Latest / Connecting the Dots / Amazon's Satellite Ascent, Globalstar's Billion-Dollar Deal, and Anti-AI Extremism

Transcript

Amazon's Satellite Ascent, Globalstar's Billion-Dollar Deal, and Anti-AI Extremism · Connecting the Dots

• 0:00
  Today's tech news moves fast, but understanding
• 0:03
  it shouldn't be hard. That's why Snarfle Solutions
• 0:06
  Group brings you Connecting the Dots, where we
• 0:09
  break down what's happening in tech and why it
• 0:11
  matters to you. Now, let's dive in with your
• 0:14
  hosts. What do a Molotov cocktail in San Francisco,
• 0:19
  an $11 billion space race, and your local Amazon
• 0:23
  delivery van have in common? Quite a lot, actually.
• 0:26
  Yeah, they are all massive battlegrounds where
• 0:28
  digital technology is actively colliding with
• 0:31
  our physical, everyday world. Welcome to Connecting
• 0:34
  the Dots. I'm Alex. And I'm Morgan. We are broadcasting
• 0:36
  to you right here from Snarfle Solutions Group
• 0:39
  in sunny Sacramento, California. Today is Tuesday,
• 0:42
  April 14th, 2026. And before we get into today's
• 0:46
  morning Star Tech article report, let's get you
• 0:48
  caught up on what's happening outside your window
• 0:50
  and, you know, in your wallet. Yeah, let's look
• 0:52
  closer at the weather first. Here in Sacramento,
• 0:54
  we're looking at patchy fog that is going to
• 0:57
  burn off and turn mostly sunny, which is always
• 1:00
  nice. Right. We're hitting a very comfortable
• 1:02
  69 degrees Fahrenheit with a light breeze right
• 1:05
  around two to seven miles per hour. But if you're
• 1:08
  traveling or listening nationally, keep an eye
• 1:10
  out. Yeah, definitely. There are currently 305
• 1:13
  active weather alerts across the country, with
• 1:16
  169 of those over land, so definitely check weather
• 1:20
  .gov if you're hitting the road today. Good call.
• 1:24
  Well, the financial landscape is looking significantly
• 1:26
  brighter than that morning fog. The market performance
• 1:28
  we're seeing right now is just, well, it's exceptionally
• 1:30
  strong across the board. It really is. I mean,
• 1:32
  the Dow Jones jumped over 500 points yesterday,
• 1:35
  closing at 48 ,218 .25. Massive jump. Yeah. And
• 1:40
  the S &P 500 rose nearly 80 points, ending the
• 1:43
  day at 6 ,886 .24. And of course, Bitcoin continues
• 1:47
  its relentless climb. As it does. Right. It opened
• 1:50
  today at 74 ,440. But I think the most encouraging
• 1:58
  metric for anyone tracking their retirement or
• 2:01
  investment portfolios is that all three of these
• 2:03
  major indicators have seen roughly three to four
• 2:05
  percent weekly gains since last week. Which is
• 2:08
  huge. A broad, sustained lift like that indicates
• 2:10
  a lot of underlying confidence in the market
• 2:12
  right now. It sets a highly positive financial
• 2:14
  mood heading into the rest of the quarter. Absolutely.
• 2:17
  Today's episode is brought to you by Strong Coffee.
• 2:19
  the premium instant coffee that tastes like a
• 2:22
  traditional brew, but is packed with 15 grams
• 2:25
  of protein, MCTs, and adaptogens like ashwagandha.
• 2:29
  Get clean, sustained energy without the jitters.
• 2:32
  Use promo code SNARFL for 20 % off at strongcoffeecompany
• 2:36
  .com. All right, so our focus for today's Morning
• 2:39
  Star Report tackles a pretty big misconception.
• 2:42
  We frequently talk about the tech industry as
• 2:43
  this invisible... Cloud -based entity. Yeah,
• 2:46
  like software algorithms, data centers humming
• 2:49
  away in the middle of the nowhere. Exactly. But
• 2:51
  the reality is that the massive infrastructure
• 2:54
  supporting these digital ecosystems is spilling
• 2:56
  over into our physical neighborhoods, our atmosphere,
• 3:00
  and well, our social stability. Let's unpack
• 3:02
  this. We're looking at logistics, satellite communications,
• 3:05
  and a really disturbing incident of physical
• 3:07
  violence in the AI sector. Yeah. But let's start
• 3:10
  right on the ground with Amazon. We are seeing
• 3:12
  how tech giants are actively trying to clean
• 3:14
  up their physical footprint right in our backyards.
• 3:16
  Which is a big deal for local communities. It
• 3:18
  is. Amazon has rolled out a new delivery station
• 3:21
  that is doubling as a massive real -world exercise
• 3:25
  in sustainability. They have packed this facility
• 3:28
  with more than 40 market -ready technologies
• 3:30
  and systems that are specifically designed to
• 3:33
  shrink their carbon footprint and, you know,
• 3:36
  heavily reduce resource usage. Right. And the
• 3:39
  emphasis there really needs to be on market -ready
• 3:42
  technologies working together as a single cohesive
• 3:45
  unit. What do you mean by cohesive unit? Well,
• 3:48
  when a company of this size talks about a green
• 3:50
  facility, the assumption is often that they just
• 3:54
  slapped a few acres of solar panels on the roof
• 3:56
  and issued a press release. Yeah, the classic
• 3:58
  corporate greenwashing. Exactly. But this is
• 4:01
  systemic integration. They are networking their
• 4:03
  water reclamation systems directly with their
• 4:06
  temperature regulation. Oh, wow. Yeah. And they
• 4:08
  are tying their delivery fleet charging stations
• 4:10
  into massive on -site energy storage solutions.
• 4:13
  They are even evaluating the thermal dynamics
• 4:16
  of the building materials themselves to minimize
• 4:18
  the HVAC load. That is intense. It is. It's a
• 4:22
  complete overhaul of the foundation. blueprint
• 4:24
  for a logistics hub. It sounds like taking the
• 4:26
  concept of a personal smart home and just scaling
• 4:30
  it up to an industrial extreme. That's a great
• 4:32
  way to put it. Like when you optimize your own
• 4:34
  house, you install eco -friendly water fixtures,
• 4:38
  a smart thermostat, maybe a home battery wall.
• 4:40
  You're balancing the input and output of your
• 4:43
  own little bubble. Right. But they are doing
• 4:46
  that for a facility that processes tens of thousands
• 4:49
  of packages a day. But I'm going to push back
• 4:51
  on the motivations here for a second. OK, let's
• 4:53
  hear it. Retrofitting a facility with 40 new
• 4:56
  integrated tech systems has to cost hundreds
• 4:59
  of millions of dollars upfront. Easily. So how
• 5:02
  long does it actually take to see a return on
• 5:04
  investment for like fraction of a percent energy
• 5:07
  savings? Is this systemic integration driven
• 5:10
  by actual economic survival or is this just an
• 5:14
  incredibly expensive PR stunt to appease local
• 5:16
  regulators? You know, it's a fair question, but
• 5:19
  the math actually pencils out purely on the economics
• 5:22
  You just have to look at the massive scale of
• 5:25
  the Amazon's operation to see it. Okay scale
• 5:27
  it out for me Well, logistics is fundamentally
• 5:29
  a game of extreme margins. Waste of any kind.
• 5:34
  Whether it is idled electricity, inefficient
• 5:35
  fleet routing, or municipal water costs, it bleeds
• 5:40
  the bottom line. Trimming a fraction of a percent
• 5:42
  off energy costs at a single facility might take
• 5:46
  a decade to pay off the initial hardware investment.
• 5:49
  Right. But when you prove the concept and deploy
• 5:51
  those systems across hundreds of fulfillment
• 5:53
  centers globally, those micro efficiencies compound
• 5:56
  into billions of dollars in permanent operational
• 5:59
  savings. Well, Ian. Yeah. The PR value and the
• 6:03
  regulatory goodwill are really secondary benefits
• 6:06
  to the core objective, which is shielding their
• 6:08
  supply chain from future resource constraints
• 6:10
  and price volatility. That makes total sense.
• 6:13
  And for you, the listener, going about your day,
• 6:15
  especially if you are a working professional
• 6:17
  or raising a family in a community where one
• 6:19
  of these massive industrial hubs operates the
• 6:22
  corporate motivation really matters less than
• 6:24
  the physical results. Exactly, the end result
• 6:26
  is what impacts you. Right, because the result
• 6:29
  is cleaner local air. It means these massive
• 6:33
  warehouses are putting significantly less strain
• 6:35
  on your municipal water supplies and local power
• 6:38
  grids during peak hours. Which prevents things
• 6:40
  like local brownouts. Exactly. As the logistics
• 6:44
  industry shifts this baseline, the immediate
• 6:47
  physical environment around these commercial
• 6:48
  zones becomes tangibly healthier. Yeah, it's
• 6:51
  a localized benefit of a macro corporate strategy.
• 6:54
  They fix their bottom line, and the surrounding
• 6:56
  neighborhood gets less diesel exhaust and fewer
• 6:59
  grid issues. It's a great localized benefit,
• 7:02
  but Amazon's ambitions right now are anything
• 7:05
  but localized. Yeah, no, they are definitely
• 7:06
  not. No. While they are overhauling the infrastructure
• 7:09
  on the dirt, they are making an even more aggressive
• 7:11
  and expensive infrastructure play up in the stars.
• 7:14
  A much more expensive play. Yeah. Amazon just
• 7:16
  entered into a definitive merger agreement to
• 7:18
  acquire the satellite operator Global Star for
• 7:21
  $11 .57 billion. That number is just staggering.
• 7:26
  And the structure of this acquisition is a massive
• 7:29
  flex of Amazon's financial leverage. Well, they
• 7:32
  are acquiring Global Star for $90 a share. That
• 7:36
  represents a 23 .5 % premium over the closing
• 7:39
  price right before the announcement. Wow, almost
• 7:41
  a quarter premium. Yeah, and they are giving
• 7:44
  Global Star shareholders a choice. They can take
• 7:46
  that payout in cash, which Amazon has capped
• 7:49
  at 40 % of the total shares, or they can convert
• 7:52
  it into Amazon stock. Okay. And the entire deal
• 7:55
  is projected to close in 2027. The obvious question
• 7:58
  here is the why. Why drop nearly 12 billion dollars
• 8:02
  on a legacy satellite operator? I mean, Amazon
• 8:05
  already has its own satellite internet initiative,
• 8:07
  right? Yeah, Project Kuiper. Right, Project Kuiper,
• 8:10
  also known as Amazon Leo. And haven't they already
• 8:12
  committed like 17 billion dollars to building
• 8:14
  that out? They have. So why buy Global Star instead
• 8:17
  of just pouring that 11 .5 billion into manufacturing
• 8:20
  their own hardware? Because Amazon isn't primarily
• 8:23
  buying the metal floating in space. Okay. What
• 8:26
  are they buying? They are buying the invisible
• 8:28
  infrastructure that makes that metal useful.
• 8:31
  Specifically, they are buying spectrum and time.
• 8:34
  Spectrum and time. Yeah. GlobalStar holds globally
• 8:37
  harmonized L -band and S -band spectrum licenses.
• 8:41
  For anyone tracking the telecommunications sector,
• 8:45
  you know that spectrum the radio frequencies
• 8:47
  used to transmit data is a finite, heavily regulated
• 8:50
  global resource. And the L -band and S -band
• 8:53
  frequencies are basically the absolute holy grail
• 8:56
  for direct -to -device communication. Exactly.
• 8:59
  Because unlike higher frequency bands that offer
• 9:01
  massive data speeds but get easily blocked by
• 9:03
  buildings, heavy rain, or even like... thick
• 9:06
  cloud cover. L -band and S -band frequencies
• 9:09
  have incredible penetration characteristics.
• 9:11
  They're cut right through it. Yeah, they can
• 9:12
  punch through bad weather and connect directly
• 9:14
  to the small antenna inside a standard smartphone.
• 9:17
  Which is why those licenses are invaluable. You
• 9:19
  can manufacture 10 ,000 satellites, but if you
• 9:22
  don't have the international legal rights to
• 9:24
  broadcast on those specific penetrating frequencies
• 9:27
  across more than 120 countries, your network
• 9:30
  is useless for mobile users. Right. It's just
• 9:32
  space junk. Exactly. By acquiring Global Star,
• 9:36
  Amazon instantly absorbs those global licenses,
• 9:38
  along with a fully operational ground station
• 9:41
  network that spans 24 gateways around the planet.
• 9:44
  And that plays directly into the time factor
• 9:45
  you mentioned. Buying Global Star is like Amazon
• 9:48
  buying the only existing transcontinental highway
• 9:51
  instead of waiting five years for the international
• 9:54
  permits to pave their own road. That's a perfect
• 9:56
  analogy. Right now, Amazon Leo only has roughly
• 10:00
  180 to 200 satellites in orbit. Contrast that
• 10:04
  with SpaceX's Starlink, which has over 10 ,000
• 10:07
  satellites currently operating. A huge gap. Massive.
• 10:11
  And Amazon has been facing immense regulatory
• 10:13
  pressure from the FCC regarding their deployment
• 10:15
  deadlines. So this acquisition compresses years
• 10:18
  of bureaucratic red tape and internal development,
• 10:20
  fast tracking their timeline to launch direct
• 10:22
  -to -device cellular services by 2028. The timeline
• 10:26
  totally makes sense, but The actual execution
• 10:30
  of this merger involved one of the most complex
• 10:32
  corporate standoffs we've seen this year. Oh,
• 10:34
  yeah. Because the major complication in the room
• 10:36
  was Apple. I was reading up on the mechanics
• 10:38
  of that complication, and it's basically a master
• 10:41
  class in corporate leverage. Apple didn't just
• 10:43
  have a minor passive stake in Global Start. Not
• 10:46
  at all. They poured $1 .5 billion into the company
• 10:49
  back in 2024 to acquire a 20 % stake. And they
• 10:54
  did that to lock down the infrastructure required
• 10:56
  to power the iPhone's emergency SOS feature.
• 10:59
  So Apple basically had a golden ticket and a
• 11:01
  partial deed to the network Amazon wanted to
• 11:03
  buy outright. Which forced a massive three -way
• 11:06
  negotiation table. You have Amazon wanting total
• 11:09
  control to fight SpaceX, Apple refusing to lose
• 11:12
  the backbone of their flagship safety features,
• 11:15
  and Global Star just caught in the middle. Sounds
• 11:17
  tense. Very. The resulting agreement stipulates
• 11:20
  that Amazon Leo will now power Apple's entire
• 11:22
  suite of satellite services. That includes emergency
• 11:25
  SOS, messages via satellite, find my, and roadside
• 11:28
  assistance. So essentially, Amazon pays $11 .5
• 11:31
  billion for the Cosmic Express lane to catch
• 11:34
  up with Elon Musk, and Apple gets to keep riding
• 11:37
  shotgun without having to build and maintain
• 11:39
  their own multi -billion dollar satellite constellation.
• 11:42
  That's exactly it. It solves both of their immediate
• 11:44
  problems. Amazon gets the spectrum and the gateway
• 11:48
  infrastructure to rival Starlink's dominance,
• 11:51
  and Apple guarantees that their safety -critical
• 11:53
  services remain operational. And they likely
• 11:56
  get significantly faster as Amazon upgrades the
• 11:59
  hardware. For the everyday consumer, this kind
• 12:02
  of consolidation is, you know, a complex reality
• 12:05
  to navigate. On the positive side, putting the
• 12:09
  logistical and financial juggernaut of Amazon
• 12:11
  behind this network ensures it will be robust
• 12:14
  and reliable. But on the flip side, we are watching
• 12:17
  the creation of a massive oligopoly over global
• 12:20
  off -the -grid communication. Yeah, that's the
• 12:22
  concern. You have SpaceX on one side and an Amazon
• 12:25
  -Apple alliance on the other. Over time, that
• 12:28
  lack of competition in the space sector is going
• 12:30
  to dictate the pricing power for these direct
• 12:32
  -to -device services. The financial implications
• 12:35
  for the consumer might tighten over the next
• 12:36
  decade, sure, but the physical reality of this
• 12:39
  technology today is undeniably life -saving.
• 12:42
  The infrastructure these companies are battling
• 12:44
  over is actively pulling people out of fatal
• 12:46
  situations. Yeah, the sources actually highlighted
• 12:49
  two specific recent examples of this exact global
• 12:52
  star network in action. I saw those. A scout
• 12:55
  troop was stranded on a remote winter hike in
• 12:57
  British Columbia and used the satellite connection
• 12:59
  to coordinate a rescue. Amazing. And in Colorado,
• 13:02
  a woman was airlifted to safety after her car
• 13:05
  rolled 250 feet down a cliff into an area with
• 13:08
  zero cellular reception. Terrifying, but thank
• 13:11
  goodness she had that tech. Exactly. Without
• 13:14
  that orbital infrastructure, those isolated incidents
• 13:17
  end in tragedy. For families listening who travel,
• 13:21
  hike, or drive through dead zones, knowing that
• 13:23
  a multi -billion dollar safety net is hovering
• 13:26
  right above you provides incredible peace of
• 13:28
  mind. It is a really comforting thought that
• 13:30
  the tech industry is deploying this immense power
• 13:33
  to build safety nets in space. Yeah. But the
• 13:37
  sheer scale of that power and the rapid deployment
• 13:39
  of artificial intelligence is creating a very
• 13:42
  different reality on the ground. The anxiety
• 13:45
  over tech's influence on our society is boiling
• 13:47
  over into actual physical violence. Yes, and
• 13:50
  as we unpack this next incident, it is vital
• 13:52
  to separate the physical act of violence from
• 13:55
  the broader social discourse. Absolutely. We
• 13:57
  want to explicitly state that we are impartially
• 14:00
  reporting the facts of this escalation directly
• 14:03
  from law enforcement and the provided sources.
• 14:05
  We are not endorsing any views, nor are we taking
• 14:08
  a side in the very complex ongoing debates about
• 14:11
  AI safety and its societal impact. Right. We
• 14:13
  are just giving you the facts of what happened.
• 14:15
  Exactly. As OpenAI themselves stated in response
• 14:18
  to this event, a healthy democracy requires good
• 14:21
  faith debate. There is absolutely no place for
• 14:24
  violence, regardless of your stance on artificial
• 14:26
  intelligence. intelligence. And the facts of
• 14:28
  this incident are truly harrowing. Yeah. The
• 14:30
  U .S. Department of Justice has officially charged
• 14:33
  20 -year -old Daniel Moreno Gamma from Spring,
• 14:35
  Texas. According to the federal criminal complaint,
• 14:38
  the timeline began on Friday, April 10th, when
• 14:41
  Moreno Gamma traveled from Texas to San Francisco.
• 14:43
  Okay. That evening he approached the private
• 14:46
  residence of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and threw
• 14:49
  a Molotov cocktail at the home. Just incredible.
• 14:52
  After attacking the private residence, he fled
• 14:55
  and went directly to the headquarters of OpenAI.
• 14:58
  He smashed the glass front doors of the building
• 15:00
  with a chair. Jeez. Yeah. And once he broke the
• 15:03
  glass, he explicitly threatened to burn the entire
• 15:06
  building down and kill anyone inside. It's terrifying.
• 15:09
  Fortunately, no one was injured in either location.
• 15:12
  Police arrived rapidly and arrested him outside
• 15:14
  the OpenAI offices. But the inventory of what
• 15:18
  he was carrying when arrested really highlights
• 15:21
  the severity of his intent. What did he have
• 15:23
  on him? Law enforcement recovered incendiary
• 15:26
  devices, a jug of kerosene, and a blue lighter.
• 15:29
  Beyond the physical weapons, they found a three
• 15:31
  -part manifesto he authored titled Your Last
• 15:34
  Warning. Right, the manifesto. The contents of
• 15:36
  this document map a really disturbing psychological
• 15:39
  shift from abstract internet forum dread to targeted,
• 15:43
  radicalized violence. The document explicitly
• 15:45
  advocated for the killing of AI CEOs and tech
• 15:48
  investors. It went as far as listing the names
• 15:50
  and physical addresses of apparent board members
• 15:53
  of various AI companies. It also featured a chilling
• 15:56
  note addressed directly to Sam Altman, demanding
• 15:59
  that if he survived the initial attacks, he must
• 16:01
  redeem himself. That is deeply unsettling. and
• 16:05
  it demonstrates a high degree of premeditation.
• 16:08
  Investigators discovered that on the same day
• 16:09
  he executed these attacks in San Francisco, he
• 16:12
  emailed a version of this manifesto to representatives
• 16:15
  at his former college, Lone Star College in Texas.
• 16:18
  And because of that premeditation and the use
• 16:21
  of explosives, the legal consequences he is facing
• 16:24
  go far beyond vandalism or standard property
• 16:27
  damage. Moreno Gamma is facing severe state and
• 16:30
  federal charges. Really serious charges. Yeah.
• 16:32
  The list includes attempted murder, which covers
• 16:34
  both Altman and the security personnel present.
• 16:37
  It also includes attempted arson, possession
• 16:40
  of an unregistered firearm and the use of explosives.
• 16:42
  The way the justice system is categorizing this
• 16:45
  violence is a critical indicator of how the government
• 16:48
  views attacks on the tech sector. Well, Craig
• 16:50
  Misakian, the U .S. attorney for the Northern
• 16:52
  District of California, issued a very pointed
• 16:55
  statement regarding the prosecution. He stated
• 16:58
  that if the evidence shows Merino -Gama executed
• 17:00
  these attacks in an attempt to change public
• 17:03
  policy, or to coerce government and other officials
• 17:06
  regarding artificial intelligence, they will
• 17:08
  prosecute this as an act of domestic terrorism.
• 17:10
  Domestic terrorism. That legal threshold is a
• 17:13
  massive shift in the landscape for working professionals
• 17:16
  in this industry. Huge shift. The tech sector's
• 17:19
  foundational ethos has always been to move fast,
• 17:22
  break things, and operate with, like, open campus
• 17:25
  style environments. But when the disruption caused
• 17:28
  by your software triggers this level of societal
• 17:30
  anxiety, the physical walls literally have to
• 17:33
  go up. Right. Does this mean the leaders of these
• 17:36
  companies now have to operate with the security
• 17:38
  apparatus of high level political figures? I
• 17:41
  mean, that is the new reality, the philosophical
• 17:43
  debates we have all engaged in regarding AI,
• 17:46
  the discussions about job displacement. existential
• 17:48
  risk, and the loss of human agency, they're no
• 17:51
  longer confined to boardrooms or academic papers.
• 17:54
  Clearly not. When the FBI, San Francisco acting
• 17:57
  special agent in charge, publicly states that
• 17:59
  they will not tolerate threats against the nation's
• 18:02
  innovation leaders, it is a formal acknowledgement
• 18:05
  that the tech sector is now a physical battleground
• 18:08
  for ideological conflicts. Yeah. Violence cannot
• 18:11
  be the accepted norm for expressing disagreement
• 18:14
  with technological progress. But these companies
• 18:16
  are now forced to build physical moats to defend
• 18:19
  against it. If we step back and look at the progression
• 18:34
  of the systems we've explored today, there is
• 18:37
  a very clear defining through line. Yeah, we
• 18:39
  started on the ground with Amazon overhauling
• 18:41
  our local delivery routes, trying to physically
• 18:43
  harmonize their massive industrial logistics
• 18:45
  footprint with the local environments we live
• 18:47
  in. Right. We then zoomed out to orbit, looking
• 18:49
  at a multi -billion dollar alliance between Amazon
• 18:51
  and Apple that is literally securing our physical
• 18:54
  safety nets from space. And then back down. Yeah,
• 18:57
  finally, we came crashing back down to Earth
• 19:00
  to confront the intense, dangerous friction caused
• 19:03
  when the rapid development of artificial intelligence
• 19:06
  collides with human anxiety. And the common denominator
• 19:09
  connecting all of these dots is entanglement.
• 19:12
  Entanglement? Yes. Our physical neighborhood
• 19:15
  logistics, our global emergency communications,
• 19:18
  and our most intense societal anxieties are all
• 19:21
  becoming entirely entangled with the decisions
• 19:23
  made by just a handful of incredibly powerful
• 19:27
  tech giants. Which leaves you with a critical
• 19:29
  question to consider as you navigate the rest
• 19:31
  of your day. What's that? As everyday citizens,
• 19:34
  how do we maintain our autonomy, our sense of
• 19:37
  individual control and agency in a world where
• 19:40
  these few companies are simultaneously the ultimate
• 19:42
  architects of our safety nets and the primary
• 19:45
  lightning rods for our greatest controversies?
• 19:47
  Finding the balance between relying on their
• 19:49
  infrastructure and preserving our independence
• 19:51
  is truly the defining challenge of our era. We're
• 19:54
  here to help at Snarful, so reach out on our
• 19:56
  website if you have any more questions. That's
• 20:01
  a wrap on today's top stories. Remember, tech
• 20:04
  doesn't have to be complicated, and we're here
• 20:06
  to help connect the dots. If you've got questions
• 20:09
  or want to learn more, visit us at snarful .com.
• 20:13
  Thanks for listening, and we'll catch you next
• 20:15
  time.