Latest / Connecting the Dots / Generational AI Angst, Kernel Security Overload, and Corporate Crypto Stacking

Transcript

Generational AI Angst, Kernel Security Overload, and Corporate Crypto Stacking · Connecting the Dots

• 0:00
  Today's tech news moves fast, but understanding
• 0:03
  it shouldn't be hard. That's why Snarfle Solutions
• 0:06
  Group brings you Connecting the Dots, where we
• 0:09
  break down what's happening in tech and why it
• 0:11
  matters to you. Now, let's dive in with your
• 0:14
  hosts. To Connecting the Dots, I'm Alex. And
• 0:18
  I'm Morgan. And it is Monday, May 18th, 2026.
• 0:22
  If you step outside here in Sacramento right
• 0:24
  now, it is just an absolutely gorgeous day, you
• 0:27
  know? Oh, totally. I mean, we've got sunny skies,
• 0:29
  it's 87 degrees, maybe a perfectly crisp breeze
• 0:32
  blowing at, I think... 12 to 17 miles per hour.
• 0:37
  Sounds pretty ideal. Right. But then you check
• 0:39
  your phone, feeling great about the day, only
• 0:42
  to see the national map is completely lit up.
• 0:44
  There are 388 active U .S. weather alerts right
• 0:48
  now. That's a lot. Yeah, 163 of them are tearing
• 0:51
  right across land. And there's this bizarre,
• 0:55
  almost jarring disconnect between our localized
• 0:58
  calm and that macro level chaos. And honestly,
• 1:01
  that is exactly what the global markets and really
• 1:02
  the broader tech landscape are projecting It's
• 1:05
  a profound disconnect for sure. I mean you look
• 1:07
  at the financial dashboards and we are mirroring
• 1:09
  that exact turbulence. We saw the Dow close out
• 1:11
  Friday taking a massive 404 point hit. Yeah settling
• 1:15
  down at 49 ,526. The S &P dropped 36 points to
• 1:20
  7 ,408. Even Bitcoin is caught in the downdraft,
• 1:24
  hovering right around 77 ,279. The data is just
• 1:28
  flashing red across the board. And yet we're
• 1:30
  all supposed to just, you know, grab our morning
• 1:32
  coffee and pretend the ground isn't shaking beneath
• 1:34
  us. Exactly. I mean, I guess if you're a sports
• 1:36
  fan in Northern California, you can find a tiny
• 1:38
  slice of that sunny local optimism. The San Francisco
• 1:42
  Giants. crushed the athletics ten to one yesterday.
• 1:45
  Adrian Howser pitched an absolute gem in that
• 1:47
  one. He really did. And the Sacramento Kings
• 1:50
  had the night off so nobody's nursing a playoff
• 1:52
  heartbreak this morning at least. Always a silver
• 1:54
  lining. Right. But you really can't ignore the
• 1:57
  broader siren going off. When I look at the stack
• 2:00
  of sources for today's show, I don't just see
• 2:02
  a collection of tech updates. I see a massive
• 2:05
  societal weather alert. Oh, that's a great way
• 2:07
  to frame it. We have this localized sunshine,
• 2:09
  but a massive storm of friction as technology
• 2:12
  moves at warp speed and human systems are just
• 2:15
  kind of buckling, trying to keep up. Friction
• 2:17
  is it's really the perfect lens for what we need
• 2:20
  to unpack today, because when technology advances
• 2:23
  linearly. society can stretch and adapt. Right.
• 2:27
  We just naturally adjust. Exactly. But we are
• 2:30
  currently in an era of exponential acceleration.
• 2:33
  The friction we are seeing in today's stories,
• 2:35
  it isn't just growing pains, it's the sound of
• 2:38
  traditional human systems literally grinding
• 2:41
  their gears as they try to process this velocity.
• 2:45
  Yeah, whether that's the labor market, open source
• 2:47
  software communities, or traditional finance,
• 2:49
  it's all grinding. It really is. Well, before
• 2:51
  we look closer at exactly where those gears are
• 2:53
  grinding the loudest, let's take a quick break.
• 2:56
  Today's episode is brought to you by Strong Coffee,
• 2:58
  the premium instant coffee that tastes like a
• 3:00
  traditional brew but is packed with 15 grams
• 3:02
  of protein, MCTs, and adaptogens like ashwagandha.
• 3:05
  Get clean, sustained energy without the jitters.
• 3:08
  Use promo code SNARFL for 20 % off at strongcoffeecompany
• 3:12
  .com. All right, so getting into the real meat
• 3:14
  of the friction here, we should start with the
• 3:15
  very real, very vocal fears of the next generation
• 3:19
  entering the workforce. Yeah. This story is wild,
• 3:22
  so over the weekend, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt
• 3:25
  stood at a podium to deliver a commencement speech
• 3:28
  at the University of Arizona. And commencement
• 3:31
  speeches are historically these incredibly safe,
• 3:34
  platitude -heavy rituals, you know? Exactly.
• 3:37
  But Schmidt was repeatedly, intensely booed by
• 3:40
  the graduating class. Which is Just a striking
• 3:43
  cultural indicator. I mean, you don't boo at
• 3:45
  your graduation unless the anxiety has reached
• 3:47
  an absolute boiling point. No, you really don't.
• 3:50
  And what makes this so compelling is the actual
• 3:52
  trajectory of Schmidt's speech. He actually started
• 3:55
  with an incredibly self -aware reflection. He
• 3:58
  brought up the fact that back in 1982, Time magazine
• 4:00
  didn't pick a human for person of the year. They
• 4:03
  picked the computer. Oh, right. I remember that.
• 4:05
  Yeah. And he traced that evolution up to the
• 4:07
  smartphone. And frankly, he offered a rather
• 4:10
  stunning concession for someone who spent a decade
• 4:12
  running the world's most powerful search engine.
• 4:14
  What did he say? He openly admitted that these
• 4:16
  platforms democratized knowledge, but simultaneously
• 4:19
  degraded the public square and rewarded outrage.
• 4:23
  Wow. I mean, he practically confessed that the
• 4:25
  industry accidentally built a polarization machine.
• 4:28
  Basically, yeah. But the crowd didn't truly turn
• 4:32
  on him until he pivoted to artificial intelligence.
• 4:35
  The booze swelled so loudly he actually had to
• 4:38
  pause and say I can hear you. That's rough He
• 4:41
  tried to validate their anxiety. He called their
• 4:43
  fears rational Acknowledging the feeling that
• 4:46
  the future is already written that jobs are evaporating
• 4:49
  and that the climate and politics are fracturing
• 4:51
  But then his ultimate advice was essentially,
• 4:54
  you know, don't panic just go out there and shape
• 4:57
  the unwritten future of AI. And that advice right
• 5:00
  there is precisely where the friction ignites.
• 5:03
  We have to look at the economic reality those
• 5:05
  students are graduating into. Right, because
• 5:07
  they are watching companies like Klarna and IBM
• 5:09
  actively execute AI -related layoffs. Exactly.
• 5:12
  And crucially, those layoffs are targeting the
• 5:15
  exact entry -level rote -task jobs that recent
• 5:19
  graduates historically rely on to get a foothold
• 5:21
  in an industry. The traditional corporate ladder
• 5:23
  is literally missing its first three rungs. It
• 5:26
  really is. A recent Pew Research study actually
• 5:29
  confirms this whole vibe, showing half of Americans
• 5:32
  are now more concerned than excited about AI.
• 5:36
  The graduates aren't protesting a hypothetical
• 5:38
  technology. They're protesting their immediate
• 5:40
  obsolescence. Now, to be fair and look at the
• 5:43
  full picture of that friction, the AI anxiety
• 5:46
  wasn't the only fuel for the crowd's reaction
• 5:49
  in the stadium. Right, there are other factors
• 5:51
  at play. Yeah, some of the protests were actually
• 5:53
  pre -planned over sexual assault allegations
• 5:55
  made against Schmidt last year. And just to be
• 5:58
  completely clear on the facts there, an attorney
• 6:00
  for Schmidt has categorically called those accusations
• 6:04
  Fabricated right and a judge recently ordered
• 6:06
  the suit to be settled through arbitration in
• 6:08
  March Exactly and the University of Arizona for
• 6:11
  its part stood firmly by their invitation pointing
• 6:13
  to his extraordinary philanthropic work and his
• 6:16
  legacy at Google But you know even with that
• 6:19
  complex backdrop the moment he brought up AI
• 6:22
  and job displacement the tone Undeniably shifted
• 6:25
  to a much broader economic panic It definitely
• 6:28
  did. And we know this is a broader trend because
• 6:31
  the sources show it happening elsewhere. Just
• 6:34
  earlier this month, a real estate executive named
• 6:36
  Gloria Caulfield faced similar boos at a University
• 6:39
  of Central Florida commencement. Just for bringing
• 6:42
  up AI. Yeah, just for calling AI the next industrial
• 6:45
  revolution. But then, contrast that with NVIDIA
• 6:48
  CEO Jensen Huang at Carnegie Mellon last week,
• 6:52
  he struck a completely different, much more optimistic
• 6:54
  chord. What was his angle? He told graduates,
• 6:57
  AI is not likely to replace you, but someone
• 7:01
  using AI better than you might. He framed it
• 7:04
  as a tool for empowerment. rather than an autonomous
• 7:07
  replacement. Okay, wait, let me jump in on this
• 7:09
  whole shape the future advice Schmidt was giving
• 7:11
  because it feels incredibly hollow to me. How
• 7:14
  so? I mean, it's telling a crowd of anxious debt
• 7:17
  laden 20 somethings to simply shape AI, like
• 7:20
  telling passengers on a runaway train that they
• 7:22
  just need to steer better. They don't have their
• 7:24
  hands on the controls. That captures the power
• 7:27
  asymmetry perfectly. I mean, you have tech billionaires
• 7:30
  who command the massive server farms, the venture
• 7:33
  capital and the foundational models, the actual
• 7:36
  levers of the future. Exactly. And they are standing
• 7:39
  at a podium telling entry level workers who feel
• 7:41
  entirely replaceable by these algorithms that
• 7:44
  the responsibility to govern this technology
• 7:46
  belongs to the graduating class. It feels to
• 7:49
  those students like the architects of a disruptive
• 7:52
  force are abdicating the responsibility of managing
• 7:55
  its fallout. It is the ultimate feeling of powerlessness.
• 7:59
  And here is what I find fascinating as we move
• 8:01
  to the next part of today's deep dive. You might
• 8:04
  think this feeling of being overwhelmed by AI
• 8:06
  is restricted to non -technical folks like those
• 8:09
  grads. But it's really not. No. The very engineers
• 8:12
  who maintain our core software infrastructure
• 8:15
  are buckling under the exact same weight. This
• 8:18
  takes us directly into the world of Linux. And
• 8:20
  we aren't talking about some niche hobby project
• 8:23
  here. The Linux kernel is the absolute bedrock
• 8:26
  of the modern internet. Right. It runs the servers,
• 8:28
  the smartphones, the cloud infrastructure. Everything.
• 8:32
  And Linus Torbalds, the creator and primary maintainer,
• 8:36
  used a routine post literally just a standard
• 8:39
  announcement for Release Candidate 4 of Linux
• 8:41
  7 .1 to wave a massive red flag about AI. He
• 8:45
  said the project's security mailing list has
• 8:47
  become almost entirely unmanageable. And the
• 8:50
  reason why is almost darkly comedic. It really
• 8:52
  is. Security researchers are all using the exact
• 8:55
  same commercially available AI tools to scan
• 8:58
  the Linux code for vulnerabilities. So what happens?
• 9:01
  They all find the exact same bugs and just flood
• 9:04
  the mailing list with duplicate reports. Torvalds
• 9:07
  was merciless in his critique. He called it pointless
• 9:09
  churn and make believe work. And honestly, if
• 9:13
  you think about the mechanics of how AI works,
• 9:15
  his frustration makes total sense. Right, because
• 9:17
  AI is an exceptional pattern recognition engine.
• 9:20
  It can scan millions of lines of code in seconds.
• 9:22
  But it lacks systemic context. Furthermore, as
• 9:25
  Torvalds pointed out, if an off -the -shelf AI
• 9:27
  tool found a bug, that bug is by definition no
• 9:31
  longer a secret. Oh, that's true. Anyone with
• 9:33
  the tool could find it. Exactly. So treating
• 9:36
  these automated flags like highly sensitive zero
• 9:39
  -day security disclosures, is just a colossal
• 9:42
  waste of time for the human maintainers. They
• 9:44
  have to sift through the spam, identify the duplicates,
• 9:47
  and explain that the issue was already patched
• 9:49
  a month ago. You know, when I read Torvald's
• 9:52
  post, I instantly pictured this scenario. These
• 9:55
  AI bug hunters are acting like overly enthusiastic
• 9:58
  high school hall monitors. OK, I love this analogy.
• 10:01
  Right. Like they bought a spilled soda on the
• 10:04
  floor. They sprint to the principal's office,
• 10:06
  kick open the door and scream. There's a spill
• 10:08
  in hallway B. Yep. But then when the principal
• 10:10
  hands them a mop to clean it up, they cross their
• 10:13
  arms and say, oh, I don't know how to mop. I
• 10:15
  just use my tools to point out the spills. That
• 10:17
  is exactly what is happening. If AI makes it
• 10:20
  infinitely easier to find problems but doesn't
• 10:23
  actually provide the contextual intelligence
• 10:25
  to fix them, how do these open source communities
• 10:27
  survive the flood of this so -called help? Well,
• 10:31
  his blunt advice was exactly that. Pick up the
• 10:33
  mop. He told developers to read the documentation,
• 10:36
  understand the architecture, and submit an actual
• 10:39
  patch that adds real value on top of what the
• 10:42
  AI found. Don't just be a drive -by reporter.
• 10:44
  Exactly. Now, to be fair, fellow kernel maintainer
• 10:47
  Greg Crow -Hartman did recently note that AI
• 10:50
  is becoming an increasingly useful tool for the
• 10:52
  open source community overall. Sure, had his
• 10:54
  place. But Torvalds is highlighting a severe
• 10:57
  bottleneck. The human capacity to triage machine
• 11:01
  output. And because human triage doesn't scale,
• 11:04
  developers are being forced to build defensive
• 11:06
  automated walls. Which brings up the Anubis system
• 11:09
  from our sources. This absolutely blew my mind.
• 11:11
  It's so clever. We are seeing infrastructure
• 11:13
  breaking under the weight of AI bots constantly
• 11:16
  scraping data and website administrators are
• 11:18
  deploying this Anubis tool to fight back using
• 11:21
  a proof -of -work scheme. Yeah, for anyone who
• 11:23
  remembers the early days of fighting email spam,
• 11:27
  Anubis is very similar to a concept called Hashcash.
• 11:30
  But instead of fighting spam emails, it's fighting
• 11:33
  aggressive AI web scrapers that are trying to
• 11:36
  ingest the entire internet to train their models.
• 11:39
  But how does a proof -of -work scheme actually
• 11:41
  stop a scraper? Walk me through the mechanism.
• 11:45
  It's brilliant in its simplicity. It relies on
• 11:47
  a mathematical process called hashing. Think
• 11:49
  of it like a computational tollbooth that hands
• 11:51
  out a massive Sudoku puzzle. Okay. a Sudoku puzzle.
• 11:55
  Right. When a browser tries to access a website
• 11:57
  protected by Anubis, the server demands that
• 11:59
  the visitor's computer solve this complex math
• 12:01
  puzzle before it loads the page. Now, if you
• 12:04
  are a human reading an article, your laptop's
• 12:07
  processor solves that single puzzle in a fraction
• 12:10
  of a millisecond. You never even notice it. Right.
• 12:12
  It's a completely invisible delay for me. But
• 12:14
  imagine you were an AI company's automated scraping
• 12:17
  bot, and your goal is to hit 10 ,000 web pages
• 12:20
  every single second. Suddenly, You have to solve
• 12:23
  10 ,000 Sudoku puzzles a second. Those fractions
• 12:27
  of a millisecond compound massively. It requires
• 12:30
  enormous processing power, which burns a ton
• 12:33
  of electricity, which translates to a massive
• 12:35
  server bill for the AI company. That is incredible,
• 12:38
  so it doesn't block the bot by recognizing it.
• 12:40
  No, it simply turns a math problem into an insurmountable
• 12:43
  economic wall. It makes the act of scraping too
• 12:47
  expensive to be viable. So they are fighting
• 12:49
  infinitely scalable automation with the brutal
• 12:52
  physics of computing costs? It's a fascinating
• 12:55
  placeholder solution, but it perfectly illustrates
• 12:58
  the friction we've been talking about. You have
• 13:01
  graduates feeling socially friction burned by
• 13:03
  AI, and you have top tier developers feeling
• 13:05
  technically friction burned by it. The human
• 13:07
  systems are maxing out. They are completely redlining.
• 13:10
  But while all this human infrastructure is buckling,
• 13:13
  Capital is doing what it always does. It is fleeing
• 13:16
  to a system that can't be overwhelmed by bots.
• 13:19
  And that brings us to the staggering financial
• 13:21
  maneuverings of strategy. This is where the narrative
• 13:24
  shifts from friction to pure unstoppable momentum.
• 13:28
  While the rest of the world is figuring out how
• 13:30
  to survive the AI storm, strategy has turned
• 13:33
  its corporate balance sheet into an absolute
• 13:35
  vacuum cleaner for Bitcoin. And let's look at
• 13:38
  the sheer scale of what they just pulled off.
• 13:40
  Between May 11th and May 17th, Strategy acquired
• 13:43
  an additional 24 ,869 Bitcoin. Just unbelievable
• 13:48
  numbers. They dropped about $2 .01 billion in
• 13:51
  a single week, paying an average of roughly $80
• 13:53
  ,985 per coin. That single purchase pushes their
• 13:58
  total holdings to 843 ,738 Bitcoin. Which represents
• 14:03
  4 % of the total global supply of Bitcoin that
• 14:06
  will ever exist. Let's just sit with that for
• 14:08
  a second. Their total spend so far is $63 .87
• 14:11
  billion, with a blended average cost of $75 ,700
• 14:15
  per coin. And at the current market price, as
• 14:18
  we mentioned earlier, that stash is worth well
• 14:20
  north of $67 billion. There's just an ocean of
• 14:22
  capital. To understand how they're pulling this
• 14:24
  off, we have to demystify the financial engine
• 14:26
  they've built. They aren't just taking profits
• 14:28
  from selling software and occasionally buying
• 14:30
  crypto, right? Not at all. They have engineered
• 14:33
  a relentless debt and equity machine. They track
• 14:36
  their success using a proprietary metric called
• 14:38
  BTC yield, currently sitting at 12 .6 % year
• 14:41
  to date. What is that actually a measure? It
• 14:43
  measures how successfully their financial maneuvering
• 14:46
  is growing the ratio of Bitcoin held per share
• 14:48
  of stock. Right, but I really want to untack
• 14:50
  how they are funding this because it sounds like
• 14:52
  Wall Street alchemy to me. It kind of is. They
• 14:55
  are issuing shares through their MSTR equity
• 14:58
  program, but they are also leaning heavily on
• 15:00
  something called a variable rate series. a perpetual
• 15:03
  stretch preferred stock or STRC. That's a mouthful.
• 15:07
  Seriously. And this STRC stock pays an 11 .5
• 15:11
  % annualized dividend. Why would a company take
• 15:14
  on an expensive 11 .5 % dividend obligation just
• 15:18
  to buy a highly volatile digital asset that produces
• 15:21
  zero cash flow? Because it is a play of absolute
• 15:24
  unbending conviction. They believe the long -term
• 15:27
  appreciation of Bitcoin will so vastly outperform
• 15:30
  the fiat currency system that an 11 .5 % cost
• 15:33
  to capital is basically a rounding error in the
• 15:35
  long run. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor essentially
• 15:37
  mocked the risk, taking to social media to tease
• 15:41
  the $2 billion buy by promising big -dot energy.
• 15:45
  which is a nod to adding another massive acquisition
• 15:47
  point on their famous chart of purchases. They
• 15:49
  are also doing some incredibly slick balance
• 15:51
  sheet management behind the scenes though. They
• 15:54
  just retired 1 .5 billion dollars of their zero
• 15:57
  coupon 2029 convertible notes for 1 .38 billion
• 16:01
  dollars. Walk us through that mechanism because
• 16:04
  it sounds like they just made free money. It
• 16:06
  is a brilliant financial maneuver. A zero coupon
• 16:09
  note is basically a corporate bond that doesn't
• 16:11
  pay regular interest along the way. Instead,
• 16:14
  the company promises to pay a larger lump sum
• 16:16
  at maturity, which in this case is the year 2029.
• 16:20
  OK, got it. But because broader interest rates
• 16:22
  or market conditions shifted, the current holders
• 16:24
  of that debt were willing to take a haircut to
• 16:26
  get cash now. So strategy went to them and said,
• 16:30
  we will give you 92 cents today for every dollar
• 16:32
  we owe you in 2029. Oh, that's smart. They wiped
• 16:35
  out a billion and a half dollars of future liability
• 16:38
  for significantly less than its face value. Which
• 16:41
  instantly frees up their balance sheet to hold,
• 16:44
  you guessed it, more Bitcoin. Exactly. But that
• 16:47
  massive debt maneuvering did spark some rumors.
• 16:50
  People started wondering if they are paying down
• 16:53
  debt and funding an 11 .5 % dividend, are they
• 16:56
  finally going to have to sell some of their Bitcoin
• 16:58
  stack to cover the bills? Saylor shut those whispers
• 17:01
  down immediately. He made it publicly clear that
• 17:04
  strategy is a net accumulator. He insisted that
• 17:07
  for every single coin they might be forced to
• 17:10
  sell for operational liquidity, they are committed
• 17:12
  to buying 10 to 20 more. There is no exit strategy.
• 17:16
  Right. Bitcoin is the strategy. Wait, hold on,
• 17:18
  though. This is where the core philosophy totally
• 17:20
  fractures for me. Bitcoin was engineered from
• 17:23
  its genesis block to be a decentralized peer
• 17:26
  to peer asset, right? Yep. That was the original
• 17:28
  vision. A way to escape centralized banking and
• 17:30
  massive institutional control. But if strategy
• 17:34
  now owns 4 % of the entire global supply, hasn't
• 17:37
  it just become a centralized corporate treasury?
• 17:39
  It's a very valid concern. It's like a massive
• 17:42
  index fund quietly buying up so many voting shares
• 17:45
  of a public company that they effectively control
• 17:47
  the board. Does a decentralized asset survive
• 17:51
  that kind of centralized market gravity? That
• 17:53
  is the defining tension of institutional crypto
• 17:56
  adoption right there. The underlying technical
• 17:58
  protocol of Bitcoin remains entirely decentralized.
• 18:02
  Strategy cannot alter the code, they cannot inflate
• 18:05
  the 21 million supply cap, and they cannot censor
• 18:08
  someone else's transaction. Okay, the code is
• 18:10
  safe. But the economic gravity is becoming fiercely
• 18:13
  concentrated. When a single corporate entity
• 18:16
  holds 4 % of a finite global asset, their internal
• 18:19
  governance, their debt structuring, and their
• 18:21
  sheer market weight exert massive pressure. So
• 18:24
  they could tank the market. If a black swan event
• 18:26
  forced strategy to liquidate even a fraction
• 18:29
  of that position to cover those STRC dividends,
• 18:31
  The impact on the supposedly decentralized market
• 18:34
  would be completely seismic. Before we wrap up,
• 18:36
  a quick thanks to Old Glory, an iconic music
• 18:38
  and sports fan merch store. Perfect for the techie
• 18:41
  in your life. Use promo code SNARFL for 15 %
• 18:44
  off at oldglory .com. So when we step back and
• 18:47
  look at this entire landscape, the students booing
• 18:50
  in the stadium, the open source developers drowning
• 18:53
  in automated spam, the financial titans building
• 18:56
  billions in debt to hoard digital gold. What
• 18:59
  is the central insight here? How do we synthesize
• 19:02
  all of this for the listener? I think if we connect
• 19:05
  all these dots, the through line is that technology
• 19:07
  is scaling infinitely faster than human infrastructure
• 19:10
  can adapt. We spent the last 40 years assuming
• 19:13
  that the ultimate bottleneck of the future would
• 19:15
  be silicon. That we wouldn't have enough computing
• 19:17
  power or network bandwidth. Exactly. But today's
• 19:20
  stories prove that silicon has won. The real
• 19:23
  bottleneck is the human capacity to absorb the
• 19:25
  change. Whether it's a graduate's capacity to
• 19:27
  pivot careers, a developer's capacity to read
• 19:30
  code, or a market's capacity to digest corporate
• 19:33
  concentration, we are the friction point. I love
• 19:36
  the way you phrased that earlier. Friction is
• 19:38
  just energy waiting to find a new direction.
• 19:41
  For you, the listener, navigating this reality
• 19:44
  means paying attention to where those sparks
• 19:46
  are flying. The friction points, the boos, the
• 19:49
  unmanageable mailing lists, the aggressive corporate
• 19:52
  treasury maneuvers, that is exactly where you
• 19:54
  spot what comes next. We are living through the
• 19:57
  very awkward, very messy adolescence of these
• 20:00
  technologies. The storms are loud, but they are
• 20:02
  shaping the new topography. They absolutely are.
• 20:05
  And I want to leave you with a final thought
• 20:07
  to mull over as you navigate your own tech landscape
• 20:10
  today. If AI is automating both the creation
• 20:13
  of our problems and the detection of them, and
• 20:16
  automated corporate engines are buying up digital
• 20:18
  assets by the billions, are we inadvertently
• 20:21
  building a future where humans are no longer
• 20:23
  the main characters in the global economy, but
• 20:25
  simply the audience sitting in the bleachers
• 20:28
  watching machines interact with other machines?
• 20:30
  That is a chilling but entirely necessary question
• 20:33
  to ask ourselves right now. We're here to help
• 20:34
  at Snarful, so reach out on our website if you
• 20:36
  have any more questions.