Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Pentagon "Accounting Error" Gives More Arms to Ukraine "Accidentally"

Transcript

Pentagon "Accounting Error" Gives More Arms to Ukraine "Accidentally" · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: GOP Committee chairmen are demanding documents now from the CIA
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: related to public statements from ex Intel officials questioning the
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden laptop story. Now, I want to give you
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: that headline before I tell you about another controversy. They're
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: calling it the Big Oops. And I want you to
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: think while I tell you about this story, if there's
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: any way you believe the US government that this was
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: a oops? How big of an oops? A three billion
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: dollar oops to you the taxpayer? Yeah, three billion Pentagon
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: accounting error means more arms accidentally. They want you to
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: believe more arms accidentally for Ukraine. I'm still angry over
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: this story because I have no doubt that this wasn't
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: an accident. I have no faith in our government right
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: now to tell us the truth, to abide by the laws,
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: to be honest with us. We know this from the
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: Durham Report. We know this also from reports now that
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: three different investigations into the Clintons were killed were now
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: being told through the Durham Report. Three different investigations into
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: the Clintons. Now, I'm going to tell you those stories
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: in a moment, but again, think about the oops here,
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: and you tell me if you believe our government. What's
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: a lazy couple of billions in US taxpayer dollars when
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: there's a war in Eastern Europe to fight? That question
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: was answered yesterday when the Defense Department revealed quietly that
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: it can send more weapons to Ukraine without congress spending approval,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: after the Pentagon overestimated the value of the arms that
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: had already sent a key by some three billion dollars.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: The Association the Associated Press was the first to report
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: the error caused when officials quote wrongfully used valuations for
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: new equipment rather than for used equipment drawn from US
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: stocks to assess the cost of weapons already dispatched to
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: the war zone. So, in other words, they're telling you, hey,
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: are bad. We priced out When we were telling you
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: what it was going to cost to send weapons to Ukraine,
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: we actually sent out an estimate for an essence, new cars.
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: We didn't realize we were sending used cars. So therefore
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: we can actually send a lot more of the used cars.
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: The only difference is this isn't used cars are sending.
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: This is actual weaponry. So translation, yeah, we lie to you.
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: That's what we did. We lied. We lied to you,
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: and we told you that things were good and that
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: this is how much it was going to cost for
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: military equipment. We knew we were screwing you, the taxpayers,
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: because we wanted to send more weapons will reach to
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: Ukraine than you probably would have agreed to or allowed
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: us to. So what we did is we marked it
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: as new military weaponry and new equipment. In reality it
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: was used equipment. So we had to remark the value
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: of said used equipment. And then we got to assess
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: the cost of weapons that we've dispatched the war zone
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: and discount them so we can send more. Who's to blame?
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: They're claiming it was poor accounting methodology. The Pentagon, now
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: facing increased pressure by Congress to show accountability for the
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: billions of dollars is sending weapons, ammunition, equipment, and training
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: to Ukraine. And as some lawmakers question whether the level
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: of support is sustainable, they're now saying, no, no, no, we
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: got more money for this. You guys have already approved it.
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: We just sent the wrong weaponry so we can actually
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: send more of it. The one hundred and thirteen billion
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: in USA to Ukraine has eclipsed the annual military budget
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: of every country in the world except the United States
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: and China. Let me say that again. The one hundred
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: and thirteen billion in USA that we have sent so
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: far to Ukraine has eclipped the annual military budget of
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: every country on the face of the earth except for
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: US and China. Let that sink in, and they want
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: to send more. In many of the military aid packages,
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: the Pentagon has opted to drain stockpiles of older existing
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: gear because quote, it can get those Ukraine, they claimed faster. So,
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: in other words, they knew what they were doing the
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: entire time. They just lied to you. Pentagon spokesman addressed
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: the financial mess by saying this quote. During our regular
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: oversight process of presidential drawdown packages, the Department discovered inconsistencies
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: and equipment valuations for Ukraine. In some cases, replacement cost
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: rather than netbook value was used, therefore overestimating the value
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: of the equipment drawn down from US stockpiles sent to Ukraine.
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: They knew this, by the way, they're just lying to you.
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: The Pentagon added, the mistake hadn't constrained US support to
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: Ukraine or hampered the ability to send aid to the battlefield. Now,
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: according to this AP report, a Defensive official said the
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: Pentagon is still trying to determine exactly how much the
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: total surplus will be, so there may be a lot
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: more money they can spend. The official, who spoke on
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: condition of us not knowing who they are, also, I
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: would argue at this point as clearly a whistleblower said
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: the Comptroller had asked the Military services to review all
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: previous Ukraine aid packages using the proper cost figures. Wow,
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: they may find a whole lot more money, right. Biden
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: announced on Wednesday afternoon that he also to proved sending
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: thirty one Abrams in one main battle tanks to Ukraine
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: in an escalation of US support for the war as
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: it nears the one year mark. Did you know that?
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: No?
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: Why? Because that was also a buried part of the story.
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: Four hundred million in aid package was what that one
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: was when that story came out, And I bet you
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: to know we're sending Abrams tanks to Ukraine. The results,
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: said the official, will be that the Department will have
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: quote more available funding authority to use as the Ukraine
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: offensive nears. The aide surplus was also reported on by
• 7:09
  Speaker 1: another whistleblower who went to the Wall Street Journal. To date,
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: the US has provided Ukraine with nearly thirty seven billion
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: in military aids since Russia invaded in February of twenty
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: twenty two. The Russia US weapons to Ukraine has already
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: sparked a warning that domestic military stockpiles have been quote
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: pushed to dangerously low levels not seen for decades. A
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: new report out states, how bad is it. We're not
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: ready if we had to go back into a place
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: like Afghanistan or Iraq because we've given our weapons to Ukraine.
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: That's right. A Bank of America analysis issue a report
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: on Friday warning that America's military support for Ukraine and
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: the conflict with Russia has pushed United States stockpiles to
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: quote dangerously low levels not seen for decades. As part
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: of the sixteen point two billion a new support for Ukraine,
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: the Department of Defense has sent approximately eight point four
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: billion worth of military equipment from its own weapon stockpiles. Apparently,
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: now we know they lied to us, it's going to
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: be even more than that. The analysis in the paper
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: stated this presidential drawdowns have pushed US weapon stockpiles to
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: quote dangerously low levels that have not been seen for decades.
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: On several ground systems, DoD officials have indicated that ammunition
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: stocks have dwindled to levels that would be considered problematic
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: during wartime. The analysis wrote that as the United States
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: continues to provide military assistance Ukraine, major defense contractors have
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: been tasked with meaning demand throughout the Europe area and
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: restocking United States military inventories depleted as a result of
• 8:59
  Speaker 1: the one key presidential drawdown since August of last year.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: So twenty different times that you have Defense Secretary Austin
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: and many others right who are like, hey, we need
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: more stuff. They forecast that Raytheon Technologies, Lockheed Martin, and
• 9:17
  Speaker 1: General Dynamics are best positioned to quote benefit from the
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: demands given their experience and producing legacy ground based systems.
• 9:25
  Speaker 1: You want to know where the Defense Secretary Word Austin
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: used to work before he became the Defense chief. He
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: worked at Raytheon Technologies, the same company that's now been
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: stated Lloyd Austin's former employer to benefit the most from
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: the military stock piled drawdown. Lastly, they wrote through the
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: DoD was actually expected to pivot away from those systems anyway,
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: as it looked to shift away from the ground based
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: wars in the Middle East, to prepare for war in
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: the Pacific, but that the Ukraine conflict had renewed their
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: importance and certainly they could use this information. I'm just
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: going to say it again. They lied to you. They
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: lied to every taxpayer out there. They lied, and they
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: knew they were lying, and they're lying to you now,
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: and they're going to get away with it because no
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: one's paying attention. And we're sending billions and billions and
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: billions and billions and billions of dollars in aid to
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: a country that is embezzling billions and billions of dollars
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: into their oligarch's bank accounts. Never forget that. I want
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: you to think about what I just told you about
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: Ukraine as a pretext for what I'm about to talk about.
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: It's very clear that our government will lie to us.
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: And now it's normal to lie to you. It's normal
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: to have coup attempts to overthrow the will of the people.
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: It's normal to frame presence for crimes they never committed.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: It's normal to rest people for crimes they didn't commit.
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: It's normal now to label people to domestic terrasts if
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: you want to silence them. Did you know that every
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: single person every investigation on January the sixth, even when
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: they were misdemeanors. We've now found out from a new whistleblower,
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: was labeled as a domestic terrace. If you were just
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: there doing nothing but walking around and they had your name,
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: you were labeled as a domestic terrorist case. It could
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: be as simple as trespassing. You didn't hurt anybody, you
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: walked through an open door, You just walked around and
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: you left. You did nothing wrong, You just walked around,
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: and they you were labeled as a domestic terrorist because
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: that's what the government wanted to do. They wanted everybody
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: that was a conservative to be labeled a terrorists. That
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: was around January the sixth, Even if you weren't involved
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: in the chaos of January the sixth, That tells you
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: something this government frames people. We now know that at
• 11:49
  Speaker 1: least not one, not two, and you haven't heard about
• 11:53
  Speaker 1: this probably anywhere, not three, not four, but five new
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: whistle blowers have come forward against the Biden family. That's
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: what we know of. It's been the leak now that
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: at least five whistleblowers have come forward to alleged wrongdoing
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: by the Biden family. And connection to business schemes and
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: corresponding cover ups. The whistleblowers are in addition to the
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: multitude of witnesses that Republican Members of Congress have interviewed
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: behind closed doors. The whistleblowers range from an IRS agent
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: to an Obama Administration sonographer, encompassing alleged corruption in Ukraine
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: and Mexico along with the listen carefully, the FBI, and
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: you ready for this the Department of Justice. You're noticing
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: the theme here, Number one, Chuck Grassley says a whistleblowers
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: say the FBI has evidence that Joe Biden was involved
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: in the family business schemes center. Grassley, who testified before
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: the House's News Select Subcommittee on Political Weaponsation, said the
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: whistle whistle blower disclosures indicate the FBI had evidence that
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden is very aware of the family business schemes,
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: the statement that directly contradicts the President of the United
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: States of America. Grassley said, the whistleblower disclosures make clear,
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: quote the FBI is within its possession very significant, impactful
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: and volume is evidence with respect to potential criminal conduct
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: by Hunter and James Biden. It is unclear why the
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: FBI has not acted on the alleged evidence. The FBI
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: is in possession of Hunter Biden's infamous Laptop from Hell,
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: which has caused many to dub the Biden family the
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: Biden crime family. Former Hunter Biden partner Tony Bobolinski had
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: a meeting with Senate investigators to turnover more information evidence.
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: That's number two. Tony Bobolinsky, who's that former business associate
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: of Hunter Biden, personally met with Joe Biden multiple times
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: and Hunter Biden in twenty seventeen for an hour to
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: discuss the Biden's family business plans for a Chinese communist
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: energy deal. That deal appeared to have been have never
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: been finalized. The deal included ten percent held for h
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: for the big guy Hunter for his dad, who Bobolinski
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: said over and over again was Joe Biden. We discussed
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: the Biden's history, the Biden family business plans with the Chinese,
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: which with which he was plainly familiar at the highest level.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: Bible Lensky told reporters back in twenty twenty about the
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: business meeting with Joe Biden. You may remember that Tony
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: Bobolinski came forward right before the election to blow the whistle.
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: And what did the media do. Nothing, didn't do anything,
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: made sure that they acted like it didn't even happen.
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: And the reason why they didn't have to cover Tony
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: Bobolinski and what Tony Bobolinsky said was actually very simple.
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: Tony Bobolinski and what he was talking about dealt with
• 15:09
  Speaker 1: that thing. You know what that thing was the laptop,
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: the same laptop that they lied to you about and
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: said wasn't real. So therefore they didn't have to cover it.
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: But he came forward and this is what he said.
• 15:21
  Speaker 2: Gage in our country's armed forces. Since leading the Navy,
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: I've been involved in various successful businesses, both in this
• 15:29
  Speaker 2: country and abroad. I'm making the statement so set the
• 15:34
  Speaker 2: record straight about the involvement of the Biden family, Vice
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: President Biden, his brother Jim Biden, and his son Hunter
• 15:41
  Speaker 2: Biden in dealings with the Chinese. I've heard Joe Biden
• 15:47
  Speaker 2: say that he's never discussed business with Hunter.
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: That is false. That is false. We know it's false.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: We have documentation and proof that that is false. And
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: that's part of what he would saying. Bob Alynsky also
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: handed over the intelligence about the deal to former FBI
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: point man Timothy Tibou, who reportedly buried the information and
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: then actually tried to classify the information as disinformation so
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: no one else could look at it. He's now disgraced
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: and no longer at the FBI. He also has conveyed emails,
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: what's app, chats, agreements, documents, and other evidence to has
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: sent an investigation committee. Was the media doing not talking
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: about any of it? You got an ext White House
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: aid who says the FBI deliberately ignored Joe Biden's role
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: in Ukraine business dealings. A former Obama White House snographer,
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: Mike McCormick, alleged in twenty twenty three that the FBI
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: has ignored Joe Biden's role in the family's foreign influence
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: pedaling conspiracy in Ukraine. McCormick, who told The New York
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: Posts he has relevant information and implicating Joe Biden in
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: the family business affairs in Ukraine, admitted a tip to
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: the FBI in February, McCormick saying never heard back from
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: the FBI, the same law enforcement agency which allegedly quote
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: shut down the investigation to Hunter's abandoned laptop from Hell.
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: According to this former Obama White House staffer, Biden's former
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: National security aid Sullivan total reporters on April fourth, or
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: excuse me, April the twenty first, twenty fourteen, on Air
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: Force two as an anonymous senior administration official that the
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: United States intended to help Ukraine's natural gas industry. Unknown
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: to the public at the time was that Hunter Biden
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: was already on board as a board member of Barisma.
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: Guess what Borisma was just happened to be, a Ukrainian
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: natural gas company. Hunter's position on the board was not
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: disclosed by the company until May of twenty fourteen, nearly
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: a month after Jake Sullivan's statement to reporters. You'd think
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: that'd be enough for the government to do their job.
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: But when you can't trust the government, you can't trust
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: the FBI and the DOJ. Now we know why whistle
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: blower number four that we know about as an IRS
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: whistleblower who says that Biden administration is directly interfering with
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: Hunter's tax fraud probe. In fact, now they've been retaliated
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: against and taken off the job. We're now being told
• 18:28
  Speaker 1: an IRS whistle blower alleged that this year the two
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: Biden administration political appointees within the Justice Department are working
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: vigorously to block charges against Hunter Biden for tax violations
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: against recommendations. In addition, the whistleblower alleges that David Weiss
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: asked to be named as a special counsel in the
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: probe to provide a degree of separation between the probe
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: and Joe Biden. That request was apparently turned down. According
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: to the blower's attorney, his client wishes to speak with
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: Congressional investigators to coroborate his claims of political interference in
• 19:06
  Speaker 1: that probe, which he has reported to the Justice Department's
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: top watchdog, according to the lawyer. Now, before I get
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: into more of this story, I want to say thank
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: you and tell you about our good friends at Augusta
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: Precious Medals. You can get free gold just by learning
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: about gold iras from Augusta Precious Medals. It's important that
• 19:27
  Speaker 1: you know what's going on in this crazy economy and
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: your hard earned savings need protecting from the devalued dollar.
• 19:33
  Speaker 1: Protecting from the devalued dollar, especially if you're close to retirement.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Medals will give you information on how to
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: protect your savings and open a gold IRA. So if
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: you've saved at least one hundred thousand for retirement, call
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: and ask about their ultimate guide to gold iras. I
• 19:49
  Speaker 1: trust Augusta Precious Medals and you can too. They will
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: make sure that you understand what is best for you
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: and your portfolio. There's a reason Money Magazine says they
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: are the best gold IRA company. Get free, goal free
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: information and retirement protection now by calling eight seven seven
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: four gold IRA. That's eight seven seven the number four
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: GOLDRA or Augusta Precious Medals dot com. And then you
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: move on to Joe Biden bribery allegations. This is the
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: one that I think is the most damning right now
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: that people are not talking about Joe Biden and these
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: bribery allegations that were brought to the Justice Department by
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: a whistleblower in twenty eighteen against President Joe Biden, but
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: all the allegations apparently were ignored. A former federal prosecutor
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: revealed last week the second allegation of bribery against Joe
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: Biden involved Hunter Biden's board membership to Barisma. Bud Cummings,
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: a former federal prosecutor, first reported the bribery allegations to
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: then the New York US Attorney Jeff Berman on October
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: four of twenty eight in an email, claiming he had
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: evidence that Joe Biden had exercised influence to protect his
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: son's Ukrainian employer in exchange for payments to Hunter Biden,
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: Devin Archer, and Joe Biden. In the email obtained by
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: the News, Cummings said that Ukraine's then prosecutor wanted to
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: travel to United States to meet with Berman and could
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: produce two John Doe witnesses to corroborate his claims about
• 21:35
  Speaker 1: the Bidens. Despite cummings claims, Berman did not respond. These
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: are all issues for this White House. They're all issues
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: that in a normal world without the corruption of the
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: deep state. And you have to understand something now, the
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: people that have infiltrated the FBI, the people that have
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: inflatate traded the Department of Justice and the CIA, they
• 22:03
  Speaker 1: have to keep their jobs. And the way they do
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: it is by covering up the people that put them there,
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: Covering for the people that gave them their jobs, cover
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: for the people that have helped them rise through the ranks.
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: That's why they're not doing their job. Remember White House
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: Press Secretary having this to say about some of these issues.
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: Listen for topic.
• 22:28
  Speaker 3: With the new Republican majority coming in, the Householver Site
• 22:31
  Speaker 3: Committee is laying out their new investigations and they claim
• 22:34
  Speaker 3: to have evidence that Jill Biden lives to the American
• 22:37
  Speaker 3: people about his involvement in his family's business schemes. Did
• 22:41
  Speaker 3: he So?
• 22:42
  Speaker 4: Look, I've said this before and I'll say it again.
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: House Republicans promised that fighting inflation during the midterms was
• 22:50
  Speaker 4: going to be their number one priority. That's what they
• 22:52
  Speaker 4: said was important to them, and that's what they said
• 22:54
  Speaker 4: that they wanted to do.
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: But instead, I love the dodge there right say, oh,
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: let's talk about inflation. A very simple and basic question
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: was asked the White House Press Sretary and that question
• 23:06
  Speaker 1: was not answered. She then pivoted to inflation because she
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: knows she cannot answer this question because if she does,
• 23:17
  Speaker 1: it's so damning.
• 23:18
  Speaker 4: They're doing is wanting to do an investigation on the
• 23:23
  Speaker 4: President and his family. That is their focus. They don't
• 23:24
  Speaker 4: want to focus on the American people and their family.
• 23:27
  Speaker 4: They want to focus on political division. They want to
• 23:31
  Speaker 4: focus on something that the American people do not want
• 23:35
  Speaker 4: to see as we saw from the midterm elections. Look,
• 23:39
  Speaker 4: I'm not going to get into get into the specifics
• 23:43
  Speaker 4: of any of the oversight here. We have a White
• 23:45
  Speaker 4: House Council that's going to my colleagues.
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: Who are I just wanted you to hear that that
• 23:52
  Speaker 1: is a spend from last like before the Republicans took
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: over the House. They've stuck with us. Well, we care
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: about the America, can people. We don't look at these
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: types of things. We don't waste our time on these
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: types of things. We don't focus on things like this.
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: We are here to help inflation go down. No they're not.
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: They're here to enrich themselves, maximize profits for their criminal activities,
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: and then have the people that they put into positions
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: of power that the DOJ and the FBI cover their
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: aas's And they're doing it and have been doing it
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: for years. So whether it's them lying to you about
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: funds and equipment costs going to Ukraine and then making
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: money for companies that they used to work for, or
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: it's any of what's happening right now in Ukraine with
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: people that were connected to Hunter Biden getting massive amounts
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: of paydays there have been significant number of reports coming
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: out that Zelensky and other oligarchs are pocketing tens of
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: millions of dollars that is coming in an aid to
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: his country. There are clear examples of top leaders in
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: Ukraine's government having their family members staying at five star
• 25:07
  Speaker 1: resorts in Warsaw. And guess who's paying for it? You
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: and I are, apparently through our government aid. That's the
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: problem right now, that's what's happening right now. And these
• 25:21
  Speaker 1: are all paybacks, folks, That's what this is. It's all paybacks,
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: all right. Lastly, please make sure you hit that subscribe
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: button or auto download button wherever you are listening to
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: this podcast right now, and take a moment to write
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: us a five star review. Many on the left have
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: been attacking our podcast, rutting us bad reviews on purpose,
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: So if you would help us fight back by writing
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: us a good review, a five star review, and share
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: this podcast with your family and friends on social media
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: to help us grow. See you back here tomorrow.