Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Transgender Athlete Debate Goes Prime Time at SCOTUS

Transcript

Transgender Athlete Debate Goes Prime Time at SCOTUS · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: I spent the day in the United States Supreme Court
0:04
Speaker 1: to hear two cases, the oral arguments, and they deal with, honestly,
0:10
Speaker 1: a really incredible court case, I should say, cases that
0:15
Speaker 1: are going to decide the future of in essence, men
0:20
Speaker 1: claiming to be women in women's sports. Now, these cases
0:25
Speaker 1: are a couple that I've been actually working on for
0:28
Speaker 1: a while. One of these cases has come out of
0:30
Speaker 1: West Virginia. One of my old roommates is the attorney
0:34
Speaker 1: general from West Virginia, and it was also a personally
0:36
Speaker 1: fun day. Jamie mccusky, he is the Attorney general from there.
0:40
Speaker 1: He is going to actually be on our show tomorrow,
0:43
Speaker 1: but I was with him because his state is standing
0:46
Speaker 1: up for girls' sports.
0:47
Speaker 2: He has two daughters.
0:49
Speaker 1: It's important to him and it's something that they've led
0:51
Speaker 1: on in West Virginia. Now there are two cases, and
0:54
Speaker 1: I'm going to go through these, but I also want
0:56
Speaker 1: you to understand what a really interesting moment this was,
1:00
Speaker 1: like an interesting day it was when it comes to
1:04
Speaker 1: just seeing the moral difference between the two sides of
1:10
Speaker 1: this argument. Some of the most radical and extreme people
1:14
Speaker 1: I've ever been around were in the Supreme Court today,
1:17
Speaker 1: and obviously outside the transgender community.
1:20
Speaker 2: They are angry.
1:22
Speaker 1: They were screaming, they were dropping every curse word you
1:25
Speaker 1: could imagine. There were people riding on motorcycles with boomboxes,
1:30
Speaker 1: their speakers on with music that was blaring, saying f
1:35
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, for example. That is the anger and the
1:38
Speaker 1: hate coming from the LGBTQ plus activist community. The same
1:44
Speaker 1: people that say we just want you to tolerate our
1:46
Speaker 1: lifestyle that are completely intolerant to anyone that disagrees with them.
1:51
Speaker 1: Why should women be forced to compete or share locker
1:53
Speaker 1: rooms with dudes who have penises who are acting like
1:56
Speaker 1: a woman. Now, these court cases were all that's so
2:00
Speaker 1: interesting because if you've never been the Supreme Court, it's
2:02
Speaker 1: been gosh twenty years for me since I saw a
2:04
Speaker 1: Supreme Court case inside of the court room, and I
2:07
Speaker 1: felt it was important enough for me to be there
2:09
Speaker 1: for this, and not only to just encourage my good friend,
2:13
Speaker 1: my former roommate, and what he was doing, but also
2:17
Speaker 1: to just watch the justices and how they responded to this.
2:22
Speaker 1: I've said this before, I mean it today more than ever.
2:27
Speaker 1: If you think your vote doesn't matter in a presidential election,
2:30
Speaker 1: you're insane. You look at the makeup of the Supreme
2:32
Speaker 1: Court now, and the makeup of the Supreme Court is
2:35
Speaker 1: because of the hard work of getting conservatives elected to
2:39
Speaker 1: the White House, whether that's or W. Bush, whether that
2:43
Speaker 1: is Clarence Thomas, whether it's you know, Bush forty one.
2:47
Speaker 1: You look at Donald Trump. Donald Trump's administration when he
2:51
Speaker 1: was in office from sixteen to twenty literally changed the
2:53
Speaker 1: landscape of the Supreme Court to the point where now
2:57
Speaker 1: Democrats are going to pack the court every time they
2:59
Speaker 1: don't get.
3:00
Speaker 2: A decision that they demand.
3:03
Speaker 1: And so that's part of this that really is a
3:07
Speaker 1: conversation that we have to have about we have to
3:10
Speaker 1: fight extremely hard and pick the right candidate to run
3:14
Speaker 1: as the leader of the Republican Party, to make sure
3:17
Speaker 1: that we don't run like people like Mitt Romney. Because
3:20
Speaker 1: when Mitt Romney lost, look at what happened on the
3:23
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. Look at who the Democrats gone there. And
3:26
Speaker 1: I witnessed these radicals that have been put on by
3:30
Speaker 1: the the Obama, Biden Harris's of the world and their regimes.
3:35
Speaker 1: These are anarchists. So let me just set the stage
3:38
Speaker 1: for you so you understand. So you get the Supreme
3:40
Speaker 1: Court about two hours before the oral arguments take place,
3:45
Speaker 1: if you have a ticket and invite to go into
3:48
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. I was lucky enough to have one
3:50
Speaker 1: of those, so I had a guaranteed seed at the
3:52
Speaker 1: Supreme Court today. What you do is you get there,
3:55
Speaker 1: you check in, and you're either a member of the
3:59
Speaker 1: bar or a friend of the bar. I'm not a lawyer,
4:03
Speaker 1: so I would be classified as a friend of the bar,
4:05
Speaker 1: but I was able to. You walk straight up with
4:07
Speaker 1: a ticket, You got to lock your cell phone in
4:09
Speaker 1: a locker, you take your key, you go through all
4:11
Speaker 1: the security, and then you go into the Supreme Court
4:13
Speaker 1: and they escort.
4:15
Speaker 2: You to where you're going to see be seated.
4:17
Speaker 1: Now, I was seen on the basically the outside of
4:20
Speaker 1: an or the inside of an aisle. I had a
4:22
Speaker 1: great seat where I could see all of the Supreme
4:25
Speaker 1: Court very clearly, really from the middle of the room.
4:28
Speaker 1: And then what you have is you have people that
4:30
Speaker 1: are are guests of the court cases and the attorneys
4:33
Speaker 1: that are there. Uh. And so there was two different cases.
4:37
Speaker 1: The Supreme Court was hearing the oral arguments for a day.
4:39
Speaker 1: The first one that came up was a case little
4:42
Speaker 1: the Hayecox. So it was a challenge, So you understand
4:47
Speaker 1: the background of this to an Idaho state law that
4:51
Speaker 1: bans transgender girls and women from playing on girls or
4:56
Speaker 1: women's sports teams. Now, this was a case that was
5:00
Speaker 1: so important for the future of this country because they said,
5:04
Speaker 1: if you are a biological man acting like you're a woman,
5:08
Speaker 1: we say no to you playing in women or girls' sports. Right,
5:11
Speaker 1: seems sane, but you have to understand the radical extremists
5:16
Speaker 1: of the left and these freaks. They went all the
5:19
Speaker 1: way to Supreme Court. They want to mandate that your
5:22
Speaker 1: daughters share a bathroom, a locker room, and a sports
5:25
Speaker 1: team with a man with a peace That is what
5:28
Speaker 1: they want to mandate. They want to put you into
5:31
Speaker 1: submission where you cannot keep your daughter safe or your
5:35
Speaker 1: grandchild safe. They're also putting these girls' lives at risk,
5:39
Speaker 1: not just from attacks, and we've witnessed these attacks in
5:42
Speaker 1: these locker rooms, and we're talking about psychical as thoughts,
5:44
Speaker 1: et cetera. We have seen women that have been hurt
5:47
Speaker 1: in boxing, for example, that was an Olympic controversy where
5:51
Speaker 1: men were winning the medals because they acted like they
5:54
Speaker 1: were women. We have seen women that have been hurt
5:57
Speaker 1: in volleyball, for example, with even at the high school level,
6:01
Speaker 1: where men acting like women spiked the ball so hard
6:04
Speaker 1: it shattered the face the nose of some of their competitors.
6:09
Speaker 1: We have witnessed women be hurt in major injuries on
6:12
Speaker 1: the soccer field. In fact, virtually every contact sport soccer, basketball, volleyball,
6:18
Speaker 1: the list goes on. Where these incompetent imbeciles allow men
6:24
Speaker 1: who act like women to compete, women get hurt. Now,
6:29
Speaker 1: you would think that this would have been like the
6:31
Speaker 1: feminists movement would have shut this down, I would say
6:36
Speaker 1: years ago. They have not, because when you start redefining
6:40
Speaker 1: what is a man or a woman and then the
6:42
Speaker 1: LGBTQIA plus plus plus community does what they do, where
6:46
Speaker 1: do you stop including these people that are completely psychotic.
6:51
Speaker 1: That's why we are now at the Supreme Court. That
6:54
Speaker 1: is why this case was such an important case. So
6:57
Speaker 1: case one, there was a core egal question in this
7:01
Speaker 1: case coming out of Idaho, whether state bands like the
7:05
Speaker 1: one they have violated the equal Protection Clause of the
7:10
Speaker 1: Constitution or Title nine, the federal law barring sex discrimination
7:16
Speaker 1: in education.
7:18
Speaker 2: Now, why this matters is really simple.
7:21
Speaker 1: If this case is upheld, the decision could validate similar
7:25
Speaker 1: bands in more than two dozen other states. If it
7:29
Speaker 1: struck down, it could roll back laws restricting transgender youth
7:32
Speaker 1: participation in school athletics. That's pretty significant. I want to
7:39
Speaker 1: also just paint a picture for you with this first case.
7:42
Speaker 1: It was very clear from the beginning when there was
7:45
Speaker 1: the opening statements that the liberal judges Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson,
7:53
Speaker 1: they were ready to go and chomping the bit.
7:58
Speaker 2: What was also interesting, that's usually pretty.
8:00
Speaker 1: Quiet Clarence Thomas. He actually asked the very first question
8:05
Speaker 1: this morning, but it wasn't some significant it was more
8:07
Speaker 1: of a clarification question. And then you saw, uh, Atlanta,
8:13
Speaker 1: Kagan and sodomor Or was definitely the lead on this,
8:15
Speaker 1: and then Jackson was kind of third.
8:18
Speaker 2: Kagan was kind of second.
8:19
Speaker 1: But what you saw from Stomoor was she was upset
8:23
Speaker 1: and clearly invisibly frustrated that there was even a chance
8:29
Speaker 1: to say no to men and women's sports.
8:32
Speaker 2: Now, she's a feminist.
8:34
Speaker 1: I don't know why women, especially liberal women in this country,
8:37
Speaker 1: like feminist women in this country, would not immediately run
8:41
Speaker 1: forward and said, no way in hell are men going
8:43
Speaker 1: to ruin women's sports and abuse women, right, because feminists
8:47
Speaker 1: are supposed to be about stopping abuse of women by
8:49
Speaker 1: these evil men. Well, these are the most evil men
8:52
Speaker 1: I've ever seen. They're beating the hell out of women
8:55
Speaker 1: and stealing their accolades and their scholarships and their places
9:00
Speaker 1: on the podium.
9:01
Speaker 2: But this is.
9:02
Speaker 1: Why I say that liberalism is genuinely a disease, because
9:07
Speaker 1: when they have a chance to stand by what they
9:09
Speaker 1: believe in, they don't do it. And there's a part
9:12
Speaker 1: of me that's like, of course they don't, because I'm
9:14
Speaker 1: not even sure they know why they believe what they believe.
9:17
Speaker 1: So you look at sight of my orb, and she's
9:20
Speaker 1: angry on a couple of different points. Number one, she's
9:24
Speaker 1: angry that there is not enough and this is very clear.
9:29
Speaker 2: Early in the arguments.
9:31
Speaker 1: Enough transgendered children to justify changing of a law based
9:37
Speaker 1: on the percentage of people that are transgendered. Now, there
9:41
Speaker 1: are several million people that identify as transgender in this country.
9:43
Speaker 1: The problem is the majority of them are actually adults
9:46
Speaker 1: that do this, not children. And so you can't just
9:50
Speaker 1: constantly be changing laws based on somebody that decides that
9:54
Speaker 1: they want to, like, you know, believe in some ridiculous
9:57
Speaker 1: or absurd thing, and the court understands that. Otherwise you would
10:01
Speaker 1: never have like rules and laws because they'd always be
10:04
Speaker 1: changing all the time based on what some crazy person
10:06
Speaker 1: sides to do. And so what was clear from Alena
10:10
Speaker 1: Kagan early on was is she was trying to, in essence,
10:13
Speaker 1: I think, advocate for parents to hurry up and transgender
10:18
Speaker 1: their kids at a younger age like two, three, four, five,
10:20
Speaker 1: and six, so that then they can say, there is
10:23
Speaker 1: enough people that identify as being the opposite sex of
10:26
Speaker 1: what their birth sex is, right their biological sex, so
10:31
Speaker 1: that we can then mandate that any child that wants
10:35
Speaker 1: to be somebody else can be that person in sports,
10:38
Speaker 1: and we must accommodate them. The problem is, right now
10:41
Speaker 1: there's not enough children that are doing this, and so
10:44
Speaker 1: what I was watching from I think Kagan and certainly
10:47
Speaker 1: side of my ORB, was a call to arms of
10:50
Speaker 1: like of parents to like, hurry up and get your
10:54
Speaker 1: kids transitioning younger, so that we can count them and say,
10:59
Speaker 1: instead of this being an asterisk like zero point zero
11:02
Speaker 1: zero zero one percent of children identify as trans we
11:05
Speaker 1: can get to a full percent.
11:08
Speaker 2: And then when we get to a full percent.
11:12
Speaker 1: We can then do what we really want to do,
11:14
Speaker 1: which is really screw these kids up and completely and
11:16
Speaker 1: utterly changed society with the children where they think it's
11:20
Speaker 1: normal to be trans gendered, and that's how you change
11:24
Speaker 1: the culture. Now, the good news is in this first
11:28
Speaker 1: argument there was also a second argument on Title nine,
11:32
Speaker 1: like which is you know, discrimination and women and sports, yah, YadA?
11:36
Speaker 2: Is this fall into that.
11:38
Speaker 1: I think it was pretty clear early on that both
11:41
Speaker 1: sides I'll agree that the Title nine argument was a
11:44
Speaker 1: bad one and it wasn't going to change with the
11:47
Speaker 1: Supreme Court.
11:48
Speaker 2: That's good news.
11:50
Speaker 1: I also think it was interesting to see in the
11:52
Speaker 1: first argument how the Democrats, the the hardcore liberals on
11:56
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, the radical feminists on the Supreme Court,
12:00
Speaker 1: as I mentioned all three of their names a moment ago,
12:03
Speaker 1: they ran out of steam quickly and anger quickly, which
12:08
Speaker 1: was a huge opportunity moving into case number two. Now,
12:12
Speaker 1: Case number two a little bit different. It was a
12:15
Speaker 1: challenge to a West Virginia law. The case was West
12:18
Speaker 1: Virginia versus the Initials of a Child B P J.
12:22
Speaker 1: All Right, it was a West Virginia had a law
12:26
Speaker 1: that that basically it bars transgender girls from girls sports.
12:31
Speaker 2: Teams, meaning dudes actinglink chicks.
12:34
Speaker 1: There was a quote transgender student athlete by the name
12:37
Speaker 1: of Becky Pepper Jackson who want to compete in girls
12:39
Speaker 1: track and field.
12:41
Speaker 2: Becky's a dude acting like a chick. Okay.
12:43
Speaker 1: The the legal issue was just like the first case,
12:47
Speaker 1: little the he cocks uh this quo, This case actually
12:51
Speaker 1: centered on whether Title nine and the Equal Protection Clause
12:55
Speaker 1: allows or prohibits states from categorizing sports teams based solely
12:59
Speaker 1: on biolog sex at birth. Now, if we lived in
13:02
Speaker 1: the same same world, you could answer this question without
13:06
Speaker 1: going to Supreme Court. We've had women's sports for a
13:09
Speaker 1: long time. We've had men's sports for a long time.
13:11
Speaker 1: There's a reason why men and women are very very different.
13:15
Speaker 2: Men have at.
13:16
Speaker 1: The ability and the power that women do not have
13:21
Speaker 1: in many different sports. And if you don't believe me,
13:23
Speaker 1: I don't. I can't fix stupid. Okay, I can give
13:26
Speaker 1: you examples a great examples the of O the day
13:28
Speaker 1: you had Nick Kirios, who's been injured out of professional
13:32
Speaker 1: tennis for a while. He's ranked I don't know, six
13:33
Speaker 1: hundred nine hundred the world's ththning. Crazy played the number
13:36
Speaker 1: one woman in the world. They made the side of
13:38
Speaker 1: the court he hit into smaller, made the line smaller,
13:42
Speaker 1: and he still beat the crap out of her. Does
13:44
Speaker 1: that mean she's a bad tennis player the number one
13:46
Speaker 1: women since play in the world. No, she's a woman.
13:48
Speaker 1: There's a difference between men and women. By the way,
13:50
Speaker 1: women are prettier than men. Why, I don't know, God
13:53
Speaker 1: meant it that way, but men cannot compete with women
13:55
Speaker 1: on beauty. That's just the way it is, like there
13:58
Speaker 1: are pluses and minuses. One women's sennis player is phenomenal,
14:02
Speaker 1: but she had no chance to beat somebody that's at
14:05
Speaker 1: the end of their career, not the peak of their career.
14:07
Speaker 1: On the men's side, we've seen this with the Williams
14:10
Speaker 1: sisters when they played a double specialist who is a
14:13
Speaker 1: German guy that was ranked I don't know, six hundred
14:15
Speaker 1: something in the world or whatever it was, and he
14:17
Speaker 1: beat the crap out of both of them.
14:18
Speaker 2: He smoked like a pack of day.
14:21
Speaker 1: There's just a difference, and the idea that we have
14:24
Speaker 1: to even debate this now is insane. However, we have
14:28
Speaker 1: a lot of data which was brought up in the
14:31
Speaker 1: Supreme Court today, there's a difference when it comes to
14:35
Speaker 1: the strength, the wingspan, the height. The list goes on
14:38
Speaker 1: and on, and they talked about even if you do
14:40
Speaker 1: testosterome like estrogen and blockers of testosterum, and you get
14:45
Speaker 1: the and you do all the things. Even when you're
14:48
Speaker 1: doing all the things that doctors say you can do
14:50
Speaker 1: that quote make you be more like a woman, still
14:53
Speaker 1: about seventy five percent of those that go through those
14:56
Speaker 1: hormone treatment therapies are not in the range that is
15:00
Speaker 1: actually equal to a woman, meaning that even when you're
15:04
Speaker 1: trying to suppress it of men to make them like women,
15:08
Speaker 1: seven point five men out of ten who act like
15:11
Speaker 1: a woman still have an advantage over the women when
15:15
Speaker 1: they're taking the suppression medication. So now you're talking about
15:19
Speaker 1: a subset is like twenty.
15:21
Speaker 2: Five percent, Well, then you still have a problem.
15:22
Speaker 1: If that man went through puberty, he's going to have
15:25
Speaker 1: an advantage for the rest of his life over women. Now,
15:29
Speaker 1: this goes back to the recruitment aspect of this that
15:31
Speaker 1: we were talking about with side of my oar.
15:32
Speaker 2: What side of my R is saying is, look, you
15:34
Speaker 2: need to start these kids at the age of.
15:37
Speaker 1: Two and three, and then we have an argument where
15:39
Speaker 1: we could win on this. Now, the key arguments of
15:43
Speaker 1: the plaintiffs and these transgender athletes is also very interesting,
15:46
Speaker 1: all right, and this is what the argument's focused on.
15:48
Speaker 1: Attorneys argued that Idaho and West Virgina bands quote, unlawfully
15:53
Speaker 1: discriminated against transgendered students and deny then the educational and
15:57
Speaker 1: health benefits of participating in.
15:58
Speaker 2: School of sports. That is, if you are a dude,
16:02
Speaker 2: you can compete with dudes.
16:04
Speaker 1: If you're really young, by the way, you can compete
16:05
Speaker 1: co ed sports. If you are a chick, you can
16:08
Speaker 1: compete with chicks. No one's being denied. You're only denied
16:12
Speaker 1: when you tell me that you're the opposite sex of
16:14
Speaker 1: what you actually are. And really, if you're a chick,
16:18
Speaker 1: by the way, that wants to be a dude, will
16:19
Speaker 1: let you play with the dudes. A lot of people
16:21
Speaker 1: don't talk about that, why because no one's worried about
16:23
Speaker 1: them taking the spot of some dude. This really only
16:26
Speaker 1: applies to the blatant discrimination of actual women when we
16:30
Speaker 1: allow men to act like women and to play in
16:32
Speaker 1: their sports. And these transittered activists at the Supreme Court
16:38
Speaker 1: were completely and utterly insane when it came to this issue.
16:44
Speaker 2: They want to beat us all into suppression. Now.
16:47
Speaker 1: They also countered that Title nine interprets interpreted in lon
16:52
Speaker 1: of recent federal guidance protects. They say transgender students from
16:56
Speaker 1: exclusion based on gender identity. They're not excluded. Just be
17:01
Speaker 1: your biological sex and you are not excluded. You want
17:04
Speaker 1: special treatment under the law because you're crazy. And I
17:09
Speaker 1: have compassion for anybody that believes are trapped in the
17:11
Speaker 1: opposite body of what they actually are the sex of
17:13
Speaker 1: buy there, and I have massive compassion for them. But
17:15
Speaker 1: you're not a victim. You're trying to force everybody else
17:18
Speaker 1: to go along with your insanity. And who you're the
17:22
Speaker 1: real victims here are the girls who are now forced
17:26
Speaker 1: to be in a locker room with a man with
17:28
Speaker 1: a penis, to play sports with a man with the
17:30
Speaker 1: penis and has an unfair advantage over them. Also, the
17:34
Speaker 1: Planoff said that there was no evidence that inclusive policies
17:38
Speaker 1: harm have they described it sis gender girls' sports.
17:42
Speaker 2: That is also a lie. Let's go to the evidence.
17:46
Speaker 1: And this was something that the Supreme Court justice is
17:49
Speaker 1: really honed in on in a really special way. I
17:53
Speaker 1: was so thankful to watch the conservative justices asking these
17:58
Speaker 1: specific questions of okay, is their harm to girls by
18:02
Speaker 1: allowing men in women's sports. The answer is yes, just
18:07
Speaker 1: based on how easily men who say they're women succeed
18:15
Speaker 1: in women's sports. We've seen this in swimming and the
18:19
Speaker 1: swimming title that went to a dude acting like a
18:22
Speaker 1: chick that the year before was swimming on a dude's
18:24
Speaker 1: team and wasn't good enough to win with men. So
18:30
Speaker 1: then he said, all right, I'll become a chick and
18:32
Speaker 1: I'm going to stand and win the NCAA championship, taking
18:35
Speaker 1: away from an actual woman. Now that woman you may
18:40
Speaker 1: know her is Riley Gaines. Riley Gaines has been at
18:43
Speaker 1: the forefront. She was by the way in DC for
18:46
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court hearings on this today as well. She's
18:48
Speaker 1: been leading the way to protect women's sports because she
18:51
Speaker 1: should have been the reigning NCAA champion and they stole
18:54
Speaker 1: it from her and gave it to a man the
18:59
Speaker 1: level at which and I wish you had the data
19:01
Speaker 1: because they don't, and I'll grab it and we'll talk
19:05
Speaker 1: about this more with the Attorney General tomorrow of West
19:08
Speaker 1: Virginia But what was interesting is the data.
19:12
Speaker 2: The data is.
19:14
Speaker 1: Overwhelming evidence that when you allow a man to compete
19:18
Speaker 1: with women, they rise to the top.
19:22
Speaker 2: There are very.
19:24
Speaker 1: Few men acting like women in NCAA sports, but the
19:28
Speaker 1: ones that do compete, they steal countless victories and become
19:36
Speaker 1: the best, the best because they're a man competing with women.
19:39
Speaker 2: There is a difference.
19:41
Speaker 1: And so what was really interesting is to watch the
19:43
Speaker 1: conservatives that were out there on this court ask the
19:47
Speaker 1: right questions of like, well, is there harm being done
19:50
Speaker 1: to women disproportionately, Like when you throw a man in
19:52
Speaker 1: women's sports, or a man that thinks they're a woman,
19:55
Speaker 1: or says there a woman in women's sports, what happens
19:57
Speaker 1: is it proportionally? They went at the same level the
20:00
Speaker 1: answers no, and they came back with incredible data showing
20:05
Speaker 1: that like when men compete with women, how the percentage
20:09
Speaker 1: at which they win titles matches, when tournaments win championships
20:15
Speaker 1: is just like it's like nine percent of the time
20:20
Speaker 1: because there's a difference between men and women, and men
20:23
Speaker 1: have a mass advantage over women. Now, even men that
20:27
Speaker 1: are competing with puberty blockers and given estrogen and all
20:32
Speaker 1: the crap, that they say somehow makes it fair. Guess
20:34
Speaker 1: what happens, They still win like nine nine percent of
20:37
Speaker 1: the time because they already have the advantage of being
20:40
Speaker 1: taller and bigger and having a bigger wingspan and being
20:44
Speaker 1: you know, successful in a sport that they're really good at.
20:46
Speaker 2: This.
20:47
Speaker 1: Again, you go back to the NCA swimming Championships. Look
20:49
Speaker 1: at the Olympics for example. There wasn't like a hundred
20:52
Speaker 1: transgendent athletes in the Olympics, but the transgundent athletes that
20:56
Speaker 1: did compete, they were winning all the medals. Boxing is
21:00
Speaker 1: a great example of that. You have a man who
21:04
Speaker 1: got through puberty and like, well he's got the same
21:07
Speaker 1: estrogen now levels as a woman. It doesn't matter. He
21:09
Speaker 1: beat the crap out of women, could have killed women.
21:11
Speaker 1: I'm not exaggerating when I say that brutally beat the
21:14
Speaker 1: hell out of women and gets to win medals.
21:18
Speaker 2: How is that fair? And so the takeaway.
21:22
Speaker 1: From all of this that I think is the most
21:24
Speaker 1: important part here is number one. The state lawyers and
21:29
Speaker 1: supporting briefs emphasize that policymakers have historically separated teams by
21:36
Speaker 1: biological sex to protect opportunities for girls and women. That's
21:40
Speaker 1: why the feminist should have been on board with this.
21:43
Speaker 1: They argue that states have authority under Title nigh to
21:46
Speaker 1: limit team eligibility to biological females for competitive fairness and
21:51
Speaker 1: also for safety reasons. Now early indications, from what I
21:57
Speaker 1: witness in these oral arguments, I think it's pretty clear
22:00
Speaker 1: that the conservative majority on the Court may be sympathetic
22:04
Speaker 1: to the states arguments and inclined to uphold the Idaho
22:08
Speaker 1: and West Virginia law.
22:09
Speaker 2: Is because they're not crazy.
22:12
Speaker 1: The ACLU advocacy group, they were there all right, and
22:16
Speaker 1: they held rallies, and they framed the cases the historic
22:18
Speaker 1: civil rights battles. This is not civil rights, and I
22:21
Speaker 1: think Martin Luther King would agree with me. They emphasized
22:24
Speaker 1: the harm is just brutal towards the transgender community, and
22:30
Speaker 1: I would argue that's also a lie. They say, well,
22:33
Speaker 1: it's an excruciating law for transgender youth.
22:37
Speaker 2: There aren't that many transgender youth. They need to calm down.
22:39
Speaker 1: But of course you understand, when you don't get your way,
22:42
Speaker 1: the best way to get your way is scream racist,
22:43
Speaker 1: big at homophobes MFO.
22:45
Speaker 2: The list goes on and on.
22:47
Speaker 1: Outside the Court. You also had what I refer to
22:50
Speaker 1: as the Soros campaign. You had political lefties that were
22:54
Speaker 1: out there. You had a lot of people weighing in.
22:58
Speaker 1: You had all the LGBTQ IA plus plus plus plus
23:03
Speaker 1: community out there. They were saying, this is exclusion, it's discriminatory,
23:07
Speaker 1: it's harmful to students well being. And they say that
23:10
Speaker 1: if you don't let dudes who act like chicks playing
23:12
Speaker 1: women's sports, they're going to commit suicide at higher levels.
23:14
Speaker 2: The list goes on on.
23:16
Speaker 1: They put it gun to your head in their base,
23:17
Speaker 1: like if you disagree with this, people are going to die.
23:20
Speaker 2: And so that's what you need to understand. Now. The
23:23
Speaker 2: Justices do not issue a ruling.
23:26
Speaker 1: It will probably come in Juni or July, after the
23:29
Speaker 1: oral arguments, they deliberate, They then release opinions in the
23:32
Speaker 1: coming weeks or months. It's probably going to be from
23:35
Speaker 1: what I was told today from insights in the Supreme
23:37
Speaker 1: Court Junior July before we get the response to this.
23:40
Speaker 1: The outcome is significant because not only will it affect
23:43
Speaker 1: the application of Title nine, but also state authority over
23:47
Speaker 1: student athlete eligibility across the country. These are very significant cases.
23:55
Speaker 1: It's also about Are we going to be insane? Are
24:02
Speaker 1: we going to be a SAE nation, a nation where
24:05
Speaker 1: we say women deserve to be protected and cherished? Or
24:11
Speaker 1: do we live in a country where we're the opposite
24:14
Speaker 1: of that? Is it the opposite where we say no, no, no,
24:18
Speaker 1: We're going to be insane. We're going to be radicals,
24:21
Speaker 1: We're going to be extreme. We are going to be
24:25
Speaker 1: a country where we are so far gone to a
24:29
Speaker 1: woke left that we are going to harm women just
24:33
Speaker 1: for the sake of this LGBTQIA radical agenda. I also
24:40
Speaker 1: go back to what I witnessed on the Supreme Court,
24:43
Speaker 1: and it was again shocking advocacy from Sodomayor, and Kagan
24:48
Speaker 1: was with her and Jackson as well, but Satamora was
24:51
Speaker 1: the leader on this. What Sodomayor is saying is we're
24:55
Speaker 1: probably going to lose. That's what she was hinting at,
24:59
Speaker 1: while also the same time make it clear that more
25:02
Speaker 1: parents need to force their kids into being transgendered at
25:07
Speaker 1: a much earlier age so that we can then make
25:10
Speaker 1: the argument that we need to protect two and three
25:12
Speaker 1: and four year olds from being bullied when they're going
25:14
Speaker 1: through transition. And there's a large enough community that we
25:16
Speaker 1: need to change the laws to protect them because the
25:19
Speaker 1: community is so small now we need to get bigger, quicker.
25:22
Speaker 2: That is so sick.
25:24
Speaker 1: When that happened, I was looking around the courtroom, like,
25:27
Speaker 1: did everyone else hear what I just heard from the
25:29
Speaker 1: Supreme Court justice? And it goes back to my core
25:32
Speaker 1: point that I'll start with. I started with. If you
25:36
Speaker 1: think that your vote doesn't matter in a presential election,
25:38
Speaker 1: if you think the presdential election doesn't matter, you have
25:40
Speaker 1: lost your mind. You look at the Supreme Court today
25:44
Speaker 1: and thank goodness Donald Trump one in sixteen because it's like,
25:50
Speaker 1: when you witness moments like this, you understand just how
25:54
Speaker 1: important it is. When you see moments like today, you
25:57
Speaker 1: understand just how important it is that we have people
26:02
Speaker 1: on the Supreme Court that aren't lunatics, that aren't psychotic individuals.
26:09
Speaker 1: These elections matter because these people sit for a life
26:13
Speaker 1: time appointment, not five years, not ten years, at fifteen,
26:19
Speaker 1: a lifetime and when they're there they can just do
26:23
Speaker 1: whatever they want, which is why the vetting process.
26:26
Speaker 2: Is also so vitally important.
26:30
Speaker 1: The part of this is everything you make a mistake
26:35
Speaker 1: and you put the wrong justice on the Supreme Court.
26:37
Speaker 1: God help us what happens afterwards. So I'll say this again,
26:42
Speaker 1: this is a huge moment for our country. I think
26:46
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court is going to get it right. And
26:48
Speaker 1: if they get it right, God bless them. It's the
26:52
Speaker 1: reason why I voted for Donald Trump again because there's
26:55
Speaker 1: a good chance he's going to appoint somebody else at
26:56
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. And if he does, I want to
27:00
Speaker 1: know it's a constitutional and conservative, not a radical lefty
27:02
Speaker 1: who's just deciding to change laws whenever they don't get
27:06
Speaker 1: their way, and do it in a way that harms
27:09
Speaker 1: children from mutilation, like we're supposed to be protecting children,
27:12
Speaker 1: not advocating for body mutilation, the cutting off of generalism, breasts,
27:17
Speaker 1: like the people that make money off these kids are
27:19
Speaker 1: the most devious, sickest people I've ever seen, and I
27:24
Speaker 1: looked at them in the eye today a Supreme Court.
27:26
Speaker 1: This is a battle of good and evil, and we
27:31
Speaker 1: better get it right, folks, because if we don't, there
27:34
Speaker 1: are children that will die because of it, and be
27:36
Speaker 1: mutilated because of it, and will commit suicide because of it.
27:40
Speaker 2: Don't forget.
27:40
Speaker 1: If you like the show, listen every day download this podcast,
27:44
Speaker 1: Hit that auto download button, the subscribe button, and please
27:47
Speaker 1: share it on social media so other people hear about it.
27:49
Speaker 2: And I'll talk to you again tomorrow