Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / JOE AND HUNTER BIDEN CRIME FAMILY RECAP: Our Series Into This Crime Family EXPOSE' Starts HERE!

Transcript

JOE AND HUNTER BIDEN CRIME FAMILY RECAP: Our Series Into This Crime Family EXPOSE' Starts HERE! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: All right, we are starting a five part series because
0:04
Speaker 1: that's how much information there is that we need to
0:07
Speaker 1: get out on Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and the new
0:11
Speaker 1: connections with China. And they're going much bigger this time
0:17
Speaker 1: than just Hunter Biden and Joe Biden. They're getting their
0:20
Speaker 1: tentacles into people like John Bayner and Nancy Pelosi, to
0:24
Speaker 1: people that held the same job, one a Republican and
0:27
Speaker 1: one a Democrat. And I'm going to go through this,
0:30
Speaker 1: but I want to start with the calls for a
0:33
Speaker 1: special counsel to be appointed in why people are now
0:36
Speaker 1: saying this. US Senator Marsha Blackburn is now calling for
0:41
Speaker 1: a special counsel to be convened to look into the
0:46
Speaker 1: connections between Hunter Biden Joe Biden. Hunters are Joe Biden's
0:51
Speaker 1: brother and the Biden crime family as I call them.
0:54
Speaker 1: Now you have two more high profile House Republicans are
0:58
Speaker 1: joining a push for the Attorney General Merritt Garland to
1:01
Speaker 1: appoint a Justice Department special counsel to investigate President Joe
1:06
Speaker 1: Biden's entire family with their business ties to the Chinese
1:08
Speaker 1: Communist Party. House GEOP Conference Chairman Stephani and Representative Madison
1:16
Speaker 1: Cawthorne both confirmed this week that they support the growing
1:21
Speaker 1: calls for a special council appointment. Now, a quick reminder,
1:26
Speaker 1: if you're listening to this podcast, please make sure you
1:28
Speaker 1: hit the subscriber auto download button and tell your friends
1:32
Speaker 1: about this podcast, Share this on social media, and if
1:34
Speaker 1: you would write us a five star review to help us,
1:37
Speaker 1: as Democrats have been attacking our podcasts recently with bad reviews.
1:41
Speaker 1: Now their statement comes after the New York Post Editorial
1:45
Speaker 1: Board announced their support for a special counsel to investigate
1:49
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden and the Biden's family's Chinese business dealings. This
1:54
Speaker 1: after Blackburn did so earlier in the week. Now I'm
1:58
Speaker 1: going to read for you part of the New York
2:01
Speaker 1: Posts and what they had to say their opinion editorial
2:05
Speaker 1: posted by the editorial boards at a point of special
2:07
Speaker 1: counsel on Hunter Biden. Now why, Well, here's the background.
2:13
Speaker 1: In two and eighteen, the US Attorney in Delaware began
2:17
Speaker 1: quietly investigating Hunter Biden's financial activities. The probe was slowed
2:23
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty on purpose, we now know, as the
2:26
Speaker 1: presidential election approached. Now it's February of twenty twenty two.
2:32
Speaker 1: How much longer could the FEDS take when they started
2:35
Speaker 1: this thing basically four years ago. At this point, you
2:39
Speaker 1: have to wonder if any investigation would still be under
2:43
Speaker 1: way were it not for the laptop Hunter abandoned in
2:47
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, and if the Post reported on what was
2:51
Speaker 1: on that laptop and social media and big tech silenced
2:54
Speaker 1: it days before the election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, that,
3:00
Speaker 1: after all, dragged evidence of Hunter's dubious doings in too light,
3:05
Speaker 1: despite the best efforts of the medium big tech to
3:08
Speaker 1: suppress all of that reporting by the Post, the business
3:13
Speaker 1: dealings plainly greased by his father's connections, his international connections,
3:18
Speaker 1: and domestic political might. It was very clear that Joe
3:23
Speaker 1: Biden was telling his son, Hunter Biden and his brother,
3:26
Speaker 1: go make the family a lot of money and use
3:28
Speaker 1: me to do it. They were doing this the entire
3:31
Speaker 1: time that Joe Biden was a vice president for eight years.
3:34
Speaker 1: In fact, his brother had been doing it for decades
3:37
Speaker 1: when he was in the Senate. But when Hunter Biden
3:41
Speaker 1: got to be of age and Hunter Biden couldn't keep
3:44
Speaker 1: a job of his own, he decided to start trading
3:47
Speaker 1: off his father's name. And his father was a part
3:49
Speaker 1: of it, and in fact, I would argue that it's
3:51
Speaker 1: very clear now that Hunter Biden's business dealings would never
3:54
Speaker 1: have come to fruition if it wasn't for his father's
3:57
Speaker 1: not just support, but involvement in all of his business dealings,
4:00
Speaker 1: which he lied about during the campaign. Clang he knew
4:03
Speaker 1: nothing about his son's business dealings, and then pictures start
4:06
Speaker 1: to surface of him playing golf with all the people
4:08
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden does business with. We know from that
4:12
Speaker 1: famous audio recording that Hunter Biden was on the board
4:16
Speaker 1: of Barisma in Ukraine. We also know now that there's
4:20
Speaker 1: a good reason, there may be a very good reason
4:22
Speaker 1: why Joe Biden has taking his hand off Ukraine, because
4:24
Speaker 1: Ukraine screwed his family's business and the empire that he
4:28
Speaker 1: had built, where his son and his brother traded political
4:31
Speaker 1: favors to get in connection with now the President of
4:35
Speaker 1: the United States of America. I go back to the
4:38
Speaker 1: point I'm in a moment ago. You've got to wonder
4:40
Speaker 1: if any investigation would still be underway if it were
4:43
Speaker 1: not for the laptop Hunter abandoned. Now we had all
4:47
Speaker 1: the business dealings plainly put out there in his own
4:51
Speaker 1: words and his own emails. It was very clear this
4:53
Speaker 1: father was forced to grease the wheels to get any
4:56
Speaker 1: of these business deals done, which he lied about. And
5:01
Speaker 1: we also know that there was money going to the
5:02
Speaker 1: big guy, which was very clearly Joe Biden. Now it's
5:08
Speaker 1: tricky for any justice department to investigate the president and
5:11
Speaker 1: his family, and this is one has already shown clear
5:15
Speaker 1: signs of politicalization this Justice department, the Attorney General Merrick
5:20
Speaker 1: Garland himself playing along with a white house eager to
5:24
Speaker 1: put the fear of the FBID parents who want to
5:26
Speaker 1: speak their minds at local school board meeting shows you
5:29
Speaker 1: just how political the FBI has become. It's pastime. The
5:33
Speaker 1: post says for Garland to explain why he hasn't named
5:36
Speaker 1: a special counsel. The amount of money going to the family,
5:40
Speaker 1: the Biden crime family, well over thirty million dollars directly
5:44
Speaker 1: coming from China. All of this has come out, This
5:47
Speaker 1: idea has been battled around at least since Hunter Biden's
5:51
Speaker 1: art seal's surface as well. Now let's hit pause and
5:54
Speaker 1: talk about those art selling finger paintings for a moment. A. G.
6:00
Speaker 1: Garland has been asked to appoint a special counsel to
6:04
Speaker 1: investigate Hunter Biden. Part of it's because of the art
6:08
Speaker 1: that has been sold. What is it worth? The Attorney
6:11
Speaker 1: General was pressed recently to appoint a special counsel to
6:15
Speaker 1: investigate the art cells alone of Hunter Biden's and the
6:19
Speaker 1: President's son. Where some of that art is even in
6:22
Speaker 1: the White House right now? His novice works have been sold.
6:28
Speaker 1: We've been told of upwards of a half a million dollars.
6:31
Speaker 1: Representative Ken Back, a Republican from Colorado, began his line
6:34
Speaker 1: of questioning in a House Judiciary Committee hearing by showing
6:37
Speaker 1: two piece of artwork from Claude Money and Edgar Degas
6:44
Speaker 1: listed and sold at Christie's for seven hundred thousand and
6:47
Speaker 1: a half million, respectively. Now you know the name Money,
6:50
Speaker 1: you know the name DEGs is these are some of
6:53
Speaker 1: the most famous names in art, and their artwork sold
6:57
Speaker 1: at Christie's for seven hundred thousand and five hundred thousand, respectively.
7:01
Speaker 1: Immediately after, he showed a third painting. You may recognize
7:05
Speaker 1: his painting as a Hunter Biden. The Hunter Biden painting
7:08
Speaker 1: sold for five hundred thousand bucks, said, noting that the
7:11
Speaker 1: president son lacks an artistic background and was unable to
7:14
Speaker 1: find a gallery to listen his artwork in before his
7:17
Speaker 1: dad became president in twenty twenty. He went on to say,
7:21
Speaker 1: and what happened in twenty twenty that changed all that
7:25
Speaker 1: is that his name became valuable because his dad became
7:29
Speaker 1: the president of the United States of America. Now a
7:31
Speaker 1: single piece of art from Hunter Biden seals for more
7:33
Speaker 1: than the average American home. To put it in perspective,
7:39
Speaker 1: how is it that two of the most famous artists
7:41
Speaker 1: of all time, Monet and Degas, had painting selling for
7:44
Speaker 1: the same exact amount as Hunter Biden. If it wasn't
7:48
Speaker 1: for his father being in the White House, this wouldn't
7:50
Speaker 1: be happening. But proceed to ask Garland if he would
7:53
Speaker 1: appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden just on
7:57
Speaker 1: the issue of the art. Noting his off sent a
8:00
Speaker 1: letter of the Department of Justice. Justice making the same request.
8:03
Speaker 1: Quote for the same reason, I'm I'm not to respond
8:06
Speaker 1: to questions about investigations of the former president or anyone else.
8:10
Speaker 1: I'm not going to discuss or otherwise with respect to
8:13
Speaker 1: any US citizen Garland's answer, So he decided to invoke
8:18
Speaker 1: Trump there and investigations in the Trump is the reason
8:20
Speaker 1: why he wouldn't comment conresson. Buck pushed back again, saying
8:25
Speaker 1: you are allowed to tell us whether you will appoint
8:28
Speaker 1: a special counsel. Garland responded by saying he was unaware
8:33
Speaker 1: that Buck's office had sent the letter. Now, as Buck's
8:36
Speaker 1: time expired, Representive Eric Swalwell mocked his colleague's line of questions, saying,
8:40
Speaker 1: General Garland, you may not get these four hours back,
8:44
Speaker 1: but you may get some art history credit for today.
8:48
Speaker 1: That is how Eric Swalwell, the guy who was sleeping
8:51
Speaker 1: literally with the enemy Chinese spies, decided to respond, you
8:56
Speaker 1: know where his allegiance clearly lay no pun intend ended.
9:01
Speaker 1: Buck's letter outlined a DJ criminal tax investigation into Hunter
9:06
Speaker 1: Biden that was launched last year, which is another reason
9:10
Speaker 1: why the amount of smoke coming out of the House
9:15
Speaker 1: of Biden, the family to Biden, has not It's no
9:18
Speaker 1: longer smoke. It's a full blown fire. I would argue
9:22
Speaker 1: a five alarm fire, which exactly why we're going to
9:27
Speaker 1: do a five part series on this family, because there's
9:29
Speaker 1: too much information to get into you just one or
9:33
Speaker 1: two conversations. Now, Buck's letter not only outlined the DJ's
9:37
Speaker 1: criminal tax investigation, to Hunter Biden that was launched last year,
9:40
Speaker 1: but he also noted the possible involvement of the President
9:43
Speaker 1: of the United States of America as well now Congresson
9:47
Speaker 1: Buck also said it's now apparent that President Biden could
9:51
Speaker 1: be directly implicated in the ongoing investigations into his son's
9:56
Speaker 1: money transfers and dealings, raising serious questions regarding whether then
10:02
Speaker 1: Vice President Joe Biden was aware of and possibly benefited
10:07
Speaker 1: from the influence peddling operation led by his son. Based
10:11
Speaker 1: on Hunter Biden's own words, it's very clear that that
10:15
Speaker 1: is a reality. Quote. It's now more critical than ever
10:20
Speaker 1: to appoint a special counsel who can lead the investigation
10:22
Speaker 1: in an impartial way. As outlined in twenty eight c
10:27
Speaker 1: f R six hundred, the Attorney General has the right
10:30
Speaker 1: to appoint a special counsel to investigate and prosecute matters
10:33
Speaker 1: and individuals that present a conflict of interest for the
10:37
Speaker 1: Department when it is in the public's interest. Allowing the
10:41
Speaker 1: investigation to continue to be handled according to the normal
10:44
Speaker 1: practices of the Department means that Senate confirm political appointees
10:50
Speaker 1: who can only be removed from office by the President
10:53
Speaker 1: are now overseeing an investigation into his sons and possibly
10:58
Speaker 1: his financial dealings to a prior or possible ongoing influence
11:03
Speaker 1: peddling scheme. Now let me just pause right there, and
11:07
Speaker 1: I got to go back. We already know for a
11:09
Speaker 1: fact that the Department of Justice has a criminal tax
11:12
Speaker 1: investigation on Hunter Biden that was launched last year. That
11:16
Speaker 1: is a fact. It's an undisputed fact. It is. You
11:19
Speaker 1: can't say it's not true. You can't say it's not happening.
11:23
Speaker 1: That's number one. Okay, And again, everybody it's listening to
11:27
Speaker 1: this right now. You need to be writing this down.
11:29
Speaker 1: You need to be sharing our five part series of
11:33
Speaker 1: our podcast with everybody you know, because this is the
11:36
Speaker 1: stuff that people don't know in this country that they
11:38
Speaker 1: need to know. Number Two, you have Hunter Biden selling
11:43
Speaker 1: artwork for the same price as Monet and degaz are
11:45
Speaker 1: going for it Christie's, which is a huge problem. And
11:51
Speaker 1: we also know that there's been an open investigation into
11:54
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden since two thousand and eighteen. No person is
12:00
Speaker 1: above the law, not even the President of the United
12:01
Speaker 1: States of America in theory. We clearly know that's not true.
12:04
Speaker 1: In this scenario. The attorney General was also later pressed
12:08
Speaker 1: on the issue by Representative Tom McClintock from California, who
12:13
Speaker 1: noted that other communications from hunter Biden have indicated his
12:17
Speaker 1: finances were intertwined with the presidents. He said, quote, if
12:22
Speaker 1: that doesn't call for an independent investigation to the president,
12:25
Speaker 1: what would. I'm not going to comment quote unquote about
12:28
Speaker 1: the investigation, but because everyone knows there is an investigation
12:32
Speaker 1: going on in Delaware by the US attorney who was
12:34
Speaker 1: appointed by the previous administration, and I can't comment on
12:38
Speaker 1: any further information than that. As recently his last month,
12:44
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden has been criticized for the price of his
12:46
Speaker 1: artwork and lack of transparency regarding the buying process. In fact,
12:52
Speaker 1: at least five prints of his artwork have already been
12:54
Speaker 1: sold for seventy five thousand each. That is a print,
12:57
Speaker 1: meaning a duplicate, not even the original of art. It's
13:00
Speaker 1: a duplicate and a team of lawyers as vetting potential
13:04
Speaker 1: patrons who planned to attend his upcoming gallery show in
13:08
Speaker 1: New York City in the spring. The George Burgess Gallery
13:12
Speaker 1: sold The Prince before the October one opening of a
13:16
Speaker 1: pop up presentation in Los Angeles. According to report earlier
13:19
Speaker 1: this month. It's also unclear who purchased the reproductions, which
13:24
Speaker 1: cost a fraction of the top price of a half
13:27
Speaker 1: million for an original piece by Hunter Biden, or if
13:30
Speaker 1: any more were sold after the LA show opened. The
13:35
Speaker 1: director of the US Office of Government Ethics under present
13:39
Speaker 1: Barack Obama has even come out now and called for
13:43
Speaker 1: the cell of the artwork to flat out be canceled
13:47
Speaker 1: or for the names of the buyers to be disclosed
13:50
Speaker 1: to prevent secretive influence buying. Now, the response from the
13:55
Speaker 1: White House has actually been exactly what you would expect
13:59
Speaker 1: from a senile, angry Joe Biden. Earlier this month, the
14:04
Speaker 1: present was finally asked by a New York Post reporter
14:09
Speaker 1: if he was concerned about the potential corruption involving his
14:13
Speaker 1: son's artwork and the cell of it for the same
14:16
Speaker 1: amount of money as Monai's, and his answer was exactly
14:20
Speaker 1: what you would expect from an angry Joe Biden quote.
14:24
Speaker 1: You gotta be kidding me. We also know that Joe
14:29
Speaker 1: Biden is helping his son's artwork by putting it in
14:33
Speaker 1: the White House. Now, I want to go back to
14:35
Speaker 1: another part of this story, just for a moment, because
14:37
Speaker 1: I think this is so important to understand how big
14:40
Speaker 1: of a deal this is and how nonpartisan this should
14:42
Speaker 1: actually be. Ex Obama Ethics chief is now knocking the
14:48
Speaker 1: White House and the White House Press Secretary for dismissing
14:52
Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden questions. This is not a conservative, it's
14:56
Speaker 1: the former head of the federal government's ethics office. Barack
15:00
Speaker 1: Obama rebuke the White House Press Secretary a day after
15:05
Speaker 1: she brushed off The Post questions about whether the identity
15:08
Speaker 1: of the buyers for Hunter Biden's artwork would remain anonymous. Now,
15:12
Speaker 1: the Post has done an amazing job ever since they
15:15
Speaker 1: were attacked for the laptop story, and that story was
15:18
Speaker 1: silenced by big tech Twitter and Facebook and all the others,
15:21
Speaker 1: and the news media refused to report on it because
15:24
Speaker 1: they knew it would cost Joe Biden the presidency. The
15:29
Speaker 1: Post reported last week that five of the First Son's
15:32
Speaker 1: Prince again not original artwork Prince of the artwork sold
15:37
Speaker 1: for seventy five thousand apiece, and that prospective buyers attending
15:41
Speaker 1: an upcoming York show were being vetted by teams of lawyers.
15:45
Speaker 1: I know this is your favorite topic, but again it
15:49
Speaker 1: still is the purview of the Galris Jinsaki said during
15:54
Speaker 1: her briefing, we still do not know and will not
15:57
Speaker 1: know who purchases any pains, and the present remains proud
16:01
Speaker 1: of his son. I bet she does. His son's making
16:03
Speaker 1: a crap down of money as much as mmmay putting
16:05
Speaker 1: up finger paintings. The Press Secretary then cut off further
16:09
Speaker 1: inquiries about the matter by asking, did you have another
16:12
Speaker 1: question on something else? Otherwise We're going to move on
16:15
Speaker 1: to some other topics. Lots going on in the world,
16:17
Speaker 1: as she mocked the media for asking such a ridiculous question.
16:21
Speaker 1: Read that response through the year of Walter Swab, who
16:26
Speaker 1: directed the US Office of Government Ethics during the Obama's
16:29
Speaker 1: second term and left that post in the summer of
16:32
Speaker 1: twenty seventeen. These are legitimate questions, he began a lengthy
16:37
Speaker 1: Twitter thread. It's disappointing to hear Saki send a message
16:40
Speaker 1: at the White House thinks the public has no right
16:43
Speaker 1: to ask about ethics after the last four years, referring
16:47
Speaker 1: to Donald Trump, these questions have never been more important.
16:50
Speaker 1: I know this isn't a popular opinion, but this stuff matters.
16:53
Speaker 1: These are legitimate questions. It's disappointing that they would continue
16:57
Speaker 1: to do this. A swab and others and government experts
17:01
Speaker 1: have repeatedly warned that the cell of Hunter Biden's art
17:04
Speaker 1: was likely to draw the interests a perspective foreign buyers
17:08
Speaker 1: seeking to curry favor with his father's administration. The questions
17:12
Speaker 1: grew louder after Los Angeles Mayor, Biden's nominee to be
17:16
Speaker 1: ambassador to India attended his first Sons Hollywood showing earlier
17:21
Speaker 1: this month than People are wondering if that mayor actually
17:23
Speaker 1: bought Biden's artwork, which would guarantee him the ambassadorship to India. Quote,
17:29
Speaker 1: there's no ethics program in the world that can be
17:32
Speaker 1: built around the Head of States staff working with a
17:35
Speaker 1: dealer to keep the public and the dark about the
17:37
Speaker 1: identities of individuals who are paying vast sums to the
17:42
Speaker 1: leader's family members for subjectively priced items of no base value.
17:51
Speaker 1: If there were Trump doing this Pjing Vladimir Putin, you'd
17:57
Speaker 1: have no doubt whatsoever that this creates a vehicle for
18:01
Speaker 1: funneling cash to the first family in exchange for access
18:05
Speaker 1: or favors. Nor would you doubt that the appearance of
18:08
Speaker 1: monetizing the presidency was outrageous. If it were Trump, Ze
18:12
Speaker 1: or Putin, this would be a different story. He's absolutely right.
18:18
Speaker 1: The source told The Post last week that George's Burgess's
18:23
Speaker 1: Gallery has implemented the screening process ahead of Hunter Biden's show,
18:28
Speaker 1: which has been delayed until a little bit later this year.
18:34
Speaker 1: It was unclear who hired the legal team performing the quote.
18:37
Speaker 1: Vetting shob Of, frequent critic of former President Donald Trump,
18:41
Speaker 1: tweeted that while the forty fifth president's ethical transgressions were worse,
18:45
Speaker 1: the distraction the excuse me, the distinction doesn't matter. So
18:49
Speaker 1: this is an anti Trump guy who thinks Donald Trump's
18:52
Speaker 1: the worst person in the world, is still saying this. Now,
18:56
Speaker 1: you got to ask a question about the Los Angeles
18:58
Speaker 1: mayor as well, attending Biden's first art show in Hollywood,
19:02
Speaker 1: a guy that's trying to become an ambassador to India. Quote,
19:05
Speaker 1: it's all the worst because Biden ran as the anecdote
19:09
Speaker 1: to Trump. So the message is that this is not
19:11
Speaker 1: just that we're not just better than Trump, which is
19:15
Speaker 1: far too low a standard, but that this is the
19:17
Speaker 1: opposite of Trump, which is even worse. President Biden himself
19:21
Speaker 1: was asked as he left the White House on Friday,
19:23
Speaker 1: if he was concerned about potential corruption involving his son's
19:26
Speaker 1: art sales, come on, man, that's the response you get
19:30
Speaker 1: from the president. Eric Trump had a very interesting conversation.
19:35
Speaker 1: He has a very interesting perspective because Eric Trump is
19:37
Speaker 1: publican I mean number one, because his dad is Donald Trump.
19:42
Speaker 1: And he sat down and had a conversation with a
19:45
Speaker 1: good friend of mine, Dan Bongino, and part of their
19:48
Speaker 1: conversation was about not just the double standard here, but
19:53
Speaker 1: how insane this story actually is. And I want you
19:56
Speaker 1: to hear part of what Eric Trump had to say
19:58
Speaker 1: about these paintings and him saying, imagine if I would
20:02
Speaker 1: have done this, what would have happened to me? Question
20:04
Speaker 1: for you? Your family has been the subject of ridiculous,
20:07
Speaker 1: endless which hunts here and this is kind of strange.
20:10
Speaker 1: His confidential emails now emerged from the Obama State Department
20:14
Speaker 1: showing that insiders in the Ukrainian Embassy had some real
20:17
Speaker 1: suspicions about what Hunter Biden was up to. And we'll
20:20
Speaker 1: see here as they said, the real issue, to my mind,
20:22
Speaker 1: this is from the Deputy Chief Emission, George kenn was
20:24
Speaker 1: that someone in Washington needed to engage VP Biden quietly
20:28
Speaker 1: and say that his son Hunter's presence on the Barisma
20:31
Speaker 1: board undercut the anti corruption message the VP and we
20:34
Speaker 1: were advancing in Ukraine. You know what's really strange, Eric,
20:37
Speaker 1: during the impeachment hoax against your dad, the defense team
20:41
Speaker 1: never got a hold of this email about Hunter Biden
20:43
Speaker 1: was up there. Maybe they were too busy investigating you
20:46
Speaker 1: guys for a golf course or something, or a real
20:49
Speaker 1: estate operation you guys were in. I mean, this has
20:51
Speaker 1: to really kind of piss you off. This to be
20:53
Speaker 1: candid about it. Yeah, yeah, conveniently they missed it. You
20:56
Speaker 1: know why because the big guy, if you remember the
20:58
Speaker 1: other emails, right, the big guy was getting ten percent.
21:01
Speaker 1: We're gonna save ten percent for the big guy, and
21:02
Speaker 1: that's right. They will investigate us. If we have a
21:05
Speaker 1: calm out of place, they'll go after us. You know, Dan,
21:07
Speaker 1: you know me pretty well as a guy. I'm a
21:08
Speaker 1: straight guy, no drugs, no nonsense. I'm the first to
21:11
Speaker 1: one up you know in the morning. I worked very
21:13
Speaker 1: very hard. Could you imagine the world that, you know,
21:16
Speaker 1: when my father was commander in chief. Forget about Hunter,
21:18
Speaker 1: whose father was you know, Vice president. But could you
21:20
Speaker 1: imagine in a world where you know, where Donald Trump
21:23
Speaker 1: was commander in chief and I was doing crystal meth
21:26
Speaker 1: and heroin and you know, dating my deceased brother's wife
21:29
Speaker 1: and all the other things that were happening. I mean, Dan,
21:32
Speaker 1: I'd be dead. I'd be dead. And by the way,
21:33
Speaker 1: they don't they don't even try and stop it. I mean,
21:36
Speaker 1: right now, with Joe Biden as president, the guy is
21:38
Speaker 1: still out their finger painting. He's selling those for hundreds
21:41
Speaker 1: of thousands of dollars. Could you imagine if I was
21:43
Speaker 1: selling my artwork as an unqualified artist to people in
21:47
Speaker 1: you know, New York, you know, unknown people, Dan, I'd
21:50
Speaker 1: be honest. Yeah, I can't imagine that, Eric, because I
21:57
Speaker 1: enjoyed have to hang out with you in prison, because
21:59
Speaker 1: I what did I tell you at the Nity? I said, Eric,
22:01
Speaker 1: you know, maybe you should do a paything for charity
22:04
Speaker 1: or something and the media lose their mind if you
22:06
Speaker 1: donated the money. I think that's the great idea. I mean,
22:09
Speaker 1: this is how crazy these people, aren't. You don't hear
22:13
Speaker 1: about this guy. You don't hear about this guy. No, No,
22:15
Speaker 1: you won't want I think that one of the interesting
22:18
Speaker 1: points he just made there was how did they miss
22:20
Speaker 1: this email? You heard Eric Trump mentioned that, like how
22:23
Speaker 1: do you miss this email? How does this even happen?
22:27
Speaker 1: Did you really miss it? Or was it just done
22:29
Speaker 1: on purpose? Because I have a feeling it's probably an
22:33
Speaker 1: issue of it being on purpose. This wasn't this was
22:38
Speaker 1: an accident. This was done on purpose. It's very clear
22:42
Speaker 1: it was done on purpose. And now all of a
22:45
Speaker 1: sudden it just happens to show up. And that's now
22:49
Speaker 1: where we are with this. Ari Flasher. Former White House
22:53
Speaker 1: Press Secretary for George W. Bush said this, and he's
22:59
Speaker 1: absolute right on Fox News Channel about Hunter. Biden's Press
23:04
Speaker 1: secretary Jen Saki is refusing to say who bought Hunter
23:08
Speaker 1: Biden's recently sold stake in a Chinese firm. This despite
23:12
Speaker 1: critics demanding transparency from the White House, saying the president's
23:16
Speaker 1: son and his business dealings raise huge ethics concerns. Listen
23:20
Speaker 1: to this exchange from yesterday's briefing. Shortly after President Biden's
23:24
Speaker 1: virtual meeting with the Chinese President's her son's attorney said
23:29
Speaker 1: that he has finally divested from a Chinese investment fund
23:33
Speaker 1: controlled by state owned entities. I was hoping you could
23:35
Speaker 1: commit to basic transparency about that transaction, including at the
23:39
Speaker 1: name of the buyer or the dollar amount and the timing.
23:41
Speaker 1: The President's son is not an employee of the federal government,
23:44
Speaker 1: so I'd point you to his representatives, oh Ari. If
23:49
Speaker 1: this was under a different administration, dare I suggest the
23:53
Speaker 1: answer would have been probably far different, and so too
23:56
Speaker 1: with the media reaction. That is exactly what I was thinking.
23:59
Speaker 1: If this is one of the Trump children, this would
24:01
Speaker 1: be a feeding frenzy in the press because they know
24:03
Speaker 1: it's connected to the president. And in the case of
24:06
Speaker 1: the Trump children, at least they were actual legitimate business people,
24:11
Speaker 1: unlike Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden has made a career of
24:15
Speaker 1: cashing in on his last name and having relationships with
24:19
Speaker 1: powerful people, often international, who want access to the president,
24:23
Speaker 1: the vice president, and now the President, or the perception
24:25
Speaker 1: of access that he was selling. This is a problem
24:29
Speaker 1: throughout the administration, and the biggest issue that it frustrates
24:33
Speaker 1: me to no end is how most of the White
24:34
Speaker 1: House press corps could care less. They just let it
24:37
Speaker 1: go because it's Joe Biden. And this is part of
24:40
Speaker 1: the whole original problem with the way the press covered
24:42
Speaker 1: the Biden campaign from the start and the way they
24:45
Speaker 1: cover him now as president. They just don't think there
24:47
Speaker 1: could possibly be an ethical lapse, a problem caused by
24:52
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's son. They roll their eyes when they hear
24:54
Speaker 1: the word Hunter. Well, it's a legitimate inquiry than the
24:57
Speaker 1: White House ought to answer it. It's a legit, intimate
25:00
Speaker 1: inquiry in the White House ought to answer it. Nori
25:03
Speaker 1: Flesher's a guy that I've known for a long time.
25:06
Speaker 1: You noticed in his responsories, not a guy to overhype things.
25:10
Speaker 1: But he's making a very clear, not just accusation, it's
25:13
Speaker 1: based on the facts. Hunter Biden has made a career
25:15
Speaker 1: of cashing in on his last name, and we know
25:20
Speaker 1: that his last name is directly connected in every business
25:24
Speaker 1: deal to the influence of his father, which is exactly
25:27
Speaker 1: why Jansaki is refusing to answer questions about Hunter Biden
25:30
Speaker 1: time and time and time and time and time again.
25:33
Speaker 1: Add the Biden administrations report that address in corruption. I
25:39
Speaker 1: was to ask you too quick and hopefully pretty easy
25:41
Speaker 1: questions about that um. Shortly after President Biden's virtual meeting
25:46
Speaker 1: with the Chinese President's her son's attorney said that he
25:51
Speaker 1: has finally invested from a Chinese investment fund controlled by
25:55
Speaker 1: state ensities. I was hoping you could commit to basic
25:58
Speaker 1: transparency about that trans actually including the name of the
26:01
Speaker 1: buyer of the dollar mouth of the tithing. And the
26:03
Speaker 1: second question is my colleague brand of the Bayan has
26:06
Speaker 1: a new book out called The Laptop from Hell, and
26:09
Speaker 1: I was hoping that you could confirm that the laptop
26:12
Speaker 1: is indeed authentic and not rushing disuformation as you seem
26:16
Speaker 1: to suggest us Twitter last year. Well, on the first,
26:21
Speaker 1: the President's son is not an employee of the federal government,
26:23
Speaker 1: so I'd point you to his representatives. And as it
26:26
Speaker 1: relates to the book, I have norther neither had the
26:28
Speaker 1: time nor interest in exploring or reading the book. Go ahead, ahead,
26:33
Speaker 1: I think I answered your question. Go ahead. You can
26:35
Speaker 1: go to the representative of the person who's not an
26:37
Speaker 1: employee of the federal government. Go ahead, Tina. I think
26:40
Speaker 1: we have to move on. I think we have to
26:42
Speaker 1: move on. I have no interest in reading this book,
26:45
Speaker 1: so therefore I'm not going to read this book now.
26:49
Speaker 1: Let me also remind you a Barack Obama's Press secretary
26:53
Speaker 1: Docking questions about Hunter Biden and Barisma This was back
26:57
Speaker 1: in twenty fourteen. This was a in November the fifth
27:01
Speaker 1: of twenty fourteen. And the reason why I'm playing all
27:03
Speaker 1: this for you is because I think it's so important
27:06
Speaker 1: to understand how long people have been whistle blowing on
27:09
Speaker 1: the corruption of the Biden family. We can go all
27:12
Speaker 1: the way back to twenty fourteen, when President Obama is
27:17
Speaker 1: in the White House twenty fourteen talking to Jake Carney
27:20
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden, about Hunter Biden, about Ukraine. Hunter Biden
27:24
Speaker 1: has not taken any position with the largest oil and
27:28
Speaker 1: gas company and holding company in Ukraine. Is there any
27:32
Speaker 1: concern about us the appearance of the of a conflict
27:36
Speaker 1: there the president to the Vice President's office, I saw
27:40
Speaker 1: those reports. Hunter Biden and other members of the Biden
27:45
Speaker 1: family are obviously private citizens and where they work is
27:51
Speaker 1: not does not reflect an endorsement by the administration or
27:56
Speaker 1: by the Vice president of president. But I would refer
27:58
Speaker 1: to the vice presidents of That was eight years ago,
28:08
Speaker 1: eight years ago. This crap has been going on for
28:12
Speaker 1: that long eight years ago. That was the White House
28:17
Speaker 1: having a comment on this issue. This guy's getting the
28:22
Speaker 1: same amount of money for artwork while he while his
28:26
Speaker 1: dad is the president. Wow, let me remind you of
28:32
Speaker 1: November of last year, actually October of last year, when
28:37
Speaker 1: Fox News asked a simple question, new emails showed Joe
28:40
Speaker 1: and Hunter Biden shared a bank account. Kind of a
28:42
Speaker 1: big deal, right, big news. You would think that the
28:46
Speaker 1: media would have gone wall to wall. Imagine if Eric
28:48
Speaker 1: Trump was sharing a joint bank account with the vice
28:52
Speaker 1: president of the president at the time. Well, while that's
28:56
Speaker 1: hanging in the air, consider this. White House Press Secretary
28:59
Speaker 1: John sack wodged more questions about Hunter Biden's recent art sales.
29:04
Speaker 1: That's hoping you could say the White House News who
29:06
Speaker 1: purchased the High Princeton, Whether there is indeed a departure
29:09
Speaker 1: to the arrangement that here would be even anonymity here.
29:12
Speaker 1: I know this is your favorite topic, but again it
29:16
Speaker 1: still is the purview of the gallerist. We still do
29:19
Speaker 1: not know and will not know who purchases any paintings,
29:23
Speaker 1: and the president remains proud of his son. I don't know.
29:26
Speaker 1: Is it just me when she says gallerist? It sounds
29:28
Speaker 1: like a James Bond character. Raymond Arroyo is in focus now,
29:32
Speaker 1: Fox News contributor. I'm not even going to concentrate on
29:35
Speaker 1: what Jensaki was saying. Because she knows these questions are
29:38
Speaker 1: going to keep coming. She can say whatever she wants
29:40
Speaker 1: about the reporters. How big of a problem are these
29:42
Speaker 1: new emails, Harris, It's a huge problem. I mean, and
29:46
Speaker 1: this has been going on since that laptop first surface.
29:49
Speaker 1: We know that with these conjoined accounts were hunter Biden
29:53
Speaker 1: even a complained to his daughter that he blew half
29:56
Speaker 1: his salary paying Pop POPSI he was paying the telephone bill.
30:02
Speaker 1: That's that's Biden. He was paying the telephone bill, doing
30:05
Speaker 1: the taxes there was. And the question is, Harris, if
30:10
Speaker 1: the money that was garnered from these foreign interests, which
30:14
Speaker 1: was basically influence peddling, if that money landed in the
30:18
Speaker 1: joint account, does that put Joe Biden on the hook
30:21
Speaker 1: as part of this FBI investigation we will see. I
30:25
Speaker 1: just can't even imagine how his son, Why would you
30:29
Speaker 1: want to share this, Like we know about the alleged
30:33
Speaker 1: drug abuse in his path, And I only say alleged
30:35
Speaker 1: because most of it's just on video than bank account
30:42
Speaker 1: with somebody like that. I mean, this guy is a walking,
30:45
Speaker 1: talking reality show. I mean, he's living like a drug lord.
30:48
Speaker 1: He's you know, with his brother's wife. He's got hookers,
30:52
Speaker 1: he's got crack all over the table. I mean, you
30:54
Speaker 1: think the Biden that's what he's got. Yeah, that's all
30:58
Speaker 1: we know at this far, that's what he admits to.
31:00
Speaker 1: But you think they'd want to keep this out of
31:02
Speaker 1: the public eye. Instead, we've now turned to a new grift,
31:07
Speaker 1: which is Hunter Biden artist, and he's put down the
31:11
Speaker 1: crack pipe and picked up the ink pipe. And we're
31:14
Speaker 1: now blowing ink splatters on canvas and selling them for
31:18
Speaker 1: seventy five to five hundred thousand a pop. And I
31:21
Speaker 1: love the idea of offshoring the ethics to the gallerist. Now,
31:26
Speaker 1: George Burgess, the guy who owns the gallery, he gets
31:29
Speaker 1: fifty percent of every sale Harris, of these of these items,
31:33
Speaker 1: of these prints, that's the going rate. So how he's
31:37
Speaker 1: the ethics are all of a sudden, I don't understand.
31:40
Speaker 1: And as far as concealing the buyers from Hunter Biden
31:44
Speaker 1: where a blindfolded that recent gallery showing in la I
31:47
Speaker 1: don't think so. No, you can see everybody. I mean
31:50
Speaker 1: there's video of it again. I mean, it's it's just egregiousness.
31:53
Speaker 1: In plain sight. So you mentioned half the gallery owner
31:57
Speaker 1: is getting. Didn't they just sell a slew of seven
32:00
Speaker 1: five thousand dollars apiece. That's a lot of money for
32:03
Speaker 1: the gallery owner. That's a sweet deal. You bet, you
32:06
Speaker 1: bet well, That's what I mean. There's conflicts of interest
32:08
Speaker 1: all over the place. And you know, Harris, the font
32:11
Speaker 1: of this is that group Rosemont Seneca, that was the
32:15
Speaker 1: investment firm that Hunter Biden founded in two thousand and nine.
32:20
Speaker 1: Who did he found it with. One of his partners
32:22
Speaker 1: was Chris Hines, that is the stepson of John Kerry,
32:27
Speaker 1: who at the time was the Secretary of Defense with
32:30
Speaker 1: the Vice president's son. Hines had the good sense when
32:34
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden joined that Ukraine Energy board, he stepped back.
32:38
Speaker 1: Why he was worried about the perception of corruption. You
32:42
Speaker 1: have airing of information on this, So glad to have
32:45
Speaker 1: you in focus. I mean, you hear all this. This
32:48
Speaker 1: has been going on for not just months, for years,
32:52
Speaker 1: for years. Nancy Pelosi came out and she said something
32:58
Speaker 1: to the athletes. Many people were just completely shocked at
33:02
Speaker 1: the way that she spoke to American athletes about what
33:06
Speaker 1: they should do and not do while competing in China.
33:10
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi is a woman by the way, that has
33:13
Speaker 1: been to China and actually protested in China. It's been
33:17
Speaker 1: caught on videos. She was one of the biggest critics
33:19
Speaker 1: of China early in her career. She went to one
33:24
Speaker 1: of the most famous sites of protests in China and
33:29
Speaker 1: even held up a banner. It was taken from her
33:32
Speaker 1: by the Chinese Communist government, again early in her political career.
33:38
Speaker 1: Things have changed drastically since then. She's now a protector
33:41
Speaker 1: and a defender of China when it comes to legislation.
33:46
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter what's coming out of her mouth. She's now
33:50
Speaker 1: even protecting China from American athletes, telling American athletes to
33:53
Speaker 1: basically shut up and say nothing now. She raised eyebrows
33:58
Speaker 1: when she had this to say to the American athletes
34:01
Speaker 1: in China just a few days ago. Make no mistake,
34:06
Speaker 1: our athletes should participate. They've trained, their discipline, they've dreamed,
34:11
Speaker 1: they've aspired, they've worked hard. But this year we must
34:15
Speaker 1: celebrate them from home as they compete in China. I
34:21
Speaker 1: would say to our athletes, you're there to compete, do
34:29
Speaker 1: not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government because
34:34
Speaker 1: they are ruthless. I know there is a temptation on
34:37
Speaker 1: the part of some to speak out while they are there.
34:41
Speaker 1: I respect that, but I also worry about what the
34:46
Speaker 1: Chinese government might do to their reputations, to them families.
34:52
Speaker 1: That was a warning from the Speaker of the House
34:56
Speaker 1: the United States of America to athletes, do not speak out.
35:00
Speaker 1: Do not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government
35:03
Speaker 1: because they are ruthless. Now, if this is true, when
35:06
Speaker 1: you can't keep American athletes safe, why are you sending
35:09
Speaker 1: them to China? Or could it be that she's got
35:12
Speaker 1: a back channel deal going on with China and she
35:14
Speaker 1: just said, Hey, I got this. I'll tell American athletes
35:17
Speaker 1: to shut up on American official I'm one of the
35:20
Speaker 1: top people in our government. I'll say that to them.
35:23
Speaker 1: You won't have to worry as much about American athletes
35:25
Speaker 1: speaking out. I'll make them fear you China, and we'll
35:28
Speaker 1: go back to making money. When you hear something like
35:32
Speaker 1: this and the Speak of the House, you need to
35:34
Speaker 1: go back and follow the money which has direct ties
35:39
Speaker 1: to exactly what's going on with a corruption with Hunter
35:42
Speaker 1: Biden and Joe Biden. Now, let me give you a
35:44
Speaker 1: little bit more history of Nancy Pelosi, so you understand
35:49
Speaker 1: just how corrupt China is in buying off people like
35:54
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden to put influence on people like Joe Biden.
35:58
Speaker 1: We know about the famous flight to China, we know
36:01
Speaker 1: about the billion dollars in loans from China, we know
36:04
Speaker 1: about the money flowing into the Biden family. And I'll
36:07
Speaker 1: dissect even more than a moment, but the same thing
36:10
Speaker 1: that they've done with Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, they've
36:12
Speaker 1: now done with Nancy Pelosi's family. Pelosi has now been
36:19
Speaker 1: accused of being coopted by China due to her husband's finances.
36:28
Speaker 1: That's right. On Monday's broadcast of Fox News Radio's Guy
36:34
Speaker 1: Benson Show, Representative Michael Walt's, a Republican from Florida, stated
36:39
Speaker 1: that how Speaker Nancy Pelosi soften softened on China about
36:43
Speaker 1: the time that her husband became heavily involved financially in
36:47
Speaker 1: Chinese investments and in Chinese firms. This is exactly what
36:53
Speaker 1: China did to compromise Joe Biden. They used his son
36:57
Speaker 1: and his brother, got in their tentacles into the family,
37:01
Speaker 1: had the money flowing so that the family would make
37:06
Speaker 1: sure that their elected officials in the family would have
37:10
Speaker 1: positive moves and positive influence over China. The congressman went
37:16
Speaker 1: on to say, and this is an example of how
37:18
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party co opts people. Speaker Pelosi urging
37:24
Speaker 1: American athletes to not speak out in Beijing, not to
37:26
Speaker 1: talk about human rights is shocking because she said it
37:31
Speaker 1: would be potentially dangerous for them for their physical safety,
37:34
Speaker 1: for the safety of their families if they did so.
37:39
Speaker 1: When you hear the Speaker of the House saying that
37:41
Speaker 1: you better worry about your family's safety to an athlete
37:44
Speaker 1: if you speak out, I want you to think about
37:47
Speaker 1: whose side she's on. Does that sound like she's on
37:51
Speaker 1: the side of American athletes. No? Does that sound like
37:54
Speaker 1: she's on the side of the American people. Absolutely not.
37:57
Speaker 1: She's literally doing the bidding, the warfare, the mental warfare
38:02
Speaker 1: of the Chinese Communist government. What do you think, What
38:06
Speaker 1: do you make of that guidance from the Speaker of
38:08
Speaker 1: the House. And isn't that basically a case for why
38:13
Speaker 1: the United States should not have our fingerprints on these
38:16
Speaker 1: games at all? If that's what she actually believes was
38:21
Speaker 1: the question asked the congressman. His response no, it completely is.
38:25
Speaker 1: But yet she wouldn't support my bill calling for a
38:28
Speaker 1: boycott of the Olympics, nor would she support my bill saying,
38:32
Speaker 1: you know what, if you're going to sell products made
38:34
Speaker 1: with modern day slave labor that we know is also
38:38
Speaker 1: building the Chinese building up the Chinese military, then you
38:43
Speaker 1: shouldn't be able to sell to the Defense Department. None
38:47
Speaker 1: of those things she would support. Now, I want you
38:49
Speaker 1: to think about this bill real quick. He put this
38:52
Speaker 1: congressman put together a piece of legislation that says, if
38:56
Speaker 1: you're a company in China, are you're a company in
38:59
Speaker 1: general that's building the Chinese military, then you should not
39:02
Speaker 1: be able to procure a contract and get paid billions
39:05
Speaker 1: and billions of dollars from the Defense Department. Nancy Pelosi
39:09
Speaker 1: would not support that bill. If you are arming our enemy,
39:14
Speaker 1: we're not going to allow you to have contracts the
39:16
Speaker 1: United States government, the United States military. That's a simple
39:18
Speaker 1: bill that should be bipartisan, and Nancy Pelosi wouldn't even
39:22
Speaker 1: allow it to come for a vote. She blocked the bill.
39:26
Speaker 1: None of those things she would support. And the thing
39:29
Speaker 1: is she's always been pretty tough historically about Tibet. She
39:33
Speaker 1: met with a Dalai lama for example, she was tough,
39:37
Speaker 1: but she switched a few years ago. And coincidentally, it
39:41
Speaker 1: was about the time that her husband became heavily involved
39:44
Speaker 1: financially in Chinese investments and in Chinese firms. And look, guy,
39:50
Speaker 1: this is how the Chinese Communist Party operates. They co
39:55
Speaker 1: opt people. Now you look at Nancy Pelosi and how
40:06
Speaker 1: Speaker Pelosi is not warning the Chinese not screw the
40:09
Speaker 1: American athletes. She's warning American athletes to shut up on
40:13
Speaker 1: behalf of the Chinese government. It is very clear the
40:20
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi has been compromised. Compromises the only word I
40:25
Speaker 1: know to explain this. It's compromised. She is capitulating to
40:33
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party intimidation and censorship and even telling
40:37
Speaker 1: the athletes there's a good chance that your family could
40:42
Speaker 1: be harmed by China if you criticize, why is an
40:48
Speaker 1: American elected official at the top of our government saying
40:54
Speaker 1: and doing this. Speaker of the House Pelosi was once
40:59
Speaker 1: a hardcore activist critic of the Chinese Communist Party. How
41:04
Speaker 1: did she go from being that to changing her tune
41:09
Speaker 1: and now being best friends to Beijing? One simple thing change.
41:13
Speaker 1: Her family was getting rich. That's what happened. Pelosi's stance
41:19
Speaker 1: changed most rapidly during the debate over the two thousand
41:23
Speaker 1: and eight Beijing Summer Olympics, an event human rights activistic
41:26
Speaker 1: cried as a travesty given China's extensive record of atrocities
41:30
Speaker 1: against its own people. Opponents of those Olympic Games in
41:34
Speaker 1: Oa argued at the time that granting China such a
41:38
Speaker 1: tremendous honor and showcase for the Communist Party would embolden
41:42
Speaker 1: it to commit even greater human rights atrocities horrors against people.
41:49
Speaker 1: A year later, China sent parliamentary troops to crush a
41:53
Speaker 1: peaceful protest by members of the Yugur community, killing dozens
41:59
Speaker 1: and setting in motion the events that would lead to
42:02
Speaker 1: the dictator currently presiding over concentration camps that at their
42:07
Speaker 1: peak were estimated to imprison as many as three million people.
42:13
Speaker 1: Early in her career in Congress, Pelosi was one of
42:15
Speaker 1: the most vocal anti Beijing voices in Washington. Pelosi so
42:21
Speaker 1: opposed the Communist Party that she protests against the Tineman
42:24
Speaker 1: Square masker in Tineman Square in nineteen ninety one, she
42:30
Speaker 1: was a junior member of Congress, Pelosi found herself in
42:34
Speaker 1: Tieneman Square. She was part of a congressional delegation visiting
42:37
Speaker 1: Beising barely two years after the horrific events had unfolded.
42:42
Speaker 1: Pelosi covertly carried a banner into the middle of the
42:45
Speaker 1: square and unfolded it in front of a small crowd
42:48
Speaker 1: and the media. To those who died for democracy in China,
42:53
Speaker 1: it read Pelosi actually fought against Most Favored Nation trade
42:59
Speaker 1: status for China and bringing Beijing into the World Trade
43:03
Speaker 1: Organization as well. She said no. Then one thing changed
43:10
Speaker 1: all of this. A guy by the name of Paul Pelosi.
43:16
Speaker 1: Paul Pelosi clearly had been watching and learning from Joe Biden.
43:21
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's brother was the bagman for the family business.
43:27
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's brother set up the crime family. In my opinion,
43:32
Speaker 1: long before Hunter Biden got involved. Hunter Biden is just
43:37
Speaker 1: the second coming of the crime syndicate. Hunter Biden is
43:43
Speaker 1: two point zero the second generation of the family business. Well,
43:47
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi, started getting business ties in China,
43:53
Speaker 1: which is exactly what the Chinese Communist Party does. They
43:55
Speaker 1: get their tentacles into you. They compromise you, and then
43:58
Speaker 1: they feed you cash, and and you influence your family members,
44:02
Speaker 1: whether it's Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden, to do what
44:07
Speaker 1: they want you to do. It's called bribery. Pelosi's human
44:12
Speaker 1: rights advocacy disappeared. Husband Paul became a partner and investor
44:19
Speaker 1: in Matthew International Capital Management, a pioneer quote unquote in
44:23
Speaker 1: the Chinese investment market. He also invested in several other
44:27
Speaker 1: companies who succeed in drumming up business in a big
44:34
Speaker 1: way with you guess it, the Chinese Communist Party. In fact,
44:39
Speaker 1: the entire success of Matthew's International Capital Management, where her
44:45
Speaker 1: husband and suppose his husband Paul would become a partner
44:48
Speaker 1: it totally. They say, actually their success or failure depends
44:55
Speaker 1: on how much business they have with the Chinese Communist Party.
45:00
Speaker 1: In other words, if they're not doing business with a
45:02
Speaker 1: Chinese Comist Party, they will go bankrupt. Paul Pelosi's classmate
45:07
Speaker 1: from Georgetown, Vincent Wolfington, set up a limousine service called
45:13
Speaker 1: Global Ambassador Concierge, which catered to ultra high net worth
45:19
Speaker 1: individuals traveling around the world. One big market for Global
45:23
Speaker 1: the Beijing two thousand and eight Summer Olympics, which Nancy
45:30
Speaker 1: Pelosi said okay in Congress. What did Pelosi do the
45:35
Speaker 1: same exact stuff. This is almost to a tea of
45:39
Speaker 1: what Hunter and Joe Biden have done and Hunter Biden's uncle,
45:42
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's brother. Pelosi had initially been critical of China
45:47
Speaker 1: hosting the Games, arguing that it's human rights record should
45:50
Speaker 1: quote prevent it from such an honor. The year after
45:54
Speaker 1: her husband bought shares in Global Ambassador Concierge, she revealed
46:00
Speaker 1: verse course and opposed a boycott of Beijing hosting the Games.
46:06
Speaker 1: Two years later, Pelosi held between five million and twenty
46:09
Speaker 1: five million in a Matthew's fund specializing in Asian investments.
46:17
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi's husband received partnership income between a hundred thousand
46:21
Speaker 1: to a million dollars. That's not all Pelosi. Every time
46:29
Speaker 1: there's a games in China is making money. So when
46:35
Speaker 1: Pelosi faced the same situation after the O eight Games
46:40
Speaker 1: and decided in twenty twenty two, what was she going
46:43
Speaker 1: to do? You guessed it. She attacked our athletes and
46:47
Speaker 1: told them to shut up. Now, there was a session
46:50
Speaker 1: of the Olympic Games in Beijing, opposed by a large
46:53
Speaker 1: contingency of human rights activists who feared that China's repression
46:59
Speaker 1: may increase even further after two weeks of global praise
47:04
Speaker 1: from the world. Unlike last time, the eight Summer Games
47:08
Speaker 1: proceeded with heightened problems for any of the minorities because
47:15
Speaker 1: China realize the world was not watching. Pelosi has opposed
47:21
Speaker 1: calls for a boycott of the twenty twenty two Beijing
47:24
Speaker 1: win our Olympics, saying we must support and celebrate our athletes.
47:30
Speaker 1: She hasn't said supported a diplomatic boycott of the event,
47:34
Speaker 1: which is worthless. A diplomatic boycott, to be clear, as
47:38
Speaker 1: not a boycott, as diplomats do not compete in the
47:41
Speaker 1: Olympic Games, meaning it's a meaningless, worthless message that you're sending.
47:50
Speaker 1: As one united international community, we have the opportunity and
47:54
Speaker 1: responsibility to whole Beijing to account and to stand up
47:57
Speaker 1: for the human dignity and freedom in the region around
48:00
Speaker 1: the world, Pelosi said in a statement after the administration
48:03
Speaker 1: of President Joe Biden announced the diplomatic boycott of the
48:05
Speaker 1: twenty twenty two Olympics shortly before the games. Pelosi warned
48:09
Speaker 1: athletes you better shut up. You better not behave like
48:14
Speaker 1: I did in Tienamen Square. You better keep your criticism
48:17
Speaker 1: of the regime to yourselves, because otherwise your families could
48:20
Speaker 1: be at risk, literally threatening the athletes on behalf of China.
48:23
Speaker 1: If you think about it again, Nancy Pelosi's own words
48:29
Speaker 1: to the athletes, She's very clear. She's speaking on behalf
48:33
Speaker 1: of China, and she's trying to put fear into the
48:38
Speaker 1: athletes from the United States of America so that they
48:42
Speaker 1: will comply with China's demands. Make no mistake, our athletes
48:47
Speaker 1: should participate. They've trained, their discipline, they've dreamed, they've aspired,
48:52
Speaker 1: they've worked hard. But this year we must celebrate them
48:56
Speaker 1: from home as they compete in China. I would say
49:02
Speaker 1: to our athletes, you're there to compete, do not risk
49:11
Speaker 1: incurring the anger of the Chinese government because they are ruthless.
49:16
Speaker 1: I know there is a temptation on the part of
49:18
Speaker 1: some to speak out while they are there. I respect that,
49:23
Speaker 1: but I also worry about what the Chinese government might do,
49:29
Speaker 1: What the Chinese government might do to their reputations to
49:34
Speaker 1: them families, Your families will not be safe. Your families
49:38
Speaker 1: may not be safe do you want to be halfway
49:41
Speaker 1: around the world and then your families be attacked by spies,
49:46
Speaker 1: Chinese spies in America. It's up to you, folks. Think
49:50
Speaker 1: about what you're doing now, think about what's happening. Shut
49:55
Speaker 1: up and play. I know that's not what I did
49:57
Speaker 1: in tim and Square, but I'm telling you, we can't
50:00
Speaker 1: keep you safe in China, so you better listen to me.
50:05
Speaker 1: This whole strategy by government officials in America, whether it's
50:10
Speaker 1: Joe Biden or Nancy Pelosi, is very clear. Shut up,
50:16
Speaker 1: get in line, because we're making money. Shut up and play.
50:21
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi she did the complete opposite of that Antianamen Square.
50:27
Speaker 1: You keep quiet, is what she's telling the athletes. She's
50:33
Speaker 1: telling the athletes, we can't keep you safe in China,
50:35
Speaker 1: so you better listen to me. Shows you how compromised
50:40
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi is. It also shows you how compromised Joe
50:46
Speaker 1: Biden is, which goes back to one of the main
50:50
Speaker 1: spy strategies coming from China. China's main strategy with the
50:56
Speaker 1: US government is not to spy on them. It's to
50:59
Speaker 1: capture elites with connections to the US government. Buying off
51:06
Speaker 1: elites like the Bidens and the Pelosi's. That's what they do.
51:12
Speaker 1: In Peter Schweitzer's new book, he talks about this, saying
51:15
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party's main strategy is to win. To
51:20
Speaker 1: win involves buying off the elites of the United States government.
51:23
Speaker 1: The process they call elite capture. They have a name
51:27
Speaker 1: for it, elite capture. And they have captured Hunter Biden.
51:30
Speaker 1: They have captured Hunter Biden's uncle, Joe Biden's brother. They
51:34
Speaker 1: have captured Nancy Pelosi's husband and Nancy Pelosi's son. That's
51:41
Speaker 1: what they have done. They have a name for it
51:43
Speaker 1: called elite capture. They do it all over the world.
51:47
Speaker 1: You go into a country where you need something, whether
51:50
Speaker 1: it's Afghanistan or somewhere else, and you capture elites and
51:54
Speaker 1: you feed them a little bit of cash to make
51:56
Speaker 1: yourselves billions and billions of dollars. China identified the Biden
52:01
Speaker 1: family is one of the primary targets, and it worked.
52:07
Speaker 1: The president of the Government Accountability Institute explained the broad
52:11
Speaker 1: theme in his latest best selling book during a time
52:16
Speaker 1: when everyone, I would say needs to read this. The
52:20
Speaker 1: subtitle of the book is how American elites get rich
52:22
Speaker 1: helping China win and this reflects a strategy that Beijing
52:27
Speaker 1: has had. They're pretty open about it, where the strategy
52:30
Speaker 1: is simply to buy off the elites of the United
52:32
Speaker 1: States and other countries. China views itself as in competition
52:38
Speaker 1: with the United States of America. It believes it can
52:40
Speaker 1: win by buying off the elites that pennies on the
52:43
Speaker 1: dollar fractions of a penny on the dollar compared to
52:46
Speaker 1: actually competing with America. They're not actually competing with the
52:50
Speaker 1: US economy and culture. They're just buying it off. In
52:54
Speaker 1: other words, they view themselves as in the competition with
52:58
Speaker 1: the United States America, and this is the best way
53:00
Speaker 1: and the cheapest way to win. When there's a competition
53:03
Speaker 1: between these two countries, they want to win it and
53:06
Speaker 1: they are They're quite open about that. Presidency has been
53:09
Speaker 1: talking about it since twenty twelve. And they decide the
53:12
Speaker 1: way that they can win and do it on the
53:15
Speaker 1: cheapest way possible. Instead of going toe to toe with
53:19
Speaker 1: an economy and a culture, the way they can win
53:22
Speaker 1: is just by buying off those at the top of
53:24
Speaker 1: the government. It's a spycraft called elite capture. It's the
53:29
Speaker 1: term they use. They're not looking for, you know, leaders
53:34
Speaker 1: to be clones. There's a strategic concept they use to
53:40
Speaker 1: loosely translate means, and the loosely translated mean big help
53:44
Speaker 1: with a little bad mouth. That's what they decide they're
53:49
Speaker 1: going to call it. And what that basically means is
53:53
Speaker 1: if somebody says occasionally thinks about the ugers or about
53:57
Speaker 1: human rights, they may get irritated about it, but that's
54:00
Speaker 1: not a big deal. What they want the elites to
54:03
Speaker 1: do is ensure that they get access to Western capital
54:07
Speaker 1: and they get access to Western technology as long as
54:11
Speaker 1: the elected officials and corporate executives don't interfere on that.
54:16
Speaker 1: They're very happy to help these elites get rich because
54:19
Speaker 1: they're helping them in such an important way. Now you
54:22
Speaker 1: think about what Nancy Pelosi said, Let's just go back
54:25
Speaker 1: to that for a moment. Think about what the White
54:27
Speaker 1: House has said. Right, they've kind of slapped their risks
54:30
Speaker 1: with human rights, and they've said be fearful of China,
54:33
Speaker 1: don't trust the Chinese, so don't say anything about them. Right,
54:36
Speaker 1: they're doing their bidding for them. They're saying negative things
54:39
Speaker 1: about China that don't really matter because ultimately China's getting
54:43
Speaker 1: what they want, which is a broader silence from the
54:45
Speaker 1: athletes of the Olympic Games. In other words, when it's
54:49
Speaker 1: crunched time. The idea is these elites side with China.
54:54
Speaker 1: That's their strategy. They want access to the Western markets,
54:58
Speaker 1: they want access to money, they want access to research.
55:02
Speaker 1: And one of the most successful targets of the Chinese
55:04
Speaker 1: Communist Party strategy is the Biden family. How do we
55:09
Speaker 1: know this because they paid now thirty one million dollars
55:13
Speaker 1: in deals from individuals with ties to Chinese intelligence. Now
55:17
Speaker 1: let me be clear about this. Part three is going
55:20
Speaker 1: to be about the money to the Biden family. In
55:23
Speaker 1: our expose, the Biden family has now commercial ties in China.
55:30
Speaker 1: They realized they could easily corrupt Hunter Biden because of
55:35
Speaker 1: the hookers and the drugs and everything else. It was
55:38
Speaker 1: an easy target. They realized that Hunter Biden couldn't do
55:44
Speaker 1: any business without trading on his father's name, So what
55:47
Speaker 1: do they do? They started trading with him. They understood
55:51
Speaker 1: the cronyism of his brother as well, and Hunter Biden's
55:56
Speaker 1: laptop and access to the emails made it very clear
56:00
Speaker 1: and easy to piece together how much they got and
56:03
Speaker 1: perhaps more importantly, who made the deals happen? Now the
56:08
Speaker 1: question that you should all be asking yourself. Peter Schweitzer
56:11
Speaker 1: said his quote, who really made it rain for the
56:13
Speaker 1: Bidens in China? Hunter Biden was eager for deals and
56:16
Speaker 1: went over an O nine in twenty ten after his
56:19
Speaker 1: father became vice president. There were a handful of Chinese
56:23
Speaker 1: businessmen that made it rain for Hunter, including a mysterious
56:29
Speaker 1: businessman who arrangs a twenty million dollars deal for Hunter
56:32
Speaker 1: Biden out of thin air. At the time, that man
56:35
Speaker 1: Fang was also business partners with a vice minister for
56:38
Speaker 1: State security in China, which is their spy agencies, the
56:42
Speaker 1: equivalent of our CIA. The vice minister's responsibility was foreign
56:48
Speaker 1: intelligence recruitment at the time. So you got a guy
56:54
Speaker 1: named Chief Fang, a mysterious quote businessman who gives Hunter
56:59
Speaker 1: Biden twenty million dollars. This is a fact, and Fang
57:04
Speaker 1: is a business partner with a vice minister of the
57:07
Speaker 1: equivalent of the CIA in China, and that vicemanor's sole
57:11
Speaker 1: responsibility was foreign intelligence recruitment. That should have set off
57:17
Speaker 1: a lot of alarm bells right away in this country,
57:21
Speaker 1: but it didn't, Or maybe it did, and people just
57:23
Speaker 1: decided to look the other way because the vice president
57:25
Speaker 1: of the United States of America, another businessman, by the way,
57:29
Speaker 1: that helped with that twenty million dollar deal, and wired
57:33
Speaker 1: another five million to a separate Hunter Biden business was
57:39
Speaker 1: business partners, specifically with a daughter of the former Minister
57:44
Speaker 1: of State Security who ran the entire spy apparatus. Now
57:49
Speaker 1: you have to be an idiot to believe that this
57:52
Speaker 1: wasn't all perfectly set up by the Chinese Communist Party
57:55
Speaker 1: in their spy agency. You got a guy that's got
57:58
Speaker 1: a drug problem. You got a guy that's got a
58:01
Speaker 1: hooker problem. You got a guy that's got a lot
58:04
Speaker 1: of issues in Hunter Biden. His dad happens to be
58:07
Speaker 1: the Vice President. At the time, you're flying over on
58:11
Speaker 1: Air Force two. You're trying to get away from the
58:14
Speaker 1: Secret Service, not wanting them to come to any of
58:16
Speaker 1: your meetings. There's no records of these things, and you're
58:19
Speaker 1: flying back home with twenty million cash another five Now,
58:22
Speaker 1: I want you think about how much money twenty million
58:24
Speaker 1: dollars is to an individual like Hunter Biden. It is
58:27
Speaker 1: the holy grail. I want you to think about how
58:31
Speaker 1: little money that is for the Chinese Communist Party, when
58:34
Speaker 1: you're getting access to the Vice president Knite States of
58:36
Speaker 1: America and quite possibly blackmailing and compromising his own family members,
58:42
Speaker 1: including his own brother. I want you to think about
58:45
Speaker 1: what that's worth for a spy agency who is spending
58:50
Speaker 1: hundreds of billions of dollars and all of a sudden,
58:53
Speaker 1: right in front of you got a crack addict who
58:56
Speaker 1: is sitting there begging you for cash, and it only
58:59
Speaker 1: costs twenty million dollars another five million dollar deal to
59:04
Speaker 1: basically completely own you. I go back to what they
59:08
Speaker 1: called it, elite capture. That's what it costs them. It's
59:14
Speaker 1: crystal clear. They made it abundantly clear that they could
59:19
Speaker 1: capture the son of Joe Biden, and Joe Biden wasn't
59:23
Speaker 1: gonna stop it, and he was gonna play game. And
59:27
Speaker 1: what happened, Joe Biden changed his tune towards China. That's
59:33
Speaker 1: a fact. I want you to imagine one last thing,
59:37
Speaker 1: and again part three. Tomorrow, we're gonna deal with the
59:41
Speaker 1: money and how much money they've actually gotten the Biden family.
59:47
Speaker 1: But I want you to imagine the Cold War days
59:50
Speaker 1: if an American first family was doing deals with Russia.
59:55
Speaker 1: I want you to imagine if Reagan's son would have
1:00:00
Speaker 1: gotten thirty one million dollars from a random Russian businessman
1:00:03
Speaker 1: who had direct linkage to the KGB, there would have
1:00:08
Speaker 1: been alarm bells clinging all over DC and it would
1:00:11
Speaker 1: have never been allowed to happen because our government would
1:00:15
Speaker 1: have realized just how damning that could be. How come
1:00:19
Speaker 1: that didn't happen in two thousand and nine and twenty ten.
1:00:24
Speaker 1: It's because our government is being sold out by the
1:00:27
Speaker 1: elites that have been captured by China and the money.
1:00:33
Speaker 1: In Part three, you are gonna want to hear this
1:00:37
Speaker 1: because it is even more shocking than I could have imagined.
1:00:42
Speaker 1: If you missed any of Part one, which has gone
1:00:45
Speaker 1: viral on the podcast networks, grab it, Grab part one,
1:00:51
Speaker 1: listen to it. It's up on the Ben Ferguson podcasts.
1:00:54
Speaker 1: All right. Part three tomorrow will be all about the
1:00:57
Speaker 1: money that hunter By has gotten for the family. You're
1:01:02
Speaker 1: not gonna want to miss that as well. Make sure
1:01:05
Speaker 1: you share our podcast with your family and friends, other
1:01:09
Speaker 1: people that you want them to know this information. Please
1:01:12
Speaker 1: share it