Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / DEMOCRATS NOW WANT TO TRADE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY for the Trump family, in a new offer for both sides to walk away from criminal prosecution!

Transcript

DEMOCRATS NOW WANT TO TRADE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY for the Trump family, in a new offer for both sides to walk away from criminal prosecution! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: Well, this is interesting. Democrats are now floating an idea,
0:05
Speaker 1: an opportunity, a possibility, and that is, we won't get
0:09
Speaker 1: your guy, Donald Trump if you don't get our guy
0:13
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. In fact, there was a political article under
0:18
Speaker 1: their Law and Order section. I kid you not that
0:23
Speaker 1: also is under their opinion under law and order, because
0:26
Speaker 1: that's the thing apparently now, and the headline reads this
0:30
Speaker 1: way the real reason Trump and Hunter Biden might not
0:34
Speaker 1: get indicted. Prosecutors aren't robots. They have wide discretion when
0:40
Speaker 1: it comes deciding whether to indict someone, which is also
0:43
Speaker 1: tells you just how weird are legal system is and
0:47
Speaker 1: how corrupt. I would even argue our legal system is.
0:50
Speaker 1: You shouldn't have why discretion. If you break the law,
0:53
Speaker 1: and the law is clear, then you should be indicted.
0:54
Speaker 1: I don't care what party you're in. That's just the
0:57
Speaker 1: way it should work. But this attorney and former federal
1:01
Speaker 1: prosecutor is a Politico magazine contributing editor, and he's writing basically,
1:06
Speaker 1: you scratch our back and al scratchers, and maybe all
1:10
Speaker 1: this would just go away. These are boom times for
1:13
Speaker 1: the country's armchair prosecutors. He writes every day seems to
1:17
Speaker 1: bring some fresh new possibility or development in a high
1:21
Speaker 1: profile criminal investigation, along with the opportunity to speculate about
1:26
Speaker 1: whether a major public figure will wind up in actual prison.
1:30
Speaker 1: Most of the time these days we're talking about Donald Trump,
1:33
Speaker 1: which by the way, is a lie. That's not true.
1:35
Speaker 1: The media is talking about him, but the average American
1:37
Speaker 1: is not talking about him. But again, this just shows
1:40
Speaker 1: you how liberal Politico is. But of course he says.
1:43
Speaker 1: The current president's son, Hunter Biden, is also under federal
1:47
Speaker 1: criminal investigation, and that has generated similar questions about how
1:52
Speaker 1: the investigation will be resolved. Much of this commentary, however,
1:58
Speaker 1: has relied on mechanistic accounts of how federal prosecutors operate
2:03
Speaker 1: in complex cases, an assumption that if there is sufficient
2:08
Speaker 1: evidence of a crime, then it will or at least should,
2:12
Speaker 1: be prosecuted. Obviously, we know that's not true because Hunter
2:15
Speaker 1: Biden's been walking around a freeman for how long? And
2:18
Speaker 1: no one's ever rated any of the Biden properties, including
2:22
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's. That's incomplete, the author says, at best, and
2:27
Speaker 1: misleading it worse. The result has been a widespread oversimplification
2:31
Speaker 1: of the questions that Attorney General Merrick Garland and the
2:36
Speaker 1: prosecutors working on these investigations will need to confront and
2:40
Speaker 1: the distinct possibility that one way or another, many people
2:45
Speaker 1: will be confused or disappointed if their preferred target is
2:50
Speaker 1: not ultimately indicted. Now you know it's where he's going
2:52
Speaker 1: with us. He's basically going for a quid pro quo.
2:54
Speaker 1: We want indict your guy if you don't indict my guy,
2:57
Speaker 1: And maybe that's what should happen in all this, and
3:00
Speaker 1: we just all go home. No one goes to jail. Now,
3:05
Speaker 1: I'm gonna hit pause in this political article because I
3:08
Speaker 1: want to go back to the difference and compare it
3:12
Speaker 1: for you between Donald Trump, which they're basically trying to
3:15
Speaker 1: implies exactly the same, and he's as much hot water
3:18
Speaker 1: as Hunter Biden, James Biden, Joe Biden are in which
3:23
Speaker 1: is a total lie. And I'm gonna play this audio
3:25
Speaker 1: for you in just a second of the man who
3:27
Speaker 1: got all this started, the guy who owned the Mac
3:31
Speaker 1: shop in Delaware, the guy who got the Hunter Biden
3:35
Speaker 1: laptop when Hunter Biden never came back to pick it up.
3:39
Speaker 1: Before I play that for you, I want to remind
3:40
Speaker 1: you about our friends over at Patriot Mobile Patriot Mobile
3:44
Speaker 1: is America's only conservative mobile phone provider. They use the
3:49
Speaker 1: same towers that your current cell phone runs off of,
3:52
Speaker 1: so you get amazing nationwide coverage and you get to
3:55
Speaker 1: save money. But here's the real reason why I want
3:58
Speaker 1: you to switch to Patriot Mobile. It is because they
4:01
Speaker 1: take a portion of every bill you pay and they
4:04
Speaker 1: use that money to fund conservative causes, conservative candidates who
4:09
Speaker 1: believe in the sanctity of life, freedom of speech, and
4:13
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment, and they are winning. If you're ready
4:16
Speaker 1: to make a difference with every phone call, you need
4:19
Speaker 1: to check out Patriot Mobile. They have affordable plans for you,
4:22
Speaker 1: for your family, and even for your business. They offer
4:26
Speaker 1: the same nationwide coverage that you are using right now
4:30
Speaker 1: if the same cell phone towers. Make the switch and
4:33
Speaker 1: make a difference every day. Go to Patriot Mobile dot com,
4:37
Speaker 1: slash ferguson, Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson, or call
4:44
Speaker 1: them right now and you'll get free activation with a
4:47
Speaker 1: promo code ferguson nine seven to Patriot that's nine seven
4:52
Speaker 1: two Patriot. Now, let me play for you. The man
4:57
Speaker 1: who found Hunter Biden's laptop and the reason why this
5:01
Speaker 1: is out of he was in Wilmington, Delaware. He explains
5:04
Speaker 1: why he called the authorities when he realized what was
5:09
Speaker 1: on this mac mcpro when it was not picked up
5:12
Speaker 1: by Hunter Biden, because mainly on Burisma. It was what
5:15
Speaker 1: was in the news at the time. It was what
5:16
Speaker 1: I felt from what I initially seen during the recovery,
5:19
Speaker 1: that this was the criminal activity. There was members of
5:23
Speaker 1: Congress that were investigating Hunter Biden and his activities with Burisma.
5:28
Speaker 1: I felt like this was the most pertinent information, even
5:30
Speaker 1: though there was a ton of information, twenty something thousand emails.
5:35
Speaker 1: I wanted to keep my blinders on, get through the porn,
5:37
Speaker 1: get through the drugs, and focus in on what I
5:39
Speaker 1: thought was the biggest concern, where the Ukrainian people were
5:43
Speaker 1: invaded and the Biden family capitalized on it. And this
5:48
Speaker 1: was all being run out of the office of the
5:52
Speaker 1: Vice President. And that's not we don't elect our officials
5:56
Speaker 1: in this type of capacity to further their families fortune. Yeah,
6:04
Speaker 1: it is. It is detrimental to the United States that
6:08
Speaker 1: it seems to me, and it seems a lot of
6:10
Speaker 1: people that have heard your story that some people are
6:14
Speaker 1: above the law and others are not. You know, some
6:17
Speaker 1: people get a pass and others, you know, get thrown
6:22
Speaker 1: in jail. I mean, if this laptop had been mine,
6:26
Speaker 1: I'd be in jail, John Paul, I would be. I
6:29
Speaker 1: think that the things that are on here concern us
6:32
Speaker 1: over national security, shady payments, things that make us question
6:39
Speaker 1: why would Joe Biden do the things that he's doing
6:41
Speaker 1: right now as president unless he has compromised I mean honestly,
6:48
Speaker 1: but those are things that are legitimate questions based on
6:52
Speaker 1: what we know from the laptop that you looked at,
6:55
Speaker 1: right absolutely. I mean, there was a Chinese operative that
6:59
Speaker 1: were very very closely with Hunter and spent almost all
7:04
Speaker 1: of twenty eighteen trying to convince Hunter to convince his
7:07
Speaker 1: dad to run. Provided opt intel on the Trunk campaign,
7:13
Speaker 1: opposition intel on the Trunk campaign delivered from China two
7:16
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. It's this is not this is not the
7:21
Speaker 1: family that we should have in that in the Oval office.
7:26
Speaker 1: I play that for you to remind you that while
7:30
Speaker 1: Politico and the left is trying to sell you on
7:34
Speaker 1: this story, all right, and their story is a very
7:37
Speaker 1: clear story, it's a very obvious story that they're trying
7:41
Speaker 1: to sell you, which is okay, Donald Trump is in
7:44
Speaker 1: so much trouble legally that he should go to jail
7:48
Speaker 1: for a very long time. In fact, he's in as
7:50
Speaker 1: much trouble, if not more trouble than Joe or James
7:56
Speaker 1: or Hunter Biden. So now they're selling you this idea. Yeah, look,
8:00
Speaker 1: Republicans are coming. They believe now, and you can tell
8:04
Speaker 1: from this article from Politico that they think that there
8:07
Speaker 1: is going to be a change in the House. At
8:10
Speaker 1: the bare minimum right there, we may not have a
8:12
Speaker 1: change in power in the Senate, but there's a decent
8:15
Speaker 1: chance that that could happen. But there's it's it seems
8:18
Speaker 1: very clear Republicans are going to regain control of the
8:22
Speaker 1: House as long as we all show up and we
8:25
Speaker 1: all vote. And so now they're trying to hedge their bets.
8:29
Speaker 1: The argument is now this, Hey, guys, will let you
8:34
Speaker 1: have Hunter Biden and we'll let you have you know,
8:39
Speaker 1: let me rephrase that, we'll let you give save Donald
8:42
Speaker 1: Trump and the Trump family if you let us save
8:46
Speaker 1: Biden and the Biden family will trade you a family.
8:50
Speaker 1: It's almost like a hostage crisis scenario here. I mean,
8:53
Speaker 1: that's really what this is. It's a it's it's a
8:55
Speaker 1: it's a it's a hostage situation where we're doing a
8:58
Speaker 1: prisoner swap. Is how that they're basically thinking about this.
9:02
Speaker 1: You want your guy back and his family that we're
9:06
Speaker 1: holding hostage. That's fine. You give us our guy back
9:09
Speaker 1: and you don't investigate, and then we'll all be in
9:12
Speaker 1: a good place and we all go back to our
9:14
Speaker 1: homes and we leave this alone and we move on.
9:17
Speaker 1: Number One, I don't trust them, and I don't believe
9:20
Speaker 1: they're going to ever stop going after Donald Trump. I
9:24
Speaker 1: don't believe they're ever gonna stop going after the Trump
9:29
Speaker 1: family or the Trump entities. This genie is out of
9:33
Speaker 1: the box, folks. It's not gonna stop anytime soon. They
9:38
Speaker 1: are going to continue to attack. And so that's why
9:41
Speaker 1: Number one minis reaction is no deal. Number two, there's
9:46
Speaker 1: too many state liberals that wouldn't agree to this deal anyway,
9:50
Speaker 1: even if we did agree to this deal. And by
9:51
Speaker 1: the way, this is a bad deal. It's not a
9:53
Speaker 1: good deal, right, so make sure you understand this is
9:58
Speaker 1: a terrible deal. It's an awful deal for all of
10:03
Speaker 1: us because to equate what the Bidens did with what
10:08
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is being accused of now, and this witch
10:11
Speaker 1: hunt is totally absurd. But that's exactly why they're writing
10:16
Speaker 1: this article now, because they're hoping that they can convince
10:19
Speaker 1: you that Donald Trump is as much trouble as the
10:22
Speaker 1: Biden crime family. I want to now go back to
10:25
Speaker 1: the political article, which is basically saying, we're going to
10:29
Speaker 1: do a hostage swap. We're holding Trump hostage, you're holding
10:32
Speaker 1: Biden hostage. Let's do a prisoner swap, and everything's going
10:35
Speaker 1: to be better. The political article says this quote, It
10:39
Speaker 1: is worth taking a step back and understanding the decision
10:42
Speaker 1: making framework that is supposed to govern whether the Justice
10:46
Speaker 1: Department seeks an indictment of someone. The Department has a
10:50
Speaker 1: set of policies that governs such charging decisions, but they
10:54
Speaker 1: provide prosecutors with discretion and determining whether to criminally charge someone,
10:59
Speaker 1: and and the Trump and Biden cases, that discretionary element
11:04
Speaker 1: could be crucial. Generally speaking, the author rights, there are
11:09
Speaker 1: two prongs to this initial charging analysis under the Justice
11:13
Speaker 1: Department policy. Now, let me just say this before I
11:15
Speaker 1: get back to what he's about to try to sell you.
11:18
Speaker 1: We know that these internal charging and you know prongs,
11:22
Speaker 1: These two prongs of the internal charging analysis that he
11:26
Speaker 1: is talking about right now do not apply to Democrats.
11:30
Speaker 1: They don't apply to the Bidens, and they never have
11:32
Speaker 1: because if they did apply to them, they would have
11:34
Speaker 1: already been indicted. All right, So understand he's selling you
11:39
Speaker 1: a lie here, a fallacy that doesn't exist for his
11:43
Speaker 1: side of the aisle. He says this quote. Generally speaking,
11:48
Speaker 1: there are two prongs to this internal charging analysis under
11:51
Speaker 1: the Justice Department policy, one that is legal and one
11:55
Speaker 1: that is prudential, and both must be satisfied. First, prosecutors
12:01
Speaker 1: need to determine that they would actually be able to
12:04
Speaker 1: convict the potential defendant at a trial. The Justice policy
12:09
Speaker 1: explains that prosecutors should commence or recommend federal prosecution if
12:14
Speaker 1: they believe that they can probably get a conviction at
12:17
Speaker 1: trial based on the admissible evidence. Put differently, they must
12:22
Speaker 1: believe they can actually convince a jury to a unanimously
12:27
Speaker 1: conclude that the defendant committed each element of the relevant crime.
12:33
Speaker 1: Are the relevant criminal offenses beyond a reasonable doubt, notwithstanding
12:37
Speaker 1: the possible defenses at trial, which prosecutors also take into
12:42
Speaker 1: account when making their decision. The core of this exercise
12:46
Speaker 1: is a rigorous analysis of the admissible evidence under specific
12:50
Speaker 1: criminal and federal crime statues of the case law governing
12:54
Speaker 1: those statues. So, in translation, he's saying what we already
12:57
Speaker 1: all know. When you go to charge somebody, you have
13:00
Speaker 1: to ask yourself, Hey, can we actually get a conviction?
13:03
Speaker 1: And do we believe that if we bring these crimes
13:07
Speaker 1: against Hunter Biden, James Biden, Joe Biden, or Donald Trump
13:11
Speaker 1: or the Trump family? Can we actually make headway on this? Right?
13:16
Speaker 1: Can we actually pull this off? That's what he's saying. Now,
13:20
Speaker 1: He's tried to tell you that they don't that you
13:22
Speaker 1: shouldn't believe for a moment that you can charge Hunter
13:25
Speaker 1: Biden and it's gonna stick. That's what they're selling you
13:28
Speaker 1: at this moment. They're telling you that they believe that
13:31
Speaker 1: there are some serious crimes that in fact, they believe
13:34
Speaker 1: will stick against the Trump family, which is why we
13:39
Speaker 1: should both just shake hands and walk in the other direction.
13:44
Speaker 1: That's the argument that they're making. He's playing this out
13:48
Speaker 1: because I think he believes that they are in deep trouble,
13:51
Speaker 1: the Biden's. He then moves on to the second thing.
13:54
Speaker 1: He says. Second, in addition to the legal analysis, prosecutors
13:58
Speaker 1: also need to consider a host of discretionary factors, including
14:02
Speaker 1: some that might weigh against charging either Trump or Hunter Biden.
14:06
Speaker 1: In particular, prosecutors must consider whether one the prosecution should
14:11
Speaker 1: serve no substantial federal interest, number two, the person's subject
14:15
Speaker 1: to effective prosecution, and another jurisdiction number three, there exists
14:22
Speaker 1: an adequate non criminal alternative to prosecution. The Justice Department
14:27
Speaker 1: identifies nine different subsidiary considerations that might weigh for or
14:32
Speaker 1: against a finding that a prosecution would serve a substantial
14:37
Speaker 1: federal interest. The list, which is not exhaustive, includes the
14:42
Speaker 1: seriousness of the offense number one, the detern effect of
14:46
Speaker 1: a prosecution, the person's culpability and connection with the offense,
14:50
Speaker 1: his criminal history, his personal circumstances, and the probable sentence
14:55
Speaker 1: or other consequences that the person is convicted. Okay, so
15:01
Speaker 1: let's go back to Hunter Biden. You look at Hunter
15:06
Speaker 1: Biden and you have to ask yourself this question, is
15:09
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden in a situation right now where Hunter Biden
15:15
Speaker 1: could have a major problem when it comes to his
15:19
Speaker 1: banking issues based on what we know about Hunter Biden.
15:22
Speaker 1: The answer obviously would be yes. How do we know this?
15:26
Speaker 1: Because we know there was a hundred and fifty plus
15:31
Speaker 1: suspicious activity reports connected to Hunter Biden and his bank accounts.
15:41
Speaker 1: We also know, as Fox News has talked about, that
15:45
Speaker 1: there are farah charges for Hunter Biden that probably should
15:49
Speaker 1: come down against him. This is because he decided not
15:52
Speaker 1: to register as if foreign agent. That's a major deal.
15:57
Speaker 1: So Brett, you know, obviously all of this is going
15:59
Speaker 1: to lead to a lot of on the other side
16:00
Speaker 1: of the aisle saying these are nothings, right, these charges
16:03
Speaker 1: are nothings, and they're trying to move this ball away,
16:07
Speaker 1: and looking at this article, it is fair to come
16:09
Speaker 1: to that conclusion if this is all there is. That's
16:12
Speaker 1: what I'm saying. The foreign government connection, which is really
16:15
Speaker 1: the big tie potentially to President Biden and how that
16:19
Speaker 1: would possibly impact his interactions with China, his interactions with
16:24
Speaker 1: other countries, that's not in this article. And that was
16:28
Speaker 1: the speculation going into something with Hunter Biden that that
16:32
Speaker 1: would clear the deck with other things and then move on.
16:36
Speaker 1: Tony Bobolinski is a very credible witness because he has
16:42
Speaker 1: stuff that goes back to that time and no one
16:45
Speaker 1: talks to him from that time on. Is just cricket
16:49
Speaker 1: stirping and that's an amazing thing if you think about
16:53
Speaker 1: a Justice Department investigation of any kind, and then you
16:56
Speaker 1: have the whistleblowers who went to Ron Johnson and Chuck
16:58
Speaker 1: Grassley from the FBI and said, this thing is getting
17:02
Speaker 1: it is getting buried, and they were very upset about
17:04
Speaker 1: the fact that it was getting buried. And now you've
17:07
Speaker 1: got this development. So what we'll see where this goes.
17:10
Speaker 1: But Brett, great to have you here. It's amazing if
17:13
Speaker 1: you listen to what they have on the Biden crime
17:17
Speaker 1: family compared to what they are accusing Donald Trump of doing,
17:20
Speaker 1: because they don't have it on there's no documents, there's
17:23
Speaker 1: nothing on Donald Trump, right, they're just trying to hold
17:25
Speaker 1: him hostage. And even Pam Bondi said there is evidence
17:31
Speaker 1: that Biden and his kids are witnesses in any case
17:35
Speaker 1: against Hunter Biden, which is exactly why this political article
17:40
Speaker 1: was written. They know that if you actually interview any
17:44
Speaker 1: of the Bidens, they're either a going to purgere themselves
17:46
Speaker 1: a lie, or B they're gonna have to plead the
17:49
Speaker 1: fifth and say I'm not talking. I'd like to know
17:52
Speaker 1: that aspect, and I'd like to know the connection to
17:55
Speaker 1: Joe because Joe denied any knowledge of any of his
17:57
Speaker 1: foreign business dealings, when in fact we know and have
18:00
Speaker 1: evidence that he had numerous meetings with many of Hunter's
18:04
Speaker 1: foreign business partners, and that's all been acknowledged now Sean,
18:09
Speaker 1: And yes, it is a matter of national security, it's
18:12
Speaker 1: so important. Yet they choose not to get a special
18:16
Speaker 1: prosecutor in this case. And now this new evidence that
18:19
Speaker 1: we know very sad by the way, and to digress
18:22
Speaker 1: for a minute, parents, you do have a remedy relatives.
18:26
Speaker 1: You do have a remedy. As a career prosecutor, you
18:28
Speaker 1: can civilly commit your relative for your child if you
18:31
Speaker 1: know they're doing drugs or alcohol to that extent. But
18:34
Speaker 1: what we do now now is that Joe Biden knew
18:37
Speaker 1: about the drug use at the time. Hollie, his girlfriend
18:41
Speaker 1: and sister in law, knew about the drug use at
18:43
Speaker 1: the time. There's now evidence text messages that his sister,
18:47
Speaker 1: Ashley Biden knew Sashan. Therefore, they have to have a
18:51
Speaker 1: special prosecutor and they're not getting a special prosecutor legally,
18:55
Speaker 1: that is an actual conflict because as we know the
18:58
Speaker 1: US Attorney report, it's to Merrick Garland Merritt Garland reports
19:03
Speaker 1: to Joe Biden. Joe Biden and his kids are now
19:06
Speaker 1: witnesses in any case against Hunter Biden. And it's really
19:12
Speaker 1: unbelievable legally to me that that has not been dealt
19:16
Speaker 1: with and there's not a special prosecutor on this case. Now,
19:18
Speaker 1: this is what they're referencing is only in the gun
19:22
Speaker 1: crime charge, right that he lied on that form that
19:24
Speaker 1: is a federal offense where you can go to jail
19:27
Speaker 1: for up to ten years. I don't believe he's going
19:30
Speaker 1: to go to jail. I also want to be clear
19:32
Speaker 1: about that. I just don't. I don't believe that he's
19:36
Speaker 1: going to go to jail and for that crime. That's
19:39
Speaker 1: part of the reason why the prosecutors are wanting if
19:41
Speaker 1: they're going to have to charge Hunter Biden with anything, okay,
19:46
Speaker 1: that it's going to be the gun crime because that's
19:49
Speaker 1: the easy one to get out of jail on. There's
19:53
Speaker 1: also something else the media is doing. MSNBC talking about
19:58
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden to face criminal charge and they said this
20:01
Speaker 1: about him taking all the foreign money that we've exposed.
20:04
Speaker 1: And if you missed our show yesterday, go back and
20:06
Speaker 1: listen to it because it's about all the money that
20:09
Speaker 1: was coming in and from these Russian oligarchs, and it's
20:11
Speaker 1: getting worse for Hunter Biden. But even with all this
20:14
Speaker 1: coming out, what does MSNBC say. They say, it's perfectly
20:18
Speaker 1: legal for hunter Biden to take foreign money from foreign governments,
20:21
Speaker 1: from Russian olagarks to the Chinese Communist Party. They say,
20:24
Speaker 1: there's nothing wrong with this. By the way, that is
20:26
Speaker 1: a lie. There's a lot of people who evade taxes
20:28
Speaker 1: or are never prosecuted criminally, so that's going to be
20:31
Speaker 1: a big issue in this case. In terms of like corruption,
20:34
Speaker 1: conflict of interest. We've never heard a hint that that
20:36
Speaker 1: was that there were potential criminal charges there. Because Hunter
20:40
Speaker 1: Biden wasn't an officeholder, it was perfectly legal for him
20:43
Speaker 1: to take money from foreign governments, as long as it
20:47
Speaker 1: wasn't he wasn't inappropriately giving them information from his family
20:51
Speaker 1: or something. There's no hint of that. There's no hint
20:53
Speaker 1: of that, he says, that's on MSNBC. There's no hint
20:56
Speaker 1: that he was giving money his own words or ten
20:59
Speaker 1: percent for the big guy. Gotta hold ten percent for
21:01
Speaker 1: the big guy. It's all about the big guy. None
21:04
Speaker 1: of these business deals get done without the ten percent
21:07
Speaker 1: For the big guy, Tony bob Olenski said the same
21:11
Speaker 1: exact thing. The money is clearly all about that. But
21:15
Speaker 1: first I want to take a quick moment to tell
21:17
Speaker 1: you about our good friends over at Legacy Precious Metals.
21:20
Speaker 1: You know what's going on the economy, you know what's
21:22
Speaker 1: happening on Wall Street, and you know what's going on
21:24
Speaker 1: with inflation. So are you protecting your hard earned dollars
21:28
Speaker 1: your assets? Do you have a hedge against inflation? Are
21:33
Speaker 1: you terrified every day that you've lost a massive amount
21:36
Speaker 1: of money when the stock market is having these crazy drops? Well,
21:40
Speaker 1: are you diversified? And if you are diversified, you don't
21:43
Speaker 1: have to worry as much. That's where Legacy Precious Metals
21:46
Speaker 1: comes in. Legacy Precious Metals can help you have a
21:49
Speaker 1: blueprint to protect your hard earned dollars. As interest rates
21:54
Speaker 1: go up, inflation goes up, democrats are trying to raise taxes,
21:58
Speaker 1: and a skyrocketing national debt. Now is a time for
22:01
Speaker 1: you to take a look at protecting your dollars and
22:05
Speaker 1: controlling your future with gold and precious metals. A lot
22:09
Speaker 1: of people move to gold and precious metals during times
22:12
Speaker 1: like these. It is a hedge against inflation. It's a
22:15
Speaker 1: way to protect your assets. And right now you can
22:19
Speaker 1: call Legacy Precious Metal and get the free investors Guide.
22:24
Speaker 1: Make sure you call them and see if gold and
22:26
Speaker 1: Precious Metals is right for you and your retirement. One
22:30
Speaker 1: eight six six seven five one twenty two eighteen. That's
22:36
Speaker 1: one eight six six seven five one twenty two eighteen,
22:41
Speaker 1: or online at Legacy PM investments dot com. That's a
22:46
Speaker 1: Legacy PM investments dot com. Also want to remind you
22:51
Speaker 1: please make sure that you auto download or subscribe our
22:54
Speaker 1: podcast right now so you get it every day for free.
22:59
Speaker 1: You look at the time Tony Bobolynsky's story. He's a
23:02
Speaker 1: guy that comes out before the elections. He's a whistle blower.
23:06
Speaker 1: No one the media wants to talk to him except
23:08
Speaker 1: for Tucker Carlson and people at Fox. Everybody else ignores
23:11
Speaker 1: a story. This is the guy that was an actual
23:13
Speaker 1: business partner of Hunter Biden. It's a guy that after
23:16
Speaker 1: he exposed everything on a Tucker's show, the FBI calls him.
23:20
Speaker 1: The FBI brings him in, He answers questions, tells him everything,
23:24
Speaker 1: gives him all the data gives him cell phones, gives
23:26
Speaker 1: them hard drives, gives them everything, and they say, great,
23:29
Speaker 1: we got a point of contact for you. Tim Tebow,
23:32
Speaker 1: he's gonna be your point of contact. He'll be in touch.
23:35
Speaker 1: What does Tim Tebow do? He takes all the information
23:38
Speaker 1: Tony Bobolensky gave him and he says it's disinformation, categorizes
23:43
Speaker 1: it as disinformation, and then actually shuts down and buries
23:47
Speaker 1: any investigation to Hunter James or Joe Biden based on
23:51
Speaker 1: all of the information that his former business partner, Tony
23:54
Speaker 1: Bobolynsky gave them. And Tony Bobolensky did a second interview recently,
23:57
Speaker 1: he had a hell of a lot to say, including this,
24:01
Speaker 1: in the spring of twenty seventeen, I expected CFC was
24:04
Speaker 1: going to deploy billions of dollars through Sina Hawk. By
24:08
Speaker 1: the way, CFC is this Chinese Communist government partnership that
24:13
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden and his company had with them. This is
24:16
Speaker 1: the communists in China. And he says, I expect him
24:19
Speaker 1: to do billions of dollars, okay, billions of dollars an investment,
24:24
Speaker 1: and we were going to get part of that. Obviously,
24:26
Speaker 1: he was going to deploy billions of dollars through Sina Hawk,
24:30
Speaker 1: and I was focused on taking those billions of dollars
24:33
Speaker 1: and making a return on it, and I expected to
24:36
Speaker 1: make hundreds of millions of dollars. Does that sound normal,
24:39
Speaker 1: by the way, No, it doesn't sound normal. Doesn't sound
24:43
Speaker 1: normal at all. But does it really matter? Right? Because
24:46
Speaker 1: Tony Bobo Lensky's talking about this cash and then he says,
24:50
Speaker 1: you know, Tony Bobolenski also says the FBI rigged the
24:52
Speaker 1: election by suppressing the Hunter Biden scanal. I went to them,
24:55
Speaker 1: they interviewed me, they gave me Tim Tebow, and it
24:58
Speaker 1: was clear they said, we're not touching because we want
25:01
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden to win. This is Hunter, I mean Joe
25:03
Speaker 1: Biden to win, and this is Hunter Biden's former business
25:05
Speaker 1: partner who's telling the FBI all of this, and they
25:08
Speaker 1: sat on it. If you go back to October twenty twenty,
25:11
Speaker 1: and then into the November third election, the election was
25:14
Speaker 1: decided by twenty one thousand, five hundred votes. And what
25:17
Speaker 1: does that mean? Three states Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona. The
25:22
Speaker 1: difference between President Trump and Joe Biden was forty three
25:26
Speaker 1: thousand votes. If half of those people, twenty one thousand,
25:30
Speaker 1: five hundred had voted for President Trump instead of Biden,
25:34
Speaker 1: President Trump would still be in the White House. Now,
25:36
Speaker 1: I'm not arguing for that or supporting that. That is
25:39
Speaker 1: fact based on what was recorded in actual votes. So
25:44
Speaker 1: that election was decided by twenty one five hundred votes
25:48
Speaker 1: in the backdrop of a story that is the most
25:51
Speaker 1: suppressed story in the history of a US presidential election.
25:55
Speaker 1: So if we now know that that story was suppressed
25:57
Speaker 1: by a federal agency, the FBI law enforcement agency, then
26:02
Speaker 1: how did the FBI not affect the election outcome? It
26:05
Speaker 1: sounds like the election was I'll just say it rigged
26:10
Speaker 1: in part by the FBI. There was there was, So
26:14
Speaker 1: you can call it rigged, you can call it stolen,
26:16
Speaker 1: you could call it suppressed. The American people and could
26:19
Speaker 1: call it whatever they want. But the fact pattern is
26:21
Speaker 1: the FBI alone altered history in that election. The FBI
26:26
Speaker 1: altered that election historically. Now, this doesn't even get into
26:32
Speaker 1: all of the other stuff, right, doesn't get into now
26:37
Speaker 1: what we know about his a personal assistant, I'm referring
26:41
Speaker 1: to Hunter Biden. There was another big part of that story, right,
26:45
Speaker 1: Remember Fang Fang she was the Russians or the Chinese
26:49
Speaker 1: spy that was sleeping with Eric Swalwell, Democratic Congressman. Well,
26:52
Speaker 1: now we think we have another one of those who
26:55
Speaker 1: apparently was working for Hunter Biden, who was a spy
26:58
Speaker 1: of the Chinese Communist Nobody in the media's touching this
27:02
Speaker 1: story as well. Hunter was trying to negotiate a deal
27:05
Speaker 1: to sell the Chinese natural gas. But what we also
27:09
Speaker 1: learned from the whistleblower was that their ultimate goal this
27:12
Speaker 1: Chinese company was to buy an interest in the drillers
27:15
Speaker 1: so they could start getting their foot in the door
27:18
Speaker 1: to start taking over the infrastructure of the American energy industry.
27:22
Speaker 1: So this is a national security concern. Not only do
27:25
Speaker 1: we have proof that Hunter Biden was directly involved in it,
27:28
Speaker 1: the emails and text messages also show that Hunter was
27:31
Speaker 1: asking for office space and he needed extra keys for
27:35
Speaker 1: both Joe and Jill Biden. So this links the president
27:39
Speaker 1: to Hunter Biden's shady business deal with China. This is
27:43
Speaker 1: just a national security nightmare, and he kind of puts
27:45
Speaker 1: into perspective maybe why Joe Biden's made some terrible decisions
27:50
Speaker 1: that have been at the best interest of China at
27:53
Speaker 1: the expense of the American consumer. So there's the basic
27:57
Speaker 1: background on the whole relationship. So let's in the woman
28:01
Speaker 1: because the woman right. And this is again I remind
28:03
Speaker 1: you of all this for one main reason. You want
28:06
Speaker 1: to tell me, Politico that I should make a deal
28:09
Speaker 1: to save Donald Trump in the Trump family and then
28:13
Speaker 1: let the Biden family off the hook. For all this,
28:16
Speaker 1: I remind you of how deep this goes, this corruption,
28:19
Speaker 1: because no, I'm not willing to trade that because I
28:22
Speaker 1: don't think that Donald Trump has committed a crime number
28:24
Speaker 1: one and number two. I certainly don't think as kids
28:26
Speaker 1: have a number three. I don't believe that this is
28:29
Speaker 1: a trade that should ever be on the table. We've
28:32
Speaker 1: got what apparently we're spies working for the president's son Shell.
28:37
Speaker 1: Do tell us a little bit about this Chinese spy,
28:41
Speaker 1: this new Fang Fang that Hunter fell for. Well, when
28:46
Speaker 1: we saw the map, you know, when looking through the
28:48
Speaker 1: hard drive, you saw the Powerport presentation, which was a
28:51
Speaker 1: map of America in Chinese, and you saw that this
28:55
Speaker 1: was something that was given to Hunter for a presentation
28:58
Speaker 1: to the Chinese. We chased it back and it was
29:01
Speaker 1: submitted by his assistant. Well, I looked at a picture
29:04
Speaker 1: of googled a picture of his assistant. She's a very
29:07
Speaker 1: attractive girl, so I started looking even more. We discussed
29:11
Speaker 1: with the whistleblower, and according to the whistleblower, they were
29:15
Speaker 1: more than just business associates. If you know what I mean,
29:18
Speaker 1: Jesse saw, I know this is another potential Eric Swalwell situation,
29:23
Speaker 1: another national security nightmare that Hunter Biden's involved them. I
29:28
Speaker 1: don't even have enough time to go through all of
29:32
Speaker 1: the other issues with hunter Biden. This is the stuff
29:36
Speaker 1: that just came out in the last twenty six days. Okay,
29:41
Speaker 1: this is just the last twenty six days. You want
29:45
Speaker 1: me to trade these two No, I'm good. Now you
29:50
Speaker 1: go outside of the twenty six days and then you
29:55
Speaker 1: go into those suspicious activity reports that were talked about,
29:59
Speaker 1: where there's more than one hundred and fifty suspicious activity
30:03
Speaker 1: reports filed by banks on Hunter Biden because there was
30:06
Speaker 1: so much shady money coming into his bank account from
30:08
Speaker 1: the worst people in the world. All right, so what
30:11
Speaker 1: do you take this next? And how do we get
30:13
Speaker 1: to the truth here? And what do we do if
30:16
Speaker 1: you have people high ranking people need FBI and d
30:19
Speaker 1: o J Saying basically running interference and saying something's misinformation
30:25
Speaker 1: when we know, damn wall it's not misinformation. Just like
30:28
Speaker 1: they lied in weeks leading up to the twenty twenty
30:31
Speaker 1: election that the laptop was misinformation, Russian misinformation. Well, what
30:36
Speaker 1: we need now are those suspicious activity reports. That's what
30:39
Speaker 1: my committee's focused like a laser on. Under President Bush,
30:43
Speaker 1: President Obama, and President Trump, any member of Congress could
30:47
Speaker 1: request from the Treasury Department suspicious activity reports. But when
30:50
Speaker 1: Joe Biden became president, in the dark of night, without
30:53
Speaker 1: telling anyone, he went in and changed that rule. Now
30:56
Speaker 1: no one encounters not just any just the ranking member
31:00
Speaker 1: of the House words I can mean, nobody, even with
31:02
Speaker 1: high security clearance, can get this information. Joe Biden changed
31:06
Speaker 1: another rule, in my opinion, to protect his son. So
31:10
Speaker 1: if we had these suspicious activity reports, we would know
31:13
Speaker 1: what laws they were breaking, because no bank is going
31:15
Speaker 1: to notify the federal government that their client is breaking
31:19
Speaker 1: the laws, especially if their clients the son of the
31:21
Speaker 1: Vice Preys of the United States. Because when the bank
31:23
Speaker 1: notifies the government, the bank examiners roll in, and no bank,
31:27
Speaker 1: regardless of whether they're a community bank or a Wall
31:30
Speaker 1: Street bank, wants the bank examiners in there anymore than
31:34
Speaker 1: they have to. The federal government knew this. These suspicious
31:37
Speaker 1: activity reports occurred throughout the entire Obama presidency, yet nothing
31:42
Speaker 1: ever became of them by the FEDS. So what Charles
31:45
Speaker 1: Grassly said yesterday makes perfect sense that there was a
31:48
Speaker 1: potential cover up by the federal government because I don't
31:51
Speaker 1: understand why Hunter Biden was allowed to continue to behave
31:55
Speaker 1: this way with all the evidence that points to wrongdoing. Well,
31:59
Speaker 1: then I make it trade just off of what I've
32:02
Speaker 1: given you, and none of this goes back really to
32:04
Speaker 1: his laptop. This is just new info connecting dots. The
32:08
Speaker 1: answer is no, I'm not going to make a trade,
32:12
Speaker 1: as Politico is now putting out there floating this idea,
32:15
Speaker 1: you get your family you love Trump, and I get
32:18
Speaker 1: my family that we love. On the left, the bidens, no,
32:22
Speaker 1: that is not something I'm in favor of. Right, things
32:26
Speaker 1: are not so simple, he writes in Politico, when the
32:29
Speaker 1: underlying conduct is either relatively unusual or concerns a subject
32:33
Speaker 1: in which prosecutors tend to be more flexible in their
32:36
Speaker 1: approach to criminal charges. He even says a recent report
32:40
Speaker 1: for The Washington Post about The Hunter Biden investigation illustrates
32:43
Speaker 1: the problem. This problem, well, if somebody is looking at it.
32:47
Speaker 1: The story reports that federal agents investigating Biden have gathered
32:51
Speaker 1: what they believe is sufficient evidence to charge him with
32:56
Speaker 1: tax crimes and a false statement related to a gun
32:59
Speaker 1: per in October twenty eighteen, when he allegedly lied on
33:04
Speaker 1: that atf forum and ask whether to purchase that the
33:06
Speaker 1: purchaser is a drug user. This, this article really says this.
33:11
Speaker 1: This was an odd story for a couple of reasons.
33:13
Speaker 1: For one thing, as the article noted in passing, it
33:16
Speaker 1: is up to the Justice Department prosecutors to make these decisions,
33:20
Speaker 1: not FBI agents. Well, if the FBI is running things
33:24
Speaker 1: the way they are, you shouldn't be surprised by this.
33:29
Speaker 1: Do not agree to this, folks. The Biden family, the
33:33
Speaker 1: Biden crime family, is not the Trump family. The Trump
33:37
Speaker 1: family is not a crime family. And this idea that
33:40
Speaker 1: we can raid Marlago and now hold your guy hostage
33:43
Speaker 1: and then somehow you should agree to this no matter
33:47
Speaker 1: what is a problem. Fundamentally, it is a problem that
33:54
Speaker 1: that should not or an equation that does not add
33:59
Speaker 1: up one plus one is not too here. Okay, you
34:02
Speaker 1: guys walk away and we walk away. This is not appropriate, right,
34:08
Speaker 1: This is not something that you should say yes to
34:11
Speaker 1: or agree to. And I'm bringing it up today because
34:14
Speaker 1: we all need to say hell no to this. Go back,
34:18
Speaker 1: listen to our other podcasts on Hunter Biden, our Exposs.
34:21
Speaker 1: We've covered this better than any other show out there.
34:24
Speaker 1: I believe we've put a countless hundreds of hours into
34:27
Speaker 1: this story. So make sure you go back and listen
34:30
Speaker 1: to all that we've already uncovered. All right, just go
34:33
Speaker 1: backwards in the podcast. Please share this podcast, Please write
34:36
Speaker 1: us a five star review as well, and I will
34:38
Speaker 1: see you back here tomorrow