Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / We MUST Demand Obama Allow Biden's 5000+ FAKE Emails To Be Released Now!

Transcript

We MUST Demand Obama Allow Biden's 5000+ FAKE Emails To Be Released Now! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:01
  Speaker 1: I want you to imagine for a moment that Donald
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Trump or anybody is administration, any cabinet member had a
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: burner phone and a burner email account. What is a
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: burner phone a burner email. It's an email account and
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: or a phone number that you don't want anyone to
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: know that you actually have it. Imagine if you had
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: like four or five of those burner phones or burner
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: email accounts, and if Donald Trump had that, or any
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: cabinet member had it. Can you imagine the type of
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: investigation that would happen afterwards? It would be unbelievable. We
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: now know that that is exactly what happened, what was
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: going on with Joe Biden. Center Ron Johnson has now
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: come out saying Barack Obama needs to allow archives because
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: it would be his call. And now the question is
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: how much is Barack Obama involved in the cover up
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: of the Bible crime family, because Barack Obama has to
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: be the one that says yes to releasing the archives
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: on Biden's five thousand plus ALIAS emails that he was
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: using while he was the vice president. Former President Barack
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: Obama is now involved in this, whether he likes it
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: or not, because he's the one that can say yes
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: or he's the one that says no to allow the
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: National Archives to release President Joe Biden's emails and records
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: linked to his alias email address accounts. Joe Biden can't
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: even do it. It has to come from the former
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: president Barack Obama. What we do know is this Joe
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Biden used a global cell phone paid for by Hunter Biden.
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: We also know that he used three different email aliases,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: that's a total four that we know of now to
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: share government information and discuss business with Hunter Biden and associates.
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: This according to the Southeastern Legal Foundation known as s LF.
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: SLF was the first to file the Freedom of Information
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: Act requests and his afoy you to the Archives for
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: Biden's emails in twenty twenty one. Two years later, it
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: renewed the requests, but the Archives failed quote unquote to
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: produce a single one of these emails. The foundation is
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: not reported. The Archives did, however, and this is the
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: most important thing. They acknowledged the emails and records exist.
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: After the SLF filed a lawsuit to compel the agency
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: to turn over those emails. The Archives' refusal to provide
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: emails and records appears to be political driven. This according
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: to the NAR, the agency notifies the White House Counsel's
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: Office of the requests for records of the former presidents
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: that are currently unopened to the public or that are
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: proposed for public disclosure. The agency also notifies the representatives
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: of the former president and the vice president who created
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: the records. Now, Senator Johnson said that Obama should demand
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: the release of emails and records to clear any appearance
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: of wrongdoing, specifically by his administration. He said Obama should
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: allow the NARA NAR to release the five thy one
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: hundred plus email messages and more than two hundred pages
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: of records. Lawmakers began scrutinizing Joe Biden's alias email addresses
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: in twenty twenty one, but now we've found more more
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: of them and more names, more burner accounts. Senator Johnson
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: and Senator Chuck Grassley have teamed up. They are actually
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: the authors of a twenty twenty Senate report. Remember that
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: the Democrats said was basically Russian collusion, not joking. They
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: were the authors of that twenty twenty Senate report. In
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: the Biden family, they issued letters to the White House
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: and there requesting the contents of email addresses on three
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: separate occasions. This has all become public now. Quote Senator
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: Johnson said, I've been researching Joe Biden's use of private
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: email since twenty twenty one. Three letters to the Biden
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: White House have gone unanswered and NARA provided the usual
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: non response response. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, who's
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: the Republican as you know, investigating from Kentucky Joe Biden.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: The Biden crime family has officially requested the Archives hand
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: over all documents now and communications in which then Vice
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: President Joe Biden used his aliases. And we know what
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: some of these aliases were, and there's a good chance
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: there maybe others that we don't know about. The names
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: and the aliases, and I'd be interested to understand exactly
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: why these names were chosen. Were Robert Peters, Robin Ware,
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: and j rb Ware. James Comer said this the Archives
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: need to be transparent and provide these unredacted records to
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: the GOP House Oversight. The Republicans concern about the email
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: and the aliases also come as one alias, Robert Peters
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: contains an at PCI dot gov domain name now d
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: CI represents the executive office of the President and according
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: to James Rosen, is connected to a Department of Defense network.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: The Robert L. Peters alias received an email about Ukraine.
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: We now can confirm in twenty sixteen that c Seed
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. That's when Biden was making millions as the
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: big guy, and so was Hunter. More than ten million
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: in payoffs from Barisma that went down, and we know
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: that email was that Robert L. Peters. This is again
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: a Burner email account of the vice president at the time.
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: The now president received an email about Ukraine in sixteen,
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: and then he seesed Hunter Biden for a guy that
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: promised he never talked about business with his son. It
• 6:50
  Speaker 1: does seem like he's lying when he's got a Burner
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: email account and he's emailing information directly to Hunter Biden
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: about Ukraine. Now, this email, which Comer says the committee
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: has seen, includes an attachment with the Vice president's schedule
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: indicating that he had spoken by phone to then Ukrainian
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: President Porshenko. All right, let me tell you real quick
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: about an amazing company called Patriot Mobile. For ten years,
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: they have been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. And
• 7:22
  Speaker 1: when I say only trust me, they're the only one.
• 7:25
  Speaker 1: Glenn and the team have been great supporters of this show,
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: which is why I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile.
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: They offer you dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: to access all three major networks, which means you get
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding the
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: leftist agenda. When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: the message that you support free speech, religious freedom, the
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: sancty of life, Second Amendment, and our military, our veterans
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: and first responder heroes. They have one hundred percent US
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: based customer service team making switching easy. You get to
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: keep your same cell phone number, keep your same phone
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: that you have right now, keep your same phone, or
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: upgrade to a new one, and their team will help
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: you find the best plan for your needs and save
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: you real money. You've got a small business, they can
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: cover all that as well. All you need to do
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: is go to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson, Patriotmobile
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: dot com slash ferguson, or call them eight seven eight Patriot.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: That's eight seven eight Patriot get free activation when you
• 8:26
  Speaker 1: use the promo code Ferguson, join me and make the
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: switch today and protect our values and stand for them
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: with every phone call Patriotmobile dot com slash Ferguson or
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: eight seven eight Patriot I want you to hear. Also,
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: James Comer had to say on Fox Business about all
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: of this.
• 8:44
  Speaker 2: Listen, chatman of the House Obson Committee is James Coma
• 8:47
  Speaker 2: and he joins me. Now, colks soon Why would Biden
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: use pseudonyms any idea?
• 8:53
  Speaker 3: That's a great question.
• 8:54
  Speaker 4: Why would he set up with his family twenty shell companies.
• 8:58
  Speaker 4: Why would they be receiving payments from foreign nationals from Romania, China,
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: Ukraine and Russia. You know, these are questions that every
• 9:06
  Speaker 4: American should have, and that's what our investigation of Joe
• 9:09
  Speaker 4: Biden's all about.
• 9:10
  Speaker 2: Have you got access to the unredacted documents from the
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: National Archives showing these pseudonyms.
• 9:18
  Speaker 4: We have requested the unredacted documents and it's very important
• 9:22
  Speaker 4: because we believe there may be some redactions as to
• 9:25
  Speaker 4: who was copied on those emails where Joe Biden was
• 9:28
  Speaker 4: using a pseudonym, particularly in the case of Ukrainian policy Stuart.
• 9:33
  Speaker 4: So this is the utmost importance to our national security.
• 9:36
  Speaker 4: Not only was Joe Biden using pseudonyms, he was copying
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: his son on some of those emails that pertained to Ukraine.
• 9:43
  Speaker 4: When we had, prior to the pseudonyms becoming public, a
• 9:48
  Speaker 4: transcribed interview with Devin Archer, who was on the board
• 9:51
  Speaker 4: of Barisma, the corrupt Ukrainian energy company, along with the
• 9:55
  Speaker 4: President's son. He testified that the owners of Boriskazma we're
• 10:01
  Speaker 4: squeezing Hunter Biden to call Washington to get help to
• 10:05
  Speaker 4: fire the prosecutor Choken, who was investigating Barisma for corruption.
• 10:10
  Speaker 4: So along this same time period we found a pseudonym
• 10:14
  Speaker 4: where he copied Hunter Biden, and it would lead one
• 10:18
  Speaker 4: to believe that this was Joe Biden's way of copying
• 10:22
  Speaker 4: Hunter Biden to say, okay, send it to the Barisma
• 10:24
  Speaker 4: owners and tell him.
• 10:25
  Speaker 3: Help is on the way.
• 10:26
  Speaker 4: And five days later, Joe Biden flew to Ukraine to
• 10:30
  Speaker 4: begin the process of firing the prosecutor in exchange for
• 10:34
  Speaker 4: American tax dollars in the former Foreign eight.
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: You have a wealth of information right there, but look,
• 10:40
  Speaker 2: it seems likely, certainly seems possible that there will be
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: a government shutdown. Would that interfere with your investigations?
• 10:50
  Speaker 4: Well, I don't think there'll be a government shutdown. Obviously,
• 10:53
  Speaker 4: we're having lots of internal discussions now with respect to
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: how to fund the budget over the next twelve months.
• 10:59
  Speaker 4: I hope that we can agree on some cuts. I
• 11:01
  Speaker 4: hope that we can agree on holding certain bad actors
• 11:05
  Speaker 4: within our federal government accountable. But at the end of
• 11:08
  Speaker 4: the day, that's a decision that it looks like the
• 11:10
  Speaker 4: Republicans are gonna have to make as a whole because
• 11:12
  Speaker 4: we're not getting any help from the Democrats. They want
• 11:14
  Speaker 4: to continue to spend in oblivion. So but I'm optimistic
• 11:19
  Speaker 4: there won't be a shutdown. But any type of shutdown
• 11:21
  Speaker 4: would Stewart interfere with our investigation. Any excuse the Biden
• 11:26
  Speaker 4: administration can give not to be transparent with the House
• 11:29
  Speaker 4: Oversight Committee, they're going to take that.
• 11:31
  Speaker 2: Coln Saint James Comma, thank you very much for being
• 11:33
  Speaker 2: with us today.
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: If you hear James Comer, I got to I got
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: to give a lot of credit to James, because what
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: James Comer is clearly decided to do is be methodical
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: about this investigation, be very focused about this investigation, take
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: time to explain it the way that he just did,
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: and this is what what we need to explain this
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: to the country because this can sound like a complicated issue.
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: It can. It doesn't have to, It doesn't have to
• 12:10
  Speaker 1: be a complicated issue, but it can sound like a
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: complicated issue. And what he's done is simplified it to
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: explain it to you. Now, there's also something else that's happened.
• 12:25
  Speaker 1: Top GOP lawmakers now are demanding all info link to
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: David Weiss's Special Council appointment, and this is significant. Top
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: Republican committee chairs this week demanded every document and every
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: communication from the Department of Justice referring or relating to
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointment of the prosecutor now quote
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: special prosecutor who gave him the sweetheart deal David Weiss
• 12:55
  Speaker 1: to that special council the Hunter Biden case. Remember, David
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: Weiss is the one that wrote the sweetheart deal, that
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: gave the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. So the guy
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: who gave him the deal that the judge said was
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: ridiculous and said no to is the same guy that
• 13:08
  Speaker 1: now is a special counsel to somehow then do something different.
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: We all know that's not gonna happen. We also know
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: the law says that Garland is supposed to a point
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: someone from outside of the DOJ. He didn't do that.
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: We also know that the special council is supposed to
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: be someone who's unbiased from outside of the DOJ. We
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: know that David Weiss is clearly biased and within the
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: DJ and a special counsel is worthless if it doesn't
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: have those characteristics. We also know it's technically illegal, but
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: guess what. The person who you appeal to when the
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: special counsel is illegal is the Attorney General, Merrit Garland
• 13:47
  Speaker 1: And then Merrick Garland is the guy who just gave
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: this intel and gave all of the records and gave
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: everything to protect the Bidens to David Weiss, and that's
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: exactly why he appointed David Weis's special counsel. Now. Garland
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: appointed Weiss earlier this month, only after Hunter Biden's sweetheart
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: plea deal fell apart that Weiss put together. Weiss investigated
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden in theory, was investigating him for more than
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: five years. In reality, what he was doing is protecting
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. David Weiss made sure that the
• 14:24
  Speaker 1: biggest crimes committed by Hunter Biden he could no longer
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: prosecute him for and the reason why was simple because
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: the statue of limitations ran out on the biggest felonies
• 14:36
  Speaker 1: against hunter Biden hunter Biden. Weiss investigated hunter Biden for
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: five years before working out the plea deal with the
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: present son. Reports indicate the plea deal was only pushed
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: through due to IRS whistleblowers allegations, and that's what made
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: it fall apart. It's not clear why you have only now,
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: after the investigation has been going on for five years,
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: opted to appoint mister Weiss's special counsel, especially after you
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: in the Department represented that mister Weiss already had quote
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: ultimate authority over the case. That's what House Judiciary Chairman
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: Jim Jordan wrote in a letter this week, also signed
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: by the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: and the House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer. This also
• 15:24
  Speaker 1: Jim Jordan, they work really well together, as you can
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: clearly see. The lawmakers noted that alleged special treatment that
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden received, specifically from the Department of Justice, including
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: the agency actually tipping off hunter Biden's council, allowing the
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: statue of limitations to lapse on tax charges, and suggestions
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: to remove hunter Biden's name from documents such as subpoenas,
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: and prohibiting IRS and FBI investigators from asking about or
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: referring to the big guy quote unquote or Dad and
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: witness interviews. I think it's pretty clear we know what
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: was going on here. Since the early days of its
• 16:06
  Speaker 1: investigation concerning Hunter Biden, the DOJ has deviated from its
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: standard investigative procedure and afforded hunter Biden's special privileges not
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: afforded to other Americans. The letter reads. For instance, according
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: to whistleblowers, the Department of Justice tipped off the subject
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: of the investigation, Hunter Biden and hunter Biden's counsel that
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: investigators would search a storage unit hunter Biden owned before
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: investigators could conduct the search. In another instance, the Department
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: also allowed the statue of limitations to lapse on charges
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: for the twenty fourteen twenty fifteen tax years, including felony
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: charges of tax evasion and filing a false or fraudulent
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: tax return for the twenty fourteen tax year, despite the
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: Zen counsel's willingness to consent to an extension. So even
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's own team was saying, no, no, no, will it
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: will We will agree to while you guys are investigating,
• 17:10
  Speaker 1: so you don't hurry up in charge us with something
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: while you're doing your investigation. We will consent to an
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: extension of those statue limitations. And you know what happened,
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: David Weiss and the DOJ said no, no, no, we don't
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: want to get we don't need an extension. We'll just
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: let it run out. If you're investigating tax crimes and
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: you know that tax crimes exist, and you're and you're
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: going through all of this, and the Defense Council, Hunter
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: Biden's counsel is willing to consent to an extension of
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: those statue limitations, why would you not take it unless
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: you're actually covering for the president's son and protecting the
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: Biden crime family.
• 17:49
  Speaker 3: Quote.
• 17:50
  Speaker 1: These deviations took place while mister Weiss, with a full
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: support and backing of the Department of Justice, oversaw the
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: Hunter Byden investigations the US Attorney prior to receiving Special
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: Council status. So what they're saying is is he had
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: full of authority autonomy to do whatever he wanted to do,
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: and The question they're asking is, Okay, if he had
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: full authority to do whatever it is that he wanted
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: to do, now, what would be any different that he
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: has been named special counsel. He could have done everything
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: he now has the ability to do. Then, based on
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: what we've been told, now, the Department of Justice has
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: until September the eleventh to respond to this letter that
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: has come from Jim Jordan, James Comer, etc. The agency,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: by the way, confirm receive the letter, but declined to comment.
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: The Hill newspaper is now reporting, so this is becoming
• 18:36
  Speaker 1: a bigger problem for them. Now now they can just
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: say here's the middle finger in Pound Sand in Washington,
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: d C. They can do that. There's a very good
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: chance that they might do that. That wouldn't actually surprise
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: me at all if they did that. But these five
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: thousand plus emails using Biden's you know, burner accounts are
• 18:55
  Speaker 1: in possession of the National Archives. The question is why
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: do they have them right? What's because he was using
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: email addresses that were important within the government that we
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: didn't know about. That is not normal. Here's a little
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: bit more of what James Comer had to say in
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: another interview National Report on Newsmax about what they're finding.
• 19:16
  Speaker 5: I just want to get your reaction there to Kilmeny's
• 19:19
  Speaker 5: report the National Archives admitting it has thousands of emails
• 19:24
  Speaker 5: and electronic records related to pseudonyms allegedly used by then
• 19:28
  Speaker 5: Vice President Joe Biden. Where are you in the process
• 19:31
  Speaker 5: of coming through those emails and is there more to this?
• 19:35
  Speaker 4: Well, we have copies of several of those emails, certainly
• 19:39
  Speaker 4: not five thousand, four hundred like what is estimated that
• 19:42
  Speaker 4: he used. But many of these emails that we have
• 19:46
  Speaker 4: copies to are redacted, and we want the unredacted version
• 19:51
  Speaker 4: because we already know of at least one email pertaining
• 19:55
  Speaker 4: the Ukrainian policy at a time that fits when Devin
• 19:58
  Speaker 4: Archer's testimony, Wood said that the owners of Barisma were
• 20:03
  Speaker 4: squeezing Hunter to call Washington for help in getting Choken
• 20:08
  Speaker 4: the Ukrainian prosecutor fired, who was investigating the president's son's
• 20:13
  Speaker 4: corrupt energy company in Ukraine. And we all know that
• 20:16
  Speaker 4: days later Joe Biden went to Ukraine and withheld foreign
• 20:20
  Speaker 4: tax dollars in the form of four and aid in
• 20:23
  Speaker 4: exchange for terminating Victor Schokin, the prosecutor who is investigating
• 20:28
  Speaker 4: his son. So we're very concerned now that Joe Biden
• 20:32
  Speaker 4: was using pseudonyms to hide the fact that he was
• 20:36
  Speaker 4: working with his son to pedal access to our enemies
• 20:41
  Speaker 4: around the world in exchange for wire transfers that we've
• 20:45
  Speaker 4: already discovered that went to shell companies or fake companies
• 20:50
  Speaker 4: while he was vice president. So let's just think about this,
• 20:53
  Speaker 4: the vice president at the time, Joe Biden was using
• 20:56
  Speaker 4: fake names in emails, and he also was working with
• 21:02
  Speaker 4: his family that set up fake companies to receive wires
• 21:06
  Speaker 4: from foreign nationals that were then laundered into at least
• 21:09
  Speaker 4: nine family members bank accounts. I mean, this is one
• 21:12
  Speaker 4: of the worst stories that I've ever heard with respect
• 21:15
  Speaker 4: to any type of leader in the history of our country.
• 21:20
  Speaker 6: It would obviously, you know, lead you, I'm sure to
• 21:22
  Speaker 6: question where the money is and where did it ultimately
• 21:26
  Speaker 6: end up. Could you share an update on sort of
• 21:28
  Speaker 6: the process of tracking down alleged payments to folks with
• 21:33
  Speaker 6: the last name Biden.
• 21:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean that we've got twenty one million dollars
• 21:38
  Speaker 4: thus far in bank accounts that were the part of
• 21:43
  Speaker 4: wire transfers from foreign nationals to shell companies, and again
• 21:47
  Speaker 4: I can't reemphasize this enough. Shell companies are fake companies,
• 21:51
  Speaker 4: just like a pseudonym. A pseudonym is a fake name.
• 21:53
  Speaker 4: The same thing with these companies that were receiving the
• 21:56
  Speaker 4: initial wires from these foreign nationals. And again, these were
• 21:58
  Speaker 4: bad people in bad countries that we're paying the bidens
• 22:02
  Speaker 4: tens of millions of dollars for reasons.
• 22:04
  Speaker 3: We don't know. All we know is, according to.
• 22:06
  Speaker 4: Devin Archer, they were selling the brand, and the brand
• 22:08
  Speaker 4: was Joe Biden. We know that one of the instances
• 22:11
  Speaker 4: of a potential policy decision that was made was Joe
• 22:15
  Speaker 4: Biden has already admitted that he flew to Ukrainian with
• 22:17
  Speaker 4: held tax dollars to fire a prosecutor who was investigating
• 22:21
  Speaker 4: his son's corrupt energy company. I mean, this is really
• 22:24
  Speaker 4: bad stuff. And every week we find more information, more pseudonyms,
• 22:29
  Speaker 4: more communication between Joe Biden's family, more show companies, more
• 22:33
  Speaker 4: wire transferst So this is getting worse by the day.
• 22:37
  Speaker 4: And what we want to know, we want to know
• 22:39
  Speaker 4: a couple of more bank accounts that we believe that
• 22:43
  Speaker 4: the president's son was using to pay for things of
• 22:46
  Speaker 4: value for Joe Biden. So this is where we are
• 22:49
  Speaker 4: in this investigation. We're at the point to where we're
• 22:52
  Speaker 4: probably going to head the court to try to get some.
• 22:54
  Speaker 3: More bank records.
• 22:56
  Speaker 4: But this is an investigation of Joe Biden. And I
• 22:58
  Speaker 4: don't think the Democrats, you know, they ended Joe Biden
• 23:02
  Speaker 4: for nearly a year. Now, can they defend the pseudonyms?
• 23:05
  Speaker 4: Can they defend the payments going to things of value.
• 23:10
  Speaker 3: For Joe Biden.
• 23:11
  Speaker 4: That's where the Democrats are going to have to have
• 23:13
  Speaker 4: a come to Jesus moment and decide how much longer
• 23:16
  Speaker 4: they could defend the indefensible with respect to Joe Biden.
• 23:19
  Speaker 5: With respect of the emails, I know that you said
• 23:21
  Speaker 5: that you had copies on and some of them were redacted.
• 23:23
  Speaker 5: We actually have one I believe that is not redacted
• 23:26
  Speaker 5: that we've got our hands on.
• 23:27
  Speaker 6: Here.
• 23:28
  Speaker 5: And this is just kind of a zoom in here,
• 23:30
  Speaker 5: And this is from one of the alleged pseudonyms, Robert L.
• 23:33
  Speaker 5: Peters CC Hunter Biden on that and it says Boss
• 23:36
  Speaker 5: eight forty five am prep for nine am phone call
• 23:38
  Speaker 5: with the President Porshenko. This is just one where does
• 23:43
  Speaker 5: your mind go when you see that?
• 23:45
  Speaker 3: Well?
• 23:45
  Speaker 4: I see that that connects Hunter Biden to Joe Biden
• 23:48
  Speaker 4: at the time when Devin Archer said he was being
• 23:50
  Speaker 4: squeezed by Barisma by the owners to call Washington for help. Now,
• 23:54
  Speaker 4: remember we already found an FBI ten twenty three form
• 23:57
  Speaker 4: that alleged Joe Biden and Hunter Biden both took from
• 24:00
  Speaker 4: this guy who was squeezing Hunter Biden to call Washington,
• 24:03
  Speaker 4: DC for help.
• 24:04
  Speaker 3: Then Joe Biden, using a pseudonym, copies his.
• 24:07
  Speaker 4: Son right before he leaves to go to Ukraine at
• 24:12
  Speaker 4: the same time he was being pressured to call Washington
• 24:15
  Speaker 4: for help. It looks to me like Joe Biden was saying, Okay, son,
• 24:19
  Speaker 4: you send that to the owner of Brisma and tell
• 24:21
  Speaker 4: him help is on the way.
• 24:22
  Speaker 3: Tell him Daddy's coming. Daddy's coming, and he's gonna save
• 24:25
  Speaker 3: us all.
• 24:26
  Speaker 4: And that's what it looks like has happened, and they
• 24:28
  Speaker 4: used a pseudonym to disguise it. That's why I tell
• 24:31
  Speaker 4: people when they say, why is it taking so long
• 24:33
  Speaker 4: in this investigation, the pseudonyms are just an example. They
• 24:36
  Speaker 4: have done everything in their ability to block and obstruct
• 24:39
  Speaker 4: this investigation. Joe Biden wants to say he's the most
• 24:41
  Speaker 4: transparent president of the United States that's bullcrap. He's the
• 24:45
  Speaker 4: least transparent president in the United States. If he were innocent,
• 24:48
  Speaker 4: he would be cooperating with this committee and trying to save.
• 24:52
  Speaker 3: His good name.
• 24:54
  Speaker 4: But he continues to act like there's nothing to see
• 24:56
  Speaker 4: here when that email on the screen, he's a government email.
• 25:00
  Speaker 4: Joe Biden was using a suit and he copied his
• 25:02
  Speaker 4: son about a shady, shady transaction where Joe Biden was
• 25:07
  Speaker 4: going to leverage American tax dollars to save his son's button,
• 25:11
  Speaker 4: probably his own bud If that FBI Forum's right that
• 25:14
  Speaker 4: he took a bribe.
• 25:15
  Speaker 3: So I think this is very concerning.
• 25:17
  Speaker 6: Could you talk to us about the timing of this
• 25:19
  Speaker 6: all again, the allegations that this might have taken place
• 25:21
  Speaker 6: before President Biden was in the oval office. Does that
• 25:25
  Speaker 6: impact what the House of Representatives might be able to
• 25:28
  Speaker 6: do when it comes to inquiries, even opening one up
• 25:31
  Speaker 6: about potential impeachment as I know some of your GP
• 25:33
  Speaker 6: colleagues have called for.
• 25:36
  Speaker 4: It happened while he was the vice president of the
• 25:37
  Speaker 4: United States. And what we're concerned is, we have no
• 25:41
  Speaker 4: doubt the president the vice president is probably the most
• 25:44
  Speaker 4: vice president in the history of America You've already seen
• 25:47
  Speaker 4: too many things where his family was creating these fake companies.
• 25:50
  Speaker 3: They were getting all these wires from foreign as well.
• 25:52
  Speaker 4: They can't explain what they were doing to get this money.
• 25:55
  Speaker 4: Does that compromise him as being president the United States?
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: Is that why he soft on child?
• 26:00
  Speaker 4: Is that why Joe Biden continues to put China first
• 26:02
  Speaker 4: in the America last? Because his family received millions and
• 26:04
  Speaker 4: millions of dollars from China. Is that why we're giving
• 26:07
  Speaker 4: Ukraine a blank check for their war against Russia?
• 26:11
  Speaker 3: Is that because he accepted the bribe? Like to help
• 26:15
  Speaker 3: you out, Ford say, Is it because.
• 26:16
  Speaker 4: He was sharing government information with his son and he
• 26:19
  Speaker 4: leveraged tax dollars to fire that prosecutor.
• 26:21
  Speaker 3: Chokin who was investigating his son.
• 26:23
  Speaker 4: These are legitimate questions and there is more than enough
• 26:26
  Speaker 4: evidence that would suggest the House of Representatives needs to
• 26:31
  Speaker 4: take this at least to the point of impeachment inquiry.
• 26:34
  Speaker 5: Yeah again, Kevin McCarthy saying that the only thing here
• 26:37
  Speaker 5: is this would an impeachment inquiry would be a natural
• 26:40
  Speaker 5: step forward. I wanted to move on to this before
• 26:43
  Speaker 5: we let you go natural.
• 26:45
  Speaker 1: I mean, you listen to that last statement. There it
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: would be a natural step forward, of course it would.
• 26:53
  Speaker 1: I think the easiest part for the Democrats on this
• 26:57
  Speaker 1: really is this. They know he did it, They've accepted it.
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: They know that Joe Biden's compromised, They've accepted it. They
• 27:08
  Speaker 1: know there's massive corruption, they've accepted it. They know that
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: he is a president that is incapacitated, which means, in
• 27:17
  Speaker 1: a weird way, those in the House and the Senate
• 27:20
  Speaker 1: that are Democrats actually have more power to get stuff done.
• 27:26
  Speaker 1: That's the trade off here. The incompetency is the trade off, right,
• 27:31
  Speaker 1: The incompetency is actually to their advantage. Without that incompetency
• 27:39
  Speaker 1: that we just mentioned here, then you're screwed, right. They
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: need the payoff to keep supporting him, and the payoff
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: is they can run this government because you have a
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: president that's not That's why they've clearly been willing to
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: accept everything else. This is why it's not just impeachment.
• 28:01
  Speaker 1: This is why Republicans better get their act together and
• 28:06
  Speaker 1: go all in to make sure we actually get to
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: the bottom of all of this. Make sure, by the
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: way that you share this podcast with your family and friends,
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: hit that little forward arrow and text it or put
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: it on social media. Also hit that auto download or
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: subscribe button, so you get this podcast each and every
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: day for free, and I'll see you back here tomorrow