Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Supreme Court Moves in on TRUMP Case in Colorado!

Transcript

Supreme Court Moves in on TRUMP Case in Colorado! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court is officially going to review Donald Trump's
0:06
Speaker 1: Colorado case.
0:08
Speaker 2: Now, this is significant.
0:09
Speaker 1: So I'm going to go through this for you so
0:11
Speaker 1: you understand how we got to where we are and
0:14
Speaker 1: what they're going to be looking at moving forward. You're
0:17
Speaker 1: probably gonna want to take some notes because we're gonna
0:19
Speaker 1: get into some legal aspects of this as well. Now,
0:23
Speaker 1: a lot of my notes, and this came from my
0:26
Speaker 1: conversation I had today with Senator Ted Cruz and we
0:29
Speaker 1: were getting ready to do the podcast I do with him,
0:32
Speaker 1: Verdict with Ted Cruz and I co host, and we
0:34
Speaker 1: were going over how this is going to go down
0:38
Speaker 1: and what's gonna happen. Now, you can listen to that
0:40
Speaker 1: podcast by downloading Verdict with Ted Cruz.
0:43
Speaker 2: In a couple of days, we're going to do a
0:44
Speaker 2: two part on it.
0:45
Speaker 1: But I'm going to give you some of the highlights
0:47
Speaker 1: now so you understand how this is going to play out,
0:50
Speaker 1: and it's going to be very very interesting how this
0:52
Speaker 1: is gonna work. Let me go back and just kind
0:55
Speaker 1: of lay the premise of how we got to this
0:57
Speaker 1: going to the Supreme Court and.
0:58
Speaker 2: Why they agreed to up this case.
1:01
Speaker 1: First off, Colorado banned former President Trump from appearing on
1:07
Speaker 1: the state's Republican primary ballot.
1:11
Speaker 2: The Supreme Court.
1:13
Speaker 1: Decided, okay, we will hear the challenge to this action. Now,
1:18
Speaker 1: this Colorado District Court Judge Sarah Wallace ruled back in
1:22
Speaker 1: November that Trump is not an officer of the US
1:27
Speaker 1: as defined by the fourteenth Amendment, and that the amendment
1:31
Speaker 1: therefore cannot be used to disqualify him from appearing on
1:34
Speaker 1: the primary ballot. However, she's still somehow found that Trump
1:39
Speaker 1: indeed had engaged in insurrection, her words, by inciting the
1:46
Speaker 1: January sixth attacks on the Capitol. Now, let me just
1:49
Speaker 1: stop there, and I want you to think about all
1:51
Speaker 1: of the different.
1:54
Speaker 2: Lawsuits, all the different.
1:58
Speaker 1: Accusations, all of the different indictments of Donald Trump that
2:03
Speaker 1: have happened all over the country. You look at Jack Smith,
2:06
Speaker 1: for example. Jack Smith absolutely hates Donald Trump. He wants
2:13
Speaker 1: to take down Donald Trump at all costs.
2:16
Speaker 2: In fact, he is obsessed with Donald Trump.
2:20
Speaker 1: And Democrats as well are obsessed with Donald Trump, and
2:23
Speaker 1: they want nothing more than to destroy Donald Trump. Make
2:28
Speaker 1: no mistake that that is their objective, that is their goal,
2:31
Speaker 1: that is what they want to do. And yet nowhere
2:35
Speaker 1: in the country has anyone actually filed a lawsuit or
2:41
Speaker 1: i should say, charges against Donald Trump for insurrection.
2:46
Speaker 2: The reason why is actually very.
2:48
Speaker 1: Simple, because on the day leading up to January sixth,
2:54
Speaker 1: the President United States of America called for peace. On the
2:58
Speaker 1: day of January six he called for peace will protests,
3:02
Speaker 1: not only on Twitter, but also in his actual words
3:06
Speaker 1: during that rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol.
3:11
Speaker 1: He said, we are going to be peaceful. We are
3:13
Speaker 1: going to go in peace. It's very clearly there. You
3:16
Speaker 1: can see those tweets that he had on Twitter. They're
3:19
Speaker 1: out there. It's obvious. But then there are also other things.
3:23
Speaker 1: And this is the reason why even Jack Smith, the
3:26
Speaker 1: psycho crazy who's trying to lock up Donald Trump for
3:29
Speaker 1: the rest of his life, and all these other activist
3:32
Speaker 1: das who are trying to lock up Donald Trump and
3:34
Speaker 1: charge him with countless crimes all over the country have
3:38
Speaker 1: not actually charged him with insurrection. Is because they know
3:42
Speaker 1: that the facts clearly show he was not calling for
3:45
Speaker 1: insurrection and not a part of insurrection. Not only that,
3:49
Speaker 1: but they also have another problem, and that problem is this,
3:53
Speaker 1: Donald Trump offered the National Guard up multiple times to
3:57
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC, and they decline
4:02
Speaker 1: to use the National Guard. Now, if you're calling if
4:05
Speaker 1: you're an insurrectionist, why would you be wanting to put
4:08
Speaker 1: in law enforcement and offering up the National Guard? To
4:13
Speaker 1: mobilize the National Guard for January the sixth, that actual day.
4:18
Speaker 1: So there's a problem here, right, he's on an insurrectionist.
4:21
Speaker 1: All of his actions go against the definition of what
4:25
Speaker 1: it even means to be an insurrectionist. And that's why
4:28
Speaker 1: not a single Democrat has charged him. And when you're
4:31
Speaker 1: hearing when you hear these crazies on the media, when
4:33
Speaker 1: you're arguing with these psycholiberal democrats. And I've talked about
4:36
Speaker 1: this a lot on our podcast. So make sure, by
4:39
Speaker 1: the way you download our podcasts, because I do a
4:40
Speaker 1: podcast every day and I want.
4:42
Speaker 2: You to become a listener of it.
4:43
Speaker 1: We give you an update every morning of the biggest
4:45
Speaker 1: stories of the day on our podcast. Grab our podcast.
4:49
Speaker 1: It's free wherever you get your podcasts. And what we
4:51
Speaker 1: talked about in there was the next time you get
4:54
Speaker 1: in a debate, all right, the next time you get
4:57
Speaker 1: into any type of debate with democrats, and like, well,
5:01
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's insurrections, then ask them the question, Okay, if
5:05
Speaker 1: what you're saying is true, then why on earth has
5:11
Speaker 1: not a single Democrat activist DA who's gone after him
5:14
Speaker 1: on all these other issues and all these other charges
5:16
Speaker 1: and everywhere else where they've gone after him. That the
5:19
Speaker 1: question is simple, then why okay, why have they not
5:24
Speaker 1: charged him with insurrection? Why have they not charged Donald J.
5:29
Speaker 1: Trump with insurrection? Somebody answered me that question in the
5:33
Speaker 1: Democratic Party because it keeps saying his insurrections, and I'm like,
5:36
Speaker 1: all right, well, then why did Jack Smith not charge him?
5:38
Speaker 1: Why did the activist DA in Atlanta not charge him?
5:43
Speaker 1: Why did they not charge him anywhere in the country
5:47
Speaker 1: where this was an issue. That's the core question here,
5:50
Speaker 1: and it's because they know that what I just told you,
5:54
Speaker 1: he would not be found guilty, it would be thrown out,
5:58
Speaker 1: it would be appealed and thrown out, and if it
6:00
Speaker 1: went to Supreme Court they would obviously rule that way.
6:03
Speaker 2: It's very very clear.
6:04
Speaker 1: That's why not a single Democrat has gone after him
6:07
Speaker 1: as being a quote insurrection is because he is not,
6:11
Speaker 1: and by the definition, he's not and his actions were
6:14
Speaker 1: the opposite of that. So you go back to this
6:17
Speaker 1: Kilrade District Court Judge Sarah Wallace she knew it, and
6:21
Speaker 1: she ruled that Trump is not an officer of the
6:24
Speaker 1: US is defined by the fourteenth Amendment, and that the
6:26
Speaker 1: amendment therefore cannot be used to is qualify him from
6:28
Speaker 1: appearing on the ballot.
6:30
Speaker 2: So then she basically made up law.
6:32
Speaker 1: She's still somehow found that Trump indeed had engaged in
6:35
Speaker 1: insurrection even though he had not been not been indicted
6:38
Speaker 1: for it, not been convicted of being an insurrectionist, claiming
6:43
Speaker 1: that he inside the January six attack on the Capitol.
6:45
Speaker 1: So therefore, bam, we can get him off the ballot. Now,
6:49
Speaker 1: the Colorados Supreme Court ruled four to three. They're a
6:51
Speaker 1: liberal Supreme court. Just so you know that the Constitution's
6:55
Speaker 1: insurrection clause prohibits former President Trump from appearing on the
6:58
Speaker 1: ballot for the presidency into twenty four which brings us
7:02
Speaker 1: to Last Friday, the Supreme Court announced it's agreement to
7:06
Speaker 1: hear this appeal. Why because they understand that this is
7:11
Speaker 1: a threat to our democracy. Not only do they understand it,
7:15
Speaker 1: but what's even more interesting is Nancy Pelosi understands it
7:19
Speaker 1: as well. And Gavin Newsom out in California understands it
7:25
Speaker 1: as well.
7:26
Speaker 2: That's the part.
7:26
Speaker 1: Here that that really should make you laugh is even
7:30
Speaker 1: they get it, even they understand it. They comprehend that
7:36
Speaker 1: there is no way that you can sit here and
7:39
Speaker 1: say that that Donald Trump should not be on the
7:42
Speaker 1: ballot because it doesn't work right, It doesn't It doesn't
7:45
Speaker 1: work Pelosi.
7:48
Speaker 2: Nancy Pelosi was asked.
7:49
Speaker 1: About this on ABC That on the Sunday Morning shoot
7:54
Speaker 1: Show with George Sepanopplis.
7:56
Speaker 2: Listen to what she said.
7:58
Speaker 3: If you believe he engaged in insurrection under the plain
8:00
Speaker 3: meaning of the fourteenth Amendment, you believe he's ineligible to
8:03
Speaker 3: be president. There's a view of the Constitution in an
8:07
Speaker 3: Article fourteen, section three, that he should not be able
8:11
Speaker 3: to run for president. But that's not the point. The
8:14
Speaker 3: point now is that again, different states have different laws.
8:18
Speaker 3: We don't think in California that it applied in our state.
8:23
Speaker 3: That's what the decision was made here. But anyway, not
8:25
Speaker 3: to go into that, because that's very intricate. What is
8:29
Speaker 3: very clear is that the American people want us to
8:33
Speaker 3: honor our oath to protect and defend the Constitution of
8:36
Speaker 3: the United States.
8:39
Speaker 1: So even Nancy Pelosi saying he shouldn't be kicked off
8:42
Speaker 1: the bout in California and he was not. Why because
8:45
Speaker 1: she knows it would not pass the smell test. So
8:49
Speaker 1: when you've got Democrats like Pelosi who are saying, in essence,
8:54
Speaker 1: let the people decide, it's not.
8:55
Speaker 2: Because she actually believes that.
8:56
Speaker 1: It's because she knows legally that they would lose, lose,
9:00
Speaker 1: and lose badly if they try to push this BS
9:07
Speaker 1: on everyone else. That's what this really boils down to.
9:10
Speaker 1: And she knows that the Supreme Court is going to
9:13
Speaker 1: come down hard on this. Now, let's talk about how
9:18
Speaker 1: this is going to move forward and the timeframe so
9:20
Speaker 1: you understand just how quickly this could actually happen. What
9:24
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court announced it's agreement to hear this appeal
9:28
Speaker 1: is that the Court is actually going to hear arguments
9:31
Speaker 1: oral arguments in the case February eighth. Now that means
9:36
Speaker 1: that they are fast tracking this. And why do the
9:38
Speaker 1: Supreme Court accept this appeal? It takes a majority of
9:41
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justice to accept it. There was obviously more
9:44
Speaker 1: than four. There's a very good chance this could be
9:46
Speaker 1: all nine of them that said, yes, we need to
9:49
Speaker 1: nip this in the butt. There is a good chance,
9:52
Speaker 1: and there is a very good chance, if you're looking
9:54
Speaker 1: at this constitutionally, that this should be a nine to
9:57
Speaker 1: zero decision and a huge rebuke of Colorado and any
10:01
Speaker 1: other psychotic activists, you know, attorney general of any one
10:08
Speaker 1: of these states that has brought that has tried to
10:10
Speaker 1: get Donald Trump off of the ballot by saying, you
10:14
Speaker 1: can't do this. We don't allow this to happen in America.
10:17
Speaker 1: We allow the American people to decide who the president is.
10:20
Speaker 1: We don't pick and choose their candidates for them. That
10:23
Speaker 1: is something that we do not do. Okay, That's that's
10:27
Speaker 1: number one, and I think that's part of the reason
10:30
Speaker 1: why they've decided to do this. Now, the decision, by
10:33
Speaker 1: the way, after they hear these arguments, would will probably
10:37
Speaker 1: come very quickly because Colorado's Republican primary is actually scheduled
10:42
Speaker 1: from March to fifth. Now, this decision, by the way,
10:46
Speaker 1: would impact numerous states as others are trying to do
10:49
Speaker 1: the same exact thing. Let me understand for you, let
10:52
Speaker 1: me rephrase that. Let me explain to you what would
10:56
Speaker 1: happen if the Supreme Court actually cited with Colorado. They
11:03
Speaker 1: would be declaring that Donald J. Trump is ineligible to
11:06
Speaker 1: be president of the United States of America because he
11:08
Speaker 1: is an insurrectionist by the definition. The legal theory for
11:16
Speaker 1: these states rests on Section three of the fourteenth Amendment.
11:20
Speaker 1: It reads this, No person shall be a senator or
11:22
Speaker 1: representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President,
11:27
Speaker 1: or hold any office civil or military under the United States,
11:32
Speaker 1: or as an officer of the United States, or as
11:34
Speaker 1: a member of any state legislature, or as an executive
11:37
Speaker 1: or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution
11:40
Speaker 1: of the United States of America, shall have engaged an
11:43
Speaker 1: insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
11:46
Speaker 1: comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a
11:50
Speaker 1: vote of two thirds of each House, remove such disability. Now,
11:55
Speaker 1: when they wrote this, so you understand context, and I
11:58
Speaker 1: do think that context is obviously very important here. When
12:02
Speaker 1: they wrote this, they were writing this in the context
12:05
Speaker 1: of literally the most deadly war in America's history, of
12:08
Speaker 1: the Civil War, where you had the country that was
12:12
Speaker 1: literally divided and hundreds of thousands of Americans were being
12:16
Speaker 1: wiped out in a civil war. Just so you understand that,
12:20
Speaker 1: now you need to look at how this could impact
12:23
Speaker 1: other states. Colorado is not the only state taking action
12:29
Speaker 1: like this, trying to take away the right of the
12:31
Speaker 1: American people to decide who they want to vote for
12:34
Speaker 1: for president of the United States of America.
12:38
Speaker 2: California, and I said this earlier.
12:40
Speaker 1: I want to put this in perspective for you. California
12:43
Speaker 1: chose the opposite approach of what some of these radical
12:46
Speaker 1: states like Maine. Right, Maine has also disqualified Trump from
12:50
Speaker 1: running on the same grounds, and Trump is appealing that
12:52
Speaker 1: ruling in Maine State court because it's a little bit
12:55
Speaker 1: different there.
12:56
Speaker 2: I'll explain that in a moment.
12:57
Speaker 1: But Gavin Newsom actually opposed the idea of ban Trump,
13:00
Speaker 1: saying he should instead be handed a defeat by voters.
13:03
Speaker 1: Now I can't stand Gavin Newsom, But Gavin Newsom even
13:07
Speaker 1: understands this. Nancy Pelosi, as I played for you a moment, Ago,
13:11
Speaker 1: understands this. And there's also a few states that have
13:14
Speaker 1: already decided against decision like they've done in Colorado. I'll
13:18
Speaker 1: give you an example. Arizona. They were smart. They struck
13:22
Speaker 1: down a citizen led petition to disqualified Trump. Minnesota Supreme
13:27
Speaker 1: Court in November decide that the state party can put
13:31
Speaker 1: anyone at once on its primary ballot. They dismissed a
13:36
Speaker 1: Section three lawsuit, but said plaintiffs could try again during
13:40
Speaker 1: the general election. Michigan's judge there ruled that Congress, not
13:46
Speaker 1: the judiciaries, should decide whether Trump can stay on the ballot.
13:49
Speaker 1: The ruling is obviously being appealed there, and the liberal
13:52
Speaker 1: group behind both of the Minnesota and the Michigan cases,
13:55
Speaker 1: Free Speeds for People, also filed another lawsuit in Oregon,
13:59
Speaker 1: sing to bounce Donald Trump for the ballot there. Now
14:02
Speaker 1: you've also had leftists and the mainstream media echoing their
14:06
Speaker 1: support for these liberal groups, right saying, oh, this is
14:09
Speaker 1: so important, this is the you know, this is we
14:13
Speaker 1: must have this. It's it's so important that we get
14:17
Speaker 1: him off the ballot. And why do they want them
14:19
Speaker 1: off the ballot. Because they're afraid he's actually going to win.
14:22
Speaker 1: It's that simple. They are afraid that he is going
14:27
Speaker 1: to win, and so they don't want people to actually
14:31
Speaker 1: have the ability to vote for who they want to
14:35
Speaker 1: vote for. They don't want him to have the They
14:38
Speaker 1: don't want you, i should say, to have the ability
14:41
Speaker 1: to decide who you want to be president of the
14:43
Speaker 1: United States of America. You look at for example, d
14:48
Speaker 1: C's mayor. I want you to hear what she had
14:50
Speaker 1: to say on Donald Trump. This was on MSNBC about
14:53
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. Here trump appeal of ruling banning him
14:57
Speaker 1: from the Colorado primary ballot. Listen to the and this
15:00
Speaker 1: is truly the mindset the Democratic Party right now.
15:03
Speaker 4: Well, I support every state taking very aggressive action to
15:09
Speaker 4: keep him off the ballot. He is undergoing, you know,
15:14
Speaker 4: court action across America, and I don't know that we
15:19
Speaker 4: have ever had a situation. Actually I do know that
15:21
Speaker 4: we've never had a situation where sitting president could be
15:24
Speaker 4: a convicted felon. And so the uncertainty that people are
15:29
Speaker 4: going to the ballot with is also unprecedented. Is he
15:33
Speaker 4: going to be on the ballot or not? Is he
15:34
Speaker 4: going to be disqualified? Are people going to vote for
15:37
Speaker 4: someone who's not eligible? And so all of those questions
15:41
Speaker 4: need to be answered before the American people go out
15:43
Speaker 4: to vote.
15:44
Speaker 2: But what I think is.
15:45
Speaker 4: Also very important is that people don't sit it out.
15:48
Speaker 4: I've heard too many people saying they're going to sit
15:51
Speaker 4: it out.
15:51
Speaker 2: People have to go out and vote.
15:54
Speaker 1: You listen to what she said, I support every state
15:57
Speaker 1: taking aggressive action to keep him off the ballot.
16:00
Speaker 2: At least she was being intellectually honest. There.
16:03
Speaker 1: She's saying, I don't trust the American people to choose
16:06
Speaker 1: Joe Biden again, so therefore I have to cook the
16:09
Speaker 1: books to make sure that Joe Biden isn't on the ballot.
16:13
Speaker 1: The easiest way to get rid of your political opponent
16:16
Speaker 1: is to lock them up. If you don't believe me,
16:18
Speaker 1: asked Vladimir Putin, Ask Fidel Castro, Ask any dictator or
16:23
Speaker 1: tyrant in the history of the world, the easiest way
16:25
Speaker 1: to get rid of your political opponent, The easiest way.
16:29
Speaker 2: Is to lock them up.
16:30
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what Democrats have been trying to do.
16:33
Speaker 1: They are trying to lock him up, and they want
16:37
Speaker 1: to lock him up so that he can never see
16:40
Speaker 1: the light of day again. And they want him to
16:42
Speaker 1: have a life sentence that's twenty thirty years, right. That's
16:45
Speaker 1: why they're going after him the way they're going after him.
16:48
Speaker 1: But when it comes to again insurrection, not one of
16:52
Speaker 1: these radical activists, attorney generals in any one of these
16:57
Speaker 1: radical states, not one of them folks has charged him
17:01
Speaker 1: with insurrection because they know they would be laughed out
17:06
Speaker 1: of court. Democrats like Bowser should be scared of the
17:12
Speaker 1: repercussions of their actions. Bill Barr, by the way, responded
17:16
Speaker 1: to a question of the former Attorney general and what
17:18
Speaker 1: it means for the Supreme Court to take up this appeal,
17:22
Speaker 1: and I want you to hear what he had to
17:23
Speaker 1: say because it's important. He says he's not supporting Donald
17:27
Speaker 1: Trump for re election. But even Bill Barr says the
17:32
Speaker 1: law is clear. Bill Barr is a guy that, by
17:37
Speaker 1: the way, is totally against Trump. Bill Barr was on
17:40
Speaker 1: Neil Cavedo show on Fox and he was asked a
17:42
Speaker 1: question about the efforts efforts to remove Trump off state ballots.
17:47
Speaker 2: Here's what he said about it.
17:48
Speaker 1: This the former age who does not like Trump, who
17:52
Speaker 1: says he's not supporting Trump.
17:54
Speaker 5: The Attorney General, as you know, the Supreme Court will
17:58
Speaker 5: be taking up February to the arguments for or against
18:02
Speaker 5: Colorado removing Donald Trump from its ballot. Whatever your personal views,
18:07
Speaker 5: and you've made them very clear. Are the former president
18:10
Speaker 5: You think that is an overreach for states to start
18:13
Speaker 5: doing stuff like.
18:14
Speaker 6: That, right, Well, absolutely. I think last time I was
18:19
Speaker 6: on a show, Neil I said, I thought the Supreme
18:21
Speaker 6: Court would take it up very quickly and smack it
18:24
Speaker 6: down very quickly. Regardless of what I think of Trump
18:29
Speaker 6: and the fact that I oppose his renomination, I think
18:32
Speaker 6: he has to be beaten at the ballot box, and
18:35
Speaker 6: these heavy handed efforts to disenfranchise his supporters I think
18:40
Speaker 6: are counterproductive. If anything, they make them stronger.
18:44
Speaker 1: You know, it's counterproductive, And if anything, they make him stronger.
18:51
Speaker 2: Now, why would he say that, because he's right.
18:55
Speaker 1: The left is so eager to go after Donald Trump.
18:59
Speaker 1: The left is so eager to make January six.
19:01
Speaker 2: A day where democracy was threatened.
19:04
Speaker 1: You even had MSNBC's host cry while thinking an officer
19:10
Speaker 1: for his work on January six acting like it was
19:12
Speaker 1: nine to eleven. That's the media for you right now,
19:16
Speaker 1: crying right, crying out there. Thank you so much for
19:20
Speaker 1: holding the line. I'm crying on air. That's MSNBC. They
19:24
Speaker 1: want you to believe that January sixth was truly the
19:27
Speaker 1: worst in American history. And therefore, if you believe that
19:30
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump should not be on the ballot because
19:32
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is an insurrectionist.
19:35
Speaker 2: So if they believe it, put up or shut up.
19:39
Speaker 2: What I mean by that is, then.
19:41
Speaker 1: Go ahead, charge him with insurrection. Charge him with insurrection.
19:51
Speaker 1: That's what you should do. Charge him with insurrection. If
19:56
Speaker 1: you believe that Donald Trump shouldn't be on the ballot,
20:00
Speaker 1: then one of you psychotic anti American socialists, communist Marxist
20:07
Speaker 1: attorney general is of one of these liberal states, then
20:10
Speaker 1: do your job, go after Donald Trump and charge him
20:14
Speaker 1: with insurrection. They're not going to do it. Jack Smith
20:19
Speaker 1: isn't going to do it, and he's crazy. None of
20:22
Speaker 1: these other people are going to do it. And they're crazy.
20:24
Speaker 1: None of these other people. And they hate Trump and
20:27
Speaker 1: they want to lock him up and they want him
20:30
Speaker 1: to rot in prison. They don't do it. They won't
20:34
Speaker 1: do it. So what's going to happen at the Supreme Court?
20:37
Speaker 1: That's question number one that we should answer. I believe
20:42
Speaker 1: there's a very good chance the Supreme Court is going
20:44
Speaker 1: to come down on this, and I think they're going
20:47
Speaker 1: to do it swiftly. Now why, because I think the
20:50
Speaker 1: Supreme Court understands that this is absurd. I think the
20:54
Speaker 1: Supreme Court understands that this is wrong. I think the
20:59
Speaker 1: Supreme Court understands that this is a straight up one
21:03
Speaker 1: thousand percent abuse of power by these states that are
21:10
Speaker 1: trying to do this. I think they're going to believe
21:12
Speaker 1: that it's an American and I also think that they
21:15
Speaker 1: understand that if they did side with Colorado, it means
21:19
Speaker 1: that the President of the United States of America, Donald Trump,
21:22
Speaker 1: former president, would be ineligible in every state in America
21:26
Speaker 1: because then there would be inciant precedents and the presidence
21:30
Speaker 1: would be that Donald Trump is an insurrections. Therefore, he
21:32
Speaker 1: is disqualified and unable to become president of the United
21:37
Speaker 1: States of America. This is much bigger than Colorado. It
21:43
Speaker 1: would take him off the ballot. If they ruled in
21:46
Speaker 1: favor of Colorado on every and it would be mandated
21:50
Speaker 1: to take him off the ballot, he would not appear
21:52
Speaker 1: on any ballot in this country. Wouldn't just be some
21:56
Speaker 1: of these liberal states to be every single state in
22:00
Speaker 1: America would then take him off the ballot. So when
22:04
Speaker 1: you put that into perspective and you think about that,
22:08
Speaker 1: I believe that the Supreme Court is going to look
22:10
Speaker 1: at this and realize, even the most liberal judges, this
22:14
Speaker 1: is not our place, This is not how this should
22:17
Speaker 1: go down, This is not what is supposed to happen.
22:20
Speaker 2: This should not happen.
22:23
Speaker 1: This is wrong, and they're going to understand just how
22:28
Speaker 1: wrong this actually is. They're going to make it clear
22:32
Speaker 1: that you cannot in the United States of America take
22:35
Speaker 1: out your political opponent this way. You cannot take out
22:39
Speaker 1: your political opponent because you don't like them by then
22:43
Speaker 1: just removing them from the ballot. Second part here, that
22:48
Speaker 1: is also a very important aspect of this. They have
22:53
Speaker 1: not charged him with a crime of insurrection. They've charged
22:57
Speaker 1: him with every other crime they can think up with,
22:59
Speaker 1: come up with with, falsify, They've tried to impeach him,
23:03
Speaker 1: not once but twice, and they still Okay, they still
23:08
Speaker 1: have not charged him with insurrection. So will other defiant
23:14
Speaker 1: states follow what the Supreme Court says?
23:16
Speaker 2: I believe they will.
23:19
Speaker 1: I think that they're going to have to because they're
23:21
Speaker 1: going to realize this is going to make them look stupid.
23:23
Speaker 2: And I do believe.
23:24
Speaker 1: I go back to what Bill Barr said, I actually
23:26
Speaker 1: believe that they're right the way they said it. I
23:29
Speaker 1: think they're absolutely right the way that Bill Barr put it,
23:32
Speaker 1: that this only strengthens Donald Trump. Every time that they've
23:36
Speaker 1: indicted Donald Trump, his poll numbers have had steady, stayed steady,
23:40
Speaker 1: or have gone up. That's a fat number one, okay,
23:44
Speaker 1: number two. Every time they come out and try to
23:46
Speaker 1: kick him off a ballot, it strengthens his numbers, not
23:49
Speaker 1: just nationwide but in the state where they're trying to
23:52
Speaker 1: kick him off the ballot, because there are many Americans
23:54
Speaker 1: that understand that this is what you do in communists, socialist,
23:58
Speaker 1: Marxist countries. You lock up your political opponents. That is
24:02
Speaker 1: a problem. And when you lock up you and if
24:05
Speaker 1: you can't lock up your political opponents, then what do
24:07
Speaker 1: you do? You go after them this way. It is
24:09
Speaker 1: also a problem now the Trump's legal team, they're fighting everywhere.
24:18
Speaker 1: And that's part of what the Democratic Party's goal and
24:20
Speaker 1: objective is. Just so you understand that, Okay, the goal
24:24
Speaker 1: and the objective of the Democratic Party is clear, take
24:28
Speaker 1: Donald Trump out of campaign mode by forcing him to
24:31
Speaker 1: go in to the courtroom. Put him in the courtroom.
24:35
Speaker 1: Even if you lose, it's a win because it's one
24:37
Speaker 1: less hour, one less day that Donald Trump is on
24:42
Speaker 1: the campaign trail. That's the goal here, that's the mission here,
24:49
Speaker 1: that's the objective here. That's all they're trying to accomplish.
24:53
Speaker 1: They want Donald Trump off the ballot. Yes, they probably
24:58
Speaker 1: believe they can't accomplish that. But if you can tie
25:01
Speaker 1: him up in court and you can undermine him, and
25:03
Speaker 1: you can make people believe that somehow he is a
25:05
Speaker 1: guy that should not be president, and you can tie
25:09
Speaker 1: him up in court in all of these other scenarios,
25:12
Speaker 1: which they have clearly been able to do so far,
25:16
Speaker 1: and you can continue to harass him and try to
25:19
Speaker 1: bankrupt him, then you're taking him off the campaign trail.
25:24
Speaker 1: And that is the victory. This isn't I don't think
25:28
Speaker 1: about actually kicking him off the ballot. I think Democrats
25:31
Speaker 1: deep down know this was not going to work. I
25:34
Speaker 1: think the Supreme Court is going to, including the liberal Justice,
25:37
Speaker 1: is going to make it clear that this cannot work
25:40
Speaker 1: and this will not work. I want to make that
25:42
Speaker 1: clear as well. I think they're going to come down
25:45
Speaker 1: very hard on this, and the liberal judges are going
25:47
Speaker 1: to be a part of it on the Supreme Court
25:49
Speaker 1: because they understand what a threat this is to the
25:51
Speaker 1: United States of America and more importantly, our democracy, and
25:55
Speaker 1: with precedent, what it would do in the future.
25:59
Speaker 2: But you have to underst the.
26:00
Speaker 1: Overall goal here, the overall goal of the Democratic Party
26:05
Speaker 1: here is to tie Donald Trump up in court. And
26:09
Speaker 1: every time they do that and he is in court
26:12
Speaker 1: and not campaigning, it is helping them win the White House,
26:16
Speaker 1: or it may be a better way of saying it,
26:17
Speaker 1: helping him helping them protect the White House. They know
26:21
Speaker 1: they have a bad candidate. And the Supreme Court jumping
26:25
Speaker 1: all over this as quick as they did and pushing
26:27
Speaker 1: these or arguments as fast as they can and putting
26:30
Speaker 1: this out as quick as they can with the timeline
26:32
Speaker 1: that they've done, they clearly understand what a threat this
26:36
Speaker 1: is to our democracy. I really do think there's a
26:38
Speaker 1: good chance this is going to be a nine to
26:40
Speaker 1: nothing decision. This I think could very well be a
26:45
Speaker 1: unanimous decision with hardcore leftists on the Court who are
26:49
Speaker 1: going to say, you guys have gone so far out
26:52
Speaker 1: of bounds. This is not what we do in the
26:54
Speaker 1: United States of America, and we're not going to send
26:57
Speaker 1: a message that this is a appropriate or should be allowed.
27:03
Speaker 1: All right, Lastly, please make sure you hit that subscribe
27:06
Speaker 1: button or auto download button wherever you are listening to
27:10
Speaker 1: this podcast right now, and take a moment to write
27:13
Speaker 1: us a five star review. Many on the left had
27:15
Speaker 1: been attacking our podcast, writting us bad reviews on purpose,
27:19
Speaker 1: So if you would help us fight back by writing
27:21
Speaker 1: us a good review, a five star review, and share
27:24
Speaker 1: this podcast with your family and friends on social media
27:27
Speaker 1: to help us grow.
27:28
Speaker 2: See you back here tomorrow,