Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Reparations committee proposes total debt forgiveness...$5 million to each longtime African American resident

Transcript

Reparations committee proposes total debt forgiveness...$5 million to each longtime African American resident · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: All right, So you lose a big election like the
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: Democrats just did, and you gotta get your footing back right.
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: You've been knocked down, you're on the mat. What do
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: you do? You go back to what works, what a
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Democrats always use when they lose and they need to win. Racism,
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: that's what you do. You scream racism. I have two
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: headlines right now that are not from Saturday Night Live.
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: They're not parodies. This is real. San Francisco has got
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: some real problems right now. There's two stories here that
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: are gonna collide. So let me give you the first headline,
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: and I'm gonna get back to it so you understand
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: the context of what I'm about to talk about. San
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: Francisco businesses are now demanding full tax refund because of
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: the out of control homelessness and crime that they're having
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: to deal with in the disgusting city. And they're saying,
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: we're not getting anything for our tax dollars. So the
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: San Francisco businesses, and look liberal San Francisco, Nancy Pussy's
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: from there, the place where she gets her haircut when
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: all you couldn't write and colored during COVID, they're now
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: banning together and fighting back against the city and the mayor,
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: and they're saying, we want our money back. This is awesome.
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: I love when democrats like eat each other this way.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: Like you owned San Francisco. You went all woke. You
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: got all these homeless people, you got all this. You know,
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: you're the one given out free syringes. And now all
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: the crackheads came to see you, the meth heads and
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: everybody else, and you got all these people everywhere, just
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: high as a kite. And you may have seen the
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: art gallery guy who's like a liberal. Did you see
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: this guy this last week? And this went viral. There
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: was a homeless person outside of his business that wouldn't leave,
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: and he just had enough because it was hurting his
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: business and he's trying to make a living so he
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: doesn't become homeless. And he used a water hose to
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: spray the homeless person and was caught on video. And
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: his point was, I've just had enough, Like it's ruining
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: my family business, it's ruining my livelihood. Hell, I'm going
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: to be homeless, and this city won't come and stop this.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: She's camped out in front of his front door to
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: his business, and I'm not excusing. I'm just saying everybody's
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: got a breaking point, and this guy clearly has his
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: breaking points. So he took a water hose and started
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: spraying her. Now she's the individual. I mean, we're talking
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: about everything that comes when you're homeless, defecation, smells, urinating,
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: all of these things right there by his business front door.
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: Of course, the media turns on this guy, right because
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: you're water hosing someone down, and goes back to the
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: images of civil rights error. And again this is liberals
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: eating liberals, like this is a liberal guy who's got
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: an art gallery. Ain't some GOP conservative, Okay? And they
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: find him, they docks in there. I go, no, this man,
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: he deserves They go to jail for this, right, And
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: I'm like I'm watching. I'm like, hey, you guys, judge
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: how you want to. I'm just telling you what happened.
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: So these San Francisco businesses are now demanding a full
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: tax refund. What is San Francisco doing. I'm talking about
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: the elected officials. This is amazing. They're trying to find
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: their mojo. Folks, how do you do it? When you
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: can't find your mojo? You scream racism? San Francisco is
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: now has a committee, a reparations committee that is now
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: saying that five million dollars needs to be paid to
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: each black long time resident and have total debt forgiveness
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: for reparations. This is where this is how insane they've become.
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: In California. In San Francisco, the San Francisco Reparations Committee,
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: which was set up by the government to do this,
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: also proposed supplementing lower income recipients. And they want to
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: This is I can't I can't even stay without without laughing.
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: They want to supplement the lower income recipients income four
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty years. How what's the average lifespan
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: of a human being in this country of modern medicine.
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: Let's just call it eighty five years, So two hundred
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: and fifty years, Like anybody living to two fifty. The
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: oldest person in the world died the other day, like
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: one eighteen or one thirteen or whatever it was one twelve,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: the oldest person living in the world, And they're like, yeah,
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: we need to pay for two hundred fifty years. I'd
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: like the full lump sum up front, please, Like this
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: is like this is like winning the lottery and taking
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: the thirty year payout when you're a hundred, Like, that's stupid.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: San Francisco put together this reparations committee and now they've
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: come back with their findings. They believe that they should
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: pay each black long time resident five million and grant
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: total debt forgiveness due to the decades a systemic repression
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: faced by the local black community. The San Francisco African
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: American Reparation Advisory Committee, which advises the city, this is official.
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: Does this government work for you idiots in San Francisco?
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: I love it on developing a plan for reparations for residents.
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: They released their report and they said, we've got it.
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: We're gonna address this. This is what we found. Now
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: here's the other thing that's crazy about these reparations. And
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: pay close attention, okay, because this is what you need
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: to understand. They're paying the reparations. And I'm quoting here
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: from their report. My producers trying not to laugh right
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: now as he sits across me. They're not paying them
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: for slavery. This is what he found. The nugget He
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: was like, dude, you gotta read this. Please help me out, like,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: please read this. As they've been like he was jazzed
• 5:31
  Speaker 1: up before the show. He said, Ben, they're they're not
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: saying the five million dollars has anything to do with slavery. This,
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: in fact, it's not for slavery. Now I say that,
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: and you want to know why, Right, Well, here you go,
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: since California was not technically a slave state, you couldn't
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: pay five million dollars somebody for slavery because it didn't
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: actually happen. So instead, they say, and I'm reading for
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: the report, it is to address the public policies explicitly
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: created so objate black people in San Francisco by holding
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: and expanding the intent and legacy of chattel slavery. Yes,
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: did I say that word? Right? He is laughing at me. Chattel, chattel, chattel?
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: Which one is it? However, I said it. You can
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: just make sure you fix it, Okay, when you put
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: when you throw up the podcast, chattel? Is that right? Okay?
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: I got it right. He looked at me like I
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: was crazy. Well, neither San Francisco nor California formally adopted
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: the institution of chattel slavery. The tenants of segregation, they say,
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: white supremacy and systemic repression and exclusion of black people
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: were codified through legal and extra legal actions, social codes,
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: and judicial enforcement. The reparations document states, the draft plan
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: includes a long list of financial recommendations for black San
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: Francisco residents. Now, if you're half black, half white, we
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: don't know if you get two point five million or not.
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: That's my first question. I just want to note, like
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: if your mix race, do you get less? Like if
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: you're one fifth are one eight black and your heritage,
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: do you get one million dollars instead of five million?
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: I want to know how the money comes out here.
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: And anyone that's not, like, you know, one hundred percent
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: all in for the five million is gonna want to
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: ask that question too. I'm not the only one, Das,
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: You've got African American in you, right at some point
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: you said, He says he can find it for a
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: million dollars. The draft plan includes a long list of
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: financial recommendations for black San Francisco resons, including a one
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: time lump some payment of the five million to each
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: eligible individual. All right, real quick, let me pause and
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: tell you about our incredible friends over at Patriot Mobile.
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: They are America's only Christian conservative cell phone provider. They
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: want to make it easy for you to try switching
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: to Patriot Mobile from whatever service you have right now.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: You can give them sixty days to show you why
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: I use Patriot Mobile and why you should make the
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: switch right now. When you try Patriot Mobile for two months,
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: you get your third month free, plus you get free
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: activation now. They offer nationwide coverage on the best four
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: G and five G networks, and they use the same
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: exact cell towers of all of the three other major carriers.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: You're gonna get the same coverage you have right now,
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: You get the same great service. You get to keep
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: your same cell phone number if you want to. You
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: can even usually use the same phone you have in
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: your hand right now. Now, Why do you want to switch?
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: When you do, they actually stand up for a First
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: and Second Amendment rights, and they give a portion of
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: your bill every month back to conservative Christian causes that
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: we all believe in. So, if you're ready to support
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: a comy that's fighting to preserve our God given rights
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: and our freedoms, just go to Patriot Mobile dot com
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson, or
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: you can call them nine seven to Patriot. That's nine
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: seven to Patriot. If you're fed up with woke companies
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: that don't care about your values, support a company that
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: actually does make the switch Today get a free month
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: of service plus free activation Patriot Mobile, dot Com slush
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: ferguson or nine seven two Patriot. Now, the lump sum
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: payment would compensate the affected population for the decades of
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: harms that have been experienced and will redress the economic
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: and opportunity losses the black San Francisco San Franciscans have
• 9:37
  Speaker 1: endured collectively as a result of both intentional decisions and
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: unintended harm perpetrated by city policy. So five million dollars
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: if you do the math on this immediately, San Francisco
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: would like go bankrupt, like instantly if they pay this out.
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: So it's unrealistic. And again this is beyond incompetency. To
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: be eligible for the program, they're gonna, of course discriminate
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: against some people. The applicant must be eighteen years old.
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: So if you're seventeen and black, screw you in San Francisco.
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: And that's what they're just saying. If you're seventeen, three
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: hundred and sixty four days years old. Screw you, you're done.
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: The applicant must be eighteen years old and have identified
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: as black or African American on public documents for at
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: least ten years. Well that's racist, right, What if you
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: don't have those documents, I'm gonna use the voters thing. Okay.
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: So you know how Democrats that was racist to ask
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: for voter ID or some sort of government ID to
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: get to vote, right, they said it was racist and
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: it was just you were trying to scriminate against minority
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: communities and black people in America because and by the way,
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: that's maybe one of the most racist statements in modern
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: political history by a party to imply that black people
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: are somehow so far behind the times they don't have
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: a government ID. Think about how racist that statement is, Like, oh,
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: you're black, Yeah, we don't expect you to have an ID.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: We expect white people to have it, in Asian people
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: to have it, in Hispanic people, but black people, no, no, no,
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: you guys don't have id' you're that far behind. Like,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: there's not a more racist statement from the Democratic Party
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: in modern political history. But they're immediately now saying we
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: gotta have an ID that's racist by their own standards,
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: Like by their own standards, that is now racist. So
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: you're discriminating against people under the age of seven eighteen,
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: and you're discriminating against people who don't have an ID.
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: You again, they must be They may prove at least
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: two of eight eligible criteria, not just one the ID
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: right eighteen years old, have identified as black African American
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: on public documents for at least ten years. So if
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: you identify as something else, now it's sexist and racist, right,
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: because if you identify as other or non black, or
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: don't I don't identify as anything with a color of
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: your skin, you're screwed. You have to identify consistently for
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: ten years. So the same people they're telling you a
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: man can be a woman, a woman can be a man,
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: you can choose your own sex, are now saying but
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: when it comes us paying you five million dollars, damn it,
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: you have to be black. And that has to be
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: for a decade straight on documents. You don't have that,
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: you don't get the money. It's one hell of a
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: racist requirement if you ask me. Number two. They must
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: also prove at least two of eight additional criteria, choosing
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: from a list that includes you're ready for this, born
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: in San Francisco between nineteen forty and nineteen ninety six,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: that's your option one. And have proof of residency in
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: San Francisco for at least thirteen years, and or personally
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: or the direct descent of someone incarcerated by the failed
• 12:32
  Speaker 1: War on drugs. So if your mom or dad's a
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: crackhead or with selling marijuana or cocaine or heroin on
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: the streets of San Francisco killing people, that now gets
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: you five million dollars because the war on drugs was failed.
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: And of course they say the War on drugs is racist,
• 12:49
  Speaker 1: right because it was predominantly locking up they're saying disproportionately
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: African American men and women. The plan also calls on
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: the city to supplement lower income recipient. So if you're
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: poor and broke, we'll give you even more money. Right
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: if if you've worked your ass off and you've gone
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: to college and you took out loans and or you
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: start your own business, yeah, we're gonna screw you. The
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: plan yet listen. Gearfleet calls on the city to supplement
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: lower income recipient's income to reflect the area's medium income.
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: Now in San Francisco, the median income they call it
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: the AMI is about ninety seven thousand hours annually, and
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: they want that to be that for at least two
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty years. So let's go back qualifications. You
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: gotta have screamed your black for ten years, and if
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: you didn't, you're screwed. You gotta be over eighteen, and
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: you have to have an additional requirement on top of that,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: which includes if you are personally put in jail for
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: killing people through drugs, right like you're you're a drug
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: dealer or the direct descendant of a hardcore drug dealer
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: that was incarcerated for selling a drug that was killing
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: the community. That's a requirement. That's what that's reading. That's reaching. Now,
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: two of the requirements needed for you to get paid. Now,
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: let's talk about the two hundred and fifty years here
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: and at least the ninety seven thousand supplemental. Why would
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: anybody work just live in San Francisco. You don't have
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: to work, and we'll give you this money for two
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: hundred and fifty years. You don't have to work, Like
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: if you live in San Francisco right now and this
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: goes through. Not only do you get a five million
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: dollars payment, but we're also going to supplement your income
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: for two hundred and fifty years, they say. Quote in
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: this official report, racial disparities across all metrics have led
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: to a significant racial wealth gap in the city of
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: San Francisco. By elevating income to match or ami, black
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: people can better afford housing and achieve a better quality
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: of life for two hundred and fifty years. The plan
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: also seeks to establish a quote comprehensive debt forgiveness program.
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: So if you've racked a bunch of debt, we got
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: governed that clears each eligible person student and housing loans.
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: So buy a house, folks, and we'll pay off your house.
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: Also included in here could be credit card debt. So
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: if you've been like looking up a bunch of porn online,
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: buying a bunch of stuff on QVC, maybe buying a
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: bunch of eape pins, all on credit cards, we'll pay
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: that shs you know what off to Why here's another
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: quote ready for the racism from actual black people on
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: other black people in minorities, Black households are more likely
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: to hold costlier because again You're stupid, is what they're saying. Here,
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: risk your debt and are more likely to have outstanding
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: student loan debt. The draft explains that's such a racist statement, like, oh,
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: you're black, Yeah, we don't expect you to pay your bills.
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: That's what they're saying in an official document. This is
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: racism from the Democratic Party in San Francisco, who is
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: literally saying, we expect black households to be irresponsible, stupid,
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: risk your debt, more likely to not pay your bills.
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: This is in writing. When this is combined with lower
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: household incomes, quote unquote, it can create a cycle, an
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: inexcapable cycle of debt. Their words, not mine. Therefore, we
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: should eliminate this debt, which gives black households an opportunity
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: to build wealth, applying that they're going to build wealth
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: if you pass their debt instead of going directly back
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: into debt. That's how stupid they are, Like you can
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: go look at how many people win the lottery and
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: a lot of people, it doesn't matter if you're black, white, Hispanic,
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: or in the state, win the lottery and they file
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: for bankruptcy and how many years. Look at how many
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: pro athletes usually file for bankruptcy within two years of
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: their last game. If you are not taught financial literacy,
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: which we do not teach in our public schools, you
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: are going to make the same mistakes. How I've had
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: this debate with like literally family members. It doesn't matter
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: how much money any human being has. If you spend
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: everything you make, you are broke. I know millionaires have
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: had millions in debt and they went broke. They when
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: the economy made any type of turn. If you don't
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: teach financial literacy, you can give five million dollars just
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: like when the lottery to any person, and it will
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: disappear because there's no financial literacy. They don't know what
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: to do with the money. So if you give a
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: crackhead five million dollars, what is the crackhead going to do.
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: They're going to squander the five million dollars and they're
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: going to go right back to where they were before
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: the five million dollars. This is not going to fix
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: any of the problems in San Francisco. The committee has
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: said to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors that this
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: needs to be done now. The African American quote the
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: African American Reparations Advisory Committee has not yet received any
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: feedback from the board regarding the position on the recommendation
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: or when the Board will schedule a hearing to formally
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: discuss the plan. Why because well, there's a problem here.
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: Do the math on what they just propose. There's no
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: way that San Francisco could survive. Everybody who has money,
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: by the way, we'll move out of San Francisco because
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: they're not going to want to pay for this. Number One, Like,
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: if you want to kill a city, this is how
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: you do it. San Francisco is already turning into Detroit,
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: and it's already turning into Chicago. This would be You
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: want to talk about a slum of all slums, like
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: people would leave immediately. Quote, there are so many efforts
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: that result in incredible reports that just end up gathering
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: dust on a shelf. We cannot let this be one
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: of them. One of the board members said, We'll trust
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: me it will be because again, at some point you
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: have to ask a question, who's gonna pay for this? Now,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: if you think this is just San Francisco, this is
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: a story too. I told you about House. Democrats are
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: now pushing right because they know how are in control
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: of Congress. A reparations committee at the federal level modeling
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: San Francisco Representative Sheila Jackson Lee Democrat, introduced a bill
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: criminalizing she didn't do this, by the way, when Democrats
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: are in charge of the House, just so you know,
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: because again you gotta play the race card, right, all right,
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: we got we got her a blessed his kick. What
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: do we do down? All right, let's scream racism on everything,
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: and let's get legislation that screams at all those people
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: on the other side of they are racists. Yeah, let's
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: do that. If it ain't broke, why change it? Right,
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: let's worked for them. How many elections? How many decades?
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: Is screaming racism? Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, all these guys, right,
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: black lives matter? Have you noticed that black lives matter?
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: No one like in the African American community has really
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: gotten angry yet about how much money Black Lives Matter embezzled.
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: It's all there. We have the documentation. They bought houses,
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: they bought cars, about airplanes, private jets, like like I
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: donate to Black Lives Matter? I mean, you had a
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: multibillion dollar free ad campaign for black Lives utter you had,
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: you held Corporate America hostage. Everybody was Black Lives Matter?
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: I bet you if you ask people, like in politics,
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: name ID matters, right, you can't get elected without ninety
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: plus percent name I D. Everybody knows what who Donald
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: Trump is? Right, everybody knows who Bill Clinton is, everybody
• 19:51
  Speaker 1: knows who Barack Obamas, and everybody knows what Black Lives
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: Matter is. You had this hundreds of billions obably in
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: advertising the equivalency a Black Lives Matter done for free
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: with Corporate America on the uniforms on the end, zones,
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: all this stuff right, and you're like at work now?
• 20:10
  Speaker 1: Was the money used for Black Lives Matter? Note? Did
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: they buy a single house for people in poverty? Nope?
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: Do they buy cars for people that need cars to
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: get to work when they actually had jobs? Nope? Do
• 20:18
  Speaker 1: they do anything to really improve the community. No? But man,
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: it got people elected, didn't it. Right? You don't vote
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: for this person, you're anti black, you're a racist. Democrats
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: could have passed the legislation that Sheila jacksonally just proposed,
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: but they never introduced it when the Democrats are in
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: charge the House, which means they could have said to
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: the Senate they were in charge of, which means the
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: president can assigned it. So you wait till the Republicans
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: getting charging. You scream racist. You're all a bunch of racists.
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: Sheila jacksonally introduces this House bill criminalizing conspiracy to commit
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: white supremacy, which includes criticism of non white people which
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: influences an individual to commit a hate crime. I'll give
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: you example. Donald Trump says something they don't like. They
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: say it inspired white people to commit crimes against black people,
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: and then Donald Trump gets arrested. That's what this bill says,
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: or any other conservative they don't like. Ben Ferguson. The
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: legislation HR sixty one Leading Against White Supremacy Act of
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty three, because apparently this you know what, didn't
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: matter in twenty twenty two, introduced by Democratic Congressman Sheila Jacksonally,
• 21:28
  Speaker 1: seeks to quote, prevent and prosecute white supremacy inspired hate
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: crime and conspiracy to commit white supremacy inspired hate crime
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: by those that inspire it. This is deep, folks. The
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: legislation would criminalize conspiracy to commit white supremacy, which includes again,
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: as you're screwed, okay, you are screwed, dude. This is
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: in the bill. I'm going to give you the exact words.
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: Any criticism of non white people that influences such as
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: something published or said online or someone who commits a
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: hate crime. So you write something online that you don't
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: that they don't like, they can then charge you with
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: and connected to someone who did a crime against a
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: black person or any person of color, any minority, and say, well,
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: they really do this because Ben Ferguson tweeted this out
• 22:19
  Speaker 1: three years ago. This, by the way, all goes back
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: to January sixth, and that's part of the reason why
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: she's filed this bill now and didn't do it last year,
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: because they want to say that if they can connect
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: you in any fashion to inspiring any person that does
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: a crime, then you're a criminal. This is how you
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: get rid of your political enemies. It's very smart. It
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: also tells you how scumbaggy the Democrats are. They didn't
• 22:50
  Speaker 1: believe any of this was needed until they weren't in power,
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: and now once they're not in power and they know
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: that they can't pass it, they can at least scream
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: racism the other side of racist for not supporting their bill.
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: But this also, and the reason why I am worried
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: about this legislation is you're now trying to hold people
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: accountable legally and held them responsible legally for the thoughts
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: and actions of people they have never met. I'm going
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: to use an example of this that is different, but
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: it's you'll understand, Democrats have been obsessed and they actually
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: been trying to do this in places like Illinois and
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: California and Connecticut, in New York and Baltimore, right where
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: they say you should be able to sue the gun
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: manufacturer and hold them liable if you are shot with
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: a firearm that they produced. This has never happened yet
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: where it's been held up because if you did that,
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: what would immediately happen is every gun manufacturer would stop
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: selling guns because they could not afford the legal defense
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: fund that would be needed to defend themselves. Because every
• 24:03
  Speaker 1: single time someone uses a gun, a gang member shoots
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: another gang member, the first person's going to get sued
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: is the gun manufacturer used in the gun crime. And
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: it's a way to outlaw guns without having to all guns.
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: It's a workaround, right, every gun shop would stop being
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: able to I mean, the price of a gun would
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: go to one hundred and fifty thousand dollars two hundred
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: thousand dollars. No one could afford to manufacture them. The
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: black market would explode, and these manufacturers would immediately go bankrupt,
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: just to fing themselves in litigation. January sixth is their
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: gateway to the same thing they're trying to do with guns,
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: which is okay. We want to say that if you
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: went on the radio or on social media, or as
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: a politician you said anything we don't like, we want
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: to criminalize you for the actions of others who were
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: quote inspired by you. Now imagine if we did this
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: in other areas of life. I used gun example, but
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: screw that one for a minute. Let's use the example
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: of a car. If you can hold everybody liable for
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: the actions of people you never met with your product,
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: then no one could buy anything or do anything. Right. Starbucks,
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: I'm not gonna use alcohol. I'm gonna use Starbucks. You
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: go to Starbucks and you get a coffee, and you're
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: driving after you leave Starbucks and you kill somebody, and
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: you could say, well, they were distracted by Starbucks and
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: they're amazing coffee, and therefore we're going to sue Starbucks.
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: Everybody thinks about that example and things insane. No different
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: what they're trying to do now, No different what they're
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: trying to do with guns. Let's use fast food. There
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: would every drive through in America would immediately close if
• 25:45
  Speaker 1: you could sue the person, the Hamburger company which the
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: person was eating while driving the car. Taco Bell would
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: go under, Every restaurant would go under if you could
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: hold them liable, financially liable and charge them with crimes
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: for the for a crime that was committed by an
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: individual while they were in possession of your good Take
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: it a step further than that. Imagine how many cars
• 26:14
  Speaker 1: you couldn't buy if every time a car was a
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: car manufacturer was involved in an accident, someone was speeding,
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: texting while driving right, and you could sue AT and T,
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: and you could sue iPhone, or you could sue Samsung,
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: or you could sue the manufacturer, the Honda or the
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: Chevy or the Ford and and hold all them liable
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: for the actions of the driver. And then you could
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: sue the Levi Jedons they were wearing, and the Nike
• 26:40
  Speaker 1: shoes they were wearing, and the watch that they may
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: have looked down at. So now Rolex get sued, this
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: wouldn't You can't have a society if you have this
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: type of liability for people. That's what Sheila Jackson Lee
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: just did. This bill, which which was referred to the
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: Committee of the Judiciary, states that someone who engages in
• 27:00
  Speaker 1: a white supremacy inspired hate crime quote when white supremacy
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: ideology has motivated the planning, development, preparation, and perpetration of
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: actions that constituted a crime or were undertaken in furtherance
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: of activity that if it was effectively educated right, would
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: have constitute a crime. Okay, So accordingly they say, quote
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: conspiracy to engage in white supremacy inspired by hate inspired
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: excuse me, hate crime entails the publishing a material. So
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: if you're in an article, website, online, radio show, TV
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: show and they believe or deem it to be advancing
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: white supremacy, white supremacy ideology based on replacement theory, or
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: hate speech that vilifies or is otherwise directed against any
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: non white person or group. So I go out and
• 27:55
  Speaker 1: talk against Black Lives Matter, immediately I could be charged
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: for any crime that any person did saying it was
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: against Black Lives Matter. Thing say, well, they were inspired
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: by Ben Ferguson, they were inspired by Tucker Carlson, they
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: were inspired by Sean Hannity, they were inspired by Fox
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: and Friends, they were inspired by Fox News Channel because
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: they were talking bad about Black Lives Matter. And then
• 28:17
  Speaker 1: this person said they went out there and commit a
• 28:19
  Speaker 1: crime against Black Lives Matter or a Martin Luther King
• 28:22
  Speaker 1: Day parade or whatever it may be. And it was
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: because of all these people were all aimed. You know,
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: we're all named in the lawsuit in charge of crimes
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: now by the federal government. It also, by the way,
• 28:34
  Speaker 1: calls for the DOJ, the Department of Justice, to gain
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: authority to conduct operations listen carefully, and activities pursuant to
• 28:42
  Speaker 1: what is deemed necessary and appropriate to interdict, mitigate, or
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: prevent such actions from culminating in violent activity. So what
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: they're now saying is the dj should have the ability
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: to go and arrest any person, any author, any writer,
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: any speaker, any social media individual who does or says
• 29:03
  Speaker 1: something they believe could inspire one crazy out of three
• 29:07
  Speaker 1: hundred and sixty five million in America to commit a crime.
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: The bill would grant the department authority to quote prosecute
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: persons engaged in such actions with records of white supremacy
• 29:20
  Speaker 1: inspired hate crimes, maintained an annual report should also be
• 29:24
  Speaker 1: provided to Congress so that they know who all they're arresting. Now,
• 29:30
  Speaker 1: I think Lauren Bobert is not a serious person, but
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: she did say something that was interesting, all right, Congresswoman Colorado,
• 29:38
  Speaker 1: she has now accused Democrats of making a mockery of
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: the First Amendment, saying she said this in a tweet.
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: In case you weren't aware of what the Democrats were
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: prioritizing in one hundred and eighteenth Congress, just take a look.
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: When they're not bankrupting our country, they're busy making a
• 29:51
  Speaker 1: mockery of the First Amendment. Because and she's by the
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: way right on this one. I'll give full credit, congressmen.
• 29:59
  Speaker 1: She'll Jacksonally introduced a bill that would make it a
• 30:01
  Speaker 1: federal crime for white people and white people only. Okay,
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: this is attack on white this is racism, attack on
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: a group of people based on the color of their skin.
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: That's what Sheila Jacksonally is now doing, making it a
• 30:14
  Speaker 1: federal crime for white people and white people only to criticize,
• 30:18
  Speaker 1: for example, you're ready mass immigration. You can't say anything
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: in this bill based on how it's written that she
• 30:25
  Speaker 1: claims would vilify a non white person or group. So
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: if you say that there's an invasion of legal immigrants
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: at the border, with the facts to back it up,
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: it doesn't matter because now you're talking against an ethnic group,
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: and only if you are white can you be charged
• 30:42
  Speaker 1: of a federal crime. If you are African American talking
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: about an open border, you're fine. If you're Asian American
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: or just Asian, or any other minority, anybody outside of
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: a white person. If you're half black, half white, I
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: don't know what happens to you. If you're half black,
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: half Hispanic, I don't know what happens to you. If
• 30:59
  Speaker 1: you're half white, half hispanic. I'm assuming you still go
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: to jail. But this bill says that this they will
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: come in. It's a federal crime, a felony. They will
• 31:09
  Speaker 1: lock you up if you, as a white person and
• 31:12
  Speaker 1: white people only criticize illegal immigrants coming across the border
• 31:15
  Speaker 1: because you're criticizing a minority group. That is what is
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: in the bill. It's not just disturbing, it's also not surprising.
• 31:23
  Speaker 1: This is what you would refer to as anti white legislation. Now,
• 31:26
  Speaker 1: if I say that, could I inspire someone that's a
• 31:29
  Speaker 1: white supremacist to be angry right now based on this bill?
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: The show I just did exposing what I just exposed,
• 31:35
  Speaker 1: would mean that the federal government, the DJ mean, the
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: FBI could raid my radio studio right now, arrest me,
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: and then find a white supremacist to commit a random crime,
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: whether he was inspired directly indirectly from the show because
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: I just exposed this bill and I was talking out
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: against this bill. If this bill passed, they could actually
• 31:55
  Speaker 1: lock me up and I would never see my wife
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: or kids again. Well I would, but through a glass window.
• 32:01
  Speaker 1: That's the Democratic Party right now. That's what they're working on.
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: There's one question you should ask yourself, and that is this,
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: Why are they doing this now and why did they
• 32:12
  Speaker 1: not do this when they had the chance to pass
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: this right Why are they doing this now and why
• 32:18
  Speaker 1: did they not do it when they had the chance
• 32:20
  Speaker 1: to pass it. I can answer that question very easily.
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: It is because now, when you lose your mojo and
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: you're a Democrat, this is the time for you to
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: scream racism. That's how you get your mojo back. Make
• 32:36
  Speaker 1: sure you share a podcast. Please rise the five star review,
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: hit that subscriber auto DOWNO button, and I will see
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: you back here tomorrow