Speaker 1: just expect it. You'll never know who's cocaine this is. There,
30:28
Speaker 1: you go, folks, that's the end of it. But at
30:30
Speaker 1: least we found the cocaine, and thank goodness, everybody's okay
30:33
Speaker 1: at the White House and it wasn't anthrax. Right, that's
30:35
Speaker 1: the positive here. That's the real excitement here that you
30:41
Speaker 1: should be excited about, is that we're at that point.
30:45
Speaker 1: If you don't think that this White House is directly
30:47
Speaker 1: colluding with this cover up with the media. You're wrong,
30:50
Speaker 1: and I just proved it to you. I hope everybody
30:53
Speaker 1: will pay attention to what I just played you. I
30:55
Speaker 1: hope everyone will share this with their family and their friends.