Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / BIDEN CRIME FAMILY EXPANDS TO NEW FAMILY MEMBERS GETTING PAID!

Transcript

BIDEN CRIME FAMILY EXPANDS TO NEW FAMILY MEMBERS GETTING PAID! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: Can Joe Biden be impeached for bribery? That is the
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: question that's now being asked because we've got more intel.
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: And it's not just the laptop from Hell, it's the
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: Treasury records that are now showing millions of dollars went
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: from the Biden crime family, or to the Biden crime family,
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: i should say, from China. And let's also not forget
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: the Democrats are the one that set precedent on impeachment.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: Remember they said crimes didn't have to be proven to
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: impeach in that pursuit of impeaching Donald Trump. That was
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: their words. Now, let's talk about what we now know
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: when it comes to the new intel on what happened
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: with this money. All right, so you understand the whole thing.
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Payments have been confirmed as of late Thursday that actually
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: came from a Chinese Communist Party link company, two members
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: of President Joe Biden's family. The amounts are big and
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: this now could actually end up being a criminal case
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: when it comes to bribery. Now, is bribery and impeachable
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: offense under the constitution. That's the question that Congress is
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: going to have to look at. Now, let's talk about
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: the money real quick. So you understand that aspect of this,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: the House Oversight Committee has revealed that in two thousand
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: and seventeen, China State Energy h K Limited. Now, this
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: is a company that I've never talked about before. I've
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: never told you about this before. I want to make
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: that very clear. Okay, this is a company that this
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: is the first time I've ever mentioned this company. So
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: please share this intel with your family and your friends,
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: grab our podcasts, share it on social media wherever you can,
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: wherever you're listening, hit that forward button and share it
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: so they'll understand what happened in here. Now, this China
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: State Energy, and this is the communist Chinese State Energy
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: company h K Limited, sent three million dollars to a
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: company controlled by family associate Robert Walker, who in turn
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: then took that three million dollars and distributed those funds
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: to the members of the Biden crime family. He sent
• 2:27
  Speaker 1: the money to his surviving son Hunter, his brother James,
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: referring to the present, his daughter in law Hallie, and
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: an unknown Biden we now know and again, this all
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: happened in two thousand and seventeen. Hallie is the ex
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: widow of his son Bo Biden who then shacked up
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden just to keep it all in the family.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: They're keeping all the money in the family and other
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: stuff too. State Energy h K Limited was all so
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: linked to CEFE China Energy. Now you've heard about them
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: before in payments that have gone to the Bidens. That
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: chairman of CEFE Energy Ye did business with Hunter Biden directly.
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: Cefee also, we now know, was involved in an abandoned
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: joint venture with a Biden family in which someone referred
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: to as the quote big guy and presumed to be
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: then the former Vice President Joe Biden, was to have
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: a ten percent stake in that company. Now, this is
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: the part where Congress is going to have to decide
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: if this was actually just bribery and a fake business
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: partnership that would allow for the bribes to take place
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: in the money to transfer. CEFE was involved in that
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: abandoned joint venture, right, and they were. They were involved
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: in that abandoned joint venture. But it may be that
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: that joint venture really never was intended to have legs.
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: It may have just been a cover for again bribery.
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: Now it is not clear what goods or what services,
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: if any, were provided in exchange for these multimillion dollar payments. Again,
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: they may have just set up these fake companies and
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: acted like they were going to do business, and in
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: reality it was nothing but a cover story for the
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: bribes to come in. This is the first time we've
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: been able to see financially how this is working and
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: how easily it was for the Bidens to get their
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: hands on countless dollars. Now, Hunter Biden's legal team has
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: now been forced to issue a statement. Their statement now
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: claims that he has engaged in a quote legitimate private
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: business venture with a Chinese company. As part of that
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: joint venture, Hunter received his portion of good faith seed
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: funds which he shared with his uncle James Biden and
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: Hallie Biden, with whom he was involved in at the time,
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: and quote sharing expenses. Again, this is a full blown
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: mafia style crime family. This is no different than what
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: the cartels do down in Mexico. They keep it in
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: the family. This is no different than what you see
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: in Russia, with these oligarchs keeping it the family and
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: with Vladimir Putin giving it to his family and his friends.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: This is what corruption and bribery looks like when you
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: actually see the funds transferring. Now it was not clear
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: what exactly the joint venture was as well. That's another problem,
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: and again Congress is going to now have to ask
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: this question, can you impeach a president for bribery? Because
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: we don't even have a clear picture of what the
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: joint venture was or how it was arranged. We just
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: know that's the alibi, and in fact, Hunter Biden's attorneys
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: confirm that in their statement. Now, let's talk about some
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: other parts of the money here. Hunter Biden's overseas business
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: ventures had been recognized. We now have from these suspicious
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: activity reports and from his laptop as early and travel
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: records as early as twenty fifteen, as a potential conflict
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: of interest for his father. We know that diplomats and
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: journalists questioned Hunter Biden's appointment to the board of the
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: Ukrainian energy company Barisma, where he earned eighty three thousand,
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: three hundred and thirty three dollars a month, despite lacking
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: any relevant experience, not knowing the country, and not knowing
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: their language. The only thing you brought the table was
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: his father was in office in the point man with
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: Ukraine and America's policy. Now, before I get into more
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: of this story, I want to say thank you and
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: tell you about our good friends at the Gust of
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: Precious Medals. They are different because they will even tell
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: you if a gold Ira isn't your answer, they give
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: you just the facts. Now, guess the precious metal is
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: all about protecting your ira and your four oh one k.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: They're great people a great conservative company. They're great people
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: at a great conservative company. They understand right now that
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: it's crazy with our economy and it's extremely important, especially
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: if you're close to retirement, to protect your assets because
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: there's no time to make up losses. So if you've
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: saved one hundred thousand dollars or more, then you should
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: take a look at their free guide and you should
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: really sign up for something that I've done. It's a
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: web conference where you talk to a top individual about
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: gold iras and your four oh one k. Check them
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: out and get the peace of mind that you're protecting
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: your hard earned assets when you get really close to retirement.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: Eight seven seven four the number four gold Ira eight
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: seven seven four Gold Ira or visit them online at
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Metals dot com. Say I sent you and
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: they will pay your fees for up to ten years.
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: That's Augusta Precious Metals dot Com eight seven seven four
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: Gold Ira. Now, when the concerns were raised back in
• 8:17
  Speaker 1: twenty fifteen, just to really let you understand this timeline now, financially,
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: those concerns were brushed aside by Democrats, including Barack Obama's
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: White House, the Vice president office at the time, Joe
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: Biden's office, and the issue was never resolved because they
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: basically just deferred and said it doesn't matter. We also
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: know that Hunter Biden was also connected to other foreign
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: businesses and associates with his father, including Chinese communists associates
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: as well. Now, the criminal statue of bribery describes giving
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: anything of value to an official to influence him or
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: her in performing any official act. The fact that the
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: thing of value might have flowed to Biden's friends and
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: family rather than directly to Biden himself would not absolve him,
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: based on a court opinion, and there's evidence that the
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: senior Biden now our President Joe Biden, benefited greatly from
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: his family's gains. China's also desired to influence is clear,
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: which even again brings up more of a simple connecting
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: in the dots of what bribery is. It's less clear
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: what Biden did or did not do to protect and
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: or to help China. Here's the other thing. Democrats are
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: the ones that are going to get themselves in trouble
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: when it comes to precedent here because throughout both Donald
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: Trump's impeachments, both and those investigations and trials in Congress,
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: it was not necessary that a criminal statue be violated
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: for the president to be impeach or removed. They said,
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: over and over and over and over again. You don't
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: have to prove a crime. We can just accuse him
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: of a crime. Can you impeach a president for doing this?
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: Let me get back to what they say. Many legal
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: scholars say that a president can be impeached only for
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: acts committed after taking office. But that's not what the
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: Democrats did with Donald Trump. Democrats undermined that standard, not
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: only by arguing that Trump could be impeached for, you know,
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: the perception of collusion. They did this as soon as
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: he took office. Remember, they oh, well, he's done things
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: in the past. We want to get rid of him.
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: We're gonna impeach him. We have no influence, we have
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: no nothing about Russia collusion, but we're gonna say did
• 10:53
  Speaker 1: it anyway, We're gonna ppeach him for that. Remember that's
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: what they did. Then they had that second Senate trial
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: for Trump even after he left office in twenty twenty one,
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: because of what happened on January sixth. And in this case,
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: it could be well argued when it comes to Biden
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: that his foreign policy is an ongoing act affected by
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: his past financial benefits, which would be a far stronger
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: case than we'd ever heard about anything that Donald Trump did.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: That was, by the way, they were lying about the
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: entire time, So he didn't do any of it. But
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: who cares? Now, how would you argue this case? How
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: would you put it forward? Right? While bribery is one
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: of the ways, the other is treason, and treason is
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: mentioned explicitly by the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Because
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: if you're working on behalf of China instead of the
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: United States of America, and you're doing things on behalf
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: of China or Russia or Ukraine instead of doing them
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: on behalf of the United States of America, and your
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: policies being influenced by how much money there's sending you.
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: Is that treason? You're gonna have to ask those in
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: Congress that they believe that it is. Do I think
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: it is absolutely now Here's the other thing. Prior to Thursday,
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: the evidence existed on Hunter Biden's laptop. We did know that.
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: We did not, however, have the evidence that has now
• 12:21
  Speaker 1: emerged from the US Treasury Department to back it up.
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: This is going to be a problem for Joe Biden,
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: for James Biden, for Hunter Biden, for Halle Biden, for
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: everybody that's been getting paid. The House Oversight Committee should
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: turn its investigation, in my opinion, into a full impeachment
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: inquiry based on what we now have from the US
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: Treasury Department. I think that's what should happen here, and
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: I think there's many others that would agree with me
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: that these are the things that we've been asking about
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: for years. And is the President of the United States
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: of America compromise? At this point you would have to think,
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: of course, that he has compromised. How could you not
• 13:07
  Speaker 1: say that he is compromised based on what we have learned.
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: This is a significant amount of money, millions and millions
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: of dollars, and I think you can make the argument
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: that there's no way in hell that James Biden or
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden would ever have gotten these contracts or Halle
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: Biden with China if it wasn't for their father. James Comer,
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: He said two weeks ago he subpoened the bank records
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: for three hundred Biden businesses. And this is just the beginning. Okay,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: this is just the beginning. I also want to remind you,
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: let's go back to two thousand and nineteen, and I
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: want you to hear what the President had to say
• 13:57
  Speaker 1: about his family back then in two thousand and nine.
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: I don't know what he was doing. I know he
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: was on the board. I found out he was on
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: the board after he was on the board, and that
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: was it. And there's nobody knows a lot of time.
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: Isn't this something you want to get to the bottom of. No,
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: because I trust my son. No, because I trust my son.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: So we're supposed to believe if you go back to
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden and his own words when he was doing
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: that interview with Axios on HBO in twenty nineteen, that
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: his son randomly lands a seven figure job in Ukraine
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: and is serving on the board, and he expects you
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: to believe that he didn't even know about it, had
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: no clue, didn't even know about it until his son
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: was already on the board. Remember he says he never
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: talks about his son's business dealings. We also know that's
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: a lie from the laptop and from the audio recordings.
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: So should we be calling our senators and our congressmen
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: and saying to them, hey, it's time for you to
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: move and do your job and move for impeachment. Should
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: the House side do this based on these Treasury reports? Yes?
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: And is this because I want revenge? No, I want
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: to make that very clear. This is not because I
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: want some sort of revenge. Okay, this is not because
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: I want some sort of revenge. This is because there
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: is clear evidence to two different things here, treason and bribery.
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: This president, I think has been bribed. This president could
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: be acting on behalf of China and Russia and Ukraine
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: in our policies now because of the money that he
• 15:41
  Speaker 1: received in the past. That is a problem. Specifically, you
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: just have to look at the timeline. March first, twenty seventeen.
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: This is less than two months after Joe Biden leaves
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: the Vice presidential office. And this guy, Robinson Walker LLC.
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: Receives three million dollar wire transfer from the Chinese Communist company.
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: Then he wires a million sixty five thousand to a
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: company associated with James Gillier. Who is that James Gillier
• 16:15
  Speaker 1: is a business partner of Hunter Biden and was involved
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: in foreign transactions of the Biden crime family. What happens
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: after that, Biden's family members and their companies began getting
• 16:27
  Speaker 1: paid in receiving incremental payments over a period of approximately
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: three months, and the total money transfer added up to
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: more than one million, sixty five thousand, six hundred ninety
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: two dollars. Who gets the money, Well, the Biden crime
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: family has expanded. As I mentioned earlier, the money, the people,
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: the family members who receive the money from this account.
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: Of this total of a million, sixty five thousand, nine
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: hundred and sixty dollars that we know of James Biden
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: bank account check, Hunter Biden Chiching, Hallie Biden Chiching, and
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: a new person of interest in the Biden business family's scheme,
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: then we also know a fourth bank account identified as
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: an unknown Biden Chiching also received money. These bank records
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: show that the Biden family received approximately one third of
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: the money obtained from that China wire directly, and ultimately,
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: the American people deserve to know and deserve transparency in
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: how the hell does Hallie Biden, Joe Biden, James Biden
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: and all them do a business together that none of
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: us have ever heard of before? How does Hallie Biden
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: get paid big money while Hunter Biden's getting big money,
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: while James getting big money, and while the big guys
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: getting money. That is the question. But what I do
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: know is a Biden crime family has just expanded now.
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: China's State Energy HK Limited sent three million dollars to
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: a company controlled by family associate Robert Walker, who in
• 18:06
  Speaker 1: turn distributed funds to members of the Biden family. And
• 18:11
  Speaker 1: we now know that the number of Bidens that are
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: getting money from these transactions has expanded. How shocked are
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: you by this revelation? Well, I'm sorry to say, I'm
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: not shocked at all. We keep seeing every day, every week,
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: more and more evidence of Biden family corruption, and in
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: particular evidence of the Biden family being in business with
• 18:35
  Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist government. If you look at what the
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: House Oversight Committee is released and what the records show.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: According to that committee, it starts with the fact that
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: I'm in March first, twenty seventeen, which is less than
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: two months after Biden Lee's public office. Robinson Walker LLC,
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: and this fellow, rob Walker is a close associate of Biden,
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: receives a three million dollar wire from State Energy HK Limited,
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: which is a Chinese company. Now, what does Robinson Walk
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: Grell LC do? It then wires one million, sixty five
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: thousand to a company that is associated with James Gillier.
• 19:17
  Speaker 1: Who is James Gillier. James Gillier was a business partner
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: of Hunter Biden and was involved in foreign transactions with
• 19:25
  Speaker 1: a Biden family And what happened after that? After that,
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: Biden family members and their companies began receiving incremental payments
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: over a period of approximately three months. How much were
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: those payments One million, sixty five thousand, six hundred ninety two.
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: So to underscore that, the amount that's transferred to James
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: Gillier is a million, sixty five thousand. The amount that
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: then goes to Biden family members is a million, sixty
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: five thousand, and an additional six hundred ninety two dollars
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: I don't know what the six hundred ninety two is.
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: So that fact is there that about a third of
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: the money that apparently came from China went to the
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: Biden family. But fact number two, the Oversight Committee mentions,
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: is the number of people receiving this cash has grown.
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: So according to the Oversight Committee, James Biden, which is
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden's brother, receives some of the money. Hunter Biden,
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: who we all know, receives some of the money. And
• 20:23
  Speaker 1: then a new person of interest, Hallie Biden. Now Hallie
• 20:26
  Speaker 1: Biden was the widow of Joe Biden's son Biden. She
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: receives some of the money. And then there's a fourth
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: bank account that is identified as an unknown Biden who
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: also received some of the money. And it's not clear
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: from what the House is released, and I don't think
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: they know yet whether this fourth Biden is one of
• 20:50
  Speaker 1: the three already listed James, Hunter or Hallie, or whether
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: it's someone else entirely. But what we now know is
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: the number of Biden's receiving cash and cash that appears
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: to be funneled directly from the Chinese Communist government has
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: grown substantially in the last twenty four hours. The question
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: that I think so many Americans want to know right
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: now is Okay, at what point do we just call
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: this straight up bribery and corruption? And the reason why
• 21:20
  Speaker 1: is there's no indication that James Biden and Halle Biden
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: did business together. And we're talking about legitimate business or
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: the new person of interest with Hunter Biden and with
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: the President. And at some point you ask, Okay, are
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: these people doing legitimate businesses or could they even claim
• 21:41
  Speaker 1: center that they were doing legitimate business when clearly their
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: resumes are completely different, And you put it Halle in there,
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: and the question becomes, at what point do we just
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: say this is a money laundering scheme in essence to
• 21:56
  Speaker 1: give it to all the family members? Well, it certainly
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: looks like get on the face, I'm not aware of
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: any facts justifying work that Hallie Biden might have done
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: for for the Chinese Communist government or for this Chinese company.
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: You know, Hunter Biden led the effort to try to
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: get this money from China, and he received the lion's
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: share of it. His experience with China seems quite limited
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: other than the fact that Daddy was vice president and
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: China I believe thought it was profitable to send money
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: to the Biden family, including as Hunter Biden's laptop famously
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: says ten percent for the big guy, that obviously being
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden. And we now have multiple witnesses who have
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: testified that the big guy was was Joe Biden. Look,
• 22:48
  Speaker 1: this is similar, but to an even greater degree. The
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: inference that was raised by Hunter Biden's working for Baris
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: men getting over a million dollars for Baris Barisma is
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: the Ukrainian natural gas company. Hunter Biden does not speak Ukrainian.
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: To the best of by knowledge, there's no evidence that
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: he does. Hunter Biden did not know a damned thing
• 23:10
  Speaker 1: about oil and gas, and so it raised an obvious question,
• 23:13
  Speaker 1: why would a Ukrainian company pay someone who knew nothing
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: about what they did over a million bucks? Generally companies
• 23:20
  Speaker 1: don't do that. If you pay someone a million bucks,
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: you think you're getting something for it. That raises the
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: inference at the payment. The only thing Hunter Biden added
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: to the equation was Daddy. That now is made even
• 23:36
  Speaker 1: more likely by the escalating number of Biden family members
• 23:41
  Speaker 1: who for the Chinese Communist government. Presumably we're doing even
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: less than Hunter Biden was doing. For Barissma. All of
• 23:49
  Speaker 1: which gets back to something we've discussed on this podcast before,
• 23:53
  Speaker 1: which is the Department of Justice has appointed a special
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: counsel that is investigating number one, the classified documents that
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden had littered around seemingly every home he owns,
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: and we've talked about in this podcast before that special
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: counsel's investigation and also the DOJ's investigation into Hunter Biden
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: that they have leaked vigorously to the press. Both of
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: those we will know whether DJ is shilling for the
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: White House. By answering one question, do those investigations examined
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: directly corruption by Joe Biden, the big guy, the president,
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: or do they do everything they can to shield off
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: the big guy and stay focused on potential crimes committed
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: only by down river Biden family members. If DOJ turns
• 24:52
  Speaker 1: a blind eye to the big guy, that means the
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: Biden Department of Justice is an active participant in the
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: cover up, and we're going to know that sooner rather
• 25:00
  Speaker 1: than leader. There's another aspect of this, and that is
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: it's not even clear with this wire transfer, with this
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: three million dollars in an over a million going the
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: Biden family, what goods or services. And I say this,
• 25:15
  Speaker 1: everybody listened to this. If any were provided in exchange
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: for these payments. Now, when this hit, it obviously spooked
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's team because they usually don't put out much
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: and Hunter Biden's legal team issued a statement claiming that
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: he had engaged in a quote legitimate private business venture
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: with a Chinese company. As part of that joint venture,
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: Hunter received his portion of good faith seed funds which
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: he shared with his uncle James and Hallie Biden, with
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: whom he was involved with at a time, and sharing
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: expenses quote unquote. They're not even saying what the company
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: would have done. You would assume and you're again you're
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: a lawyer, you would know this. This is a statement
• 26:06
  Speaker 1: that I think opens them up to even more problems
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: because they can't tell you what they actually did. Well,
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: I think that's right, and you would think that they
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: would want to put their best story forward, they would
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: want to explain something. And look, I just asked folks
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: to ask yourself at home, have you ever had anyone
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: pay you a million bucks? And if so, and there's
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: some people who have, did you have to do something
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: for it? I mean, in your experience do people usually
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: get paid a million bucks for doing nothing? Now let
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: me ask a second question, when was the last time
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: you got paid a million bucks from the Chinese Communist
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: government or a company owned and controlled by the Chinese
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: Communist government. Does that raise a different set of questions?
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: And on top of that, if you happen to be
• 26:52
  Speaker 1: maybe we've got a podcast lister who has received a
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: million bucks from the Chinese Communist government, although I doubt it,
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: but if they have, it's worth asking was your father
• 27:02
  Speaker 1: at the time or had he recently been the Vice
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: President of the United States and making public policy decisions
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: directly impacting China at some point, If the Chinese Communist
• 27:14
  Speaker 1: government is essentially dropping off paper bags filled with rolls
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: of fresh hundred dollar bills to every Biden family member
• 27:23
  Speaker 1: they can find, if that doesn't start to look like bribery,
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: I don't know what does. But I am glad that
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: the House Oversight Committee is examining this. I'm glad they're
• 27:35
  Speaker 1: putting out the facts. I assume the corporate media will
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: utterly ignore it because the corporate media no longer engages
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: in journalism. They no longer report on facts. If you
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: want to learn facts, you have to listen to sources
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: like this podcast that just lays out the facts. You
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: can also watch Fox News or Newsmax to get some
• 27:53
  Speaker 1: of these facts. But I'm going to hold my breath
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: for CNN or MSNBC or abccs NBC to cover these
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: facts because it's inconvenient to their political narrative. Now that
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: it was obviously only a portion of the conversation that
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: I had with Cynator Ted Cruz, if you want to
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: hear the entire conversation, make sure you download Verdict with
• 28:14
  Speaker 1: Cytor Ted Cruise. I get to co host out with him.
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: He had a lot more to say about this subject,
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: so make sure you grab that as well, and make
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: sure you please share this podcast with your family and friends.
• 28:24
  Speaker 1: Write us a five star review, and I'll see it
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: back here tomorrow.