Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Declassified Docs Show Hillary PERSONALLY Approved Russia Hoax-Complicit w the FBI-to Distract from Her Email Scandal, plus Dems Abandon Israel & Harvard in bed with CCP

Transcript

Declassified Docs Show Hillary PERSONALLY Approved Russia Hoax-Complicit w the FBI-to Distract from Her Email Scandal, plus Dems Abandon Israel & Harvard in bed with CCP · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: Welcome.
0:01
Speaker 2: It is a verdict with Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with you,
0:04
Speaker 2: and it's really nice to have you with us wherever
0:06
Speaker 2: you are around the country. We've got a lot to
0:09
Speaker 2: unpack on this show, Senator, including a new smoking gun.
0:14
Speaker 2: The Russian hoax exposed even more, and we're being told
0:18
Speaker 2: now that Hillary Clinton apparently greenlit the entire idea to
0:24
Speaker 2: hide her email scandal, and declassified documents are now showing
0:29
Speaker 2: exactly that well.
0:31
Speaker 3: Newly de classified documents show, as you noted, that Hillary
0:34
Speaker 3: Clinton personally approved the Russia hoax and she did it
0:39
Speaker 3: to distract from her own email scandal. She did it
0:42
Speaker 3: with the complicity of the corporate media, and she did
0:45
Speaker 3: it with the complicity of the FBI. These emails are
0:49
Speaker 3: bombshell emails that show that George Soros and his foundation
0:53
Speaker 3: was intimately involved in the entire operation and that this
0:58
Speaker 3: was a lie from day one, and the political operators,
1:02
Speaker 3: including Hillary Rodham Clinton, knew fully well that it was
1:06
Speaker 3: a lie. On top of that, we had a vote
1:08
Speaker 3: this week on Israel, and I will tell you every
1:11
Speaker 3: day every week, the Democrats abandoning of the state of
1:15
Speaker 3: Israel gets worse and worse and worse. This week, more
1:19
Speaker 3: than half of the Senate Democrats voted to cut off
1:21
Speaker 3: military funding for Israel. The degree to which today's Democrats
1:25
Speaker 3: have been captured by the pro Hamas radical left wing
1:28
Speaker 3: of their party continues to get worse, and it is
1:31
Speaker 3: dismaying and sadly they were echoed by the governments of
1:35
Speaker 3: Great Britain and France and Canada all this week. The
1:39
Speaker 3: left has decided Hamas, they stand for Hamas, and they're
1:43
Speaker 3: no longer willing to stand with Israel. And finally, a
1:47
Speaker 3: new story about Harvard's tie ties to the Chinese Communist Party,
1:52
Speaker 3: their explicit partnership with a major organ of the Chinese
1:55
Speaker 3: Communist Party to train the leaders of China. The leaders
1:59
Speaker 3: that are involved in horrific human rights abuses, the leaders
2:03
Speaker 3: that are involved in the tyranny of the Chinese government
2:06
Speaker 3: are more and more Harvard trained. We're gonna lay out
2:08
Speaker 3: the evidence for that.
2:10
Speaker 2: Yeah, it really is incredible. It's a lot to unpack
2:12
Speaker 2: on today's show. All right, I want to take a
2:14
Speaker 2: moment and talk to you about an awesome way to
2:16
Speaker 2: start your day, and I'm going to save you a
2:18
Speaker 2: bunch of money. At the same time, If you start
2:21
Speaker 2: your day with coffee, then you've got to try Krocket Coffee.
2:25
Speaker 2: It is roasted perfection in small batches on purpose by
2:29
Speaker 2: experts who love the taste of an outstanding cup of coffee.
2:34
Speaker 2: It's also roasted in our nation's heartland and delivered fresh
2:37
Speaker 2: to your home. You're going to feel like a real
2:40
Speaker 2: Western settler drinking coffee over a morning campfire. It is
2:44
Speaker 2: just that good. The aroma of Krocket coffee as it
2:47
Speaker 2: brews in your home, It's like something you've probably never
2:51
Speaker 2: experienced before at home or in your office. Now, I
2:54
Speaker 2: want to save you some money. You can choose by
2:56
Speaker 2: the way between fresh ground coffee, whole being coffee.
3:00
Speaker 1: Or K cups, whatever you choose.
3:02
Speaker 2: And if you're interested in mushroom coffee and the positive
3:05
Speaker 2: benefits that come with enjoying that each day, Crocket Coffee
3:08
Speaker 2: is now producing that as well. There's dark roast, mild roast,
3:12
Speaker 2: a light roast, a decaf version, and the mushroom organic blend.
3:15
Speaker 2: You choose what you want to try, and I'm gonna
3:18
Speaker 2: get you a discount to try it now. Go online
3:21
Speaker 2: to Crockettcoffee dot com. Use my name Ben. You're gonna
3:25
Speaker 2: get twenty percent off your first order, and then you're
3:28
Speaker 2: gonna be hooked just like me, and you're gonna drink
3:30
Speaker 2: it every day and you're gonna be like, why didn't
3:32
Speaker 2: I try this sooner? Crocketcoffee dot Com use my name
3:35
Speaker 2: Ben as your promo code. You're gonna get twenty percent off.
3:37
Speaker 2: Now here's something else. I love my good friends Klay
3:40
Speaker 2: Travis and Buck Stexon. They started this company and they
3:43
Speaker 2: do something.
3:44
Speaker 1: It's amazing.
3:45
Speaker 2: A portion of every purchase goes to Sport Tunnel to
3:48
Speaker 2: Towers Foundation because the good people at Crockett Coffee also
3:53
Speaker 2: pledged to never forget. So go to Crockett Coffee dot com.
3:57
Speaker 2: Use my name benage your promo code, get twenty percent
3:59
Speaker 2: off your first order. All right, So, Centater, where were
4:02
Speaker 2: you when you found out the Russian hoax is now
4:05
Speaker 2: being exposed? And what was your initial reaction to Hillary
4:09
Speaker 2: Clinton greenline this? It's like for me, I was like, Yep,
4:11
Speaker 2: that makes sense, Yep, that adds up, Yep, that matches.
4:14
Speaker 1: Yeah.
4:14
Speaker 3: Look, the evidence has been coming over the last several weeks,
4:17
Speaker 3: so Telsea Gabbard released significant evidence that the intelligence community
4:21
Speaker 3: had been telling Barack Obama and the Obama administration that
4:26
Speaker 3: Russia was not trying to hack the election. They'd been
4:28
Speaker 3: doing that for months. We covered that on a previous pod.
4:30
Speaker 3: And then this week the portions of the classified annex
4:35
Speaker 3: of John Durham's Special Council investigation were released, and they
4:39
Speaker 3: were released by my colleague Chuck Grassley, who was the
4:41
Speaker 3: chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and I got to say,
4:45
Speaker 3: it is stunning what is in these new lead to
4:49
Speaker 3: classified documents. So they reveal quote confidential conversations between members
4:57
Speaker 3: of the Democratic National Committee and Georgie Soros's Open Society
5:01
Speaker 3: Foundation that occurred before the twenty sixteen election, and in particular,
5:08
Speaker 3: accorded to the declassified files, Hillary Clinton personally approved a
5:13
Speaker 3: plan that had been proposed by her foreign policy advisor,
5:16
Speaker 3: woman named Julianne Smith, to quote smear Donald Trump by
5:21
Speaker 3: magnifying the scandal tied to the intrusion by the Russian
5:25
Speaker 3: Special Services in the pre election process to benefit the
5:28
Speaker 3: Republican candidate. And by the way, Julianne Smith was later
5:32
Speaker 3: appointed to serve as ambassador to NATO under President Joe Biden.
5:36
Speaker 3: So it turned out this was this was a profitable
5:40
Speaker 3: role for her to be involved in this massive hoax.
5:44
Speaker 3: There's an email in particular that is that is really remarkable.
5:47
Speaker 3: It was written by Open Society Foundation's senior vice president,
5:51
Speaker 3: a fellow named Leonard Bernardo, and it was dated July
5:55
Speaker 3: twenty seventh, twenty sixteen. And here's what it says. Quote
5:59
Speaker 3: hr R CHRC stands for Hillary Rodin. Clinton approved Julia's
6:04
Speaker 3: idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering US elections. This
6:09
Speaker 3: is in July of twenty sixteen. That should distract people
6:13
Speaker 3: from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes
6:19
Speaker 3: to the Olympic level. And his email continues quote the
6:24
Speaker 3: point is making the Russian play a US domestic issue
6:29
Speaker 3: in absence of direct evidence. CrowdStrike and Threat Connect will
6:36
Speaker 3: supply the media, and GRU which is the foreign intelligence
6:41
Speaker 3: arm of Russia, will hopefully carry on to give more facts.
6:49
Speaker 3: And Oka, I gotta say, this is Hillary explicitly signing
6:54
Speaker 3: on and counting on, counting on the assistance. And then
7:00
Speaker 3: he goes on to say he says that the Clinton
7:07
Speaker 3: campaign's plan included quote raising the theme of Putin's support
7:12
Speaker 3: for Trump and pushing public opinion to quote equote the
7:17
Speaker 3: Russian leader's influence campaign with actual election infrastructure hacking, and
7:23
Speaker 3: it involved distributing quote the necessary information through the FBI
7:29
Speaker 3: affiliated technical structures, in particular the crowd strike and threat
7:33
Speaker 3: Connect companies, from where the information would then be disseminated
7:38
Speaker 3: through leading leading US opinion of publications. And that's another
7:42
Speaker 3: email from Bernardo. And then the email predicts and this
7:47
Speaker 3: is stunning that the FBI would quote put more oil
7:54
Speaker 3: into the fire of the Russia collusion narrative. This was
7:59
Speaker 3: an explicit plan by the Hillary Clinton campaign and by
8:04
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton herself to use the FBI to spread a
8:08
Speaker 3: lie about Donald Trump. And it was in order to
8:11
Speaker 3: try to win the election. And thank god, the American
8:13
Speaker 3: people were not deceived and they elected Donald Trump over
8:17
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton.
8:18
Speaker 2: When it went to the FBI, how they categorized at
8:21
Speaker 2: the time the dossier and everything else. It was paid
8:24
Speaker 2: for by Hillary Clinton, partially her campaign and then the
8:27
Speaker 2: Democratic National Committee. They created it out of thin air,
8:31
Speaker 2: and then they went to the FBI. And even the
8:35
Speaker 2: FBI had classified, if I remember correctly, as quote user
8:38
Speaker 2: generated and even offered. I think it was like a
8:42
Speaker 2: million dollars to steal if he could verify any of
8:46
Speaker 2: this dossier, which he never got paid on because he
8:48
Speaker 2: couldn't do it well.
8:50
Speaker 3: The Steele dossier was designed to be a lie, and
8:53
Speaker 3: it was straight out opposition research. It was paid for
8:55
Speaker 3: by the Hillary Clinton campaign. It was paid for by
8:58
Speaker 3: the DNC. They paid over a million dollars and and
9:01
Speaker 3: and they hid the fees, uh that they they hid
9:04
Speaker 3: them as quote legal fees to their law firms, Perkins cooy.
9:09
Speaker 1: Uh.
9:09
Speaker 3: They had five point six million in legal fees that
9:11
Speaker 3: were paid in one bill and they they hid that
9:14
Speaker 3: amount in there. And and once they created the Steele
9:18
Speaker 3: dossier that just made blatant lies about Donald Trump, Uh,
9:22
Speaker 3: they then gave it to the FBI, and and and
9:25
Speaker 3: Obama DOJ and FBI officials were active in covering up
9:30
Speaker 3: that this came from the Hillary Clinton campaign. And understand
9:32
Speaker 3: this is during the presidential campaign, this is while the
9:35
Speaker 3: campaign is in full speed. This this false oppo research document.
9:41
Speaker 3: It was just concocted. It was just created out of
9:43
Speaker 3: whole cloth. It became the basis for for then an
9:47
Speaker 3: FBI investigation, and and that FBI investigation was then uh
9:53
Speaker 3: eagerly leaked uh to the press, and the press breathlessly
9:57
Speaker 3: reported on it. And the fact that the FBI would
10:00
Speaker 3: investigating it took it as as confirmation that that that
10:04
Speaker 3: Vladimir Putin was behind the Trump campaign and the entire
10:09
Speaker 3: the entire operation was a deliberate and false, uh misleading campaign.
10:18
Speaker 3: They that they they knew that it was. And and
10:21
Speaker 3: you know, here's one thing John Solomon uh says about
10:25
Speaker 3: the Durham Annix that just got released. Quote, this is
10:28
Speaker 3: the smoking gun evidence inside the Durham Annics. If it
10:31
Speaker 3: is authenticated by further investigation, it means liberal mega doner
10:36
Speaker 3: George Soros's team knew the whole Clinton plan for Russia
10:41
Speaker 3: Gate hoax four days before FBI opened up the probe,
10:47
Speaker 3: and so did Obama, Brennan and Comy. This was a
10:52
Speaker 3: deliberate lie, and everyone involved in it knew they were lying,
10:57
Speaker 3: and they were lying, number one, because they wanted to
11:01
Speaker 3: effectively steal the election, mislead the American people. And by
11:04
Speaker 3: the way, the Washington Posts of the New York Times
11:07
Speaker 3: both won Pulitzer Prizes for reporting on these lies, for
11:12
Speaker 3: repeating these lies, for being an avenue of propaganda and disinformation. So,
11:20
Speaker 3: of course the Washington Post and New York Times are
11:23
Speaker 3: very reluctant to cover what's being released now because it
11:26
Speaker 3: shows that they operated essentially as misinformation arms of the
11:30
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton campaign. They did it at first hoping to
11:33
Speaker 3: win the election through deception, but then after the election
11:36
Speaker 3: was over, after Donald Trump was elected to his first term,
11:39
Speaker 3: they did it within the government to try to undermine
11:43
Speaker 3: the newly elected president of the United States. And understand
11:46
Speaker 3: to do this it takes a real contempt not just
11:50
Speaker 3: for the incoming president, it takes a contempt for the voters.
11:52
Speaker 3: It takes a contempt for the democratic process. For someone
11:55
Speaker 3: that's in a senior government position, whether at the FBI
11:58
Speaker 3: or at the CIA or the Department of Justice, to say,
12:02
Speaker 3: I don't care that the American people elected this president,
12:06
Speaker 3: I don't like him, I disagree with him, and so
12:09
Speaker 3: I'm going to abuse my government position in order to
12:14
Speaker 3: try to destroy the presidency from within. And this was
12:18
Speaker 3: not accidental, This was not based on misunderstandings. This was
12:23
Speaker 3: a deliberate lie, and they knew they were lying.
12:27
Speaker 2: You look at this and you say, okay, this is
12:29
Speaker 2: a massive scheme. Now the question is I go back
12:34
Speaker 2: to it. I feel like I ask you this a
12:35
Speaker 2: lot when we have these issues come out. Will there
12:38
Speaker 2: be any accountability for this? We know that there's some
12:42
Speaker 2: that were pardoned by Biden, for example, that there's the
12:45
Speaker 2: question of was that the auto pen That doesn't come
12:48
Speaker 2: into play here. With Hillary Clinton, there have been people saying, Wow,
12:51
Speaker 2: you're not going to be able to get anything here
12:52
Speaker 2: because it is what it is. Politics is dirty? Get
12:55
Speaker 2: over it. Is this in the category of politics is dirty?
12:58
Speaker 1: Get over it? Or is there more there?
13:00
Speaker 3: So look, I hope there is accountability. Pambondi, the Attorney General,
13:04
Speaker 3: has created a strike force that is investigating these lies,
13:09
Speaker 3: investigating this cover up. The challenge is going to be
13:13
Speaker 3: the Statute of Limitations, and look at statutal limitations. It's
13:16
Speaker 3: it's ordinarily for something like this five years. The Statute
13:19
Speaker 3: Limitations is designed to stop prosecutors from bringing cases on
13:23
Speaker 3: things that are many, many years decades old. And there
13:26
Speaker 3: are a lot of reasons for that. But for most
13:30
Speaker 3: of this conduct it has passed the Statute of limitation.
13:33
Speaker 3: There's some exceptions. So for example, Andrew McCabe, the Deputy
13:37
Speaker 3: director of the FBI, lied to Congress and he did
13:40
Speaker 3: so within the last five years. And so McCabe McCabe
13:43
Speaker 3: of all of the players. Probably faces the greatest legal
13:46
Speaker 3: jeopardy because he's got If it can be demonstrated that
13:50
Speaker 3: he deliberately lied to Congress under oath, that that is
13:53
Speaker 3: a felony that carries jail time with him with respect
13:57
Speaker 3: to other conduct, other lies done under oath. If it
14:01
Speaker 3: happened before the Statute of Limitations. The only way to
14:04
Speaker 3: bring a prosecution is for the prosecutors to argue that
14:07
Speaker 3: the information was concealed and that told the Statute of limitations.
14:11
Speaker 3: That's a plausible argument, but it's difficult to prove it's not.
14:15
Speaker 3: Courts don't agree with that often, and so that makes
14:19
Speaker 3: it more challenging to bring those cases.
14:21
Speaker 1: So is this more of an issue now? Of all? Right?
14:23
Speaker 2: The American people know they relied to they know that
14:26
Speaker 2: there's corruptions at the highest level in our government. They
14:29
Speaker 2: know that they did this while they were in power,
14:32
Speaker 2: and they know they did to also cover up. And
14:35
Speaker 2: Hillary Clinton has still not been held accountable. I mean,
14:38
Speaker 2: some could argue maybe on election day when she's running
14:40
Speaker 2: against Trump, but with the email scandal and the declassified documents,
14:44
Speaker 2: you look at what she did compared to what they
14:46
Speaker 2: rated Marlago over it is disgusting the abuse of power
14:50
Speaker 2: by the Democratic Party over the last two administrations when
14:53
Speaker 2: they've been in power.
14:55
Speaker 3: It is And you look at a press release the
14:57
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton campaign put out and and it reads as follows,
15:01
Speaker 3: quote Hillary for America a statement on US government formally
15:06
Speaker 3: naming Russia responsible for election related hacks. John Podesta, chair
15:10
Speaker 3: of Hillary for America, released the following statement Friday, quote,
15:14
Speaker 3: the world now knows beyond a shadow of a doubt
15:17
Speaker 3: that the hack of the Democratic National Committee was carried
15:19
Speaker 3: out by the Russian government in a clear attempt to
15:21
Speaker 3: interfere with the integrity of our elections. The only remaining
15:24
Speaker 3: question is why Donald Trump continues to make apologies for
15:27
Speaker 3: the Russians. Trump's initial reaction to the hack in July
15:31
Speaker 3: was to invite further intrusions by the Russians, even after
15:34
Speaker 3: he was reportedly briefs on the very findings that were
15:36
Speaker 3: just publicly announced by the US government officials. He stood
15:39
Speaker 3: on a debate stage one week ago and played dumb
15:42
Speaker 3: about Russia's role in this hack. He has repeatedly praised
15:45
Speaker 3: Vladimir Putin, outlined a list of pro Putin policies, and
15:48
Speaker 3: has done hundreds of millions of dollars of business with
15:50
Speaker 3: Russian interests. Every word of what that press release said
15:55
Speaker 3: is false. They knew it was false, and they were
15:58
Speaker 3: willing to campaign based on Lawe and Hillary Clinton, according
16:01
Speaker 3: to this emails, personally approved those lies.
16:07
Speaker 2: Senator, I want to get to this other big issue,
16:09
Speaker 2: and that is Democrats are not just abandoning Israel. They
16:13
Speaker 2: are straight up anti Israel, and they're showing it now
16:17
Speaker 2: as they're voting. A record number of Senate Democrats are
16:21
Speaker 2: going to block weapons sales to Israel. They're doing it
16:26
Speaker 2: numbers we've never seen before. And this on top of
16:29
Speaker 2: the fact that The New York Times has had to
16:32
Speaker 2: basically correct the claim about a viral photo of a
16:36
Speaker 2: starving gods a boy they blamed on Israel and actually
16:40
Speaker 2: wasn't true at all, and they didn't correct it like
16:43
Speaker 2: in the paper. They did it on x on their
16:45
Speaker 2: PR account that like no one follows this is now
16:49
Speaker 2: how bad it's gotten not only in the media but
16:52
Speaker 2: also in DC.
16:54
Speaker 3: Well, you know, when I arrived in the Senate thirteen
16:56
Speaker 3: years ago, there was meaningful bipartisan support for is It
17:00
Speaker 3: was one of the issues that you could see Republicans
17:02
Speaker 3: and Democrats come together. Twenty thirteen. When I got here
17:07
Speaker 3: was the beginning of the second term of Barack Obama,
17:09
Speaker 3: and Barack Obama began to turn the Democrat Party against Israel.
17:15
Speaker 3: That turn accelerated dramatically during the Biden administration, and Joe
17:19
Speaker 3: Biden ended up being the most anti Israel president and
17:22
Speaker 3: the most anti Israel administration we've ever seen. Joe Biden,
17:26
Speaker 3: in the midst of a war that Israel was in,
17:29
Speaker 3: cut off weapons, froze weapons to Israel, and did so
17:32
Speaker 3: specifically to prevent Israel from killing terrorists Hamas, terrorists who
17:37
Speaker 3: had attacked Israel viciously in one of the most horrific
17:41
Speaker 3: terrorist attack in world history October seventh, where Hamas murdered
17:45
Speaker 3: over twelve hundred civilians, targeted civilians directly, raped and murdered
17:51
Speaker 3: women and little girls. And the Democrats, looking at the
17:55
Speaker 3: aftermath of this, more and more of them decided they
17:59
Speaker 3: stand with Hamas, and sadly, there is a real and
18:03
Speaker 3: growing pro Hamas contingent of the Democrat Party today. This week,
18:09
Speaker 3: Bernie Sanders brought a resolution trying to block weapons sales
18:13
Speaker 3: to Israel. Now Bernie Sanders has been rabidly anti Israel
18:17
Speaker 3: for a long time, most left wing socialists and Marxist are,
18:21
Speaker 3: but Bernie Sanders resolutions trying to cut off Israel usually failed,
18:25
Speaker 3: and usually failed with a big, big vote. Well, this
18:28
Speaker 3: week the Senate rejected it again, and we rejected it
18:31
Speaker 3: by a vote of seventy to twenty seven. But there
18:33
Speaker 3: were twenty seven votes in favor of Bernie Sanders's resolution.
18:38
Speaker 3: There are only forty seven Democrats in the Senate. That
18:41
Speaker 3: means more than half of the Senate Democrats voted to
18:46
Speaker 3: cut off funding for Israel. That is a dramatic shift.
18:49
Speaker 3: And by the way, if you compare it to in
18:51
Speaker 3: April we had a similar vote and only fifteen Democrats
18:56
Speaker 3: voted for it. In November of twenty twenty four, eighteen
18:59
Speaker 3: Democrats voted for for it. So so moving up to
19:02
Speaker 3: twenty seven is a major shift and and and it
19:06
Speaker 3: is a disturbing pattern where when faced with a choice,
19:12
Speaker 3: do we support Hamas or do we support Israel? More
19:16
Speaker 3: and more Democrats they're afraid of the aocs, They're afraid
19:19
Speaker 3: of the ilhan Omars, they're afraid of the Rashida Talibs.
19:22
Speaker 3: In the House, the the pro Hamas squad, and they're
19:26
Speaker 3: also afraid of the radical protesters on college campuses. Understand,
19:30
Speaker 3: those protesters are funded by George Soros. They're funded by
19:33
Speaker 3: the same people who fund the Democrat Party. And more
19:36
Speaker 3: and more elected Democrats have decided that that that they
19:39
Speaker 3: will not anger the pro Hamas radicals and and and
19:43
Speaker 3: so I've got to say it is sad to see. Uh,
19:47
Speaker 3: but let me ask you a question.
19:48
Speaker 1: By the way you mentioned yeah, well, and let me
19:51
Speaker 1: ask you this.
19:51
Speaker 2: So, look, we know that there's more people on the
19:55
Speaker 2: House side, so you'll get some you know, fringe groups
19:58
Speaker 2: in the House side on the Democratic Party already, even
20:01
Speaker 2: like more hardcore conservacicy in the past with Conservative caucuses,
20:05
Speaker 2: you can see numbers move there. The Senate's kind of
20:09
Speaker 2: been like the place of elder statesmen, and like there's
20:13
Speaker 2: certain issues that you kind of just see that like, hey,
20:16
Speaker 2: we're going to be the adults in the room. I
20:19
Speaker 2: think that's the scariest part of these votes I'm witnessing
20:22
Speaker 2: now is this has moved from the House and the
20:26
Speaker 2: radicals there that you kind of expected through that the
20:29
Speaker 2: AOC and her group, right, you expect it, But now
20:32
Speaker 2: it's moved into the Senate Chamber. And that is really,
20:37
Speaker 2: I think telling about the anti semitism of the Democratic Party.
20:40
Speaker 1: Am I wrong?
20:40
Speaker 3: More than half of the Senate Democrats voted to cut
20:45
Speaker 3: off military funding for Israel. That's a milestone that's never
20:48
Speaker 3: happened before. And by the way, it happened at the
20:50
Speaker 3: exact same time that we saw three governments worldwide, governments
20:55
Speaker 3: of US allies but that are led by leftists. The
20:59
Speaker 3: government of the United Kingdom, the government of France, and
21:02
Speaker 3: the government of Canada all came out in favor of
21:05
Speaker 3: recognizing an independent Palestinian state. And I want you to
21:09
Speaker 3: think about the message that the UK and France and
21:12
Speaker 3: Canada are saying. They're saying to Hamas your terrorism worked.
21:15
Speaker 3: They're saying to Hamas, we're glad you murdered twelve hundred
21:19
Speaker 3: innocent civilians. We're glad you raped women and little girls.
21:22
Speaker 3: By the way, they're also saying to Hamas, we're glad
21:24
Speaker 3: you continue to keep hostages to this day. You do
21:28
Speaker 3: not release the hostages. They're saying to Hamas, we're glad
21:32
Speaker 3: you're responsible for starving Palestinians and Gaza. Understand that the
21:37
Speaker 3: human suffering in Gaza is the direct result of Hamas.
21:40
Speaker 3: Hamas could end this right now. And Donald Trump, by contrast,
21:43
Speaker 3: put out a tweet this week and he said Hamas
21:45
Speaker 3: could end the suffering right now by stopping fighting and
21:50
Speaker 3: releasing the hostages. They don't want to, and in fact,
21:53
Speaker 3: Hamas is actively negotiating. You know what, they're negotiating for
21:57
Speaker 3: cut off food aid for Palestinians and Gaza. We Hamas
22:03
Speaker 3: want to control all the food because it's one of
22:05
Speaker 3: the ways we keep in power is by starving anyone
22:10
Speaker 3: who opposes us. That is who the United Kingdom and
22:14
Speaker 3: France and the Canadian government is supporting. And that is
22:17
Speaker 3: also sadly who now a majority of Senate Democrats are supporting.
22:22
Speaker 2: You also look at the media, and there's a second
22:24
Speaker 2: part of this conversation. The New York Times has had
22:28
Speaker 2: to roll back acclaim they put it out there of
22:31
Speaker 2: a viral photo of a starving Gaza boy. It was propaganda.
22:37
Speaker 2: It was clearly propaganda from the terrorists and those that
22:42
Speaker 2: want you to somehow believe that Israel's starving kids. It
22:46
Speaker 2: did not happen that way at all. The New York
22:50
Speaker 2: Times was forced to correct it, and I think they
22:53
Speaker 2: did it in such just a disgusting way because they
22:57
Speaker 2: issued their statement sharing how they quote originally didn't include
23:02
Speaker 2: this boy's pre existing health condition, But they didn't really
23:06
Speaker 2: do it in the newspaper like on the front page,
23:07
Speaker 2: where the same way they did the picture, the damage
23:10
Speaker 2: already been done. They corrected the story by going to
23:13
Speaker 2: the New York Times p R Twitter, not even the
23:18
Speaker 2: New York Times Twitter account, the New York Times pr
23:21
Speaker 2: account that virtually no one's gonna see.
23:24
Speaker 3: Yeah, look, this was not a picture that that they
23:27
Speaker 3: just had as a kind of side note in a
23:30
Speaker 3: small story. This is a picture the New York Times
23:33
Speaker 3: put on the front page. It occupies more than half
23:38
Speaker 3: of the front page, above the fold. It is a
23:40
Speaker 3: massive picture, and it's a horrible picture. It's a picture
23:42
Speaker 3: of a little boy. He appears to be starving. His
23:46
Speaker 3: spine is sticking out. I mean, it's a very disturbing.
23:48
Speaker 3: It's an eighteen month old child, which which they they
23:53
Speaker 3: said he was starving, he faced life threatening malnutrition, and
23:58
Speaker 3: they blame that on Israel and they used it to
24:01
Speaker 3: push Hamas's propaganda. After they did that, the New York
24:06
Speaker 3: Times was forced to issue a correction and they did
24:08
Speaker 3: the correction, as you noted on Twitter where no one
24:11
Speaker 3: would see it, And their correction says that what they
24:15
Speaker 3: didn't tell people Here's what their statement was.
24:17
Speaker 1: Quote.
24:17
Speaker 3: Children in Gaza are malnourished and starving, as New York
24:20
Speaker 3: reporters and others have documented. We recently ran a story
24:23
Speaker 3: about Gaza's most vulnerable civilians, including Mohammad Zakira al Mataqua,
24:28
Speaker 3: who is about eighteen months old and suffers from severe malnutrition.
24:32
Speaker 3: We have since learned new information, including from the hospital
24:35
Speaker 3: that has treated him and his medical records, and have
24:38
Speaker 3: updated our story to add context about his pre existing
24:41
Speaker 3: health problems. This additional detail gives readers greater understanding of
24:45
Speaker 3: his situation. Our reporters and photographers continue to report from
24:49
Speaker 3: Gaza bravely, sensitively, and at personal risk, so that our
24:54
Speaker 3: readers can see firsthand the consequences of the war. That's
24:58
Speaker 3: their fairly ridiculous retract where they admit they're lying to you.
25:02
Speaker 3: Now here's what they didn't tell us That Muhamma's mother
25:06
Speaker 3: indicated that her son suffers from quote a muscle disorder
25:10
Speaker 3: through which he received specialized nutrition and physical therapy. And
25:16
Speaker 3: another journalist reported the young boy has quote cerebral palsy,
25:21
Speaker 3: hypoexemia and was born with a serious genetic order. So
25:26
Speaker 3: they showed a child who's very sick, but he's not
25:30
Speaker 3: very sick from starvation, he's very sick from other medical conditions.
25:34
Speaker 3: And the New York Times happily plays the role of
25:37
Speaker 3: Hamas's propagandists, and sadly Senate Democrats are cheering on that
25:43
Speaker 3: false propaganda. Interestingly enough, the pattern of this is exactly
25:48
Speaker 3: the same as the pattern of Hillary Clinton signing off
25:51
Speaker 3: on the false Russia story. It is take a lie,
25:55
Speaker 3: count on the corporate media to spread that lie, count
25:58
Speaker 3: on Democrat politicians to spread that not lie, and count
26:01
Speaker 3: on friendly governments to spread that lie as well. And
26:04
Speaker 3: and everyone involves knows they are lying, but their political
26:09
Speaker 3: agenda in this instance they hate Israel, they want to
26:12
Speaker 3: undermine Israel, and they want to elevate Hamas, and sadly
26:16
Speaker 3: that more and more Senate Democrats are falling into that camp.
26:19
Speaker 2: Senata, I want to move to this new report that's
26:22
Speaker 2: come out, and it is something that we have been
26:26
Speaker 2: really like raising the flag on, saying pay attention to this,
26:30
Speaker 2: be careful where you send your kids to college, be
26:33
Speaker 2: careful that they're going to be indoctrinated to hate America. Uh,
26:36
Speaker 2: and be careful where you send your kids, because there's
26:39
Speaker 2: a lot of money that's coming in from countries that
26:43
Speaker 2: are trying to undermine America and hate America. We're now
26:47
Speaker 2: seeing more of this at Harvard, with Harvard's ties now
26:52
Speaker 2: directly to the Chinese Communist Party elites. That has been
26:56
Speaker 2: revealed on a level we haven't seen before, and it's
27:00
Speaker 2: been more shocking of where Harvard's getting their cash. And look,
27:03
Speaker 2: China is not doing this because they like Harvard. They're
27:07
Speaker 2: clearly doing it.
27:08
Speaker 3: For influence, unquestionably, and you know, you know, some have
27:12
Speaker 3: criticized the Trump administration going after Harvard University. Harvard is
27:17
Speaker 3: the most influential university on the face of the planet,
27:21
Speaker 3: and it also many universities in America have been in
27:25
Speaker 3: bed with the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese government spends
27:30
Speaker 3: millions of dollars trying to get influence and trying to
27:33
Speaker 3: brainwash our students, trying to control our universities, and far
27:37
Speaker 3: too many universities have been really eager to participate in that.
27:40
Speaker 3: And Harvard has been right at the front of the
27:42
Speaker 3: list well this week that the House of Representatives has
27:45
Speaker 3: an investigation and they sent a letter to the President
27:48
Speaker 3: of Harvard. This is a letter from John Mullinar, who
27:50
Speaker 3: is the chairman of the Select Committee on the CCP
27:53
Speaker 3: in the House. It's from Tim Wahlberg, who's the chairman
27:55
Speaker 3: of the House Committee on Education and Workforce. And it's
27:58
Speaker 3: from Alie Stephonic, the chairwoman of House Republican Leadership. And
28:03
Speaker 3: here's what the letter says. It's addressed to the President
28:05
Speaker 3: of Harvard University, Alan Garber, and it says, Dear President Garber.
28:09
Speaker 3: The Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and the
28:12
Speaker 3: Committee on Education and Workforce have identified new evidence related
28:15
Speaker 3: to Harvard University's connections to the Chinese Communist Party and
28:19
Speaker 3: request additional information. During our investigation, multiple whistleblowers told us
28:24
Speaker 3: that Harvard has maintained close formal relationships directly with Chinese
28:30
Speaker 3: Communist Party entities. Specifically, whistleblower information revealed ties between Harvard
28:37
Speaker 3: and the Central Organization Department of the Central Committee of
28:40
Speaker 3: the CCP, as well as certain Chinese government entities. The
28:45
Speaker 3: CCP Organization Department is one of the most powerful bodies
28:48
Speaker 3: within the Communist Party. It is responsible for the regimated,
28:52
Speaker 3: regimented training program centered on Shijingping thought provided to the
28:57
Speaker 3: party elites, and controls the p placemen of CCP members
29:01
Speaker 3: in key leadership positions. The whistleblowers also revealed that Harvard
29:06
Speaker 3: cultivates ties with elite CCP members. For example, whistleblowers reveal
29:12
Speaker 3: that the Harvard Kennedy School hosts a formal partnership with
29:15
Speaker 3: the Chinese Executive Leadership Academy Poodong, which is controlled by
29:20
Speaker 3: the CCP Organization Department. Under that partnership, the rising CCP elite,
29:25
Speaker 3: who are being prepared for senior Communist Party leadership positions,
29:29
Speaker 3: participate in training at Harvard in the United States. Additional
29:36
Speaker 3: publicly available information indicates that some of these relationships have
29:39
Speaker 3: been in place for at least a decade. In twenty sixteen,
29:44
Speaker 3: a high ranking member of the Chinese Academy of Social
29:46
Speaker 3: Sciences stated that Chinese Quote Party and government cadres participate
29:52
Speaker 3: in education and training run by the CCP Organization Department.
29:56
Speaker 3: The Chinese government sends some cadres aba abroad to the
30:00
Speaker 3: John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. This
30:05
Speaker 3: is shocking, and it certainly appears from this investigation. And
30:11
Speaker 3: they request all documents related to any engagement between Harvard
30:15
Speaker 3: and the CCP and the government of China, and a
30:18
Speaker 3: list of all money that has come from China and
30:20
Speaker 3: the Chinese government. And my prediction is Harvard is going
30:24
Speaker 3: to fight tooth and nail not to turn this over
30:26
Speaker 3: because they don't want people to know just how eager
30:31
Speaker 3: they have been to be in bed with the communists
30:35
Speaker 3: running the Chinese government.
30:37
Speaker 2: Can we also just be very queer, like China doesn't
30:39
Speaker 2: do this because they like higher education or they're just
30:42
Speaker 2: trying to get let's say they're students in That would
30:44
Speaker 2: be like the most g rated version of the story
30:47
Speaker 2: that you could tell. They're doing this to buy genuine
30:51
Speaker 2: influence at the highest levels in academia and America. And
30:55
Speaker 2: also this could have major consequences for the US when
30:59
Speaker 2: it comes to national security or spies and countless other
31:03
Speaker 2: infiltration activities that they're part of all the time.
31:07
Speaker 3: Look, that's exactly right. You look at Harvard trains many
31:12
Speaker 3: of our nation's elite. For example, I just typed in
31:15
Speaker 3: a quick list on on on Ai how many senators
31:20
Speaker 3: went to Harvard, and Ai promptly gave me an answer.
31:23
Speaker 3: There are currently twelve senators who are Harvard alumni, and
31:27
Speaker 3: I will admit sadly that it came back and says
31:30
Speaker 3: the list includes individuals like Ted Cruz, Tim Kane, Jack Reed,
31:33
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer, and Mitt Romney. So so I'm a little
31:35
Speaker 3: embarrassed to be the first name on that list. But
31:39
Speaker 3: that is part of the reason that that that that
31:41
Speaker 3: Harvard puts that Harvard, that China puts that money into Harvard,
31:46
Speaker 3: into Columbia, into elite universities across this country. Is they
31:51
Speaker 3: want to train America's leaders. They want to train members
31:54
Speaker 3: of Congress, they want to train members of the executive branch.
31:56
Speaker 3: They want to train federal judges. They want to train
31:58
Speaker 3: the foreign pologies apparatus uh and and and they are
32:02
Speaker 3: trying to train them uh and and they're trying to
32:04
Speaker 3: propaganda as they use this for brainwashing, they use this
32:07
Speaker 3: for espionage. And and far too many of our universities
32:12
Speaker 3: have been so eager to take the money. Uh that
32:15
Speaker 3: that that they have welcomed Chinese communists with open arms.
32:20
Speaker 2: When you look at where they are right now and
32:23
Speaker 2: you look at Harvard, is this just about the money,
32:26
Speaker 2: do you think or is this also about the fact
32:29
Speaker 2: that Harvard has no problem agreeing on a lot of
32:32
Speaker 2: issues with China.
32:35
Speaker 3: Well, it's both and and listen, the Harvard faculty is
32:37
Speaker 3: is hard left. One one point I've I've said many
32:40
Speaker 3: times is that when I was a student at Harvard
32:42
Speaker 3: Law School, there were more professors who were Communists than
32:48
Speaker 3: there were who were Republicans. And and that's not hyperbole
32:51
Speaker 3: that there were at least a dozen professors who openly
32:54
Speaker 3: said they were Marxists, that they were followers of the
32:56
Speaker 3: teachers teachings of Karl Marx, and and followers of of
33:00
Speaker 3: you know, Karl Marx is the father of Communism. When
33:03
Speaker 3: I was a student there there was only one professor
33:05
Speaker 3: who openly identified as Republican. That was Charles Freed. And
33:10
Speaker 3: by the way, Charles Freed, the loan Republican on the
33:12
Speaker 3: faculty voted for Barack Obama, so so their loan Republican
33:16
Speaker 3: voted for Obama as well. That that was the range
33:19
Speaker 3: of thought thirty years ago, and it is much much
33:23
Speaker 3: worse now, as you know. My most recent book is
33:27
Speaker 3: entitled Unwoke, How to Defeat Cultural Marxism, in America, And
33:31
Speaker 3: the opening chapter talks about cultural Marxism, how it it.
33:35
Speaker 3: It grew at Harvard University, it spread to universities throughout
33:40
Speaker 3: this country. It spread to K through twelve, education, to journalism,
33:43
Speaker 3: to big business, to big tech, to entertainment, uh and
33:46
Speaker 3: and and sadly, you know, I called the universities the
33:49
Speaker 3: Wuhan lab of the Woke virus because they're where it
33:53
Speaker 3: was created, They're where it mutated, and they're where it spread.
33:57
Speaker 3: And and and Harvard was ground zero for that spread.
34:04
Speaker 2: Final question on this, will Congress be able to really
34:07
Speaker 2: do anything on this issue to stop this type of
34:11
Speaker 2: money coming into these universities.
34:14
Speaker 3: Look, I hope.
34:15
Speaker 1: So.
34:15
Speaker 3: One of the very first pieces of legislation that I
34:17
Speaker 3: passed thirteen years ago was legislation that banned Defense Department
34:22
Speaker 3: money from going to universities that have Confucius institutes. Confucius
34:27
Speaker 3: institutes were paid for by the Chinese Communist government. They
34:31
Speaker 3: were at universities all over the country. I got that through,
34:34
Speaker 3: I got that passed and signed into law. I actually
34:36
Speaker 3: got bipartisan support for it, and as a result, dozens
34:40
Speaker 3: of Confucius institutes shut down all over the country. So
34:43
Speaker 3: we can make a real impact. I've got more legislation
34:47
Speaker 3: to require transparency of foreign money going to universities. We
34:51
Speaker 3: ought to know about it. And look, the Trump administration
34:54
Speaker 3: is trying hard to expose this and to stop it,
34:58
Speaker 3: and I salute the president for doing Don't forget.
35:01
Speaker 2: We do this show as a podcast three days a week.
35:04
Speaker 2: So wherever you're listening right now, makes you download Vertic
35:07
Speaker 2: with Ted Cruise so you don't miss a single episode. Plus,
35:10
Speaker 2: when you hear the show and there's intel in here
35:12
Speaker 2: you like, you can share those episodes directly with your
35:15
Speaker 2: family and friends as well. So download Vertic with Tech
35:18
Speaker 2: Cruse wherever you get your podcasts and the Center, and
35:21
Speaker 2: I will see you back here next week.