Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / FAA in Technology Crisis, Drug Price Shakedown & Can One Judge take the Power of POTUS

Transcript

FAA in Technology Crisis, Drug Price Shakedown & Can One Judge take the Power of POTUS · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: If you take a look at the pharmaceutical and drug cuts,
0:04
Speaker 1: they're so massive that I think a lot of Democrats
0:07
Speaker 1: have to vote for the bill number one, number two,
0:10
Speaker 1: even if I didn't do this today, even if there
0:12
Speaker 1: was no such thing as he's you know, fifty to
0:14
Speaker 1: ninety percent cuts.
0:15
Speaker 2: I mean, think of it.
0:16
Speaker 1: Will we're buying You're selling drugs in other countries for
0:20
Speaker 1: five times more than.
0:22
Speaker 2: A cost in the United States. How horrible that is anyway,
0:24
Speaker 2: but that's going to.
0:26
Speaker 3: Be a thing of the bet.
0:27
Speaker 4: You're listening to the forty seven Morning Update with Ben Ferguson.
0:31
Speaker 5: Good Saturday morning to you.
0:32
Speaker 6: Ben Ferguson with you, and these are some of the
0:35
Speaker 6: stories that you may have missed that we talked about
0:38
Speaker 6: this week on the forty seven Morning Update. First up,
0:41
Speaker 6: in a shocking report, we're finding out just how bad
0:45
Speaker 6: things are at the FAA, including the fact that the
0:48
Speaker 6: equipment is so antiquated that they're having to buy replacement
0:52
Speaker 6: parts on eBay, Donald Trump pledging he's going to fix
0:56
Speaker 6: and overhaul the entire system. Up next, a massive deal
1:00
Speaker 6: on prescription drug prices. And finally, I will be joined
1:05
Speaker 6: by a good friend of mine, my former roommate who's
1:07
Speaker 6: now the West Virginia Attorney General, who is standing up
1:11
Speaker 6: to make sure that these activist judges in these district
1:14
Speaker 6: courts are not actually making rulings that would take away
1:18
Speaker 6: the power of the presidency. It's the forty seven Morning Update,
1:22
Speaker 6: and it starts right now.
1:23
Speaker 4: Story number one.
1:24
Speaker 6: In a shocking revelation, we now have found out that
1:28
Speaker 6: the FAA, the Federal Aviation Administration, is relying on such
1:33
Speaker 6: outdated technology that the Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, has disclosed
1:38
Speaker 6: that the agency is forced to purchase replacement parts on
1:42
Speaker 6: platforms like eBay due to how obsolete their current systems are.
1:48
Speaker 6: The administration is now promising that there will be a
1:52
Speaker 6: massive overhaul the system, but it could take years to accomplish.
1:57
Speaker 6: Sean Duffy doing a sit down interview with CBS this
2:02
Speaker 6: morning explaining just how bad the system is and why
2:06
Speaker 6: Donald Trump has told him it's time to overhaul it
2:09
Speaker 6: as fast as we can.
2:11
Speaker 7: Our main mission is safety, and so if there's any
2:14
Speaker 7: concern with safety, we slow down traffic and there might
2:16
Speaker 7: be delayed there might be cancelations, and we take those
2:20
Speaker 7: precautions to make sure that you get from your departure
2:23
Speaker 7: city to your arrival city.
2:26
Speaker 3: But it's gonna take a little bit of time.
2:27
Speaker 7: Now, the main line that feeds information into Newark that
2:31
Speaker 7: went down, the secondary line didn't stand up, and so
2:35
Speaker 7: both lines are now working. We have a little bit
2:37
Speaker 7: of issues with our air traffic controllers. Some of them
2:39
Speaker 7: have stepped out of the tower they were stressed. So
2:42
Speaker 7: we're training new individuals in the Philly Traycon which services Newark,
2:47
Speaker 7: and we're building a whole new fiber driven system down
2:51
Speaker 7: in Philly that does serve that Traycon or the Nework airport.
2:55
Speaker 7: So it doesn't weren't a situation where you know, it's
2:57
Speaker 7: gonna take us a little bit of time. I hope
2:59
Speaker 7: by this summer we're going to be fully functioning.
3:02
Speaker 2: Yeah.
3:02
Speaker 8: I was going to say, mister Duffie, what does that
3:04
Speaker 8: mean when you say a little bit of time you
3:05
Speaker 8: say by the summer, because I'm thinking the problem with
3:08
Speaker 8: Newark is when you hear the screens went down and
3:10
Speaker 8: no one seemed to be able to explain that. You
3:12
Speaker 8: don't think we have to worry about that happening again.
3:14
Speaker 3: You think they've corrected that.
3:16
Speaker 7: Problem well in Newark, both lines are working and so
3:20
Speaker 7: you know, listen, yes, and if both lines do go down,
3:22
Speaker 7: there are emergency procedures, backup procedures that we take to
3:25
Speaker 7: talk to airplanes to make sure they stay separated.
3:27
Speaker 3: But Gail, I'm concerned.
3:29
Speaker 7: I mean this system that we use many much of
3:32
Speaker 7: the equipment you have to buy an ebait. No one
3:34
Speaker 7: makes it anymore. That's how old the system is that
3:37
Speaker 7: we fly on today, which is why yesterday I called
3:40
Speaker 7: for a brand new infrastructure plan to rebuild everything across
3:44
Speaker 7: the spectrum for air traffic control. It is well overdue
3:48
Speaker 7: in America, and I think what you've seen in Newark
3:51
Speaker 7: is you're having failings. And when you have the failings,
3:53
Speaker 7: you take a look at the whole system and could
3:55
Speaker 7: other parts, you know, have issues.
3:57
Speaker 3: Of course it could have issues.
3:59
Speaker 7: But that's why it's all the action to do this
4:00
Speaker 7: for America so you always feel safe in your flying gale.
4:03
Speaker 6: Thank goodness to Trump administration is willing to take on
4:06
Speaker 6: a problem that every other administration just wanted.
4:09
Speaker 5: To kick the can down the road.
4:11
Speaker 6: And we'll finally be able to know that we have
4:13
Speaker 6: a system that's reliable and safe and parts are no
4:16
Speaker 6: longer being bought on eBay. Next story number two, Major
4:20
Speaker 6: victory number one for the American people is going to
4:24
Speaker 6: have a massive impact on so many Americans that deal
4:28
Speaker 6: with high costs of prescription drugs.
4:31
Speaker 5: Here is what you need to.
4:33
Speaker 6: Know about what the President has done to lower the
4:36
Speaker 6: price of prescription drugs for all Americans. The announcement and
4:41
Speaker 6: the action put forth saying American patients will be first
4:46
Speaker 6: instead of the pharmaceutical companies by Donald Trump will have
4:49
Speaker 6: an impact for every American. Now, this should not be
4:52
Speaker 6: a conservative or liberal, or Republican or democratic issue, yet
4:57
Speaker 6: Democrats are angry about it. So let me tell tell
5:00
Speaker 6: you exactly how this is going to have an impact
5:02
Speaker 6: on you. First up, the President said that we are
5:06
Speaker 6: now going to have most favored nation prescription drug pricing,
5:12
Speaker 6: saying we are going to pay the lowest price that
5:14
Speaker 6: there is in the world.
5:15
Speaker 5: Here's the President in his own words.
5:18
Speaker 1: But it's called most favored nation. We are going to
5:20
Speaker 1: pay the lowest price there is in the world. We
5:23
Speaker 1: will get whoever is paying the lowest price. That's the
5:26
Speaker 1: price that we're going to get. So remember that. So
5:28
Speaker 1: we're no longer paying ten times more than another country.
5:32
Speaker 2: Whoever is paying the lowest price.
5:34
Speaker 1: We will look at that price and we will say
5:36
Speaker 1: that's the price we're going to pay.
5:37
Speaker 2: Most favored nations. That's what it is.
5:40
Speaker 1: One breast cancer drug costs Americans over sixteen thousand dollars
5:46
Speaker 1: per bottle, but the same drug from the same factory,
5:49
Speaker 1: manufactured by the same company is one sixth that price
5:53
Speaker 1: in Australia and one tenth that price in Sweden.
5:57
Speaker 2: One tent for the identical product.
5:59
Speaker 1: A common as ma drug costs almost five hundred dollars
6:02
Speaker 1: here in America, but costs less than forty dollars in
6:05
Speaker 1: the United Kingdom. So forty dollars in the United Kingdom,
6:09
Speaker 1: which is where this gentleman told me he paid a
6:11
Speaker 1: small amount for his shot. But think of that, So
6:14
Speaker 1: forty dollars versus five hundred dollars.
6:17
Speaker 6: Here, forty compared to five hundred dollars. The difference between
6:21
Speaker 6: the UK and the US. Now, let me explain more
6:24
Speaker 6: about this order. The order directs the US Trade Representative
6:27
Speaker 6: and the Secretary of Commerce to take action to ensure
6:31
Speaker 6: foreign countries are not engaged in practices that purposefully and
6:35
Speaker 6: unfairly undercut market prices and drive price hikes in the
6:40
Speaker 6: United States. All what I'm giving you right now is
6:43
Speaker 6: coming directly from the White House. I want to make
6:45
Speaker 6: that very clear. Number Two, the order instructs the Administration
6:49
Speaker 6: to communicate price targets to pharmaceutical manufacturers to establish that America,
6:54
Speaker 6: the largest purchaser and funder of prescription drugs in the world,
6:59
Speaker 6: gets the best price. The Secretary of Health and Human
7:02
Speaker 6: Services is going to establish a mechanism through which American
7:06
Speaker 6: patients can buy their drugs directly from manufacturers who sell
7:10
Speaker 6: to Americans at a quote most favored nation price, bypassing
7:16
Speaker 6: the middlemen, and finally for the White House. If drug
7:19
Speaker 6: manufacturers fail to offer most Favored nation pricing, the order
7:24
Speaker 6: directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to one
7:27
Speaker 6: propose rules and impose most favored nation pricing, and two
7:32
Speaker 6: take other aggressive measures to significantly reduce the cost of
7:36
Speaker 6: prescription drugs the American consumer, and most importantly, in anti
7:41
Speaker 6: competitive practices. Why because the White House says it's about
7:45
Speaker 6: getting a better deal for Americans and President Trump once
7:49
Speaker 6: again taking action to keep pharmaceutical manufacturers from charging Americans
7:54
Speaker 6: high drug prices while giving steep discounts to other wealthy
7:58
Speaker 6: nations that is something that doctor Oz talked about the
8:01
Speaker 6: White House with the President by his side, and here
8:04
Speaker 6: is what he said.
8:05
Speaker 9: That means that we are paying in America four times
8:09
Speaker 9: more than that drug costs in other countries. Again, one
8:12
Speaker 9: hundred percents the baseline. It's two hundred and eighty nine
8:14
Speaker 9: percent above that baseline. It goes all the way down
8:16
Speaker 9: to where we're paying fifty percent more than any other country.
8:19
Speaker 9: That's the range, as was pointed out by President Trump,
8:21
Speaker 9: half the time, we're paying three times more than it's
8:24
Speaker 9: paid in other countries. It doesn't make any sense for
8:26
Speaker 9: the system that stated President Trump is over and over
8:28
Speaker 9: again indicated, and Secretary Kennedy has reflected as well.
8:31
Speaker 5: We want innovation.
8:33
Speaker 9: We want our technology partners doing the best they can
8:36
Speaker 9: to make the best solutions for drugs to cure as
8:38
Speaker 9: many people in America and around the world as possible.
8:41
Speaker 9: By getting our allies to pay a bit more as
8:44
Speaker 9: they should be and they should have for many years
8:46
Speaker 9: been doing, will course correct a problem that's gotten out
8:49
Speaker 9: of hand. And by doing that in a thoughtful, effective way,
8:52
Speaker 9: we're going to be able to get the pharmaceutical industry hole.
8:54
Speaker 5: Those jobs will still be here. Will still be productive.
8:56
Speaker 9: We'll still be curing cancer and a slew of other
8:58
Speaker 9: ailments that plague humanity.
9:00
Speaker 3: America will still be the leader in this space.
9:02
Speaker 9: But we're paying the appropriate amount, the right sized amount,
9:06
Speaker 9: for those tasks.
9:07
Speaker 6: Now you may ask yourself this question, why is the
9:10
Speaker 6: president doing this?
9:11
Speaker 5: Well, it's all in the numbers.
9:13
Speaker 6: The United States has less than five percent of the
9:17
Speaker 6: world's population, yet funds roughly seventy five percent of global
9:22
Speaker 6: pharmaceutical profits.
9:23
Speaker 5: Here's the other thing you may not know.
9:25
Speaker 6: Drug manufacturers discount their products to gain access to foreign markets,
9:31
Speaker 6: and then subsidize those discounts through high prices charged in America.
9:35
Speaker 6: In essence, you are subsidizing drug manufacturer profits and foreign
9:40
Speaker 6: health systems are getting the big deal, despite drug manufacturers
9:45
Speaker 6: benefiting from generous research subsidies and enormous healthcare spending by
9:50
Speaker 6: the US government. Now on his first term, you may
9:53
Speaker 6: not know this, but President Trump took historic action to
9:56
Speaker 6: keep Medicare and seniors from paying more for drugs than
10:00
Speaker 6: economically comparable countries, which the Biden administration rescinded before it
10:06
Speaker 6: could even take effect. Why because they're owned by big pharma.
10:10
Speaker 6: Instead of fixing this problem. The Biden administration's greatest achievement
10:14
Speaker 6: was to negotiate prices that were on average seventy eight
10:20
Speaker 6: percent higher than an eleven comparable countries as part of
10:24
Speaker 6: Biden's efforts to quote beat medicare. In translation, the Democratic
10:30
Speaker 6: Party sold you out, the Americans who are suffering and
10:34
Speaker 6: desperately need pharmaceutical drugs, and they sold you out to
10:37
Speaker 6: the highest bidder, the lobbyists and the companies that came
10:41
Speaker 6: in and said this is what we need. The President
10:44
Speaker 6: making it clear this is never going to happen again
10:47
Speaker 6: in the US and as long as he is present,
10:50
Speaker 6: he is going to fight for innovation, fight for technology,
10:54
Speaker 6: and make sure that you are paying less than any
10:57
Speaker 6: other major nation in the world.
10:59
Speaker 5: Finally, story number three.
11:01
Speaker 6: Former roommate you don't get to say this every day,
11:04
Speaker 6: is also the Attorney General from West Virginia. We were
11:08
Speaker 6: together actually on Capitol Hill. I'm staring at the Supreme
11:11
Speaker 6: Court right now, and he was in the Supreme Court
11:15
Speaker 6: today for this important, this major case on judges power.
11:20
Speaker 6: And I want to go to you, JB on this
11:22
Speaker 6: so that you can explain how all this started. In essence,
11:27
Speaker 6: you had judges that were making decisions that were covering
11:30
Speaker 6: the entire country. And the argument is, maybe that's not
11:34
Speaker 6: how it's supposed to be on these local levels or
11:37
Speaker 6: these these smaller court battles, And this is what this
11:40
Speaker 6: is all about.
11:41
Speaker 10: Yeah, I think you what you just said there makes
11:43
Speaker 10: a lot of sense. This is a national issue that
11:46
Speaker 10: was the soul that was decided or attempted to be
11:49
Speaker 10: decided by a district court judge. And so what happens,
11:53
Speaker 10: and this has been happening a lot, especially very recently
11:56
Speaker 10: within the last thirty years, and it's a bipartisan problem then,
11:59
Speaker 10: is that district court judges are adjoining presidential decrees right
12:05
Speaker 10: and saying what the president has done is not just
12:08
Speaker 10: illegal in my courtroom, but it's illegal in the entire country.
12:12
Speaker 10: And our process is set up differently than that. Our
12:15
Speaker 10: district court judges are supposed to hear cases that are
12:18
Speaker 10: in front of them and make decisions for the plaintiffs
12:21
Speaker 10: that are in front of them. Here, several interest groups
12:24
Speaker 10: in several states sued in a I'm going to just
12:28
Speaker 10: say a friendly jurisdiction, which is how this works, as
12:31
Speaker 10: you find a judge that is ideologically aligned with you,
12:33
Speaker 10: and you get them to enjoin an entire action that
12:37
Speaker 10: happened in this case in New Jersey, and so a
12:39
Speaker 10: New Jersey judge then decided, for all other of the
12:43
Speaker 10: six hundred district court judges and all of the circuit judges,
12:46
Speaker 10: and ostensibly for the Supreme Court whether or not a
12:49
Speaker 10: presidential order was constitutional. While we did not get into
12:54
Speaker 10: the underlying facts of this case today, ben what the
12:57
Speaker 10: Supreme Court was hearing, and what our brief described was
12:59
Speaker 10: the reasons why this is both unconstitutional and a bad idea. So,
13:04
Speaker 10: for one, both the history of our courts as you
13:07
Speaker 10: look back into the courts of Chancery in England, as
13:11
Speaker 10: well as Article three, which was written to delineate the
13:14
Speaker 10: powers of our courts, indicate that circuit judges do not
13:18
Speaker 10: have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions. Further, our brief
13:23
Speaker 10: gets into the idea that there is a remedy here,
13:25
Speaker 10: and the remedy is is that if you're looking to
13:28
Speaker 10: have a district court make a decision for a large
13:32
Speaker 10: number of people, you have to go through what's called
13:34
Speaker 10: a Rule twenty three and create a class action, so
13:37
Speaker 10: then the court knows who the plaintiffs are, that they're
13:40
Speaker 10: trying to address a problem for and fourth, and maybe
13:44
Speaker 10: most importantly is that district courts and our federal court systems,
13:49
Speaker 10: they are life tenured for a reason, and that is
13:52
Speaker 10: to eliminate the stench of politics from the benches around
13:58
Speaker 10: the country. And when you do forum shopping and you
14:01
Speaker 10: start to use these universal injunctions in these sort of
14:04
Speaker 10: weaponized ways, what you then will find, I believe and
14:09
Speaker 10: our brief delineates that the confidence that the public has
14:12
Speaker 10: in the independence of our judiciary will go down very quickly.
14:17
Speaker 10: And that is the single most important branch for the
14:19
Speaker 10: public to have confidence in, because it is their orders
14:22
Speaker 10: and it is their writings that tell every American how
14:26
Speaker 10: the Constitution is being interpreted as it relates to the
14:30
Speaker 10: laws that apply to them. So this is a really
14:32
Speaker 10: big case. We feel really really good about our briefing.
14:36
Speaker 10: The people in West Virginia joined with a group called
14:38
Speaker 10: the American Center for Law and Justice in this briefing,
14:42
Speaker 10: and we're very hopeful that the Court will use our
14:45
Speaker 10: amicus to guide them into what I believe is a
14:48
Speaker 10: proper decision, and that is the district courts lack the
14:51
Speaker 10: ability to adjoin the entire country as it relates to
14:55
Speaker 10: presidential executive orders.
14:56
Speaker 6: So let's talk about the amicus brief and break that down.
15:00
Speaker 6: The goal of an amicus brief and people that are listening.
15:03
Speaker 6: My guest with me is the Attorney General from West Virginia, JB. McCuskey.
15:06
Speaker 6: I want a dear friend of mine, former roommate, and were,
15:09
Speaker 6: as I stare at literally at the Supreme Court right now,
15:11
Speaker 6: you just left the Supreme Court where you guys filed
15:14
Speaker 6: this amicus brief with the ACLJ. What is the goal
15:19
Speaker 6: of an amicus brief for people that maybe don't understand
15:21
Speaker 6: that terminology, maybe they've ever heard it before, And specifically,
15:25
Speaker 6: what did you guys put in that amicus brief that
15:28
Speaker 6: you're hoping that the justices will get from it and
15:31
Speaker 6: read from it on this case.
15:33
Speaker 10: Yeah, So an amicus brief is in layman's term, it's
15:35
Speaker 10: called a friend of the court brief. And so what
15:38
Speaker 10: its purpose is is to help the justices as they're
15:41
Speaker 10: making their decision with parties who have an interest in
15:44
Speaker 10: the outcome. And in West Virginia, the interest in this
15:46
Speaker 10: outcome comes from this widespread weaponized use of nationwide injunctions
15:52
Speaker 10: we just saw within the last week a nation a
15:55
Speaker 10: wide injunction out of the state of Washington that will
15:58
Speaker 10: stop President Trump's executive orders on the use of coal
16:01
Speaker 10: and lowering electricity rates for Americans and putting West Virginia
16:04
Speaker 10: coal miners back to work today in order to meet
16:08
Speaker 10: our nation's energy needs. And so for us, these nationwide injunctions,
16:12
Speaker 10: when you're a small rural state, are never going to
16:15
Speaker 10: be the forum that gets shopped into right. They're never
16:17
Speaker 10: going to ask real patriotic Americans like they are in
16:20
Speaker 10: West Virginia to answer these questions. They're going to go
16:22
Speaker 10: to places where it's a little different. And so we
16:24
Speaker 10: have a huge interest in ensuring that the process plays
16:27
Speaker 10: out in nationwide injunctions to make sure that these the
16:32
Speaker 10: president's executive orders as they relate to the economy and
16:35
Speaker 10: the people of West Virginia are upheld and if they
16:38
Speaker 10: are found to be unconstitutional, that they go through the
16:40
Speaker 10: proper channels. And that is what our brief says. Our
16:43
Speaker 10: brief says that it isn't that the plaintiffs don't have
16:47
Speaker 10: any options. Our brief says the options that they chose
16:51
Speaker 10: are not available to the court that made them. So
16:54
Speaker 10: they needed to have gone through what's called a rule
16:56
Speaker 10: twenty three, as I just said, and explain to the
16:58
Speaker 10: court why they have a class of plaintiffs that have
17:02
Speaker 10: a similar need for this same kind of relief, and
17:05
Speaker 10: then the court can order that those people get that relief.
17:09
Speaker 10: And then if another district court or another circuit court
17:12
Speaker 10: comes to a contrary conclusion, then the Supreme Court can
17:15
Speaker 10: use that. The Supreme Court's power generally comes from when
17:20
Speaker 10: they are deciding between circuits that have a different interpretation
17:23
Speaker 10: of the law. And in this instance, they circumvented that
17:26
Speaker 10: entire process by getting one single district court judge to
17:30
Speaker 10: speak for the entire country. And that is not allowed
17:33
Speaker 10: under Article three. And it's a really bad idea in
17:35
Speaker 10: terms of public confidence and the independence of our judicial branch.
17:40
Speaker 6: Is it fair to say that the mechanism that's being
17:43
Speaker 6: used by the left to go and find these friendly
17:46
Speaker 6: judges and friendly courts to do this, is this a
17:49
Speaker 6: version of lawfare where you say, we don't respect the people,
17:53
Speaker 6: we don't respect their vote, we don't respect who they
17:56
Speaker 6: chose as their leader, which this time happens to be
17:58
Speaker 6: President Donald J. Trump, And so therefore we are going
18:03
Speaker 6: to use lawfair to stop the will of the people
18:06
Speaker 6: and what they voted for, and what their leaders that
18:09
Speaker 6: they voted for, who won in a free and fair
18:11
Speaker 6: election are trying to do well.
18:13
Speaker 10: I hesitate to use the word lawfare here, Ben, because
18:15
Speaker 10: we do the same thing occasionally when there's Democrats in
18:19
Speaker 10: the White House. And it's not that we have a
18:21
Speaker 10: problem with challenging federal government edicts. Right, We as Republicans
18:26
Speaker 10: are are constantly finding ways that the federal government is
18:29
Speaker 10: overstepping its bounds, and we use the courts in order
18:32
Speaker 10: to rain them in, like in West Virginia versus EPA.
18:35
Speaker 2: Right.
18:35
Speaker 10: So it isn't that this is It isn't lawfare as
18:39
Speaker 10: you describe it, because we need the option to be
18:41
Speaker 10: able to do this too. It is the kind of lawfare,
18:44
Speaker 10: right it is. It is this this novel concept that
18:49
Speaker 10: you use a single friendly district court to do what
18:52
Speaker 10: is supposed to be the job of the entire judiciary.
18:54
Speaker 9: Right.
18:55
Speaker 10: There's a reason why our system has set up the
18:57
Speaker 10: way that it is. And I personally believe, as in
18:59
Speaker 10: the originalists, that the factual scenarios surrounding the reason why
19:05
Speaker 10: somebody's asking for something shouldn't change the fundamental role and
19:10
Speaker 10: the rules that surround our court, and that was really
19:13
Speaker 10: in essence, the main part of this argument is should
19:19
Speaker 10: we break the rules because this is important and my
19:22
Speaker 10: personal opinion is is that is not true. We should
19:25
Speaker 10: maintain the constitutionally granted powers that exist in our district
19:31
Speaker 10: courts and allow the system as it was created by
19:34
Speaker 10: our founders to work, because it does.
19:37
Speaker 4: Thank you for listening to the forty seven Morning Update
19:39
Speaker 4: with Ben Ferguson. Please make sure you hit subscribe wherever
19:44
Speaker 4: you're listening to this podcast right now and for more
19:47
Speaker 4: in depth news, also subscribe to the Ben Ferguson podcast
19:51
Speaker 4: and we will see you back here on Monday morning