Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / SEN. HAGERTY joins me to discuss Ministry of Truth, the Border, Hunter BIDEN, and the SCOTUS leak, as Democrats threaten unrest on justices!

Transcript

SEN. HAGERTY joins me to discuss Ministry of Truth, the Border, Hunter BIDEN, and the SCOTUS leak, as Democrats threaten unrest on justices! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:02
Speaker 1: The repairman who revealed Hunter Biden's laptop is now suing
0:08
Speaker 1: Adam Schiff, CNN, Politico, and the Daily Beasts. Get him.
0:15
Speaker 1: That's what I have to say about that, and I
0:17
Speaker 1: hope he gets paid an insane amount of money. The
0:20
Speaker 1: Delaware computer repairman who blew the whistle on the Hunter
0:23
Speaker 1: Biden laptop has now filed a multimillion dollar defamation suit
0:27
Speaker 1: against Democratic representive Adam Schiffs, CNN, the Daily Beast, Politico,
0:31
Speaker 1: saying they falsely accused him a peddling Russian disinformation. The
0:37
Speaker 1: former shop owner decided to fight back after losing his
0:40
Speaker 1: business and being harassed for eighteen months by big tech,
0:43
Speaker 1: the media, and Delaware locals in President Biden's home state.
0:47
Speaker 1: Quote after fighting to reveal the truth, all I want
0:50
Speaker 1: now is for the rest of the country to know
0:52
Speaker 1: that there was a collective and orchestrated effort by social
0:56
Speaker 1: and mainstream media to block a real story with real
0:59
Speaker 1: consequences for the nation. This was collusion led by fifty
1:05
Speaker 1: one former pillars in the intelligence community and backed by
1:09
Speaker 1: words and actions of a politically motivated d o J
1:12
Speaker 1: and FBI. He continued, I want this lawsuit to reveal
1:16
Speaker 1: that collusion, and more importantly, who gave the marching orders.
1:21
Speaker 1: Too many of you, by the way, that have just
1:22
Speaker 1: found our podcasts don't forget to hit that subscribe or
1:25
Speaker 1: auto download buttons, so you get this podcast every day
1:29
Speaker 1: joining me to talk about this and this is a
1:31
Speaker 1: significant move for this man and a way to not
1:37
Speaker 1: only just clear his name, but also show how corrupt
1:40
Speaker 1: all of this has been with Hunter Biden in the story,
1:42
Speaker 1: is U a Senator from Tennessee, Bill Haggerdy senter. I
1:45
Speaker 1: appreciate you coming on to talk about this because you
1:50
Speaker 1: actually have a Hunter Biden op ed that you published
1:54
Speaker 1: and it questioned the Attorney General Merrick Garland about it
1:57
Speaker 1: in a hearing as well, and you talked about this
2:01
Speaker 1: in the oup ed. You now see that this man
2:02
Speaker 1: is fighting back. Clearly they came after him, they orchestrated
2:06
Speaker 1: this attack, and now he's trying to say, Okay, I'm
2:09
Speaker 1: going to get my life back and I'm going to
2:11
Speaker 1: show what they did to me. You talk about how
2:16
Speaker 1: much of an abuse of power this really has been
2:18
Speaker 1: from the government standpoint looking the other way on Hunter Biden.
2:21
Speaker 1: And now you're talking to Garland directly saying, hey, what
2:24
Speaker 1: are you guys doing over there. Bring everybody up to
2:27
Speaker 1: date where we are now, at least when it comes
2:29
Speaker 1: to Congress. This is a story that's getting hotter by
2:32
Speaker 1: the minute, and the shop owner is just one of
2:35
Speaker 1: the mini victims in all of this. As you mentioned,
2:39
Speaker 1: I questioned Attorney General Gardland last week about this. The
2:41
Speaker 1: conflicts of the just interests are abundantly clear here. This
2:46
Speaker 1: is a massive cover up. And you think about the
2:49
Speaker 1: reputation the shop owner whose livelihood was destroyed. I don't
2:53
Speaker 1: think the radical left care is about whose lives they destroy.
2:56
Speaker 1: It's all about their narrative, and it's all about accomplishing
2:59
Speaker 1: you know, one objects a hatred field objective in so
3:02
Speaker 1: many cases, and in this case you've got criminal tax
3:06
Speaker 1: charges and money laundering charges that are now being undertaken
3:09
Speaker 1: against Hunter Biden. They were underway at that point in time,
3:11
Speaker 1: and they were willing to go ahead and bury the
3:14
Speaker 1: shop owner's reputation. Really, the whole goal was to win
3:17
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty and suppressing this information that might have
3:21
Speaker 1: been very meaningful in the minds of voters. That's what
3:23
Speaker 1: this was all about. And they were willing to use
3:26
Speaker 1: any tool, any tax It's available. It's disgraceful. I appreciate
3:30
Speaker 1: what the shop owners doing in terms of bringing miss
3:32
Speaker 1: a bear and I'm going to do everything I can
3:33
Speaker 1: to continue to shed light on this. I actually use
3:36
Speaker 1: the phrase that a famous Tennessee senator used at a
3:39
Speaker 1: different points time during the Watergate investigations, and that was
3:42
Speaker 1: what did the president know and when did you know it?
3:46
Speaker 1: You know, it's very clear that I think the President
3:50
Speaker 1: United States of America lied to the American people and
3:53
Speaker 1: has continued to lie in the White House Press secretarius
3:56
Speaker 1: continue to lie from the podium saying that Hunter Biden
4:00
Speaker 1: never discussed right, never discussed his business dealings with father.
4:07
Speaker 1: They never talked about it. We now know that his
4:09
Speaker 1: business partner came to the White House more than twenty
4:14
Speaker 1: times that we know of at this point for meetings
4:17
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden. Joe Biden's staff members clearly working on business.
4:23
Speaker 1: Is there going to be any accountability for that? Because
4:27
Speaker 1: that it means that I think it's most people can
4:30
Speaker 1: connect the dots. It means that people within the Biden
4:34
Speaker 1: crime family were selling access to the White House. You know,
4:38
Speaker 1: they were running the operation right out of the White House.
4:40
Speaker 1: It's clear to anybody that looks at it. And if
4:43
Speaker 1: you think that they're going to be able to pull
4:45
Speaker 1: this over the eyes of the American public, that's not true.
4:48
Speaker 1: The question is can we hold them to account in
4:50
Speaker 1: the eyes of the wall, And that's going to be
4:53
Speaker 1: very hard to do until after November because we're going
4:55
Speaker 1: to have to take control of the House and the
4:57
Speaker 1: Senate again, when Adam Schiff is allowed to run rush
5:00
Speaker 1: over people's rights, and you've got these barcycle, you know,
5:05
Speaker 1: procedures going on right now with the so called January
5:07
Speaker 1: sixth Commission, which is just nothing but another one hunt
5:10
Speaker 1: to distract for the twenty two elections here, then you
5:14
Speaker 1: know you've got the democratic soul display. They're not serious
5:17
Speaker 1: about getting to the bottom of anything. It's all about deflection.
5:20
Speaker 1: It's all about controlling the elections. So once we get
5:23
Speaker 1: control back, and I think that we will, ben, we're
5:26
Speaker 1: going to be able to hold these guys to account. Well,
5:28
Speaker 1: let's talk about a special prosecutor here. I'm not a
5:31
Speaker 1: big fan of special prosecutors. I think they've been weaponized
5:34
Speaker 1: and used too often in many cases. However, with Garland,
5:38
Speaker 1: he still is not put forth and I think he
5:41
Speaker 1: clearly should a special counsel to really look into this?
5:47
Speaker 1: Garland should appoint one. I don't think that he will.
5:50
Speaker 1: What power does the Senate have to basically force that
5:55
Speaker 1: hand to happen? And does it take a Republican majority
5:57
Speaker 1: in November to get really anything done? You know? I
6:01
Speaker 1: pressed him hard last week about it and the criteria
6:04
Speaker 1: that he would used to evaluate whether to appoint a
6:06
Speaker 1: special counsel. I mean, if you think about the conflicts here,
6:09
Speaker 1: I'm with you, Ben, I think they've the special counsel
6:11
Speaker 1: has power has been abused and weaponized too many times
6:14
Speaker 1: in the past. But if you think about the conflict
6:16
Speaker 1: of interest, You've got the president's own family under investigation.
6:20
Speaker 1: You've got the president, who is the boss of the
6:22
Speaker 1: Attorney General, basically telling the Attorney General through the media
6:25
Speaker 1: and directly, my son did nothing wrong. You know, I
6:28
Speaker 1: asked Garlin, I said, what if the president were to
6:30
Speaker 1: call you into the Oval office and tell you that
6:34
Speaker 1: his son did nothing wrong? You know, would that be
6:36
Speaker 1: appropriate under these circumstances? He said absolutely not. Well, I said,
6:40
Speaker 1: fmc's doing the same thing about having a chief staff
6:42
Speaker 1: go on TV, having the White House Press Secretary come
6:44
Speaker 1: on TV and saying the same things, how do you
6:48
Speaker 1: deal with that conflict of interest? And I said, how
6:49
Speaker 1: would you then think through appointing a special counsel? He
6:52
Speaker 1: just deflected and would not answer. When the Republicans take charge,
6:56
Speaker 1: we're going to have control of their budget. We're going
6:57
Speaker 1: to be able to put a lot more pressure on
6:59
Speaker 1: the attorney general. You know, an next prosecutor said that
7:02
Speaker 1: a Hunter Biden special counsel at this point, he believes,
7:05
Speaker 1: quote is a must. Andrew McCarthy explained to The Hill
7:09
Speaker 1: newspaper in his word words quote, there is a bulletproof
7:13
Speaker 1: case for the appointment of a special counsel under regulations
7:18
Speaker 1: that are supposed to bind the Justice Department. Millions of
7:21
Speaker 1: dollars allegedly poured into the Biden family from foreign sources
7:26
Speaker 1: tied to corrupt and authoritarian governments, and Joe Biden had
7:30
Speaker 1: to know his son was trading on his political influence
7:34
Speaker 1: since the controlling federal regulations dictate that a special counsel
7:38
Speaker 1: must be appointed. The longer Garland fights that, the more
7:41
Speaker 1: it increases suspicion that the president's hands may not be clean.
7:46
Speaker 1: Do you believe based on what you have seen? Is
7:49
Speaker 1: there any way possible that the president could have not
7:53
Speaker 1: known that his son, his brother, his sister were trading
7:59
Speaker 1: on the Ami name, that he was playing golf with
8:02
Speaker 1: business associates, that he had his son traveling on airplanes
8:06
Speaker 1: to meet with top officials, and not only Ukraine but
8:09
Speaker 1: in China, getting billions of dollars in loans, and also
8:13
Speaker 1: in Mexico having meetings, taking pictures of these people in
8:17
Speaker 1: the lobby of these hotels where they were going. I mean,
8:19
Speaker 1: the list of things that he would have had to
8:21
Speaker 1: be stupid and understand what was happening, having meetings with
8:24
Speaker 1: Bob Olenski and others in La Is there any conceivable
8:28
Speaker 1: way center that you think that the President's line that
8:31
Speaker 1: I didn't know anything was happening is possible at this point. No,
8:35
Speaker 1: I don't think it's possible in any way. And any
8:38
Speaker 1: person with a business background like meet knows that there's
8:41
Speaker 1: no way that you, Joe Biden could not have known
8:44
Speaker 1: this dealing with all of Hunters business associates. When you
8:46
Speaker 1: stay Hunter was on plane, he was on taxpayer of
8:49
Speaker 1: funded planes air Force to fly to China meeting with
8:52
Speaker 1: Hunters business partners that then set up, you know, a
8:55
Speaker 1: company that probably put billions of dollars into at least
8:59
Speaker 1: under the control of Hunter Biden, millions into his pocket.
9:02
Speaker 1: You know, right after as president Biden met wishes Uking
9:05
Speaker 1: right that it was announced a hundred then divested his
9:08
Speaker 1: interest in this company that he owned in partnership with
9:10
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party entities. How much property did you make?
9:14
Speaker 1: You know when did you sell it? Exactly? Nobody knows,
9:16
Speaker 1: except these meetings are all happening in very close proximity
9:19
Speaker 1: to access that people are able to obtain to Joe Biden.
9:22
Speaker 1: It's very clear this is a pay to play type
9:25
Speaker 1: of operation. It's a criminal operation. Again, Hunters already under
9:28
Speaker 1: criminal investigation. But it doesn't stop a hunter. It goes
9:31
Speaker 1: all the way to the big guy. Because the big
9:33
Speaker 1: guy is the source of the access, that's the source
9:35
Speaker 1: of the power, and that, frankly, is the reason why
9:37
Speaker 1: a company of like Barisma would pay someone with no
9:39
Speaker 1: experience like Hunter Biden a million dollars a year. You know,
9:42
Speaker 1: why is Hunter Biden getting checks the millions of dollars
9:45
Speaker 1: the Mayor of Russia's wife. This is way too hard
9:48
Speaker 1: to explain unless you realize what's really happening here. And
9:51
Speaker 1: that's access. You're a former ambassador, and you understand how
9:56
Speaker 1: decisions made in the US can affect foreign policy, probably
10:00
Speaker 1: more than a lot of other centers, just because of
10:03
Speaker 1: that experience. And when I look at what's happening in Russia,
10:09
Speaker 1: what's tapping in Ukraine, what's happening with China right now?
10:13
Speaker 1: And knowing that, and we saw this audio that came
10:17
Speaker 1: out of Hunter Biden taping a sexual encounter with a
10:20
Speaker 1: Russian prostitute. He forgot to turn that laptop off that
10:24
Speaker 1: was recording him. That video has now come out talking
10:28
Speaker 1: to that prostitute about how Russians had stolen another one
10:32
Speaker 1: of his laptops. If it had anything close to what
10:34
Speaker 1: the laptop he left in this repair shop had on it,
10:39
Speaker 1: there could be a treasure trove of information the Russians
10:42
Speaker 1: could use to blackmail the president and to blackmail the
10:47
Speaker 1: president's family. How much does it concern you that our
10:50
Speaker 1: foreign policy is being dictated by quite possibly blackmail, Because
10:55
Speaker 1: in his own words, he's like, Yeah, the Russians, this
10:57
Speaker 1: Russian guy, they got my laptop. It's gone. They stole it.
11:00
Speaker 1: I mean he's telling this to a Russian prostitute. This
11:03
Speaker 1: has got to be from a national security standpoint, something
11:06
Speaker 1: that should independently be investigated. Then it's deeply concerning, and
11:12
Speaker 1: this White House seems to have no qualms about national
11:15
Speaker 1: security issues. Look, I had to go through and get
11:17
Speaker 1: a top secret security clearance, had to go through the
11:19
Speaker 1: process to be cleared to do the job I did
11:22
Speaker 1: in the previous administration. You had to have a security
11:24
Speaker 1: clearance to do that. It's a lot of work that
11:26
Speaker 1: goes into it. One of the things they look at
11:28
Speaker 1: is whether you could potentially be subject to some type
11:30
Speaker 1: of undue foreign influence, and this is clearly one of
11:33
Speaker 1: those situations. It disqualifying. Uh, you know, it's this qualifying
11:37
Speaker 1: point is that we're uncovered somebody would not get their
11:40
Speaker 1: clearance to serve in a given administration. And here you
11:42
Speaker 1: have the big guy. You know that that is obviously
11:46
Speaker 1: you know, at least with this evidence, got real questions.
11:49
Speaker 1: It goes all the way to the top about whether
11:51
Speaker 1: he should even qualify to be, you know, to have
11:53
Speaker 1: access to the type of information you need the president
11:56
Speaker 1: to access to make critical decisions, because he could be
12:00
Speaker 1: compromise with blackmail, as you say, the type of information
12:04
Speaker 1: that these other governments may have you think about the
12:07
Speaker 1: Chinese Commist party controls these that are Hunter's partners. Who
12:11
Speaker 1: knows what's transpired between these between these companies and what
12:14
Speaker 1: they have on Joe Biden and his family, and we
12:16
Speaker 1: trace it all the way back to Joe Biden's expenses
12:19
Speaker 1: that have been covered by Hunter. It gets way too
12:22
Speaker 1: close to a company. I want to get to what's
12:24
Speaker 1: going on at the border. We clearly have a border crisis,
12:29
Speaker 1: and the Biden administration created this crisis on purpose. They
12:33
Speaker 1: this is not a surprise to them. I think people
12:35
Speaker 1: need to understand this. They wanted a fully open border.
12:38
Speaker 1: They wanted to undo everything that was working at the border.
12:42
Speaker 1: They that under Biden I mean or under Trump, to
12:45
Speaker 1: stop things like this from happening with an onslaught of
12:49
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants coming across the border. They know that fetnell
12:53
Speaker 1: is coming across the border at record numbers, more than
12:56
Speaker 1: enough to kill every American on a regular basis, which
13:00
Speaker 1: again is scary. They don't care. They know that the
13:02
Speaker 1: fetnyl and that is coming from and the chemicals are
13:05
Speaker 1: coming from China directly the drug cartels in Mexico, and
13:09
Speaker 1: this is putting an entire country at risk more than
13:13
Speaker 1: we've ever seen because of how deadly, how lethal fetnyl is.
13:16
Speaker 1: Then you've got these rules that were put in place
13:20
Speaker 1: under the Trump administration with COVID, that you made for
13:24
Speaker 1: you to be able to expedite people and send them
13:28
Speaker 1: back to the country of origin they came from very quickly.
13:31
Speaker 1: They want that to end because they want another onslaught
13:34
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants coming into America. This is all being
13:37
Speaker 1: done by design, and some people I think have really
13:40
Speaker 1: missed that boat centers. They don't realize this isn't because
13:43
Speaker 1: they're stupid. This is their game plan. And when you
13:48
Speaker 1: see where they're wanting to move forward with this, and
13:50
Speaker 1: we know that the border patrol is saying they're not
13:52
Speaker 1: just overrun, but it's a humanitarian crisis, what can Congress do?
13:57
Speaker 1: What can you guys do to stop this? And they
14:00
Speaker 1: know because this is being done deliberately on purpose by
14:03
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party in the president. Well, you've hit it
14:08
Speaker 1: very well. And people often asked me why did they
14:10
Speaker 1: allow this to happen. I let a group down early
14:13
Speaker 1: last month Tennessee sheriffs and mayors to see exactly what
14:17
Speaker 1: was happening, to help them see what was happening because
14:19
Speaker 1: they continually tell me then that each month is worse
14:22
Speaker 1: than the month before it in Tennessee in terms of
14:25
Speaker 1: the number of overdoses and the number of deaths from
14:27
Speaker 1: drug overdoses, and their counties in their cities. In Tennessee,
14:31
Speaker 1: I mean every town is a border town right now.
14:33
Speaker 1: Most of those overdoses by far are futonol related. Again,
14:36
Speaker 1: fluttonol coming from communist China through Mexico in partnership with
14:40
Speaker 1: the Mexican drug cartels, pumping it straight into the towns
14:43
Speaker 1: and cities across our nation. And the number one cause
14:45
Speaker 1: of death in America for young people between the ages
14:48
Speaker 1: of eighteen and forty five right now is drug overdose.
14:50
Speaker 1: Can you believe this drug overdoses now become the number
14:53
Speaker 1: one cause of death. Over one hundred thousand people killed
14:55
Speaker 1: just last year through drug overdoses. And the Big administration
14:59
Speaker 1: wants to look the other way as this massive flow
15:02
Speaker 1: of illstit drugs comes across the border. Why did happen?
15:05
Speaker 1: Why are we allowing this to happen? Well, as a
15:07
Speaker 1: business person, always look at say what are the incentives here?
15:10
Speaker 1: Who benefits from this? Well, you might say that the
15:13
Speaker 1: large corporate donors like to see you a flood of
15:16
Speaker 1: pressure coming in on the lower wag journals that's flooding
15:19
Speaker 1: across the border. That may keep wages down. That could
15:22
Speaker 1: perhaps be one incentive, one motivation. You look at the
15:25
Speaker 1: donor base there of corporate America and the Democrats and
15:28
Speaker 1: how close that may be. But I think the other
15:30
Speaker 1: thing is it really takes a little more explanation. If
15:33
Speaker 1: you think about where these sanctuary cities are located. Then
15:36
Speaker 1: you know, we've all heard about sanctuary cities in America,
15:38
Speaker 1: but where they are located. They're located in states where
15:41
Speaker 1: Democrats control the state legislatures. And when you get to
15:45
Speaker 1: the next census, a census that determines the number of
15:47
Speaker 1: congressional seats and the number of electoral votes based on
15:51
Speaker 1: the number of people, not citizens, but the number of
15:53
Speaker 1: people in a given state, and then those states can
15:56
Speaker 1: reallocate those seats based on what the state legislature says.
15:59
Speaker 1: It begins add up for your doesn't there about power?
16:03
Speaker 1: And they're willing to undertake hundred thousand deaths and overdoses
16:08
Speaker 1: a massive humanitarian crisis at the border. I mean, we
16:10
Speaker 1: saw young children, young women that had obviously been abused.
16:14
Speaker 1: They've been on journeys that taking them one two, sometimes
16:18
Speaker 1: more one or two months to get from you know,
16:21
Speaker 1: whatever home country they have across that border. The national
16:24
Speaker 1: security crisis been. When I was done in early April,
16:27
Speaker 1: they had already encountered one hundred and fifty seven different
16:30
Speaker 1: nationalities at that border. Since Joe Biden took office and
16:33
Speaker 1: collapsed our border, the numbers now up twe hundred and
16:35
Speaker 1: sixty four different nationalities there we are in early May.
16:38
Speaker 1: I mean, it's an incredible national security crisis that they're
16:41
Speaker 1: willing to endure just to change the math. That's where
16:44
Speaker 1: you look at the incentives is to change the math
16:47
Speaker 1: in America. On the electoral side, it is to fundamentally
16:51
Speaker 1: change the math and to change the way that our
16:53
Speaker 1: elections the outcomes, I guess you'd say, of our elections.
16:57
Speaker 1: And it's putting illegal amigr and people that are bringing
17:01
Speaker 1: the law ahead of the American citizens. And this administration.
17:06
Speaker 1: I had this debate the other day with somebody about
17:08
Speaker 1: the President's mind. They're like, look, the president, he's not
17:11
Speaker 1: trying to be bring drugs into this country. I said,
17:14
Speaker 1: I think the president is tone is nam or tone
17:17
Speaker 1: death to what drugs due to a family, and I
17:20
Speaker 1: used his son as the example. I think it's sad.
17:22
Speaker 1: I think I think Joe Biden took advantage of his
17:24
Speaker 1: son's addiction problems Hunter Biden and exploited them because he
17:29
Speaker 1: could do things that his brother wouldn't do and make money.
17:33
Speaker 1: Because he knew his son had an addiction and needed
17:35
Speaker 1: a massive amount of cash to keep those addictions up.
17:38
Speaker 1: He didn't try to stop his son from getting cash
17:40
Speaker 1: from all these deals trading off his name. He exploited it.
17:43
Speaker 1: And I really think they looked as almost like an alibi,
17:46
Speaker 1: and they we've seen this. We saw his sister do
17:48
Speaker 1: an interview just the other morning on a Sunday morning
17:51
Speaker 1: show talking about, you know how they're rooting for Hunter
17:53
Speaker 1: and he's had this addiction problem, and really laying out
17:56
Speaker 1: their case. They're going to claim he didn't know what
17:59
Speaker 1: he was doing, and he didn't know what he was
18:00
Speaker 1: doing in Russia, he didn't know what he was doing
18:02
Speaker 1: in Mexico, he didn't know what he was doing China
18:04
Speaker 1: because he was such an addict. They're exploiting his addiction.
18:07
Speaker 1: So I don't trust Joe Biden to stop the flow
18:11
Speaker 1: of fetno in the United It's America because he wouldn't
18:13
Speaker 1: even stop his son's addiction. In fact, I argue that
18:16
Speaker 1: they used it and exploited it to make more money
18:19
Speaker 1: off their son while he was an addict. It's such
18:23
Speaker 1: a sad situation. And you can't get Joe Biden to
18:25
Speaker 1: go to the border either. They won't even confront, They
18:28
Speaker 1: won't even look it in the eye. Joe Biden hasn't
18:30
Speaker 1: been to the border. Kamala Harris went to El Paso,
18:33
Speaker 1: twelve hundred miles away from what I was in the
18:35
Speaker 1: Rio brand when this is actually happening. They don't want
18:38
Speaker 1: to confront. The mainstream media that work with them won't
18:41
Speaker 1: cover it. And this is a massive national security crisis.
18:44
Speaker 1: It's the biggest national security risk we face as a nation,
18:47
Speaker 1: and they're willing to endure it again. They're exploiting this.
18:50
Speaker 1: And I think what you would you continue to touch
18:52
Speaker 1: upon in the previous segment we talked about the Biden
18:54
Speaker 1: family crime, Senator, They're an exploitative group. They're willing to
18:58
Speaker 1: exploit the American public, They're willing to exploit their office
19:01
Speaker 1: and the way you laid it up, then maybe even
19:03
Speaker 1: their own family numbers. Lastly, I want to move to
19:06
Speaker 1: the economy for a second Senator, and we've got a
19:08
Speaker 1: real problem with inflation. We have a real problem with
19:10
Speaker 1: our economy right now. We have twice as many people
19:14
Speaker 1: sitting out of work than the number of job openings
19:17
Speaker 1: that we have right now, there is a crisis when
19:21
Speaker 1: it comes to finding people that are even willing to work.
19:23
Speaker 1: The Democrats accomplish their goal of getting people addicted to
19:27
Speaker 1: government aid, that's very clear. Now. Now we've got inflation,
19:31
Speaker 1: We have the interest rates that have almost doubled in
19:34
Speaker 1: the last several months on home loans. This is changing
19:37
Speaker 1: people's buying power. This administration still spending and the Democrats
19:42
Speaker 1: are still spending money like drunken sailors, and it's putting
19:46
Speaker 1: us into Now. They want to give out all this
19:48
Speaker 1: money for people with college loans, right so you don't
19:51
Speaker 1: have to pay them off, And that's just bribing people,
19:53
Speaker 1: I think to vote for them in the midterm elections.
19:58
Speaker 1: Is there any way to bring in government spending at
20:01
Speaker 1: any point in the near future or is this just
20:03
Speaker 1: going to be a ticking time bomb that will explode
20:06
Speaker 1: and destroy our economy. Well, you know, if you think
20:10
Speaker 1: about it. Since I arrived in early last year, the
20:14
Speaker 1: Democrats have used a tool called reconciliation, which is a misnomer.
20:19
Speaker 1: Again in Washington, they've used this. It's a means for
20:21
Speaker 1: them to go through with a single party line vote,
20:24
Speaker 1: not any Republican support, the fifty Democrats plus Kamala Harris,
20:28
Speaker 1: and they've been able to ram through. They did at
20:29
Speaker 1: one point nine trillion dollars so called COVID relief package
20:33
Speaker 1: that had very little of anything to do with COVID relief,
20:36
Speaker 1: and we found out later that we didn't even have
20:38
Speaker 1: testing supplies in Ppe where it should have been. I mean,
20:41
Speaker 1: this is all about them ramming through more and more spending,
20:45
Speaker 1: creating more and more government dependence. They were even sending
20:47
Speaker 1: stimulus checks to people in jail, incarcerated people. This is
20:52
Speaker 1: their game plan, and they're talking about using it again.
20:55
Speaker 1: They're talking about using it again and until we regained
20:58
Speaker 1: control of the Senate, and that's not going to happen
21:00
Speaker 1: until the elections in November and we take back the
21:02
Speaker 1: Gabble in January. They're going to look at this as
21:05
Speaker 1: a path to continue to just recklessly spend and spend
21:08
Speaker 1: and spend and we're going to be fighting at every turn.
21:12
Speaker 1: If you think about what's happened with Title forty two,
21:14
Speaker 1: for example, we've been able to pull some Democrats over
21:16
Speaker 1: with us. Now you think about what happened with Bolling
21:18
Speaker 1: at the filibuster, we were able to pull Joe Mansion
21:20
Speaker 1: justin Cinema over with us. We're going to keep working
21:23
Speaker 1: to do that. But it's going to be a fight
21:26
Speaker 1: till the end of this year, no question about it. Last,
21:28
Speaker 1: very last question. I do want to get your thoughts
21:31
Speaker 1: on the Supreme Court leak. We do know that Chief
21:34
Speaker 1: Justice has said there will be an investigation. Will Congress
21:37
Speaker 1: be involved in having their own investigation into that? League?
21:40
Speaker 1: That was unprecedented, has been cheered and not condemned by
21:43
Speaker 1: the White House or any Democratic leadership so far. Yeah,
21:48
Speaker 1: it's amazing that Democrats are going to be silent on this.
21:51
Speaker 1: Another attempt to destroy yet another institution of America. This
21:55
Speaker 1: time they're trying to destroy the Supreme Court. They're willing
21:58
Speaker 1: to do this to get their way. Um. You know,
22:01
Speaker 1: I was pleased to see Justice Roberts saying that he's
22:03
Speaker 1: going to have an investigation. I've been a business leader
22:07
Speaker 1: if you're the CEO of an operation and by or
22:09
Speaker 1: Justice Roberts, I would have had everybody in there that
22:12
Speaker 1: night as soon as it was discovered. Get your cell
22:14
Speaker 1: phones out, let's see your computers. I would have had
22:16
Speaker 1: everything to find out. You know, we're going to stay
22:18
Speaker 1: here until we get to the bottom of who did this.
22:21
Speaker 1: They have allowed the Supreme Court to now become, you know,
22:25
Speaker 1: weaponized again. What they're trying to do is put pressure
22:28
Speaker 1: on the justices to overturn what they think will be
22:32
Speaker 1: a verne that's favorable to overturning row b Way, which
22:34
Speaker 1: is in my view, a very poorly decided case a
22:38
Speaker 1: long time ago. You know, I'm certainly pro life. The
22:42
Speaker 1: outcome there is something that the Democrats hate, and they're
22:45
Speaker 1: going to use that to try to make another excuse
22:48
Speaker 1: to book Bilibuster this year. I fully expect that as well.
22:51
Speaker 1: So we're going to have to be ready on all fronts.
22:55
Speaker 1: I think the Supreme Court is the logical place for
22:58
Speaker 1: this investigation to start, but we need to be looking
23:00
Speaker 1: at ourselves at what's taking place here in any sort
23:03
Speaker 1: of oversight mechanism that we can get. Certainly after November
23:06
Speaker 1: we need to exercise the Senator, I appreciate your time
23:09
Speaker 1: as always, thank you for talking with us on these
23:11
Speaker 1: very important issues, and good luck fighting this fight because
23:14
Speaker 1: it's a tough one. Thank you, sir. Somebody decided on
23:17
Speaker 1: the left to leak the document, leak the opinion that
23:21
Speaker 1: was being written at the Supreme Court. They knew that
23:24
Speaker 1: if they leaked this document it would put the lives
23:27
Speaker 1: of Supreme Court justices and their families at risk, and
23:30
Speaker 1: they didn't care because they're about mob ro. And if
23:33
Speaker 1: you don't think Democrats are advocating and supporting this unprecedented
23:38
Speaker 1: leak at the Supreme Court, which completely, by the way,
23:41
Speaker 1: undermines the rule of law of the Supreme Court, I
23:44
Speaker 1: want you to listen to what Chuck Schumer had to say.
23:47
Speaker 1: He said, this is the day we never thought would happen,
23:49
Speaker 1: but now that it has with Roe v. Wade, we're
23:52
Speaker 1: gonna fight. This day would never come, but this day
23:56
Speaker 1: has come, and we will fight it all the way.
24:00
Speaker 1: There it is, we will fight it all the way now.
24:02
Speaker 1: He says it this way for obvious reasons. He's ready
24:06
Speaker 1: for a fight. And whoever the Democrat was that leaked this,
24:10
Speaker 1: whichever person it was that leaked this. It is very clear.
24:13
Speaker 1: It is very obvious they knew what they were doing
24:16
Speaker 1: and they didn't care. Now, Republican leader Mitch McConnell came
24:25
Speaker 1: out and had a link the statement, a statement that
24:27
Speaker 1: I think was one of his best statements I've ever
24:30
Speaker 1: heard him talk about or say. And I want you
24:33
Speaker 1: to hear what he had to say in response to
24:35
Speaker 1: this unprecedented move for mobrel anarchy and the attacking of
24:42
Speaker 1: the justices on the court that they disagree with that.
24:44
Speaker 1: Let me also say something else. There's been a big
24:46
Speaker 1: lie going around for the last several hours, a lie
24:50
Speaker 1: really since this broke. The news broke and Politico broke
24:54
Speaker 1: the news, which they should have, by the way, never
24:56
Speaker 1: ever have run with. And this idea is that a
24:59
Speaker 1: board is going to be illegal in this country because
25:02
Speaker 1: of Roe v. Way being overturned. That's just not true.
25:05
Speaker 1: There are going to be abortions. They are going to
25:06
Speaker 1: be allowed in the United States of America, in liberal states.
25:09
Speaker 1: This is about a states rights issue. The federal government
25:11
Speaker 1: should have never gotten into the business with Roe v.
25:16
Speaker 1: Wade the way they did. They should have made it
25:18
Speaker 1: a state's rights issue. And that's all that has happened
25:21
Speaker 1: here is they're returning this to states. There are liberal states.
25:23
Speaker 1: They're gonna allow for abortions. They're gonna allow for abortions
25:26
Speaker 1: on demand. Now that will be challenged, but it will
25:28
Speaker 1: still be abortions that are going to be able to
25:30
Speaker 1: be allowed in the United States of America. So when
25:33
Speaker 1: you hear people saying if they're gonna bean abortions and
25:35
Speaker 1: people are gonna go to back alleys and they're gonna
25:37
Speaker 1: die right to fearmonger you into thinking, well, we should
25:41
Speaker 1: just keep abortions. Know that they're lying to you. Listen
25:45
Speaker 1: to what the Mitch McConnell, the leader of the Republican
25:47
Speaker 1: Party in the Senate, had to say earlier. For years,
25:51
Speaker 1: the radical left has attacked the institution of the Supreme Court.
25:56
Speaker 1: Last night, it appears their campaign yet a new love. Historically,
26:01
Speaker 1: the justices, clerks, and staff have prized and protected the
26:06
Speaker 1: Court's confidentiality. The justices must be able to discuss and
26:12
Speaker 1: deliberate in an environment of total trust and privacy. Americans
26:18
Speaker 1: cannot receive a fair trial if politicians, pundits, bullies, and
26:24
Speaker 1: mobs get a say in court. Judicial independence is vital,
26:30
Speaker 1: but the far left has spent years shamelessly attacking it.
26:34
Speaker 1: Democrats in Congress have endorsed plans for partisan court packing.
26:38
Speaker 1: They've sent the justices threatening legal briefs. They've scheduled sham
26:42
Speaker 1: hearings to smear judges. In twenty twenty, the Senate Democratic
26:47
Speaker 1: leader marched across the street to the Court and shouted threats,
26:52
Speaker 1: threats at multiple justices by name if they didn't rule
26:58
Speaker 1: how he wanted. Twenty eighteen, activists literally chased senators around
27:04
Speaker 1: the Capitol, and now last night, a shocking, shocking new breach. Somebody,
27:12
Speaker 1: likely somebody inside the Court itself, leaked a confidential internal
27:17
Speaker 1: draft to the press, almost certainly in an effort to
27:21
Speaker 1: stir up an inappropriate pressure campaign to sway an outcome.
27:27
Speaker 1: The radical left immediately rallied around the toxic stunt. The
27:31
Speaker 1: cheerleaders for partisan court packing applauded what they suggested was
27:36
Speaker 1: the work of quote, a brave clerk making a last
27:42
Speaker 1: ditch hail Mary attempt to cause a political firestorm and
27:47
Speaker 1: cause the Court to reconsider. Liberals want to rip the
27:52
Speaker 1: blindfold off Lady Justice. They want to override impartialogy within Timo.
28:01
Speaker 1: They want to elevate mob rule over the rule of law.
28:07
Speaker 1: The same political movement that used a leak to move
28:11
Speaker 1: up the timeline of justice Briar's retirement process is trying
28:16
Speaker 1: to use yet another leak to make the court less
28:20
Speaker 1: secure and less impartial. Never before, never before in modern
28:26
Speaker 1: history has an internal draft been leaked to the public
28:31
Speaker 1: while the justices were still deciding a case. Never before,
28:38
Speaker 1: whoever committed this lawless act knew exactly what it could
28:44
Speaker 1: bring about. The justices already require security. Less than two
28:50
Speaker 1: weeks ago, an unbalanced person lit himself on fire on
28:53
Speaker 1: the court steps. Less than three years ago, a liberal
28:58
Speaker 1: mob tried to storm the court, shoving past law enforcement
29:03
Speaker 1: and pounding on the doors. Look, everybody knows what kind
29:10
Speaker 1: of climate the far left is trying to fuel. One
29:14
Speaker 1: that is antithetical, antithetical to the rule of law. Right
29:19
Speaker 1: on q top, democrats began publishing wild statements about what
29:24
Speaker 1: the Court might decide, packed with using unhinged rhetoric that
29:30
Speaker 1: could easily incite light a match. So what else happened?
29:37
Speaker 1: Activists flocked to the court. An angry crowd surrounded the court,
29:44
Speaker 1: chanting justice's names, very knewed calls to smash the institutions
29:50
Speaker 1: of both the Senate and the Court. At the same time,
29:55
Speaker 1: one of the Court's most essential and sacred features is smashed,
30:01
Speaker 1: just to buy the outrage industrial complex a few extra
30:06
Speaker 1: days to scream nonsense about what the Court might rule.
30:13
Speaker 1: This law's action should be investigated, unpunished, to the fullest
30:18
Speaker 1: extent possible, the fullest extent possible. I'm certain the Chief
30:25
Speaker 1: Justice will seek to get to the bottom of this.
30:28
Speaker 1: If a crime was committed, the Department of Justice must
30:33
Speaker 1: pursue it completely. So listen, I want all nine Justices
30:39
Speaker 1: to know there are still principal Senators who have their
30:43
Speaker 1: backs no matter what. There are still some people in
30:48
Speaker 1: this capital and the majority in the Senate whose support
30:53
Speaker 1: for the rule of law is not conditional. Not conditional.
30:58
Speaker 1: The Court should tune out the bad faith noise and
31:02
Speaker 1: feel completely free to do their jobs. They should follow
31:07
Speaker 1: the fox and the law wherever that leads. As I've
31:13
Speaker 1: warned in the past, courts bowing to activist pressure would
31:18
Speaker 1: never enhance judicial legitimacy. It could only erode it, and
31:25
Speaker 1: the hostage checkers would never settle for half a loath.
31:30
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell absolutely right. The Supreme court and the way
31:35
Speaker 1: that these people went rogue leaking this opinion that shows
31:40
Speaker 1: that they will overall. Roe v. Wade is clearly done
31:44
Speaker 1: with the intents at the bare minimum of putting so
31:47
Speaker 1: much pressure on maybe a justice who is on the
31:53
Speaker 1: quote unquote fence right maybe keyword, maybe on the fence
31:58
Speaker 1: into changing their vote. Objective number one, number two is
32:03
Speaker 1: to try to intimidate them. This is no different than
32:06
Speaker 1: juror intimidation, right. You find jurors, you threaten things, you
32:10
Speaker 1: threaten their family, you tell them you're going to come
32:12
Speaker 1: after them, or you play on their conscience that people
32:15
Speaker 1: are going to die because of the decision they make.
32:18
Speaker 1: We've seen this happen all over the country where there
32:21
Speaker 1: are people that are willing to convict a police officer
32:23
Speaker 1: or something just because they don't want riots and looting
32:25
Speaker 1: in their city. They don't want people to die in
32:27
Speaker 1: their city. It is pressure, political pressure in a disgusting form,
32:33
Speaker 1: and that is exactly what happened. That this is unpressed
32:35
Speaker 1: now the person who did this, and apparently the FBI
32:38
Speaker 1: is now looking into this, and I hope that the
32:40
Speaker 1: FBI actually is unpartisan and does their job to find
32:44
Speaker 1: this leaker. Because they will be able to figure it out.
32:47
Speaker 1: And I hope that's exactly what happens here. It is exactly,
32:50
Speaker 1: by the way, what needs to happen. But what we
32:53
Speaker 1: have witnessed right, what we have watched, what we have
32:56
Speaker 1: seen from the left is they are willing to destroy
32:59
Speaker 1: anyone's life, including Supreme Court justices, and put their lives
33:03
Speaker 1: at risk so that they can hold America hostage. This
33:05
Speaker 1: is no different than what they did to Donald Trump
33:07
Speaker 1: with Russian Collision, when they knew the entire time the
33:09
Speaker 1: story was crap. Make no mistake that leaking of the
33:13
Speaker 1: Scotus decision is unprecedented and it was obviously done by
33:17
Speaker 1: a liberal justice to pressure one of the conservatives to
33:21
Speaker 1: change their mind. And the left will stop at nothing
33:24
Speaker 1: to protect their right to murder the innocent. This is
33:28
Speaker 1: just the beginning for them, and it's going to get very,
33:32
Speaker 1: very ugly. It's going to get demonic. As one person
33:36
Speaker 1: sent a line, if they overturned revieweight, it's about eight,
33:39
Speaker 1: it's about to hit a wild you've never seen before.
33:43
Speaker 1: That is a threat from Democrats. Make sure you share
33:47
Speaker 1: a podcast, Please write to say five star review so
33:49
Speaker 1: that more people will actually here. Today's podcast. Please let
33:53
Speaker 1: your family and friends know about it. Hit that subscriber
33:56
Speaker 1: auto download button, and I'll see you back here tomorrow