Latest / Palafox Media Network / Kingdom Revelations: 4th of July Debate and More ...
Transcript
- speaker-0: Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the show. ⁓ I'm Charles Barfrey, the host of King of Revelations, and surely I'll be joined by Greg Bink and we're gonna talk about the latest news and information that affect us in this society called America. And but before we get to that I wanna get to my ⁓ commentary. Barkfield on the mic. My brothers and sisters in America. This weekend we as Americans will be celebrating, songs will be celebrating. America's two hundred and fifty birthday. I don't celebrate this because we haven't been embraced fully yet. Two hundred and fifty years ago, America had a constitution, a constitution where black people, my ancestor ancestors, were still slaves. And here it it's offensive to me that we have not tried to do right by our lack of citizens in this country. Black people have been three fifths. of a human being by law on the highest course in this nation. We have contributed to the wealth of this nation. The black slaves was the single most profitable economic wealth building for this nation. Trillions upon trillions of dollars at beginning this nation. And that wealth has never been equalized, made fair, no nothing but broken promises. Black Americans were promised forty acres in a year after Lincoln and and after reconstruction. But the next president Johnson came in and voted that. Again, veil promises never materialize and it's time for America to do right by its black citizens. In in fact historically, all the evidence is very clear. The black Indians, what we call black people, Negroes, African Americans, Moors, Seminoles, Chick chop Indians, whatever euphemism, whatever the adjective of the time, black people were the original people in this nation way before among those that we call Indians that have been ⁓ squished out from historical standpoint, who's here first. So America here this weekend will be celebrating what are we celebrating, slavery? 'Cause w what are we really celebrating? I know for some, you know, it was a good time to drink beer, to have barbecue, and fellowship with family and friends, but have we really took a second to look at the man, woman in the mirror and reflect about what is this war for you? Seventeen seventy six to a black person, to a black man, to a black woman, to a black child, for slavery, was lynching, was killing. When you were so property. And and and oftentimes my wife only said, Well, that was dead, Charles, get over it. No, you still got the well, you still doing the injustice right now when you see a police officer with their neck on video for black citizens that you kill a police officer that can kill a black citizen in live real time. And the police officer can go walk and not go to jail. And sometimes they go to jail for a few months or so. And then they then they sue and the police benevolent association gives them a big paycheck. Why? Continual perpet perpetual discrimination against black people. The human cause at the time of slavery s was we were we're prohibiting education at the time, suppression. of our creativity, all of our entrepreneurial assets, building, creating things. Black people vent this, invented that, and it was stolen, taken. White company, white corporations stole things, black invention, because we didn't have legal rights to patent and trademark. The intellectual property. That is hard to put a dollar amount of the impact with that. But The continual injustice is the problem here. In seventeen seventy-six, slavery was locked in the 13 colonies. Enslaved African people and their descendants, their children, their babies, was for the white masters. And they were treated property. Dead slavery, chattel slavery is not the slavery that many other nations did in terms of economic slavery. That if you had a debt, you paid the debt off so you can have funds to pay for monetary economic contract. That's different from chapter slavery where you had no chance. Your babies belonged to the white master as property, like cows, like horses, like like animals. So all thirteen colonies, black people, children, babies were sold, inherited, mortgage. denied fundamental rights, civil rights. Even the free blacks that wrote their slavery had extensive legal restrictions all by ch pigmentation. And their skins, our ancestral skin, the economic impact of the tobacco rights, indigo, sugar, banks, textile mills, the Chinese help with the railroad building. But yet and still Only the black American never been paid reparations in this country. The healing cause of steel, a fraud. Jim Crow, segregation, the civil rights, the nineteen sixty-five Civil Rights Act in the bull on that has been eviscerated. It's been destroyed in this country. So this is 2026. This Supreme Court has basically not gutted, but eliminated the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty-five. That made America the redeeming country that everybody else wanted to eliminate or to be like. So what do we what do we have as black Americans who celebrate? No more civil rights. Continued discrimination, equity, diversity, equity, inclusion in a race, built by black authors, historical perspective, eliminated by the hostility of the Supreme Court and this presidency. So I won't be celebrating because I have nothing to celebrate yet. But am I hopeful? Am I optimistic that somehow we can turn around? Yes, I'm still hopeful. But we need results at this point. And so we're gonna be talking about American birthday and some of the world events as I bring in my good friend Greg Feeney. And so, Greg, welcome to the show. How you doing this afternoon? speaker-1: I'm doing pretty good. It's been a pretty interesting week. How you doing today? ⁓ speaker-0: I'm doing good. It's it's always a blessing when we have the the the the the the the the God give us a influencing call of life and we have a season to to to be here and so I try to make the best out of regardless of from up or down I'm still winning as long as I'm I'm living. So I'm trying to make an influence and impact. So but it's been a great day. speaker-1: Good. I mean I I I heard what you just said about the ⁓ Independence Day and about the Fourth of July and about the celebration or the lack thereof of it. And I definitely understand everything you're coming from. I mean I guess from my point of view the the reason for celebrating it is so, you know, because our independence from a nation that w did not allow us to do what we're doing right now in this show. And ⁓ I mean, you know, granted that might be just oversimplifying a little bit from your point of view, but ⁓ I mean the the freedoms that we have as you know, as much as you think or a lot of people might think that we don't have a lot of freedoms today compared to what we had then are a lot different now. And I think I and and you are right. I mean it was, you know, the ⁓ the Caucasian, the white slave owner you know, slave owners and everything else who were who were came over here from England and Germany and France to settle the thirteen colonies. And there was, you know, a lot of things that were done wrong and there's no disputing that. Nobody's disputing that. I don't think. I mean, if they are, they're idiots. But that being said, I think, you know, my celebration of the Fourth of July is celebrating from the ⁓ Church of England and celebrating from England's tyranny and and the tyranny that we saw there as i in in in that time. However, that being said, I mean, not saying that it was perfect whenever they came over here and settled, but it's, you know I mean, America's a work in progress as we all talk about every day. There's nothing perfect. I mean, we have a democratic republic society. People always think we're just a democracy. We're not a democracy. We're a actually a a representative republic. And so that that's actually the reality of the the structure of government that we are. And that being said, we're represented by the ⁓ the people who are elected and that is done by the the voters out there who are, you know, who change with the times and We had a very different society in the seventeen hundreds, in the eighteen hundreds than we have now. And society has progressed. I do think that we have done a lot to get out of the ⁓ direction that we were going. We still have a lot a long way to go. To anybody who thinks that there is no racism or there's no hatred out there is just naive to the fact that, you know, there is. I mean there's discrimination in every single race and every single religion. I mean, but but it's lot more than just black and white or Hispanic or Asian. I mean it's a it it's a multilateral approach and driven by hate and evilness and evil tendencies. And ⁓ and that's what, you know, all the racism in the past and all the racism that we see today and all the, you know, discrimination on all different levels are are driven by the devil and Satan and by hate. Period. And so I mean I mean, it's kinda ironic that whenever we talk about the independence, we're talking about independence from a church and we're a Judeo Christian nation supposedly. And so ⁓ But you know, we we wanted to be able to to come over here and ⁓ pr ⁓ practice our own religion and practice freedom of speech and ride to assemble and and all the different things that the constitution gives us. Now granted, d does ⁓ man pervert things? Yeah. 'Cause I mean, you're a preacher, you know that. I mean, man is a perverse creature and they can take a perfect thing and screw it up really bad. They can take a screwed up thing and make it lot worse. And so I mean, the the the the ability For the human spirit to make everything good on their own without the Lord directing them is just not possible. And that's one thing I think we have seen is that, you know, that the Lord's hand does do a lot of direction and making it better and the lack thereof is the reason why we're in the situation we're in now. speaker-0: I think you hit the bullseye on that. I concur with you a hundred percent in terms of the Lord's hand and the Lord's spirit must be our guiding authority spiritually because we can't logically from a we we have perpetual a lack of authority as men and women. We are imperfective. We are imperfect beings. We are incapable of doing right. ⁓ as we are guided by the righteous spirit of God. And so we need that spirit of God to guide us. But secondly, once we know that that's the the spiritual part of God, the other thing that we have to redeem, you know before we get ri we have to get repentance as a nation, and particularly white Americans have got to realize you did wrong by black Americans. You know, and you have to be young very You have to make straigic moves ⁓ to dis disenable the concept, the evil concept of white supremacy. That starts all other discriminatory things, among other speaker-1: Right, I agree. There should be any yeah. speaker-0: And that is the demonic thinking of whiteness that is in our system in America in every way. You can't get around it until we as a nation embrace that and acknowledge that and then say, we're going to take systemic measure to fix that. I believe that we do have hope. But ign it ignor ignoring it as if like it didn't exist because our feelings get hurt about truth and historically things that are ir irrefutable, that's not gonna help change the situation or the circumstances. I do believe we have the capacity to be better, but we gotta view people and all of us as God children, number one and number two, that there has to be a level of humanity in everything with spouse. If I believe religion is the devil's demonic agency, that he uses to to provide and conquer people. Okay? Because we talked on this show at and other platform shows about how the Catholic Church and and their legal doctrines enabled slavery that classified blacks and Indians as savages to justify the private citizens that before save slavery legalized, it was informally done decades before it was actually legal. Why? Because the Catholic Church sanctioned it. They gave they gave the blessings to it. So I think that before you can get true restoration, I believe repentance, true general repentance is necessary. You know, ⁓ even with God, He wants general repentance. Because if we don't repent for something, that that's not asking God for forgiveness. We have to sincerely repent and and not engage in the same activity. 'Cause if the w if if we just give a lip circuit something, it's not gonna change us or the situation speaker-1: I agree, but I mean ⁓ wh whenever you're addressing the situation, I mean yeah, I mean and I I'm for, you know, basically no supremacy of any race. And so I mean, whenever you have white supremacy and then you replace it with supremacy of a different race or black supremacy or Latino supremacy or Asian supremacy or any type of thing. I mean, basically can't we all kinda like Ronnie King, can't we all just get along? Can't we all just, you know, have everything just be equal and ⁓ not have any supremacy whatsoever? And then Yeah, Then then who's the who's the one who's gonna be judging? I mean, who who's the ⁓ judge and the ⁓ jury of w when is enough repentance and enough change happening? I mean, so s whenever somebody is trying to make amends or or make a difference in in some community, at what level or where is the litmus test of ⁓ of how it needs to be? And so I mean you know, I mean I mean i is it to where you get to the twenty yard line or the thirty yard line or Where's the touchdown at? And so and so b b basically on the measuring stick of morality. How how are you know, wh wh when do I mean, who's the one who judges 'cause a lot of people might think that they're in in their good heart, they they might not have any hate, but they think that they're doing what they can to go ahead and work with every community whatsoever, but from a different point of view, they're not. And so whose point of view is the ⁓ one who's the ⁓ judge and jury of this whole thing? speaker-0: It i it's like yeah, I I I receive that question because I know it comes from our thin place and and the answer simply this is that we a little kid know when they're being treated fairly and they know when they're being treated unfairly. It is a human instinct that knows when you've been treated right and when you've been mistreated. So that's the fun and little thing. And so clearly little kids can understand that adults can. But what what can't do is go into what I call cognitive dissidence where we put in ourselves and pose blockers and we deal we don't want to deal with reality because we offend it so much. We gotta get out of our offenders and start being so offended. And then work at the work of re rehabilitating each other. I agree with you. I don't believe in no there's no such thing as supremacy of any people in a race. That that that that's stupidity. It's it's It's against humanity to to believe that, right? Well but some people do. And if they do that, I disagree with those people that believe it. I I don't believe there's no one no one is greater than the next person. It it's your character is what you do or don't do that determines what you you you you lie. But as far as believing that someone is more superior regardless of your race or ethnicity or whatever, that is that to me. speaker-1: No it is though. No, exactly. speaker-0: is silliness at the highest level. Okay? And so so I I don't I don't believe in that. But but but some people offended because you tell them like what I was just in in my commentary. Some people I know they don't it hurts. Truth hurts sometimes. But in order for you to and do better, you gotta accept truth so that you can then rehabilitate. Self rehabilitate, right? That's all I'm really talking about about, you know. speaker-1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But but but but but a lot of people might self rehabilitate to to their men's or to or to their d or or to their goals. But I you know, if if if I feel like I'm like, you know, doing something to the best of my ability, but the other person over here thinks I'm just, you know, halfway doing it and and partially doing it, then how do I approve to them that I'm doing everything to my best ability? I mean, am I supposed to be are people supposed to be doing their behavior To ⁓ to the whims or to the desires of other people or are they just supposed to be the best person they can be? speaker-0: They they supposed I I I believe that there there needs to be a high authority in my view is is God. Yeah, the biblical authority that leaves it out. 'Cause you know, you can't go to some speaker-1: Well exactly. If you do it that way, then it should be fine then. speaker-0: Yeah. In other words, I believe faith and the biblical principle have an objectivity that tells us how to govern our own individuality as as we deal with our brother and sister. speaker-1: Yeah. So that's because that's because yeah, that's because that's the direction you're coming from. There's a lot of people who are not like you who who are do not come from a direction of faith, who do not come from a direction of the Bible. They come from a direction of anger and hate. And basically they they want to get something out. And that's in every community. That's not just I'm not talking about the black community or the white community or Hispanic. I mean every community has a section of agnostic atheist people who have nothing on their minds But to go ahead and make sure that other people are paying their price or or or or paying their penance for the things that they think they did and they don't have any moral integrity or moral authority whatsoever to to to push it. And so whenever people are trying to do the best of their own in in whatever community they're in, and then they're not being, you know, and and it's kinda like they're like, you know, there there is an equal lane here because, you know, you're coming from a from a big biblical point of view into where God's a judge. Now a lot of people who don't believe in God think that they're the judge. And and and once again, that goes back to the evil tendencies of man. And so it doesn't really matter in my opinion. People can take advantage, and they do, in every race. African Americans, white Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, people who want to go ahead and just show showboat to the other races or other areas because they're they have their own inbred ⁓ discrimination as well. And so and so as much as they think they've been slighted. They want to go ahead and discriminate against the other people and make their s themselves supreme to the other people instead of being equal. Because the equality part is the biblical part that you're talking about, where God's the only judge. Whenever a man takes over that point of being a judge and removes it away from God and takes away from God, then it gets out of control and that's where you get all this here confusion and hate. Well, we all know that devil's the author of confusion. And that's what, you know, I that's what really shepherds all that, in my opinion. speaker-0: I think I think that you said that real eloquently and I agree with everything you're saying. And but you kind of preempted where I was going. The second phrase what I'm saying was that was that that that we have a right for the country to be a atheist or agnostic or whatever you want. And I do believe in legal church separation of church and state. So that being said, that every individual, right, how there is a speaker-1: Yeah, it's a freedom, yeah. speaker-0: a legal this is the law now. There is a objectivity that says that in order to operate and execute in this society we call America, there are rules, laws, and custom and and principles and regulation that as an arrogant we codify that morality in in law. So that's speaker-1: It's kinda like a moral assimilation. speaker-0: Yeah, w whether you call it more or not. But it's still saying that there is an accurate corporate morality that can be changed from generation to generation or from legislature, legislation, or from Supreme Court to Supreme Court. So all that that in terms of law. So thing is that they have we have the law. speaker-1: Yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah. speaker-0: to make an objective sort of aggregate understanding because you can't go to a individual, delusional, idiosyncratic kind of way of thinking because that just we just we can't have that. Because people people are delusional individual. speaker-1: Right. Exactly. But they're s they're very subjective. Right on their own. speaker-0: For example, give you a good good example. There are a lot of people that believe that, okay, driving is a privilege. We have rules that says that if you drive, you have to have insurance. Because if you have insurance and you have an accident and you cause someone injuries, they have to go to hospital. You have to re re reimburse them for their hospital bills, et cetera. So right? Now there's a dream. But then even though they violate the law, but we say in the law you're supposed to have it. So that that makes everybody kind of covered. But you know, people violate the law. But but if you have some people they'll be like, I'm not gonna ever get an erection, therefore I don't need to waste my money buying insurance. Well we're saying that's ridiculous. You can't do that. And we'll suspend your license if we catch you not having insurance. So that's a a simple example where I'm saying that the law sometimes allows us to speaker-1: License. speaker-0: You get our corporate morality. Go ahead. speaker-1: Right. I actually have a question about that example because ⁓ and this is actually a legal question, it might be a little sidebar, but ⁓ whenever I get hit by a person who has no insurance, how come they don't get a ticket? Well I mean they they total they totaled my car and they hit me and they except you a ticket. No they didn't. They didn't get a ticket. This one kid was seventeen years old, he total my car. Another person was ⁓ you know, probably forty five fifty, no insurance. speaker-0: ⁓ having no insurance. speaker-1: Nothing happened to ⁓ that they didn't get cited or anything. And then that it happened a again. And so I mean you know, it's kinda interesting that they tell people you have to have insurance or your license will get suspended and if you get in a car accident, then you know ⁓ you you could you lose your license and blah blah blah. But when it happens to me and somebody hits me and told us my car, then I have insurance. How come nothing happens to them? I have no recourse whatsoever. I can't, you know, it's it's just a stupid question. speaker-0: No, no, ⁓ well no, that's not that's a legitimate question. It does happen. But what I'm saying to you is that first of all, the police should gain side s gate of sight. Well yeah, you should have that lawyer. speaker-1: I should I should call you as my lawyer. speaker-0: Exactly. But you know, but no, but But yeah, th they should've that the the gu the police officer should have gained him a side touch for not and then the judge should've ⁓ fined them for not having speaker-1: And there's no cord. speaker-0: They should have had the license suspended but not having their license. Okay. So so they should got multiple tickets. So the s the system was defective. If if that actually if that happened to you, that that was defective. Yeah. Well that was that was three bad examples of ⁓ and that's statistical anomaly. I and if Tony was here, you'd probably say that's the same thing about your voter for kind of anomaly. speaker-1: Yeah. Yeah, three times. You're right. I AM a statistical anomaly, okay? I live an anomaly type of life, okay? I do. And so I ⁓ granted, I get it. I everybody says it only happens to you and I'm like, p it does. Yeah. speaker-0: You're right. It is for that to happen to you three times. That's like catches a head coming in your back pocket like three times. speaker-1: I've had I've had ⁓ I've had five cars get totaled. It was by fault for two of them. Well three or nine. speaker-0: You know, you can get a new vehicle, you know what I ⁓ mean? speaker-1: It might be one reason why I'm a little crazy. You know what I know what they taste. Gum powder. speaker-0: Let's transition to our current big issue I wanna deal with is that Israel speaker-1: Israel. We're gonna talk about them again? speaker-0: Yes, Israel strike ⁓ a residential home in Gaza. This happened like I think June the twentieth, not too long. But it ⁓ it killed six first of all, they intentionally did this. Wasn't an accidental. They they targeted it. They targeted this home because I believe that there there was interest in one of the Al Jazeera cameramen who they felt like was a terrorist. Anybody that report speaker-1: There is speaker-0: Something negative with Israel, they deem them anti-Semite or terrorists, and they feel like they have a legal right to bomb. So they bombed this residential air area. They killed the little child as well as this journalist. Now, this is this is a international issue, but you won't hear or see it in America because I have to go to the BC to find the kind of information. Because the I go with the BPC. I that's why I tell you, I deal with a lot of international media because This American media can't trust you no more. We don't We don't wanna ⁓ you know speaker-1: I can't trust the international media either, but I mean Yeah, you're right. Sam Donaldson or David Brinkley or speaker-0: Yeah, Break Clean, them kind of people no more. Ed Bradley, who's the best in my opinion. We got entertainment. Yeah, yeah, it's all entertainment. I mean, so we don't have real journals anymore. You know, so we we don't have the air brattings of the world anymore. So but but at the end of the day, so you have to really watch the beach kind of information. So so now the the international community, this is a big deal. Because not only that, but speaker-1: Mike Wallace. No, we don't. It's all entertainment. For it. speaker-0: one of the the the journalists, the cameraman that worked for Al Jazeera that got this happened on June twentieth, not too long ago. Well, his brother also worked for Al Jazeera. They got killed early in this year in April. So clearly Israel was targeting him. And they don't really make a difference that, you know, that they were targeting. But they feel like because of Israel, they can do what they want to do. And so the real issue, Greg, is we as Americans speaker-1: Yeah, that's wrong. speaker-0: And we we to pro the promoters of the First Amendment. And we ⁓ as America regardless political party, we know that in order to be a free nation, it starts with the press. A free press is speaker-1: Yeah, but Israel's not America. Israel's not America. But I agree with you, yeah. I agree with you. speaker-0: But no, but the fun no point I'm making is is that that's not the issue. The issue what I'm trying to say is that we leave in the free press. And so what kind of precedent i ⁓ is that gonna be when you allow any nation to target either the Red Cross or humanitarian or journalists that you you you in order to report the news when real bad things are happening all over the earth, right? You do not want no even the realtories know that the germs are off living because the germs of need to tell your side of a story. speaker-1: Yeah. Right. But I mean i i i if you're gonna start going after every country that goes after journalists, I mean we're gonna be extremely busy. I mean Israel is just one that the the media wants to talk about 'cause they hate Israel. I mean, but you got lots of countries that do this. I mean lots of I mean I'm sure I I could probably come up with a list by the next show. Well speaker-0: ⁓ you come over there and live by the next show. I mean, yeah, there are times when that speaker-1: I do that. ⁓ If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. That's fine, I mean, but you know speaker-0: But usually Greg, that's like a accidental thing. Very few times that we see an intentional thing. And and it's always a consequence as whether or not they take ownership button. The difference speaker-1: Russia and Russia, Ukraine, China, North Korea, South Korea, I mean all this in Indonesia, I mean ⁓ Saudi Arabia. I they they find ways here silencing the media, controlling the media, or sh or shutting them down or eliminating or killing them. ⁓ yeah, definitely. America America is the only country. America is the only nation. That is actually another reason for the independence ⁓ celebration. Not very many reasons, but one of the good ones. speaker-0: ⁓ well. speaker-1: Is the only nation that we can actually do this show without us. I mean, if we did this show in England or France, we'd be arrested after the first episode or second episode. speaker-0: free. But what I'm saying is that we as Americans usually are the leaders of the free press and whether or anybody out of the driveway. But this is the difference though, Greg, is that speaker-1: Yeah, we shouldn't endorse it at all. We shouldn't condone it. speaker-0: Even pumpkin, Greg, has he put a he put it in a me you know, he has a their their w what what a KGB, their their actually he grew up in that kind of that that's his main forte for getting a rush. Cobra to that that's how he got his child. But so what I'm saying, so he knows he know how to at least create plausible ⁓ deniability. That's a difference here. In this situation, speaker-1: Cool. Yeah. speaker-0: Israel controlled God's and the whole territory over there. So therefore we know who did it. There there's there's no ambiguity. We know this and and his intention. That's a factual d distinction that I'm trying to. speaker-1: And and I agree with you. I mean, we should not be condoning any type of military action on a journalist. Now however, that being said, there are some journalists who might be spies or soldiers and and if they are, then that's really takes them away from the journalist cloak. And if they're actually doing things against the state and d doing using spy information or or deep state information, that is that kind of violates your whole journalistic ⁓ integrity there and you're quite journalistic ⁓ protection. But if they're not doing that and if they have no proof of them doing that, then they shouldn't be just killing speaker-0: Right, there's no proof of that. I and I agree I agree with you the principle that could be the case. And there's sometimes that I don't even think Israel even putting up that argument yet. So don't put forth that argument. speaker-1: It is fine. No, I doubt it. We I mean the the only reason you bomb my house for neighborhood is that's where the terrorists live and everything else. And so you it but you I we are in twenty twenty six, we are smart enough strategically to know their footprints and how many when they leave the house. I mean, they have satellites everywhere and know where all these guys are. So the whole fact that you're the whole fact that anybody here is bombing things accidentally with all the technology and the intelligence that we do have access to legitimately. Now if you want to go off and use fake intelligence or or fake data, then you know, you're gonna get what you get. And that's the ⁓ repercussions that we're seeing. And that's horrible. But and and that's but like I said, that's with every every nation's ⁓ military state is that whenever you have bad data, you have bad decisions. And so if they had the proper intel to actually do it properly, then we wouldn't be in this situation we wanna have this conversation. Unless They're just trying to target the media, which is wrong because the media should be free anywhere. And as much as I promote it very strongly here as American principle, it should be a world principle. I mean, I have a background in journalism and so do you before you became a lawyer and officer of the court. And so that being said, we understand the the importance of, you know, of putting the information out there and letting people, you know, transparency is necessary, letting people see the points and see the facts and see the both sides of the story, not just one side as CNN or MSNBC just wants to tell their side or Fox News or One American News just wants to tell their side. And the Blazes actually I I'm a kind of a Blaze fan. They're kinda middle of the road. I mean they they they tell both sides. I mean they're a little more tilted right wing. But I mean, but the thing is, I mean a lot of these media outlets will only and that's the reason why I get so irritated with everybody talking about the polls and what people are saying about America and and and and not everybody's objects of America and that's reason why I get upset with my conservative friends who start judging people personally mor more morally judging liberals and my liberal friends for morally judging conservatives. Unless you sit down and break bread with these people, unless you are g in their house and are in their mind, you have no idea what's going on really. You only know through the lens of what the media wants you to know through that lens. That's it. And so whenever people say Trump is a Hitler or Biden's a idiot or Hunter's a well, actually Hunter is a cokehead. I mean he's on video doing that. But you know, I mean, but but but but but but Hunter's problems and everything else. Well whenever you talk about all the different issues and all the stereotypes and all this all the hasty generalizations about these ⁓ public profile people, as if you know them. I mean, I know we live in a tabloid society, but not all tabloids are true. Not all not all gossip at you. Now it might sound good and it might enhance your argument because you hate somebody or enhance your argument because you love somebody. But the reality is, you know, is it once you go meet the person and look in their eye and look in their soul. And and we most of us still never have that opportunity to do that. We're never gonna have that opportunity. So we rely on a media that's biased. Or rely on the news that's biased. But that being said, you should not be killing the media. You don't kill journalists. You just don't do that. It's kinda like when ⁓ American gangster, ⁓ the the the mother tells Denzel Washington, one thing you don't kill cops. You don't shoot cops. That's one thing. You can do a lot of crazy things and a lot of stupid stuff, but you don't shoot cops. And you don't shoot journalists, period. Or killers. speaker-0: And I I agree. And I think that a lot see, one thing, Greg, people don't realize is that it's easy as to sit at home and be a couch potato social media and just you know. Yeah. You know, and then it's good to be it is easy to be what I call, you know, ⁓ a a keypad banger. You bag on a computer keypad. speaker-1: Is there a quarterback? That's a good one. Keep out bandit. Perfect. speaker-0: You know, so it's it's easy to build keypad bandit and you know, you're tough and rough, you know, you sitting on your keyboard and you you know, you all that. But y you know, but when you meet someone face to face, what would you really do? The changes the point I'm trying to make here is that is that I the whole point of this show and ⁓ of Key New Revelation and all the shows we're on our own platform we're on, is to get people to use their brain to think. So I get your brain to think. And for you to think, not for you to be a nest for let someone be all do all your thinking. A pastor in a normal preacher should not do all your thinking for you. Your employer, your your friends, your mom, your dad, your co-workers should not be thinking for you. speaker-1: Right, exactly. Exactly. You should not be a exactly. You should not be a non-critical thinker. You should be a critical thinker. You should strategically think about everything. I think like I heard today ⁓ my ⁓ partner here, she told me that they're bringing cursive back to schools. And I think ⁓ the cursive handwriting is a good thing to bring back to schools here in Florida. Not because it's it's readable or not because it's legible, but what it allows you to do and what it encourages you to do is pay attention to detail. to points that you were not paying attention to detail before because we have so many people who are keystroking and thumbing and typing. And I'm a great typist, my handwriting is horrible, but I can write cursor pretty good. But you know, I mean ⁓ but in order to do that properly in and the penmanship, you know, it gets your mind going in a different motor skill and it gets you you thinking a lot differently and and that's one thing that's needed. speaker-0: Yeah, I agree that. I think that these kids today was graduate and I'm like, How do you sign your check? They don't know you know, when you work at these little minimum wage jobs or whatever, like how can you I I don't know what they do. ⁓ you know, 'cause you know, I was younger, we had to sign checks and things of that nature, you know, so we can ⁓ you know, deposit our checks and knowing, you know, how to do it personally. I think that's a good thing and speaker-1: Yeah it's not with an X. speaker-0: Yeah. Yeah. Well well yeah. Well those were people who it was the was the illiterate that had to sign with the X. I knew elderly people when I grew up in I Franch Cole that that wasn't able to get education at all. And they have to sign with an X, but but speaker-1: I don't think it really has to do with education. I think it has to do with elderly people. My dad was extremely educated and he's a professor, but once he hit eighty years old, he couldn't sign a signature anymore. He signed with a splash and that was it. I mean there's a part to once you get that age, your your your structure of your hand holding the pen is just not there for a lot of people. I'm not saying that for everybody, but ⁓ regardless of your education. speaker-0: Yeah, we yeah, exactly. That's another issue. You get a certain age and you tremble and you know, ⁓ you have to authorized and stuff, you just do it and so Yeah, but that works though, you know, but ⁓ in advance. Let's let's transition, Greg, to the next issue I want to deal with. And that is the Ebola outbreak that's happening right now. And again, I follow off on some stuff because America is ⁓ is too busy with it. foolishness in the media and they're not being real issues. And so but let me let me just lay the foundation of what's really going on. Now I I believe it in in in the Congo was a national declaration between on May eighteenth of this year regarding the Ebola ⁓ breakout. And the breakdown is that I believe it's like four hundred and thirty eight people have died. You wouldn't know that speaker-1: We are. speaker-0: in in the in the in the regular media because they're they they they too busy focusing on on ⁓ on on foolish stuff. So you have four hundred and thirty eight there, fourteen hundred and six confirmed cases as of July second of of this year, since May the seventeenth or eighteenth, so to speak. So that's a lot of people have died between the Congo and Uganda in Africa. Now th there is no urgency at this point whether or not that will spread ⁓ not but you don't know because if people are traveling doing business it's pa is potential. But they're saying that the the the the the rate ⁓ is low but who knows if you do a business in after you travel there i it there's always a possibility. But ⁓ but but the fact but then there was another case where I I think either France or some somewhere in Europe a couple of days ago, a few days ago before my on my official trip last week, I think it happened. speaker-1: Yeah, you don't know. speaker-0: where someone in Europe had got Eboba there. I went on my trip and so I I didn't hear no more about that my fishing trip. So so it is starting to in at least one case within the UR as well as, you know, in in Africa. But the the thing is is that we still have to have a humanity about us. And one of the concerns while I'm bringing this subject up is that we in America has cut speaker-1: Right. Yeah. speaker-0: a lot of phones and I'm gonna tell you something. The best thing that George W. Bush did or W did was the AIDS fight or in Africa. I think I I gave him A ⁓ A plus on that and I gave him prior F's and D's on everything else he did. But on that, he did a a a jammed up A according to my report called he did a ⁓ A plus job on that. Not just while he was president, but after his presidency, ⁓ his transition, his travel and and things like that. ⁓ so I think that's a good thing. But we are cutting this administration cutting a lot of ⁓ you know, aid with we're taking it frivolous to the World Health Organization, things like that. It's we we invest in other continents and other countries because we don't really believe in isolation because like When you need war, when you need certain things outside of your country for the trade product, you wanna have some type of relationship with a a foreign nation so that you can have trade, you can have rationality of good business. But when you have this economic isolation, military isolation, you're all by yourself and at some point you you perish by being isolated. So I think the cuts that we've been doing with you know, g ⁓ not finding these health organizations internationally, these are situations where eventually outbreaks will come back and be over here. That can cause death to to American citizens at some point. So Africa is a big continent that has a a lot of potential now. And you're seeing a Russia and China is all in Africa trying to do this and do that and get business and things of that nature. So You know, America has gotta get together and start, you know, defaming and calling names to to these countries so that they do fit this way. I ⁓ speaker-1: Yeah. I understand your point of view there. I mean, I think a lot of it has to do with there is and and there always w has been and there probably always will be, there is a sense and there is a tendency to have corruption where you have that much money going through a lot of these agencies. And so a lot of it is them trying to put a band aid on a big wound and probably they're putting the band aid in the wrong spot. And so I mean I mean, I think if you're gonna give money to the World Health Organization, the money should come with a lot of people looking at how the money's being spent and not how it's, you know, being ⁓ misused or misappropriated. And it should be spent and and I'm not saying it is. I'm just saying that that the ability should be there whenever you're you know, whenever you're giving your your kids some money, you wanna know how they're spending it. Whenever you give anybody money, you wanna know how it's being used. And so and so just to get You and I've talked about giving blanket checks and these open checks to all these nations and and how s ridiculous and how stupid that is. It goes the same way with a lot a lot of these international organizations which a lot of them don't even like America. And so they're just basically looking at America just to go ahead and take our money and find ways to go ahead and and not do anything to support us or help us medically or socially in within their bylaws or their structure. But that being said, you know, it's interesting that we're cutting Stuff about health, but we're not cutting money to Saudi or to Bahrain or to Kuwait or to Indonesia or to Russia or to China or to South Korea, North Korea, Ukraine, France, England, pick a country. You know, I mean we we we we we keep on cutting stuff that benefits humanity and we're not cutting the things that hurt humanity. And so I mean but then again, I'm not privy to a lot of information. I'm just ⁓ I'm an armchair quarterback here sitting in a little chair here in Poncos, Florida. So I don't have all the details and I I'm I'm okay with saying I'm ignorant to that fact and and most people are ignorant to that fact because we are not privy to the reasons why they're making the decision. We we might think they're wrong and we might think they're right. But we don't really know because we haven't sat down and li read all the different laws and we haven't followed the money. And so speaker-0: Yeah, I I do believe in ⁓ economic verification and follow up just like with a bank, just like with your children, you know, you example. You want to be know that your funds are going to what you question them to be. So they're not wasted. And I agree, I agree with that a hundred percent. At the same time in Congo we see speaker-1: Right. Exactly. Exactly to the warlord. speaker-0: The gangsters to the gangsters that can the old territory that everybody's benefiting get wealthy from. So speaker-1: Yeah, and so and the whole thing with Ebola is that until it hits ten thousand people, nobody gives a darn. speaker-0: Exactly. And that's my point. speaker-1: Until it hits a critical number. speaker-0: Right, right, right. We and this is actually my quote why I'm bringing this up, because until they get you to that ten thousand number, the whole world's gonna ignore it. You know, then it's gonna be too late, you know. speaker-1: I ignored it. Yeah, number two. I mean, I we don't really know what the number is gonna be, especially with it being Congo and Africa and the the lack of the media as attention to it and and you know, the American media, the international media and all the media is just ridiculously pathetic as far as can't covering those kind of stories, which I being be me being a journalist and even me being a conservative Republican, I was always interested in stories that had to do with famine or disease or stuff like that and talking to people who either A suffered from it or B came through it or or or telling the stories and and finding out the solutions and and and how to make sure it does not happen again and all the different I mean you have I mean first of all from a purely journalistic point of view, you got a lot of gold there. I mean you you have some really incredible stories and and not just because it's really good to promote the issue, but it's just good journalism. It's good it's good storytelling. I mean it's an incredible story. And at the same time it needs to be told because people need to know the suffering is happening in Congo or in Zimbabwe or in ⁓ Uruguay or Uganda or Brazil or South America or Argentina or Chile or you know, you know, ⁓ all these different nations all around the world. We see so much of this ha stuff happening, they're worried about Trump in a ballroom, or they're worried about Trump and his crypto, or they're worried about, you know, Schumer in one of his stupid comments, or they're worried about Nancy Pelosi's husband. getting hit in the head with something or they're worried about AOC running against Schumer or Crockett losing or DSA winning or Democrats losing or I mean they they worry about all the political appetite and they worry about the the job numbers being down and so on and so forth, but they're not really worried about the stories that affect humanity. ⁓ Because it we we it it's not sexy but it really is. speaker-0: It's It's entertainment dis you know, disguised as drunk. speaker-1: entertainment though. It's good entertainment though. I mean, that's the whole thing. I mean talking about, you know, and that not not to make light of the what's going on, but it's extremely interesting about people who are dying from a disease because their their the money is being given to the nation and they're using it for other greed or other hedonistic tendencies instead of taking care of their own people. That's a heck of a story. speaker-0: Yes, in in so many different directions. But if no one's talking about it, two things gonna happen. One, the numbers and the death is eventually gonna increase and two, if there is some level of corruption, the the money's gonna be spent out before you can figure out where win. And so you're gonna yeah, so you're gonna be money money quarterbacking as to what happened to those phones if they were allocated. speaker-1: ⁓ yeah. ⁓ speaker-0: So I I do believe there gotta be a a a level of measuring a and and and and and all that. But but the but intriguing thing to me is that the same condo congo where there's all kind of wealth of natural resources, that everybody in every region is equal opportunity, demonic thieves of their wealth there. And nobody have no problem with that. speaker-1: Diamonds. speaker-0: control everything ⁓ from the actual people who need that help. But you name it Russia, China, America, ⁓ Duba, you name everybody's there doing wrong. It is the one area in the Congo where everybody's doing wrong, stealing the wealth of the people of the Congo. And you have all these history of now you got good leaders that's coming in in different parts of Africa now and things like that. But but again, it's amazing me how we cannot put a a journalism ⁓ tension on things that have a humanitarian kind of impact, right? But yeah speaker-1: But it goes full circle back to what we talked about at the beginning of the show. It talks about human nature and evil tendencies of whenever you have people who are only doing their own personal agenda instead of the agenda an objective agenda. And so when you have a subjective agenda, and you and I both know most of the media is controlled by the ⁓ advertisers and and the people who are paying for the ads for the media to run. And so and so basically whenever you have the top half percent controlling all the outlets and Whether it be liberal, conservative or middle of the road, they're all being controlled by the top half percent or maybe top quarter percent. And and so if they don't want that story told, it's not gonna be told. speaker-0: Right, right, right. Yeah. I think we'll put a a a book on that topic and let's transition to our next topic. July this July 1st here represent ⁓ 350 people, Haitian national people has the risk of being deported based upon the Supreme Court recent decision that no one really talking about. They made some very big decisions w regarding t term termination of ⁓ what called TP as was his temporary protection status. That's like 350 Haitian ⁓ nationals that has the the the the the potentiality of being disported ⁓ deported. Now one of the things that that's that I think that's concerning is is that the Supreme Court allowed did a few things. Number one, they bar judicial review, which is amazing and very extreme to bar judicial review. And for those out there th to make this understanding and not be too legalistic, judicial view is when a judge or court can you can go petition a court to for redress saying that something was done to me. Well what the what scholars basically did was they cut off the federal courts by saying that no, you can't even go and review to federal court the Homeland Security Act. So as if like whatever Homeland Security says is good golden gospel, which is absolutely insane from just just procedure-wise. That's the first one. Number two, it's vacated all the law core injunctions that said that we it we're gonna join you ⁓ Homeland Security. Injunction means to stop or refrain me from doing something. Meaning That all the war courts that have said to the Holand Security, there's a problem with that, there's a legal problem with that, there's defective to that. So we we stopped in that order. Then the third thing, Greg, was they rejected all blanket discrimination claims, which means that if a person can prove that they're being discriminated against, then they can all go back to federal court and have their day in court. It's called due process. Now that's the three elements. But also you talk about many of these people have homes, jobs, mortgages, car loans. So the financial burden from employees just if you deport these people, y again, it's three hundred and fifty thousand people. You know, in fact it's gonna affect the economy, but you got a hostility for this administration, racially biased hostility toward Haitians and people, black people, people of color, they shut down books and they ban And it they just basically trying to get rid of all black sound government and now I'm trying to Haitian. So my thing is is that is that what I mean, this is a really big deal, but once again, just like the Ebola operate, because it affects African ⁓ people of black ⁓ pigmentation, no one really talking about this. speaker-1: Now he's is it three hundred and fifty thousand or three hundred and fifty? speaker-0: Three hundred and fifty thousand people. Three hundred and fifty thousand people. Which you know, again, that's speaker-1: Yeah, I got I got quite a few Haitian friends myself, so speaker-0: Yeah, w and I don't ⁓ again this this a it's called i you may hear it's referred to a TP, you know, TPT, you know, TP temporary protection status, TPS, you know, and that's basically what they call it, but it it's the formal name the Temporary Protection Status. And that's been a status to give people ⁓ that's legally here in this country. And if you try to deport them, there's then you can go to federal court to make speaker-1: Right, yeah. speaker-0: claims why they have the legal right to stay there. And what the court did was eliminate all that. Just just just just blew up their procedural due process kind of things, which is very extreme. ⁓ and and that's kind of a pattern here. But I think that's very concerning to the to things like that. There I mean all these people have well, I would say all of us, I don't I don't think they have any issues for following the law and doing what they're supposed to do. It's just it's a matter of speaker-1: Well, it is that way. speaker-0: a discretionary thing where you just kinda say, Okay, you you got to go 'cause you hates you. And that's a problem. That's a real good racially hostility towards his administration. I mean they made it very clear with some of the statements. speaker-1: I mean i if if the Haitian ⁓ people are here legally and they're here on their that status and everything else, I mean I don't know exactly what the rules are. Do they know that they can be they can be terminated at any time without any kind of notice, or is there like a due notice, or is there like a ninety day notice, or or how is it working where they have the TPS? And and that being said, I mean, how hard is it for them to go ahead and take that w next step further to become a citizen? speaker-0: Well well yeah. ⁓ there there's there's a there'll come with a process, I don't do the immigration process, but I know basically that the the real due process aspect of it that you normally if there's a defect and and the government saying you have to leave, they have to give you call, right? A basic justified. Then if you disagree with that, you can then normally typically go to federal court and have have that adjudicated in court and you can't be deported until the the the immigration judge or federal court tells you no that you lost or you won. So so in other words the due process now is being eliminated. That's a big deal what I'm trying to say. That's a very big deal. Yeah. So but yeah, but that that's kind of one of the one of the ⁓ very big deals. And I think that I I my heart and my prayers goes out to the Haitian people affected by this I I I just don't know. Yeah, I just don't like the fact that Supreme Court. We have a bad legal system with all this defects there is. And I do believe that they should have a right to have lead due process. And they shouldn't go on the administrative who have shown incompetence, number one. And racial hostility who, you know, i i in that homeland security deal. speaker-1: mine do as well. They should, yeah. speaker-0: This guy was trying to beat people up in a public hearing. I mean, so I that's the problem, the credibility of the people who's saying that you gotta go and your history, your record in public display, doing hearing, doing even confirmation hearing. You you're trying to almost literally pick a fight with people, with the comedy people who oversee you for the job. So this this ridiculous you can't make this level crazy. crazy. leave this is I mean, I don't know. I don't know, man. The stuff that we see in America just is like it's just it's just beyond it's it's just speechless. It's just ridiculous. You know, but anyway, ⁓ but that that I'll put a board at top for right now. We can deal with that in in the future. But the final the final section I want to deal with what we call our party section, which is the speaker-1: It makes you speechless. speaker-0: the power of God is and it's very simple. Greg, today former Realm cornerback in the nineteen eighties, all pro ⁓ Irving, was a fantastic football player for the Los Angeles Real. He was a great player in the nineteen eighties and unfortunately he died today at at the age of sixty eight. And ⁓ so my prayers go out to his family and the Realms nation. I'm on paper still a fanatic fan of but ⁓ I'm a sports fan. And and for the loss of a great athlete and ⁓ it was he was a joy ⁓ to watch ⁓ in the nineteen eighties and so prayers are up for Leroy Irving and his family and the Rams Nation that you deal with ⁓ this loss because ⁓ you know one thing about a sports fan is that y you lose a sports fan or enter entertainer great And we know better as Christians that we we love the Lord and we don't get too much into idolatry of worship. But y you're you can't admire people for before and these ⁓ these athletes. It's just something about ⁓ that ⁓ you know, special guys that you you know, the athlete is just it's like part of your family, you know. You it is better than you know, you never meet physically meet some of ⁓ but, you know, just have a own that it it's not even logical. speaker-1: I get it. I mean, I grew up in a family like that. My mom was actually the tutor for the ⁓ Florida Gator football team and and ⁓ a lot of the players who are in different majors and she helped them with ⁓ making sure that they stayed on the field and in order to do that they had to keep their GPA above two point eight. And so sh sh she helped them out with that quite a bit and so I mean I got blessed and ⁓ too to to grow up around these players coming to our house and eating my cereal and stuff like that and and so I mean it was ⁓ I was only like six, seven years old and I actually have ran into a few of them like forty years later. They have no idea who I am. I get it. You know, I was seven years old, six years old. And they probably don't remember my mom either. And also that being said, though a lot of them have the ⁓ CTE issues, so a lot of them don't remember too much at all from Wow way back in the eighties. And so that that's sad, but that's the that's the downside to the ⁓ aging athletes is ⁓ all the concussions and all the damage that they put their bodies through and everything else just for the entertainment. of people like us to watch and not to watch like idols, but just watch like part of the family growing up. I mean, I you know, I grew up where Emma Smith grew up and so I knew a lot of the of the family and everything, and Roy Jones Jr. as well. And and that's the kind of people that I grew up with whenever I, you know, moved from Gainesville over to Pensacola. And so we we we have a history of being around sports athletes and cultural athlete. We had Justin Gatland as a track player, a track star. And Reggie Evans is a basketball player and and those kind of guys over there. And so I mean, you know, and and ⁓ you know, we ⁓ quite a few other football players, Josh Sitton and and ⁓ and so I mean you know, being around that and I've been fortunate enough to to be around or meet a lot of these individuals or if I haven't met them individually, I got to meet their their families and and work with them in different non profit organizations or political organizations or stuff like that. And so I've been blessed like that, but you know, a lot of people haven't. And whenever somebody passes away like, you know, who you followed for years, it's just really sad. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well I mean my heart goes out to the family, definitely. speaker-0: But that's gonna be a wrap for this show. And ⁓ again, ⁓ we wanna thank everybody for watching and tuning in. ⁓ again, we can we can agree to disagree. ⁓ like, share, and follow us again. Yeah, this show is is about people, the people, the real people, real talk, real issue, ⁓ real revelation, Kino revelations so that we can influence each other and sharpen each other to be better. You know, and I wanna ask you. speaker-1: Definitely. speaker-0: Just a walking power. And I want to thank Greg ⁓ for being here ⁓ w with us tonight. And God bless you. God bless your families and and walking power and ⁓ good night and always rock on. Thank you, Greg, for being with us. speaker-1: Th and thank you Charles for having me on the show tonight. God bless. Y'all be careful this Fourth of July weekend. Don't drink and drive. Yeah. Be careful. speaker-0: Right. God bless. Good night everyone. Be safe.