Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / MINISTER of 'TRUTH' Nina Jankowicz claims "Hunter Biden is a foreign expert", and "his case is a waste of time!" WE'LL show you WHY she is wrong!

Transcript

MINISTER of 'TRUTH' Nina Jankowicz claims "Hunter Biden is a foreign expert", and "his case is a waste of time!" WE'LL show you WHY she is wrong! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: New audio coming out of Biden's Ministry of Truth. This
0:05
Speaker 1: new audio has just come out of her assuring that
0:09
Speaker 1: there was nothing improper about Hunter Biden's role with Barisma.
0:13
Speaker 1: This company has been investigated for a long time. She
0:16
Speaker 1: goes on to say, this is Nina Jenko Witch. She's
0:18
Speaker 1: the disinformations are right. She's gonna tell you what's real
0:21
Speaker 1: and what's not real. But before I get to that,
0:23
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about our good friends over
0:25
Speaker 1: at Legacy Precious Metals. If you've been looking at your
0:28
Speaker 1: financial portfolio and what's happening on Wall Street, and you're
0:32
Speaker 1: terrified to open that envelope that comes in the mail
0:35
Speaker 1: with your financial statement, it is time for you to
0:38
Speaker 1: call Legacy Precious Metals and make sure that you're diversified.
0:42
Speaker 1: You've been seeing what the market's doing. It's insane up,
0:44
Speaker 1: a thousand points down, a thousand points down, eight hundred down,
0:47
Speaker 1: another thousand down of the five hundred. It is brutal
0:50
Speaker 1: what's happening in our economy right now, and that is
0:53
Speaker 1: exactly why many are investing in gold and silver. Now.
0:56
Speaker 1: I've been doing this now for when I say, literally
0:58
Speaker 1: decades decades. Why because when there's a really bad day
1:01
Speaker 1: on Wall Street. I know I'm diversified. When we see
1:04
Speaker 1: the trends that are happening right now, I know that
1:06
Speaker 1: I am diversified, so I don't have to worry because
1:09
Speaker 1: I have a financial portfolio that is not all eggs
1:12
Speaker 1: in one basket with Wall Street. If you've never looked
1:16
Speaker 1: at Precious Metals, call Legacy right now and get their
1:19
Speaker 1: free investors Guide. Their number, their number eight sixty six
1:24
Speaker 1: four seven three sixty two oh four. That's eight sixty
1:28
Speaker 1: six four seven three sixty two o four. There's a
1:31
Speaker 1: reason why knew Gingrich, Turshregan, Larry Cudlow and many others
1:36
Speaker 1: just like myself. Trust Legacy Precious Metals. Go online to
1:40
Speaker 1: Legacy PM investments dot com. That's Legacy PM investments dot com. Also,
1:46
Speaker 1: just want to say very quickly for so many of
1:48
Speaker 1: you that have just found this podcast because of many
1:51
Speaker 1: of you finding us on Twitter now for the first
1:53
Speaker 1: time with what's happened there, make sure that you hit
1:56
Speaker 1: that auto download or subscribe button so you can grab
1:59
Speaker 1: this podcast every day automatically for free. Now. This is
2:02
Speaker 1: Nina Janko. Wit take a listen. The accusation is that
2:06
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden in serving on the board of a Ukrainian company,
2:10
Speaker 1: which you know he is allowed to do. He was
2:12
Speaker 1: not the only foreign experts serving on the board of
2:14
Speaker 1: Ukrainian company. By the way, I love how she just
2:17
Speaker 1: referred to him as a foreign expert. Did you hear
2:19
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden out of nowhere has become a foreign expert. Well,
2:24
Speaker 1: let's just let's just rewind that real quick. This is
2:27
Speaker 1: the woman. And by the way, he's an expert on
2:29
Speaker 1: anything but coke, okay, cocaine, drugs, hookers, you could say,
2:33
Speaker 1: as an expert on that, going on benders, expert on that, right,
2:38
Speaker 1: Russian hookers, expert on that. But she just made up
2:42
Speaker 1: something that's a lie. This is the Ministry of Truth
2:45
Speaker 1: telling you that Hunter Biden is a foreign expert on
2:51
Speaker 1: oil and gas, which he's never had anything to do with. Listen,
2:54
Speaker 1: it was not the only foreign experts serving on the
2:56
Speaker 1: board of Ukrainian company was involved in some corrupt behavior
3:00
Speaker 1: of that company. This company has been investigated for a
3:03
Speaker 1: long time. Burisma is the name of the company. There's
3:06
Speaker 1: never been any indication that Hunter Biden was involved in
3:10
Speaker 1: anything untoward. There are questions about whether he should have
3:13
Speaker 1: taken that board appointment given his father's role, as you know,
3:18
Speaker 1: the Obama administration's main emissary to Ukraine. But that's not
3:22
Speaker 1: necessarily something that Joe Biden has control over. It certainly
3:25
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with Joe Biden's policies towards Ukraine.
3:31
Speaker 1: And this has spun into a whole other host of nonsense,
3:36
Speaker 1: basically that Joe Biden withheld aid to Ukraine in order
3:40
Speaker 1: to get a resolution to this investigation into Burisma and
3:45
Speaker 1: get his son out of the line light. It's just
3:48
Speaker 1: it's a load of nonsense. The investigation that is in
3:51
Speaker 1: question was closed at the time that Biden was kind
3:54
Speaker 1: of doing a carrot and stick routine which many diplomats
3:57
Speaker 1: do related to Ukraine in order to get some some
4:01
Speaker 1: financial reforms through and anti corruption reforms. And there's a
4:06
Speaker 1: whole host of other allegations that just don't even bear repeating,
4:10
Speaker 1: but they basically come, don't even bear repeating, don't even
4:15
Speaker 1: bear repeating. This is your now, woman who's running the government? Disinformation? Right,
4:23
Speaker 1: government disinformation, This is now what's happening. Don't even bear
4:28
Speaker 1: repeating it, right, this is hey, you don't need to
4:32
Speaker 1: you don't need to repeat any of this. Right, everything's fine,
4:37
Speaker 1: nothing's wrong with Hunter Biden. Everybody knows that nothing's wrong
4:40
Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden. He's a foreign expert, just like everybody
4:47
Speaker 1: else serving on a company as a foreign expert on
4:51
Speaker 1: what we don't know. But everything you've heard about this
4:54
Speaker 1: is wrong. Everything you know about this is wrong. Right,
4:58
Speaker 1: it's all wrong, folks, every body, it's wrong. Understand it's wrong.
5:04
Speaker 1: It's all I And this is the woman that's going
5:08
Speaker 1: to decide what is real and what is not, what
5:10
Speaker 1: is truthful and what is not. So move on, everybody.
5:15
Speaker 1: Nina Jankowitch, the Bide Ministry of Truth, assuring you that
5:17
Speaker 1: there was nothing improper about Hunter Biden's roll in barisma
5:21
Speaker 1: through these vectors of untrustworthy information in Ukrainian society, to Joe,
5:28
Speaker 1: to Rudy Giuliani, excuse me, and then make their way
5:32
Speaker 1: to the President's ears. So there it is. She said
5:35
Speaker 1: it's not real, So therefore it's not real because she's
5:38
Speaker 1: Nina Jankowitch. New Ginger just come out saying, not only
5:41
Speaker 1: is Joe Biden a liar when it comes to his
5:44
Speaker 1: son's business dealings, but he also wrote an eight hundred
5:48
Speaker 1: thousand dollars check for Hunters businesses. So the idea that
5:52
Speaker 1: he never spoke about the business dealings with Hunter Biden,
5:55
Speaker 1: we know is absurd because no father writes an eight
5:58
Speaker 1: hundred thousand our check for anyone without asking some questions.
6:05
Speaker 1: And we all know that. I want you to take
6:09
Speaker 1: a listen to what he had to say while he
6:13
Speaker 1: was talking with Maria bart to Roma about Joe Biden
6:16
Speaker 1: not only being a liar, but the fact that we
6:18
Speaker 1: clearly need a deep investigation into the Biden crime family
6:23
Speaker 1: that he describes as nothing more than like the mafia,
6:26
Speaker 1: also have corruption in plain sight. And I want to
6:29
Speaker 1: get your take on that. And and and you mentioned
6:32
Speaker 1: the University of Pennsylvania secret Chinese money. You think that's
6:37
Speaker 1: it an even bigger story than the corruption of what's
6:41
Speaker 1: on Hunter's laptop, right, walk us through what you mean well,
6:44
Speaker 1: and by the way, let me explain this to you
6:46
Speaker 1: so you understand a little bit deeper. And I'll remind
6:48
Speaker 1: you we did a deep dive in our podcast into this.
6:51
Speaker 1: The University of Pennsylvania had been taking insane amounts of
6:54
Speaker 1: money from Chinese donors, many of them anonymous Chinese donors,
6:58
Speaker 1: some of them giving fifty four teen and a half
7:00
Speaker 1: fifteen million dollars, if my memory serves me correctly. Why
7:04
Speaker 1: Because Biden was involved at the University of Pennsylvania and
7:08
Speaker 1: the University of Pennsylvania was taking this money from the
7:12
Speaker 1: Chinese government and these Chinese sources, and we're talking about
7:16
Speaker 1: insane amount of dollars. Now, the question is where were
7:21
Speaker 1: the kickbacks coming from. Now, penn had the Biden Center
7:25
Speaker 1: for Public Policy, and the money was flowing in. And
7:28
Speaker 1: if you wanted to do business with Joe Biden, if
7:30
Speaker 1: you wanted to do things with Joe Biden in general,
7:33
Speaker 1: what we have learned very clearly is you had to
7:37
Speaker 1: give cash to the Bidens, whether that was through the
7:41
Speaker 1: University of Pennsylvania which was easiest to they to funnel money.
7:43
Speaker 1: In my questions, how much money did he make, how
7:47
Speaker 1: much cash did he make? How much money was there
7:50
Speaker 1: in all of this, right, like how much cash was
7:56
Speaker 1: going from the University of Pennsylvania after it funneled to
7:59
Speaker 1: them from China from communist Chinese people quote anonymous donors
8:04
Speaker 1: to the Biden crime family, And that's exactly where I
8:07
Speaker 1: want to pick it up with New Gingrich because that's
8:09
Speaker 1: what he's about to explain saying, you want to talk
8:11
Speaker 1: about corruption, look at the University of penn Look at
8:14
Speaker 1: the money going into the pen Biden Center for Public Policy.
8:19
Speaker 1: Look at how much cash is being funneled from the
8:21
Speaker 1: communist Chinese government indirectly through the university then going to
8:28
Speaker 1: the family. Well, well, the University of Pennsylvania that we
8:33
Speaker 1: know of, has gotten at least sixty seven million dollars
8:38
Speaker 1: from Chinese sources, anonymous sources. The University of Pennsylvania refused
8:43
Speaker 1: to turn over information to the Justice Department in the
8:46
Speaker 1: last year the Trump presidency. One of the major jobs
8:49
Speaker 1: of Congress should be to subpoena the University of Pennsylvania's records.
8:53
Speaker 1: They created the Penn Biden Center for Public Policy. I
8:58
Speaker 1: don't know how many administrations staff were being paid from
9:01
Speaker 1: that center, but they were being paid with Chinese money.
9:05
Speaker 1: And you have anonymous Chinese donors, the largest of which
9:08
Speaker 1: was fourteen and a half million dollars. So you take
9:11
Speaker 1: everything that Hunter Biden ever did, and then you look
9:14
Speaker 1: at what Joe Biden was doing. The story here is
9:17
Speaker 1: not Hunter Biden. The story here is the head of
9:19
Speaker 1: the family. Just like a mafia family. The head of
9:22
Speaker 1: the family who. By the way, if you go back
9:24
Speaker 1: and pull up what he said in various campaign events,
9:27
Speaker 1: I knew nothing. I never discussed my son's business. Well,
9:31
Speaker 1: we now know he wrote an eight hundred thousand dollars
9:33
Speaker 1: check for his son's legal expenses in business. Is eight
9:37
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars check? Okay, we now know that Joe
9:43
Speaker 1: Biden wrote an eight hundred thousand dollars check for a
9:45
Speaker 1: son's legal expenses in business. How can you say that
9:51
Speaker 1: you know nothing about someone's legal expenses, or his business,
9:59
Speaker 1: or his business life, or his business expenses when clearly
10:03
Speaker 1: you do. You don't just write a random check for
10:07
Speaker 1: eight hundred thousand dollars without asking a question. There's no way.
10:13
Speaker 1: It's impossible. No one writes an eight hundred thousand dollars
10:17
Speaker 1: random check without asking any questions. That doesn't happen, and
10:23
Speaker 1: we all know it. Now. Listen to this closing argument
10:28
Speaker 1: for New Gingrich as he was talking about not only
10:32
Speaker 1: this eight hundred thousand dollars check for Biden's businesses, but
10:36
Speaker 1: this idea that Joe Biden didn't know anything about it.
10:39
Speaker 1: This wasn't criminal, This was writing to be including Chinese businesses.
10:43
Speaker 1: He wants us to believe he wrote an eight hundred
10:45
Speaker 1: thousand dollars check and didn't discuss his son's business. He
10:49
Speaker 1: wants us to believe they flew for seventeen hours to
10:51
Speaker 1: China and they didn't discuss his son's business. The truth is,
10:55
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is a liar. This is a corrupt family
10:58
Speaker 1: occupying the White House, and we need to get to
11:01
Speaker 1: the bottom of it. And I believe the University of
11:03
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania's sixty seven million dollars from China is a lot
11:08
Speaker 1: bigger scandal than Hunter Biden's laptop, as big a hand
11:11
Speaker 1: as scandal, frankly as the laptop is, where did the
11:15
Speaker 1: money come from? Who is running the checks, and where
11:17
Speaker 1: did the money go after it was written to the
11:19
Speaker 1: University of Pennsylvania. That's question one that everybody in the
11:23
Speaker 1: media should be asking. They're not how is it that?
11:27
Speaker 1: And again, the Republicans need to get their heads out
11:29
Speaker 1: of their rear ind and they need to subpoena these
11:31
Speaker 1: documents from the University of Pennsylvania. They need to actually
11:35
Speaker 1: start fighting back and not just sitting there like a
11:38
Speaker 1: bunch of lazy eightables's in Congress, which is what the
11:41
Speaker 1: majority of them are actually doing right now. But you
11:45
Speaker 1: put these two stories together, and you put the Durham
11:48
Speaker 1: winning this major legal battle to unveil Hillary Clinton's fusion
11:51
Speaker 1: GPS documents previously kept secret under the cause of attorney
11:56
Speaker 1: client privilege. That's now gone. You look what we now
12:00
Speaker 1: know about Joe Biden and the eight hundred thousand dollar check.
12:05
Speaker 1: It is significant. You cannot say that it's not. The
12:11
Speaker 1: media clearly doesn't want you to know the truth about
12:14
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. The media doesn't want you to know what
12:19
Speaker 1: has happened with Hunter Biden. I was hosting last week Outnumbered,
12:24
Speaker 1: and one of the guest hosts on that show is
12:26
Speaker 1: Tommy Lauren, and she had this to say. She was
12:29
Speaker 1: spot on about the media continuing to look the other
12:32
Speaker 1: way about the Hunter Biden scandal. This is important for
12:34
Speaker 1: all Americans and the fact that those in mainstream media,
12:37
Speaker 1: or at least it seems that the folks in mainstream
12:40
Speaker 1: media are not curious. I don't think it's a lack
12:42
Speaker 1: of curiosity. I think they don't want to know the
12:43
Speaker 1: truth because then they would have to admit that they
12:46
Speaker 1: originally never wanted to talk about the laptop in the
12:48
Speaker 1: first place, and then they had to talk about it. Yeah,
12:51
Speaker 1: the disinformation. I'm so glad we have that governance board. Now,
12:54
Speaker 1: maybe they should look into this, Maybe they should look
12:56
Speaker 1: into the big guy. But there's also to the point
12:58
Speaker 1: of he's paying the legal fees. You're paying your son's
13:01
Speaker 1: legal fees, but you don't know what the legal fees
13:03
Speaker 1: are for. There's missing millions of dollars that unaccounted for
13:07
Speaker 1: in terms of Biden's finances. There's these emails that again
13:10
Speaker 1: are talking about the big Guy talking about certain kickbacks.
13:13
Speaker 1: And I want to know whether it was Joe or Hunter,
13:16
Speaker 1: because even if it's just Hunter, it's still bad. What
13:18
Speaker 1: did he have to give to get all these positions
13:22
Speaker 1: on all these boards? It certainly wasn't his talent and skill.
13:25
Speaker 1: He has no marketable talents and skills. So what did
13:27
Speaker 1: he have to give up? And to the detriment of us,
13:31
Speaker 1: because we need to know that if vulnerable, like we
13:35
Speaker 1: know that even Joe, I love that he was vulnerable
13:37
Speaker 1: because he was a drug addict and his father exploited
13:40
Speaker 1: his addiction. Is what Aris Faulkner is saying there. It's
13:42
Speaker 1: what I've been saying for months now. There's two other
13:45
Speaker 1: big headlines also dealing with Hunter Biden that also again
13:49
Speaker 1: the media is not covering. Hunter Biden is now enlisted
13:53
Speaker 1: a Hollywood mega lawyer for not just counsel, but also funding.
13:58
Speaker 1: Sources are now saying Hunter Biden has garnered quiet support
14:02
Speaker 1: in financial backing from a high powered Hollywood attorney while
14:06
Speaker 1: awaiting the outcome of a long running federal investigation into
14:10
Speaker 1: his taxes and finances being conducted by the US Attorney
14:13
Speaker 1: in Delaware. Multiple sources have now confirmed to CBS News
14:18
Speaker 1: Kevin Morris, the attorney known for crafting the five hundred
14:23
Speaker 1: and fifty million dollars licensing deal for the creators of
14:28
Speaker 1: South Park and who later won a Tony Award as
14:31
Speaker 1: a co producer of the hit musical Book of Mormon,
14:34
Speaker 1: is now crafting a legal and media strategy for Hunter Biden.
14:40
Speaker 1: His office confirmed yes, this is happening when they were
14:43
Speaker 1: reached for comment. President Biden's son is maintaining a robust
14:49
Speaker 1: New York based legal team handling his defense and the
14:53
Speaker 1: ongoing criminal probe and Delaware that has been focused on
14:57
Speaker 1: his taxes. Yes, his axes now. CBS News this weekend
15:03
Speaker 1: with its exclusive finally came out and had this to
15:07
Speaker 1: say about Hunter Biden. Now again, this is on the
15:10
Speaker 1: CBS News investigating Hunter Biden have subpoena documents from a
15:15
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen paternity lawsuit. Those documents include tax records from
15:19
Speaker 1: the President's son dating back to twenty seventeen. Investigators obtained
15:24
Speaker 1: records from the lawyer who represented the woman who filed
15:27
Speaker 1: the twenty nineteen lawsuit claiming Hunter Biden was the father
15:30
Speaker 1: of her child. That lawyer told CBS News prosecutors quote
15:34
Speaker 1: wanted every record relating to Hunter Biden. We had CBS
15:38
Speaker 1: News Senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge joins us now for
15:42
Speaker 1: more on this. Hi, Katherine, great to see you. So
15:45
Speaker 1: what exactly our prosecutors looking for in these documents that
15:50
Speaker 1: you know, as we said, are from many years ago, Tanya,
15:54
Speaker 1: our CBS News investigative team was able to obtain this
15:58
Speaker 1: subpoena that was sent by the US Attorney's Office in
16:01
Speaker 1: Delaware in December of twenty twenty to a law firm
16:05
Speaker 1: in Arkansas that represented London Roberts, the woman who brought
16:09
Speaker 1: and settled paternity suit with Hunter Biden. This is a
16:13
Speaker 1: very broad subpoena seeking financial records, and it falls into
16:17
Speaker 1: two distinct buckets. The first has to do with the
16:20
Speaker 1: flow of money in and out of his accounts. It
16:23
Speaker 1: asked for all documents, emails, instant messages related to income, expenses, debts,
16:29
Speaker 1: financial transactions both personal and business. And the second buncket,
16:34
Speaker 1: is really very focused on his tax situation. It calls
16:38
Speaker 1: for federal, state, local, income and payroll taxes. Now, you've
16:42
Speaker 1: got to ask yourself a question real quick, why is
16:44
Speaker 1: CBS News actually doing the report that I'm playing for
16:46
Speaker 1: you now? Because I think they realize they have no
16:48
Speaker 1: other choice. And it may be that Hunter Biden, listening
16:52
Speaker 1: this Hollywood mega lawyer for counsel and funding, has said, look,
16:55
Speaker 1: let's go ahead and get the story out there, because
16:57
Speaker 1: there's no reason not too at this point. Then let's
17:00
Speaker 1: just try to separate that story from your father. That
17:03
Speaker 1: may be their strategy, their best option right now, because
17:05
Speaker 1: if I was their media strategy team member right now,
17:08
Speaker 1: that's what I would be telling them to do. And
17:10
Speaker 1: if you notice, this report really doesn't have a lot
17:13
Speaker 1: to do with Joe Biden, It's all about Hunter Biden
17:15
Speaker 1: trying to imply that Hunter Biden's out on a raft
17:18
Speaker 1: by himself that his father knew nothing about any of this.
17:21
Speaker 1: Continue to listen to these documents, so they talk about
17:24
Speaker 1: the scope of this new subpoena. Former US attorney told
17:28
Speaker 1: us that this kind of subpoena really indicates to him
17:31
Speaker 1: that the US attorney in Delaware is leaving no stone
17:34
Speaker 1: unturned in his investigation. Catherine, why are these documents so important? Well, well,
17:39
Speaker 1: these documents are important because it's part of a data
17:43
Speaker 1: chain that leads to the grandjury testimony of London Roberts,
17:48
Speaker 1: the woman who brought and settled that paternity suit with
17:51
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. So we begin with December of twenty twenty
17:54
Speaker 1: this very broad subpoena for financial records that goes to
17:58
Speaker 1: the law firm in Arkansas, and then, according to her lawyer,
18:02
Speaker 1: Clint Lancaster, there was an in person meeting in the
18:06
Speaker 1: fall of twenty twenty one with a representative of the
18:09
Speaker 1: US Attorney's office in Delaware as well as an FBI
18:13
Speaker 1: agent and an IRS enforcement agent along with his client.
18:17
Speaker 1: And then earlier this year in February, London Roberts goes
18:21
Speaker 1: to the grand jury in Delaware and testifies and what
18:25
Speaker 1: we understand through our reporting is that it says that
18:28
Speaker 1: there is something in those records that she has first
18:32
Speaker 1: hand information about that the US attorney in Delaware wanted
18:36
Speaker 1: to lock in as testimony before that grand jury. So
18:40
Speaker 1: it's the data chain that really matters here. So, Katherine,
18:43
Speaker 1: could any of this information in any way implicate President Biden?
18:48
Speaker 1: I don't want to Well, I love this right very
18:50
Speaker 1: end of the interview. Is there anything in here that
18:52
Speaker 1: could implicate President Joe Biden? Katherine herritage listen to which
18:58
Speaker 1: I don't want to speculate on that. We're just trying
19:00
Speaker 1: to make this about a hunter speculate on the standing
19:03
Speaker 1: of this investigation. But I just want to lay out
19:06
Speaker 1: with the White House position is and what we know
19:08
Speaker 1: through our own reporting here at CBS. Hold on, So
19:10
Speaker 1: you didn't answer the question did you know? Of course not.
19:13
Speaker 1: Why would I answer that question. I don't want to
19:15
Speaker 1: speculate on that. Are you kidding me? I'm not gonna
19:19
Speaker 1: speculate on that. What do you think? I don't want
19:23
Speaker 1: you to think for a moment that I'm going to
19:25
Speaker 1: talk about present of the United States of America when
19:28
Speaker 1: his son's clearly involved in all this I am no
19:31
Speaker 1: ho no, no, no, no, no, we are not. We
19:34
Speaker 1: are not going to talk about that. You need to
19:37
Speaker 1: be quiet. I'm just gonna tell you what their perspective
19:40
Speaker 1: is and we're gonna move on. Translation. Dude, he's a
19:44
Speaker 1: drug addict. Okay, that made some stupid deals and this
19:47
Speaker 1: has nothing to do in any capacity, right, this has
19:52
Speaker 1: nothing to do with Joe Biden. Everybody be quiet, the
19:56
Speaker 1: presents uninvolved. We're just gonna, we're gonna, we're gonna totally
20:00
Speaker 1: separate the two. That's all this is. That's that's it.
20:05
Speaker 1: That's just it's it's it's it's as simple as that
20:08
Speaker 1: they think you're this done. They think that you are
20:10
Speaker 1: this stupid, that you're gonna that you're gonna fall for this,
20:15
Speaker 1: that you're gonna look at this and you're gonna think, oh,
20:17
Speaker 1: it's It's totally normal for a Hollywood lawyer who represents
20:21
Speaker 1: Southpark creator and Chris Rock paying off two million dollars
20:23
Speaker 1: of Hunter Biden's overdue taxes acting as his sugar daddy
20:27
Speaker 1: or sugar brother. Right, Hunter Biden had his tax bill
20:32
Speaker 1: of more than two million dollars actually paid for by
20:34
Speaker 1: a Hollywood lawyer. Wonder why what's he trying to hide? Hunter,
20:39
Speaker 1: Biden's attorney said Morris is quite a trust advisor of
20:41
Speaker 1: the present's son. Morris also co produced the Book of
20:44
Speaker 1: Mormon and is a published author. And all of a sudden,
20:47
Speaker 1: you just decide to go in and pay two million
20:49
Speaker 1: dollars of your overdue taxes out of nowhere, and we're
20:53
Speaker 1: not supposed to ask any questions about this and just
20:55
Speaker 1: accept it like this is completely and totally normal. And
21:00
Speaker 1: then you go back to Katherine Heritage again, She's like, well,
21:03
Speaker 1: let me just tell you the White House's perspective here.
21:05
Speaker 1: That's what you really that's what you really need to
21:08
Speaker 1: be worried about, Like this is the this is the
21:10
Speaker 1: white House. Okay, this the white House's perspective. I wouldn't
21:14
Speaker 1: say that there's any real connection here between any of
21:17
Speaker 1: this and the president. Information in any way implicate President Biden.
21:22
Speaker 1: I don't want to speculate on the standing of this investigation,
21:26
Speaker 1: but I just want to lay out what the White
21:27
Speaker 1: House position is and what we know through our own
21:30
Speaker 1: reporting here at CBS News. Recently, the White House Chief
21:33
Speaker 1: of Staff was asked about this issue, and he said
21:36
Speaker 1: that the President felt that his family had done the
21:39
Speaker 1: right thing, but then also added that these were the
21:42
Speaker 1: actions of Hunter Biden and James Biden, the President's brother,
21:46
Speaker 1: and that these were private matters and that President Biden
21:50
Speaker 1: was not involved. What we know through our reporting here
21:52
Speaker 1: at CBS News is that there was another subpoena that
21:56
Speaker 1: was sent out to one of the major banks here
21:58
Speaker 1: in the United States, and it was seeking not only
22:01
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's records his former business partners, but also the
22:05
Speaker 1: records of the President's brother, James Biden. And these records
22:09
Speaker 1: went back to twenty fourteen. And the reason that timing
22:12
Speaker 1: matters is that it spans a period when Joe Biden
22:16
Speaker 1: was the vice president. Whoa, oh, let's bury that at
22:19
Speaker 1: the end. So you got Joe Biden's brother and his
22:23
Speaker 1: tax records being subpoenaed or his bank records being subpoena
22:26
Speaker 1: going back to when his brother was the vice president
22:29
Speaker 1: right twenty fourteen. But we're not going to speculate if
22:33
Speaker 1: any of this involves the President of the United States
22:35
Speaker 1: of America. Why would we do that. His dad just
22:37
Speaker 1: paid an eight hundred thousand dollar legal bill for his
22:39
Speaker 1: son's businesses, right, not for a lawsuit, but for his businesses.
22:42
Speaker 1: We know that you think you just randomly write checks
22:44
Speaker 1: to your son for eight hundred thousand dollars. Come on, man,
22:47
Speaker 1: to quote Joe Biden, Come on, man, you ask. Special
22:51
Speaker 1: counsel John Durham won a legal victory want a judge
22:55
Speaker 1: presiding over his case against cybersecurity lawyer Michael Sessman ruled
23:01
Speaker 1: that some Hillary Clinton fusion GPS documents that have been
23:06
Speaker 1: previously kept secret under the alibi of attorney client privilege
23:12
Speaker 1: can now be revealed in court. The documents, Durham argued,
23:17
Speaker 1: are quote critical and crucial in building his case against Sussman,
23:23
Speaker 1: a former Perkins Coy partner, accused of lying to the
23:26
Speaker 1: FBI when presenting alleged evidence connecting then presidential candidate Donald
23:32
Speaker 1: Trump and his campaign to the Kremlin connected Alpha Bank
23:36
Speaker 1: in Russia. We know that all of that is a lie.
23:40
Speaker 1: Everybody in the media has said it's a lie. It's
23:43
Speaker 1: the same information that we get you kicked off social
23:45
Speaker 1: media if you shared it just months ago. Now. At
23:49
Speaker 1: the time Susman presented the evidence to FBI lawyer James Baker,
23:55
Speaker 1: he claimed that he was acting as a private citizen
23:59
Speaker 1: and not on half of any client. We know that's
24:02
Speaker 1: a lie. We know he was acting on behalf of
24:04
Speaker 1: the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Billing
24:08
Speaker 1: records later proved that Setzman had charged the time when
24:14
Speaker 1: he was meeting with the FBI lawyer James Baker, claiming
24:17
Speaker 1: that he was not acting as a private citizen to
24:20
Speaker 1: the Clinton campaign. That's right, while he was meeting with
24:24
Speaker 1: the FBI, he was billing Hillary Clinton. Durham is seeking
24:28
Speaker 1: to prove that Sessman was indeed secretly acting on behalf
24:33
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party in general the DNC, because they
24:36
Speaker 1: were helping pay for this and Hillary Clinton her campaign
24:41
Speaker 1: when he fabricated allegations against the Trump campaign, allegend collusion
24:48
Speaker 1: with Russia. Now in court, Durham argued that the CIA,
24:54
Speaker 1: in fact had determined that sessmans purported evidence against donal
25:00
Speaker 1: Old J. Trump was not quote unquote technically plausible and
25:07
Speaker 1: did not quote unquote withstand technical scrutiny, and also appeared
25:14
Speaker 1: to be and I'm quoting the FBI or excuse me,
25:16
Speaker 1: the CIA here appeared to be quote user created and
25:20
Speaker 1: not machine slash tool generated. So, in other words, Sessman
25:28
Speaker 1: came in, he made up a lie. The Clinton campaign
25:32
Speaker 1: paid him to fabricate the lie. The Clinton campaign made
25:35
Speaker 1: sure that the lie was well orchestrated, that it was
25:41
Speaker 1: a political lie that would pay huge political dividends for
25:46
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton's campaign. Hillary Clinton knew when she was hiring
25:49
Speaker 1: Sessman that this is what he was good at and
25:51
Speaker 1: it was going to have a major impact, hopefully on
25:54
Speaker 1: the election. That's just some of what we now know. Now,
25:58
Speaker 1: if you said any of this it's over the last
26:01
Speaker 1: several years, since twenty and sixteen, they would tell you
26:06
Speaker 1: that you are a liar. They would tell you, okay,
26:11
Speaker 1: that you were putting out Russian disinformation. They would tell
26:16
Speaker 1: you that you were a part of the Kremlin. This
26:21
Speaker 1: is all again what they've said now Durham winning. This
26:26
Speaker 1: is massive. So why is it that the mainstream media
26:31
Speaker 1: is running fake headlines Because they're trying to save the
26:34
Speaker 1: Democratic Party? Because if Hillary Clinton goes down, so's the
26:37
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, and so does Barack Obama's legacy, and so
26:41
Speaker 1: does Joe Biden. That's why they buried this at Politico
26:46
Speaker 1: with a headline under their legal section, not under political news,
26:50
Speaker 1: under breaking news, under news, under legal quote. Judge spars
26:54
Speaker 1: Clinton Camp and Sessamen ruling. They didn't do that. That's
26:56
Speaker 1: not what happened. This is how they're first paragraph reads.
27:03
Speaker 1: Federal judge is turned down a request from Special Counsel
27:05
Speaker 1: John Durham for a ruling that a lawyer facing trial,
27:08
Speaker 1: don't even use his name, just a lawyer facing trial
27:11
Speaker 1: on a false statement charge was part of a wide
27:14
Speaker 1: ranging joint venture involving Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, Democratic operatives,
27:20
Speaker 1: private investigation firm Fusion GPS, and various technology researchers. And
27:25
Speaker 1: that interesting how they don't even use the name, because
27:28
Speaker 1: the name is significant. Right, if you actually go back
27:32
Speaker 1: and you talk and you look at this case, you
27:34
Speaker 1: know how big of a deal the name is involved. Right,
27:39
Speaker 1: everybody knows or everybody should know, the name Michael Sessman.
27:44
Speaker 1: That's exactly why Politico kept it out of their headline
27:47
Speaker 1: and out of their first paragraph. They just called him
27:50
Speaker 1: some lawyer, acting like this is a non story. The
27:54
Speaker 1: decision Politico goes on to write, issued Saturday afternoon by
27:57
Speaker 1: US District Judge Christopher Cooper, limits Evan and Sin testimony
28:00
Speaker 1: prosecutors can offer against attorney Michael Sessman at a jury
28:04
Speaker 1: trial set to get under way later this month, so
28:07
Speaker 1: they're not even when they do say his name, they're
28:09
Speaker 1: not even connecting him to Hillary Clinton. The ruling spares
28:12
Speaker 1: the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee the potential
28:15
Speaker 1: embarrassment of a federal judge finding they were part of
28:19
Speaker 1: a coordinated effort to levels since discredited allegations that Kennet
28:24
Speaker 1: Donald Trump or his allies maintained a data link from
28:28
Speaker 1: Trump Tower to the Russia's Alpha Bank. The Clinton campaign
28:32
Speaker 1: disseminated that claim amid a broader effort to call out
28:35
Speaker 1: Trump's ties to Russia at a time when US intelligence
28:38
Speaker 1: agencies had revealed efforts by the Russian government to interfere
28:41
Speaker 1: in the twenty sixteen elections. So even politicos still not
28:44
Speaker 1: telling you that it's totally lie. They're saying, well, you're
28:47
Speaker 1: gonna understand why it's out there, right. The Clinton campaign
28:50
Speaker 1: just disseminated that claim amid a broader effort to call
28:53
Speaker 1: out Trump's ties to Russia. So they're basically still implying
28:56
Speaker 1: that Trump still has broader ties to Russia. That is
29:01
Speaker 1: how Politico is reporting a store acting like this a
29:03
Speaker 1: win for Hillary Clinton, when clearly it was not a win.
29:08
Speaker 1: Let me go back to the facts here. The documents,
29:12
Speaker 1: Durham argued are crucial in building his case. Durham is
29:16
Speaker 1: seeking to prove that Susman was indeed secretly acting on
29:20
Speaker 1: behalf of the Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign when
29:24
Speaker 1: he fabricated allegations against the Trump campaign allegend collision with Russia.
29:30
Speaker 1: The Washington Examiner reported Wednesday that Judge Christopher Cooper agreed
29:34
Speaker 1: to grant Durham's motion, arguing he did not believe it
29:37
Speaker 1: was breaking attorney client privilege for him to review the
29:42
Speaker 1: documents in question in an in camera setting or away
29:46
Speaker 1: from the public and the media. One legal blogger appeared
29:51
Speaker 1: to confirm the ruling, uploading purported court documents. The documents
29:56
Speaker 1: reportedly contained redacted communications between him listen carefully, the Democratic
30:02
Speaker 1: National Committee number one, Hillary Clinton's campaign, Hillary for America
30:06
Speaker 1: number two, the Fusion GPS research company number three, and
30:11
Speaker 1: the Perkins Coy law firm number four who worked there
30:15
Speaker 1: Part five Sessman, who's been indicted Kata. Cooper's ruling was
30:21
Speaker 1: a difference between hiring a firm lawyer to conduct fact
30:26
Speaker 1: checking versus hiring it to do opposition research. The Examiner
30:31
Speaker 1: has also reported Hillary for America the DNC and Perkins Coy,
30:38
Speaker 1: the law firm that Hillary Clinton hired, have all claimed
30:41
Speaker 1: that these records should be kept sealed under attorney client
30:45
Speaker 1: privilege since they quote hired Fusion GPS to simply provide
30:50
Speaker 1: legal services. This is where Durham got him. He argued, no, no, no,
30:56
Speaker 1: Fusion gps is work went far beyond league services to
31:02
Speaker 1: engage an out and out opposition research against the Trump campaign,
31:06
Speaker 1: to the point where they were going in line to
31:08
Speaker 1: the FBI as claiming they were some sort of whistleblowers,
31:14
Speaker 1: acting like they were there on their own time, when
31:17
Speaker 1: they were actually billing the Hillary Clinton campaign right for
31:22
Speaker 1: the opposition research they were peddling out to the FBI,
31:26
Speaker 1: to the CIA, and to the media. Now, the court
31:31
Speaker 1: is set to review only thirty eight of one thousand,
31:34
Speaker 1: five hundred documents over which the defendants have asserted privilege.
31:40
Speaker 1: Now this goes back to that fake headline from Politico
31:43
Speaker 1: I was telling you about a moment ago. Their headline
31:46
Speaker 1: says Judge spars Clinton camp and Sessamen, ruling he didn't. Well,
31:50
Speaker 1: they're saying, well, it's only thirty eight documents, right, so
31:53
Speaker 1: therefore they've protected them. Really because of the one thousand,
31:58
Speaker 1: five hundred documents that they were asking to see, they
32:01
Speaker 1: weren't asking, by the way, to see Durham was not
32:04
Speaker 1: asking to see all the documents. Hence the reason why
32:07
Speaker 1: he even says that there may be requests for the
32:11
Speaker 1: introduction in the future of some of these other documents.
32:15
Speaker 1: Are right now all they want is at thirty eight.
32:18
Speaker 1: So this is how the media says, Well, it was
32:20
Speaker 1: mostly a win for Hillary Clinton, even though it clearly wasn't. Now,
32:24
Speaker 1: this ruling clearly freaked out the defendants legal teams. How
32:29
Speaker 1: do we know this? Here's the proof. Clinton campaign lawyer
32:32
Speaker 1: Robert Trout was vigorous and arguing that the government displayed
32:39
Speaker 1: an quote erroneously cramped view of privilege and called it
32:44
Speaker 1: a false choice to say something is either opposition research
32:49
Speaker 1: or covered by privilege. Now, Salesman's lawyer Sean Berkowitz laminated
32:55
Speaker 1: that the quote governments charged a case with attorneys and
33:00
Speaker 1: privilege all over the place quote unquote, and claim the
33:03
Speaker 1: judge's ruling could have a ripple effect that may end
33:06
Speaker 1: up calling thousands of documents and a question. Okay, so
33:10
Speaker 1: let's go back to the lying headline from Politico they
33:13
Speaker 1: say this is a win for Hillary Clinton. Right their headline,
33:17
Speaker 1: the judge spirits Clinton camp in Suessman ruling. The decision,
33:20
Speaker 1: issued Saturday afternoon, limits evidence and testimony prosecutors can offer
33:24
Speaker 1: against attorney Michael Sussman at a jury trial set to
33:27
Speaker 1: get underway later this month. So you would think, well,
33:29
Speaker 1: this as good news. It's not good news, and everybody
33:32
Speaker 1: knows it's not good news. But there it is them
33:35
Speaker 1: spinning this headline. Maybe the new disinformations are will come
33:38
Speaker 1: out and say this isn't the truth, right, I'll be
33:41
Speaker 1: waiting for this now. If you take a step back,
33:45
Speaker 1: what this means is not only is Hillary Clinton in
33:50
Speaker 1: serious trouble now, but Sessman is in serious trouble now.
33:55
Speaker 1: And there's a good chance he's gonna start rolling on
33:57
Speaker 1: people within the Clinton campaign because he was clearly being
34:00
Speaker 1: directed by the Clinton campaign. Like that's that's the most
34:04
Speaker 1: obvious point of all of this. It is very clear,
34:09
Speaker 1: right that, I mean very very very very very clear
34:15
Speaker 1: that he was being directed by Hillary Clinton. He was
34:18
Speaker 1: being directed by Hillary Clinton. He knew what he was
34:20
Speaker 1: being asked to do, and he went and did it.
34:23
Speaker 1: He knew how he was gonna lie, and he did it.
34:25
Speaker 1: He knew that it couldn't come from the Hillary Clinton
34:28
Speaker 1: campaign Wink quink, nod, nod to the FBI. He knew
34:31
Speaker 1: that the CIA and the deep State were going to
34:33
Speaker 1: turn the other way, even though they had to assess
34:35
Speaker 1: that this was fabricate and material from the very beginning,
34:37
Speaker 1: and they still went forward with it because this is
34:40
Speaker 1: the only way they could screw Donald Trump. This wasn't
34:44
Speaker 1: and to be clear, this wasn't anything about actually Trump
34:46
Speaker 1: doing something wrong. This was about winning an election and
34:49
Speaker 1: how you win an election as you go out there
34:52
Speaker 1: and you tell people that Donald Trump is working for
34:57
Speaker 1: the Russians and you undermine Donald Trump that way, and
34:59
Speaker 1: that's exa actually what they did. And it worked. Because
35:02
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was not reelected. You got to impeach him, right,
35:07
Speaker 1: That was a good thing. If you're a Democrat, you
35:10
Speaker 1: love the fact that he was impeached. You're excited about that.
35:13
Speaker 1: This was victory and you thought you were probably going
35:16
Speaker 1: to get away with all of this except Donald Trump,
35:20
Speaker 1: and the pieces of the puzzles started to be put together.
35:23
Speaker 1: And when those pieces of the puzzles started to be
35:25
Speaker 1: put together, and then you had Durham that was appointed
35:28
Speaker 1: to look into this. That's when you knew you were
35:31
Speaker 1: in trouble. And this campaign has not been able to
35:34
Speaker 1: stop it so far. Biden has not been able to
35:38
Speaker 1: stop it so far. Now, if you have this come
35:41
Speaker 1: down and you all of a sudden see that the
35:44
Speaker 1: President of the United States of America and his government,
35:48
Speaker 1: right Joe Biden's Government's been trying to help out Hillary Clinton,
35:51
Speaker 1: this is only going to complicate things that much more
35:55
Speaker 1: because now you've got these other major problems. If you're
35:58
Speaker 1: the White House right now, you may almost wish for
36:01
Speaker 1: a moment that Hillary Clinton becomes a center of attention
36:03
Speaker 1: because you're in such a bad spot. You're in such
36:06
Speaker 1: a bad scenario now when it comes to your own
36:09
Speaker 1: son and those investigations. Don't forget to go backwards and
36:13
Speaker 1: grab our other podcasts. We've been diving into Hunter Biden
36:16
Speaker 1: in the corruption. We have got series about all of
36:20
Speaker 1: this that you can grab so much more information than
36:23
Speaker 1: what I gave you today. That's breaking and I will
36:25
Speaker 1: see you back here tomorrow. Also, don't forget please share
36:27
Speaker 1: this podcast. Hit that download or auto subscribe button as well,
36:31
Speaker 1: so you can get this podcast each and every day,
36:34
Speaker 1: See you back here tomorrow,