Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Facebook Files Show the WH Pressured FB to Censor Specific Americans on it's Platform plus Takeaways from the Hunter Biden Plea Deal Fallout

Transcript

Facebook Files Show the WH Pressured FB to Censor Specific Americans on it's Platform plus Takeaways from the Hunter Biden Plea Deal Fallout · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: A lot of you have asked me the question on
0:03
Speaker 1: social media. You can always send me your questions. I
0:06
Speaker 1: love it when I get them from you. What's next?
0:09
Speaker 1: What happens? What are the takeaways from this shocking moment
0:13
Speaker 1: when Hunter Biden's plea deal evaporated, exploded into thin air.
0:18
Speaker 2: I'm going to explain to you exactly what is next.
0:21
Speaker 1: But before I get into that, there's some other big
0:24
Speaker 1: breaking news that is not being covered right now, and
0:27
Speaker 1: I want to bring it to you. Congressman Jim Jordan
0:31
Speaker 1: has just obtained Facebook files, and these files are now
0:37
Speaker 1: showing that White House, the White House pressured Facebook to
0:43
Speaker 1: censor specific Americans that they didn't like that we're saying
0:47
Speaker 1: things online.
0:49
Speaker 2: And they did it.
0:51
Speaker 1: These never before seen emails from within, meaning internally at
0:57
Speaker 1: Facebook have now been obtained by the House Judiciary Committee
1:02
Speaker 1: Chairman Jim Jordan and is now shedding light on how
1:06
Speaker 1: the White House and specifically Biden appointed government officials pressure
1:13
Speaker 1: the tech giant to infringe on the First Amendment rights
1:17
Speaker 1: of countless Americans that they didn't like politically. Breitbart is
1:23
Speaker 1: now reporting that Facebook initially resisted the Judiciary Committee's subpoena
1:30
Speaker 1: of internal communications about White House pressure that led the
1:35
Speaker 1: committee and the chairman Jim Jordan, to schedule a vote
1:39
Speaker 1: to hold Mark Zuckerberg in contempt of Congress if his
1:42
Speaker 1: company did not turn over the documents that they have requested.
1:48
Speaker 1: After this threat of congressional censure, Facebook appears to have
1:52
Speaker 1: turned over those required documents, which reveal more of the
1:57
Speaker 1: Biden administration's rious pressure campaign against the company to suppress
2:04
Speaker 1: discussion about important issues that are affecting Americans. Now we're
2:08
Speaker 1: not just talking about the Biden crime family. I want
2:11
Speaker 1: to be very clear. We're also talking about things like vaccines, COVID,
2:15
Speaker 1: the list goes on and on. In other words, if
2:18
Speaker 1: the White House has an agenda item or has a
2:22
Speaker 1: narrative out there or something that they do not like,
2:26
Speaker 1: they just went straight to Facebook and said, hey, here's
2:29
Speaker 1: the person we need you to shut down, and Facebook
2:33
Speaker 1: did it. Representative Jim Jordan posted the material in a
2:37
Speaker 1: long thread earlier today, saying, in April of twenty twenty one,
2:43
Speaker 1: a Facebook employee circulated an email from Facebook CEO Mark
2:47
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg to the CEO, the chief operating officer, Cheryl Samberg,
2:52
Speaker 1: writing quote, we are facing continued pressure from external stakeholders,
2:58
Speaker 1: including the White House, to remove posts. In another April
3:04
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one email, Nick Clegg, Facebook's president for Global Affairs,
3:10
Speaker 1: informed his team at Facebook that Andy Slavitt, a senior
3:15
Speaker 1: advisor to President Biden, was outraged that Facebook did not
3:20
Speaker 1: remove a particular post. When Clegg countered that removing content
3:26
Speaker 1: like that would represent a significant incursion into traditional boundaries
3:32
Speaker 1: of free expression in the US, Slavitt disregard the warning
3:36
Speaker 1: and the First Amendment. No surprise there that this White
3:40
Speaker 1: House doesn't believe in your First Amendment rights. What happened
3:45
Speaker 1: next is the big question. Facebook then panicked. In another
3:50
Speaker 1: April twenty twenty one email, Brian Rice, which is Facebook's
3:55
Speaker 1: vice president of public policy, raise the concern it Slavit's
4:00
Speaker 1: challenge felt quote very much like a crossroads for us
4:05
Speaker 1: with the Biden White House in these early days quote unquote,
4:09
Speaker 1: but Facebook wanted to repair its relationship with the White
4:13
Speaker 1: House to avoid adverse action, saying this quote, given what
4:18
Speaker 1: is at stake here, it would also be a good
4:20
Speaker 1: idea if we could regroup and take stock of where
4:24
Speaker 1: we are in our relations with the White House and
4:28
Speaker 1: our internal methods too. So Facebook gets pressure. White House
4:33
Speaker 1: basically puts out in essence of threat. Facebook understands this threat.
4:37
Speaker 1: Facebook then decides to do whatever the White House decides
4:40
Speaker 1: to do now. Representative Jordan also revealed that the White
4:45
Speaker 1: House demanded to know why Facebook had not censored a
4:52
Speaker 1: clip listen carefully from Tucker Carlson's show on Fox News
4:59
Speaker 1: and respond. Facebook was quote ready to tell the White
5:02
Speaker 1: House that it had demoted a video, meaning that you
5:07
Speaker 1: can't find it easily. It's not put out there on
5:09
Speaker 1: people's timelines. In other words, if a big tree falls
5:13
Speaker 1: in the forest and no one's around, did it make
5:15
Speaker 1: a noise? That's what Facebook did to Tucker Carlson's video.
5:19
Speaker 1: They demoted a video that was posted by Tucker Carlson
5:23
Speaker 1: by fifty percent quote unquote in response to the White
5:27
Speaker 1: House's demands, even though the post didn't violate any of
5:32
Speaker 1: Facebook's policies. So, in other words, the White House could
5:35
Speaker 1: just say, hey, we don't like this, it doesn't break
5:40
Speaker 1: any of Facebook's policies, and Facebook would then take it
5:43
Speaker 1: down anyway. Jordan also revealed that the US Surgeon General
5:50
Speaker 1: also intervened to ask why Facebook had not censored the
5:56
Speaker 1: so called disinformation doesn't a group of accounts questioning official
6:02
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen policy. The Judiciary Committee chairman also noted how
6:07
Speaker 1: difficult it was to obtain the information from Facebook, and
6:10
Speaker 1: we now know why Facebook. This was such damning information
6:14
Speaker 1: that every single person that's listening now understands that Facebook
6:17
Speaker 1: was literally taking orders from the government to silence people
6:21
Speaker 1: who broke no rules at all, solely based on what
6:24
Speaker 1: you were saying. Does a violation of your free speech? Quote?
6:29
Speaker 1: Only after the Committee announced its intention to hold Mark
6:32
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg in contempt did Facebook produce any internal documents to
6:36
Speaker 1: the committee, including these documents which proved that government pressure
6:42
Speaker 1: was directly responsible for censorship on Facebook.
6:47
Speaker 2: Jordan said, before I do that.
6:49
Speaker 1: Let me tell you about our good friends ofver COVID
6:51
Speaker 1: tax relief dot org. Look, you did the tough thing
6:54
Speaker 1: during COVID. You paid your people and pulled your business
6:57
Speaker 1: through the pandemic, and now doing the tough thing could
7:00
Speaker 1: qualify you for a twenty six thousand dollars per employee
7:05
Speaker 1: At COVID tax relief dot Org. Government funds are available
7:09
Speaker 1: to reward companies with two or more employees who stayed
7:13
Speaker 1: open during COVID. This is not a loan, and you
7:17
Speaker 1: don't have to pay it back. Look, this program is complicated,
7:20
Speaker 1: but nobody knows more about it than the CPAs and
7:23
Speaker 1: tax experts at Consumer Tax Advocates. The best part is
7:27
Speaker 1: you pay nothing upfront, They do all the work, and
7:30
Speaker 1: then they share percentage of cash that you get. Businesses
7:33
Speaker 1: of all types, including nonprofits and churches can qualify, including
7:37
Speaker 1: those who took PBP loans. Even if you had increases
7:41
Speaker 1: in sales, you did the tough thing for your employees
7:44
Speaker 1: during COVID Let COVID tax Relief dot org help get
7:48
Speaker 1: you up to twenty six thousand dollars per employee. Visit
7:52
Speaker 1: COVID tax Relief dot org. That's COVID tax Relief dot org.
7:56
Speaker 1: COVID tax Relief dot org. Now you put this into
8:01
Speaker 1: comparison with where we are now with social media. Anytime
8:05
Speaker 1: you put something up there that they don't like, they
8:07
Speaker 1: will silence, censor you, destroy your account, and threaten to
8:09
Speaker 1: shut down your account forever.
8:11
Speaker 2: How do I know this? It just happened to me.
8:15
Speaker 1: I posted an article or actually a picture that dealt
8:19
Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden. The people at Facebook clearly didn't like it.
8:24
Speaker 1: Now I have a warning on my account that tells
8:28
Speaker 1: me that there is a chance that my account could
8:31
Speaker 1: be shut down if I have quote any more violations.
8:35
Speaker 1: So the one point two million people that are on
8:40
Speaker 1: my account right now, they're saying, if I have another violation,
8:43
Speaker 1: they may shut down my account forever. The other thing
8:47
Speaker 1: we know is they have completely silenced the reach of
8:50
Speaker 1: our page. How do we know this? We posted a link,
8:54
Speaker 1: for example, to our podcast this morning. There's one point
8:57
Speaker 1: two million people on my page. The total interactions is
9:03
Speaker 1: eighty five. That's it, eighty five people. You're telling me
9:07
Speaker 1: that with one point two million people, only eighty five
9:10
Speaker 1: are going to interact with a post that I have.
9:13
Speaker 1: That's how you know that your page has been basically
9:16
Speaker 1: shut down even though you have it. It says when
9:19
Speaker 1: I log in, quote, don't lose your page. If you
9:23
Speaker 1: get a few more Community Standard violations, you could lose
9:26
Speaker 1: Ben Ferguson forever. That's said, since I'm Ben Ferguson, nobody
9:31
Speaker 1: wants that help out by appealing violations you disagree with,
9:34
Speaker 1: but more importantly, try to share content that follows the rules.
9:37
Speaker 1: They then go on to say, and it says, then
9:40
Speaker 1: your page quality page is at risk, Yes, pages at risk.
9:45
Speaker 2: So what is my violation?
9:46
Speaker 1: I posted a picture of Hunter Biden from his laptop
9:50
Speaker 1: that they said goes against our community standards. They said
9:55
Speaker 1: that I shared a piece of content because it was
9:57
Speaker 1: a blurred out naked Hunter Biden that went against our
10:01
Speaker 1: rules on sexual exploitation of adults.
10:04
Speaker 2: I'm not joking.
10:06
Speaker 1: Then below that it says your page is restricted because
10:10
Speaker 1: you didn't follow community's standards. We know we're not always right,
10:14
Speaker 1: so if you think we got it wrong, you can
10:15
Speaker 1: disagree with our decision and in some cases get the
10:18
Speaker 1: restriction removed.
10:20
Speaker 2: So we did that.
10:22
Speaker 1: The administration of Facebook disagreed and they said we're keeping
10:26
Speaker 1: it down. Then under that it says on our Facebook page,
10:29
Speaker 1: your pages at risk of being unpublished and has reduced
10:32
Speaker 1: distribution and other restrictions due to community standard violations. So
10:37
Speaker 1: I post a picture of Hunter Biden from his own
10:39
Speaker 1: laptop that's been in The picture been used in the media.
10:43
Speaker 1: It is blurred out of anything that would be sexual
10:46
Speaker 1: exploitation of an adult, and Facebook, because it's against Hunter Biden,
10:51
Speaker 1: accuses me of breaking the rules on sexual exploitation of adults.
10:57
Speaker 1: The same picture I use, which is blurred out is
11:00
Speaker 1: the same picture that's been used on the news. So
11:04
Speaker 1: the question is is that censorship. I'll let you decide. Now,
11:10
Speaker 1: if you apply what I just told you that Jim
11:14
Speaker 1: Jordan has exposed with Facebook to the Hunter Biden investigation
11:18
Speaker 1: that's now the Biden crime family investigation, it actually makes
11:22
Speaker 1: a lot of sense. This is why Hunter Biden believed,
11:26
Speaker 1: and his lawyers believed in the DOJ and the FBI
11:29
Speaker 1: and everybody else involved in this cover up believe they
11:32
Speaker 1: could get away with it because they could silence and
11:35
Speaker 1: censor any story they believe before it got too big.
11:38
Speaker 1: In fact, they could silence and sence of the biggest
11:40
Speaker 1: stories we've ever seen politically since Watergate. Now, if you
11:44
Speaker 1: look at Watergate and you go back and you actually
11:47
Speaker 1: just remember Watergate, go watch any of the movies on it,
11:50
Speaker 1: Go watch anything are the Pentagon files, the Pentagon papers,
11:54
Speaker 1: for example. You can watch that Washington Post article there.
11:58
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. I mean, it's true, unbelievable. Okay, it's incredible.
12:03
Speaker 1: And what you learn is what you realize is that
12:09
Speaker 1: this story is bigger than all of those, Okay, every
12:12
Speaker 1: the story is so much bigger. Then this story is
12:17
Speaker 1: than even Nixon and Watergate. What the Bidens have done
12:20
Speaker 1: selling access to America, What the Bidens have done selling
12:24
Speaker 1: us out, not just selling us out, but to our adversaries.
12:29
Speaker 2: Then if you.
12:30
Speaker 1: Look at them silencing and censoring, the story, the story
12:34
Speaker 1: that I'm talking about is a pretty clear story. The
12:37
Speaker 1: story that I'm referencing is the Biden laptop, the Hunter
12:42
Speaker 1: Byden laptop. You got to go back and remember it.
12:45
Speaker 1: They silence the whole damn thing. You couldn't post it,
12:49
Speaker 1: you couldn't tweet it, you could say something about it,
12:52
Speaker 1: but no one would see it on Facebook, all because
12:55
Speaker 1: the government got involved and went to big tech and said,
12:58
Speaker 1: silence it, censor it, shut it down.
13:01
Speaker 2: That's what happened. Like, that's the reality of the situation.
13:05
Speaker 1: And if you're the Bidens, then you probably thought, dude,
13:08
Speaker 1: we can get away with this plea deal. We can
13:09
Speaker 1: get away with this agreement, this proposal for this plea
13:13
Speaker 1: agreement which will give no jail time to Hunter Biden.
13:16
Speaker 1: And actually it's it's the best plea deal I've ever
13:19
Speaker 1: seen because it gave him protection from all other investigations
13:24
Speaker 1: and being charged with any of the other crimes like this.
13:27
Speaker 1: You couldn't have written a better deal for Hunter Biden
13:32
Speaker 1: or the Biden crime family.
13:33
Speaker 2: In fact, I would take this step further.
13:35
Speaker 1: If you knew that you could start a criminal enterprise,
13:38
Speaker 1: you could run that criminal enterprise for decades and then
13:41
Speaker 1: when you got caught, and if you knew you were
13:43
Speaker 1: gonna get caught, like if someone came and said, hey,
13:44
Speaker 1: you can be You can take bribes from anybody who
13:48
Speaker 1: want to around the world. You can sell access to
13:50
Speaker 1: America to anybody that's wanting to give you cash. But
13:53
Speaker 1: one day you're gonna get caught. And when you do,
13:55
Speaker 1: here's what's going to happen to you. You're gonna plead
13:58
Speaker 1: out to these estimators on things that have nothing to
14:01
Speaker 1: do with the worst crimes that you committed. And then
14:05
Speaker 1: you're going to get immunity from all your other sins
14:08
Speaker 1: that you've committed, all the other crimes you've committed in
14:11
Speaker 1: your past at that moment, and then you got to
14:13
Speaker 1: go clean. Ninety percent of I think people would take
14:17
Speaker 1: that deal. They would say, let me get this straight.
14:20
Speaker 1: I can start a criminal enterprise.
14:22
Speaker 2: Yes you can. Okay, so I can start a criminal enterprise.
14:26
Speaker 1: I can do whatever I want to I can sell
14:28
Speaker 1: American secrets or or our American favors.
14:32
Speaker 2: Maybe is a better way of putting it.
14:35
Speaker 1: And then when I get caught, you're telling me I
14:37
Speaker 1: won't go to jail and you'll give me a plea
14:39
Speaker 1: deal that protects me from all of the worst things
14:41
Speaker 1: that I ever did by charging me with the things
14:43
Speaker 1: that are no big deal to the point where I'm
14:45
Speaker 1: not going to go to jail.
14:46
Speaker 2: Yes, that's what we're saying.
14:49
Speaker 1: Now, if you think about that deal, Okay, you think
14:53
Speaker 1: about what that deal means. Every criminal would take that deal. Okay,
14:59
Speaker 1: let's let's just start with that. Like, every criminal would
15:04
Speaker 1: take that deal. Happily. They would take it because it's
15:08
Speaker 1: the best deal. You can't write it better. Well, now
15:11
Speaker 1: we know what was in this plea deal. Now we
15:13
Speaker 1: know it's in what was in it. And the reason
15:14
Speaker 1: why I know that is because Politico has obtained the
15:17
Speaker 1: document that was laying out the proposed plea deal that
15:20
Speaker 1: the federal judge blocked on Wednesday. I'm going to read
15:23
Speaker 1: from you from Politico. Hunter Biden's plea deal is on
15:26
Speaker 1: hold after judge raised questions Wednesday about the proposed plea
15:30
Speaker 1: agreement and a related agreement, known as a pre trial
15:32
Speaker 1: diversion program. Lawyers detailed aspects of the proposed deal in court,
15:38
Speaker 1: but the documents themselves have not been published on the
15:41
Speaker 1: court's docket. Why you can ask that question and guess
15:46
Speaker 1: the answer. Politico, however, obtained them and is publishing them here.
15:51
Speaker 1: Politico also obtained a transcript of Wednesday's hearing. It's also
15:55
Speaker 1: published below. Now, under the proposed plea agreement and a
15:59
Speaker 1: version of agreement, Biden would plead guilty to two misdemeanor
16:03
Speaker 1: tax charges and would be able to avoid punishment on
16:07
Speaker 1: a felony gun charge if he stayed out of trouble
16:09
Speaker 1: for two years, like this is the greatest deal ever.
16:12
Speaker 1: But attends court hearing, US District judge questioned the constitutionality
16:17
Speaker 1: of the diversion agreement and refuse to sign off on
16:19
Speaker 1: the deal at least for now. Lawyers are due back
16:22
Speaker 1: in court in several weeks to revisit the issue this
16:26
Speaker 1: plea agreement, and it's long. I want to make that clear, Okay,
16:30
Speaker 1: this this this plea, This plea agreement is one that
16:34
Speaker 1: is shocking to me because what it says in there
16:39
Speaker 1: is that in essence, we're going to hold them accountable
16:41
Speaker 1: for nothing that we know that he did criminally early on,
16:46
Speaker 1: and we're going to hold him accountable for some misdemeanors
16:49
Speaker 1: here that he won't go to jail for. And the
16:53
Speaker 1: fines are not even like real fines. It's almost a joke.
16:57
Speaker 1: That's the deal. When you read it. It also is like, oh,
17:02
Speaker 1: and by the way, if you take this deal, you
17:04
Speaker 1: can't charge them with any other crimes forever and ever,
17:07
Speaker 1: Amen that he did in the past. That's not how
17:10
Speaker 1: this is supposed to work. That's not how any of
17:13
Speaker 1: this is supposed to work. Now, before I get into
17:16
Speaker 1: more of this story, I want to say thank you
17:18
Speaker 1: and tell you about our good friends at Patriot Mobile.
17:20
Speaker 1: Every day we hear about another familiar brand selling out
17:24
Speaker 1: their customers and going all woke. Americans are sick and
17:28
Speaker 1: tired of having leftist propaganda jammed into every product we consume.
17:34
Speaker 1: Woke mobile companies are no different. For years, probably the
17:38
Speaker 1: cell phone provider you have right now has been dumping
17:40
Speaker 1: millions of dollars into liberal causes, including planned parenthood, and
17:45
Speaker 1: you had to deal with it because you had to
17:47
Speaker 1: have a.
17:47
Speaker 2: Cell phone and there was no alternative. Well not anymore.
17:50
Speaker 1: Now you can switch to Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian
17:54
Speaker 1: conservative wireless provider, offering dependable nationwide coverage on all three
18:00
Speaker 1: major network so you get the best possible coverage in
18:03
Speaker 1: your area, minus the low leftist propaganda. When you switch
18:08
Speaker 1: to Patriot Mobile, you're sending a message that you support
18:10
Speaker 1: free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life, the Second Amendment,
18:14
Speaker 1: and our military veterans and first responder heroes. They have
18:17
Speaker 1: one hundred percent US based customer service team that makes
18:20
Speaker 1: switching easy. You get to keep your same phone and
18:24
Speaker 1: your same phone number two or upgrade to a new
18:26
Speaker 1: phone if you want to go right now to Patriotmobile
18:30
Speaker 1: dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson,
18:36
Speaker 1: or call them eight seven eight Patriot. That's eight seven
18:40
Speaker 1: eight Patriot. Use the promo code ferguson and you will
18:44
Speaker 1: get the best deals of the year Patriot Mobile dot
18:47
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson or eight seven eight Patriot. Now, while
18:52
Speaker 1: all of this is happening, okay, well every bit of
18:56
Speaker 1: this is happening, the media is trying to figure out
18:58
Speaker 1: what the hell to do. They don't know how to
19:00
Speaker 1: cover this because they can't decide if they want to
19:02
Speaker 1: get rid of Hunter Biden or Joe Biden because he's
19:05
Speaker 1: such a political liability now, or if they want to
19:08
Speaker 1: just go back to Trump as bad Orange Man bad
19:10
Speaker 1: and we'll beat him that way. How do I know this,
19:14
Speaker 1: NBC News is Andrea Mitchell actually apologized to a Democratic
19:19
Speaker 1: senator because she mentioned Hunter Biden and Donald Trump at
19:25
Speaker 1: the same time while having an interview.
19:28
Speaker 2: I wish I was joking. I'm not listen though, to.
19:33
Speaker 3: Donald Trump and Hunter Biden. Actually, your reaction as a
19:39
Speaker 3: family friend, as a Delaware senator is a long time,
19:42
Speaker 3: you know, intimate of the Biden's to this. It's more
19:46
Speaker 3: than a hiccup. The deal fell apart and it has
19:49
Speaker 3: to be put back together again if he's going to
19:52
Speaker 3: figure out a way not to face a trial.
19:55
Speaker 4: Well, Andrew, you asked me to comment on both Donald
19:57
Speaker 4: Trump and Hunter Biden, and I'll speak briefly to their
20:00
Speaker 4: respective legal challenges. The press is reporting that Donald Trump,
20:05
Speaker 4: former President Trump's lawyers have been notified by Jack Smith
20:09
Speaker 4: that he may well be indicted in the coming day
20:13
Speaker 4: or two for his alleged role in the January sixth insurrection.
20:17
Speaker 4: Anne Hunter Biden, as you just referenced, had a hearing
20:22
Speaker 4: in front of a distrecord judge in Delaware about.
20:24
Speaker 2: A plea deal.
20:26
Speaker 4: The judge expressed some real concerns about the supervision of
20:30
Speaker 4: a piece of that agreement that would have allowed a
20:33
Speaker 4: Hunter to avoid any prosecution for a gun related offense.
20:37
Speaker 4: This is a common practice in prosecutions where your first
20:41
Speaker 4: time offender, the offense is related to drug abuse, and
20:45
Speaker 4: you enter into a supervision agreement or as long as
20:47
Speaker 4: you do not re offend in terms of anything involving
20:51
Speaker 4: owning weapons or substance abuse, that that record is expunged.
20:56
Speaker 4: This was not unusual, but in this particular case, judge
21:00
Speaker 4: was asking about who is going to supervise that that
21:03
Speaker 4: piece of it fell apart. I expect that they'll be
21:05
Speaker 4: back in front of the judge with a revised deal
21:08
Speaker 4: in a matter of weeks.
21:09
Speaker 2: Here's what now. Listen to Koons here.
21:12
Speaker 1: Okay, this is Biden's campaign co chair, Senator Chris Coons
21:17
Speaker 1: from Delaware. All right, he's asked about the failure to
21:20
Speaker 1: reach a plea deal in the Hunter Biden case.
21:23
Speaker 2: He's asked about this fell apart. This is a big deal.
21:26
Speaker 1: They understand how bad this And immediately he's like, ah,
21:28
Speaker 1: this isn't a big deal. Now he's asked about this
21:31
Speaker 1: and Donald Trump, because right, they need some sort of diversion.
21:34
Speaker 1: And now we're on grand jury watch for another indictment
21:38
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump, because that's what the left does, right,
21:41
Speaker 1: You nail them on something they've done, and they immediately say,
21:44
Speaker 1: all right, we'll go after Donald Trump again. We'll charge
21:45
Speaker 1: Donald Trump with some other other crimes and that'll take
21:48
Speaker 1: away from the Hunter Biden story, so it's not on
21:50
Speaker 1: the headlines anymore. So we'll go back to Orange. Man
21:53
Speaker 1: is bad. That's the plan each and every time. This
21:59
Speaker 1: second part this clip is amazing, right, he goes on
22:02
Speaker 1: at the first part, is like, wow, there's no problems here.
22:05
Speaker 1: They're going to figure this deal out. It's going to
22:07
Speaker 1: get done. We're not worried. Everything's fine. However, let me
22:10
Speaker 1: tell you something about Donald Trump. And second, how dare
22:14
Speaker 1: you bring up the two at the same time, acting
22:17
Speaker 1: like they should even be in the same sentence.
22:19
Speaker 2: Listen matters, Andrea.
22:21
Speaker 4: In one case, it is the former president who is
22:25
Speaker 4: trying to be the presidential nominee for the Republican Party.
22:28
Speaker 4: Who is facing very real legal challenges. In the other case,
22:32
Speaker 4: it's a private citizen, yes, the president's son, but someone
22:35
Speaker 4: who never served in the White House, who had no
22:37
Speaker 4: official role. I think that is a significant difference. None
22:41
Speaker 4: of this that relates to Hunter Biden and his history
22:44
Speaker 4: of substance abuse and his plea deal and the District
22:46
Speaker 4: Cord of Delaware relates to President By All of the
22:50
Speaker 4: charges that have already been laid against former President Trump
22:53
Speaker 4: in other contexts and that may soon be further advanced
22:56
Speaker 4: by an indictment, directly relates to the conduct of former
23:00
Speaker 4: President Trump in this case in office, conduct that resulted
23:04
Speaker 4: in an armed gang assaulting the building that I am
23:07
Speaker 4: in here in the United States Capitol.
23:10
Speaker 2: So let's just be clear.
23:12
Speaker 4: One is about the conduct of a former president in office,
23:15
Speaker 4: and the other is about a private citizen, the son
23:18
Speaker 4: of the current president.
23:19
Speaker 2: There's a stark difference.
23:21
Speaker 3: Now, you are absolutely correct, and I should not have
23:23
Speaker 3: analogized those two things together in my haste. There's no
23:28
Speaker 3: question that there are of very very different proportions. There's
23:33
Speaker 3: no comparison. What I meant to be asking you, in
23:37
Speaker 3: my defense, is are you concerned about the House Republicans
23:40
Speaker 3: trying to make much of this now and saying that
23:43
Speaker 3: there is something to be investigated that could warrant in
23:47
Speaker 3: opening an impeachment inquiry of the sitting president of the
23:50
Speaker 3: United States based on the fact that there is an ongoing.
23:52
Speaker 2: But by the way, give me this out there.
23:54
Speaker 1: Does it not sound like Andrew Mitchell has now become
23:56
Speaker 1: the female version of Joe Biden. She can barely get
23:59
Speaker 1: a sentence out, like it's like she's almost going to
24:02
Speaker 1: fall asleep the entire time she's doing the interview. And
24:06
Speaker 1: then she apologized, like, I am so sorry I brought
24:09
Speaker 1: that up that way. I didn't mean to bring that up.
24:11
Speaker 1: You're right, there's no comparison between the two. I would argue,
24:14
Speaker 1: actually that that's correct, but not for the same logic
24:17
Speaker 1: or the reason they're.
24:17
Speaker 2: Saying that it's somehow different.
24:19
Speaker 1: I would say that what she's saying is accurate, and
24:22
Speaker 1: what she's saying is correct only in the perspective, okay,
24:27
Speaker 1: that what has happened with Hunter Biden and Joe Biden
24:31
Speaker 1: and the Biden crime family is so egregious, is so
24:36
Speaker 1: egregious compared to what Donald Trump has not done. That
24:45
Speaker 1: is the difference here, and I think everybody understands that.
24:50
Speaker 1: I think everybody should understand it and gets the difference here.
24:55
Speaker 1: The difference is very significant in these two scenario.
25:01
Speaker 2: It's ridiculous to.
25:04
Speaker 1: Imply that Hunter Biden is the same as Donald Trump, right, Like, yes,
25:10
Speaker 1: I agree, because what Hunter Biden did is is completely
25:15
Speaker 1: he sold out the United States of America.
25:17
Speaker 2: That's a simple way of putting it.
25:19
Speaker 1: He sold out the United States of America to the
25:22
Speaker 1: highest bidder on multiple occasions, right, on multiple occasions, multiple
25:28
Speaker 1: times he sold them out.
25:31
Speaker 2: He sold him out, and he said, see ya, he
25:34
Speaker 2: sold him out.
25:34
Speaker 1: And he was like, yeah, absolutely, ten million. Yeah, we'll fire,
25:40
Speaker 1: We'll get people in your own and your country fired,
25:43
Speaker 1: and we'll hold up American loans in Ukraine. Chinese communist government. Yeah,
25:47
Speaker 1: we'll take your money. We love a billion dollar loans,
25:50
Speaker 1: We love millions of dollars to go directly into our
25:53
Speaker 1: bank accounts. This sounds amazing to us. Absolutely, let's do it.
25:59
Speaker 1: Sign us up. They are very different. But when you
26:03
Speaker 1: hear Andrew and Mitchell, this is apologizing for asking about
26:06
Speaker 1: the two different legal woes. There's also one other thing
26:09
Speaker 1: I want to mention real quick, because I think this
26:10
Speaker 1: is really important. So you understand that there is there
26:14
Speaker 1: was an obsession today that Donald Trump was going to
26:17
Speaker 1: get indicted and they had like this ticker up on
26:20
Speaker 1: TV of the grand jury watch and a building, a
26:23
Speaker 1: random building on on two of the liberal networks today.
26:25
Speaker 1: I saw that, and it just tells you how much
26:31
Speaker 1: the media is willing to carry water for the Biden
26:36
Speaker 1: crime family like that. They'll do anything. They'll change headlines, right,
26:41
Speaker 1: They'll they'll put up a box of a grand jury watch.
26:44
Speaker 1: And so it's like, all right, well if you if
26:46
Speaker 1: if Joe Biden's bad, then we're gonna make sure the
26:49
Speaker 1: other side's bad too, Right, if Joe Biden's in trouble,
26:53
Speaker 1: or the Biden crime families in trouble, then just know
26:55
Speaker 1: we're gonna we're gonna make sure that other people are
26:57
Speaker 1: in trouble too. That that's the that's a game plan here,
27:01
Speaker 1: that that's how they're going to try to I guess
27:04
Speaker 1: the best way to say is survive this, right, this
27:08
Speaker 1: is this is how you survive it. You put all
27:12
Speaker 1: this together and you say, well, you think are guys bad?
27:16
Speaker 1: We just indicted your guy, and your guy is Donald Trump.
27:21
Speaker 1: I expect Donald Trump, by the way, to be indicted.
27:23
Speaker 1: I don't know if it's going to be this week. Okay,
27:26
Speaker 1: I'll be clear about that. I have no idea if
27:28
Speaker 1: it's going to be this week. But if it is
27:30
Speaker 1: this week, you got to really sit there and go,
27:33
Speaker 1: come on, you guys can't even fake it for a week.
27:37
Speaker 1: You guys are so desperate to undermine the President of
27:41
Speaker 1: the United States of America, former President Donald Trump, that
27:44
Speaker 1: you're willing to when when you have the worst week
27:46
Speaker 1: for the Biden crime family, you then indict Donald Trump
27:49
Speaker 1: as political cover because that's what it is.
27:53
Speaker 2: There is no shame, by the way, and there are
27:56
Speaker 2: no rules.
27:57
Speaker 1: There is no ethics or morals involved with any of
28:01
Speaker 1: these individuals. They called for goodness sakes, they called you
28:06
Speaker 1: look at the pre deal and what would disappeared out
28:08
Speaker 1: of this plea deal? You had the lawyers representing the
28:15
Speaker 1: Bidens called the courthouse and act like they were on
28:19
Speaker 1: the other side to get something taken out so the
28:23
Speaker 1: judge couldn't see it. And they got busted doing that,
28:26
Speaker 1: and no one got sent to jail, and no one
28:29
Speaker 1: got disbarred. Now there is also one last story here
28:33
Speaker 1: which makes me laugh and that is the White House. Now,
28:37
Speaker 1: the White House was asked, hey, Hunter Biden now is
28:41
Speaker 1: in serious trouble. Would you guys pardon Hunter Biden? And
28:46
Speaker 1: they're gonna lie to you. Listen, you went.
28:47
Speaker 2: To the first question of the briefing.
28:49
Speaker 4: I know you said not a lot of changed this yesterday,
28:51
Speaker 4: and it's a personal matter. But from a presidential perspective,
28:54
Speaker 4: is there any possibility that the president would end up
28:57
Speaker 4: pardoning his side?
29:00
Speaker 2: I just said no, I just answer it ahead. By
29:04
Speaker 2: the way, that's a lie.
29:06
Speaker 1: If Joe Biden gets reelected and his son gets gets
29:08
Speaker 1: indicted for a ton of crimes and charge a bunch
29:11
Speaker 1: of crimes, I promise you he is going to pardon
29:14
Speaker 1: his son, and there's no way to hold him accountable
29:17
Speaker 1: for doing that because he's already won reelection and he's
29:21
Speaker 1: not going to be up for another reelection. Of course
29:24
Speaker 1: he's going to pardon his son. And by the way,
29:26
Speaker 1: if his son has done nothing wrong as he describes it, right,
29:30
Speaker 1: and they've never done anything illegal, why would you even
29:33
Speaker 1: have to say no, I'm not going to pardon him,
29:36
Speaker 1: because you would stick to that argument.
29:38
Speaker 2: Remember, the White House's narrative has changed.
29:40
Speaker 1: It was first I never talked about any business dealings
29:42
Speaker 1: with my son.
29:44
Speaker 2: We now know that's a lie.
29:45
Speaker 1: We know they talk to business, and we know dwistel
29:47
Speaker 1: Blowers are saying they have examples of when they and
29:51
Speaker 1: they have evidence to prove that they talk to business.
29:54
Speaker 1: So now they've said they've changed the narrative. The new
29:57
Speaker 1: narrative is I Joe Biden was never ever in business
30:02
Speaker 1: with his son, By the way, that doesn't Then the
30:04
Speaker 1: next question is, Okay, was he ever in business with
30:06
Speaker 1: his brother.
30:09
Speaker 2: Either of them? Was he ever in business with his sister?
30:13
Speaker 1: Was he ever in business with any of the other
30:14
Speaker 1: people that have been taking money out of the bank
30:16
Speaker 1: accounts from CEFE and from Barisma. So if you're going
30:20
Speaker 1: to say he's not ever in business with Biden, right
30:23
Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden, then the next question, the follow up
30:26
Speaker 1: should have been, okay, well, then was he in business
30:28
Speaker 1: with any other Bidens that are involved in any of
30:30
Speaker 1: this corruption? Somebody should have asked that question at the
30:34
Speaker 1: press briefing. Of course the media didn't, but when they
30:38
Speaker 1: sit there they're like, oh, well, we're not gonna you know.
30:40
Speaker 1: Would he would absolutely not pardon Hunter Biden? Of course
30:44
Speaker 1: he would. It's his son. You think Joe Biden, if
30:47
Speaker 1: he wins re election, is going to give a crap
30:49
Speaker 1: about accountability. No, because there is no such thing for him.
30:52
Speaker 1: He's never running for another election again. You only get
30:54
Speaker 1: two terms as president. Of course, he would immediately pardon
30:58
Speaker 1: him to shut all of this down. He's also an
31:01
Speaker 1: old man. What does he have to lose now, right?
31:03
Speaker 1: He doesn't care. These are again more lies coming from
31:08
Speaker 1: this White House. Make sure you share this podcast with
31:11
Speaker 1: your family and friends. Please write us a five star
31:14
Speaker 1: review as well, and don't forget to again. Share this
31:18
Speaker 1: on social media wherever you are. We'll see you back
31:22
Speaker 1: here tomorrow