Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Democrats want to trade a Trump indictment for a Biden indictment, so they can get rid of a Biden re-election campaign!

Transcript

Democrats want to trade a Trump indictment for a Biden indictment, so they can get rid of a Biden re-election campaign! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Yesterday, I talked about a new theory that seems very
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: quickly to be turning into reality, and that is that
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump will be indicted very soon after election day,
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: and Hunter Biden will also be indicted very soon after
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: election day. The idea is, we can invite, we can
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: indict Donald Trump because we indicted Hunter Biden. So it
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: proves the DOJ Americ Garland is somehow non political, and
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: that somehow he is saying, look, I'm even going after
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: the president Son, while I'm going after former President Donald Trump.
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: There is new indications now, and this is coming from
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: The Hill newspaper, that the GOP is quote bracing for
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: a Trump indictment right after the election. Republican aids and
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: stratagists privately expect Attorney General Garland to pursue an indictment
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: former President Donald Trump within sixty to ninety days after
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: the election, predicting the window for prosecuting Trump will close
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: once the twenty twenty four Press Central campaign gains momentum
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: quote unquote, Republican aids on Capitol Hill and veteran party
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: strategists emphasized they don't have any inside information on what
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: Garland might do, but they say, the Attorney General is
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: under heavy pressure from Democrats to act on the deadline
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: for pursuing an indictment that is fast approaching. Gop aids
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: also warned that an indictment of Trump by the Biden
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: administration would further polarize the nation, likely strengthened Trump's support
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: from the Republican Party's base, as the former president and
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: his allies would frame the Department of Justice's prosecution as
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: a political witch hunt. And that's exactly where the hunter
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: Biden acts aspect of this comes in. They understand how
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: unprecedented it would be and how shocking it would be
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: for them to indict Donald Trump. They need cover. You
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: know what the cover is. The cover is, all right, well,
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: we got a drug addict and we're going to charge
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: him with lying on a for a gun. We're going
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: to charge him with some tax crimes. That's Hunter Biden.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: It will also insulate Joe Biden if we only charge
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: him those basic crimes. It's part of the reason why
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: Ron Johnson and why Chuck Grassley have been coming out
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: and giving more and more information from the whistleblowers so
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: that they can basically, in essence, screw up this plan.
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: By the DOJ to refuse to actually look at the
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: real crimes that we're being committed. Now. I will say
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: this now, and I mean this, and I hope you
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: understand it, and I hope you will agree with me.
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: I don't give a crap anymore about Hunter Biden. I
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: care about all the info that connects him to the
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: President of the United States America because Hunter Biden would
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: have never gotten a paycheck doing what he was doing
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: for a living without him doing it with his father.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: It is impossible for the Russians and those in Mexico
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: and those in Latin America and those in China to
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: do the deals they did with Hunter Biden and James
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: Biden without the father's influence and without the father being involved,
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: and without the father being the big guy, and without
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: the father getting his cut. That's what I know. This
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: is not about Hunter Biden, and we need to move
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: past that very quickly. If there's an indictment of Hunter
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: Biden on these basic charges, it is a victory for
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. Know that, understand it, And the
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: idea that we're gonna that the DOJ has covered now
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: is a brilliant one for them, right We indicted Hunter Biden,
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: and we indicted Donald Trump. So it's fair. It's not
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: fair unless you're indicting Joe Biden. Still, it would not
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: even be close to comparable. It's a drug addict, it's
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: a kid of a politician, and if you only indict
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: him on those things, you're actually protecting the politician, which
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: is Joe Biden. Now, before I get into that part
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: of the story, I want to tell you a little
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: bit about my good friends over at Patriot Mobile. If
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: you are ready to have an impact every time that
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: you use your phone, and I'm talking about have an
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: impact by supporting First and Second Amendment rights, supporting the
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: rights of the unborn, and fighting back every time you
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: make a phone call, you need to know about Patriot Mobile.
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile is America's only conservative Christian mobile phone provider,
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: and they are using your phone bill when you paid
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: every month, to actually fight for conservative causes while saving
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: you money. Now, this isn't any extra ad onto your bill.
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: They take a portion of your bill every month and
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: they give it back to fund conservative causes in Canada,
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: to believe in the sanctity of life, freedom of speech,
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: and the Second Amendment. And they are winning. Patriot Mobile
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: has now been attacked by the big media. Big Tech
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: is now coming after them, and that's why I want
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: you to support them. If you want an affordable plan
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: and you want to get the same great coverage you
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: have right now, switch to Patriot Mobile. You're gonna save money.
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: They use the same exact towers you're using right now.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: It's an affordable plan for you and your family, are
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: even your business or small business. They offer the same
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: nationwide coverage as the major carriers because they use the
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: same towers. If you haven't found out about Patriot Mobile,
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: check them out Patriotmobile dot com, slash ferguson that's Patriot
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash ferguson, or call them nine to
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: seven to Patriot you'll get free activation with the offer
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: code ferguson nine seven to Patriot check them out. If
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: this starts to get Harry because of all the whistleblowers
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: coming out and all the info that's coming out from
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: Grassley and all the information that's coming out from Senator Johnson,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: if it continues to get Harry, then the Democrats are
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: in a very tough spot because they have a choice
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: they're gonna have to make. They can either defend Joe
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: Biden at all costs, or they can say, you know what,
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: he's our useful idiot that's no longer useful. The majority
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: of Democrats have zero desire want to make this very
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: clear for Joe Biden to be the nominee next time.
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: They don't believe that he is electable, and they believe
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: that he's bringing down the ticket on the Democratic side.
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: It is a big issue. It's a big problem. They
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: may dispose politically of Joe Biden and just say, all right,
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: let him, you go after him and nail him, and
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: will say that this was a family matter, not a
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: Democrat issue. There's a family issue, and let him go,
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: and we'll just let the Republicans have him. They know
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: he's corrupt. Now this may serve their purpose, and that's
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: the only way I can describe it, is that it
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: would serve their purpose. But if they decide to defend him,
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: then they've got to defend him at all costs. And
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: when they defend him, they have to do it in
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: a way that makes sense. They have to do it
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: in a way that will allow for people to understand
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: that they believe that Joe Biden is the president that
• 6:46
  Speaker 1: he should be the president for another four years. They're
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: going to have to sell that to the American people,
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: which is exactly why I believe these indictments are probably
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: coming against Donald Trump. They want him and they want
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: to take him out of the race for the White House. Now,
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: this goes back to something that Center Tech Cruz said
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: to rembark Roma on Fox News. Listen, the evidence of
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: corruption is now becoming overwhelming, and we've seen in the
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: last month the Biden Department of Justice actively leaking that
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: it intends to indict Hunter Biden. And I have to
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: say those leaks are troubling on three different bases. Number One,
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: the Department of Justice shouldn't be leaking anything that is
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: against the law to the extent they're revealing grand jury
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: secrets that is in fact a criminal offense, and they're
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: playing politics, they're not engaging law enforcement. Number Two, the
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: substance of what they've leaked is that they're looking at
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden for drug offenses and tax offenses. Now listen,
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: by any measure, Hunter Biden is a deeply troubled soul,
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: a soul who has struggled with addiction his whole life.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: What is concerning about their focus on the drug and
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: tax issues is it is very carefully walling off why
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: this is a matter of public concern. If Hunter Biden
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: was just a regular guy who struggled with addiction, it
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: wouldn't be a matter of public interest. The reason it
• 8:00
  Speaker 1: is a matter of public interest is there is significant
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: and in fact overwhelming evidence that Hunter Biden was actively
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: involved in official corruption with his father, Joe Biden, and
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: that involves both Ukraine and the natural gas company Barissma
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: that paid Hunter Biden eighty three thousand dollars a month
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: when he spoke no Ukrainian and knew nothing about oil
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: and gas, and his father was actively doing favors on
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: behalf of the oligarch who was paying Hunter Biden, and
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: likewise China, Communist China paying Hunter Biden and his family
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: over five million dollars including we now know ten percent
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: for the big guy, ten percent for Joe Biden. And
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: the fact that the bidendj is saying, oh, this is
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: all a drug matter. Don't pay attention to the big guy,
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: don't pay attention to the corruption. Just make it one
• 8:50
  Speaker 1: poor person struggling with addiction. That's highly concerning. And the
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: third reason this is very troubling. Is I think all
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: of this is a prelude to doing what Joe Biden
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: and Merritt Garland want to do, which is indict Donald Trump.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: And they want to be able to say, look, how
• 9:05
  Speaker 1: even handed we are. We indicted Hunter Biden, we indicted
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump, we indict everybody. And that is politics, not
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: law enforcement, politics not law enforcement. He's right, and they're
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: planning this, and I think that's why you need to
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: be careful not to be excited about a Hunter Biden indictment,
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: especially if that Hunter Biden indictment is as simple as
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: it was just explained, If it is just these two
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: things that actually insulate the president of the United States
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: of America, then you understand why. Now let me go
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: back to the article I mentioned earlier, The Hill magazine,
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: the Hill newspaper, This is Insider Hill, Washington, DC. They
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: said that gopa's also warmed. An indictment of Trump by
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: the Biden administration would further polarize the nation. It would
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: strengthen Trump's support. Now, Democrats may be in favor of
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: that because they can't imagine that Donald Trump could actually
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: win an election if he is indicted. It would take
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: him out, and if it rises the country. I'm not
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: sure that they're not okay with that because think about
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: the talking point. If you're a Democrat running for office, right,
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: you got you know, the Republicans are so out of touch.
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: They've got a gaya that's indicted for stealing, you know,
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: top secret documents, YadA YadA, YadA, whatever it is, and
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: they can run on that, they can campaign, they can
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: fundraise on it. A couple weeks after the election. I
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: assume one says that Garlan will indict Trump, said one
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: veteran Republican AID, expressing a sentiment shared by several other
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: gop aids and strategists. Second Republican AID warren an indictment
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: could actually end up helping the former president politically, but
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: it could also help the Democrats. At the same time.
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: People have been talking about splintering support and damping enthusiasm
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: among Republican voters for him. An indictment can actually galvanize
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: and reunify Republicans around him, said another AID, predicting Republican backlashing.
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: Indictment would be stronger if Garlan brings an indictment later
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four elections cycle. In other words, if
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: you wait longer than people will be even more angry
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: about it. That is true. But again it may play
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: for the Democrats, and it may play for them in
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: the mid terms. Now, I do believe that Democrats want
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: to get rid of Joe Biden and they do not
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: want him to run for reelection. It's not the gaffs,
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: by the way, that is making Democrats want to get
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: rid of Joe Biden, or not be able to find
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: his way off the stage. It's even when he's coherent,
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: he's not saying the right things. A given example, this
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: was a very coherent response when he was at a
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: press gaggle and he was asked about Fetterman. Now, as
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: you know, Fetterman had a terrible debate. He started a
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: debate by saying literally good night. Okay, said good night
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: to start off a debate. That's a bad moment. Okay,
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: that's a bad moment for anybody. And it was an
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: incoherent It was a god awful debate and everybody he
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: knew it was. There's not really any Democrats out there
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: that are defending how bad the Fetterman debate was. And
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden defends it and says he did a great job,
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: which makes people look at the debate even more and
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: they're like, uh no, no, it wasn't a great debate. Listen, Yeah,
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: I thought he was really good. I thought he knew
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: what he was doing. I thought he was strong. I
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: thought he knew what he was doing, and I thought
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: he was strong. No one thought he knew what he
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: was doing. Okay, No one thought that he was good
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: at doing. No one thought that he was strong. As
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: he just described it, the debate was a disaster. And
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: these are those moments that even when he's coherent, democrats
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: are like, come on, man, like give us something here,
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: and then he goes on to say this, look is Pennsylvania.
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: I mean, Fetterman is everything that he appears to be
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: to know where he stands. He has a great courage,
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: he has no reluctant to say what he thinks. He's
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: my kind of guy. He's my kind of guy. You
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: know where he stands. Fetterman doesn't know where he stands.
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: We know this from that debate. Fetterman on fracking was
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: a perfect example. They asked him that that question on fracking,
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: and he couldn't tell you what he wanted to say
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: on the issue of fracking. He had no idea what
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: he was saying on fracking, and that's why people watch
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: it and they're like, dude, how can you say this
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: guy's good? Listen to this on fracking with Fetterman, Okay,
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: and you'll understand when the president said he's coherent, No,
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: he's not. In a twenty eighteen interview, you said, quote,
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: I don't support fracking at all. I never have. But
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: earlier this month you told an interview or quote, I
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: support fracking. I support the energy independence that we should
• 13:54
  Speaker 1: have here in the United States. I've always supported fracking,
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: and I always believe that independence with our energy is
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: critical that we can't be held, you know, ransom to
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: somebody like Russia. But there is that twenty eighteen interview
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: that you said, quote, I don't support fracking at all.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: So how do you square the two? Oh, I do
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: support fracking and I don't. I don't. I support fracking
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: and I stand and I do support fracking. I mean,
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: that's that's their best guy. And then Joe Biden's defending that,
• 14:29
  Speaker 1: saying it's amazing that this is the this is the
• 14:32
  Speaker 1: Democratic party that you want. Now you understand why Democrats
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: genuinely want to get rid of him. I think they
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: also believe that they're never going to get away from
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden scandal, even if the DOJ indicts him
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: on things that do not connect him to the present,
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: because remember, a big investigation in the House and Senate
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: may expose things. But as but as it's been said
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: several times here and Republican have said this, we can investigate,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: but we cannot indict, and that's one of the big problems. Well,
• 15:07
  Speaker 1: we're gonna one week after the election, we're coming back
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: to Washington for the lame duck session. The House Oversight
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: Committee is going to have a press conference. We're gonna
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: be very transparent with the American people on the work
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: we've done thus far. We're gonna outline exactly what we've
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: uncovered thus far pertaining to Hunter Biden shady business dealings
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: as well as suspicious activity on behalf of the president's brothers.
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: We're also going to re reshow to the American people
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: that outside of the conservative media that have seen the
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: text messages and emails that showed that Hunter said to
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: numerous people that he kept his father up he was
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: sick and tired of having to pay for the living
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: expenses of his father, which kind of would lead one
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: to believe that Joe Biden has benefited directly from Hunters.
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: What does that look like? Does Hunter testify before the
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: Oversight Committee's does Biden brother testify? I mean, we're seeing
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: a lot of investigations right now, where with January six
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: and all that, So who comes to Capitol Hill and
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: talks to the American people. We're gonna ask for Hunter
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: Biden to come. He will probably receive a subpoena. We're
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: going to ask the President's brothers to come. But at
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: the very beginning, we know that we're gonna have several depositions.
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: We're going to have several transcribed interviews. We want to
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: talk to the bankers that issued the one hundred and
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: fifty suspicious activity reports or the bank violation to Hunter Biden.
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: We've got two witnesses that were former associate of Hunter
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: Biden that have volunteered to come in and do transcribed
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: interviews with us. So we're gonna start there. We plan
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: on having our first hearing sometime in mid January. We
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: need to do a little more background information. Remember I've
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: requested these bank violations for several months. The last time,
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: Treasury Department Janet Yelling sent me a letter saying that,
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: well she couldn't give it to us because we weren't
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: in the majority. Well we're going to send her a
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: letter on November nine, say, if you haven't heard, the
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: Republicans are going to be in the majority in January.
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: So now we expect those bank violations. Once we have
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: those bank violations, and I have two of the one
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty right now, and I can tell you
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: they're really bad, Lawrence, we don't have to prove the
• 17:14
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's a shady business character. I think the American
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: people understand that there are going to be more people
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: like John Stewart come forward and start throwing Hunter under
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: the bus after the disastrous midterms that the Democrats are
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: going to have. We're investigating Hunter Biden because we believe
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: he's compromised Joe Biden. That's the key point there. We're
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: investigating him because we believe he's compromised Joe Biden. That
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: is the ball game, and so in the catalyst for
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: Democrats decide who their guy is right their big run
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: up to the next presidential election, which we're two years
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: away from They've got to decide can he get around
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: all of this and will people forgive him for selling
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: out America? And there are more and more Democrats now
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: that I believe, do not think that he can handle it,
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: the scrutiny. I don't believe that they believe that they
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: can overcome this. So then the question is, if you're
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: a Democrat, who do you want to be your next leader?
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: It's not Joe Biden, He's a liability. Who is the
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: next leader? I think that leader they understand is not
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: Kamala Harris either. So if you can bring down their presidency,
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: and you can do it quickly so that you can
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: move on to the next one, they may sacrifice him
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: for that reason. That might be the best option that
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: they have. It actually may be their only chance at success.
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: I don't think that you're going to be able to
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: turn this economy around quickly. The amount of spending that
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: the Democrats have done. They don't seem to show any
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: indication whatsoever that they want to change. They want to
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: alter course, they want to move right into a direction
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: of fiscal responsibility. That is one thing that I think
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: is very apparent in all of this. So how do
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: you move forward, do you sacrifice him? Do you say
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: he's been a great guy for us for a long time,
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: He's towards the end of his life anyway, based on age.
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: Let's give him a parachute, a way to get out.
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: Let's give him an opportunity to quasi save his son,
• 19:28
  Speaker 1: to make sure he doesn't run and will protect you
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: and defend you. If I'm Joe Biden, there's a certain
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: point where that becomes I think the reality of your situation.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: If Democrats decide not to keeping like idiots in defending
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: you no matter what. They've lost Twitter, by the way,
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: and I do believe they're starting to lose the media.
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: Not because the media wants to be transparent, Okay. The
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: reason why they're losing the media is because the media
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: wants to w in the next presidential election. They don't
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: want a Rond de Sciantists. They don't want a Donald Trump,
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: they don't want a Ted Cruz, right, and I think
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: they understand that it's going to be extremely hard to
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: get anyone else elected if he's around them. And I'm
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: talking about the local level, I'm talking about the state level.
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: I'm talking about the national level. He is going to
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: drag down the ticket. I want to get back into
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: what I was saying about. You know, Joe Biden no
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: longer being the useful idiot of the Democratic Party. Okay.
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: I also believe that the Democratic Party is moving away
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: from Joe Biden. And I'm talking about politicians like Joe Biden.
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: Why do I say that they want more extreme candidates.
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden is not that extreme and he's not extreme
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: enough for them when it comes to attacking police and
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: different organizations that are for law, law in order for
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: structure in America. A great example of this is Stacy
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: Abrams and Georgia. The fact that Stacy Abrams and Georgia
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: plays in Georgia, which is a I would refer to
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: it more of a red state, maybe purple asque, but
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: it's been more conservative than liberal over the years, and
• 21:19
  Speaker 1: the fact that the Democrats keep choosing her to be
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: their candidate tells you a lot about what they want
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: in their candidates. Stacy Abrams just went off on all
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: of the sheriffs in the entire state of Georgia, and
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: not a single Democrat has come out and reprimanded her
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: or has disavowed these comments where she said while all
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: these sheriffs just want to be able to take black
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: people off the streets. In other words, they're all whites,
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: and I hate all of these sheriffs in the state
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: of Georgia, which I'm supposed to represent. She is their
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: nominee for governor, and she declared during this debate with
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: a Republican Kemp on Sunday night that the one hundred
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: and seven sheriffs stead have endorsed her opponent, the incumbent
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: Republican Brian Kemp. She said, the reason why they do
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: is because they want to be able to take black
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: people off the street. Now you're gonna hear Governor Kemp. First,
• 22:14
  Speaker 1: you're gonna hear what he has to say about all
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: the people that support him, and then you will hear
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: this assault on everybody in law enforcement as she goes
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: scorts to earth. And this is what Democrats want now,
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: this is what they are advocating for. This is why
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: I think they're ready to be done with Joe Biden
• 22:31
  Speaker 1: eminating cash bill. Men and women in law enforcement know
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: who is going to be with them, who has had
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: their back and will continue to have their back, and
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: that is me. And that's why we have the endorsement
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: of one hundred and seven sheriffs around the state. As
• 22:45
  Speaker 1: I pointed out before, I'm not a member of the
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: good old boys club. So no, I don't have one
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: hundred and seven sheriffs who want to be able to
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: take black people off the streets, who want to be
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: able to go without accountability. I don't believe every sheriff
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: wants that, but I do know that we need a
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: governor who believes in both defending law enforcement but also
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: defending the people of Georgia. I have two brothers, one
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: who has committed crimes and one who is a social
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: worker trying to help keep people from committing crimes. But
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: my brother, who commits crimes should be held accountable, but
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: my other brothers should never be pulled over for driving
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: while black. And yet in this Georgia he is. I'm
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: running for governor because we'd lead complicated lives, and we
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: need a governor who's willing to hold law enforcement accountable
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: but also be supportive. And yes, pay races have been
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: given to state law enforcement, but local law enforcement are
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: experiencing shortages that are not being funded by this governor
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: and federal COVID money as a bonus is not the
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: same as a plan for their investment. And I'm the
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: only one with a clear plan to invest in local
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: law enforcement going forward. So she's gonna invest. But everybody
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: that pulls over somebody in Georgia that's African American is
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: automatically a racist, and the one hundred and seven sheriffs
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: are all racists. But I've got a plan to give
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: the races more money. This is the Democratic Party. And
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: even Joe Biden, I don't believe can keep up with
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: this level of extremism at his age. I don't believe
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: he thinks that this is probably what he should be saying.
• 24:13
  Speaker 1: I think most people believe this is not what should
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: be said. Right now. Will you go out there and
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: you indict every single law enforcement official the way that
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: it was just said is radical? That's what they want, though,
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: So can they get rid of Joe Biden? Can they
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: say we must move on from him? And if they're
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: going to get rid of him, they've got to do
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: it quickly. They don't want to wait until they miss
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: out on the opportunity to run other candidates. They want
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: a bunch of different candidates to run, and they are
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: not the last named Biden. So after these midterms, this
• 24:47
  Speaker 1: is my prediction. One, they're going to look to indict
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I think that is spot on. Two, they're
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: gonna say, well, well, indict hunter Biden. There's your quid
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: pro quo. Everything should be fine. Now, should understand this, right,
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: this all makes sense? Now, right, everything's good? Okay. I
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: believe that's part two of this. And then they're going
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: to decide quickly when the Republicans get into these investigations,
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: do we take our hands off of him, do we
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: walk away? Do we say have at him, take him down,
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: maybe even impeach him, because if you impeach him, we
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: may be getting rid of their problem. If we impeach
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden, or there's indictments of Joe Biden for the
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: crimes that I believe he is committed, we may be
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: bailing out the Democrats. Give them to get a Joel
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: free card. They get rid of their other problem, which
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: is Kamala Harris. She's not the heir apparent that they want.
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: We should all understand that. They believe she's unelectable. I
• 25:57
  Speaker 1: think they also just believe she's stupid. There's not a
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: lot of Democrats that like working with her. There's a
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: lot of Democrats that think she is a cancer to
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, that she's completely intolerant of staff members.
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: I mean, look at the turnover with her staff. She
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: is a disaster. So they need new names, they need
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: new people, they need people, and I think they would
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: look at someone like a Stacey Abrahams, they would look
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: at a Bateau of Rouric. Again, they want extreme candidates.
• 26:30
  Speaker 1: So can you get rid of all the people that
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: you want to get rid of, and that it means
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: and bringing all the people you want. I think there's
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: a very good chance that could happen. I think it's
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: their goal, their agenda, their objective. This is what they
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: want to happen, and they're willing to try it at
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: all costs, even if that means getting rid of their guy. Now,
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: before I get into anymore the insanity of these people
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: on the left, I want to tell you real quick
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: about legacy precious medals. You know what's happening with inflation,
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: you know what's happening with people now talking about the
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: idea of recession. You know what's happening with supply chain issues,
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: and you know what's been happening with your retirement account.
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: If you are not diversified with part of your financial
• 27:12
  Speaker 1: strategy involving precious metals, now is a time to call
• 27:16
  Speaker 1: the people that I use and trust, Legacy Precious Metals.
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: You can get the free investors Guide on gold and silver,
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: precious metal investing and how to diversify your portfolio. We
• 27:29
  Speaker 1: have seen that they want to raise taxes. We are
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: seeing a skyrocketing of our national debt. And if your
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: retirement is in only investments that are directly connected to
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: the market, you need to take a look at Legacy
• 27:43
  Speaker 1: Precious Metals. Call and get the free investors guide right
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: now from them one eight six six seven five one
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: twenty two eighteen. That's one eight six six seven five
• 27:56
  Speaker 1: one twenty two eighteen. Orne at Legacy PM Investments at
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: Legacy PM Investments dot com. Now, there's one other thing
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: that I want to put on your radar screen that
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: is going to be very significant, and that is that
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is going to hear cases against Harvard
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: and UNC on affirmative action. This has not been getting
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: a lot of play out there. You probably this is
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: the first time you've heard about it, But the US
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court is going to hear oral arguments and a
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: pair of cases that could overturn the use of racial
• 28:33
  Speaker 1: preferences in college admissions. They're focusing on challenges to affirmative
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: action policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: In both of these cases, the plaintiffs and a nonprofit
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: group called Students for Fair Admissions. They are alleging that
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: affirmative action policies discriminate against Asian Americans, who otherwise would
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: comprise a larger share of student bodies at both colleges.
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: But they aren't getting in on the affirmative action action
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: no pun intended, because they are Asian American. Now, what
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: they're challenging is this court case, the University of California
• 29:16
  Speaker 1: versus Bay. It's from back in nineteen seventy eight, and
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: that is when the court permit the use of affirmative
• 29:21
  Speaker 1: action and college admissions to achieve diversity, quote unquote, provided
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: the law said or the ruling said it did not
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: operate like a quota system. That holding was later limited
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: by two cases against the University of Michigan. Back in
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: two thousand and three, now, Grade struck down an undergraduate
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: policy that gave points to applicants solely based on race,
• 29:45
  Speaker 1: and grutter upheld a law school policy that considered race
• 29:49
  Speaker 1: as a factor but did not assign points to the applicants.
• 29:53
  Speaker 1: Now the cases are being heard together, though the one
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: against Harvard involves a private university and the one against
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: University of North Carolina involves a public one. But the
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court is going to hear them together now. The
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: Fourteenth Amendments Equal protection clause only applies to private institutions
• 30:09
  Speaker 1: when they take federal money, and the case against Harvard
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: focuses on civil rights laws, just so you know, and
• 30:16
  Speaker 1: the case against the University of North Carolina is a
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: broader constitutional case. Now, Harvard as one in both the
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: district and the appellate courts, though the case has exposed
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: its affirmative action policies to a lot of scrutiny in
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: the public, revealing that the actual percentage of Asian American
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: students who are admitted is about half of what it
• 30:37
  Speaker 1: would be based on test scores and grades alone. In
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: other words, fifty percent of Asians are losing out on
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: Harvard every single admission cycle because of affirmative action. Harvard
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: was found to use a quote personality test that ranked
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: Asian American groups lower than others. Again, this is so racist.
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: And the University of North Carolina also they won a
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: district court and the case will appeal directly the Supreme
• 31:05
  Speaker 1: Court to join the Harvard case, which they've said yes to. Now.
• 31:08
  Speaker 1: Justice Brown Jackson has recused herself from the Harvard case
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: because she is a member of Harvard. Harvard's board of overseers.
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: Just so you know, this is going to be a
• 31:19
  Speaker 1: big case. It's one that we should all be watching
• 31:22
  Speaker 1: because this could have a huge impact not just on
• 31:25
  Speaker 1: college admissions for all students, but it could also have
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: a very very big impact on affirmative action in general
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: in this country. Now we think about affirmative action, I
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: think the most of the college level, that is not
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: always the case. Affirmative action is at all different levels
• 31:44
  Speaker 1: within our government and it's in also in the private sector.
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: This could open up other lawsuits, and this could open
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: up many different debates, arguments, and court cases that could
• 31:56
  Speaker 1: change the way that we use affirmative action in this country.
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: I think this would be a huge victory for all Americans,
• 32:04
  Speaker 1: especially other minorities like Asian Americans, who are getting half
• 32:08
  Speaker 1: as many people into Harvard, for example, because of these
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: laws and rules. Make sure you share a podcast today.
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: By the way, as we talk so much about Hunter Biden,
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: please write us a five star review as well, and
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: I will see you back here tomorrow