Latest / Palafox Media Network / Kingdom Revelations: Power of Faith
Transcript
- Charles: Good evening, everybody. This is Charles Barfield. Welcome to Kingdom Revelations. And I'm the host Charles Barfield and later I'm gonna have ⁓ Greg Brink come in. We're gonna be talking about today's issues as relevant to the kingdom of God and what's going on in the world today. And look forward to having those discussions about big issues about what's going on in the world. So as we always start the show off with commentary, this is the second w segment we call Barfield on the mic. My brothers and sisters of faithful Jesus Christ, we have got to take a stand. The enemy is dirty, it doesn't play fair. What we're seeing right now all across the globe is a bunch of elite being there, particularly white males, not exclusively, but white males that ⁓ are expanding this concept that we call Zionism to the point where it is now dealing with AI concept called transhumanism. Now The trans transhumanism is a concept that the goal is to place AI to replace human beings. It's genetic editing and merging of flesh with machines. And we're gonna be dealing with that a little bit later with with Greg Fink. But what you have the power that be design is arrogant billionaires specifically. Peter Field, the spokesman who spoke at the RNC convention. He now lives in Argentina, but he's the one that's supporting the current president, giving him big money. Also another guy, B-Nair, Sam Altman, AI, CIO investor, Bigonaire guy, Tim Cook, Apple, another guy, Big Nair guy. The the Wiggle bought boss, twins, billionaires, ⁓ in bed with the GOP and GOP management. Now, this goes on both sides of the left too, but this is a spiritual warfare we're dealing with. We have these elite billionaires who trying to control population growth, trying to control the war's resources, to dominate companies from Africa and all over to use technology to usurp of the technology that our federal government helped fund it, that made them a lot of them, all of them rather billionaires to get in all kind of corporate bri ⁓ breaks and tax benefits to so-called invent things. off the public dollars, the public coffers, Elon Musk, all of these billionaire elites, and their goal is satanic in nature. And it is to spread a Zionist arrogancy that says that they can control the population, they can control the world resources. And we have got to stand up. For example, is this real conservative values? And isn't these the values against Jesus Christ? I believe in Jesus Christ as creator, Lord, and Savior. I believe that without a doubt. And it's time for the people of God to stand up and to rise up and be counted on the side of God, not on the side of Satan. You there's no three sides of this warfare going on here. You have got to stand up and rise up and let God know whose side are you on. Now Our kids are in trouble and they need our help. And we can't do anything on the sidelines. We have to be intentional. We have to be active. For example, the Center for Democracy did a national sample of public schools, as well as the UK did a study. Let me give you the numbers, the statistical break breakdown. White, young, 15, 16 year old high schoolers, 55%, Asian, 20%, Hispanic. 12 to 15%, black African, 4% to 5%. What are you really talking about, Barfield? These young people have decided to go away with having girlfriends, having normal, godly relationship in view of having relationships with AI girlfriends, computer-generated girlfriends. This is subliminally a demonic movement. And our kids are in trouble and they need us to parent. They need us to stop trying to chase wealth. Stop trying to chase things. The Bible says, seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness. All these things will be added unto you. And we got to stop avoiding our parental responsibility. Our greatest job as parents is to raise functional children and give God the honor by raising them in a way. And this transhumanism idea by these elite, arrogant billionaires. They don't control us. We have the power, but we keep avoiding and forfeiting our power by just acting like we're we we got paralysis that we can't move. We can't be deliberate. We can't be attention. Well that's a lie. It's a satanic lie. We can't go for the head fake. If you go for the head fake, you get slammed dunked on. It's time for us to let all these billionaires know we're not having it. And it's time for us. To stand up for our kids and be real parents and stop idolatry worshiping these men because they have accumulated an enormous amount of wealth. And we got to realize that our power is from the divine creator, our maker, our Lord, our savior. That's our power. And this program is about people power. We know that design is the leaks don't like what we're saying. But we we we we we know that we're getting their attention. We're getting their attention and that's the whole point of this this podcast here is to is is take a stand against all the evil. This is a righteous indignation. This is a godly movement. This podcast is about the kingdom of God, Jesus Christ, that we would not apologize for our love for our Lord and our Savior. Everybody wants to use the first amendment. And then now it seems like the people who love God that believe in traditional marriages, believe in traditional families, we always get rid of you. Like we extreme. But if the first amendment mean anything, it oughta mean everything and the same for all of us. So we got a right to object to the alphabet mafia and the people who think that if you don't believe in a t alternative lifestyle, that you're not some kind of Neanderthal thinking wise. So That First Amendment, what make us Americans. We have the right and the freedom to disagree. Well, let's disagree respectfully. Let's let let's disagree without being disagreeable. So that being said, I wanna bring in now Greg Fink and ⁓ Greg, how you doing, first of all, how you doing tonight? Greg: Doing pretty good. Doing pretty good tonight, can hear me? I can hear you real good. Good. Yes, ⁓ it's been quite quite a weekend here. How's been y how's your weekend been? Charles: ⁓ I I've had ⁓ every day that I'm alive, I'm winning. So regardless about perspective. You know, God is still on the throne, he's still offering and he's still good. So when I know that the things or the problems or situation in life seem to be real small when I re when ya when I think about the big picture, you know. Greg: I agree. I mean, it seems like, you know, how no matter how bad you th you have it, there's always somebody else that has it worse and the Lord's always always gonna be there no matter what. Charles: Right. The sun come up tomorrow. If you keep hoping you keep faith, you know, the Bible says faith, you know, faith is the subtle things hoped for. Evident things are not seen. You know, so that's the whole point of faith is that knowing that you have a Lord or creator that's bigger than you. Our God is bigger than our circ circumstances. He's bigger now. And for all the people that out there that listen to us, realize that your situation is always temporary and you don't make a permanent move. based on a temporary situation. Because prayer changes things. God can change things. So, you know, Don can see us in God see us simultaneously in our beginning state, in our deficiency state, but he also sees us in our finish state. And so we just gotta endure whatever is going on. Now Greg, I I talked about ⁓ there there's a study going on where we have our teenage boys using AI girlfriends. over real girlfriend, which is the the the creator's ⁓ role God designed us to he says in generous to be fruitful and multiply. Now we don't want our kids engaging in in adult relationships when they are not mature enough to handle that. That would be a irresponsible as a parent. However, but we're talking about the spiritual principle that has t that when our children has the the ability to procreate, they're now choosing to go with this AI digital, imaginary. What is your take on that? Greg: Yeah, relationship, yeah. I mean, it's kinda like ⁓ remember that movie Cherry two thousand that was an old movie from the late nineties. It's about men dating robots and men dating droids. And there's a but always this f fascination with Hollywood, which, you know, or as we might call it devil would with with the and you know, intersecting of man and its rel romantic relationship with droids or androids or or robots or some sort of celestial being the side of this earth. Or some sort of a, you know, extraterrestrial being. And so I mean there's always been a fascination with it. Now it's come a lot fuller the last couple of years with a lot more reality here that it's not really behind the smoke and mirrors, it's not really behind the Hollywood cameras, it's reality now. And so ⁓ we've had ⁓ make believe turn into reality and now we're seeing the ⁓ the adjustments made culturally and the ⁓ the benefits of AI, which are a lot, and the detriments of AI, which are probably more. And so I mean we're we're we're gonna see this one with the teenage boys. I know that you always watch those movies of like Revenge of the Nerds or stuff like that where all these guys are like all just scared to death of ⁓ relationships and scared of the girls and it'd always be one guy is in part of the gym or the girls in the the other part of the gym and and ⁓ we always talked about how to overcome that that issue. And now with robots or ⁓ androids or AI, you don't have to worry about the pressure anymore. So it seems like they're falling back on that and that seems to be very sad and a very rapid way of breaking down the ⁓ human environment here pretty quick. Charles: Yeah, ⁓ let me let me let me give you some numbers, Greg. According to this report I was referring earlier from the New York Post, in twenty twenty four, a tech role predicted that AI girlfriends will create one billion dollars in business. Cause that's what the the the billionaires is looking for. It's always the dollar. You follow the dollar, you follow the money, you'll follow the intention. No matter what the euphemism they call it. Yeah, you f you you follow that money and you're d the money would tell you the intention of whatever policy or private policy they're pushing these politicians on both sides and in the middle to try to get their agenda ⁓ rammed through through legislation. But but another another thing says that for according to this ⁓ study says that the study conducted by the male allies in the UK surveyed a thousand boys ages twelve to sixteen and found that a health that eighty-five percent of them was w was spoken to about a checkbox. twenty percent know a peer who is quote dating an L chat box, which is equivalent to a girlfriend. And over a quarter a quarter of their preferred attention and the connection of a a a bo of a bot partner to a real human to human relationship. Greg, what's going on with our kids? Greg: Going with our kids, I mean, it's it's been going on for a while, it's just a little bit more bizarre now. I mean, we we we've had it to where, you know, the sixties and seventies, all the all my my ancestors, my relatives, and ⁓ they all were going crazy throughout those decades and then you had the eighties and nineties, which I'm more of a generation of, I'm a generation X. And ⁓ we we were just, you know, looking at different ways for our relationships, intercom interconnectivity. And ⁓ that was back in the day with the Breakfast Club and New kids on the block and in sync and voice them in and all that kind of stuff. But then we had started, you know, like I said, the Hollywood world became the reality world. And the reality world got in not just on our T V sets, but really in our bedrooms and in our houses. And that's where we're at now to where I think, you know, people are just afraid of rejection. They're afraid of ⁓ heartache that comes with a relationship. They're afraid of a lot of things. I think what AI is doing is not preparing them for the real world. It's not preparing them for life. It's definitely not spiritual. And it's ⁓ definitely more ⁓ driven by the hedonistic, ⁓ narcissistic ⁓ point of view of ⁓ ha handing relationships where, you know, it's ⁓ it's very disconnected. It's very sad. Charles: Yeah, I think I think you you you hit the bullseye. Yeah, you hit the bullseye, Greg. Let me quote another couple of sti statistics based on this ⁓ that the this this this this poll and from this article says that more than half, which is fifty-eight percent, said AI relationships are easy because they quote, can't control the conversation. And then they go and say that the researcher said that a quote this is a direct quote from the article that says A L validates, affirms, never tires, never pushes back. For an adolescent boy still assembling a sense of self, that kind of friction attention can s feel like intimacy, according to Nicholas Bellata, head of the research ⁓ research at Arnorna. ⁓ he he told the folks. So, ⁓ again, Greg: I mean twenty four seven they're ready for a conversation. Yeah. Charles: Yeah. Well they can't get rejected. You know, machine Greg: Actually, there's no rejection. You you ask your chat G V T bot or you ask your grok bot at three o'clock in the morning or four o'clock in the morning. It doesn't matter if you're lucid or or incapacitated, it's gonna tell it's gonna tell you something. It's probably gonna tell you what you think is a good idea too. Especially when you're not in your right state of mind. If you're depressed, I know people who are getting calcin of AI now. I mean they're actually giving calcium classes and Counseling coaches and it's a bot doing all the counseling, it's not even a real human. So the way they have the algorithm set up is that that bot is taking data from encyclopedias of ⁓ literally encyclopedias of psychological knowledge to to talk to a person in a different psychological way and they tailor it toward each different behavior. That's creepy. And that's the way it's turning. Charles: About these being there homosexual, ⁓ openly gay homosexual being there titans economically like Peter Thiele, Sam Alton, Tim Cook, the Winkle Wall, the Big the Winklewolf's twins. All these are being there's pushing this kind of transhumanism. They want AI to just take over everything. I think it's ethically wrong in terms of the the the creative power of God as he laid it out in Genesis to procreate. And I think that ⁓ we have these billionaire guys trying to play God with God's creative force. And and and and we've seen robots and AI that there's a place for that. I'm not one that ⁓ a Neanderthal or so antiquated that I'm against technology. I embrace technology, but I do believe there's an ethical and a a a conscious way morally and economically to to to incorporate AI in our everyday living. But if we have AI dominating the robots doing everything, what are people gonna do by jobs? I mean, you you you need go ahead. Yes, if people can't have no living wage, how are we gonna survive as a as a human? Greg: That's where the living wage comes in. That's where they give everybody a living wage. No idea. Yeah. It's gonna be tough. I use a lot of AI. The more we use AI, the re more I realize it's not gonna take over. It's a long ways off. Yeah. At least five years. Charles: Yeah, I I think that think there's AI, but I think there are some people literally, particularly being there, they have an agenda. They won't replace it. Use AI to literally replace the workforce. You know, again, AI don't call it sick. If you get a robot, you can do 10 jobs. If you if you get an AI eventually, they can do all the jobs at McDonald's. Or what are the young kids going to make to make money, to earn a earn a living, to buy their first car, to teach them Responsibilities and how to work hard. I mean, if ADI doing all the jobs, there's gonna be a whole lot of unemployment going on. Greg: Yeah, then you go back to building houses. And there's AI doing that too. AI's doing construction. I see I I see the remote control lawnmowers out there in Orlando where you're at. They got all kinds of remote control lawnmowers all over town. And wireless and cordless lawnmowers and just yeah, manless lawnmowers just out there cutting the yard. I've seen it quite a bit. Cutting the medians and the ⁓ I mean government yards and everything else and government maintenance. And so a lot of those workers who Or work for the cities or the counties are not they're not working anymore 'cause they ⁓ they have a remote control a lot more doing it and we I don't think they're doing the wheat eating, but you know, it's pretty sophisticated. It's pretty creepy. Charles: Well, in terms of how do you think that that's gonna that's gonna play in terms of job creation, job sustainability, fire to life. Greg: Yes, it's gonna be difficult because I mean, I tell everybody if you let AI control you, you're in world of trouble with you control AI and find a way to manage it for efficiencies but the same time creating other work for humans because, you know, what they say time is money and the more time you had to work, the more money you can go out there and make and the more resources you have to do it with. However, at the same time, if you're using that time just to sit in your butt and watch T V because you're not working, because ⁓ you're letting the computer do everything or the AI do everything, you're not Using the spare time to to make anything constructive. I mean, it's gonna be it's gonna be very hard for society a generation down the road to ⁓ catch up because they're gonna be and ⁓ once you start teaching people how to not work and how to be lazy, that mindset, the devil's mindset sets in and the devil's the heart of all this laziness and all this confusion. And and using it in this way to where, you know, you're being slothful and ⁓ productive like you know, the Lord wants us to be and And regular human structure needs a civili. It's a produ productive. And whenever you're not that way, it's a it's a very slippery slope. Charles: Yeah, it is. I often in my in in in my messages of preaching the aspect of my ⁓ calling often to tell a congregation that you know the devil will take you farther than you wanna go, make you pay more than you wanna pay. And ⁓ ultimately his goal is to kill, steal and destroy. That's his nature. That is nature that we as human beings, we've got n we we'll embrace AL and like you said, If we don't let AL control us, my concern is as a aggregate, as a as a as a population aggregate, or the masses really allowed A AI to dominate everything rather than have it enhanced them with some level of human control. That is really the issue to me. And I don't know the answer to that yet, but ⁓ that's the concern. Greg: We don't. Yeah. As you say in the court of law, the jury is still out on this and ⁓ and we're gonna see how it plays out over the next I think we'll probably see something pretty quick here in the next five to ten years. I think social media is starting to run its course as far as being the big ⁓ the big influencer like it was about a decade ago. Then ⁓ social media turned into AI basically on all of our phones. And so it embraced it and said they're all kind of working together. If you actually look at the new chat or the new Apple updates are They're teaming up with the Google Gemini, which is the AI project for Google, and they're teaming up with the OpenAI, which is Chat GPT. And so a lot of the ⁓ mechanisms and the nuances of your Apple phones and of course any of your droid phones is all Google driven. And so I mean, with all those already built in place, ⁓ AI is at your fingertips and your work or your efficiency potentially is at your fingertips, but also your devauchery is at there as well. And ⁓ So I mean it's it it's it's good. I'm not a neat result either. I think AI is great and had a lot of tools for workforce efficiency, but using it for play and relationships and to ⁓ to basically have interpersonal communication and spiritual relationships and romantic relationships is really weird. I do not think good. Well Charles: It remains to be seen. The jury's out. ⁓ we don't know what the the verdict's gonna be until it comes out and we have, you know, the empirical data to to demonstrate where this thing is going. Th there's definitely some levels of heightened concern from an economic, yeah, humanistic standpoint, from a moral standpoint. So that that remains to be seen. But I do believe that as parents we have to be the overseers. for the guidance and instruction and direction of our children. And we can't sit back because of our own convenience that AI kinda helps us and be lazy and and abort our our most primary job as parents is to steward our children to be productive citizens. And so they don't have the life experience that we do as parents. And they're gonna ⁓ often do what young people do. And so it's up to us to have that. parental instruction, a parental influence because as you know my word devil wood, which I call a Hollywood, d the Devil Wood is always trying to give them a demonic image, can intentionally, subliminally, right? From from the movies, from cartoons. Everything has a devil wood twist on it and it's designed to hook our kids into the the the the the satanic abyss. And so we have to be vigilant as parents and stewards that God has ⁓ equipped us to be, to to raise our kids ⁓ with a with a level of common sense and and and and godly instruction so that we won't be h held accountable by God. Yeah, there's laws and and and and legal ways to to to do things, but ultimately God charges a parent to raise their k their their children in a way that that That God will have us to raise them. People get different, but I believe the Bible, you know, in the God way it is the best way. Now, people can respectfully have a a different conclusion of that, but I just believe that ⁓ I know through my faith that God works. Yeah. Now, let's let's transition to another big subject matter I wanna d we want to deal with tonight, and that is this emerging Africa. Particularly Greg: It does. Charles: Greg, the Congo. The Congo has about $24 trillion of value in untapped mineral wealth. Africa is the world's richest continent in terms of natural resources, holding roughly 30% of the world's mineral reserves, 12% of the world's oil is in Africa, 8% of the world's natural gas is in. Africa. New fresh discoveries and geological research is in Africa. What we call Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo DRC, holds halfway half of the world's cobalt and cocaine, which are critical for electrical vehicle batteries, such as the companies that ⁓ Elon Musk, the world's first ⁓ I guess tree in air, all this cobalt and the coating. batteries and the technology is necessary and it's come from the co the Congo because it's is it's critical for electric vehicles, batteries and everything that designed with electrical vehicles, which is what the Western world's going to. And some more statistics that rare earth minerals, precious gems, stones, the Nikau, like in Tanzania, Burundi, Namibia. with ocean oil and gas and your uranium pro production. You know, Africa is the largest copper producer of the manganese, the uranium, the Tonskaston. But yet with all that untapped wealth, even seven percent of the global co cobact and coal train output is right there. But we have all these western countries, not just western but eastern countries. Every violation from China, ⁓ Soya Raper, ⁓ you name it, United States, Britain, France, you name a country. Everybody is there in the Congo getting instilling the precious wealth, minerals, and they got a civil war that's been going on since 1996. Six million deaths since 1976 that we know of. The numbers that they tell us. Then we have 23.4 million people, the Congolese people are suffering because they can't get food. Food insecurity is a big deal. Why? Because China, Turkey, France, you name it, all of these world powers, DBA, they're getting rich. UAE is getting rich and wealthy because they stealing and transporting all these valuable goods from the Congo so they can live the great life. or lack of better ⁓ expression. And no one seems to be caring about this issue, talking about these issues. We talk about contemporary six million people that no one really dispute these numbers. Who knows? They maybe were more astronomical than that. So this is one of the rare equal opportunity government oppressors and violators that no one has clean hands in this. From Channel, you name it. All world powers seem to be guilty as the original scene in terms of the financial economic ⁓ exploitation of this Congo area in Africa. What say you on this? Greg: I think it's just another testament in the fact of the of the narcissism of all these leaderships of all these countries here. And it's another extended testament to the fact here that ⁓ the Lord is not, you know, basically being listened to or his directions not being heeded or followed at all with the leaders who are abandoning these people here and just letting them die and suffer in the way they are. I mean, I know a few quite a few missionaries here that go to Africa a lot and I have a lot of family members who I have been missionaries in Africa and they go there and they talk about the the Word of God and Lord and and whenever I ask them how many people they how to support them or how come it's not higher on the radar, they just shake their head. I mean people just don't seem to ⁓ to care or want to encourage the ⁓ the the furthering of the communities over there and there's still I think a lot of embredded ⁓ embedded racism. I think that's a lot of it has to do with it. I mean, you know. It people just always think of racism is just in their nation or just it's like historically the north versus the south. No, it has a lot more meanings than that. I mean it's you know th th this hatred of different communities that you're not aware of or you're afraid of is disgusting and sick and the fact that they want to just allow them to suffer because they're too ignorant or too evil to even care is just sad. Well Charles: I I like that characterisation that you said that people are too evil to even care. I I'll agree that that that that characterization and and to be very blunt and very to the point. These are these are African melanated black skinned African people and that's why the world don't give a you know what about it. They don't care. They don't care. ⁓ if this was ⁓ people who had pale or white skin. It would be a national outrage and it wouldn't have been going on this long. You and I know that. It it just that's the real hypocrisy. And the the thing that gets me is that it everybody can take a a a portion of the blame pie in terms of the world leaders here. The G seven, G eight leaders, the the Eastern ⁓ countries, the Middle Eastern countries, the Western countries. It's a equal opportunity of preceding power kind of responsibility, a lack thereof. of accountability for this outrage. It's is is immorally shocked to conscience of of God and humanity. I think humanity demands that we stop this. And the the the driving force of this is greed. That old monetary greed. Greg: That's the reason why whenever I hear people say that the international leaders or the international allies are angry with America, angry at this country, angry at that country. Personally those international leaders have not earned my respect to give a hoot about what they're angry about because why they're doing this, you know, all they're doing is just being hypocrites. I mean hu hugely. I mean the international leadership, international allies are international enemies. All of like you say they're all together in this mess together because they're all ignoring it together. And they're all embracing the hate and embracing their ignorance and embracing the evil and ten tendencies of you know, they they might want to stop one dictator over here, but they're gonna encourage more dictators over there. They wanna stop this genocide because it's a genocide they're they're offended by, but they're not willing to stop genocides of people who they don't give a hoot about. And ⁓ it's just, you know, situationally situational ethics. And it's it's wrong. Totally. It's almost like the AIs are driving these countries. Well Charles: Well, let me ask you this. It in terms of there's so many raw earth minerals that've been established in in in Africa lately. Different Africa's a the biggest ⁓ continent. It has so many different countries than Africa, but there's so many and I believe divinely ⁓ things that's a part of the earth that God is allowing to restore his is his people back to a certain state economically without the exploitation. So what what what is concerning me is that it seemed like to me America is burning a lot of bridges, particularly with economically, with this new regime with this new president and his tone and his direct vulgar language as you relate to Africa. You know the statement whole kind of kind countries that he's referred to. But yet after it's emerging, it's got so much wealth and so many potential for the population, for its consumers above so many young people per capita than anyone in the globe, anywhere else in the globe. And they're merging. And so, so it seemed like to me, China and even Russia to a certain extent, communist nation has made a smarter move on the global scene as to ⁓ a courtship of Africa. Now I don't I don't necessarily agree with their intention, because I think it's always a dirty economic intentions, but but it just seemed like to me I don't understand our the United States ⁓ positioning as it relates to Africa because if you look at it straight from an economic standpoint, that is a a a just a huge big whopper chopper business opportunities that we wonder. Greg: I mean it it's a huge opportunity that we could be taking advantage of in Africa and here's the best way you would take advantage of it to help the the people there. I mean with all the wealth they have, I think they're pretty used to the fact that pirates and warlords and thieves and criminals and ⁓ people from other countries come in, take their resources, make a lot of money off the resources, use them as slave labor, trade labor, human trafficking labor, and basically screw the people over. that live there and so basically everybody else gets rushed off their resources. Everybody else is getting ex rich and exploiting their resources. They don't have any return on investment basically back to their community to the same degree that was being robbed and siphoned out their community. And that'd be a actually a cool thing, an awesome thing, a a blessing if some leader or government will actually go into Africa the same way we do into Venezuela or these other countries here and and invest in actually returning the resources of that rich country back into the people of that country so where they can actually have a better life. They don't have to be walking a half a mile or a mile with the water or to the river or starving or have famines or have all these diseases and sicknesses that they don't have the ability or the ⁓ financial resources to to take care of themselves with because they have all these resources here that everybody's just stealing from them. And so maybe it would be I think it'd be a good idea. to ⁓ you know, to to bring ⁓ back to the people of those countries, especially the Congo, and put the citizens there to work and have them sort of enjoying the ⁓ the the resources that they have and enjoying the faith that comes with it and all the wonderful headaches ⁓ having all that kind of ⁓ wealth for a nation can can benefit. But right now we're just robbing Charles: E everybody it's been stealing for Africa for decades, decades, decades. But this is the thing. You got a lot of great African ⁓ leaders from Burkino Pas Paso to a lot of different ⁓ countries that Greg: Tree. Right. Charles: So France is really it it is going broke. It it it it it it's it's is on the cost of just disintegrating as we speak because they ⁓ Africa has stopped the steal movement and they're looking out for self-interest for the people of Africa. Now, what you've had traditionally for decades, you had CIA, United States, all these culvert and even policies from the United States to all kind of bad intention governments that have stolen and set up puppet dictators to steal from the people and get wealthy from multilateral corporations and ⁓ international corporations that set up puppet ⁓ dictators to do what America's and France and all the West bitten. Now you got real young, great leadership in many different African nations that they said, no, the steel is over it, the gig is up, and we're looking after Africa for Africa by Africa people. And that means that when you get to that point of maturity and realize that you're not gonna let people rip you off any more economically, so now they're saving billions and even trillions of dollars in a very short time frame at to the detriment of the free load of thieves that's been robbing them blind for decades. And so the question is that what would some of those countries like France and Britain and Europe do? 'Cause Europe is in They got problems on top of problems on top of problems on top of problems. Greg: I mean i i i I mean, I don't want to coin a phrase here, but ⁓ let's go ahead and do it here. Congo first. I mean, you know, it might be a g a good idea here for the the the leadership of those different countries here to put to put the ⁓ those leaders first and and and those people first and everything. I mean, I'm not really into isolationism or nationalism or anything like that. I mean, 'cause as much as we all say America has that with Trump and I mean, pretty much a lot, you know, most countries kinda have that with themselves, but at the same time A lot the countries would like to put their people first but are failing to because they don't they get taken over militarily or ⁓ you know, criminally by the law enforcement. They get co opted or paid off and they go against their own people and they go with corruption and corruption and greed come in and take over everything. And ⁓ so while at the same time you you want to put y you know, using slogans and using terminology like Congo first or nations first or stuff like that is kind of the point we're going toward. reality is how do you make that happen? And how do you get the r right leadership in place? And that's what, you know, without looking like America's trying to insert somebody in or to do it democratically, but you know, who's gonna take that next step? I mean who's gonna take the leadership role in that area? Well is it gonna be really done for the right intentions? Charles: Well, we gotta have credibility, that's the problem. We've we're losing credibility. Insult people and now you need people, you need the resources, ⁓ and things of that nature. And you have really insulted people, it's very hard to come back from that when you don't have no sense of credibility, no sense of neutrality. And then not only that, but you have a hostile approach towards Africa in the continent of Africa. And so therefore we need ⁓ Greg: Yeah, that's Charles: new businesses opportunities and we need the people Africa or or the ⁓ the the younger population in terms of globally all the wealth that that's gonna be dominated from Africa's gonna control the whole world. It's just a matter of short order time-wise because Africa is the only self-sufficient continent that literally does not need anyone else. You know, and if Africa had a nuclear weapon, the whole world would have a problem. Because The United States and the and the G A only countries, they only respect people who have nuclear weapons, you know. You don't see United States problem with Pakistan like they do Iraq or Iran or many of these countries don't have a nuclear weapon and so a and and and and and and and the re the hypocrisy of our posture ⁓ from the United States is that the only twice that nuclear bomb was ever dropped. Who did that? United States. We dropped two. Atomic Yeah. What but but ⁓ try to tell I Iran you can't have a nuclear weapon we try to tell North Korea you can't have a control China that Greg: It is. It worked. ⁓ Well of course we do. How are you gonna be a super how are you a superpower if you let other people try to be superpowers? How do you say a superpower if you encourage other people? Charles: Well we didn't read Because see, again, when you try to be the policeman of the world, Greg, to and try to economically bully people, y if you recall historically, we really didn't know. We tried to stop China for having a nuclear weapon for the fifty, sixties, seventies. We didn't even know it in China just we were laughing at China like we were laughing at North Korea to around about the seventies when they started getting nukes and now they got plenty of nukes. And they are really, they are real. Greg: Yeah we can yeah. Charles: world power in terms of channel because they they own a big portion of our debt and Japan has a greater portion of our debt. And at some point we're gonna start if if America keeps ticking people off, they're gonna eventually call our debt in. But then what we're gonna do? Greg: Bankruptcy. Who knows? I mean, cut our losses. I mean, we already have like forty trillion in debt and probably several trillion of this money that we owe the other country. Just go ahead and just file bankruptcy and r it's our new dollar. I mean, you know, in all seriousness, I mean, you know, that that we're in such financial circ si situation that's so bad right now. It's I have no idea how we're gonna get out of it. I mean, we're our debt is increasing at such a rapid rate. It really doesn't matter who the president is. Or who the Congress is, all these guys are spending like drunken sailors. They don't care. Republicans, Democrats. Nobody's cutting spending. Nobody's putting the the resources back to where they came from. Nobody's investing in America to the same degree that they need to be. And nobody's actually ⁓ like at the same time as f fleecing the world. I mean, we're we we give all these billions of dollars to hundreds of countries all over the world and and we don't do anything to invest in our own. I mean, I get it. They're trying to invest in world peace. They think they're gonna buy everybody off and keep it peaceful. ⁓ it's working, I guess, okay right now. I guess we're in a somewhat of a peace y peaceful war. I mean I I don't know if we are or not, I don't think we are. But at the same time, I mean it's ⁓ it's very sad the the direction that everybody's going. And ⁓ I mean all it goes back to the AI and relationships. I mean it it it makes sense on why we're ignoring people who are in need and why we're ignoring countries in need and why we're trying to do everything. I mean, if you look at a lot of the Decisions. I mean it looks like they're being controlled by AI right now. Charles: But look look what China did. We we we did the America did the opposite of of China. What what Mercury did what Merc is doing is they're trying to eliminate job what America being there and leash more. They motivation billions and billions of dollars and eliminate tens and tens of thousands of jobs. So no in other words, they would rather have Greg: Yeah, we did. I think China is too I think we're joining China with that, 'cause China's doing that too. Charles: ⁓ and have known workers and then they get millions of dollars and billions of dollars from the savings. That that's the philosophy. However, the opposite of that, or the adverse of that in China, for decades, China have been investing in in in wind, solar, turbine, high speed, rail, all these sophisticated stuff. I mean, China is amazing cities and even Japan, you you have it where they're building things for the people to to to manufacture stuff. We as Americans, we don't manufacture nothing no more. We want to cut and eliminate all the jobs because the leaks want all the money and few jobs where people like China know that they'll build in things and stuff so that their people, the populist people can have jobs and deployment and things like that. And that's the problem. Greg: Well first of all that's a problem the the way China's doing it. I mean they're they're they're paying their wages extremely low over there. And ⁓ first of all they have a large a much larger population to work with than America does. So they have true endless people and they have endless people and so the their manufacturing their environmental standards are far lower. I mean if we had Greenpeace and Riverkeepers and all those guys in China, man, it it it'd be horrible. They don't pay attention to any kind of environmental cords or or any kind of environmental standards whatsoever. Now, I'm not really big ⁓ I'm not really big ⁓ you know, on the extreme standards on the world standards on the environment stuff. I mean but at the same time you gotta be a good steward. You just can't, you know, environmentally rape the entire community and and pay your I yeah, they got big buildings, they got a lot of cool stuff because they got a huge profit margin there. Their costs of manufacturing is low. I mean their standards, their workforce standards are low. Their employee wages are low. I mean it's and and and if America wants to go back to to that way, I mean, I don't think ⁓ the the people here have a stomach for it. Charles: Well, I think that's the whole problem. Agree, we have to give people, you know, Greg: And they wouldn't make more than five bucks an hour. Charles: Well well the thing is that as you know, like in Japan, men and CEOs are capped off with the the percentage of what they can make for the worker. We don't have that in America. We want the CEO, we idolatry worship the CEOs, even though the C male CEOs are getting government money to do this and open this and business and and and cost their quote unquote entrepreneurs. There's a big gap between how a child and Japan cap off the percentage of what a CEO can make versus America. America wants unlimited CEO wealth because we like that. It makes them feel good. It's dumb and ignorant and silly. Greg: It's not a make ⁓ feel good thing. It's a it's a freedom thing. I mean, you know, I mean it's ⁓ you know this the people businesses should be able to make their money without the government telling ⁓ that they can't make so much or the government coming in and trying to structure the pay the pay of a private enter enterprise. Now, if it wants to be the government wants to be part ownership of that business and wants to structure their pay and say that they can cap the pay, then they can go ahead and help pay the ⁓ pay pay the taxes and pay the health insurance and pay everything else if they want to get involved in that part of the business. But I don't think that that's where I think you need to separate commerce and and the government. You need to let have a you know, but Romney said, you know, businesses are people. And that's what a big thing about a lot of the ⁓ people on the left and the right are both seeing that now. They're they're treating businesses of people. And and this is back to the AI thing. The AIs are now taking over and doing the work of the CEOs and AIs are doing a lot of this work. And so, you know, it's I mean, everything is changing so rapidly with the AI movement and the corporate structure of businesses and the way Japanese businesses are working with their government or Chinese businesses are working with their government or or in tandem with their government and America it seems like there's an enemy between the government and the business. It seems like the the government's trying to to punish the businesses and and that seems to be you know, y you should be okay with private, you know, enterprise succeeding because that's what, you know, gets people to get off their butts and and and go try to, you know, work better jobs and and get better education. I mean you you don't want to just have everything at even keel. You want to have a ceiling it should be no ceilings. Charles: Yeah. Well, I I I I I I kinda I understand where you're coming from from that, but this is the problem where the so-called business ⁓ entrepreneurs don't seem to realize. It's the public dollars that help build when we send air spaces up there. We go up to space, we learn t the technology they're using using come from the taxpayers. The taxpayers dollars. We fund all the research it, the best Greg: Yeah, we fund the roads. ⁓ Charles: our universities of the of steel, the greatest in the earth for his research grade, for his many things that these private industry get, they get it based upon the the technology, the training that that that the government workers have done. You know what I'm saying? From NASA to like that. So then the taxpayers ought to pay to rise up every every rising ship Greg: Exactly. Charles: raise everybody, Greg. That's what it all boils down to. But when when you got greedy entrepreneurs and they wanna be not just being there, they're not comfortable being being there anymore, they got to be trillionaires to the detriment of people having a living wage. If people don't have a living wage to be able to buy things, w w I mean, what kind of society is that gonna be where the people unemployed don't have money to the to have home, to move and thing. Greg: Yeah. Charles: You got you got a generation I create that don't even believe in buying home ownership. And some of them who believe it say it's not affordable. So there's rent for every day. And usually, statistically, it it it always been the the measure of economic wealth in this country has been single family ownership of a real property home, single family home. That's not the case anymore. Everything is flipping, you know, with this AI and this greed and no one want to share. ⁓ you know, the the these ⁓ the the American pot or the American dollars is because these trillionaires and billionaires they want everything for themselves and they're not trying they don't want to pay taxes. They want to get all our government technology, all our government assistance, and then they want to go have corp send their multi-latter corporations overseas and don't want to pay wages. They don't they'll they're the tax avoiders. These corporations are irresponsible in general. ⁓ they bring in a lot of workers in this country. They know who the immigrants are and then they wanna sit back and be silent and talk about a problem with immigration. That that's a whole nother issue. But the point I'm saying is that these corporations are given a free pass and we as Americans, too many of us, idolatry worship these quote unquote entrepreneurs because we just like the movie devil imagery. of a rule of high role of sh move or shaker, so to speak, in terms of well, we we are addicted to imagery of wealthy individuals. And that's why we we have the current president right in office today because a lot of people was fascinated with charisma. But charisma won't help you when you are going through cancer treatment. When you need health charisma don't pay that. When you need gas to fill up in your car, Greg: Yeah, Charles: Charism and line and scheming don't help you, Greg. It don't help the American people. And the the problem we have is is that people, racism, discrimination, bigotry, you know, the the average white bigot has got to realize that, you know, you want to hurt black people or minorities or or quote unquote the other minority groups to your own determination. What are these billionaires and trillionaires? What do they got in common with the average low economic person? Regardless of cover, they don't get the connection. They don't see. Because they're uneducated and don't care. They feel, they feel like let's let's let's hold the blacks down. Let's stop diversity. Let's stop this. Let's cut that. And and the thing about it is that we know educated people know that welfare is primarily a white person thing. Statistically, it's impossible. But there's a black face on welfare. Even though the statistical numbers, ⁓ well me that whites get welfare more than anybody. But you can't tell the average racially ⁓ person about that that have issue with black people or others or Hispanic people or diversity. You can't tell somebody in Kentucky otherwise. And they'll they then they and they'll tell you, get your hands off my welfare. But everybody else is a problem with everybody else. It's almost like that Everybody don't everybody love their legislative people, Congressmen, they like their senator, but they hate everybody else's senator and congressmen. You know what I mean? That's the problem. Greg: Exactly. We talked about that, yeah. Exactly. I I I agree a hundred percent what you're saying, Charles. I mean you know, I mean the yes, the whole ⁓ the part about greed and entrepreneurs and CEOs that just wanna take, take, take and and not help anybody else. I mean, I'm not really a class MV kind of guy. I don't really I'm not gonna hate or think that they're you know, or lose sleep over it, but is it good? No, it's not good. It's not good for the community whenever you don't give out or be part of the community. I mean, it really does take a village to to raise a child and it takes a village to do a lot of things actually. And I mean that's not just a Hillary Clinton liberal statement. It's a reality. I mean, the people that actually give to their communities and be part of their communities and help them get better and everything else, whether it be through their resources or their ideas or their concepts or good government or something, the communities at work are driven by faith and driven by the Lord and everything really do go a lot farther than the ones who are driven by hate, Satan, evilness, crime, guile, I mean, debauchery. Those communities do not succeed that well. I mean, just look at your unemployment numbers, your homeless numbers, your low income numbers of your housing developments, because whenever you have all that hate and everything else driving it, I'm not saying the people are that the problem is i it's the leadership of those areas. It might be the people as well. I mean, I don't know, I don't live in all these communities and Nobody does so I mean everything is anecdotal at that point there, but the leadership of those, you know, communities that thrive on debauchery and cheating and stealing and basically letting, you know, trillionaires and billionaires take advantage and fleece of people in the communities, whether it be in America or China or Japan or Sri Lanka or India or any nation of in ki in Africa or Europe or South America. I mean any th any of the we see it all over the world that, you know, places are driven by that. you know, end up falling quickly. The ones who are not driven by that. Charles: You have these these economic vultures what I refer to as is that these big they'll trade. They take they they take over the media, they they run advertisement, they they lie, they manipulate the media, they control the media on both sides. They can totally and they control the narrative. If you own the media, Greg, you can tell the story. As you know the first thing Greg: Yeah, well it should never work. Charles: That you don't do in in terrorism is give a terrorist the media. Because the first thing you do when you try to create anarchy or terrorism, you want to control the media. Control the narrative of what you think. And then you start polluting the airways, the print media, the radio, you take over all media and you start creating a narrative that pushes whatever intentional agenda you got you trying to push. And that's a problem. So you have low information voters with no education that don't feel like getting education, don't want to get enlightened, that wants to think and feel a certain kind of way. And then they are indoctrinated sustainably by the consistent brainwashing of lying, mere stuff that people don't have any d decency to say that that hey, that's wrong, that's false. You're giving out false information. It D D these vultures They don't care. They want to make all the money. Not just most of the money. They now want to make all the money. It just don't want no workers whatsoever. They want AI, I AI to be the workers and and you know, ⁓ on one level, AI don't call in sick. AI don't have to have surgery. AI don't have to have, you know, medical surgeries and et cetera, et cetera. That cost the corporation a lot of money. So we as a society gotta grow up and mature up and decide. what kind of society that we want. Do we want people to have wages, if they afford and buy things to exchange in a capitalist society or or not? That that really is what we got decided real quickly, because as you said, the I is trying to take over in all of our life. Greg: I was just looking up a book on my phone just now. There's a book called Infamous Scribblers by Eric Burns. It talks about the use of journalism or the misuse of journalism as it might be in the ⁓ history of this nation. And ⁓ all the way back basically like right around two hundred fifty five years ago, two hundred and fifty years ago. This a little bit before the ⁓ declaration of independence and how even back then, you know, taking advantage and misleading the low information people has been a part of the media consciousness. to control narratives and control the agenda, whether it be legislatively or religiously or or culturally. And so I mean and I'm sure it's been going on all throughout the ⁓ during the Dark Ages. You read about on ⁓ Martin Luther and back during the Gutenberg press and everything and and and all the friars and all the different stories about the medieval days in Middle Europe and Eastern Europe and everything else in Africa and and on just all the history if you really start looking at it People have used the pen 'cause there was no radio or TV as we know it back then, but they're using the pen and the scrolls to to basically narrate and to dictate the the needs and the desires of the king or the throne. And that basically controlled the agenda and mindset of the people back then. And it's being the same way now. Charles: Good. Well, right, let's go to the the another major issue going on right now, and that's this quote unquote so-called Iran Iran peace agreement with the United States and Israel. Now, let me lay it out for the viewing public. Allegedly, this is the the basis of a quote unquote deal. First, it's supposed to be sixty days of ceasefire. Greg: Major. Charles: Which I believe really is just a memorandum understanding rather than a full agreement. Secondly, Iran gets three hundred billion dollars for reconstruction for the bomb that we spent billions of dollars already bombing Iran. Number two. Number three is Iran gets Yeah, yeah. Three hundred additional. Now then there's another twenty four billion in frozen assets that That that that Iran money's been frozen up. ⁓ now with the ⁓ the Obama agreement, it was 1.2 billion. But in my view, that was just interest on the on the 24 billion. Now they get the 24 billion. Full, there's no real certification or verification ⁓ by international inspectors like before. It wasn't an Obama agreement. It was, remember, we had seven allies that agreed. Greg: I think there's some sort of I think there's some sort of oversight to this. I mean it it has conditions on that. They have to be free. I mean they have to basically allow inspections of the uranium and they have to agree not to fund terrorism. Charles: And and and also I think that the US will end the blockade ⁓ of Greg: In the blockade. ⁓ Charles: with other hormones straight, but Iran still will control it and can can seize control of it regardless. So basically this is it must be ⁓ the whole thing is a deal because Israel Israel really or ⁓ a part of it too is supposed to be that Israel is ⁓ supposed to stop bombing ⁓ Lebanon, which ⁓ was a big part of the deal with Iran. Greg: Ridiculous. Charles: Now Israel did go silent on that. That's really the the the the essence of the deal of a deal. Now we don't know a deal. Now this is the first time I've ever seen in the United States where there was any kind of deal that the media didn't have it made before. So we don't know until Friday ⁓ we supposed to get an idea about this and we're we're supposed to rely on the line is man. Greg: That's not gonna happen. Charles: in the history of the earth besides Satan to Greg: Yeah. Charles: So we don't know. We don't know. We're going blind about this. So let's assume all that is right. We'll find out Friday. Him in a truth for him in the truth for enemies, Greg. You know that. Greg: Okay. I don't know no Charles: Nobody on on on the American stage is being to be a a liar like this guy. I mean Greg: Yes you did. Well I do. I got a Rolodex. Yeah. Charles: Whoa, whoa. So so the thing supposed to be a deal but remember Greg in my view this is a 60 day memo of understatement because I don't think ⁓ it's a deal until many of these things are paid off like the 300 billion like the 24 billion those two sets ⁓ two different ⁓ pots of money is that ⁓ now I don't know if Iran is expecting America to pay all that 300 billion it may be the the Gulf states around surrounding states too. Right. But definitely twenty four B for America are free to have that. Now that Greg: Well maybe it'll be peaceful until election day. Charles: If if you if you if you are ready, that is a super mega deal. Just like a lottery twenty four B lot. Greg: Yeah, Iran should be very happy with the deal. I mean Iran should be extremely happy with this deal. I mean they should not be upset at all. And the whole idea that Iran's like a hedging or anything. I'm like, are you serious? I mean, all you have to do is just not fund terrorism, which shouldn't be a hard deal, and not not go actually uranium or nuclear products or buy nuclear weapons or trade any kind of nuclear stuff. I mean, that shouldn't be hard. You sh you know, you should be a regular country and it worries about its people, infrastructure, community. Women go to school, colleges, people driving, you know, and stop the ⁓ stoning of people for no reason. I mean, you know, treat people like humans. That'd be cool. A good start. I mean, if they just did that as a country, they just act like a regular civilized nation that puts their people first and has a regular structure, that that'd be a good start. And I mean they have a good opportunity now to do that. We're giving them a lot of money, we're giving them a lot of leeway just to be a regular nation. All they have to do is just not fund killing and not fund hate. Not fund terrorism and not go after nuclear weapons. I mean it's ⁓ I don't get w how how hard it's gonna be. I know it's against our culture. Our culture is built on hate and terrorism and all that, but Charles: Greg on under the under the ⁓ the Obama Obama agreement wa along w w which was a multilateral agreement, not one American soldier of American died on that, number one. ⁓ Greg: Okay. I get it. We made a mistake. Charles: Yeah, yeah. But but let me ask you this question though, more importantly though. How is it that i it in my perspective is that America is giving these billions of dollars away like it's Eminem candy? I mean, we we we give away billions of dollars like it's Eminem. I mean, what say to you about that? I mean, does as a fiscal conservative, did these billion dollars, this is real money. But I what I don't understand the conservative, where is that anger? Where is that? Greg: I think. I don't either. Charles: ⁓ I think where at that conservative angle by all these beings that we keep giving away, the Doge debacle, with Elon Musk. I mean everybody's getting billions. Greg: People don't want to talk about people really want to talk about the Doge issue. The the reason why Doge was so big and then it went away like a fart in the wind really quick is they started digging they they started finding out that most of that doge money was counterintelligence CIA USA money that was being used for disturbing things and disturbing commonplaces in other countries so they can insert assets. I mean There's no logical I saw about this on the other podcast. I'm probably gonna get called by somebody one day. But there's no logical way you the government's paying for LG T V Q plays in a Muslim country where they kill you for being gay. There's no logical way that they were promoting different things that are counter culture to those different communities all around the world. It's because that's what you do when you insert intelligence agents and that's what you do when you insert you create disruption to a and I mean They say dad is king and dad's been king for years. But ⁓ you know, and d Intel is the backbone of the data. And so I mean, once they started upsetting a lot of apple carts when they started digging up all this money and I know this a lot of it because I have a lot of f family who's involved in all of that, and so I know exactly, you know, what was you know, how how the money trail went. And whenever Elon Musk and Trump were trying to say, ⁓ we're saving people billions, like, no, you're You're sacrificing national security and international security. And and and that's I mean, there's some method i it's not all about greed when you're throwing billions of dollars around like that. And but the difference is whenever you're throwing billions of dollars around to other nations just to not fight each other, that's ridiculous. I mean, you know, Doge, a lot of that money was actually well intended and well needed and should not have been touched and it should not have been messed up messed with and that's also another reason why everybody quit talking about it very quickly. Exactly. Nobody's talking about it anymore. Because they're realizing that maybe, you know, maybe they shouldn't be scratching that itch. Charles: Yeah, it seemed like to me, for all legit reporting that Doge itself cost us extra billions by trying to destroy what they were trying to destroy in the government. Cost us more billion. And this is why I keep saying so many beans we've lost under this administration. It's just like they throwing w around bees and dollars, like it's pee like it's ⁓ and Greg: They didn't know. Yeah, but I mean they're not the they're not the first one. I mean the Biden administration threw away billions of dollars as well. Obama didn't think get to throw away as much because he had a Republican Congress stopping him from doing everything. So once again that's a really good argument there for having ⁓ opposite parties in leadership. You know, having a Democrat president or Republican Congress or a Democrat Congress and Republican president, that's a good argument for that. Because whenever it's all one party, you're proven to be drunken sailors at the The fiscal checkbook. Charles: Yeah. Well th l while we're on this ⁓ subject matter of Israel and and and the situation with Lebanon and no one really saying that much about it. So we'll gotta wait and see as to Friday, I guess we'll get some kind of written idea about this. But Greg: Adds to the different on Saturday. Charles: Yeah, w I I as through the Israel Defence Forces or IDF as they're called, they have a very ⁓ very I use this word loosely, liberal I call it alpha alphabet, you know, alphabet mafia, but the LGBT policy and the military. And we've seen with the Palestinian situation that's unreported. I like to watch a lot of international news because I know our news media is is corrupt. So Greg: ⁓ there's a Charles: All of it. But but you know, but they're controlled by the billionaires, ⁓ designers be in there that suppress everything. So why is it that this this this gay raping of people for male homosexuals in the Israeli military, why is that been suppressed? There's just been reporting of that on the regular, but no one seems to care about it because quote unquote is ⁓ the Palestinians that's been violated like this. So my question is that is rape not a big deal for the Conservatives anymore? When did that Greg: It is. It is a big deal. And why it's not being covered, I have no earthly idea. Charles: Well, yeah, it it just interesting that it it seemed like to me that the d this current president has usurped the GOP. I think the nation is better when we have multiple parties with different ideas, freshers of ideas. When you have one person in control of everything, I mean that power it's just crazy stuff can happen. ⁓ w w when we have woman. You you need to have difference of opinions. Greg: Just so Charles: to come up with some level of compromise to get functionally a policy that can go through. Now I don't believe in a Greg: Yeah, because I mean we had back in two thousand eight we had Obamacare when it was all Democrats. Charles: Yeah. Well yeah, well and that's what I'm saying. Sometimes it matters though when you have people that's trying to do legislature for the good of the people. I think that once we re realize that those legislators, if they ever realize that they are elected by the people, not the powerful, but yet they get elected and then they govern for the powerful, to stay elected. That's the problem. Right. Economy. that the systemic problem encompasses is that when they get in that power it's addictive. It's the worst drug there is and they they they they they govern for the power for ⁓ you know, ⁓ Greg: That seems to be a that seems to be a bipartisan thing, is that the whole power corrupts and e you know what they say, well power corrupts and more power corrupts, more something like that. I forgot exactly a statement, but I mean it's just ⁓ it it seems to be a bipartisan effort of greed and a corruption and it seems I mean, a lot of people always just say it's all about Trump, but he's the first one. I think that's just oversimplifying it. There's been so much re now he might be the newest and he is a first one where we've had AI and social media go full you know, full throttle here and exposing almost every single thing that we never know about a president twenty years ago, thirty years ago, heck, forty years ago, we wouldn't even know anything compared to what we know now. But I think that's actually a some sign of society. We know about everybody, not just the president, or the Congress, or the Senate, or the Supreme Court. I mean we know about your neighbor and about your people down the street and everybody in church more than you ever ever thought you would know twenty years ago. And whenever you exacerbate it on a national level Like a president or a king or a prince or a or a celebrity or something like that. And basically having this here human nature of making everything idolatry driven and and basically using these leaders in your cultures or your government or your religions or your circle as, you know, idols and and you're treating them that way. And social media and AI and technology are the advances that we all benefit from as o are also the authors. Well the detriments and all the creations of that ⁓ debauchery. Charles: Yeah. Well, Greg, let's w go to our final segment I wanna deal with. One of my favorite ⁓ segments of the show is what I what we call the poggy section. The the power of God is. And as you we we deal with the power of God that that that a spiritual thing that defies the odds. And what I will showcase this weekend is the New York Knicks. A fifty three year drought and the New York Knicks won. the National Basketball Association World Championship. And they played it, they did it with great team ball. The the the first ball, it takes faith to believe in yourself when the experts or the pundits said, ⁓ they can't beat Boston. They can't do this. New York's not ready. They don't have a often dominant player. San Antonio has some great young guns in terms of Wimby from the big seven five center from a friend, some other great players. But if there's a will, there's a way. And that's a whole sports is always the best analogy for faith and and and that I think people can easier understood understand because the faith that the New York Knicks they believed in themselves. Number two, they had the grit and the grind. They didn't listen to the the naysayers. They didn't listen to that negative energy. They they look within their own rocks, their own teammates, and they create a brotherhood. They say, we're going to do this. They came down for like three out of four games. Down on 29 won one game. Down 20 something. It each game was a was was like the comeback. You know, when it was out and ⁓ it looked hopeless, they came back. And the third thing, everyone doubted them. All the experts, but then they believe what the doubt was say. And and I'm I'm saying that, you know, everyone on the soundline for us. We want you to know that the power that God has put in you is greater than whatever fear that the devil is telling you what you can't do. You can do all things through Christ who strengthened you if you just believe and bust a move. Your faith, you have to move. You can't just believe. You can believe something, but a faith requires. It's a duality of of believing and action. That makes a belief faith. And when you take a belief and action and you go out there and believe in yourself, believe in God, you can accomplish a lot of things. So, you know, with me, the Bible says, you know, ⁓ things are limited, okay? But things are impossible with man. But things are impossible with God. And so the New York Knicks, I salute them as as champions. ⁓ that they have done amazing, amazing champions and they did it on the road. They won three games in San Antonio. No one on paper would think that the Knicks could beat the San Antonio's first. But that's what we're trying to say with this show is that with God you can do anything. We know that the powers will be of watching this show. Thank you, New York Times. Thank you all ⁓ for following us. We we we we we we hear you, we see you. And We're just trying to say that this is a people power show. This is a people powered show. Well, you we we want you to recognize, identify your power. Your power comes from your God. That's divine. Before you was even touch in this word, God always had a purpose. He had a design for you. I don't care what race you are. I don't care what part of the United States you're in. I don't care what country you're in, what continent you're in. If you just believe. that you are who God said you could be. You can achieve that. You can achieve that. Because at the end of the day, we're all our brothers and sisters keepers. God will find us to be that. And we all for short time, but part of the human family is to reach help help each other out, to get to the destination, to help help manifest and help others out. It you can't leave, you come in this world nothing. And I guarantee you you're gonna leave as you came in. You can't take no Rose Ross with you, no big houses. You y you know, you you may think you can, but you're a delusion, sir, ma'am. You only can take what you brought in this world yourself. And you don't need to get back. God takes the spirit back. You know, so be the best you can be. And Greg, you wanna say anything about the new New York mix? Greg: Congratulations to them. was a good good series. I didn't get to watch most of it, but I do love their colors being a Florida Gator guy. Orange and blue. I mean great. It might be a different shade of orange and blue, but I think it's pretty similar. But they did a great job. They're a good team and ⁓ I'm not much of a basketball guy, so I just kinda watched the ⁓ last bit of them. More of a football pig scan guy. I can't wait for a preseason here to be starting here any time now. But ⁓ but yeah, congratulations to them. It was great. And ⁓ it was I mean, from what I hear they're not a big team of superstars. They were a team of there were a team. And and and they won by putting team first. And ⁓ you know, the Lord really helped control the team in a very well way and they did a great job. Charles: Yeah, yeah. They they they they're kind of a team ⁓ I won't say misfits, but it's like, you know, ⁓ Bronson, the main star was let go in in Dallas and no one thought he would be who would be. They kept saying he was too small, he couldn't do this, he couldn't do that. All that God does is wing. You know, people say what he can't do, you know, like the scriptures say, we know, you we can do all things through Christ who strengthened us and you gotta just have faith in yourself and believe in yourself. And ⁓ and that's what we wanna say about this show, you know, keynote revelations. We know that the powers that be don't like the things that we're saying. We know that this is really ⁓ spiritual warfare between God versus ⁓ the devil. There are demonic forces out there trying to pollute the media, trying to pollute the way we think, trying to pollute ⁓ our identity, our godly identity. And what we're trying to do is give you revelation to self-empower you and influence you to know That God is real. Jesus Christ is is is is real and we want that. What we're saying to spark you to be better or to do better individually and for your brothers, be your brothers and sisters, people. And it it's gonna take the will of people. We're not doing this. We're not like a lot of those preachers out there trying to pimp people for money for material gain. We do it because we love it. We we love you. And we welcome you. We you may not always agree with what we're saying. You can disagree, but we can be respectful, whether we agree or disagree. And like us, follow us, comment, or let us know what you're thinking. So that's how we make each other better by being our brothers, sisters. So Greg, any bottom thoughts you wanna say for we what we Greg: I think you I I I think you said everything operated pretty well there. I don't think I could do anything any better. Charles: Well well God bless you all and peace and love guide you and always rock on everybody. Greg: Exactly. How good night. Charles: Good night.