Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Ep. 13 - The Stakes of 2020

Transcript

Ep. 13 - The Stakes of 2020 · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: The impeachment is over. Now the real political risk begins.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. Welcome back to Verdict
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles. Impeachment is over. Finally.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Now you can get a good night's sleep. Now we
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: can get a good night's sleep. But actually we were
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: talking about this a little bit last episode. Impeachment was
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: always going to end the way it was going to end.
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: It was never going to end in the removal of
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: the president. In some ways, I wonder if impeachment was
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: kind of the safe period for conservatives and politics, and
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: actually now the real threat begins. We are told every
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: single election cycle this is the most important election of
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: our lifetimes. Now everything is about twenty twenty. I want
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: to know, from your vantage on the inside in the Senate,
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: what is really at stake in twenty twenty. Look, I
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: think it is an unbelievably consequential election and on a
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: lot of fronts. But let's step back, take just the
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: meta level first reward and punishment. Look back over the
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: last year, over the last three years, do you like
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: the behavior of the Democrats? No? Do you like the nuttiness?
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: Do you like the gallop to the left. Do you
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: like the abuse of the Department of Justice and the
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: FBI and targeting the president and attacking the president and
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: impeaching it for partisan purposes? Do you like the squad
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: and NAOC attacking Israel, embracing socialism and going nuts? If
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: you do well, depending on what happens in November, we'll
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: either get a lot more of it or a lot
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: less of it. What I mean, obviously they've they've run
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: far to the left. What could happen though, I mean,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: just beyond more crazy AOC tweets and speeches. If the
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: Democrats are rewarded November, if they have a good election, Yeah,
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: everything we've seen now gets amplified, and he gets amplified tenfold.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: Politicians are not complicated creatures. They react to incentives. If
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: something works, they do it again, they do more. Works again,
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: they do more of it. They do more of it.
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: And by the way, if it doesn't work, they stop
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: doing it. If they get punished. Look, it's a little
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: bit like when your dog takes a crap on the
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: on the sofa. If you whack him with the newspaper,
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: he'll stop doing that. Politicians need to be whacked with
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: newspapers more Um, I think that's I think that's an
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: issue that everybody could get behind. I'm all for it, um,
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Except the problem is the newspapers work for the Democrats,
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: so they're not going to whack them. And we could
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: take a total digression and go Joe Peshy good fellows
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: and whacking politicians. But that's a really bad idea. We're
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: going to get banned from Twitter. It's actually something I
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: want to ask you about too, But okay, I interrupt.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: Let me get an example. Why do you think it
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: was that Barack Obama was never impeached because John Bayner
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: refused to do it. Yeah, but why, I don't know why.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: Because the Bill Clinton impeachment didn't go well. Huh. So
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: Bill Clinton's president, Republicans impeach him. They got all energized,
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: they bring the impeachment and what happens. Bill Clinton's approval
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: rating goes up and Republicans approval rating goes down. Bill
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: Clinton loves it because the American people say, look, this
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: guy's actually focusing on what we care about, and who
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: are these crazy Republicans that are focused on just a
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: partisan fight. Well, so fast forward to the Obama administration. Listen,
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: there were grassroots activists asking all the time, impeach Obama. Now,
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: I'll be clear, I never thought we should impeach Obama,
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: but I would get asked. And this is sure. I
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: ran in twenty twelve. I've never been elected to anything thing.
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: I mean, the first thing I've ever been elected in
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: my life is Senate. So I'm running. I'd be with
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: activists and they'd say, why don't we impeach Obama? And
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: you know, I'd usually say I wouldn't necessarily argue with them,
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: just because it's not a bad idea. It's not a
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: good idea to get the fight with, like grassroots activists
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: for you, But I just the answer I would usually
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: give is, you know what it's better. The better solution
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: is beat him at the ballot box. That rather than
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: use impeachment, trust democracy or trust the democratic republic we have.
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: We're not a pure democracy, but trust the democratic checks. Now,
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: So what that means, and by the way, every Republican
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: had accepted in Congress, it was received wisdom. Impeaching Clinton
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: was a disaster. We don't want to do it again.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: That's why that's why they didn't go down that road.
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: If the Democrats win, doing this every bad behavior gets amplified.
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: So that's the broader meta level, but it's a very
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: real level. That's an important point because what you're cigar,
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: you will get, and not just a little worse, a
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: lot worse like the vindictive, personal, nasty, abuse my power.
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: You use everything for partisan gain, ripped the State of
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: the Union speech. Look fast forward to to where they
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: go if this gets rewarded. I think it's really scared.
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: The point that is so interesting here is that I
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: thought we had the final impeachment vote last week, the
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: important impeachment vote. But actually what you're saying is the
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: really important impeachment vote, the vote that is going to
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: tell us what future impeachments will look like, or what
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: future behavior from the party that impeach will look like.
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: That actually didn't happen last week. That's going to happen
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: this November. In November, listen, the Senate acquitted President Trump
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: about four thirty in the afternoon, five and a half
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: hours earlier to eleven am. Jerry Adler announces there they're
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: they're subpoenaing John Bolton. That's right, They're not done. This
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: has released the hounds. This is attack, This is used
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: everything we've got and and if they win in November,
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: all of that gets amplified. Now let's talk specifics. You're right,
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: every politician says is the most important, and listen, if
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: it's your rear end on the important to you, they're
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: actually not not necessarily lying when they say that, it's
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: just very specific. Yeah. Look, do you remember what Reagan
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: said against against Jimmy Carter where he's where he said,
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: uh uh, you know, recession is when your neighbor loses
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: his job, Depression is when you lose your job, and
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his job. That's right. Um,
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: I mean all of that is is very real if
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: it impacts you. But if you look at substantively, I mean,
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: think back to the state of the Union. Think think
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: back to the President reciting all the incredible gains in
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: the economy that that frankly, if you had predicted three
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: years ago, no one would have believed you, right that,
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: the media would have mocked you. That will never happen.
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: It's impossible. No, we can't bring manufacturing jobs back. We
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: can't see wages rise, we can't see Nobody hates taxes
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: more than me. I despise. When taxes go up, I
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: think it'll kill jobs. I am worried about all of that.
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: That's not keep me up at night kind of fear.
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: What actually has me worried about twenty twenty are the
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: big changes, the changes that are more radical than we've
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: seen before, the changes that won't be so easy to undo.
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: Is there a real risk of that kind of stuff?
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: So listen, I think the very first priority Democrats will
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: have is stay in power forever. Yeah, So I think
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: they will look at structural changes. How do they structurally
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: make it so they can never lose? Can they do that?
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: I mean they haven't done that before. They haven't, but
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: they rarely had the majorities and you mean majorities in House, Senate, presidency,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: and the ability to force it through. They've always been
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: checks on it. So for example, all right, we wake
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: up January twenty twenty one, Ernie Sanders is president. Yeah,
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer's majority leader, Nancy Pelosius Speaker of the House.
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: I think one of the first things that happens is
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: they end the filibuster. So the philip you know, the
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: filibuster is one of these terms that everybody kind of
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: knows what it means. But what is the what is
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: the meaning of the filibuster? What has it meant for
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: American politicals? So look, historically, the filibuster meant unlimited debate.
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: It meant you could stand up and talk as long
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: as you want, what I did in twenty thirteen in Obamacare.
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: And when people think of filibuster, they they think of
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: Jimmy Stewart standing up and you know, get doing this
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: long long filibuster. What it means is a practical matter
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: though in the Senate, is that to take up any
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: legislation you need sixty votes. What it means is the
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: minority has a veto even in you're not controlling the Senate,
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: but you've got enough votes that you can slow things down. Right,
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: That's how the Senate is operated on legislation. It has
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: been a tool over and over again to just slow
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: things down. Yeah, what's changed? So when Obama was president
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: that there was a period. So there was a brief
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: period where they had a Democratic supermajority, they had sixty votes,
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: and that's when they took up Obamacare. That's when they
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: were ramming things through when they had sixty votes. And
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: then you remember Ted Kennedy died. Yeah, and that's sixtieth vote.
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: You remember who got elected a Republican in massachusetto Scott Brown,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: And it was a national election because it was holy cow,
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: we got to stop the sixtieth the vote and it
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: was basically a referendum on Obamacare. And the people of
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: Basset choose had said, give us a Republican. When is
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: that last happen? Right? Right, because it just opens the
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: door that doesn't happen a lot that one party controls
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: absolutely everything, and when it does happen, they can get
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: through major transformational legislation like Obamacare. So when they fell
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: to fifty nine, there were some old bull Democrats who
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: wouldn't head the filibuster. It was just it was a
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: different Democratic Party in two thousand and nine than it
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: is in twenty twenty. Oh. Yeah, absolutely, you can see
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: that the Democratic caucus in the Senate, every one of
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: them woud vote to end the filibuster. By the way,
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: we saw them do that with Harry Reid when they
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: ended the filibuster on judges. This is what makes me
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: very nervous about it because for so long the filibuster
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: was sacred because whatever party had the majority knew that
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: eventually one day they'd be in the minority. So all right,
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: let's assume you're Chuck Schumer's political strategist. Yeah, and your
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: objective is stay in power forever. What do you want
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: to do? You want to number one, change the electorate.
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: You want to change who's voting. What's the easiest way
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: to do that? Illegal immigration, but not just illegal immigration.
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: Make everyone here illegally citizens. Yes, the estimates vary, eleven million,
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: twelve million. I've seen estimates as high as eighteen twenty
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: million people here illegally. No one really knows. But I
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: think right at the top of the priority list is
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: make as many illegal aliens as possible citizens and voters instantaneously,
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: because those those new voters are much more likely to
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: vote for I think they're convinced they will vote Democratic.
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: And by the way, that's not true with Hispanic voters generally.
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: I mean in Texas, I get over forty percent of
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: the Hispanic vote in Texas. Yeah, I did in twenty twelve,
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: I did in twenty eighteen. But those are legal Hispanic citizens.
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: Those are people who followed the rules. The Democrats have
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: gone all in on gambling that illegal aliens are going
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: to vote demos. So that's a big structural change, ending
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: the filibuster, and then through that, if they control everything,
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: you get amnesty for maybe tens of millions of people.
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: And think about the voting consequences where illegal aliens concentrated. Florida, Yeah,
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: Florida turns bright blue and never votes Republican again. Texas,
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: Texas becomes a Democratic state, North Carolina, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: If Republicans lose Texas, we're never becoming prisoners. Game over.
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: If they just that, Let's assume they do nothing else.
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: They enact the filibuster and they make twelve million illegal
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: alien citizens. Game over for US at the national level.
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: And you don't think Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders want
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: to do that, right of course. So let's talk about
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: the Senate. If they take the Senate, let's assume they
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: have fifty one fifty two Democratic senators I think high
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: on their list. Get more Democratic senators. How do you
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: get you're going to annex Greenland. They won't do that.
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: Trump will, mostly because they made fun of Trump for us.
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: I have to admit it was a very interesting idea.
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: But but you know what they can do. They can
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: make the District of Columbia state Washington d C Washington DC.
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: And by the way, Washington DC is like an eighty
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: five percent democratic city. You want a state guaranteed to
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: elect Democrats for all eternity, DC as a state would
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: be the most liberal state. They've proposed it before. Joe
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: Lieberman proposed it right before you left the Senate. And
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: so if you're Chuck Schumer, you make DC a state
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: and suddenly you get two brand new Democratic senators that
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: will never lose. Right Puerto Rico becoming a state now,
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: it's interesting. There's some debate. You get debate whether if
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: Puerto Rico is a state, would they elect Republicans, would
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: they elect Democrats. I don't know the answer to that,
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: but I can tell you that the Democratic Party thinks
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: they'd elect Democrats, thinks it would be a win for them.
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: So you could have a situation with some real probability
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: that you add four Democratic senators and then suddenly you're
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: trying to say, how do you get the Senate back?
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: And instead of being down fifty one forty nine, you're
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: down fifty six forty nine. Yeahty nine, don't I did?
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: No one told me, they'd be maths um. Okay. So
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: so not only that, Let's take a big priority of
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: Democrats right now. And I think one of the first
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: bills they would pass if they take control, which is
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: national instantaneous voter registration. No, no, that look that sounds
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: kind of boring, Okay, right right, So right now it's
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: a voter registration is done by the states, and you've
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: got to sign up state for local level, and there
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: are a lot of state and local levels that combat
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: voter fraud. Yeah, the Democrats want a federal takeover. They
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: want to put the states and local governments out of
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: the election business. Why and make everyone immediately an eligible voter,
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: because they don't it's the same reason they fight photo ID.
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: They don't want to see y d on voting because
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: it's harder to steal election. It. You want to talk
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: about structurally ensuring they stay in past. You know, we're
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: seeing them do this at the local level where I
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: am in California, where I am when I'm not in Washington,
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: they pass these laws, motor voter laws, so you get
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: instantaneous registration at the DMV. You even see ballot harvesting.
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: So this idea. Oh and By the way, I wouldn't
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: put it past them to have electronic voting, to have
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: number one a holiday, a mandated federal holiday on election
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: day and electronic voting, because you know, we've we've seen
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: how well that worked in Iowa. They'll have the same guy,
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: Robbie Luke who what a name? Who worked for missus Clinton.
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: He was he was Hillary Clinton, I guess her campaign manager,
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: and he was behind that app that completely botched the
• 15:53
  Speaker 1: Iowa caucus. So instead we'll just have the entire elections
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: run through an app. But don't worry. If it's not
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: democratic operatives running the app, it'll be big tech. Because
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: we can trust big tech to be in charge. They
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: would never censor. Conservatives have a political bias, and as
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: bad as they are now, yeah, in a democratic, in
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: a Bernie Sanders administration, they would. I am not exaggerating
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: when I say this podcast could very well be off
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: the air well because social media, these big tech companies,
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: they go after conservatives even when the Republicans have the Senate,
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: when you can grill them, drag them to the Capitol,
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: which I've done a bunch of which you have, in particular,
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: you've done a lot and when Republicans have the White House,
• 16:43
  Speaker 1: so you're saying, and the Department of Justice and the
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: Executive branch, so they're nervous. Look big Tech right now
• 16:48
  Speaker 1: doesn't want DJ to break them up under the antitrust laws. Yeah,
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: you get Bernie Sanders in power, they're going to come in.
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: Look a lot of the Democrats. When do you remember
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: when Mark Zuckerberg testified the Senate and they were like
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: forty five senators. It was the Commerce Committee and Judiciary Committee.
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: I was one of them that grilled Mark Zuckerberg. Just
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: about every senator grilldon both Democrats and Republicans. It was
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: actually a fascinating moment, but if you listened, it was
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: like two ships passing in the night, because what the
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: Democrats were saying was why the hell did you let
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump win? So they weren't say. What the Republicans
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: were saying is why are you censoring people? What the
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: Democrats were saying as when Republicans were kind of meandering
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: around like, so what's this internet thinging? Again? As it was,
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: it was not the most effective cross examination in the
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: history of the Senate, but the Democrats were calling for
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: more censorship that they were saying, you let these crazy
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: conservatives speak and look what happened, and they'll put it
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: in the frame of let's stop lying, and so they'll
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: they'll tell big tech, big tech's already going down this road,
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: but but imagine it accelerated with the federal government. They
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: define as a lie anything they disagree with right Medicare
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: for all is is bad. That's a lie where we're
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: just going to say you can't you can't lie, and
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: that means you can't disagree. Dievery read nineteen eighty four.
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: I did, yeah, George, orwell, so I actually read nineteen
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: eighty four. In nineteen eighty four, I was in eighth grade.
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: I actually thought it was totally cool. Mister Waugh was
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: our teacher. He assigned nineteen eighty four. In nineteen eighty four,
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: We're all like, all right, that's that's kind of cool.
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: But but you remember the propaganda. We're at war with Eurasia.
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: We've always been at war with Eurasia. This is the
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: totalitarian government. They're always just saying we're at war with
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: your Asia. We've always But but then they switch it,
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: they switch it to it, and and suddenly what what
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: was said in the past is no longer operative, right,
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: Big tech has that kind of power. They control information,
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: They disappear you and and and then throw in our
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: economic policies, not just repealing the tax cuts, massive new taxes,
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: I mean crushing new taxes, regulatory Who do you think
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: who do you think will be epa administrator? I dread
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: your answer. How about AOC? Oh? No? Oh no, And
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: I'm not exaggerating it. If you have a President Sanders
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: or a President Warren, why wouldn't they put someone like
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: Alexandro Caja Cortez in So I when I asked you
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: what was at stake here? I was kind of hoping
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: you would just tell me they're going to raise your taxes.
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: And I'm gonna hate that, but I'll get over it.
• 19:35
  Speaker 1: This is sufficiently terrifying that before all of this happens
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: and they shut down everybody who writes into the mail bag.
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: Attorney General Kamala here, No, I don't, I can't hear anymore.
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court Justice Barack Obama, No, you don't mean that.
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: And by the way, not just one. Look, the Democrats
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: are talking about packing the Supreme Court, in other words,
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: expanding it from nine the number they're talking about. It's
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: to fifteen justices, so six brand new. I am terrified.
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: At the end of all, I am the thought of
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court Justice Barack Obama alone would be enough. So
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: before all of this happens, and before we have to go,
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: I want to get to a mail back question, before
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: all of our listeners are censored from Bill, what is
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: the most important thing for you to accomplish in the
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: Senate after all of this impeachment stuff blows over. Let's
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: take two phases between now an election day. We're going
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: to confirm judges, keep confirming good effective judge, pretty good.
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: And the most important thing I'll do is is defend
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: the principles of liberty. It's why we're doing this podcast.
• 20:39
  Speaker 1: It's why I'm trying to engage. Is take on socialism,
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: fight back on the forces that are trying to strip
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: our liberty, defend free enterprise, and defend the Constitution. More broadly,
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: in terms of policy, the legislation I'm most proud of
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: having passed is legislation that I introduced part of the
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: tax cut bill that expanded school choice. I think school
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: choice it is the most important civil rights issue facing
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: America now. For a lot of people, it's their only
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: ticket out of poverty. And you know, President Trump during
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: the State of the Union called on Congress to pass
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: my school choice legislation. That it's a hundred billion dollars
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: in federal tax credits for businesses and for individuals that
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: contribute to scholarship granting organizations that are giving scholarships to
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: kids K through twelve and also to adults in vocational training.
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: One hundred billion dollars. You want to talk about transformational, Yeah,
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: education is a gateway and if we empower kids to
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: choose the school that's best for them, that that has
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: the ability to change the world. But unfortunately, now the
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: Democrats have the House, the set that Republicans have the Senate,
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: so there's not going to be a lot of legislating.
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: Last question, that won't happen between now an election day.
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: But if we have a good, good election in twenty twenty,
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: I think it can and there's a chance we could
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: get I mean, and that I guess that gets to
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: the whole point of the show is there is so
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: much at stake here. Last question is just a personal
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: question from Alex. Does it bother you that the impeachment
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: vote could have been taken three minutes after the start
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: of all of this, and it would have produced the
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: same results. You know, it actually doesn't. There was a
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: lot of debate early on and online about should we
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: do a motion to dismiss at the outset? Yeah, and
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: I thought that was an ill advised strategy. Why a
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: couple of reasons. Number One, if we'd done a motion
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: to dismiss at the outset, I think we probably would
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: have lost it. I think some of the wobbly Republicans
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: that we had to work to get they weren't there
• 22:44
  Speaker 1: at the outset of this. We had to get them.
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: They wanted the process to play out. But number two,
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: we all saw that the House was a kangaroo court. Yeah.
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: I don't think it actually would have served the constitution
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: or the country for the Senate to be seen as
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: a kangaroo cord or in fact be one. And so
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: just throwing it out on day one, I think we
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: had a responsibility to say we're going to do a
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: fair trial. The House is voted that constitutionally is a
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: big deal. Even if you did it abusively, it's a
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: big deal when the House votes out articles of impeachment.
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: We're gonna have a fair trial. We're going to hear
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: from both sides. You can present your case, we will
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: listen to your case, and we're going to follow the law.
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: I think that was the right way to do it.
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: And the other reason why I like it just personally
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: is because by dragging it out, it actually was very instructive.
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: I guess that's the whole point of this podcast was
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: to be instructive on what is really happening, what impeachment means,
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: how it works. Unfortunately, this episode of the podcast has
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: instructed me of all the many horrors that could befall
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: us after November. So I'm probably not going to sleep
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: between now and our next podcast. But it's a lot
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: to think on and it's important to know what the
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: stakes really are. That's all the time we have. I'm
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz the m
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: Fort