Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Dems Rise to a Level of Absurdity on Judicial Nominees

Transcript

Dems Rise to a Level of Absurdity on Judicial Nominees · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Radical nominees is what the Biden administration is going for
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: right now when it comes to court vacancies. They have
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: gone to a level of absurdity that I don't think
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: any of us could have imagined coming from Joe Biden.
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: So why is it happening now? Because they are having
• 0:18
  Speaker 1: to signal to the younger voters and the Democratic Marxist
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: Communist Party that they're willing to put in the most
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: egregious abusers of personal their personal beliefs over what the
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: law is actually saying. Let me give you an example
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: of this. Right now, Joe Biden has a nominee to
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: be the judge for the Southern District of New York.
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: So we're talking about the radical AOC world, the world
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: that's going after Donald Trump right now, the Alvin Bragg
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: people right of New York City. Her name is Sarah
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: Netburn and she puts ideology before everything when she is
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: on the bench. How do we know this, Well, she
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: put ideology before women's safety when it came to housing
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: a biological man, a six foot two man with a
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: penis in a woman's prison who was a sex offender,
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: a rapist.
• 1:13
  Speaker 2: And she knew this when the Bureau of Prisons.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: Warned this radical judge against housing not just a convicted
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: serial rapist, but a convicted serial child rapist who's six
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: 's two with a penis, who identifies a.
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: Woman in a woman's prison.
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: This judge, Sarah Netburn, disregarded the recommendation from the Bureau
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: of Prisons and housed the serial child rapists with women anyway. Now,
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: let me also tell you that she is up for
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: confirmation and Senator Ted Cruz got to ask her questions
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: about this decision.
• 1:57
  Speaker 2: I want you to hear what she says. But what
• 2:00
  Speaker 2: we've also.
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: Learned about this nominee is that this nominee also green
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: lit the secret search of journalists emails over the Ashley
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: Biden diary scandal, which I told you about yesterday. I'm
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: going to have that part of the story in a moment,
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: but first I want you to hear senter Ted Kruz
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: at her nomination or confirmation hearing. This is the judge
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: Sarah Netburn looking to get a big job in New York.
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: Take a listen, well, Judge Thattburn.
• 2:32
  Speaker 3: I want to continue on this line of questioning.
• 2:36
  Speaker 4: In your court. What matters more the rights of individuals
• 2:40
  Speaker 4: or your political ideology.
• 2:43
  Speaker 3: I apply the law to the facts.
• 2:45
  Speaker 4: I asked a question, which matters more?
• 2:48
  Speaker 5: Well, my political ideology doesn't matter at all, Okay.
• 2:51
  Speaker 4: So I don't believe you, and I think this case
• 2:53
  Speaker 4: demonstrates that you are willing to subjugate the rights of
• 2:58
  Speaker 4: individuals to satisfy your political ideology. This case involves a
• 3:05
  Speaker 4: male defendant who raped a nine year old boy. Was
• 3:10
  Speaker 4: he guilty of that?
• 3:12
  Speaker 3: Yes, the petitioner pled guilty to that.
• 3:13
  Speaker 4: Okay, So he raped a nine year old boy. He
• 3:15
  Speaker 4: also raped a seventeen year old girl. Was he guilty
• 3:18
  Speaker 4: of that?
• 3:19
  Speaker 3: He pled guilty. The petitioner pled guilty at that crime
• 3:21
  Speaker 3: as well.
• 3:22
  Speaker 4: So was he guilty?
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: I hope so, because she pled guilty to it.
• 3:27
  Speaker 4: He was a he when he did this, that's correct,
• 3:30
  Speaker 4: and also criminal deviant conduct, which the record doesn't disclose
• 3:35
  Speaker 4: what that was exactly. Then, after serving in prison, mister
• 3:40
  Speaker 4: McLain was released for parole, but then violated the terms
• 3:43
  Speaker 4: of parole by having Internet and was sent back to prison.
• 3:46
  Speaker 4: One year after being released again, he was convicted of
• 3:48
  Speaker 4: having child pornography. Is that correct?
• 3:51
  Speaker 5: I'm unclear on exactly the timeframe that you're at but
• 3:54
  Speaker 5: the petitioner was convicted of distributing child pornography.
• 3:57
  Speaker 4: Child pornography that was images of adult violently.
• 4:00
  Speaker 5: Raping children, abhorrent conduct, okay, for which there are real victims.
• 4:06
  Speaker 4: And this individual six foot two biologically a man. A
• 4:11
  Speaker 4: minute ago you said that when this man decided that
• 4:16
  Speaker 4: he was a she, you said, this individual was quote
• 4:19
  Speaker 4: I wrote it down, sober and entirely a female. That
• 4:24
  Speaker 4: phrase struck me as remarkable. Did this individual have male genitalia?
• 4:29
  Speaker 3: I think what I said, or at least that is.
• 4:31
  Speaker 4: A verbatim quote entirely a female?
• 4:33
  Speaker 3: Sorry, what I meant to say was hormonally a female.
• 4:36
  Speaker 4: Okay, but that's not entirely. Did this individual have male genitalia?
• 4:41
  Speaker 3: Yes?
• 4:42
  Speaker 4: So you took a six foot two serial rapist, serial
• 4:48
  Speaker 4: child rapist with male genitalia, and he said, you know,
• 4:54
  Speaker 4: I'd like to be in a women's prison, and your
• 4:56
  Speaker 4: answer was that sounds great to me. Let me ask
• 4:59
  Speaker 4: you something. The other women in that prison do they
• 5:01
  Speaker 4: have any rights?
• 5:03
  Speaker 3: Is that a question?
• 5:03
  Speaker 4: Yes, the other women in that prison do they have
• 5:05
  Speaker 4: any rights?
• 5:06
  Speaker 3: Of course, do.
• 5:07
  Speaker 4: They have the right not to have a six foot
• 5:10
  Speaker 4: two man who is a repeat serial rapist put in
• 5:13
  Speaker 4: as their cellmate.
• 5:15
  Speaker 5: Senator Cruz, I considered the facts presented to me, and
• 5:19
  Speaker 5: I reached a decision.
• 5:20
  Speaker 4: I asked you a question a lot. I asked you
• 5:21
  Speaker 4: a question. Do they have a right not to have
• 5:24
  Speaker 4: a six foot two man who is a serial rapist
• 5:28
  Speaker 4: put in as their cellmate? Do those women have a
• 5:30
  Speaker 4: right to that.
• 5:31
  Speaker 5: Every person who's incarcerated has the right to be safe
• 5:35
  Speaker 5: in their space.
• 5:35
  Speaker 4: But you didn't think so. You didn't think so. And
• 5:39
  Speaker 4: in fact, I'm gonna give some quotes from your order
• 5:41
  Speaker 4: because Senator Kennedy is right. This is not a judge's order.
• 5:45
  Speaker 4: This is a political activist. By the way, the beginning
• 5:48
  Speaker 4: of your order says, at birth, people are typically assigned
• 5:54
  Speaker 4: a gender. I got to say that would astonish a
• 5:56
  Speaker 4: lot of Americans. A lot of Americans think, you go
• 5:59
  Speaker 4: to the hospital, baby is born, and congratulations, you have
• 6:02
  Speaker 4: a little boy a little girl the assigned agender. I
• 6:05
  Speaker 4: know you went to Brown, but it sounds like it's
• 6:07
  Speaker 4: in a college faculty lounge with no bearing on reality.
• 6:12
  Speaker 4: The Bureau of Prison argued what I'm saying right now
• 6:15
  Speaker 4: that if you put this person in a female prison,
• 6:18
  Speaker 4: there will be a risk of sexual assault to the women,
• 6:20
  Speaker 4: and you know what you did. You said you didn't
• 6:23
  Speaker 4: care about the women. I'm gonna quote what you wrote.
• 6:25
  Speaker 4: You wrote quote the Bureau Prisons claim penelogical interest in
• 6:28
  Speaker 4: protecting female prisoners from sexual violence and trauma. This interest
• 6:33
  Speaker 4: is legitimate, that's kind of you to say. But there
• 6:35
  Speaker 4: are no signs that petitioner is at risk of reoffending.
• 6:39
  Speaker 4: The record is devoid of evidence of incidents of violence
• 6:41
  Speaker 4: or assault during petitioners incarceration when she was the perpetrator,
• 6:45
  Speaker 4: only the victim. A theoretical risk of sexual assault by
• 6:48
  Speaker 4: the prisoner without more cannot support the BOPCE position. No
• 6:52
  Speaker 4: evidence theoretical have you dealt in what universe is someone
• 6:58
  Speaker 4: who is a serial, reap, repeat child rapist not at
• 7:03
  Speaker 4: a risk of reoffending?
• 7:04
  Speaker 3: Senator? As I do in every case.
• 7:06
  Speaker 4: Okay, I know you've been told to repeat the line.
• 7:08
  Speaker 4: I followed the law. I asked a question, in what
• 7:12
  Speaker 4: universe is someone who is a serial, repeat child rapist
• 7:17
  Speaker 4: not at risk of reoffending?
• 7:19
  Speaker 3: Sir?
• 7:19
  Speaker 5: I looked at the facts that were before me in
• 7:22
  Speaker 5: this case, all of the evidence, including the statements of
• 7:26
  Speaker 5: every warden who had supervised this.
• 7:28
  Speaker 4: Petition, you also wrote. The BOP also posits the permitting
• 7:31
  Speaker 4: petitioner to live among women will be traumatizing and possibly
• 7:34
  Speaker 4: dangerous to them. This concern is overblown. I have to say,
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: if I were the father of one of those women,
• 7:44
  Speaker 4: and you decided that my daughter's cellmate was going to
• 7:48
  Speaker 4: be a six foot two man who over and over
• 7:50
  Speaker 4: and over again committed violent sexual assault, I would say
• 7:54
  Speaker 4: the entire justice system is absurd, and it is clear
• 7:58
  Speaker 4: on your record your pulletical ideology matters a heck of
• 8:01
  Speaker 4: a lot more than the rights of those women that
• 8:04
  Speaker 4: you endangered. I think you're a radical, and I think
• 8:07
  Speaker 4: you have no business being a judge.
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: Senator Cruz is right, by the way, this is a
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: radical extremist who should not be on any court, not
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: because she's a leftist, but because she doesn't actually apply
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: the law or respect the law. You got to understand,
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: I don't care if you're a Republican or Democrat, as
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: long as when you were a judged, you are honest
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: as a judge.
• 8:29
  Speaker 2: That's number one for me.
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: Okay, if you are honest as a judge, then I
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: can move forward with you. I can respect you. I
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: can sit there and say that you are someone that
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: will look at the law and then decide on the law.
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: But this woman doesn't do that. She never does that.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: She puts a radical extremists agenda ahead of safety and
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: the security of the people. And that's not all this
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: Biden nominee, a few years before she was nominated by
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden to a lifetime judicial appointment, signed off on
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: an order that compelled Google to secretly hand over to
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: criminal investigators information from the email account of the journalist
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: who had obtained Ashley Biden's diary. Netburn was eviscerated by
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: Republican centers, not just Cruise, but Kennedy and others for
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: her partisanship during her confirmation hearings this week, allowing the
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: repeat sexual offender to be housed in a female prison
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: because he said she was a He was a woman.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: That's all it took. And she's like, yep, I'm all
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: on board. I'm totally fine with that. We've also learned
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: now that prior to her being nominated, maybe this is
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: what actually got her a job, or got her the nomination,
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: is the fact that Judge Netburn, as a federal magistrate
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: judge in New York, signed the order compelling Google to
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: provide information from a Project Veritas journalist personal email account.
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: Court records now show Project Veritas James O'Keefe's organization that's
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: now defunct but had been around forever. He's still doing
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: his undercover journalism under his own name. But Project Veritas
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: purchased the diary after a woman said she found it
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: when she moved into a room previously occupied by Ashley Biden.
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: The conservative leaning journalist's outfit ultimately decided not to publish
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: the diary. Nonetheless, lawyers for Ashley Biden contacted the US
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Maybe this
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: is exactly why now we understand she's getting this big
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: promotion because she was a good soldier. They decided to
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: contact the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York,
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: which turned the missing diary into a federal court case.
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: The contents of the diary, in which the president's daughter
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: discusses drug addiction and questions whether her sexual compulsion stem
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: from Joe Biden allegedly showering with her as a child,
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: had the potential to be politically explosive, reports The Daily Wire.
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: Netburn granted the ruling favorably to Ashley Biden in spite
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: of First Amendment implications. In December of twenty twenty, after
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden had won the presidential election, but while Donald
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: Trump was still in office, three and a half years later,
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden nominated Netburn for a lifetime appointment to the
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: position of District judge for the Southern District of New York.
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: The order that was signed by Netburn ordered Google to
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: turn over information associated with a personal email account of
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: a Project Veritas journalists, while forbidding Google from letting the
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: target know about it, preventing the journalism outfit from fighting
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: the move as well. Quote the information sought his relevant
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: material to an ongoing criminal investigation, and that disclosure to
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: any person of this investigation of this application and order
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: would seriously jeopardize the investigation, the order states. The application
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: for a search warrant was also sealed, making it unknown
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: exactly what prosecutors told Judge Netburn. The case became public
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: after prosecutors then executed a pre dawn raid at the
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: home of three former Project Veritas journalists, drawing condemnation from
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: even left leaning civil liberties groups. But who cares because
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: it's all gone off the rails now. Prosecutors eventually got
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: warrants from Apple as well and Microsoft and other providers
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: from other magistrate judges and press for them to remain sealed.
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: Also in twenty twenty two, Microsoft realized the case was
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: already well publicized, meaning the government could not legitimately argue
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: for sealing them, and prosecutors relented, filing an order to
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: end the non disclosure order which Judge Netburn had signed
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: to keep it all quiet. Fast forward to May of
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. That's when Project Veritas lawyers wrote to
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: Judge Netburn that the subpoenas were unprecedented government invasions into
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: the news gathering work of Project Veritas, which lawfully received
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: an abandoned diary and other personal effects previously belonging to
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: an adult child of then presidential candidate Joe Biden, saying
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: this there is no potential crime to investigate, only First
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: Amendment protected news gathering. They wrote saying that while the
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: government continues to peddle the lie that the diary or
• 13:52
  Speaker 1: other abandoned belongings were stolen, it has produced no support
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: for its false claim, even if it were. Precedence holds
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: that journalists may lawfully receive material from sources, even if
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: that material is illegally obtained by sources themselves. A great
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: example of this would be the Pentagon papers. Another example
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: of this would be what happened with Richard Nixon Netburn.
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: The judge did not immediately return a request for comment
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: to her chambers. Mike Davis, a Republican former Chief Council
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: for Nominations on the Senate Judiciary Committee who now leads
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: the Article three Project, a nonprofit focus on the judiciary,
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: told The Daily Wire that the order is another sign
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: that Netburn is two partisan for this new lifetime appointment nomination.
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: Couldn't agree more, saying this now we learn Sarah Netburn
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: ordered a secret search of a journalist's email account solely
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: to protect Joe Biden from the highly troubling abuse allegations
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: in daughter Ashley Biden's diary. Davis said after reviewing the order, saying, quote,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: Sarah Netburn has proven she doesn't have the necessary judge
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: ship or independence to serve on the federal bench for
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: the rest of her life. That's probably why Joe Biden
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: picked her. I disagree a little bit. I think the
• 15:13
  Speaker 1: only reason why Joe Biden picked her is because she
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: protected Joe Biden from these claims by his daughter that
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: were incredibly damning to him, especially while he was running
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: for president. And so this is the way of saying, Okay,
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: she's a good one, she's a team player. Now here's
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: where the real cover up comes in. The White House
• 15:35
  Speaker 1: is claiming that it was unaware of the order when
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: Biden nominated Netburn and that it was therefore not a
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: factor in the decision. I don't believe that for a moment,
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: Biden's deputy Press Secretary Andrew Bates said, and it responds
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: to the Daily Wire, quote, we are unaware of such a
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: warrant and nothing regarding this case was a factor quote unquote.
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna just say right now, I think they're absolutely
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: lying to you and to everybody else about this nomination.
• 16:05
  Speaker 5: Now.
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: Last month, Amy Harris was sentenced to a month in
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: prison and three years of probation after pleading guilty to
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: taking the diary and selling it to Project Veritas for
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: forty grand Another man named Robert also pled guilty to
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: involvement in a conspiracy involving the diary. After the federal
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: government came down on them hardcore now. In the diary
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: published by Marco Polo, Ashley allegedly writes that she was
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: hyper sexualized at a young age and references showers with
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: her dad that were probably not appropriate. She writes while
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: contemplating her issues with sexual trauma, and said she was
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: resentful of her father because of the money control. On
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: September sixteenth, twenty nineteen, she wrote, I'm going to discontinue
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: this journal after I leave here.
• 17:00
  Speaker 2: Last month, Ashley.
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: Biden acknowledged that the diary was real in a victim
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: impact statement that originally filed under seal but made public
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: after The New York Times argued against its secrecy. In
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: the statement, Ashley Biden says the private diaries publication has
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: led to grotesque lies and that her stream of consciousness
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: thoughts were misconstrued, saying this my personal private journal was
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: stolen and sold for profits. She wrote, I ask your
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: honor to sentence Miss Harris to time in prison followed
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: by lengthy probation. Now Judge Netburn, who is all of
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: a sudden out of nowhere after hooking the Biden family up,
• 17:46
  Speaker 1: is up for a lifetime appointment to the United States
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: District Court for the Southern District of New York, and
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: the White House says, we knew nothing about this ruling
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: when we nominated her. We just randomly liked her, thought
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: she was a great person. Game over, they're lying to
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: you and this is part of the cover up. Yet again, folks,
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: So now we know for certain the diary, like the
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: laptop Hunter's laptop is real. Remember early on they were like, oh,
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: this may not even be her diary that we got.
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: That was Ashley's diary. Oh, I may not even be real,
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: right save with the laptop. Oh, we don't know if
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: it's real. Well, we know it's real. And the reason
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: why they didn't want you to believe it was real
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: early on is because the contents are extremely concerning and alarming.
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: Why is the media not all over this now that
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: it has been confirmed that it is in fact real.
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: Well.
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: In twenty nineteen, Ashley Biden, the then thirty seven year
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: old daughter President Joe Biden and his wife Jill, wrote
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: in her journal about showering with her father at an
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: inappropriate age, as well as her fears that as a
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: child she was sexually abused. Now again, this is coming
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: from Marine Callahan from the Daily Mail. The only person
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: that's put this out there explosive stuff, she writes, not
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: that you would have heard about it thanks to the
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: near well complete year long media blackout on this story,
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: just like they did early on with the Hunter Biden laptop.
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: After undergoing treatment and rehab, Ashley, by the way, moved
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: to a halfway house in Florida, where she left the
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: diary under a mattress. The diary, which also contained details
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: of her drug use, was then found in twenty twenty
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: by a Florida woman who quote unquote stole it, leaked
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: its contents online, and sold it for forty grand. All
• 19:36
  Speaker 1: that time, the Biden campaign let the left wing media
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: of its own well volition cast aspirations on the diaries
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: authenticity or dismissed it as right wing propaganda or plants
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: of dubious you know, you know, absurd things, just like
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: the Russia hoax. Right, just like they did same playbook
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden's laptop. The similarities here turns out both
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: are all too real, The writer writes for the first time,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: Ashley now herself has now confirmed in a court document
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: made public that the diary is indeed authentic. Its contents
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: demand attention concern and hard questions for this White House.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: Hyper Sexualized at a young age, Ashley writes at a
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: July twenty nineteen entry, what is this due to question mark?
• 20:31
  Speaker 2: Was I molested? I think so?
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: She wrote, note the period instead of a question mark.
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: One wonders if there wasn't really a doubt in Ashley's
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: mind because I was I molested?
• 20:45
  Speaker 2: Period?
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: I think so. She continues by writing this and her diary.
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: I can't remember specifics, but I do remember trauma. I
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: remember somewhat being sexualized with her first cousin, Caroline. I
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: remember I remember having sex with friends at a young age.
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: Showers with my dad, probably not appropriate, being turned on
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: when I was supposed when I wasn't supposed to be
• 21:11
  Speaker 1: Showers with my dad, she writes, showers with her dad.
• 21:15
  Speaker 1: Ashley also wrote in the same diary that she was
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: in treatment for sexual trauma. Let's pause here. The author
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: writes to state the obvious. If this were the diary
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: entry of a Trump daughter, the media would be at
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: deafcom one. This would be front page news, the sole
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: focus of special Rachel Maddow you know, losing her mind
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: on MSNBC and cn in primetime investigations would be all
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: about this.
• 21:44
  Speaker 2: There would be a drum.
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: Beat of every Sunday show and on ed from now
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: until election Day, the left wing press demanding answers of
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump. I judge Donald Trump as everything from a
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: racist to a rapist, and never failed to regurgitate accusations,
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: no matter how old or inconsistent, has conveniently ignored similar
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: allegations against Joe Biden. More on those later, Marine continues
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: to write. She then says. Last month, the New York
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: Times reported that the woman who stole Ashley's diary was
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: sentenced to time hard time in prison. Did the Times
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: cover what was actually in the diary, question mark, not
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: one bit, not even a hint of its contents. Instead,
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: they led with the thief's brazen scheme to steal the
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: diary of President Biden's daughter and sell it to a
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: right wing group and hope of disrupting the twenty twenty election.
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: Linked within this story was a letter written by Ashley, who,
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: in fairness, has never asserved the diary was a fake.
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: Unlike Hunter in his laptop, Her letter, dated April eighth,
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: and addressed to the trial judge, confirms the diary's legitimate
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: see saying this my personal private journal, she writes with
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: stolen and sold for profit. I will forever have to
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: deal with the fact that my personal journal can be
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: viewed online. The theft is indeed terrible, but so too
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: is what Ashley's diary entries might imply. In one passage,
• 23:21
  Speaker 1: she writes in her childhood hyper sexualization extended to beating
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: her blank due to overhearing parents having sex. That's in
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: her diary, folks, And yet The New York Times, as
• 23:35
  Speaker 1: with nearly all things negative to Biden, insists there's nothing
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: to see here and that they're covering Biden as critically
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: as Trump.
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: Sure.
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: In an interview earlier this month, executive editor Joe Cohn
• 23:48
  Speaker 1: claimed that his paper is not and will not be
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: an instrument of the Biden campaign con is either delusional, shameless,
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: or cowed by the wokery infesting his newsroom. Try googling
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: Ashley Biden's diary, You'll find scant media coverage, and what
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: you do find will be about the theft, not about
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: what's written in the diary itself, you know, the actual
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: news and trying to determine the root causes of her
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: sex addiction, actually listed the following in her diary, my
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: mother not emotionally available. My father was message I could
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: get love from men. Quote I'm not your mother, blanket
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: being taken away, not letting myself go to bathroom, being
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: wiped until too late in the game. While this list
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: itself isn't necessarily the most well strange passage, I guess
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: the best way to say it from the diary. Collectively,
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: this all raises serious questions for doctor Jill and Grandpa
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: Joe with his repeat hair sniffing and shoulder rubbing of
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: women and young girls.
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: The author continues to write in.
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: The Daily Mail Joe with the multiple allegations by at
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: least eight women of unwanted touching or worse. Here is
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: former Senate Stafford Tara Reid, largely dismissed by the media
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: during the twenty twenty election cycle, in March of that year,
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: saying this quote, I remember he just had me up
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: against the wall, and the wall was cold. It happened
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: all at once. His hands were on me and underneath
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: my clothes. He went down my skirt but then up
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: inside it, and he penetrated me with his fingers. When
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: he got finished doing what he was doing, I pulled
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: back and he said, come on, man, I heard you
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: like me. Reid continues. For me, it was like everything
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: everything shattered in that moment. I looked up to him.
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: He was this champion of women's rights. In my eyes,
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: That's what they used to say about the late Democratic
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: Senator Ted Kennedy, iffy with women in his personal life,
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: but great and legislating for them.
• 26:10
  Speaker 4: Now.
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: The author goes on to say even more about this.
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: But what I go back to is why is it
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: that there's no one here in the media willing to
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: write the story that a the journal is real and
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: be what's in the journal? It's a very simple question.
• 26:31
  Speaker 1: You look at what was just said there, You look
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: at the journal, and Marine Callahan is saying in the
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: Daily Mail, this should be a massive story. And by
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: the way, it should be a massive story. But the
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: media is going to bury it. Everything that his own
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: daughter wrote, they are going to bury it. They're going
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: to make sure that no one is asked about this
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: on the campaign or at the White House press briefing.
• 27:04
  Speaker 1: Why would you ever answer any of these questions? Is
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: the and why would you ever talk about it? We
• 27:10
  Speaker 1: just move on and we act like it's not real.
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: We act like it never happened. We act like it's
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: not a thing. That is what they will do to
• 27:18
  Speaker 1: protect this president at all costs, moving in to this
• 27:22
  Speaker 1: major election cycle now. As uncomfortable as much of that
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: was that I just read to you, it's important because
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: I promise you, if it was a Republican it would
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: be game over.
• 27:36
  Speaker 2: I promise you.
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: If this was Donald Trump's child that wrote this in
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: a but a diary, there would be a full blown
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: federal investigation. There would be local and state investigations that
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: would be opened. They would have made sure that somebody
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: had to testify about this, saying that no one is
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: above the law. All I'm asked looking for is that
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: same standard here. Make sure you share this podcast with
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: your family and your friends. Please and help us by
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: writing us a five star review, and I'll see you
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: back here tomorrow