Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Bombshell: Did Merrick Garland Commit Perjury & Obstruction of Justice?

Transcript

Bombshell: Did Merrick Garland Commit Perjury & Obstruction of Justice? · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Center has always nice to be with you here in person.
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: And if the White House thought the Hunter Biden plea
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: Dale was going to get them a get out of
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: jail free card, clearly they are wrong. As more whistleblowers
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: are coming forward and more damning information that's now making
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: it to the podium at the White House, and they're
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: having a hard time just walking all this back.
• 0:20
  Speaker 2: Now.
• 0:21
  Speaker 3: Well, the White House and the Department of Justice are
• 0:24
  Speaker 3: in one mode right now, and that is stonewall. They
• 0:27
  Speaker 3: are desperately trying to cover everything up that they are
• 0:30
  Speaker 3: simply running away, and it is bad. The evidence is
• 0:34
  Speaker 3: mounting and mounting and mounting, and they don't have a
• 0:38
  Speaker 3: substantive response. They're not addressing it on the merits. Instead,
• 0:42
  Speaker 3: what they're hoping is that their lap dogs in the
• 0:45
  Speaker 3: media will continue to hide it for them. It is
• 0:48
  Speaker 3: getting so bad even the corrupt corporate media can't ignore
• 0:52
  Speaker 3: this anymore. But here, take a look at the Attorney
• 0:55
  Speaker 3: General of the United States and what he's saying.
• 0:57
  Speaker 2: I certainly understand that some have chosen to attack the
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: integrity of the Justice Department as components and its employees
• 1:06
  Speaker 2: by claiming that we do not treat like cases alike.
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: This constitutes an attack on an institution that is essential
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: to American democracy and essential to the safety of the
• 1:17
  Speaker 2: American people. Nothing could be further from the truth. You've
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: all heard me say many times that we make our
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: cases based on the facts and the law. These are
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: not just words. These are what we live by. They
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: are the foundation of the way we make these decisions.
• 1:34
  Speaker 2: The agents of the FBI, as well as the DA,
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: the ATF our Deputy US Marshals, every day, often at
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: great personal risk, protect the American people and secure its safety.
• 1:48
  Speaker 2: Our cases are based on their work. I could not
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: be more proud to.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: Work with them. Senat you predicted this. You said they
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: were going to indict Hunter Biden, and then they're going
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: to say, see, look at how fair we are as
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: we go after Donald Trump, and we have no bias
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: the agency. That's clearly though not the case.
• 2:06
  Speaker 3: Well, let me be clear, as I listen to that
• 2:07
  Speaker 3: press conference, it's infuriating Merrick Garland says, you're impugning the
• 2:14
  Speaker 3: integrity of the Department of Justice. Now, let me be
• 2:16
  Speaker 3: very clear, it's your integrity. It's Merrick Garland's integrity that
• 2:21
  Speaker 3: is missing. He is the one who has politicized this process,
• 2:25
  Speaker 3: and he is the one who is burning the integrity
• 2:28
  Speaker 3: of the Department of Justice to the ground. And by
• 2:30
  Speaker 3: the way, the people accusing him are his own damn employees.
• 2:34
  Speaker 3: The whistleblowers work for him, and they're coming forward mad saying,
• 2:40
  Speaker 3: why is this man turning the Department of Justice into
• 2:43
  Speaker 3: a political arm for the DNC that self righteous? If
• 2:51
  Speaker 3: you dare question me, you are disloyal. I'd look at that.
• 2:58
  Speaker 3: And I see Louis the fourteen, the son king. LETASSEMOI
• 3:04
  Speaker 3: I am the state, I am justice. He tells you
• 3:09
  Speaker 3: the words he saying are objectively false. We use the
• 3:11
  Speaker 3: same standards for everyone, whether your name is Trump or Biden. Well, okay,
• 3:15
  Speaker 3: if your name is Biden, you can have classified documents everywhere.
• 3:18
  Speaker 3: You can stick him next to your corvette, No big deal,
• 3:20
  Speaker 3: We don't care. But if you're Trump, we're setting in
• 3:22
  Speaker 3: the stormtroopers. By the way, they do the same thing
• 3:26
  Speaker 3: as we discussed at length on Verdict. If you're violating
• 3:29
  Speaker 3: the law committing federal crimes outside the homes of Supreme
• 3:31
  Speaker 3: Court Justice, we don't like. We don't enforce the law.
• 3:34
  Speaker 3: Why because we agree with the violent protesters and we
• 3:37
  Speaker 3: don't like the justices, so our politics are on this side.
• 3:39
  Speaker 3: On the other hand, if you're a pro life protester,
• 3:43
  Speaker 3: my goodness, you are the greatest terrorist threat to humanity
• 3:46
  Speaker 3: and we are going to send the storm troopers at
• 3:49
  Speaker 3: your house like they did with Markalk at the break
• 3:51
  Speaker 3: of dawn, with machine guns drawn. Every word he said
• 3:56
  Speaker 3: there is a lie and the self righteousness with which
• 3:59
  Speaker 3: he says it. Man, I gotta say it's time. It
• 4:06
  Speaker 3: is time the Department of Justice needs to appoint a
• 4:12
  Speaker 3: special council to investigate Merrick Garland for obstruction of justice
• 4:19
  Speaker 3: and perjury. Wow, there's a reason he's saying, don't ask
• 4:25
  Speaker 3: these questions. Let's be clear. It is his integrity and
• 4:28
  Speaker 3: I want to walk through it because that is a
• 4:30
  Speaker 3: very serious statement. But at this point, the evidence that
• 4:34
  Speaker 3: Merrick Garland personally committed multiple felonies is growing greater and greater,
• 4:41
  Speaker 3: and the chances that the Merrick Garland Justice Department will
• 4:46
  Speaker 3: fairly investigate evidence of his wrongdoing are zero. So let's
• 4:50
  Speaker 3: walk through it. On perjury. Let's remember the start of
• 4:58
  Speaker 3: the irs whistleblower. It concerned an allegation that Merrick Garland
• 5:04
  Speaker 3: himself had committed perjury. So Gary Shapley, the first IRS
• 5:11
  Speaker 3: whistleblower who wrote to Congress. I want to read from
• 5:14
  Speaker 3: his prepared statement in Congress. Beginning in January twenty twenty,
• 5:19
  Speaker 3: I was assigned to work the Hunter Biden investigation as
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: a supervisory special agent for IRS criminal investigation US Department
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: of Treasury. So this is not some Republican, This is
• 5:30
  Speaker 3: not some partisan. This is a career supervisory special agent
• 5:36
  Speaker 3: for the IRS criminal investigations. What did he do? He
• 5:39
  Speaker 3: supervised line agents investigating Hunter Biden until I continued in
• 5:46
  Speaker 3: that role until I was removed from the investigation by
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: the US Department of Justice. That's Merrick Garland in May
• 5:57
  Speaker 3: of twenty twenty three. So just two months ago, after
• 6:01
  Speaker 3: providing protected disclosures concerning prosecutors mishandling of the investigation of
• 6:07
  Speaker 3: Hunter Biden, to include conflicts of interest, preferential treatment, deviations
• 6:12
  Speaker 3: from normal investigated procedures, and conflicting information provided by Attorney
• 6:18
  Speaker 3: General Merrick Garland to Congress. Now understand what he's saying.
• 6:21
  Speaker 3: He came forward as a whistleblower to say Merrick Garland
• 6:25
  Speaker 3: just committed perjury, lied under oath to the United States
• 6:28
  Speaker 3: Congress in response, what did Merrick Garland do had him
• 6:32
  Speaker 3: removed from the case immediately retaliated, which is in and
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: of itself illegal and part of what the Special Council
• 6:38
  Speaker 3: needs to investigate. Now, this whistleblower continues. Most recently, former
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: Attorney General Bill Barr provided an interview in which he
• 6:51
  Speaker 3: stated that the information provided by a confidential human source
• 6:55
  Speaker 3: concerning an alleged illegal bribery scheme by President Joe Biden
• 7:01
  Speaker 3: was received through the Pittsburgh US Attorney's Office and was
• 7:05
  Speaker 3: determined it was not likely to have been disinformation. This
• 7:12
  Speaker 3: is a big deal that they made a determination. Okay,
• 7:16
  Speaker 3: this is not likely Russian disinformation or something else. In
• 7:20
  Speaker 3: other words, there could easily be some there there. According
• 7:24
  Speaker 3: to Attorney General Bar, it was provided to the ongoing
• 7:29
  Speaker 3: investigation in Delaware to follow up on and to check out. Now,
• 7:34
  Speaker 3: he continues, neither I, nor the line IRS criminal Investigation
• 7:40
  Speaker 3: agents operating under my supervision, nor the FBI agents working
• 7:44
  Speaker 3: with IRSCI wherever provided the confidential human source information the
• 7:49
  Speaker 3: Attorney General Bar recently referenced was sent to Delaware to
• 7:54
  Speaker 3: have it checked out. He goes on to say the
• 7:56
  Speaker 3: confidential human source information was sealed by prosecutors, by people
• 8:03
  Speaker 3: working for Merrick Garland. They said, we don't want the
• 8:06
  Speaker 3: FBI agents to see this. We don't want the IRS
• 8:08
  Speaker 3: to see this. That on the face of it. By
• 8:11
  Speaker 3: the way, we also have a letter from quite recently
• 8:15
  Speaker 3: from June nineteenth, twenty twenty three. It's an interview of
• 8:20
  Speaker 3: whistleblower X. We don't know who whistleblower X is. That's
• 8:23
  Speaker 3: the anonymous pseudonym, but whistleblower X confirms in particular, as
• 8:31
  Speaker 3: mister X is testified he was the IRS Criminal Investigation's
• 8:37
  Speaker 3: case agent over the subject investigation at the time, in
• 8:41
  Speaker 3: other words, investigating Hunter Biden and mister X has stated
• 8:45
  Speaker 3: to me that he has never seen this FBI Form
• 8:50
  Speaker 3: ten twenty three and that he does not recall ever
• 8:53
  Speaker 3: hearing about this information being turned over in any meeting
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: with the prosecution team in Delaware. Further, mister X informed
• 9:01
  Speaker 3: me that this information could have been relevant to mister
• 9:04
  Speaker 3: X's investigation at the time of the subject as it
• 9:09
  Speaker 3: related to a claim of five million dollars being paid
• 9:14
  Speaker 3: to the subject, which directly ties to email correspondence reviewed
• 9:18
  Speaker 3: between Subject and a business partner of Subject set in
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: May of twenty fourteen, which is believed to reference the
• 9:26
  Speaker 3: five million dollars being paid to subject from Company XXX.
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: It's shocking when you put it all together the way
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: you're describing it what Merrick Garland has clearly I think
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: done or tried to accomplish by covering it up and
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: making this go away. And this on top of the
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: fact that this week we had other people that were
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: also saying, hey, there was this idea that then Delaware
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: the prosecutor had the ability to do whatever he needed
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: to do and to charge anybody with whatever he needed,
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: charge them wherever he needed to. Then there was word
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: that came out this week from others saying.
• 9:57
  Speaker 3: By the way, that we're not going to do that.
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: That's what Merrick Garland les lied about. Right, So Merrick
• 10:01
  Speaker 3: Garland told Congress actually in response to a question from yours,
• 10:05
  Speaker 3: truly it would be me that he lied to under
• 10:08
  Speaker 3: oath walk.
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: People down that road the question that you ask, so
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: people understand what you were trying to get to at
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: that point.
• 10:13
  Speaker 3: Well, here, I'll tell you what we'll do better than that,
• 10:15
  Speaker 3: We'll play it right now. Let me say, in particular
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: on Hunter Biden, I very much hope that an investigation
• 10:23
  Speaker 3: of Hunter Biden is focused not just on his own
• 10:25
  Speaker 3: personal substance of abuse issues, but on connections to his
• 10:30
  Speaker 3: father and potential corruption. That is the matter of public
• 10:34
  Speaker 3: concern and why people are concerned. And it was striking
• 10:37
  Speaker 3: that the leak that came out from DOJ suggested this
• 10:40
  Speaker 3: is just going after some poor, poor person struggling with
• 10:43
  Speaker 3: drugs instead of looking at the very real evidence of corruption.
• 10:48
  Speaker 3: Will you commit that the investigation will actually examine the
• 10:52
  Speaker 3: public corruption aspect and not simply scapegoat Hunter Biden as
• 10:57
  Speaker 3: an individual.
• 10:59
  Speaker 2: I can't about the investigation other than to say that
• 11:02
  Speaker 2: all the matters involving mister hunter Biden are a purview
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: of the US Attorney in Delaware. It's not restricted in
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: his investigation in any way.
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: So you look at that there when you were asking
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: that question, based on now we have, you're saying, it's
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: pretty fair to say he probably just find out lied
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: to you and to Congress under oath.
• 11:21
  Speaker 3: Well, that's what the whistleblower has alleged that he did
• 11:24
  Speaker 3: lie to me to Congress under oath, and to be
• 11:27
  Speaker 3: clear lying, he started that testimony by raising his right hand,
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: taking an oath tell the truth. The whole truth and
• 11:33
  Speaker 3: nothing but the truth. So help me God if that
• 11:37
  Speaker 3: statement you just saw was a lie. That the statement
• 11:39
  Speaker 3: that there's no political interference from DJ and the investigation
• 11:43
  Speaker 3: of Hunter Biden, that is a criminal offense with serious
• 11:47
  Speaker 3: jail time. It's yet another reason why I believe it
• 11:50
  Speaker 3: is time for a special counsel, And let's be clear,
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: a special counsel with real credibility, not a henchman of
• 11:56
  Speaker 3: Merrick Garland who's going to give him a sanitized report,
• 11:58
  Speaker 3: but someone who will laugh actually investigate, because at this
• 12:02
  Speaker 3: point it is the Attorney General directly who is implicated
• 12:06
  Speaker 3: in this and his conduct, his absolute hubris. How dare
• 12:14
  Speaker 3: you question me? And let me say something about the
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: Delaware US attorneys. So a lot of folks in the
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: corporate media keep saying, well to US attorney appointed by Donald.
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: Trump over and over again. They always lead with that.
• 12:27
  Speaker 3: Now that dramatically overstates the situation. I don't know mister Weiss.
• 12:33
  Speaker 3: I don't know anything about him, his background, he was
• 12:37
  Speaker 3: a career prosecutor. What I can tell you is how
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: US attorneys are picked, which is US attorneys are picked
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: essentially by the senators from that state. In other words,
• 12:48
  Speaker 3: The Delaware US Attorney was picked by Tom Carper and
• 12:52
  Speaker 3: by Chris Coons, both of whom are.
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: Democrats, pretty liberal Democrats.
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: And by the way, Delaware is also the home to
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: Joe Biden, who is the closest to a political king
• 13:06
  Speaker 3: in a tiny state of Delaware. Joe Biden is the
• 13:10
  Speaker 3: colossus that bestrides tiny little Delaware. You know, my mom
• 13:16
  Speaker 3: was born in Delaware, in Wilmington, Delaware. Her mother was
• 13:19
  Speaker 3: the second youngest of seventeen kids. Wow, they were Irish Catholic,
• 13:24
  Speaker 3: you know, because I liked to joke, they didn't know
• 13:25
  Speaker 3: what else to do it. On a Saturday night when
• 13:29
  Speaker 3: I was first sworn into the Senate thirteen, Joe Biden
• 13:34
  Speaker 3: swore me in. He was the vice president at the time,
• 13:37
  Speaker 3: and I introduced my mom to him, and my mom
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: told him said, oh, I have hundreds of cousins in Delaware,
• 13:45
  Speaker 3: and Biden smiled and said, oh, they probably all voted
• 13:48
  Speaker 3: for me. And it was actually it was charming the
• 13:51
  Speaker 3: way he did it. It was and my mom laughed and
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: she sort of rolled her eyes and said, yeah, they
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: probably did. The point is this US Attorney was handpicked
• 14:01
  Speaker 3: by two Democrat senators, so every time the reporters say
• 14:04
  Speaker 3: a Donald Trump US attorney. The way it works, you
• 14:07
  Speaker 3: can't advance it without the senator signing off, and so.
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: So okay, to be clear, a lot of people to
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: understand this is inner workings. I love doing the show
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: for this reason. Any state in America, you've got an
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: attorney you're gonna pick. If the two senators say no
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: to that, it's dead, it's dead in the water.
• 14:22
  Speaker 3: Yep.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: Okay, yep. A lot of people have none none. So
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: Trump said, this is probably the best I can get
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: out of Delaware from two Democrats.
• 14:30
  Speaker 3: So look, there's nothing in his background that indicates that
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: the guy is a wild eyed leftist. Sure, but he's
• 14:38
  Speaker 3: not remotely a Republican either. He's someone who had been
• 14:40
  Speaker 3: a career prosecutor in a state like Delaware. People know him.
• 14:44
  Speaker 3: I am certain he's a Democrat. That you know that
• 14:47
  Speaker 3: in that process. Look, there are four US attorneys in Texas.
• 14:50
  Speaker 3: I can tell you the US attorneys for eleven years.
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: John Cornyn and I have been integral in selecting each
• 14:56
  Speaker 3: and every one of them and giving those names to
• 15:00
  Speaker 3: the White House. And that's true whether it's Republican or Democrat.
• 15:02
  Speaker 3: That's true for Trump US attorneys, it's true for Biden
• 15:05
  Speaker 3: US attorneys.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: Now, is it a short list you guys give them
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: or is it like basically saying, hey, this is who
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: we want. Here's a name, we think they're qualified. You
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: guys need to let this happen.
• 15:17
  Speaker 3: So it varies, and different senators have more leverage than others.
• 15:22
  Speaker 3: Typically with Corner and I, we give them one name. Okay,
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: we had the house one name and say this is
• 15:28
  Speaker 3: who you're going to be. Now, look, they're different names
• 15:33
  Speaker 3: under Trump. Corner and I forwarded very different names than
• 15:36
  Speaker 3: we do under Biden. Sure, Look under Trump, there were
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: some strong conservative US attorneys that Trump was happy to appoint,
• 15:45
  Speaker 3: and we had really strong leadership for Texas US attorneys.
• 15:50
  Speaker 3: We're not going to point a vocal, strong Republican conservative
• 15:56
  Speaker 3: as a US attorney nominee for the Biden White House.
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: That's they're not going to give a hard core democrat.
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: Those are dead in the water. Like if you're a
• 16:03
  Speaker 3: hard partisan Democrat, you're you're not getting it. That's the
• 16:07
  Speaker 3: way the process worked. If Corner and I don't sign off,
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: that US attorney doesn't go forward. So we have an
• 16:13
  Speaker 3: absolute veto on that. The same is true for Tom
• 16:16
  Speaker 3: Carper and Chris Coons, which means they both affirmatively signed
• 16:20
  Speaker 3: off and said, this is our guy.
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: He's watered down enough, he's enough of a Democrat. That's
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: on our team. We're good with it.
• 16:29
  Speaker 3: I'm not saying that to impugne his integrity, but I
• 16:32
  Speaker 3: am saying the repeated refrain that he's a Trump guy.
• 16:36
  Speaker 3: There's nothing in Donald Trump, and there's nothing in his
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: background to think that he has even one iota of fondness, loyalty.
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: There's nothing, there's ever a voted by Donald Trump that
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: happened to be the president who appointed him. But for
• 16:53
  Speaker 3: US attorneys, far more relevant as who are the senators.
• 16:58
  Speaker 3: What Garland told the Senate Judiciary Committee, what I asked
• 17:03
  Speaker 3: him is he said, I the son King, the Attorney
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: General will not interfere with this prosecution. What we're saying
• 17:14
  Speaker 3: coming out of the House is a mountain of evidence
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: that that's not the case.
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: Let me tell you real quick though, first, before we
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: get to another question about these whistleblowers about Augusta precious medals,
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: if you've seen what's been going on the economy, if
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: you've been looking at your IRA your four to one
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: k and you've got losses. The majority of people do.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: Especially with what's been going on with the economy. You've
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: seen interest rates that have more than doubled on houses,
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: and interestates have gone up in general. That has been
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: tough for a lot of people in retirement or close
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: to retirement. If you want to protect some of your
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: hard earned dollars your assets, call Augusta Precious Medals. Now
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: they are different because they actually sit down with you
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: one on one in a web conference and talk to
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: you about your financial situation, what you've saved, your retirement diversification,
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: and they want to help you protect your dollars because look,
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: if you're in retirement a close retirement, there is no
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: time to make up losses. And that's where gold can
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: come in to help you protect your dollars. Check them
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: out eight seven seven the number four GOLDRA eight seven
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: seven the number four Gold IRA. You can also go
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: online to Agusta Precious Metals dot com. That's Augusta Precious
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: Metals dot com and they will send you your free
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: investors guide on gold eight seven seven the number four
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: Gold IRA. Get that peace of mind back and make
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: sure you have diversification when you're heading into retirement eight
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: seven seven, the number four gold Ira Sata. I want
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: to ask you one other question about these whistleblowers are
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: coming forward. I think it needs to be stated just
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: how brave they are. Yes, they're risking their careers. I
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: think many of them know that regardless of what the
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: whistle blower rules say they're supposed to be under this administration,
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: there's a very good chance their careers are completely going
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: to be stonewalled, done, put into isolation, taken off the
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: cases which in their JOPP which has already happened. They're
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: risking at all to come forward to you, guys.
• 19:07
  Speaker 3: They are and we've seen and in fact, the House
• 19:10
  Speaker 3: has put FBI whistleblowers forward who have had their whole
• 19:13
  Speaker 3: careers destroyed. That these guys, Merrick Garland and the Biden
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: Justice Department have behaved like vicious partisans. If you cross them,
• 19:23
  Speaker 3: they will crush you. They will destroy your career, they
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: will destroy your livelihood. They've done it over and over again.
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: And I want to walk through some of the specific
• 19:30
  Speaker 3: allegations these whistleblowers are put forward because they're incredibly damning.
• 19:35
  Speaker 3: Number One, they have alleged the Justice Department not once,
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: but twice prevented US Attorney David Weiss from bringing stronger
• 19:43
  Speaker 3: charges against Hunter Biden. Now, let's be clear if that
• 19:47
  Speaker 3: is correct, Merrick Garland committed perjury twice. Wow, so that's
• 19:51
  Speaker 3: what they've alleged. The Justice Department prevented the US Attorney
• 19:55
  Speaker 3: from bringing stronger charges twice against Hunter Biden. That is
• 20:00
  Speaker 3: directly contrary to what Merrick Garland testified under Oath number two.
• 20:04
  Speaker 3: Merrick Garland refused to name a special council in the
• 20:07
  Speaker 3: tax investigation. Number three, the IRS recommended charges against Hunter
• 20:15
  Speaker 3: Biden that were not approved by Merrick Garland. So it
• 20:19
  Speaker 3: wasn't just the US Attorney's office in Delaware saying we
• 20:22
  Speaker 3: want to bring stronger charges. It was the IRS saying
• 20:25
  Speaker 3: we want to bring stronger charges. And again, Merrick Garland,
• 20:28
  Speaker 3: the Department of Justice said no, you can't. Number four.
• 20:34
  Speaker 3: Then this is a really damning one. The investigation fore
• 20:37
  Speaker 3: warned Hunter Biden of future searches for materials that could
• 20:42
  Speaker 3: be used as evidence. So understand this. They're executing search warrants,
• 20:48
  Speaker 3: they're looking for evidence of a crime, and yet this
• 20:50
  Speaker 3: administration gave a heads up to Hunter. Hey, here's where
• 20:54
  Speaker 3: we're going to go search before it happened. By the way,
• 20:58
  Speaker 3: that's called obstruction of justice. That's why I believe Merrick
• 21:00
  Speaker 3: Garland needs to be investigated for obstruction of justice because
• 21:04
  Speaker 3: you don't have the investigators tell the subject to the investigation.
• 21:07
  Speaker 3: Here's where we're searching for evidence. Hint, hint. If you
• 21:10
  Speaker 3: have any evidence there, make sure to remove it. Number five,
• 21:15
  Speaker 3: an assistant Attorney General named Leslie Wolf refused to allow
• 21:19
  Speaker 3: the investigators to ask about Joe Biden being quote the
• 21:24
  Speaker 3: big guy. This assistant US attorney needs to testify under oath.
• 21:30
  Speaker 3: If it is correct that this assistant in the US
• 21:32
  Speaker 3: attorney told investigators you are not allowed to ask about
• 21:37
  Speaker 3: Joe Biden being the big guy, well, then that is
• 21:43
  Speaker 3: directly contrary to what Merrick Garland testified under oath to Congress.
• 21:49
  Speaker 3: This same assistant US attorney, according to the whistleblowers, told
• 21:54
  Speaker 3: the investigation team, they could not search Joe Biden's guesthouse
• 21:59
  Speaker 3: in Delaware, which is where Hunter Biden was living, because
• 22:03
  Speaker 3: of quote optics. So at this point they're just looking
• 22:08
  Speaker 3: for well, this would look bad politically for the president,
• 22:10
  Speaker 3: so never mind we're not really investigating crimes, we're not
• 22:13
  Speaker 3: following the law. We're making sure we don't do anything
• 22:16
  Speaker 3: that has bad optics for the president. Another individual, Rob Walker,
• 22:21
  Speaker 3: who is a Biden family associate, said Joe Biden showed
• 22:25
  Speaker 3: up at a meeting with cef C, which is a
• 22:28
  Speaker 3: Chinese energy company closely affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party,
• 22:35
  Speaker 3: that Biden showed up personally there. They also said that
• 22:44
  Speaker 3: Hunter Biden demanded in twenty seventeen to be paid by
• 22:50
  Speaker 3: Chinese businessman Henry Zoo while Joe Biden was sitting next
• 22:56
  Speaker 3: to him in a room. And hold on to that one,
• 22:59
  Speaker 3: and we'll come back to that one in a minute.
• 23:02
  Speaker 3: They also revealed that Hunter Biden, on his tax returned
• 23:06
  Speaker 3: deducted payments to prostitutes as employees and to sex clubs.
• 23:14
  Speaker 3: He claimed claimed those were business deductions. They also revealed
• 23:18
  Speaker 3: that the investigation of Hunter Biden began as an offshoot
• 23:23
  Speaker 3: into an inquiry into a foreign adult platform. So listen,
• 23:26
  Speaker 3: there's lots of sordid stuff here, but what is really
• 23:31
  Speaker 3: sorted is corruption by the president of the United States.
• 23:34
  Speaker 3: And so I want to go back to the to
• 23:37
  Speaker 3: the WhatsApp that was sent and this.
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: Is big breaking news this week for people that may
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: be miss a verdict. We talked about this. Go back
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: and listen, but I want to be able to understand
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: this what's app text. We have a copy of it.
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: It is Hunter Biden basically shaking down someone demanding it
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: and using his father saying he's sitting right.
• 23:58
  Speaker 3: Next to me. We're gonna put it up on this
• 24:00
  Speaker 3: you can see it on the screen. This is if
• 24:05
  Speaker 3: you didn't listen to Friday's pod, you should go back
• 24:07
  Speaker 3: and listen to Friday's pod because it is all about
• 24:10
  Speaker 3: this smoking gun evidence. This WhatsApp sent by Hunter Biden
• 24:16
  Speaker 3: to Henry Zoo says as follows. I'm sitting here with
• 24:19
  Speaker 3: my father and we would like to understand why the
• 24:22
  Speaker 3: commitment made has not been fulfilled. Tell the director that
• 24:26
  Speaker 3: I would like to resolve this now before it gets
• 24:28
  Speaker 3: out of hand, and now means tonight, and z if
• 24:33
  Speaker 3: I get a call or text from anyone involved in
• 24:37
  Speaker 3: this other than you, Zang or the chairman, I will
• 24:41
  Speaker 3: make certain that between the man sitting next to me,
• 24:44
  Speaker 3: in other words, Joe Biden and every person he knows,
• 24:50
  Speaker 3: and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you
• 24:53
  Speaker 3: will regret not following my direction. I am sitting here
• 24:57
  Speaker 3: waiting for the call with my father.
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: The King, Ben, the big guy.
• 25:04
  Speaker 3: This is as damning evidence of presidential corruption we've ever seen,
• 25:12
  Speaker 3: and it's worth remembering what Joe Biden said. Here's what
• 25:19
  Speaker 3: Joe Biden told the American people about whether he discussed
• 25:22
  Speaker 3: business dealings with his son or was involved in business
• 25:25
  Speaker 3: dealings with his son. Oh, I have never discussed with
• 25:28
  Speaker 3: my son, or my brother or anyone else ending him
• 25:33
  Speaker 3: to do with their businesses.
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: Period. That was a lie.
• 25:36
  Speaker 3: If this WhatsApp is accurate, if this is a real document,
• 25:40
  Speaker 3: and if Hunter Biden was telling the truth, then Joe
• 25:44
  Speaker 3: Biden flat out lied, just like Merrick Garland is accused
• 25:47
  Speaker 3: of perjury. Joe Biden. That wasn't under oath, So that's
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: not a felony. That was just a lie to the
• 25:52
  Speaker 3: American people on national television during a presidential campaign. But
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: if this WhatsApp is jen when, then Joe Biden lied
• 26:02
  Speaker 3: to the American people. And let me go back to
• 26:04
  Speaker 3: the whistleblowers because we need to tie these together. The
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: investigators wanted to obtain location information to confirm that Joe
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: Biden was in the room with Hunter. So Hunter says,
• 26:20
  Speaker 3: I'm sitting next to my father. The investigator said, hey,
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: we can figure that out. Where was Joe Biden at
• 26:25
  Speaker 3: the time. We know when the webs app was sent,
• 26:27
  Speaker 3: we know where Hunter was, where was Joe And at
• 26:32
  Speaker 3: this point it's not clear that the investigators were allowed
• 26:36
  Speaker 3: to do that. It appears that they may have been
• 26:40
  Speaker 3: prevented from checking Joe Biden's location data. All of this
• 26:46
  Speaker 3: piled together, and by the way, that list comes from
• 26:48
  Speaker 3: a very good article that Breitbart put together of thirteen
• 26:52
  Speaker 3: ways that this administration stonewalled and blocked investigation based on
• 27:00
  Speaker 3: the whistleblowers and the point I make. Look, I don't
• 27:05
  Speaker 3: lightly call for a special counsel to investigate the Attorney
• 27:08
  Speaker 3: General of the United States for obstruction of justice and
• 27:10
  Speaker 3: for perjury.
• 27:11
  Speaker 1: Have you ever called for that to happen against an AG?
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: No?
• 27:14
  Speaker 3: Yeah, And given this at this point, the evidence is overwhelming.
• 27:20
  Speaker 3: And you know Merrick Garland, if he were standing up
• 27:24
  Speaker 3: saying these are very serious allegations. We need to come
• 27:27
  Speaker 3: clean with the American people. We need to disclose what happened.
• 27:30
  Speaker 3: We need each of the individuals who have testified to
• 27:32
  Speaker 3: tell the American people.
• 27:33
  Speaker 1: What happened.
• 27:34
  Speaker 3: We need to clear the air. We need to have
• 27:36
  Speaker 3: absolute confidence in the Department of Justice. If he was
• 27:39
  Speaker 3: saying that, that'd be a very different story. But he's not.
• 27:42
  Speaker 3: He is defiantly saying you can't touch me.
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: Yeah it is well, also saying that my employees are amazing.
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: Yet it's his own employees that are whistleblowing on his abusive.
• 27:54
  Speaker 3: Power because he is so damaging the Department of Justice
• 27:58
  Speaker 3: and so damaging the air FBI that his own employees
• 28:01
  Speaker 3: are outraged. And look what it is doing to the
• 28:05
  Speaker 3: White House. This is a White House press briefing that's
• 28:07
  Speaker 3: really astonishing.
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: Watch this.
• 28:10
  Speaker 4: The House Ways and Means Committee yesterday released documents their
• 28:14
  Speaker 4: Authenticity Nowhere Challenge that included a July twenty seventeen WhatsApp
• 28:19
  Speaker 4: message sent by Hunter Biden to Henry Jao.
• 28:24
  Speaker 3: Here pausters, I guess Communist Party official. So I want
• 28:28
  Speaker 3: to point out two things right now. Number one, James
• 28:31
  Speaker 3: Rosen is asking a great question. Terrific journalist, one of
• 28:34
  Speaker 3: the few journalists still doing journalism today. He points out
• 28:38
  Speaker 3: the WhatsApp content, it's authenticity nowhere challenged. Listen to that
• 28:44
  Speaker 3: very carefully because you're going to see. John Kirby doesn't
• 28:46
  Speaker 3: challenge it either. Nobody has challenged it could be a
• 28:49
  Speaker 3: defense to say this is pride, this doesn't exist. That
• 28:54
  Speaker 3: if it's fraudulent, that would be a real defense. But
• 28:56
  Speaker 3: Rosen said, look, no, one's doubting this thing's real. That
• 28:59
  Speaker 3: Hunter said exactly this, by the way, exactly the same
• 29:02
  Speaker 3: as the Hunter Biden laptop. At no point did Hunter
• 29:05
  Speaker 3: Biden say no, no, no, it's not real. And look at Actually,
• 29:11
  Speaker 3: I want to rewind and play from the beginning. This
• 29:13
  Speaker 3: is right at the beginning of this clip. I want
• 29:14
  Speaker 3: to rewind and play from the beginning. Look at John
• 29:17
  Speaker 3: Kirby's face when Rosen brings this up, because Kirby looks
• 29:23
  Speaker 3: to the side, like, get me that hell out of here,
• 29:27
  Speaker 3: the look of terror.
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: And he's looking at the White House pre secretary and
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: her staff.
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Karine, Jean Pierre.
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: I don't want a part of this. You guys, ndle
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: this here. It is. It's amazing.
• 29:36
  Speaker 4: The House Ways and Means Committee yesterday released documents their
• 29:40
  Speaker 4: authenticity nowhere challenged. That included a July twenty seventeen WhatsApp
• 29:46
  Speaker 4: message sent by Hunter Biden to Henry Jao, a Chinese
• 29:51
  Speaker 4: Communist Party official, which stated in its entirety and I quote,
• 29:57
  Speaker 4: I am sitting here with my father, and we would
• 30:00
  Speaker 4: I like to understand why the commitment made has not
• 30:01
  Speaker 4: been fulfilled. Tell the director that I would like to
• 30:04
  Speaker 4: read resolve this now before it gets out of hand,
• 30:07
  Speaker 4: and now means tonight and zee. If I get a
• 30:09
  Speaker 4: call or text from anyone involved in this other than
• 30:11
  Speaker 4: you Xang or the chairman, I will make certain that
• 30:14
  Speaker 4: between the man sitting next to me and every person
• 30:17
  Speaker 4: he knows, and my ability to forever hold a grudge,
• 30:20
  Speaker 4: that you will regret not following my direction. I am
• 30:24
  Speaker 4: sitting here waiting for the call with my father unquote.
• 30:27
  Speaker 4: So just a couple of questions about this. First, does
• 30:31
  Speaker 4: this not undermine the president's claim during the twenty twenty
• 30:35
  Speaker 4: campaign and the reaffirmations of that claim by his two
• 30:39
  Speaker 4: pres secretary since then, that he never once discussed his
• 30:42
  Speaker 4: son's overseas business dealings with him.
• 30:44
  Speaker 5: No, and I'm not going to comment further on this, James, James,
• 30:49
  Speaker 5: let me just let me save you some let me say,
• 30:52
  Speaker 5: let me say, let me save you some breath. If
• 30:54
  Speaker 5: you're gonna ask about this I am not addressed. I
• 30:58
  Speaker 5: know you do more than i'd like you to have.
• 31:00
  Speaker 5: I am not going to address this issue from this podium.
• 31:03
  Speaker 5: I'm just not going to do it.
• 31:04
  Speaker 3: I'm not going to do the president.
• 31:07
  Speaker 5: Thank you, Thanks guys, have a great weekend in the
• 31:10
  Speaker 5: father's house.
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: I mean, you can even see the White House Press
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: series Luke when she walks like I'm walking into this.
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: Now your hand, that's over to me.
• 31:16
  Speaker 3: So I gotta say, when Kirby leaves the podium, I'm
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: reminded of the great scene in Monty Python run away
• 31:23
  Speaker 3: right away. Let me ask one question in response to Kirby,
• 31:29
  Speaker 3: which actually the reporters were calling out, Why the hell not?
• 31:32
  Speaker 3: He says, I'm not going to answer it. Why not? Yeah,
• 31:34
  Speaker 3: because it's hard. Oh, you only answer the easy ones.
• 31:38
  Speaker 3: I'm not gonna answer. We have evidence. And by the way,
• 31:41
  Speaker 3: this was just put out by the Chairman of the
• 31:42
  Speaker 3: Ways and Means Committee of the US House of Representative.
• 31:45
  Speaker 3: This is not some random guy on Twitter. Yeah that
• 31:50
  Speaker 3: it is the son of the President of the United
• 31:54
  Speaker 3: States shaking down a Communist Party official for millions of dollars,
• 31:57
  Speaker 3: invoking his father, saying his father's sit right next to
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: him and saying, Daddy is gonna punish you if you
• 32:04
  Speaker 3: don't give me the money, And the White House's response
• 32:07
  Speaker 3: is I'm not gonna answer it. Why because I don't
• 32:09
  Speaker 3: want to answer from this podium.
• 32:10
  Speaker 1: My question is there another podium they will answer this question.
• 32:13
  Speaker 3: It just I don't want to answer. I don't want
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: to answer. I mean it, what the hell are you
• 32:18
  Speaker 3: talking about? There is serious evidence of corruption from the president.
• 32:24
  Speaker 3: You are giving a press briefing at the White House.
• 32:27
  Speaker 3: You're not asking about some random thing. And his answer
• 32:30
  Speaker 3: is just because I don't want to. And in fact,
• 32:32
  Speaker 3: there's one exchange where Rosen says I have a lot more.
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: He's like, I know you do a lot more than
• 32:36
  Speaker 3: I wish you did.
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: Did.
• 32:37
  Speaker 3: Yeah, dude, I'm sorry that the administration that you were
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: willing to be a part of there's mounting evidence of
• 32:49
  Speaker 3: corruption coming out and the administration is stone walling at
• 32:52
  Speaker 3: every step. But when you play bag dad Bob and
• 32:56
  Speaker 3: say no, I'm not gonna answer, not gonn answer, not
• 32:57
  Speaker 3: gonna answer, there's no basis for not answering. They're not
• 33:01
  Speaker 3: asking you can I have the nuclear codes that you
• 33:03
  Speaker 3: could say, I'm not going to answer the national security reason,
• 33:05
  Speaker 3: I'm not going to tell you the nuclear codes.
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: Well, it used to be an ongoing investigation with Hunter,
• 33:09
  Speaker 1: so we're not going to talk about it. Then it
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: was a personal, private, family matter, so we're not going
• 33:13
  Speaker 1: to talk about it. There's one part of this that
• 33:16
  Speaker 1: you could argue you should absolutely have to answer the question.
• 33:19
  Speaker 1: This is a Chinese This has kind of an overlooked
• 33:21
  Speaker 1: but it's it's clear.
• 33:23
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and he's an admiral, right, Kirby is an admiral
• 33:25
  Speaker 3: who spent most of his career speaking on behalf of
• 33:28
  Speaker 3: the Department of Defense.
• 33:30
  Speaker 1: But go ahead, No, you have a Chinese Communist Party
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: official who's being shaken down by Hunter Biden and his
• 33:37
  Speaker 1: father is sitting next to him. So the idea that
• 33:39
  Speaker 1: this could be private or a personal matter, or doesn't
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: involve the government, or doesn't involve the White House all
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: should be taken off the table. This is an official
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: member of the Chinese Communist Party, an official party official.
• 33:52
  Speaker 3: And Hunter is threatening official retribution from the US government. Yes, so, now,
• 33:58
  Speaker 3: to be fair at the fair At the time I'm
• 34:00
  Speaker 3: of the WhatsApp, Joe Biden had just finished being Vice president,
• 34:04
  Speaker 3: so he was not currently an office holder. He was
• 34:07
  Speaker 3: simply the immediate past vice president and fixing to be
• 34:11
  Speaker 3: in a few years the next president. So he had
• 34:14
  Speaker 3: a lot of levers to pull, but he did not
• 34:16
  Speaker 3: at that instant have official government powered exercise.
• 34:19
  Speaker 1: So then this goes back the question when this deal
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: that was done, when this arrangement between this Chinese Communist
• 34:27
  Speaker 1: Party official happened, was he then the vice president? Do
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: we know that timeline? Because the question that should be
• 34:33
  Speaker 1: answered by the White House.
• 34:36
  Speaker 3: If the whistleblowers are accurate, then the investigators were not
• 34:39
  Speaker 3: allowed to ask because they weren't allowed to investigate the
• 34:42
  Speaker 3: big guy. This is all about We've got our scapegoat.
• 34:45
  Speaker 3: Our scapegoat is hunter. He's a poor, troubled substance abuse user,
• 34:53
  Speaker 3: and blame it all on him, but nothing about the
• 34:57
  Speaker 3: big guy. Protect the big guy, Protect Joe Biden at
• 35:00
  Speaker 3: all costs. And I got to say, you know what
• 35:03
  Speaker 3: Merrick Garland said in that press conference, it actually is accurate.
• 35:08
  Speaker 3: The Department of Justice has a long tradition of integrity,
• 35:11
  Speaker 3: and integrity is important to the rule of law in America.
• 35:15
  Speaker 3: I want the Department of Justice to be above reproach.
• 35:18
  Speaker 3: I want the FBI to be above reproaches. Why I'm
• 35:21
  Speaker 3: so angry because Merrick Garland knows better. When he lays
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: down at night, there is a little still voice in
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: the back of his head that he knows he is
• 35:32
  Speaker 3: lighting on fire. An institution that has protected the rule
• 35:36
  Speaker 3: of law, has protected the Constitution, has protected our rights
• 35:42
  Speaker 3: for decades, and he's doing so. I don't know why
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: he's doing it.
• 35:49
  Speaker 1: Is a direction from the President of United States of America,
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: Or is this he just got so far off the
• 35:55
  Speaker 1: beaten path of what legally he was supposed to do
• 35:58
  Speaker 1: in his job that now he doesn't know how to
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: come back, or is it could be a combination of both.
• 36:03
  Speaker 3: Look, I genuinely don't know, and I don't want to
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: play armchair psychologists, although we're sitting in armchairs. Some have
• 36:14
  Speaker 3: speculated that and when he didn't get the Supreme Court
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: and when the Senate didn't take it up, that it
• 36:19
  Speaker 3: just infuriated it. Maybe that list, Maybe that's it. I
• 36:24
  Speaker 3: don't know. To be honest, I don't know the man.
• 36:27
  Speaker 3: I have never met Merrick Gardli. I've shaking his hand,
• 36:30
  Speaker 3: I think once or twice in a hearing room, But
• 36:33
  Speaker 3: I don't know him when he was up for Attorney general,
• 36:37
  Speaker 3: he refused to come by the office to meet. It
• 36:39
  Speaker 3: was COVID, and so he was he was like, no, no, no,
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: because of COVID, I can't ask hard questions. By the way,
• 36:45
  Speaker 3: no other attorney general has done that. And the Department
• 36:47
  Speaker 3: of Justice nominees did that over and over and over again.
• 36:49
  Speaker 3: They used COVID for the bidens, wasn't it if you
• 36:53
  Speaker 3: want to hide in the basement, COVID was a fabulous excuse.
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: So I'm sitting here. He he behaves as if he
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: is utterly unaccountable to anyone. And to be honest, that's
• 37:07
  Speaker 3: the same way the White House is behaving, John Kirby.
• 37:12
  Speaker 3: They're what possible basis. It's not a basis at a
• 37:15
  Speaker 3: press conference to say I'm not going to answer your
• 37:18
  Speaker 3: question because the answer would make me look really bad.
• 37:21
  Speaker 3: I don't want to because it's bad for the president.
• 37:23
  Speaker 3: And so no, thank you, Like that's what he said. Yeah,
• 37:28
  Speaker 3: not here are the facts. Not these are serious allegations,
• 37:32
  Speaker 3: not the WhatsApps falls, not not anything. It's just I'm
• 37:38
  Speaker 3: not going to tell you now that's from this podium,
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: from this.
• 37:43
  Speaker 1: Podium or the other podium yeah, I'm just I want
• 37:45
  Speaker 1: to find the other podium where he would ever answer
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: this question. I don't think it'll ever happen. And that's
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: where you have to those questions answer. My question for
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: you is this what moves and what happens next when
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: it comes to Congress dealing with him? If more comes
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: out that the line, and before you answer that, I
• 38:02
  Speaker 1: want to tell you about our friends at Patriot Mobile.
• 38:04
  Speaker 1: If you are sick and tired of giving your money
• 38:07
  Speaker 1: to woke companies and you want to give your money
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: to companies that actually align with your values, one great
• 38:13
  Speaker 1: way to do it is with your cell phone. Now,
• 38:15
  Speaker 1: you may not realize the Big Mobile has been giving
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: money for years. We're talking about millions and millions of
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: dollars to hardcore leftist organizations and include Planned Parenthood. That's
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: where Patriot Mobile comes in. Not only the only conservative
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: Christian conservative phone coming in the US, but they give
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: you amazing coverage. You can keep your same cell phone number,
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: you can keep your same cell phone you have right now,
• 38:37
  Speaker 1: or upgrade to a new one. And when you pay
• 38:39
  Speaker 1: your bill every month, a percentage of that bill goes
• 38:42
  Speaker 1: back to support the causes that you want to stand
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: with we're talking about the First and Second Amendment rights.
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: We're talking about standing up for unborn children, helping with adoptions,
• 38:51
  Speaker 1: and standing with our veterans and our first responders and
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: our police. Check out Patriot Mobile. Give your money to
• 38:57
  Speaker 1: a company that is aligned with what you believe inven
• 39:01
  Speaker 1: eight seven eight Patriots. The number that's eight seven eight Patriot,
• 39:04
  Speaker 1: that's age seven to eight Patriot or Patriot mobile dot com,
• 39:09
  Speaker 1: slash verdict Patriot mobile dot com slash verdict Center. Moving
• 39:14
  Speaker 1: forward with Garland, Clearly the pew that work for him
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: have had enough of him. They think he's lied. They're
• 39:20
  Speaker 1: coming forward and whistleblowing on him and talking about how
• 39:23
  Speaker 1: they're not allowed to do their jobs, which for them,
• 39:26
  Speaker 1: I think is absolutely nonpartisan. They just want to do
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: their job and do it. The lost says that's why
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: they're coming for it. It's not a Republican that says
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: I'm a Republican to hear me out. These are people
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: that just want to do their job and go where
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: the evidence would allow him to go. And he's throwing
• 39:41
  Speaker 1: a wall and saying you can't go there, and they
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: go this way and they go you can't go there,
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: it's amaze that never ends. So if this keeps mounting
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: against him, where does this move with Congress next?
• 39:51
  Speaker 3: Look, it's going to continue to be the House of
• 39:53
  Speaker 3: Representatives that drives this. We've now got multiple committees that
• 39:57
  Speaker 3: are investigating. We've got the Ways It Means Committee, We've
• 40:00
  Speaker 3: got the Oversight Committee where the Judiciary Committee, they're going
• 40:03
  Speaker 3: after and investigating, and they need to keep driving this
• 40:05
  Speaker 3: because the Senate doesn't care. I'm going to press the
• 40:09
  Speaker 3: Senate Judiciary Committee to do something on it, and that
• 40:11
  Speaker 3: will not succeed because Dick Durbin doesn't care. There is
• 40:15
  Speaker 3: not a single Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committe who
• 40:17
  Speaker 3: gives a flip. They haven't asked a question about it. WhatsApp.
• 40:22
  Speaker 3: I promise you you're going to see me in the
• 40:24
  Speaker 3: Senate Judiciary Committee with the poster board of this WhatsApp
• 40:27
  Speaker 3: behind me, and I'm going to ask the Democrats about it,
• 40:29
  Speaker 3: and they're not going to respond. Their response is going
• 40:32
  Speaker 3: to be John Kirby's I'm not going to answer that,
• 40:34
  Speaker 3: but it's actually going to be better than John Kirby.
• 40:35
  Speaker 3: They're simply sin since they're not actually at a podium
• 40:38
  Speaker 3: at a press conference. They'll just ignore it. They'll just
• 40:40
  Speaker 3: be like, oh look, look squirrel. Yeah, they'll they'll just
• 40:44
  Speaker 3: talk about something totally different. They are willing. It doesn't
• 40:49
  Speaker 3: matter what evidence there is about Joe Biden, they don't
• 40:53
  Speaker 3: want to talk about it. An interesting question is does
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: there come a point where the corporate media has to
• 40:59
  Speaker 3: out I will tell you, for a long time, Hunter
• 41:03
  Speaker 3: Biden laptop, all this stuff the corporate media ignored. I
• 41:07
  Speaker 3: will say as I was flying back to Texas, the
• 41:13
  Speaker 3: I think it was NBC News was on the TV
• 41:16
  Speaker 3: and the airport and they were suddenly covering on the
• 41:20
  Speaker 3: six o'clock news whistleblowers with allegations of misconduct at the
• 41:26
  Speaker 3: Department of Justice. And it was the first time I
• 41:29
  Speaker 3: had seen the corporate media start to cover this. If
• 41:33
  Speaker 3: that starts to happen more, that's a big deal. If
• 41:36
  Speaker 3: you look at Watergate, if you look at when Richard
• 41:39
  Speaker 3: Nixon started to go down, they're different pieces. One of
• 41:43
  Speaker 3: the pieces has to be a Democrat flipping with Nick.
• 41:47
  Speaker 3: Yet that hadn't happened yet, and we're nowhere close. With Nixon,
• 41:50
  Speaker 3: lots of Republicans flipped, which ultimately took him down. But
• 41:54
  Speaker 3: the corporate media has to decide to do their job
• 41:56
  Speaker 3: and actually cover these facts. Right now, what they do
• 42:00
  Speaker 3: almost every waking moment is scream Trump Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump,
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: Trump Trump. They don't want to talk about this. This
• 42:06
  Speaker 3: is getting so bad. Uh that may change.
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: I want to tell you about our friends of her Chalk.
• 42:13
  Speaker 1: If you're a guy and you feel like you got
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: a little bit older, you feel like fatigue is setting in.
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: Maybe you just feel like you don't have that strength
• 42:19
  Speaker 1: and vitality that you used to. I want to tell
• 42:21
  Speaker 1: you about Chalk. Go to choq dot com and they
• 42:25
  Speaker 1: at Chalk can help you boost your testos from up
• 42:28
  Speaker 1: to twenty percent and ninety days now. I've been taking
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: the Mail Vitality Stack hitting forty. Things are just different now.
• 42:35
  Speaker 1: You get that, you get that fatigue that sits in,
• 42:38
  Speaker 1: You get that brain fog that sits in. It's frustrating
• 42:40
  Speaker 1: and you're like, wait, I don't like this. That's where
• 42:43
  Speaker 1: Chalk comes in and can help you. So go to
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: choq dot com and check out the Mail Vitality Stack.
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: They can help boost your testos from up to twenty
• 42:52
  Speaker 1: percent over ninety days plus if you use the promo code.
• 42:56
  Speaker 1: Ben you'll get thirty five percent off any chalk subscription
• 43:00
  Speaker 1: for life. Just use a promo code ben choq dot com.
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: Promo code ben if your guy fight back against the
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: War on fatigue and check out chalk choque dot com.
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: Don't forget to hit that subscribe auto download button, or
• 43:16
  Speaker 1: if you're listening on Apple, the follow button and you
• 43:19
  Speaker 1: can get this show three days a week. If you're
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: watching this video as well, and you don't listen to
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: the podcasts on your phone, just put it. If you
• 43:26
  Speaker 1: have an iPhone, put in the word pod in your
• 43:28
  Speaker 1: search and you'll see podcasts come up. You can hit
• 43:30
  Speaker 1: that follow button on Verdict and you can get every
• 43:34
  Speaker 1: episode for free, so make sure you do that right
• 43:36
  Speaker 1: a five star review. We'll see you back here in
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: just a couple of days.