Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Hunter Claimed He Didn’t Receive "One Cent" from China Associate Despite Wire Transfer!

Transcript

Hunter Claimed He Didn’t Receive "One Cent" from China Associate Despite Wire Transfer! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: All right, so the government is open, and that's great,
0:03
Speaker 1: fighting dandy. We're gonna deal with that coming up. But
0:06
Speaker 1: before we get to that, we have a big lie
0:10
Speaker 1: that is unraveling that involves Hunter Biden and the President
0:13
Speaker 1: and their claims that they didn't receive one cent from
0:17
Speaker 1: Chinese associate, despite now wired transfers that proved that they
0:22
Speaker 1: were lying to all of us.
0:24
Speaker 2: Now this all goes back to Hunter Biden.
0:27
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was the first person to deny receiving quote
0:31
Speaker 1: unquote one cent from his family's deal with BEHR Partner
0:36
Speaker 1: associate Jonathan Lee. A video from October of nineteen, twenty
0:41
Speaker 1: nineteen confirms, well, guess what in the summer of twenty nineteen,
0:46
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden did receive more than one cent. A hell
0:49
Speaker 1: of a lot more. In fact, if you want to
0:52
Speaker 1: do the math, you can figure out how many cents
0:54
Speaker 1: are in two wired transfers totaling two hundred and sixty
0:58
Speaker 1: thousand dollars. Guess where it came from? Jonathan Lee from
1:03
Speaker 1: BHR Partner Associates. This includes Lee that listed that these
1:08
Speaker 1: wire transfer listed President Joe Biden's Delaware home as the
1:13
Speaker 1: beneficiary address for the funds to be transferred. The House
1:19
Speaker 1: Oversight Committee revealed all of this this week while everybody
1:22
Speaker 1: was talking about government shutdowns. Look over here right at
1:25
Speaker 1: the government shutdown, and then we'll release some intel that
1:29
Speaker 1: no one will have to cover. Guess what's even more
1:32
Speaker 1: shocking than that the funds were bankrolled by none other
1:36
Speaker 1: than the actual Bank of China.
1:39
Speaker 2: That's right.
1:40
Speaker 1: Months after receiving the bank wires in twenty nineteen, Hunter
1:46
Speaker 1: Biden told ABC News in that sit down interview that
1:51
Speaker 1: he did not receive one penny from Lee. That was
1:56
Speaker 1: a lie. And we know it was a lie because
2:00
Speaker 1: we had the video from the ABC News one on
2:02
Speaker 1: one exclusive with Hunter Biden listen.
2:05
Speaker 3: Air Force two with his father during an official government
2:08
Speaker 3: trip to China in twenty thirteen, leveraging that connection for
2:12
Speaker 3: financial gain in an investment deal with Chinese businessman Jonathan Lee.
2:17
Speaker 4: The president has repeatedly said that you received one point
2:20
Speaker 4: five billion dollars from China, despite no experience and for
2:24
Speaker 4: no apparent reason. Obviously, fact checkers have said that that is.
2:29
Speaker 1: Not Look this literally has no basis in fact in
2:32
Speaker 1: any way.
2:33
Speaker 4: Have you received any money from my business dealing at all?
2:36
Speaker 5: Not one cent, not one cent.
2:38
Speaker 1: Not one cent. Let's go with the facts again. In
2:43
Speaker 1: October of twenty nineteen, Hunter Biden said he hadn't made
2:46
Speaker 1: one cent from his business deals with Chinese national Jonathan Lee.
2:51
Speaker 1: You fast forward in time, or I technically go backwards
2:55
Speaker 1: into August of twenty nineteen. Right, this interview was in
2:58
Speaker 1: October the same year, so just two and a half
3:01
Speaker 1: months earlier. Lee wired two hundred and fifty thousand Hunter
3:05
Speaker 1: Biden with Joe Biden's Delaware home listed as the beneficiary address. Now,
3:10
Speaker 1: if hunter Biden didn't make a cent, as he was
3:14
Speaker 1: claiming off this deal with Lee, then the big question
3:17
Speaker 1: now is who did think about that. Let's say that
3:21
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is telling the truth. Let's say hypothetically that
3:25
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden is telling you the god honest truth. Hey,
3:29
Speaker 1: I didn't make a cent from Lee. That also could
3:32
Speaker 1: be very accurate. Why because the money wasn't going to
3:36
Speaker 1: hunter Biden's address. We also know where Hunter Biden was
3:40
Speaker 1: living during that time that the money was transferred back
3:43
Speaker 1: in twenty nineteen, in his own memoir, he says he
3:48
Speaker 1: was living in California. Well, we also know from the
3:53
Speaker 1: Sweetheart plea deal that was given to him that blew
3:57
Speaker 1: up in court just a month and a half ago
4:00
Speaker 1: that in the court documents during that time, it states
4:05
Speaker 1: in that plea deal that Hunter Biden was living in California.
4:10
Speaker 1: We have two confirmations now that Hunter Biden was in
4:14
Speaker 1: California at the time that the two hundred and fifty
4:17
Speaker 1: thousand dollars was wired to the home of the Big Guy,
4:22
Speaker 1: and we now have the president's son who is contradicting
4:27
Speaker 1: the White House. The White House has said that the
4:30
Speaker 1: President never received a dime from any of these business deals.
4:33
Speaker 2: Yet his home.
4:34
Speaker 1: Address, where Hunter Biden was not living at the time,
4:38
Speaker 1: was the address used to wire transfer a quarter of
4:42
Speaker 1: a million dollars from the Bank of China.
4:45
Speaker 2: So there are two different scenarios here.
4:48
Speaker 1: One, clearly Lee and others in China were buying access
4:53
Speaker 1: to the US government through the vice president who was
4:55
Speaker 1: then running for president, Joe Biden. That's option one. K
5:00
Speaker 1: Two is Hunter Biden is telling you the truth. He
5:03
Speaker 1: didn't receive a single dime from Jonathan Lee because it
5:05
Speaker 1: all went to the big Guy. Let me say that again,
5:09
Speaker 1: it all went to the big Guy. The question is
5:15
Speaker 1: very simple, have you received any money from that business
5:18
Speaker 1: dealing that's what the ABC News reporter asked Hunter Biden.
5:21
Speaker 1: His reply, no, no, not one cent, she quested, not
5:26
Speaker 1: one cent. Hunter Biden then claimed. Now the time frame
5:30
Speaker 1: detailed and Hunter Biden's collapsed plea deal in July with
5:34
Speaker 1: the now Special Council, David White says Hunter Biden's residence
5:38
Speaker 1: was in California when the Chinese partner sent money to
5:42
Speaker 1: an account linked to Joe Biden's home address. The Big
5:45
Speaker 1: Guy Hunter Biden quote remained in California and spent much
5:49
Speaker 1: of the summer of twenty nineteen painting and developing plans
5:53
Speaker 1: for his memoir.
5:54
Speaker 2: The plea Deal states on page.
5:56
Speaker 1: Nine, and Hunter Biden's memoir Beautiful Things the Sun also
6:01
Speaker 1: noted that he lived in California at the time his
6:06
Speaker 1: Chinese partners wired the money to Delaware. We also now
6:10
Speaker 1: have the White House spokeswoman dodging questions about Chinese payments
6:16
Speaker 1: to the Biden family.
6:19
Speaker 6: House over Site says they've got bank records showing a
6:22
Speaker 6: Chinese energy company paying three Biden family members through a
6:26
Speaker 6: third party.
6:27
Speaker 5: What were they paid for?
6:29
Speaker 7: Look, I'm just not going to respond to that from here. Look,
6:33
Speaker 7: we have heard from House Republicans for years in years
6:37
Speaker 7: and years, how the inaccuracies and lies when it comes
6:42
Speaker 7: to this issue. And I don't even wear to begin
6:46
Speaker 7: to even answer that question, because again, it's been lies
6:49
Speaker 7: and lies and inaccuracy for the past couple of years,
6:52
Speaker 7: and I'm just not going to get into it from here.
6:54
Speaker 1: I'm not going to get into it from here. So,
6:57
Speaker 1: in other words, you don't have an answer to that question.
7:00
Speaker 1: That is your White House spresser, Terry right, I don't
7:02
Speaker 1: have an answer for that question.
7:06
Speaker 2: I just don't.
7:08
Speaker 1: The money, by the way, wired from Beijing, China. It
7:11
Speaker 1: directly contradicts Joe Biden's false claim, his lie that Hunter
7:15
Speaker 1: Biden never made money from China. Or it proves that
7:19
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden was telling the truth and Joe Biden is
7:21
Speaker 1: the big guy. Joe Biden was making all the money
7:24
Speaker 1: on these types of deals since his son wasn't living
7:27
Speaker 1: at that address during the time.
7:29
Speaker 2: You get to pick who you believe.
7:30
Speaker 1: Now, either Joe Biden is not the big guy but
7:34
Speaker 1: somehow randomly gets money sent to his house from Chinese
7:37
Speaker 1: Communist Party officials, or Hunter Biden took all the money
7:41
Speaker 1: and uses dad's address to get all the money and
7:43
Speaker 1: then paid for his dad's things, or Hunter Biden is
7:46
Speaker 1: a crackhead that always tells the truth and is telling
7:49
Speaker 1: the truth in that ABC interview when he said he
7:53
Speaker 1: never made a single cent from China, never made a
7:56
Speaker 1: single cent from Lee. If you believe that, that means
7:58
Speaker 1: the big guy wasn't getting ted percent. That means the
8:01
Speaker 1: big guy was getting one hundred percent of the payments
8:06
Speaker 1: coming into the Biden crime family. That is the headline
8:10
Speaker 1: that everybody here should be talking about. And we also
8:14
Speaker 1: know by the way that BHR Partners, the fund that
8:18
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden co founded with a joint venture with Devon
8:22
Speaker 1: Archer and Lee, maintains investments worth billions.
8:27
Speaker 2: Of dollars in China.
8:29
Speaker 1: We also know that Kevin Morris, Hunter Biden's lawyer and confidant,
8:34
Speaker 1: controls Hunter Biden's.
8:36
Speaker 2: Steak in the entity.
8:37
Speaker 1: And we know that Devin Archer's wife also controls his
8:42
Speaker 1: stake in BHR Partners. Now there also is a third
8:46
Speaker 1: scenario here. Everybody's lying about everything. In August of twenty nineteen,
8:51
Speaker 1: when Lee wired the two hundred fty thousand dollars one
8:53
Speaker 1: Hunter and Joe Biden and Joe Biden's Delaware address and
8:57
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden wasn't living there, and Hunter Biden was in
8:59
Speaker 1: California the time. There is a chance then maybe that
9:03
Speaker 1: payment's just hey, Dad.
9:04
Speaker 2: You take it all right. I'm out here in California.
9:06
Speaker 1: I've got plenty of hookers and blow and instead of
9:10
Speaker 1: you know, me worrying about it, I'm just going to
9:11
Speaker 1: send you the two fifty.
9:13
Speaker 3: That hunterd flu on Air Force two with his father
9:15
Speaker 3: during an official government trip to China in twenty thirteen,
9:19
Speaker 3: leveraging that connection for financial gain in an investment deal
9:23
Speaker 3: with Chinese businessman Jonathan Lee.
9:26
Speaker 4: The president has repeatedly said that you received one point
9:29
Speaker 4: five billion dollars from China, despite no experience and for
9:33
Speaker 4: no apparent reason. Obviously, fact checkers have said that that is.
9:37
Speaker 1: Not Look, this literally has no basis in fact in
9:41
Speaker 1: any way.
9:41
Speaker 3: Have you received any money from on business dealing at all?
9:45
Speaker 5: Not one cent, not one.
9:46
Speaker 2: Cent, not one cent. There it is.
9:48
Speaker 1: So maybe he didn't receive a cent. Maybe that payment
9:51
Speaker 1: was for the dad. Maybe that all went to daddy.
9:54
Speaker 1: And remember you got yelling coming from the President of
9:57
Speaker 1: the United States of America doing his press conference, not
10:00
Speaker 1: in the West Wing, not.
10:01
Speaker 2: In the White House.
10:01
Speaker 1: He has to go over with the EEO B so
10:03
Speaker 1: he can have his big a teleprompter for his answers.
10:06
Speaker 1: He was asked about some of this. Listen to what
10:09
Speaker 1: the President said back in the day, China compromise by
10:14
Speaker 1: your family, man, give me a break man. The question
10:24
Speaker 1: that was yelled out is your ability to deal with
10:27
Speaker 1: China compromised by your family's business relationships in China. In China,
10:35
Speaker 1: give me a break man, laughing. There's your official answer
10:39
Speaker 1: from the White House. Now, while all of this has
10:43
Speaker 1: been going on, there's also another story related to this,
10:50
Speaker 1: and this is another problem for the Biden crime family
10:53
Speaker 1: as well. The other part of the story is a
10:56
Speaker 1: forensic expert. A forensic expert who has a code name
11:02
Speaker 1: for financial crimes said that code words and code names
11:07
Speaker 1: like the Big Guy are commonly used in financial crime
11:12
Speaker 1: cover ups. They say code names are used to protect
11:15
Speaker 1: people that you know from being accused of financial crimes
11:20
Speaker 1: the same way, and that we have text messages and
11:22
Speaker 1: emails saying leave Joe Biden's name out of these text
11:26
Speaker 1: messages and emails. Don't mention his name in emails or
11:29
Speaker 1: text messages, don't talk about his name on the phone. Right,
11:32
Speaker 1: we have all this from text messages and code names
11:36
Speaker 1: like President Joe Biden's infamous alias the Big Guy, are
11:39
Speaker 1: often used in financial crimes. That was the official testimony
11:44
Speaker 1: of the accountant witness, the forensic account and witness, Bruce Dobinski.
11:49
Speaker 1: Typically you'll see code names used and money is being
11:53
Speaker 1: paid to someone under that code name, he said, That's
11:56
Speaker 1: how these processes work.
12:00
Speaker 2: Vinski.
12:00
Speaker 1: The question was asked, you have extensive experience as an expert,
12:04
Speaker 1: witness and consultant in the area of white collar crime,
12:08
Speaker 1: financial fraud, and corruption. Is it characteristic of these types
12:12
Speaker 1: of crimes that actors hide behind nicknames or pseudonyms to
12:16
Speaker 1: mask their identity? Congress Men let Turner asked Dibenski's reply,
12:24
Speaker 1: it's very very common. Take a listen to.
12:28
Speaker 6: This, I would say to the American people, look at
12:31
Speaker 6: the evidence before you and make a judgment, and do
12:34
Speaker 6: not allow the White House or our colleagues on the
12:37
Speaker 6: other side of the aisle try to convince you that
12:39
Speaker 6: what you're seeing isn't the truth, trying to convince you
12:42
Speaker 6: that you're crazy. Mister Dobinski, you have extensive experience as
12:47
Speaker 6: an expert witness and consultant in the areas of white
12:50
Speaker 6: collar crime, financial fraud, and corruption. Is it characteristic of
12:54
Speaker 6: these types of crimes that actors hide behind nicknames or
12:58
Speaker 6: other pseudonyms to master their identity that you have investigated
13:01
Speaker 6: or provided expert testimony on in the past.
13:03
Speaker 5: Well, typically you'll see code names used and money is
13:07
Speaker 5: being paid to somebody under that code name, and that's
13:10
Speaker 5: how these processes work.
13:12
Speaker 6: Let me ask you something. You're very experienced when conducting
13:16
Speaker 6: an investigation. If your boss prevented you from taking investigative steps,
13:19
Speaker 6: how would you react? How would it affect your findings?
13:23
Speaker 5: First, it would be extremely troubling if I was told
13:26
Speaker 5: not to continue to investigate something, and if I was
13:29
Speaker 5: put in that position, I'd probably withdraw from the investigation.
13:32
Speaker 6: Has the Department of Justice ever restricted any of your
13:34
Speaker 6: investigative steps?
13:36
Speaker 5: No, they have not.
13:37
Speaker 6: It's amazing, mister chairman, I yield back my time.
13:41
Speaker 2: What else do you need besides that?
13:44
Speaker 1: A total of six people appeared to previously use the
13:47
Speaker 1: big guy name to reference. Okay, this is very important
13:54
Speaker 1: to reference Joe Biden. These are big players, including Gary Shapley,
14:01
Speaker 1: James Glaar, Mister Rogers, Hunter, Biden himself, and Frank Biden.
14:07
Speaker 1: This name became famous when The New York Post reported
14:13
Speaker 1: an email found on Hunter Biden's laptop ten to one
14:15
Speaker 1: of Hunter Biden's business partners, James Galar, in the weeks
14:18
Speaker 1: leading up to the twenty twenty president sho election. The
14:21
Speaker 1: email outlined the proposed percentage distribution of equity in the
14:26
Speaker 1: joint venture of CEFC China Energy Company. The proposed plan
14:31
Speaker 1: included ten percent held for H. Hell excuse me, let
14:35
Speaker 1: me make sure I says exactly right. Ten percent held
14:38
Speaker 1: by H H stood for Hunter for the big guy,
14:43
Speaker 1: the big guy. The question about the big guy also
14:46
Speaker 1: rose during an ongoing federal investigation Delaware into Hunter Biden.
14:50
Speaker 1: In fact, irs whistleblowers now alleged at the assistant US
14:54
Speaker 1: Attorney Leslie wolf refused to allow Hunter Biden investigators to
15:00
Speaker 1: ask if Joe Biden was the big Guy. In addition
15:05
Speaker 1: to that, an email released this week by the House
15:08
Speaker 1: Ways and Means Committee showed that that same Assistant US
15:12
Speaker 1: Attorney Leslie Wolfe ordered investigators in August of twenty twenty
15:18
Speaker 1: presidential election season to remove any reference to political figure
15:24
Speaker 1: one from a FAARAH search warrant. You don't know why
15:28
Speaker 1: because in August of twenty twenty. It was right after
15:30
Speaker 1: the presidential election and Joe Biden was a sitting president of.
15:32
Speaker 2: The United States of America.
15:34
Speaker 1: Then a document subsequently release showed that Joe Biden is
15:38
Speaker 1: in fact political number political figure number one. All right,
15:44
Speaker 1: let me tell you real quick about an amazing company
15:46
Speaker 1: called Patriot Mobile. For ten years, they have been America's
15:50
Speaker 1: only Christian conservative wireless provider. And when I say only
15:54
Speaker 1: trust me, they're the only one. Glenn and the team
15:57
Speaker 1: have been great supporters of this show, which is why
16:00
Speaker 1: I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile. They offer you
16:04
Speaker 1: dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability to access all
16:07
Speaker 1: three major networks, which means you get the same coverage
16:10
Speaker 1: you've been accustomed to without funding the leftist agenda. When
16:15
Speaker 1: you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending the message that
16:18
Speaker 1: you support free speech, religious freedom, sancty of life, Second Amendment,
16:22
Speaker 1: and our military, our veterans and first responder heroes. They
16:25
Speaker 1: have one hundred percent US based customer service team making
16:28
Speaker 1: switching easy. You get to keep your same cell phone number,
16:32
Speaker 1: keep your same phone that you have right now, keep
16:34
Speaker 1: your same phone, or upgrade to a new one and
16:37
Speaker 1: their team will help you find the best plan for
16:40
Speaker 1: your needs and save you real money. You've got a
16:42
Speaker 1: small business, they can cover all that as well. All
16:45
Speaker 1: you need to do is go to Patriot mobile dot
16:48
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson, patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson, or call
16:53
Speaker 1: them nine to seven to two Patriot. That's nine to
16:56
Speaker 1: seven to two Patriot get free activation when you use
16:59
Speaker 1: the promo code Ferguson. Join me and make the switch
17:03
Speaker 1: today and protect our values and stand for them with
17:06
Speaker 1: every phone call patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or nine
17:10
Speaker 1: to seven too Patriot. There is a story right now
17:17
Speaker 1: that if it was a Republican that did this, I
17:21
Speaker 1: would argue, they would have already been arrested. Okay, they
17:25
Speaker 1: would have already been kicked out of Congress, they would
17:28
Speaker 1: have been charged with major crimes, including bare minimum insurrection,
17:34
Speaker 1: and it would have been the leading story for the
17:36
Speaker 1: last twenty four to forty eight hours since this happened.
17:41
Speaker 1: I'm guessing that many of you who are listening right
17:45
Speaker 1: now are probably going to hear about this story for
17:49
Speaker 1: the very first time on the show. Not because you're
17:51
Speaker 1: not politically a student, not because you're not paying attention,
17:54
Speaker 1: but because this story is a story that's like, oh no, no,
17:57
Speaker 1: it didn't happen.
17:58
Speaker 2: Now why did it not happen? Two reasons why.
18:01
Speaker 1: One because the person that did it is an African
18:04
Speaker 1: American and two because the person that did it as
18:07
Speaker 1: a Democrat who's an African American in the Democratic Party.
18:11
Speaker 1: Now let me go back real quick, just give a
18:14
Speaker 1: very quick comparing contrast. January sixth happened. It was a
18:18
Speaker 1: day that is a bad day for this country. Was
18:21
Speaker 1: not nine to eleven. Want to make that clear. Democrats
18:23
Speaker 1: say it was. It was a nine to eleven event.
18:25
Speaker 2: It was not.
18:27
Speaker 1: There were people that made release stupid decisions on that
18:29
Speaker 1: day and they should be held accountable.
18:31
Speaker 2: I want to be clear.
18:32
Speaker 1: I do not believe that they are like al Qaeda,
18:34
Speaker 1: as Democrats have treated them, and as the court system
18:37
Speaker 1: is treat them like they are actual terrorists. Okay, if
18:40
Speaker 1: you were let into the capitol that day by police
18:42
Speaker 1: and shown your way around like some of them were
18:44
Speaker 1: clearly shown on video, do I believe that you deserve
18:47
Speaker 1: to go to jail for five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, twelve, fifteen,
18:49
Speaker 1: twenty years. No, do I believe that little grandmothers who
18:53
Speaker 1: wandered into the Capitol that day that didn't do anything,
18:55
Speaker 1: didn't destroy anything, didn't try to set anything on fire.
18:58
Speaker 1: Do I believe they should be in prison for that.
19:00
Speaker 5: No.
19:00
Speaker 1: If you walk through a door and there was a
19:02
Speaker 1: police officer there that walked you in that door or
19:04
Speaker 1: opened that door for you, and you're in the Capitol,
19:06
Speaker 1: doub believe you should be charged with crime.
19:07
Speaker 2: No, I do not.
19:09
Speaker 1: But nevertheless, anyone that was in and around January sixth,
19:12
Speaker 1: the Capitol building has been treated like a domestic terrace.
19:15
Speaker 1: It's a problem, and they've hunted them down. In fact,
19:18
Speaker 1: there was every government agency that was went into full
19:22
Speaker 1: court press and they even were requesting the financial records
19:27
Speaker 1: ATM transaction debit card transactions of hotels and others around
19:31
Speaker 1: there to even see and to get a calculation of
19:34
Speaker 1: who was in Washington, d C. On January the sixth.
19:39
Speaker 1: We went into a full on nine to eleven style
19:43
Speaker 1: mentality because.
19:45
Speaker 2: Of January sixth. That also is a.
19:48
Speaker 1: Problem, and we've hunted down people now literally for years
19:51
Speaker 1: after January sixth. We arrested people recently for things that
19:55
Speaker 1: they are accused of doing on January the sixth, just
19:59
Speaker 1: to again put it in perspective. Now, I say all
20:03
Speaker 1: that to remind you how people were treated that we're Republicans, right.
20:08
Speaker 1: We also can't get real clear answers or honest answers
20:11
Speaker 1: about how many people were instigators in the crowd that
20:14
Speaker 1: were actually on the government payroll. And we're talking about
20:17
Speaker 1: on the government dime. Ray Epps was just now charged
20:20
Speaker 1: with some joke of a crime. Many believed that ray
20:22
Speaker 1: Epps was a guy that some have described and media
20:25
Speaker 1: accounts as being an informant of the FBI. We still
20:27
Speaker 1: haven't been able to get a direct or clear answer
20:29
Speaker 1: on that. And why was ray Epps not charge of
20:32
Speaker 1: crimes until he was charged with a slap on the
20:34
Speaker 1: wrist of a crime made Joe Biden or i say
20:37
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden type of slap on the wrist for what
20:40
Speaker 1: he clearly did on Janeity six compared to others who
20:42
Speaker 1: are going to spend more than a decade in prison,
20:46
Speaker 1: more than a decade in prison. I say all of
20:50
Speaker 1: this to put it in perspective before I tell you
20:52
Speaker 1: the next story, because the next story should make everyone
20:56
Speaker 1: very angry. There is a congressman who was a grand
21:01
Speaker 1: stander who is a race baiter by the name of
21:03
Speaker 1: Jamalt Bowman. He is now quote under investigation for pulling
21:09
Speaker 1: a fire alarm inside the US Capital to delay the
21:14
Speaker 1: vote to avoid a government shut down. The squad member,
21:19
Speaker 1: this member of the squad, the AOC type squad member.
21:24
Speaker 1: So I thought the alarm would open the door. That
21:26
Speaker 1: is now the excuse. Photos, however, disprove that ridiculous, outlandish claim.
21:36
Speaker 1: The House Administration Committee, the Capitol Police, they now say
21:39
Speaker 1: they are in fact investigating this individual. Now, if that's
21:42
Speaker 1: not the definition of insurrectionist, I don't know what is.
21:45
Speaker 1: You have a sitting member of Congress ripped down by
21:49
Speaker 1: the way, two signs warning, a second four door and
21:52
Speaker 1: the Cannon House office building was for emergency use only
21:55
Speaker 1: before then pulling the fire alarm and running out through
21:58
Speaker 1: a different door on a diff front floor. So the
22:01
Speaker 1: idea that he was confused or thought it would open
22:04
Speaker 1: the door, we know is a lie, just from what
22:06
Speaker 1: I explained to you. Multiple sources now familiar with the
22:10
Speaker 1: investigation to Bowman pulling the firearm in the house, which
22:13
Speaker 1: triggered a full scale law enforcement and emergency services response
22:19
Speaker 1: leading to the evacuation of the building are now saying
22:23
Speaker 1: that Bowman ripped these two signs down through them on
22:25
Speaker 1: the ground. First, the sources familiar with the investigation are
22:32
Speaker 1: in essence at this point, I think whistleblowing so this
22:34
Speaker 1: doesn't get swept under the rug. There are new photographs
22:38
Speaker 1: the scene of the alleged crime later, after the emergency
22:42
Speaker 1: door had been restored after damage Bowen did to it
22:45
Speaker 1: showing the signs. This again is another example of the
22:51
Speaker 1: pure evil in the Democratic Party. Now, in the photos
22:56
Speaker 1: of the double doors with glass windows, there are clearly
22:58
Speaker 1: two giant red signs on the door. They both say
23:01
Speaker 1: emergency exit only push until alarm sounds three second. Stores
23:05
Speaker 1: will unlock in thirty seconds. There is also another sign
23:09
Speaker 1: on a stand in front of the door that makes
23:11
Speaker 1: it clear this is an emergency exit only. Off to
23:15
Speaker 1: the left on the wall is the fire alarm that
23:18
Speaker 1: Bowman pulled. The fire alarm clearly states it is a
23:21
Speaker 1: fire alarm. The photograph of Bowman pulling the fire alarm,
23:25
Speaker 1: which Capit Police already released publicly shows the two red
23:28
Speaker 1: signs that are normally affixed the window are no longer there,
23:31
Speaker 1: so therefore he ripped them down right. This is what
23:34
Speaker 1: we know, and a source familiar with the matter said
23:37
Speaker 1: Bowman casually, as the House was holding open the House
23:41
Speaker 1: Democrat's motion to adjourned vote earlier in the day, walked
23:44
Speaker 1: up to the door and then ripped the emergency signs
23:47
Speaker 1: off and threw them on the ground.
23:48
Speaker 2: He ripped both of them off the door and threw
23:50
Speaker 2: them both on the floor, the source says.
23:52
Speaker 1: Then he leaned and to the door and tit tied
23:56
Speaker 1: and tried to open it. The source added, then he
23:58
Speaker 1: pulled the fire alarm. When the alarm begins going off,
24:01
Speaker 1: he turns around and ran, going down to the first
24:04
Speaker 1: four of cannon off this building and exit out a
24:08
Speaker 1: different door than made his way across the street to votes.
24:12
Speaker 1: At no point did he say to anyone, sorry, this
24:14
Speaker 1: is a mistake, or sorry I pulled the fire alarm
24:17
Speaker 1: by mistake, or anything like that. He didn't say anything
24:20
Speaker 1: to anyone until he was confronted by Capitol police later
24:23
Speaker 1: that day. By doing that, by doing what he did,
24:28
Speaker 1: he caused a whole building to be evacuated. Capitol police
24:31
Speaker 1: and emergency services needed to treat any arm like a
24:34
Speaker 1: real threat until they know otherwise, like a terrorist event.
24:38
Speaker 1: These factors also undercut his official public statement that he
24:42
Speaker 1: was trying to get out of the door. He did
24:44
Speaker 1: not try to get out the door. He did not
24:47
Speaker 1: wait the thirty seconds like the sign said. He clearly
24:50
Speaker 1: did not follow the instructions on the emergency signs. He
24:53
Speaker 1: later told reporters, I thought the alarm would open the door.
24:56
Speaker 1: This guy should be in jail, and he sure as
24:58
Speaker 1: hell shouldn't be in congres. And yet this story you're
25:02
Speaker 1: probably hearing nothing about it. Why because the Democrats they
25:06
Speaker 1: don't care, and they don't believe January six was actually
25:08
Speaker 1: an insurrection. I want to be clear about that. They
25:10
Speaker 1: don't care. Please share this podcast with your family and friends.
25:15
Speaker 1: Please make sure you write us a five star review
25:18
Speaker 1: wherever you're listening to this podcast, so that it will
25:21
Speaker 1: help us reach more people.
25:22
Speaker 2: And we will see you back here tomorrow