Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Radical Judges Lead new Lawfare Movement plus the Rise of Domestic Terror Threats

Transcript

Radical Judges Lead new Lawfare Movement plus the Rise of Domestic Terror Threats · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: In the last four months, the Trump administration has seen
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: more nationwide injunctions than the entirety of the twentieth century,
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: and more nationwide injunctions than President George W. Bush, Barack Obama,
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: and Joe Biden combined. The translation is pretty clear. This
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: is not normal. In fact, it's totally out of control,
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: radicalized justice at the hands of the left. And by
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: the way, it's not even justice, it is anarchy of
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: our judicial system. It's all being orchestrated in a campaign
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: of judicial obstruction and activism. As the chair of the
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight and Agency Action
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: as well as Federal Rights, Ted Cruz is leading the
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: way on the discussion on the ways to rein in
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: these abusive nationwide injunctions. Now, as many of you know,
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: I do a podcast with Senator Cruz. He had a
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: very intense and linked the conversation with Corey Booker. We
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: decided to do our show on that because this is
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: obviously a threat to our democracy. We see now and
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: I'm going to go and say it again. There have
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: been more nationwide injunctions in the last four months in
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: the entirety of the twentieth century and more nationwide injunctions
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: and President George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden combined,
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: this is a threat to our democracy. And the play
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: is very clear. What the Democrats are doing is they're
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: going to their friends who are liberal activist judges and
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: they're getting them to do their dirty work for them.
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: That's number one. But number two, they're also doing this
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: because it's the only way they believe they can fight
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: back against Donald Trump effectively, because because they lost the
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: last election and the fact that the Republicans controlled the House,
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: the Senate, and the presidency, this is their option to
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: go rogue and to be radical. I want you to
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: hear the conversation centered cruise that I had and also
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: this very intense back and forth on the issue with
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Corey Booker. Now to put it in perspective for you,
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: Corey Booker is trying to figure out how to become
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: the president of the United States America. He certainly wants
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: to make sure he's the nominee for the Democratic Party,
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: and he's having to do this by actually outgoing to
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: the left or outliberaling radical communists and socialists like AOC.
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: And so this is part of the reason why he's
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: in essence endorsing this behavior by these activist judges. Now
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: we also know what's happened at the Supreme Court because
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: of Democrats. They've been leaking opinions, for example the Roe v. Wade,
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: which was un precedented in that decision. And the Democrats
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: have no problem intimidating justices, including those in the Supreme Court.
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: They've been trying to undermine the legitimacy of the Supreme
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: Court anytime they get a ruling they don't like. And
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: they have no problem with the Court justices, especially those
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: that are conservatives, having threats against themselves and their families.
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: But first I want to tell you about my friends
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: at Patriot Mobile. If you've got a cell phone and
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: your cell phone is not with Patriot Mobile, then the
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: question I gotta ask you is why why have you
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: not made the switch? Well, you should make the switch,
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: and the deal is really easy. You get cutting edge technology.
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: Switching has never been easier. There's no store visits, no hassles.
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: You get to keep your same phone number you have
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: right now. You get to keep your same phone you've
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: got now or upgrade to a new one. And they
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: have a one hundred percent US based team that can
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: activate you literally in minutes. The other thing that I
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: love about Patriot Mobile is this they have access to
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: all three major networks, meaning you get exceptional nationwide coverage.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: I use Patriot Mobile and half for years. They can
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: even put a second number on a different network on
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: your phone. It's like carrying two phones in one. You
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: can have a work number and a personal number. It's amazing.
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: They have unlimited data plans, mobile hotspots, international roaming, Internet
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: on the go devices, and home internet backup as well.
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: You can get all of this from Patriot Mobile. So
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: why are you waiting? Make the switch today? And by
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: the way, when you pay your bill, you know that
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: about five percent of that bill every month is going
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: back to support conservative causes. Causes that stand for our
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: First and or Second Amendment rights, the rights of unborn children,
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: and they stand with our veterans, our first responders or
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: police and firemen, are EMTs and are wounded warriors. So
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: make a difference with every call you make. So right now,
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: go to Patriotmobile dot com, slash ferguson or call them
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: ninety seven to two Patriot You're going to get a
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: free month of service with the promo code Ferguson. So
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: switch to Patriot Mobile and make a difference with every
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: call you make Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson or
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: nine seven to two Patriot. All right, now, take a
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: listen to this conversation that I had with Senator Cruz
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: and his back and forth in Congress with Corey Booker. Senator,
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: We've got two big topics to discuss today, including something
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: in the Senate that got a little spicy between you
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: and Cory Booker.
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: Well, it did so. Yesterday I chared a hearing that
• 5:44
  Speaker 2: was examining the abuse of power from individual district court
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: judges who are issuing nationwide injunctions against President Trump and
• 5:55
  Speaker 2: the Trump administration. And this is the latest iteration of
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: law fair. This is in the last four years, we
• 6:03
  Speaker 2: saw Democrat prosecutors indict Donald Trump four separate times. That
• 6:08
  Speaker 2: that was they were doing everything they could to stop
• 6:11
  Speaker 2: the voters from re electing President Trump.
• 6:14
  Speaker 3: That failed.
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: Now during the Trump presidency, we are seeing law fair unfold.
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: We are seeing Democrat attorneys general filing lawsuits every single day.
• 6:26
  Speaker 2: We are seeing left wing activist groups filing lawsuits every day,
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: and they are seeking out radical left wing judges who've
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: been appointed in very blue districts. And what we have
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: seen is we have seen over forty nationwide injunctions against
• 6:47
  Speaker 2: the Trump administration. Now, to give you a sense of
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: just how egregious this is, in the first one hundred
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: and fifty years of our nation's history, Ben, do you
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: know how many nationwide injunctions were issued.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: I have no idea, but I'm guessing comparing it to forty,
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: it's not going to be a lot.
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: The number would be zero. So the first one hundred
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: and fifty years of our nation's history, there was not
• 7:11
  Speaker 2: a single nationwide injunction that was issued. Now, how about
• 7:15
  Speaker 2: the twentieth century, the twentieth century, the entire hundred years
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: from nineteen hundred to nineteen ninety nine, there have been
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: more nationwide injunctions issued against the Trump administration in the
• 7:30
  Speaker 2: first five months than there were in the entire twentieth century.
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: There have also been more nationwide injunctions issued against Trump
• 7:41
  Speaker 2: than there have been during the George W. Bush presidency,
• 7:46
  Speaker 2: plus the Barack Obama presidency, plus the Joe Biden presidency
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: all combined. This is an assault. You have left wing judges,
• 7:57
  Speaker 2: individual radical district judge who are issuing injunctions, trying to
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: set aside the policies of the president, and trying to
• 8:07
  Speaker 2: set aside the will of the American voters. And it
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: is an assault in democracy. And I got to say
• 8:14
  Speaker 2: Democrats not only are okay with it, they're enthusiastically cheering
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: it on.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: It really is shocking, and the level of I think
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: attack is obviously, as you mentioned, very clear. It is
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: these judges are saying, we're going to take away the
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: power of the presidency. The dangerous aspect of that precedent
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: is also something that I would hope that many people
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: that maybe conserd themselves to be moderate or liberal would
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: be concerned about, because that's not how this country is
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: supposed to work now.
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: It should not be an individual district judge having the
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: ability to set aside the policies of the United States government,
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: the president of the United States, and the policies that
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: the voters voted on. Look, I think the single biggest
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: issue in this last election was the voters were sick
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: and tired of the open borders we saw for four
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: years the invasion of twelve million illegal immigrants, and they
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: wanted a president to secure the border and to deport murderers, rapists,
• 9:22
  Speaker 2: child molesters, violent Venezuelan gang members. That's what Donald Trump
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: is doing. And we're seeing the Democrats who are suing
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: over and over again, and they're getting radical left wing
• 9:35
  Speaker 2: judges to issue orders saying stop deporting criminals. And it's lawless.
• 9:40
  Speaker 2: By the way, federal immigration law gives enormous power to
• 9:43
  Speaker 2: the president to deport illegal immigrants, and these radical judges,
• 9:48
  Speaker 2: they don't care. And I will tell you as we
• 9:50
  Speaker 2: were discussing this in this hearing, so the Democrats all
• 9:54
  Speaker 2: showed up for this hearing and they were loaded for bear,
• 9:57
  Speaker 2: and they were all attacking President Trump. That was no surprise.
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: And they were saying that the President is horribly saying mean,
• 10:06
  Speaker 2: mean things about judges. And mind you, these are judges
• 10:12
  Speaker 2: who are dramatically abusing their power. And yet the Democrats
• 10:16
  Speaker 2: were all pretending to be horrified that the President would
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: criticize judges. Now, I want to play for you in exchange.
• 10:25
  Speaker 2: I had I was talking about the hypocrisy of Democrats
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: who are claiming to be defending judges. And yet when
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: Joe Biden was president and you had violent mobs protesting
• 10:39
  Speaker 2: outside the homes of Supreme Court justices. The Democrats said
• 10:43
  Speaker 2: not a word. They were not bothered at all that
• 10:47
  Speaker 2: the Biden Justice Department refused to enforce the criminal law
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: that makes it a crime to protest and outside the
• 10:55
  Speaker 2: home of a justice and to threaten the justice's families
• 10:59
  Speaker 2: as they were. And there was an exchange. So Corey Booker,
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: he's a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee. Corey wants to
• 11:06
  Speaker 2: run for president. He wants to run as the great
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: Liberal hope. And Corey decided to engage with me and
• 11:13
  Speaker 2: attack me on this issue. And he and I went
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: back and forth, and I want to play this entire exchange.
• 11:18
  Speaker 2: It's a little bit extended, but this exchange was striking
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: because he jumped in and he's like, no, no, no,
• 11:25
  Speaker 2: I'm going to fight you on this point. And I've
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: got to say, I don't want to be a spoiler here,
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: but I don't think it went well for Corey. Give
• 11:34
  Speaker 2: a listen, it did not.
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: Here. It is.
• 11:38
  Speaker 3: Indulge me for a moment, We indulge you every moment.
• 11:41
  Speaker 3: I appreciate that active generosity. It's just something you said
• 11:45
  Speaker 3: that I think is actually dangerous and should be addressed
• 11:49
  Speaker 3: and you're welcome. But when Judge Anderol was killed in
• 11:53
  Speaker 3: New Jersey, the Republican colleagues in the Senate, they're outpouring
• 11:57
  Speaker 3: of support, they're outpouring of concern, They're willing to work
• 12:01
  Speaker 3: together on a bipartisan bill. Was extraordinary. It shows the
• 12:04
  Speaker 3: truth of this institution that despite some of the fiery
• 12:08
  Speaker 3: rhetoric that you were selling, we're really by parties working
• 12:11
  Speaker 3: by partisanship. Cornin and Coombs, after the incidents you're talking about,
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: got together and actually passed a bill to better protect
• 12:21
  Speaker 3: our Supreme Court justices, many of whom are friends of ours.
• 12:26
  Speaker 3: You know, Gorsich and I disagree on a lot of stuff.
• 12:29
  Speaker 3: I knew his wife before he did. We studied together
• 12:31
  Speaker 3: at Oxford. This implication that there was silence when there
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: were threats on their people's houses is absolutely absurd. I
• 12:39
  Speaker 3: remember the rhetoric and the comments, the concern from Coons.
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: I actually distinctly remember you Chairman on more than once
• 12:46
  Speaker 3: condemning those attacks on Republican appointed jurists. To say things
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: like that feeds just the partisanship in this institution and
• 12:57
  Speaker 3: feeds the fiery rhetoric, and it's just plain not true.
• 13:01
  Speaker 3: It's just plain not true, and I think you know that.
• 13:04
  Speaker 3: But we can pull from the record for my colleagues
• 13:07
  Speaker 3: in real time, literally days afterwards condemning it. There's a
• 13:11
  Speaker 3: lot of substantive things to say here, but to think
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: that the lack of humanity when people's homes are being
• 13:17
  Speaker 3: threatened was not in existence, I think that's unfair and
• 13:20
  Speaker 3: really concerns me that you would say that in the
• 13:22
  Speaker 3: way that you did.
• 13:23
  Speaker 2: Well. I thank my colleague from New Jersey. I will note,
• 13:28
  Speaker 2: as John Adams observed, that facts are stubborn things, and
• 13:32
  Speaker 2: it is existing federal law eighteen USC. Section fifteen oh
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: seven that makes it a crime to protest at a
• 13:39
  Speaker 2: judge's home. And the law provides whoever, with the intent
• 13:42
  Speaker 2: of interfering, with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice,
• 13:46
  Speaker 2: or with the intent or of influencing any judge, dur
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: or witness, or court officer in the discharge of his duty,
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: pickets or parades interor near a building housing a court
• 13:55
  Speaker 2: of the United States internear a building or residence occupied
• 13:58
  Speaker 2: or used by such judge, juror witness, or court officer,
• 14:03
  Speaker 2: or with such intent, uses any sound, truck or similar
• 14:05
  Speaker 2: device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near
• 14:08
  Speaker 2: any such building or residence shall be fined under this title,
• 14:15
  Speaker 2: or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. That
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: is federal criminal law. Night after night after night, angry
• 14:24
  Speaker 2: mobs were outside the Supreme Court justices homes, and in
• 14:28
  Speaker 2: the entire course of it, the Biden Justice Department prosecuted nobody.
• 14:33
  Speaker 2: We had the Attorney General sitting at that table, and
• 14:37
  Speaker 2: multiple Republican senators asked him, why are you not enforcing
• 14:41
  Speaker 2: the law. What they are doing is a crime. And
• 14:44
  Speaker 2: my friend from New Jersey said, it is a lie
• 14:47
  Speaker 2: to say we the Democrats condone this. I would challenge
• 14:52
  Speaker 2: my friend find a single Democrat senator on this committee
• 14:57
  Speaker 2: holding the Attorney General to account for not enforcing this law.
• 15:01
  Speaker 2: I was here at those hearings, and I do not
• 15:03
  Speaker 2: recall a single Democrat senator saying to the Attorney General,
• 15:08
  Speaker 2: you should arrest these people who are violating the law.
• 15:11
  Speaker 2: You should protect the judges. I agree that there was
• 15:14
  Speaker 2: general language against violence, but not a single Democrat senator
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: that I ever saw in this committee was willing to
• 15:24
  Speaker 2: hold Attorney General Merrick Garland to account for flagrantly disregarding
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: the federal criminal law because the Biden administration agreed with
• 15:32
  Speaker 2: the protesters and I think wanted those justices harassed at
• 15:36
  Speaker 2: their home.
• 15:37
  Speaker 3: I really appreciate that you've now shifted the accusation you
• 15:39
  Speaker 3: made earlier. Your accusation was that we were silent in
• 15:43
  Speaker 3: the face of protests as Supreme Court justices homes. Again,
• 15:49
  Speaker 3: we joined together in a biparisan way, not only to
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: condemn that, but to pass legislation to extend round the
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: clock security protection literally as introduced May fifth past the
• 16:02
  Speaker 3: Senate bipartisan fashion on May night. So if you're saying
• 16:06
  Speaker 3: that we didn't criticize.
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: Them and arrest a single person on.
• 16:10
  Speaker 3: Who are now changing the that is what I say again.
• 16:13
  Speaker 2: I'll I'll pull the record itsrest even one again.
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: The answer is not my point to you. Who is
• 16:20
  Speaker 3: the accusation that the Democrats on this committee do not
• 16:25
  Speaker 3: care about the safety of federal judges. I did not
• 16:28
  Speaker 3: interrupt you, sir. I would appreciate if you let me finish.
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: I am sick and tired of hearing the kind of
• 16:37
  Speaker 3: heated partisan rhetoric, which is one of the reasons why
• 16:40
  Speaker 3: we have such divisions in this country. The attacks we
• 16:43
  Speaker 3: see from the President of the United States of America,
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: trolling and dragging judges through is to what we should
• 16:50
  Speaker 3: be talking about that puts people in danger. I'm simply
• 16:54
  Speaker 3: taking issue with the claim that you made at the
• 16:57
  Speaker 3: top that people on the Democratic side of the aisle
• 17:01
  Speaker 3: do not care about the safety and the security of
• 17:05
  Speaker 3: judges and said nothing. You said we were silent after
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: people's houses were protested. That is a patent lie, sir.
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: We were not silent. We took action. We've joined in
• 17:16
  Speaker 3: a bipartisan way to protect those judges, as was done
• 17:20
  Speaker 3: in a bipartisan way to protect a New Jersey judge
• 17:24
  Speaker 3: after their horrific attack at their home. So I see
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: you now trying to shift the debate to whether we
• 17:30
  Speaker 3: talk to an attorney general. I'm simply taking issue with
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: this accusation that somehow we Democrats are so bad because
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: we don't call out threats to college to our judicial colleagues,
• 17:43
  Speaker 3: and that is wrong. You could change the argument now
• 17:46
  Speaker 3: that you want, but what you said was patently not
• 17:48
  Speaker 3: true and was in fact a patent lie.
• 17:51
  Speaker 2: So I do enjoy the fact that my colleague from
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: New Jersey raises his voice and says it's a patent
• 17:57
  Speaker 2: lie and says he's doing so in defense of lowering
• 18:00
  Speaker 2: the rhetoric. There is some irony to doing those two together.
• 18:06
  Speaker 2: I'll point out that in the entire course of those remarks,
• 18:09
  Speaker 2: Senator Booker did not dispute the central point I made,
• 18:13
  Speaker 2: which is, the Biden Justice Department arrested zero people, prosecuted
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: zero people for violating the criminal law, and every Democrat
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: senator on this committee was silent about it. And this
• 18:25
  Speaker 2: was an ongoing pattern for months. And I would note
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: also that the Senator from New Jersey clutched his pearls
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: about language threatening judges, and yet I do not recall
• 18:36
  Speaker 2: a single Democrat senator of this committee saying a word
• 18:40
  Speaker 2: when Chuck Schumer went to the steps of the Supreme
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: Court and threatened the safety of the Supreme Court justices
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: by name Gorsich and Kavanaugh, and he said, you have
• 18:50
  Speaker 2: unleashed the whirlwind and you will pay the price. And
• 18:55
  Speaker 2: not a single Democrat senator had a word to say
• 18:57
  Speaker 2: about this, And so their outr is selective. And I
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: will give my colleague from New Jersey a chance to
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: just answer a simple yes, no question. Should the Biden
• 19:08
  Speaker 2: Justice Department have enforced the criminal law against protesting at
• 19:13
  Speaker 2: a justice's home, yes or no.
• 19:15
  Speaker 3: So the rank hypocrisy of Chuck Schumer apologizing the next
• 19:18
  Speaker 3: day and you holding that standard for him and not
• 19:21
  Speaker 3: for your president, who you actually rightfully describe when you
• 19:25
  Speaker 3: were running against him in a primary. I would love
• 19:28
  Speaker 3: to run those tapes of how you perfectly talked about
• 19:32
  Speaker 3: the danger of our president and his rhetoric. But now
• 19:36
  Speaker 3: you are failing, in fact blind to the very things
• 19:40
  Speaker 3: you're accusing Chuck Schumer of. I don't think Donald Trump
• 19:42
  Speaker 3: would know an apology if it hit him in the head,
• 19:45
  Speaker 3: never set apologizing. So again, you are very, very sir,
• 19:50
  Speaker 3: very very deep into the waters of hypocrisy in your
• 19:53
  Speaker 3: criticisms of Chuck Schumer.
• 19:56
  Speaker 2: So let the record reflect that Spartacus did not answer
• 19:59
  Speaker 2: the cou question and did not tell us whether the
• 20:02
  Speaker 2: criminal law should be enforced, because he knows the answer
• 20:05
  Speaker 2: is yes, and he knows that the Biden Department of
• 20:08
  Speaker 2: Justice was being wildly political and partisan in refusing to
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: enforce the law because they disagreed with the Supreme Court
• 20:15
  Speaker 2: justice's rulings.
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: That was one very entertaining back and forth. Centator I
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: wish there was actually more of this in the Senate
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: because it's a great moment where you can see two
• 20:27
  Speaker 1: very different viewpoints, two very different ways of looking at this.
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: And like you said, it did not go well for
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: Corey Booker, but I actually love that there's this type
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: of grand debate.
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: Absolutely, we need to have this engagement. We need to
• 20:42
  Speaker 2: have this engagement on ideas, and it's striking the Democrats.
• 20:48
  Speaker 2: They claim they support democracy, but yet when it comes
• 20:53
  Speaker 2: to Donald Trump, they want a single unelected district judge
• 20:59
  Speaker 2: striking down every policy he implements. And they don't care
• 21:03
  Speaker 2: that the American people voted for it. They want power.
• 21:08
  Speaker 2: And look, in the course of this hearing, there were
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: a couple of points I made that no Democrat had
• 21:13
  Speaker 2: a response to. Number one, these lawsuits are being filed
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: over and over again before radical left wing judges. Of
• 21:23
  Speaker 2: the forty plus nationwide injunctions that have been issued against
• 21:27
  Speaker 2: the Trump administration, thirty five of them have been in
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: five jurisdictions, five left wing jurisdictions. They're seeking out these
• 21:38
  Speaker 2: left wing judges because they know that they'll rule for them,
• 21:41
  Speaker 2: and the Democrat defense is, well, gosh, Trump is just
• 21:45
  Speaker 2: violating the law. Well, you know what, if that were true,
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: you'd be willing to file the cases anywhere. But you're not.
• 21:54
  Speaker 2: The Democrat attorneys general, the left wing interest groups are
• 21:57
  Speaker 2: going to seek out the radicals because they know the
• 22:00
  Speaker 2: radicals will rule for them. And we're not seeing Democrat
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: senators defend that position. We're not seeing them say, give
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: any explanation as to why one radical judge should be
• 22:15
  Speaker 2: able to set aside nationwide the policies of the President
• 22:19
  Speaker 2: of the United States, who was elected by the American
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: people to secure the borders, to bring us back to
• 22:25
  Speaker 2: common sense positions. And so I think this hearing was important,
• 22:29
  Speaker 2: and I got to say, I think Corey Booker. Listen,
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: Corey is running for president of the United States. That's not complicated.
• 22:37
  Speaker 2: He's going to run in twenty twenty eight, and he's
• 22:39
  Speaker 2: running in the left lane of the Democrat Party. So
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: he's going to take on Elizabeth Warren, he's going to
• 22:46
  Speaker 2: take on AOC and he's going to argue, I am
• 22:49
  Speaker 2: I am liberal Democrat here mirror. But at the end
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: of the day, trying to appeal to those radicals, you've
• 22:58
  Speaker 2: got a problem if you actually got to address the substance,
• 23:01
  Speaker 2: and I think today we did and it was not
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: the outcome he was hoping for.
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: It certainly was not. And it's one of those moments
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: that I'll be interested to see when this audio and
• 23:14
  Speaker 1: video comes back to haunt him down the road when
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: that president run you mentioned, because I think he thought
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: he was about to have a moment and it's not
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: the moment he probably was hoping for if you go
• 23:24
  Speaker 1: back and look at that tape. I want to also
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: get to this other big issue, and that is out
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: in Colorado and the tear attack there. We've got a
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: significant update on this individual and also real concerns and
• 23:38
  Speaker 1: honesty now coming from the administration about the real threat
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: of other terrorists that may be in this country that
• 23:45
  Speaker 1: were led into this country by the Biden and Harris administration.
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: Well, it turns out that four years of open borders
• 23:51
  Speaker 2: allowing over twelve million people to come into this country illegally,
• 23:56
  Speaker 2: that was a really bad policy. And even worse, Look,
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: there were ten million people who were apprehended by the
• 24:05
  Speaker 2: Biden administration.
• 24:06
  Speaker 3: They let them go.
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: That is problematic on many many fronts, but the most
• 24:11
  Speaker 2: disturbing number is two million. They're roughly two million god aways.
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: Those are people that crossed the border. We know cross
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: the border, but yet they escaped detection. And those god
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: aways are much much more likely to be criminals. They're
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: much more likely to be murders, rapists, child molesters, terrorists,
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: gang members. And if you look at this radical who
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: attacked and fire bombed the peaceful Jewish protesters in Boulder, Colorado,
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: this was a guy who never should have been in
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: this country to begin with. He came in on a
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: tourist fe say, he overstated, and this was a radical
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: Islamist And and I want to read to you a
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: tweet from Bill Malusion. Now, regular listeners of this podcast
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: know Bill Malusian is the best reporter in America. He
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: reports for Fox News and he's been detailing what's going
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: on at the border. Here's what Bill Malusian tweeted, breaking
• 25:16
  Speaker 2: new details on Colorado terror attack suspect as Feeds charged
• 25:21
  Speaker 2: him with federal hate crime. According to federal court filings
• 25:25
  Speaker 2: obtained by Fox News, Egyptian illegal alien Mohammed Solomon admitted
• 25:32
  Speaker 2: in an interview that he wanted to kill all quote
• 25:35
  Speaker 2: Zionist people, and he had been planning the attack for
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: a year, and that he would conduct the attack again
• 25:44
  Speaker 2: if he could. He allegedly told investigators that he waited
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: to carry out the attack until his daughter graduated high school,
• 25:54
  Speaker 2: and that he specifically targeted the quote Zionist group in
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: Boulder after learning about them from an online search. It
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: was premeditated, as he allegedly admitted, he knew they would
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: gather on Sunday at one pm, he arrived and waited
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: for them. Additionally, investigators found a black container with fourteen
• 26:21
  Speaker 2: more Molotov cocktails near the spot he was arrested in.
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: Inside his vehicle, investigators found paperwork with the words Israel, Palestine,
• 26:35
  Speaker 2: and USAID. This man was admitted into the country via
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: a tourist visa during the Biden administration. He overstayed, filed
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: an asylum request, and was granted work authorization by the
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: Biden administration, which expired at the end of March of
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: this year. So understand, this guy came into this country,
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: he overstated his visa, and yet the Biden administration said, hey, look,
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: a radical Islamic terrorist, we want you to stay. It
• 27:11
  Speaker 2: was not hard to figure out from his social media
• 27:14
  Speaker 2: who this guy was, but the Biden administration they were
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: not focused on defending this nation. They were not focused
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: on stopping terrorists from coming into this country. Instead, they
• 27:26
  Speaker 2: made a political decision. I get asked all the time, Ben,
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: why would Democrats open up the borders? It clearly hurt
• 27:32
  Speaker 2: them in the flat last election. Why would they do this?
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: And I believe it was entirely about power. They viewed
• 27:39
  Speaker 2: twelve million illegal immigrants, they said, listen, every one of
• 27:44
  Speaker 2: these we think are going to vote for Democrats. We
• 27:47
  Speaker 2: want them in here. Some portion of them will vote illegally.
• 27:51
  Speaker 2: The rest of them. They believed, if they stayed in power,
• 27:53
  Speaker 2: they'd grant amnesty and make them all voters. And if
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: they have to bring in Muslim brotherhood terrorists who were
• 28:03
  Speaker 2: murdering people, sadly, the Democrats were willing to do that.
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: Yeah, this is the part that I really think we
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: do need to make it clear, not just now but
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: in the future. The Democratic Party, and you alluded to
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: this in your comments there. Their plan they knew was
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: going to have disastrous consequences from a national security standpoint.
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: They were willing to play Russian Roulette with that open border.
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: And they were warned and they saw the people that
• 28:35
  Speaker 1: were on the terrorists watch list Senator, and they didn't
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: care because it was their overall plan to flood the
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: country with the legal immigrants and fundamentally changes country. They
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: knew this plan would allow for people that are terrorists,
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: some of them on the terrorists watch lists at the time,
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: to get into this country, and they still continued to
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: have the open border policy because they basically said, Hey,
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: it's part of our bigger plan, and there's gonna be
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: collateral damage from this, so be it.
• 29:06
  Speaker 2: And listen when I say this, this sounds harsh, and
• 29:11
  Speaker 2: you sort of think of a listener who's not terribly
• 29:14
  Speaker 2: political and they're like, wait, the Democrats couldn't really want
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: more terrorists in this country. But at the end of
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: the day, that was the inevitable consequence of the policies
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: they put in place when you allow twelve million people
• 29:31
  Speaker 2: to cross the border illegally. And by the way, the
• 29:34
  Speaker 2: Biden Border control the border patrol, they instructed their agents
• 29:41
  Speaker 2: be on the lookout for Hesbela Hamas Palestinian Islamic Jehad
• 29:48
  Speaker 2: terrorists coming across this border. Look, we have radical Zealots
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: who have declared Jahad in America, who have demanded of
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: their terrorists murder as many Americans as you can, and
• 30:01
  Speaker 2: murder as many Jews and Israelis as you can. And
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: in the face of those very real and clear national
• 30:10
  Speaker 2: security threats, the fact that the Biden administration and the Democrats,
• 30:14
  Speaker 2: it wasn't just Joe Biden, it wasn't just Kamala Harris,
• 30:17
  Speaker 2: it was every single Democrat in the Senate, it was
• 30:20
  Speaker 2: every single Democrat in the House. Because they voted in
• 30:23
  Speaker 2: favor of open borders over and over and over again,
• 30:28
  Speaker 2: they knew that some of the people coming were just
• 30:31
  Speaker 2: like this radical And listen, I've reintroduced this week legislation
• 30:38
  Speaker 2: to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. The
• 30:43
  Speaker 2: Muslim Brotherhood.
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: At this is something you've been sounding the alarm on
• 30:48
  Speaker 1: for quite some time. I want to be very clear
• 30:50
  Speaker 1: about that.
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: So I've been fighting for this legislation for more than
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: a decade. The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization. It
• 31:00
  Speaker 2: is in countries throughout the Middle East. It is in Egypt,
• 31:04
  Speaker 2: it is in cutter it is all across the Middle East.
• 31:10
  Speaker 2: And the Muslim Brotherhood openly aggressively they support hamas they
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: support Hesbela. They are a terrorist organization and by the way,
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: to be clear, in Egypt, they're an actual political party. Look,
• 31:26
  Speaker 2: we had Mohammed Morci, who was the leader of Egypt,
• 31:31
  Speaker 2: who was a Muslim Brotherhood radical. Now now thankfully Mohammed
• 31:36
  Speaker 2: Morsei was defeated, and he was defeated by Alsisi, who
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: is fighting against the Muslim Brotherhood. Look. Look if you
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: look at the Arabs who are dealing with this, the
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: Muslim Brotherhood and the Jahadas, they believe in using violence,
• 31:55
  Speaker 2: using murder to force people to embrace their radical is
• 31:59
  Speaker 2: the fore and and yet these are these are the
• 32:06
  Speaker 2: radicals that are fighting, that that are murdering Israelis, and
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: that are murdering Americans, and and and this is exactly
• 32:14
  Speaker 2: the radicals that this lunatic in Boulder, Colorado was embracing,
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: and that Joe Biden, the Democrats were letting end of
• 32:22
  Speaker 2: this country.
• 32:23
  Speaker 1: Final question on the on the the designate of Muslim
• 32:26
  Speaker 1: Brotherhood is a terrorist organization. Is this finally going to
• 32:31
  Speaker 1: be the moment where you think there's a decent chance
• 32:33
  Speaker 1: that this can become reality or there's still going to
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: be Democrats at all costs that say we are going
• 32:38
  Speaker 1: to defend this.
• 32:40
  Speaker 2: So I hope so so right now today, the Muslim
• 32:44
  Speaker 2: Brotherhood is designated as a terrorist organization in Saudi Arabia,
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: They're designated in the United Arab Emirates, They're designated in Egypt,
• 32:54
  Speaker 2: in Syria and Bahrain. But the United States has yet
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. When
• 33:03
  Speaker 2: you have a group that actively encourages the waging of jahad,
• 33:10
  Speaker 2: the murdering of innocence, they are a terrorist organization. And
• 33:14
  Speaker 2: so I pressed, I pressed the entire first Trump term
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: for the Muslim Brotherhood to be designated. We did not succeed.
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: I think we will succeed this administration. I think President
• 33:26
  Speaker 2: Trump is going to do this, and I'm going to
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: keep pressing designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization
• 33:34
  Speaker 2: because that is who they are, and we saw the
• 33:38
  Speaker 2: horrific and potentially deadly consequences this week in Boulder, Colorado.
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: Make sure you share this podcast with your family and friends,
• 33:46
  Speaker 1: put it up on social media wherever you are, and
• 33:49
  Speaker 1: we appreciate you listening every day.
• 33:51
  Speaker 2: We'll see you back here tomorrow