Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / It Is Time To Be Honest SOCIALIST ARE TAKING Over This Country And I Have 4 Examples Just From Today!
Transcript
- 0:00Speaker 1: It is time that we understand what's going on in
- 0:03Speaker 1: this country and stop calling the Democratic Party the Democratic Party.
- 0:07Speaker 1: They're not the Democratic Party anymore. I could deal with
- 0:10Speaker 1: Democrats like Bill Clinton, I could deal with Democrats even
- 0:14Speaker 1: like Joe Biden back in the day. I could deal
- 0:17Speaker 1: with Al Gore. I could deal with Barack Obama even
- 0:20Speaker 1: in his administration. What the Democratic Party is now is
- 0:26Speaker 1: no longer a party that is willing to compromise. It's
- 0:30Speaker 1: not even what the Democratic Party says that they are anymore.
- 0:33Speaker 1: These are two different things. And depending on which Democrat
- 0:38Speaker 1: you're looking at, they are either now a socialists or
- 0:42Speaker 1: they're a communist. Bill Clinton, for example, was not a socialist.
- 0:46Speaker 1: Bill Clinton was not a communist. He was a liberal.
- 0:49Speaker 1: And what we are now seeing happen, and I'm going
- 0:51Speaker 1: to give you three different stories to prove my point
- 0:54Speaker 1: today that we are no longer dealing with a democratic party.
- 0:58Speaker 1: We're no longer dealing with liberalism. We are dealing with
- 1:01Speaker 1: socialists and communists. Now, for you that don't understand the
- 1:06Speaker 1: definition of socialists and for you that don't understand the
- 1:08Speaker 1: exact definition of communist, I'm not saying that in the
- 1:10Speaker 1: negative way. I'm just saying we need to define and
- 1:12Speaker 1: understand what each one is. I'm gonna do that for
- 1:14Speaker 1: you in a moment. But let me go over the
- 1:17Speaker 1: stories right now, the headlines that are proving my point.
- 1:20Speaker 1: Right now, more money going out than ever before. Socialists
- 1:25Speaker 1: and communists of the Democratic Party are now mandating monthly
- 1:30Speaker 1: stimulus checks. Monthly stimulus checks they want to go out
- 1:37Speaker 1: to Americans monthly. Parents will now receive up to three
- 1:41Speaker 1: thousand and six hundred dollars as an annual benefit per
- 1:45Speaker 1: child per child for the twenty twenty one tax year
- 1:49Speaker 1: starting in July. The payments are part of an expanded
- 1:53Speaker 1: socialist child tax credit that was added to the American
- 1:58Speaker 1: one point nine trillion dollars COVID relief plan. Now listen
- 2:04Speaker 1: ten cents of every dollar debt with anything with COVID.
- 2:07Speaker 1: The Internal Revenue Service Commissioner confirmed today that the IRS
- 2:11Speaker 1: is ready to send out the checks this summer. Quote.
- 2:14Speaker 1: We if we IRS end up not being on track
- 2:18Speaker 1: for some unforeseen situation, we'll advise you in the committee.
- 2:22Speaker 1: That's what he told Senator Brown, a Democrat, a socialist
- 2:26Speaker 1: from Ohio and ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee.
- 2:30Speaker 1: So the new tax credit, which is meant to help parents,
- 2:33Speaker 1: they say, claim this is that what the socials are
- 2:35Speaker 1: claiming now the Democratic Party is mental parents paid on
- 2:39Speaker 1: debts and bills. It will now be sent out through
- 2:42Speaker 1: not yearly, but monthly payments from July to December. Now,
- 2:45Speaker 1: let me explain to you why the socialists are doing this.
- 2:48Speaker 1: They're sending out these checks monthly instead of in a
- 2:50Speaker 1: one lump sum because they want you to vote for
- 2:54Speaker 1: these checks to continue moving forward. This is more work,
- 2:59Speaker 1: more money being spent to even get these really program checks.
- 3:03Speaker 1: Who got monthly. They're doing it because they want you
- 3:05Speaker 1: to be addicted to this drug, this United States check
- 3:12Speaker 1: that will come to you in monthly payments from July December,
- 3:16Speaker 1: which they will want to extend after December. I guarantee
- 3:20Speaker 1: it because the midterm elections are just around the corner. Now,
- 3:23Speaker 1: who qualifies for this? Well, the socialists in the Democratic
- 3:27Speaker 1: Party and the communists are smart. If your household was
- 3:30Speaker 1: already qualified for the fourteen hundred dollars stimulus checks, you
- 3:35Speaker 1: will receive half of the tax credit for now and
- 3:37Speaker 1: we'll get the other half as refund as refundable when
- 3:41Speaker 1: you file your twenty twenty one taxes, each household is
- 3:45Speaker 1: set to receive between three thousand to thirty six hundred,
- 3:47Speaker 1: depending on each child's age. Per child, if you are
- 3:51Speaker 1: part of a couple who's making, for example, one hundred
- 3:53Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars a year, or if you are a
- 3:56Speaker 1: single parent who is making under seventy five thousand dollars
- 3:59Speaker 1: a year, you're eligible to receive a two hundred and
- 4:01Speaker 1: fifty dollars monthly payment for each of your children whose
- 4:04Speaker 1: ages range between six years old and seventeen years old.
- 4:08Speaker 1: So if you've got four kids, it's a thousand dollars
- 4:10Speaker 1: check that's going to show up every month from this
- 4:12Speaker 1: summer to the end of the year. Now, if your
- 4:14Speaker 1: child is under the age of six, don't worry. You're
- 4:17Speaker 1: not being left out. You're going to receive more money.
- 4:20Speaker 1: This is how you get young parents addicted to government crack.
- 4:24Speaker 1: This is the government drug that's going to be sent
- 4:28Speaker 1: to you monthly. You will receive a three hundred dollars
- 4:31Speaker 1: monthly payment. This is class warfare coming from the socialists,
- 4:35Speaker 1: from the communists. If you were one of those earning
- 4:39Speaker 1: over seventy five thousand dollars a year individually or one
- 4:41Speaker 1: hundred and fifty thousand dollars is a couple. You will
- 4:44Speaker 1: not receive these full payments because the majority of people
- 4:47Speaker 1: making more than that are going to vote for Republican candidates,
- 4:50Speaker 1: not for the socialists and communist candidates to the Democratic Party.
- 4:53Speaker 1: So they understand where they need to stop these payments,
- 4:56Speaker 1: because this is about buying votes. This is literally what
- 4:59Speaker 1: socialists and what communists do. They get you addicted to
- 5:02Speaker 1: the drug of the government, and that drug of choice
- 5:05Speaker 1: is money that comes every month, so that you will
- 5:08Speaker 1: not vote against him because you don't want that check
- 5:11Speaker 1: to stop showing up. That's why they've cut it off
- 5:14Speaker 1: at seventy five thousand dollars for an individual single parent
- 5:18Speaker 1: or one hundred fifty for a family of two. The
- 5:20Speaker 1: irs has been requested as per the Child Tax Credit
- 5:23Speaker 1: Expansion to set an online PORTERWOL, families can update their
- 5:27Speaker 1: family information, including the number of qualified children in case
- 5:31Speaker 1: of a newborn. So you get a new kid, bam,
- 5:34Speaker 1: you make under seventy five thousands a single parent, or
- 5:36Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty as a group as two parents,
- 5:39Speaker 1: We're going to send you three hundred dollars a month.
- 5:41Speaker 1: Every month. Now, if the irs didn't receive the update
- 5:43Speaker 1: through the portal, you will claim this three thousand or
- 5:47Speaker 1: thirty six hundred dollars tax credit for your new child
- 5:50Speaker 1: when you file your twenty twenty one taxes. This is
- 5:53Speaker 1: buying votes. You need to understand what this is. Now.
- 5:57Speaker 1: Before the tax credit expansion families, an individual would claim
- 6:00Speaker 1: the credit for only as much as two thousand per child,
- 6:03Speaker 1: and only fourteen hundred dollars was refundable. Democrats of the
- 6:07Speaker 1: Socialist Party have now said, We've got a way to
- 6:09Speaker 1: do that. There's example number one of this Democratic Party
- 6:13Speaker 1: no longer being a Democratic party. They are a socialist
- 6:16Speaker 1: or communist party now, and we need to start calling
- 6:19Speaker 1: them what they are. Let me give you another example
- 6:22Speaker 1: of another headline today that is talking about these socialists
- 6:26Speaker 1: and these communists. Look at this Minnesota mayor where this
- 6:30Speaker 1: man who was wanted for choking out a woman, putting
- 6:33Speaker 1: a gun to her and robbing her of her rent money,
- 6:36Speaker 1: who then fought the cops and was accidentally shot by
- 6:39Speaker 1: a police officer instead of her using her taser. You
- 6:43Speaker 1: know what that mayor has done Now he has sees power,
- 6:45Speaker 1: which is what a communist does. It's what a socialist
- 6:48Speaker 1: dictator does. He has sees power over the police department.
- 6:51Speaker 1: He has taken away the power of the police chief,
- 6:54Speaker 1: and the police chief is now resigned. The city council,
- 6:57Speaker 1: which is socialists, communist depending on who you look at
- 7:00Speaker 1: on that city council decided to fire the city manager
- 7:03Speaker 1: for saying that the police officer deserve due process. That's
- 7:05Speaker 1: what a socialist communist government does. And this Minnesota mayor
- 7:10Speaker 1: has now said the police quote do not necessarily need
- 7:13Speaker 1: weapons during traffic stops. This is exactly what socialists and
- 7:17Speaker 1: communists do. They have a breakdown of the safety and
- 7:20Speaker 1: security in their communities on purpose so they can have
- 7:24Speaker 1: chaos so they can grab more power. Remember, without this power,
- 7:28Speaker 1: with this chaos that that was just seen in Minnesota,
- 7:31Speaker 1: this mayor would not have the power to control the
- 7:33Speaker 1: police department. He was not over the police department. But
- 7:36Speaker 1: these emergency powers, which is how socialist and communists gain power.
- 7:41Speaker 1: Use a crisis to grab power, which is what he
- 7:44Speaker 1: just did. And now he's in charge of the police department.
- 7:48Speaker 1: This guy has seized power in his city using chaos,
- 7:52Speaker 1: which is what socialists and communists do. Not only is
- 7:56Speaker 1: this mayor seizing power. He's also a radical in this
- 8:00Speaker 1: standpoint that he doesn't want police officers to be able
- 8:03Speaker 1: to protect and defend themselves. Quote, I don't believe that
- 8:06Speaker 1: officers need to necessarily have weapons every time they're making
- 8:09Speaker 1: a traffic stop, this mayor said. Now, this is the
- 8:11Speaker 1: mayor who has taken over control of the police department
- 8:14Speaker 1: through emergency powers, which is what socialist and communists do.
- 8:18Speaker 1: The mayor also said officers might not need weapons and
- 8:21Speaker 1: other situations as well. I don't believe that officers need
- 8:27Speaker 1: to necessarily have weapons, you know, every time they they're
- 8:35Speaker 1: they're making a traffic stop, or or engaged in situations
- 8:43Speaker 1: that don't necessarily call for for weapons. We know that
- 8:47Speaker 1: there are other many other jurisdictions or even around the
- 8:51Speaker 1: world where that is not you know, necessarily the case
- 8:55Speaker 1: it's not needed. And so I you know, I am
- 8:58Speaker 1: very much interested in receiving This is a man who
- 9:03Speaker 1: is now the de facto police chief because he's taken
- 9:05Speaker 1: over control and power. These comments come shortly after he
- 9:10Speaker 1: assumed command and control of the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
- 9:14Speaker 1: This is your boss, if you're a police officer. Now,
- 9:16Speaker 1: I think what's probably going to happen here. And I
- 9:19Speaker 1: think what this mayor is trying to do in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota,
- 9:25Speaker 1: as a police chief has resigned because he's taken over
- 9:27Speaker 1: control and powers. I think he's probably hoping that a
- 9:30Speaker 1: whole lot a police officers resign because socialists and communists
- 9:35Speaker 1: want chaos so they can seize more power. Right, we
- 9:40Speaker 1: just heard that. We know that that's why he's now
- 9:43Speaker 1: the police chief because of chaos. So the more chaos
- 9:46Speaker 1: there is, the more power he can grab. When you
- 9:50Speaker 1: start pushing this idea, this is not a freedom and
- 9:53Speaker 1: democracy and a safe community idea suggests that the officers
- 9:57Speaker 1: don't need to be armed. That is what a socialist
- 10:01Speaker 1: and a communists would say. Now let me just move
- 10:03Speaker 1: on from there. That's another example of this isn't the
- 10:06Speaker 1: Democratic Party more. This guy, this mayor, is not a Democrat.
- 10:09Speaker 1: He's a socialist or a communist. You get to decide,
- 10:12Speaker 1: and we'll go over the definitions in a moment. But
- 10:16Speaker 1: let's move on to the next example of the no
- 10:18Speaker 1: longer the Democratic Party. I can deal with the Party
- 10:22Speaker 1: of Bill Clinton JFK. Hell, even the Party of Obama.
- 10:27Speaker 1: Socialists in Washington have now unveiled legislation to pack the
- 10:32Speaker 1: Supreme Court with four more justices. Now, let me remind
- 10:37Speaker 1: you of what a democrat said. Okay, this is a
- 10:41Speaker 1: Democrat who said this. You may recognize his voice because
- 10:45Speaker 1: he's now the President of United States of America. What
- 10:47Speaker 1: he had to say during a nineteen eighty three hearing
- 10:50Speaker 1: on this issue. President Roosevelt clearly had the right to
- 10:53Speaker 1: send to the United States Senate the United States Congress
- 10:55Speaker 1: a proposal to pack the court. It was totally within
- 10:59Speaker 1: his right to do that. He violated no law. He
- 11:02Speaker 1: was legalistically absolutely correct. But it was a bone had idea.
- 11:08Speaker 1: It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make, and it
- 11:11Speaker 1: put in question for an entire decade the independence of
- 11:17Speaker 1: the most significant body, including the Congress, in my view,
- 11:21Speaker 1: the most significant body in this country, the Supreme Court
- 11:24Speaker 1: of the United States of America. That's a democrat. That's
- 11:29Speaker 1: a Democrat that understands this. Now, let's talk about the
- 11:34Speaker 1: most liberal judge that recently just passed on the Supreme Court,
- 11:39Speaker 1: A hardcore liberal, not a socialist, not a communist, a
- 11:43Speaker 1: hardcore liberal. Ruth Bader Ginsburg did an interview where she
- 11:49Speaker 1: was asked about court packing. That's a democrat. I can
- 11:52Speaker 1: deal with a democrat. She did a sit down interview
- 11:55Speaker 1: with NPR. Here is what she said in her conversation.
- 12:00Speaker 1: This is it said, it's a terrible idea. You do
- 12:03Speaker 1: not want this in a free country. Or what does
- 12:05Speaker 1: concern you? If you're not worried about the term limits,
- 12:08Speaker 1: what are you worried about? Well, what was that you
- 12:10Speaker 1: mentioned adding the number? Changing the number of jobs? Oh? Yes, yes,
- 12:15Speaker 1: there is no fixed number in the constitution. So this
- 12:18Speaker 1: court has had as few as five, as many as ten.
- 12:23Speaker 1: Nine seems to be a good number, and it's been
- 12:25Speaker 1: that way for for a long time. I have heard
- 12:35Speaker 1: that there are some people on the Democratic side who
- 12:39Speaker 1: would like to increase the number of judges. I think
- 12:49Speaker 1: that was a bad idea. When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
- 12:52Speaker 1: tried to pack the court, his plan was for every
- 12:57Speaker 1: justice who stays on the court pass the age of seventy,
- 13:05Speaker 1: the president would have authority to nominate another justice. If
- 13:11Speaker 1: that plan had been effective, the court's number would have
- 13:16Speaker 1: swelled immediately from nine to fifteen, and the president would
- 13:22Speaker 1: have six appointments. To me, he is mentioned before the
- 13:33Speaker 1: Court appearing partisan. Will If anything would make the court
- 13:36Speaker 1: appear partisan, it would be that one side saying, when
- 13:41Speaker 1: we're in power, was going to enlarge the number of judges,
- 13:46Speaker 1: so we will have more people who will vote the
- 13:49Speaker 1: way we want them to. So I am not at
- 13:59Speaker 1: all in favor of that solution to what I see
- 14:04Speaker 1: is a temporary situated. This is Ruth Bader Ginsburg at
- 14:15Speaker 1: the end of her life, chastising twenty twenty Dems on
- 14:19Speaker 1: the idea of court packing, calling it a bad idea
- 14:22Speaker 1: because she's a liberal. She's not a socialist she was.
- 14:25Speaker 1: She's a liberal, not a communist. She says, this is
- 14:29Speaker 1: what concerns her. This is basically like an exit interview, right,
- 14:34Speaker 1: this is an exit interview. And Ruth Bader Ginsburg understand understood.
- 14:41Speaker 1: Being on the Spring Court, you don't do this. This
- 14:44Speaker 1: is not what you do. This is a terrible idea
- 14:49Speaker 1: for freedom and democracy. You don't pack the court partisan. Meanwhile,
- 14:54Speaker 1: move forward to the Socialist Democratic Party and they are
- 14:58Speaker 1: today unveiling a court packing piece of legislation which is
- 15:02Speaker 1: nothing more than we don't like the Supreme Court. Now
- 15:05Speaker 1: we're in charge, we're going to pack the court a
- 15:08Speaker 1: idea that the President of the United States of America
- 15:10Speaker 1: back in nineteen eighty three, when he was actually a Democrat,
- 15:13Speaker 1: not a socialist like he is today. Biden called it
- 15:16Speaker 1: a bonehead idea. Now, the scary part is, these are
- 15:20Speaker 1: just a couple examples of what's happening today in this
- 15:24Speaker 1: country at the hands of the socialists and the communists
- 15:27Speaker 1: who are now in charge. I have two more examples
- 15:30Speaker 1: for you. Another example for you is this new House
- 15:35Speaker 1: Committee which is trying to bankrupt this country and redistribute
- 15:41Speaker 1: well through slavery reparations, which is now happening for the
- 15:45Speaker 1: very first time. This new legislation HR forty was first
- 15:52Speaker 1: introduced thirty years ago and went nowhere thirty years ago,
- 15:55Speaker 1: and every year you had a socialist who continued to
- 15:59Speaker 1: try to put this legislation forward, and every year for
- 16:03Speaker 1: the last thirty years, as legislation went nowhere because liberals
- 16:09Speaker 1: realized it was ridiculous. We're no longer dealing with liberals.
- 16:15Speaker 1: New legislation to create a commission to study slavery reparations
- 16:19Speaker 1: for Black Americans has now been voted on and cleared
- 16:22Speaker 1: a House committee Wednesday in a historic vote. A historic
- 16:25Speaker 1: vote that had never happened the last thirty years. It
- 16:29Speaker 1: is now making its way the Full House for the
- 16:31Speaker 1: first time in more than three decades after it was
- 16:34Speaker 1: initially introduced. Because we are no longer dealing with liberals
- 16:38Speaker 1: than Democrats were dealing with socialists and communists, this legislation
- 16:42Speaker 1: would bankrupt America. The House Judiciary Committee found twenty five
- 16:47Speaker 1: socialists or communists to advance this bill over seventeen people
- 16:51Speaker 1: that said no. The bill will establish a thirteen person
- 16:56Speaker 1: commission to say the lasting impacts of slavery and ongoing
- 16:59Speaker 1: racial discrimination throughout the country's history. The panel then says
- 17:03Speaker 1: they will submit their findings a Congress and recommend remedies
- 17:08Speaker 1: necessary remedies, including compensation to Black Americans. The legislation, or
- 17:13Speaker 1: the Commission of Studying Developed Reparation Proposals for African Americans Act,
- 17:18Speaker 1: is sponsored by Representative Sheila Jackson Lee. She's a socialist.
- 17:22Speaker 1: In a statement, Jackson Lee said the vote in the
- 17:24Speaker 1: Industry Committee was long overdue for more than three decades
- 17:28Speaker 1: before her. Representative Kanyer, is a Democrat from Michigan, a socialist,
- 17:34Speaker 1: introduced it year after year without success. Why because liberals
- 17:38Speaker 1: understood this would totally undo the United States of America financially.
- 17:43Speaker 1: It would ruin US. Sheila Jackson Lee as one socialist
- 17:49Speaker 1: committed to another socialist, said she and that Kanyers entrusted
- 17:53Speaker 1: her with continuing the legislation when he retired. She said,
- 17:58Speaker 1: I took the challenge seriously, and here we are today
- 18:00Speaker 1: making up for the marking it up for the first
- 18:02Speaker 1: time the history of America, any legislation that deals directly
- 18:05Speaker 1: with the years and centuries of slavery of Americans and
- 18:08Speaker 1: African American people who are now the descendants of those Africans.
- 18:14Speaker 1: She says, because of the death of George Foyd, Beyonna Taylor,
- 18:17Speaker 1: and other Black Americans, including the recent death of Dante Wright,
- 18:21Speaker 1: now is the time to act about racially inequality and
- 18:24Speaker 1: the public consciousness and renewed debate on how to remedy
- 18:27Speaker 1: America's history of racism towards African Americans, including payments of reparations.
- 18:34Speaker 1: Representative Dean, a Democrat Socialists from Pennsylvania, the vice chair
- 18:38Speaker 1: of the House Judiciary Committee, said to the USA today
- 18:41Speaker 1: she hoped there would be openness to have real discussions
- 18:44Speaker 1: on the issue and asks hasn't the last year educated
- 18:47Speaker 1: us us or re educated us about injustices, the historical injustices,
- 18:53Speaker 1: reparations or compensation for historical crimes and wrongdoings which no
- 18:57Speaker 1: one alive today was a part of. They say, will
- 19:01Speaker 1: aim to remedy the injustices and help specific groups of
- 19:05Speaker 1: people or populations to prosper and bankrupt the country in
- 19:09Speaker 1: the process. How much money are we talking about here?
- 19:13Speaker 1: You want to know why this thing didn't go anywhere
- 19:15Speaker 1: when there was just liberals in charge. According to estimates
- 19:19Speaker 1: from an economist at Duke University who research is devoted
- 19:22Speaker 1: to inequality in the context of race, and also Kirsten Molin,
- 19:28Speaker 1: a historian, the cost of compensating American descendants from slaves
- 19:33Speaker 1: for the legacy of bondage and subsequent racial oppression, they
- 19:37Speaker 1: believe will reach twelve trillion dollars at least. This isn't liberalism,
- 19:44Speaker 1: This is communism, This is socialism. That the reason why
- 19:47Speaker 1: they do this is the same reason I go back
- 19:49Speaker 1: to the other story that Minnesota mayor who now has
- 19:54Speaker 1: seized power and control of the police department, who suggests
- 19:57Speaker 1: that officers don't need to be armed, who has seized
- 20:00Speaker 1: control of an entire city with emergency powers and gotten
- 20:04Speaker 1: rid of the police chief. So now he is the
- 20:06Speaker 1: police chief as a mayor of a town, then he
- 20:08Speaker 1: knows nothing about policing. This is exactly the same power
- 20:14Speaker 1: grab that we're now seeing from the socialists or moving
- 20:17Speaker 1: this legislation forward, This would bankrupt America and they know it.
- 20:21Speaker 1: It would also redistribute wealth they believe from the evil
- 20:24Speaker 1: people that they hate, right the people that have money,
- 20:28Speaker 1: the white people, anyone that's not a minority or what
- 20:32Speaker 1: they believe is a minority, and it will take that
- 20:36Speaker 1: money from them. It will bankrupt the country. We will
- 20:38Speaker 1: lose the financial markets. We will have skyrocketing inflation. Inflation,
- 20:43Speaker 1: we have the skyrocketing price of goods and services. It
- 20:46Speaker 1: will crush small business owners, which they believe are somehow evil,
- 20:50Speaker 1: even though they didn't own any slaves. And then they
- 20:55Speaker 1: will take this money give it to people that will
- 20:58Speaker 1: then support them while consolidating power over a new country
- 21:03Speaker 1: which has no power in the world standing because we
- 21:06Speaker 1: are bankrupt. This is how socialists and communists gain power
- 21:12Speaker 1: and control. You cannot have a prospering nation and keep
- 21:17Speaker 1: socialism or communism alive. I will ask this question to
- 21:22Speaker 1: all of you listening right now. Name one successful country
- 21:27Speaker 1: that has continued to grow and prosper and the people
- 21:32Speaker 1: have continued to grow and prosper under communism or socialism.
- 21:38Speaker 1: It doesn't exist. It's never existed, it's never been successful.
- 21:44Speaker 1: We've tried it. There's history books about it. There's countries
- 21:48Speaker 1: who tried it multiple times, and every time they fail.
- 21:51Speaker 1: There are countries that go hardcore socialists or hardcore communists
- 21:55Speaker 1: and it totally fails. And finally the people rise up
- 21:58Speaker 1: and then they say, okay, we'll give you freedom, and
- 21:59Speaker 1: democrats see and they get that democracy, and then the
- 22:02Speaker 1: socialists and communists who haven't died out figure out a
- 22:05Speaker 1: way to get back socialism and communism, and we see
- 22:08Speaker 1: the cycle over and over again. We'll see countries they
- 22:09Speaker 1: get to vote and then they lose the right to vote,
- 22:11Speaker 1: and you see dictators and you see communists, and we
- 22:13Speaker 1: see socialists takeover. And every time, what do we have,
- 22:17Speaker 1: death and destruction of the people of that country. One
- 22:24Speaker 1: other thing, one other example, real quick, I want to
- 22:28Speaker 1: have for you last example of how we're not dealing
- 22:31Speaker 1: with a liberal party anymore is the pulling out of
- 22:35Speaker 1: all troops in Afghanistan and the reason behind it. The
- 22:39Speaker 1: reason behind it is is because they don't believe that
- 22:41Speaker 1: Al Qaeda and ISIS are a threat to this country.
- 22:45Speaker 1: They don't even care about them anymore. In fact, they
- 22:48Speaker 1: think the threat to this country is in this country
- 22:51Speaker 1: domestic terrorism. On ABC's The View, this is a quote
- 22:57Speaker 1: normal conversation on public broadcasting on ABC that aired today
- 23:04Speaker 1: Joey be Harbor and Whoopie Goldberg and the other women
- 23:07Speaker 1: of the View, which is now considered whether you and
- 23:10Speaker 1: I agree with it or not, a mainstream TV show,
- 23:13Speaker 1: said that GOP leaders need to start concentrating on domestic
- 23:17Speaker 1: terrorists and not Afghanistan, saying we've got our own problems
- 23:20Speaker 1: in this country. In other words, you're the problem, you
- 23:22Speaker 1: white domestic terrorists. Yesterday, President Biden said that after twenty
- 23:28Speaker 1: years and more than twenty three hundred American lives lost,
- 23:32Speaker 1: it is time to call our troops home from Afghanistan,
- 23:35Speaker 1: and it's a move that's being met with very strong
- 23:39Speaker 1: reaction from both sides of the Aisle. Take a look.
- 23:41Speaker 1: We cannot continue the cycle of extending or expanding our
- 23:46Speaker 1: military presidence in Afghanistan, hoping to create ideal conditions for
- 23:51Speaker 1: the withdrawal and expecting a different result. I've concluded that
- 23:55Speaker 1: it's time to end America's longest war. It's time for
- 23:59Speaker 1: America troops to come home. I beg you, President Biden,
- 24:03Speaker 1: reevaluate this. Don't lock yourself in because things are going
- 24:07Speaker 1: to change quickly in Afghanistan for the worst. I think
- 24:10Speaker 1: the President is right a wolf. I think twenty years
- 24:14Speaker 1: of war, the longest war in the history of this
- 24:17Speaker 1: country in Afghanistan, is enough. Bernie Sanders declared socialists is
- 24:22Speaker 1: the guy that the left goes to to back up
- 24:24Speaker 1: Joe Biden, the newest member of the Socialist Democratic Party. Now,
- 24:30Speaker 1: the women of the View went on to say, we
- 24:32Speaker 1: have our own problems to deal with in this country
- 24:36Speaker 1: that have to do with terrorism, domestic terrorism. In fact,
- 24:38Speaker 1: they even called out who they believe the domestic terrorists are.
- 24:41Speaker 1: They believe that the domestic terrorists in this country are
- 24:44Speaker 1: their new war right, because you go to war within
- 24:46Speaker 1: your own country to consolidate power. They said, it's the
- 24:49Speaker 1: white people. It's the most pressing issue that the FBI
- 24:54Speaker 1: has right now in this country. Sunny Hosting, a hardcore racist,
- 25:00Speaker 1: said on the View today, I am concerned about domestic
- 25:03Speaker 1: terrorists and white supremacist in US. I'm not concerned about Afghanistan.
- 25:08Speaker 1: I'm not concerned about ISIS or account and they're not
- 25:10Speaker 1: even concerned about another nine eleven because these socialists are
- 25:14Speaker 1: at war with freedom in this country. They're at war
- 25:17Speaker 1: with people they hate in this country, white people. This
- 25:22Speaker 1: is all from today. Police shouldn't have guns, Mayor's taking over,
- 25:30Speaker 1: using emergency powers to take over police departments, packing of
- 25:34Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. See can do whatever you want to.
- 25:38Speaker 1: Bankrupting this country through slavery reparations twelve trillion dollars, first
- 25:42Speaker 1: time it's ever moved forward in thirty years of trying.
- 25:48Speaker 1: And oh, let's get out of Afghanistan and focus on
- 25:50Speaker 1: the real terrorists, the white supremacists in the US. This
- 25:53Speaker 1: isn't one day wake up America. They're at war with us,
- 26:01Speaker 1: whether we are willing to admit it or not. These
- 26:04Speaker 1: socialists are not compassionate. Lennon, by the way, once said
- 26:07Speaker 1: you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.
- 26:11Speaker 1: The broken eggs were people, and over one hundred million
- 26:14Speaker 1: people around the world have been burned by socialist regimes
- 26:17Speaker 1: that praise Marxists and socialists and communists. Socialism is not compassionate.
- 26:24Speaker 1: Socialism is a violent takeover of this country, and they're
- 26:28Speaker 1: doing it right now. All right. Quick reminder, please share
- 26:35Speaker 1: this podcast with your family and friends. We've been banned
- 26:38Speaker 1: from Facebook, so we need you to share it. Screenshot
- 26:41Speaker 1: this podcast, share it with your family and friends, and
- 26:44Speaker 1: make sure other people see it. Thank you, guys. See tomorrow.