Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Texas Exposes Illegals Voting in Prior Elections & the Deep State Indicts Trump AGAIN!

Transcript

Texas Exposes Illegals Voting in Prior Elections & the Deep State Indicts Trump AGAIN! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: We have got a lot to cover, including the shocking
0:04
Speaker 1: breaking news that Jack Smith's grand jury has brought a
0:09
Speaker 1: new superseding indictment against Donald Trump, meant to work around
0:14
Speaker 1: the recent Supreme Court ruling holding that Trump's official actions
0:20
Speaker 1: as president were not subject to prosecution.
0:25
Speaker 2: What does this mean?
0:26
Speaker 1: In translation, they're trying to either bare minimum, put Donald
0:29
Speaker 1: Trump in a courtroom instead of on the campaign trail
0:32
Speaker 1: to interfere with this election that we're in right now,
0:36
Speaker 1: or they're trying to lock him up and put him
0:39
Speaker 1: in jail so that he literally can't be president of
0:43
Speaker 1: the United States of America.
0:45
Speaker 2: The Biden and Harrish regime is.
0:47
Speaker 1: Obsessed with putting Donald Trump behind bars by any means necessary,
0:52
Speaker 1: and that is exactly what this radical rogue government is
0:56
Speaker 1: now doing with Jack Smith's grand jury that's brought these
0:59
Speaker 1: new again superseding indictment against Donald Trump, saying all right,
1:03
Speaker 1: Supreme Court, screw you, We'll just work around you, which
1:06
Speaker 1: is not actually following the law at all.
1:10
Speaker 2: I'm going to get more into that in a minute.
1:12
Speaker 1: While that's going on, there's also something else that just happen.
1:17
Speaker 1: Texas has removed one million ineligible voters from their voter roles.
1:25
Speaker 1: They also found that thirty percent of non citizens previously
1:30
Speaker 1: cast ballots.
1:32
Speaker 2: This is the.
1:33
Speaker 1: Biden administration has five hundred and fifty thousand more illegal
1:38
Speaker 1: aliens they say could receive amnesty under a Biden Harris
1:43
Speaker 1: administration executive order. And I'll give you the details on
1:46
Speaker 1: all of that in a moment.
1:48
Speaker 2: Now.
1:48
Speaker 1: While all this is happening, there's another story that deals
1:51
Speaker 1: with Facebook admitted. Yeah, we uh, straight up suppress censored
1:57
Speaker 1: in silenced conservatives in the last election. And we did
2:00
Speaker 1: it because the FBI and the Deep State told us
2:03
Speaker 1: to do it, and the United States government met with
2:06
Speaker 1: us under Biden Harris and said, we don't want these
2:09
Speaker 1: stories to see the light of day. And that's exactly
2:12
Speaker 1: what big tech did. Yeah, there's a lot happening. I'm
2:16
Speaker 1: going to get into all of it now. Before I
2:17
Speaker 1: get to that, I want to say, first of all,
2:19
Speaker 1: thank you to so many of you that listen to
2:21
Speaker 1: the show that have gotten involved to help the people
2:24
Speaker 1: in Israel. The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is
2:28
Speaker 1: doing amazing work on the ground and we are quickly
2:31
Speaker 1: approaching the one year anniversary of the horrific Hamas attacks.
2:36
Speaker 2: On Israel.
2:38
Speaker 1: The sad thing is the Holy Land continues to be
2:41
Speaker 1: attacked on multiple fronts.
2:43
Speaker 2: We have had deadly threats.
2:45
Speaker 1: That are increasing in northern Israel, constant rocket attacks from
2:49
Speaker 1: terrorist groups like HESBLA that have been fired at Israel
2:52
Speaker 1: causing widespread damage, and even wildfires have destroyed precious farmland. Now,
3:00
Speaker 1: since the war started, the International Fellowship of Christians and
3:04
Speaker 1: Jews has been on the forefront of Israel, addressing the
3:07
Speaker 1: needs of the most vulnerable. That's why I have partnered
3:10
Speaker 1: with IFCJ and I want to ask for your help.
3:13
Speaker 1: Your life saving donation will help provide emergency food as
3:17
Speaker 1: well as critical security needs such as flat jackets, firefighting equipment,
3:23
Speaker 1: armored vehicles including armored ambulances, bomb shelters and more. We
3:30
Speaker 1: are looking for five hundred listeners to join the Fellowship
3:34
Speaker 1: and me by donating one hundred and fifty dollars to
3:36
Speaker 1: meet the urgent needs of the security needs of the
3:40
Speaker 1: people in Israel. And thanks to a generous IFCJ donor,
3:45
Speaker 1: your gift is going to be matched automatically, doubling your
3:49
Speaker 1: impact in the Holy Land. Now, if you would like
3:52
Speaker 1: to get involved and you want to make a gift.
3:54
Speaker 1: Please call them eight to eight four eight eight IFCJ.
4:00
Speaker 1: That's eight eight eight four eight eight IFCJ. IFCJ on
4:06
Speaker 1: your phone is four three two five. You can also
4:09
Speaker 1: go online to support IFCJ dot org to give that's
4:13
Speaker 1: one word support, IFCJ dot org SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. Israel
4:19
Speaker 1: needs our support now more than ever. All right, so
4:23
Speaker 1: let's go back to one of these stories that I
4:27
Speaker 1: think is incredible, and it tells you just about how
4:29
Speaker 1: much corruption there is within our voting and our voting
4:34
Speaker 1: roles UH in this country. And this is coming from Texas. Now,
4:38
Speaker 1: why don't I use Texas as a barometer? Texas is
4:41
Speaker 1: obviously a much more conservative state. And if Texas had
4:46
Speaker 1: a million ineligible voters PERGS from their voter roles, imagine
4:50
Speaker 1: what that number is in more liberal states. This is
4:54
Speaker 1: shocking coming from the governor Texas. Governor Abbott announced that
4:59
Speaker 1: since he's he signed Senate Bill one into law on
5:02
Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, the state has removed more than one
5:05
Speaker 1: million ineligible voters from its voter rolls. As Senate Bill
5:10
Speaker 1: one aimed to uphold the integrity of elections in Texas
5:14
Speaker 1: by establishing uniform voting hours across the state and banning
5:19
Speaker 1: drive through voting and unsolicited applications for mail in ballots,
5:24
Speaker 1: which is what Democrats absolutely loved, because that's where you
5:28
Speaker 1: can use to your vantage for corruption. Illegal voting in
5:32
Speaker 1: Texas will never be tolerated, is what the governor said
5:35
Speaker 1: at the time, and that is why they passed this bill.
5:38
Speaker 1: Now what's happened since then is Texas has removed from
5:41
Speaker 1: its roles people who were non citizens okay, illegal immigrants, deceased,
5:47
Speaker 1: or those who had moved out of the state and
5:49
Speaker 1: were no longer residents. According to the press release from
5:52
Speaker 1: the Governor's office in Texas, more than six thousand, five
5:57
Speaker 1: hundred of those removed from the voter roles are in fact,
6:01
Speaker 1: you guessed it, non citizens illegal immigrants. Abbott's office claimed
6:07
Speaker 1: that one nine hundred and thirty of those individuals, or
6:11
Speaker 1: about thirty percent, had in fact voted in previous elections,
6:15
Speaker 1: So there were thousands that is an accurate statement of
6:19
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants that actually voted in previous elections, canceling out
6:24
Speaker 1: the votes of American citizens. The Secretary of State's office
6:29
Speaker 1: is in the process of sending all one nine thirty
6:32
Speaker 1: records to the Attorney General's Office for investigation and potential
6:37
Speaker 1: legal action.
6:39
Speaker 2: That is a good start.
6:41
Speaker 1: Over six thousand of those removed from Texas voter rolls
6:44
Speaker 1: had felony convictions. Four hundred and fifty eight thousand were
6:49
Speaker 1: deceased and that's where the biggest corruption is. Dead people
6:52
Speaker 1: yes voting, and four hundred and sixty three thousand were
6:56
Speaker 1: on the suspended list now. The release noted that the
7:00
Speaker 1: removal process is still ongoing. Abbot again saying election integrity
7:06
Speaker 1: is quote essential to our democracy. Saying this, I've signed
7:11
Speaker 1: the strongest election laws in the nation to protect the
7:13
Speaker 1: right to vote and to crack down on illegal voting.
7:16
Speaker 1: Abbot stated these reforms have led to the removal of
7:20
Speaker 1: over one million ineligible people from our voter roles in
7:25
Speaker 1: the last three years, including non citizens, decease voters, and
7:28
Speaker 1: people who have moved to another state. The Secretary of
7:32
Speaker 1: State in county voter registrars have an ongoing legal requirement
7:36
Speaker 1: to review the review the voter rolls, remove ineligible voters
7:41
Speaker 1: and refer any potential legal voting to the Attorney General's
7:44
Speaker 1: Office and local authorities for investigation and prosecution. Illegal voting
7:51
Speaker 1: in Texas will never be tolerated. The governor said, we
7:54
Speaker 1: will continue to actively safeguard texans sacred right to vote
7:58
Speaker 1: while also aggressively protecting our elections from illegal voting. Now,
8:04
Speaker 1: on Monday, a Texas federal judge placed a temporary two
8:07
Speaker 1: weeks stay on the Biden Harris administrations Keeping Families Together
8:11
Speaker 1: program as well, that is a mass amnesty process for
8:15
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants, spouses and step children of American citizens, following
8:20
Speaker 1: a lawsuit filed by sixteen Republican led states, including Texas. Now,
8:25
Speaker 1: according to the White House, there are approximately five hundred
8:30
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand illegal immigrants in the US who could
8:34
Speaker 1: now qualify for the program, which would entitle them to
8:38
Speaker 1: parole in place while awaiting adjustment of their immigration status,
8:44
Speaker 1: meaning amnesty. These thirteen states complain, and their complaints suggests
8:50
Speaker 1: that it would extend mass amnesty instantly to roughly one
8:54
Speaker 1: point three million illegal aliens, many of whom have been
8:58
Speaker 1: residing in the country on the law awfully for decades.
9:02
Speaker 1: The Texas Attorney General Kim Paxon, saying about this move
9:05
Speaker 1: by the Biden administration of grant amnesty to five hundred
9:08
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand legals quote biden zuparole work around unilaterally
9:12
Speaker 1: grants the opportunity for citizenship to unvetted aliens.
9:18
Speaker 2: Those would be illegals first.
9:20
Speaker 1: Whose first act on American soil was to break our laws.
9:24
Speaker 1: This violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration
9:29
Speaker 1: disaster that is hurting Texas and our country. Now, it's
9:33
Speaker 1: very clear that the Biden Harris administration are trying to
9:36
Speaker 1: buy votes ahead of election day. That's why they're doing
9:40
Speaker 1: this right now, saying, hey, over a half million of you,
9:42
Speaker 1: you've got family and friends that can vote, right, well,
9:45
Speaker 1: we need you to get them to vote for us.
9:49
Speaker 1: Let me break this down for you so you understand
9:52
Speaker 1: exactly how this announcement came out. The Department of Homeland Security,
9:56
Speaker 1: obviously under the direction of Harris and Biden, announced, and
10:01
Speaker 1: this is part of their marketing and pr campaign, that
10:04
Speaker 1: the quote keeping Families Together program, which is not actually
10:09
Speaker 1: anything different than a mass amnesty program for at least
10:13
Speaker 1: five hundred and fifty thousand legal aliens already residing in
10:16
Speaker 1: the US, must move forward, they said, and their marketing
10:19
Speaker 1: as well, We're just trying to keep families together, right,
10:22
Speaker 1: because who would be against keeping families together.
10:24
Speaker 2: So we'll give it that name.
10:26
Speaker 1: So if you're against this, and then we can point
10:27
Speaker 1: it and go Hold on a second, you're against keeping
10:30
Speaker 1: families together?
10:31
Speaker 2: How evil are you? Donald Trump? How evil are you?
10:34
Speaker 1: Senator who's running for reelection Ted Cruz in Texas?
10:38
Speaker 2: How evil are you? Congressmen running for reelection?
10:41
Speaker 1: How evil are you to not want to keep families together?
10:45
Speaker 2: It's a talking point. Now.
10:47
Speaker 1: The federal government under Harrison Biden claimed that the new
10:50
Speaker 1: process demonstrates that the Biden Airs administration has a quote
10:56
Speaker 1: commitment to promoting family unity in the immigration system.
11:01
Speaker 2: So what does it really do?
11:04
Speaker 1: It unlawfully creates a program that effectively provides a completely
11:09
Speaker 1: new way, a new highway, a new pathway, a new
11:13
Speaker 1: roadway to citizenship.
11:16
Speaker 2: In this workaround that no one voted on.
11:18
Speaker 1: The program would allow illegal aliens, including spouses and step
11:22
Speaker 1: children of American citizens to quote request parole in place
11:29
Speaker 1: under existing statutory authority. If granted parole in place, then
11:35
Speaker 1: eligible illegal aliens would be allowed to remain in the
11:38
Speaker 1: US while they request an adjustment of their status. Now,
11:43
Speaker 1: according to this press release from the US Customs and
11:46
Speaker 1: Immigration Services, the administration estimates that there's at least a
11:51
Speaker 1: half a million illegal alien spouses and at least fifty
11:55
Speaker 1: thousand illegal alien step children of American citizens that would
11:58
Speaker 1: then be given amnesty.
12:00
Speaker 2: Now.
12:01
Speaker 1: Notice the way they were that the administration estimates there
12:04
Speaker 1: is at least a half million illegal alien spouses. That
12:08
Speaker 1: number could be much higher. It could be a million,
12:12
Speaker 1: because they're not going to tell you the real number.
12:14
Speaker 1: They're going to wanted this to become like the new
12:17
Speaker 1: law of the land, and then you'll find out years
12:20
Speaker 1: later what the real number was. I wouldn't be surprised
12:24
Speaker 1: if this number is actually well over a million illegal
12:27
Speaker 1: alien spouses. Of the roughly half a million spouses of
12:31
Speaker 1: American citizens on average, most have resided unlawfully in the
12:37
Speaker 1: US twenty three years. The Department also reported to be
12:41
Speaker 1: eligible for the program. They say spouses must have lived
12:44
Speaker 1: in the country illegally since June of twenty fourteen. And
12:48
Speaker 1: I've been married to a US citizen since June twenty
12:51
Speaker 1: twenty four, So run out there and hurry up and
12:54
Speaker 1: get married right by June twenty twenty four is the
12:56
Speaker 1: message that they were clearly sending a few months ago. Now,
13:00
Speaker 1: eligible step children, they say of American citizens must be
13:04
Speaker 1: under twenty one and be unmarried, they must be residing
13:08
Speaker 1: unlawfully in the US since June of this year, and
13:12
Speaker 1: have illegal alien parient parent who is married to a
13:16
Speaker 1: US citizen. So this is just a whole new way
13:19
Speaker 1: of giving.
13:20
Speaker 2: A pathway to citizenship.
13:22
Speaker 1: And completely skirting what the immigration laws actually say in
13:26
Speaker 1: this country. Right now, applicants, by the way, they say,
13:30
Speaker 1: cannot have a quote disqualifying criminal history, which includes such
13:33
Speaker 1: offenches as murder. Glad we have such a high standard
13:37
Speaker 1: to become a citizen now. Rape crimes involving firearms or
13:41
Speaker 1: controlled substances, aggressive assault, child pornography or abuse, and domestic violence.
13:47
Speaker 1: They say, those convicted of other crimes can quote overcome
13:50
Speaker 1: the presumption of ineligibility by demonstrating positive factors that can
13:56
Speaker 1: be considered in overcoming this presumtion and showing that you
14:01
Speaker 1: warrant a favorable exercise of discretion.
14:05
Speaker 2: Let me take a quick.
14:06
Speaker 1: Moment to tell you about an incredible company that stands
14:10
Speaker 1: up and fights for our First and our Second Amendment rights.
14:13
Speaker 1: They fight for the rights of unborn children, and they
14:17
Speaker 1: fight every time you pay your bill to them for
14:20
Speaker 1: our veterans, our first responders, and our wounded warriors. I'm
14:25
Speaker 1: talking about Patriot Mobile. They are the only conservative Christian
14:31
Speaker 1: wireless provider in the country, and when you pay your
14:34
Speaker 1: bill to them every month, they actually take about five
14:37
Speaker 1: percent of your bill and give it back to the
14:39
Speaker 1: causes that I just mentioned at no extra cost to you. Now,
14:44
Speaker 1: the reason why that's incredible is because if you're with
14:47
Speaker 1: Big Mobile, you're actually supporting and funding the Left in
14:51
Speaker 1: a very big way. Big Mobile gives big donations to
14:55
Speaker 1: organizations that pay and advocate for abortion on demand. They
15:00
Speaker 1: give big donations to Democratic candidates and causes at the local, state,
15:06
Speaker 1: and national level. Another reason why you should make the
15:11
Speaker 1: switch to a company that stands with your values. Now,
15:14
Speaker 1: making the switch Patriot Mobile is easy. You can keep
15:17
Speaker 1: your same cell phone you have right now, keep your
15:20
Speaker 1: same cell phone number, or you can upgrade to a
15:23
Speaker 1: new phone, and you don't have to worry about coverage
15:25
Speaker 1: because in twenty twenty four, it is actually really easy
15:29
Speaker 1: to make the switch, and you're gonna have the same
15:31
Speaker 1: exact coverage that you are used to because they use
15:35
Speaker 1: the same exact towers that you're using right now. So
15:39
Speaker 1: call right now, nine to seven to two Patriot that's
15:44
Speaker 1: nine to seven to two Patriot or patriotmobile dot com
15:49
Speaker 1: slash ferguson. Now, when you use the promo code ferguson,
15:52
Speaker 1: you're gonna get a free month of service. So don't
15:56
Speaker 1: wait any longer. Stop giving your money to comanes that
15:59
Speaker 1: literally hate your family values and hate your Christian values.
16:03
Speaker 1: Make the switch, get nationwide coverage and make a difference
16:07
Speaker 1: with every phone call you make. Nine seven to two
16:11
Speaker 1: Patriot that's nine to seven to two Patriot or patriotmobile
16:15
Speaker 1: dot com slash ferguson. Promo code ferguson. You'll get one
16:19
Speaker 1: month of service for free. Now, even illegal aliens currently
16:24
Speaker 1: facing removal proceedings, the Biden Harris team says, would be
16:29
Speaker 1: eligible for the Biden Harris administration new program. So you've
16:33
Speaker 1: screwed up your in current removal process, We'll just stomp
16:38
Speaker 1: all that and you can stay because you have an
16:40
Speaker 1: anchor family member, an anchor baby quote. If you have
16:44
Speaker 1: a final executed removal order none disqualified criminal history, or
16:51
Speaker 1: other derogatory information your case, you may provide additional documentation
16:55
Speaker 1: that you believe demonstrates your pro is warranted based on
16:58
Speaker 1: a significant public benefit or urgent humanitarian reasons and that
17:04
Speaker 1: you merit a favorable exercise of discretion. Okay, now that's
17:07
Speaker 1: what the US government said. So let's break that down.
17:12
Speaker 1: Let's say that you're part of the removal process, and
17:15
Speaker 1: we don't know how many are in that process right now.
17:17
Speaker 1: It could be hundreds and hundreds of thousands or even
17:20
Speaker 1: millions that would fall into these categories. That is a
17:24
Speaker 1: new category right there that everybody should understand is another
17:29
Speaker 1: way for them to give out actual amnesty.
17:32
Speaker 2: Like that's all this is.
17:34
Speaker 1: They're making up immigration law without anyone having to vote
17:38
Speaker 1: on it. That is a problem. Like, no one is
17:42
Speaker 1: having to vote on this, no.
17:43
Speaker 2: One at all.
17:45
Speaker 1: This is just straight up mut's make it up as
17:48
Speaker 1: it go as we go. And how can we hamm
17:50
Speaker 1: out amnesty right before election day or the appearance of
17:55
Speaker 1: handing it out right before election day so that all
17:58
Speaker 1: the family members will vote for us. This is what
18:00
Speaker 1: you call buying votes. Now, notice that everything that I
18:03
Speaker 1: did tell you right now, all of it that I
18:07
Speaker 1: that I just told you right now, every single bit
18:10
Speaker 1: of this has to do with one main issue. You
18:15
Speaker 1: have a direct connection to citizens in the US that
18:22
Speaker 1: can vote.
18:24
Speaker 2: Did you notice that that's what this is.
18:28
Speaker 1: They're telling you that you if you're if you have
18:32
Speaker 1: a connection to someone who is an actual American citizen,
18:36
Speaker 1: we want to give you amnesty so that we make
18:39
Speaker 1: sure that that person votes for us, because we're the
18:44
Speaker 1: one that gave MC. This is again another example of
18:47
Speaker 1: what I've described before of buying votes.
18:49
Speaker 2: This is all about buying votes.
18:53
Speaker 1: You look at Harris and you look at their administration,
18:57
Speaker 1: and you understand pretty quickly how how smart they are
19:00
Speaker 1: when it comes to this, Like this is brilliant, folks.
19:05
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not kidding when I say this, Like
19:06
Speaker 1: this is straight up brilliant. Right before election day, start
19:11
Speaker 1: handing out amnesty. It involves millions of people at a minimum, okay,
19:19
Speaker 1: and that's non exaggerated number, millions of people. And then
19:24
Speaker 1: you get all the family members who and you already
19:26
Speaker 1: know there's an American citisen involved in these families and
19:29
Speaker 1: these situations. Everyone that I just described, the anchor is
19:33
Speaker 1: the American citizen. And then you go to those American
19:36
Speaker 1: citizens right for election, and you're like, hey, I'm trying
19:38
Speaker 1: to give your family member right, you're the person you
19:41
Speaker 1: married or your kids American citizenship, the dream. Who the
19:48
Speaker 1: hell do you think they're gonna vote for. They're gonna
19:52
Speaker 1: vote for definitely Kamala Harris, because Kamala Harris is offering
19:57
Speaker 1: this to you now. On Friday, a group of sixteen
20:02
Speaker 1: Republicans led a state filed lawsuit in partnership with the
20:08
Speaker 1: American First Legal against the federal government to stop this program.
20:13
Speaker 1: Critics have called the administration's executive order a mass amnesty
20:17
Speaker 1: program without the authority to do it. But again, this
20:19
Speaker 1: administration doesn't care about the authority. They just say we're
20:22
Speaker 1: going to do it anyway, and they have the deep
20:24
Speaker 1: state that backs them up. States that are involved in
20:27
Speaker 1: trying to block these efforts include Texas, Idaho, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Louisiana,
20:42
Speaker 1: North Dakota, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Wyoming.
20:49
Speaker 1: The lawsuit argues that the administration's claims that the process
20:54
Speaker 1: would impact at least half a million of legal aliens
20:57
Speaker 1: is likely a significant understatement quote unquote, saying that the
21:01
Speaker 1: number could actually be more like one point three million,
21:05
Speaker 1: which goes back to what I told you a moment ago.
21:08
Speaker 1: The States claimed the program circumvince Congress as well and
21:12
Speaker 1: would do irreputable harm to their communities because now, all
21:15
Speaker 1: of a sudden, you have to take care of all
21:16
Speaker 1: of these different people, right, that's a big deal. The
21:21
Speaker 1: complaint accused the Administration of unlawfully creating a program that
21:25
Speaker 1: effectively provides a new pathway to citizenship from well over
21:30
Speaker 1: a million illegal aliens. Kim Paxson said, Biden zuopro work
21:35
Speaker 1: around unilaterally grants the opportunity for citizens to unvetted aliens
21:42
Speaker 1: whose first act on American soil as a breaker laws
21:45
Speaker 1: to then all of a sudden be rewarded with American citizenship,
21:48
Speaker 1: saying this violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal
21:52
Speaker 1: immigration to spare that is hurting Texas and our country.
21:59
Speaker 2: All right, now, let me get back.
22:00
Speaker 1: To this third issue that's really important, and that is
22:05
Speaker 1: is this America or is this the Banana Republic. I
22:09
Speaker 1: asked that question because Donald Trump has been indicted again.
22:15
Speaker 1: Trump was indicted again in an election subversion case brought
22:20
Speaker 1: by Jack Smith. Now this is clearly I want to
22:23
Speaker 1: state this election interference. It's going to be a headline.
22:27
Speaker 1: It's going to try to They're going to use us
22:30
Speaker 1: to try to influence the American people and quite possibly
22:34
Speaker 1: tie Donald Trump up in court hearings that will take
22:37
Speaker 1: him off the campaign trail. This is election interference by
22:41
Speaker 1: Jack Smith.
22:41
Speaker 2: One oh one.
22:43
Speaker 1: Now, a federal grand jury in Washington, d c. Has
22:46
Speaker 1: quote unquote reindicted Donald Trump on four feunty charges related
22:51
Speaker 1: to his effort to subvert the twenty twenty presidential election.
22:54
Speaker 1: Is what the indictment states. It's a thirty six page
22:59
Speaker 1: indictment secured Tuesday by Special Counsel Jack Smith in an
23:04
Speaker 1: attempt by prosecutors to quote recalibrate the case against Trump
23:09
Speaker 1: in light of the Supreme Courts ruling last month that
23:12
Speaker 1: concluded the presidents enjoy That would be all presidents, not
23:16
Speaker 1: just Trump, that presidents enjoy sweeping immunity from prosecution for
23:22
Speaker 1: their official conduct while in office. Now, CNN, you wan't
23:28
Speaker 1: to know how they broke the news. Oh my gosh,
23:30
Speaker 1: they were just so excited.
23:34
Speaker 2: We're after breaking news coverage moments ago.
23:36
Speaker 3: Special Council Jack Smith just filed a superseding indictment any
23:39
Speaker 3: federal election interference case against former President Donald.
23:42
Speaker 1: Trumpet superseding right, we got big, We're excited, breaking news.
23:47
Speaker 1: We got the banner going, We've got everything in here.
23:50
Speaker 1: This is massive. We're so excited. We've got Donald Trump
23:54
Speaker 1: and dit it again. I want to be clear, I
23:57
Speaker 1: don't think this is going to have much of an
23:59
Speaker 1: impact on this election.
24:01
Speaker 2: He's already been indicted a million times. What's another one?
24:04
Speaker 1: Right, Like, what's another one? I think many Americans are
24:10
Speaker 1: also going to roll their eyes at this indictment for
24:13
Speaker 1: the fact that they know it's the same guy that
24:17
Speaker 1: just got his handslapped by the Supreme Court. I think
24:21
Speaker 1: what matters more to voters now than ever before is
24:25
Speaker 1: the real issues. For example, CNN had to come out
24:28
Speaker 1: today and it meant that housing prices had a five
24:32
Speaker 1: point four percent record jump. It's a rough market, is
24:37
Speaker 1: how they described it. This is what's going to matter
24:41
Speaker 1: because home prices rose at a record rate in June.
24:45
Speaker 2: We have millions of millions of illegal immigrants.
24:48
Speaker 1: Let me rephrase that, tens of millions of legal immigrants
24:50
Speaker 1: that have come across the border that are competing for
24:53
Speaker 1: lower price housing and apartments, which is driving the rates
24:57
Speaker 1: of rent through the roof as well is driving the
25:01
Speaker 1: rates of home prices through the roof, because when you
25:04
Speaker 1: have twenty million more people looking for houses, well, then
25:07
Speaker 1: prices go up. I think that's what the issues that
25:11
Speaker 1: are going to matter to the majority of Americans more
25:14
Speaker 1: than a Donald Trump indictment, and even on CNN when
25:18
Speaker 1: they're forced to cover this listen.
25:20
Speaker 4: A just released housing index reveals just how rough the
25:23
Speaker 4: market is, especially for first time home buyers. It showed
25:26
Speaker 4: home prices for the nation's top twenty metro areas rose
25:29
Speaker 4: five point four percent from June of last year to
25:32
Speaker 4: June of this year, a record jump for that month.
25:35
Speaker 2: And renters, not just home.
25:37
Speaker 4: Buyers, are feeling a serious squeeze, especially in New York.
25:41
Speaker 4: Moodies found New Yorkers dedicated a whopping fifty eight percent
25:45
Speaker 4: of their income toward rent, compared to twenty seven percent nationwide.
25:49
Speaker 2: Let's talk about.
25:49
Speaker 4: This with CNN Business Editor at Large and anchor Richard quest.
25:53
Speaker 1: Now, by the way, this is damning because at the
25:55
Speaker 1: bottom of the screen it says top twenty metro areas
25:59
Speaker 1: are saying higher rent and higher home prices. So they
26:03
Speaker 1: bring in Richard, right, and what does he say, because
26:05
Speaker 1: she just said in her own words, right, she said
26:08
Speaker 1: in her own words, it's a rough market. So what
26:11
Speaker 1: does he say, listen carefully, fifty.
26:14
Speaker 4: Eight percent Richard, that's wild. But let's start with home prices,
26:18
Speaker 4: because year over year they're so high, but month over
26:21
Speaker 4: month there are actually some encouraging science.
26:25
Speaker 5: Yes, because they are starting to come down a bit,
26:28
Speaker 5: or at least the rate at which they're going up
26:31
Speaker 5: is starting to come down. And those were the worst,
26:34
Speaker 5: of course, I mean New York, San Diego, Las Vegas.
26:37
Speaker 5: Why are we not surprised when we see that? But
26:41
Speaker 5: the inflation is inflation is moderating on and we know
26:45
Speaker 5: it is, and so that is feeding through two house
26:48
Speaker 5: prices which aren't going up as fast, but they are
26:52
Speaker 5: still going up, and that I think plays into the
26:55
Speaker 5: political as season. You've got, of course, Vice President Harris's
27:00
Speaker 5: economic plan to give a tax credit to first time
27:03
Speaker 5: homeowners or house buyers of twenty five thousand dollars. When
27:07
Speaker 5: you see the numbers the first time buyers are having
27:10
Speaker 5: to pay, you can understand that that will be an
27:14
Speaker 5: attractive policy, assuming sheev works out how she's going to
27:17
Speaker 5: pay for it. But that as a policy, per se,
27:20
Speaker 5: is one of those things that will be attractive.
27:23
Speaker 2: And let's just pause there.
27:25
Speaker 1: So they're saying everything sucks, and then Richard's like, you know,
27:30
Speaker 1: fifty eight percent is wild, but don't worry. Kamala Harris
27:35
Speaker 1: is going to give you like twenty five thousand dollars
27:38
Speaker 1: to buy your home and everything's going to be okay
27:41
Speaker 1: if you're a first time home buyer. I don't think
27:43
Speaker 1: anybody believes this, by the way. I think it's total crap.
27:46
Speaker 1: I think everybody knows it's crap. I think they know
27:49
Speaker 1: they're lying to them, the same way they lied about
27:51
Speaker 1: paying off all of your student loans, for example. They
27:55
Speaker 1: were lying to you, and I think everybody knows that
27:59
Speaker 1: they are lying. Now, well, let me rephrase that. I
28:01
Speaker 1: think enough people know. There are still idiots out there
28:04
Speaker 1: that are gonna vote for her because they're like, Oh,
28:06
Speaker 1: you're gonna give me twenty five thousand dollars and oh
28:08
Speaker 1: she's gonna pay off my student loans and it's gonna
28:10
Speaker 1: be amazing.
28:11
Speaker 2: Right, this is like the Obama phone day.
28:13
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna, you know, I'm gonna vote for him
28:14
Speaker 1: because he's gonna give me an Obama phone. And if
28:16
Speaker 1: I vote for him and he's gonna give me more right,
28:19
Speaker 1: there's certainly some of that here. But I go back
28:22
Speaker 1: to this indictment of Trump yet again. I just don't
28:28
Speaker 1: believe that there is a ton of people that are
28:33
Speaker 1: gonna have their vote swayed by another indictment from Jack
28:38
Speaker 1: Smith after he's already been smacked around by the Supreme Court.
28:44
Speaker 2: I just don't. Now.
28:46
Speaker 1: Let me also let you hear what sentater Ted Cruz
28:49
Speaker 1: had to say about this. We talked about this in
28:51
Speaker 1: the podcast that I do with him, Verdict with Ted Cruz.
28:54
Speaker 1: I co host that with him. But I want you
28:56
Speaker 1: to hear what he had to say about this in
28:57
Speaker 1: his own words. Take a listen, Center. This was one
29:01
Speaker 1: of those headlines. And I'm not shocked anymore. As you
29:05
Speaker 1: almost described in the intro there, that the left is
29:09
Speaker 1: afraid Trump's going to win. So okay, let's try to
29:11
Speaker 1: throw him in jail. Let's indict him again. But there
29:14
Speaker 1: is some confusion. How is it that this guy was
29:18
Speaker 1: told you did it wrong from the Supreme Court. Can
29:21
Speaker 1: then go back to the federal grand jury in DC
29:24
Speaker 1: and reindict Donald Trump on these four felony charges in
29:28
Speaker 1: essence going around with the Supreme Court.
29:32
Speaker 2: That's what it seems like is that reality.
29:35
Speaker 3: Yeah, look, I understand that. Let me say, first of all,
29:38
Speaker 3: put this in a broader context. A year ago, no
29:42
Speaker 3: president of the United States has ever been indicted, no
29:45
Speaker 3: major party candidate for the president had ever been indicted.
29:48
Speaker 3: In the past year, Donald Trump has been indicted not once,
29:52
Speaker 3: not twice, not three times, four separate times by rabid
29:57
Speaker 3: Democrat partisans who are very concerned that the voters are
30:02
Speaker 3: going to elect him. Every one of these indictments. They're
30:05
Speaker 3: not about the criminal law, they're not about the rule
30:07
Speaker 3: of law. They're not about actual conduct of Donald Trump.
30:10
Speaker 3: They are about trying to stop the voters from voting
30:14
Speaker 3: for him. In November, we are sixty nine days away
30:17
Speaker 3: from election day, and Democrats are terrified he's going to win.
30:20
Speaker 3: And so I got to say, after four different indictments,
30:25
Speaker 3: to wake up and see yesterday a fifth indictment. It
30:29
Speaker 3: almost feels like that classic Saturday Night Live skit with
30:32
Speaker 3: Christopher Walken where he's a record producer and his solution
30:36
Speaker 3: to everything is more cow bell, more cow bell. The
30:39
Speaker 3: Democrats answered, everything is more indictments, more indictments. They just
30:43
Speaker 3: want to indict Trump. So Jack Smith, Jack Smith is
30:46
Speaker 3: like to use another analogy.
30:47
Speaker 2: I don't know.
30:48
Speaker 3: I feel a little bit like Dennis Miller stopped me
30:50
Speaker 3: before I sub reference again. Jack Smith is like Javert
30:55
Speaker 3: from Le Miz. He is going after Jean Valjean, and
31:00
Speaker 3: Jean Valjean for him is Donald Trump and he must
31:02
Speaker 3: get him. And so he filed a brand new indictment
31:07
Speaker 3: thirty six pages, and he indicted Trump again. Now it
31:12
Speaker 3: is you asked, is this permissible after the Supreme Court decision,
31:16
Speaker 3: and the answer is yes, it is.
31:18
Speaker 2: So.
31:18
Speaker 3: The Supreme Court did not conclude that jack Smith had
31:23
Speaker 3: no authority in charges. The Supreme Court did not rule
31:27
Speaker 3: on whether jack Smith was properly appointed. That was a
31:30
Speaker 3: basis for ruling from the judge down in Florida concerning
31:34
Speaker 3: the Document's case, but that was not in front of
31:35
Speaker 3: the Supreme Court. What the Supreme Court ruled is that
31:39
Speaker 3: presidents of the United States enjoy significant immunity from prosecution.
31:45
Speaker 3: And the line the Supreme Court laid out is that
31:47
Speaker 3: the immunity presidents enjoy is an immunity for actions carried
31:52
Speaker 3: out that are official actions that are carrying out that
31:55
Speaker 3: are exercising their power as president, and significant parts of
32:00
Speaker 3: the first indictment were in the direct exercise of Trump's
32:04
Speaker 3: authority as president. Supreme Court said, you can indict a
32:07
Speaker 3: president for that. Look, presidents do all sorts of things
32:10
Speaker 3: that frankly, you and I can't do. Presidents send the
32:14
Speaker 3: military into combat and kill people. If you and I
32:17
Speaker 3: set someone out to kill someone, we would in all
32:20
Speaker 3: likelihood be charged with potentially murder attempted murder. Presidents have
32:26
Speaker 3: authority under the Constitution that ordinary citizens do not. What
32:30
Speaker 3: Jack Smith did here is he refiled the indictment, and
32:33
Speaker 3: you can do that. So one question, and you and
32:36
Speaker 3: I were talking beforehand, and a question was, well, does
32:40
Speaker 3: this violate double jeopardy? And it does not. So double
32:43
Speaker 3: jeopardy is the protection of the constitution against trying someone
32:47
Speaker 3: multiple times for the same crime. And the general rule
32:52
Speaker 3: is that jeopardy attaches when a jury is impaneled. In
32:56
Speaker 3: other words, when the trial, you get a jury together,
32:59
Speaker 3: you bring the jury, you start the trial. That's the
33:01
Speaker 3: point at which, okay, if the guy gets off, if
33:06
Speaker 3: the guy is acquitted, you can't prosecute him again because
33:09
Speaker 3: jeopardy is attached.
33:11
Speaker 2: At this point.
33:12
Speaker 3: Jeopardy has not attached legally, because an indictment has come down,
33:16
Speaker 3: but a jury has not been impaneled. So the prosecutor
33:19
Speaker 3: can indict Trump as many times as he wants to.
33:22
Speaker 3: That is part of being a prosecutor. Now, indicting is
33:25
Speaker 3: simply bringing a charge against him. And so what Jack
33:27
Speaker 3: Smith tried to do here was narrow the indictment. He
33:31
Speaker 3: as many of the same claims he had before, but
33:33
Speaker 3: he tried to carve out to excise the bases that
33:39
Speaker 3: were most connected to Trump's official exercise of presidential authority. Now,
33:45
Speaker 3: I think this is going to fail. I think this
33:47
Speaker 3: is not going to go anywhere. But as I said,
33:51
Speaker 3: Jack Smith is like Javert, he is on a crusade,
33:55
Speaker 3: and so he did it yet again.
33:58
Speaker 1: When I look at the timing of this, and this
34:00
Speaker 1: is the next question, is you mentioned the Facebook story?
34:05
Speaker 5: Right?
34:05
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg has now admitted that he played a major
34:09
Speaker 1: part in election interference, along with, by the way, the
34:12
Speaker 1: FBI and the Biden regime. So this story comes out
34:16
Speaker 1: and actually, like, all right, let's indict Donald Trump again today.
34:19
Speaker 1: Is there any threat that this could also be straight
34:22
Speaker 1: up election interference from the standpoint that Donald Trump's going
34:26
Speaker 1: to actually have to go back to court, be in court,
34:28
Speaker 1: be in a trial between now in November.
34:31
Speaker 3: Now, I don't think there's any risk of that. Look, look,
34:34
Speaker 3: we're sixty nine days out from the election. This new indictment,
34:38
Speaker 3: a new indictment takes time. You're not going to see
34:40
Speaker 3: a criminal trial between now an election day. We're just
34:42
Speaker 3: too close that there's no prospect of that happening that quickly.
34:46
Speaker 3: In DC, there might be some pre trial hearing or something.
34:50
Speaker 3: It could conceivably take one day, but it's not going
34:53
Speaker 3: to consume significant time between now an election day. And
34:58
Speaker 3: what this means, Listen, if Trump wins and he gets
35:03
Speaker 3: inaugurated as the president on January twentieth the next year,
35:06
Speaker 3: this case will be dismissed on January twentieth because as president,
35:10
Speaker 3: he has the authority to order the case to be dismissed,
35:12
Speaker 3: and he will. So this is.
35:17
Speaker 2: Number one.
35:18
Speaker 3: It's another political shot at Trump for them to say, oh,
35:21
Speaker 3: he's been indicted again. He's a felon. He's a felon,
35:23
Speaker 3: He's a felaon. At this point, they already say he's
35:25
Speaker 3: a fellain NonStop. When we have a debate between Kamala
35:29
Speaker 3: Harris and Donald Trump, and by the way when we
35:31
Speaker 3: do have the debate, this podcast is going to analyze
35:33
Speaker 3: before the debate and great detail what to expect, and
35:36
Speaker 3: then after the debate we're going to break it down
35:38
Speaker 3: in great detail. I'll point out on this pod you
35:41
Speaker 3: and I did a special pod the night of the
35:43
Speaker 3: debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden, and I think
35:46
Speaker 3: it was a really consequential pod because that night real time,
35:51
Speaker 3: we predicted and we said in my judgment the odds
35:55
Speaker 3: were one hundred percent that Joe Biden would not be
35:59
Speaker 3: the nominee of the Democrat Party, that this would prove
36:01
Speaker 3: to be the most consequential presidential debate in US history.
36:05
Speaker 3: That prediction proved right because just after a month later,
36:09
Speaker 3: they remove Biden from the ballot. So we'll do the
36:12
Speaker 3: same thing on this debate. But I gotta say I
36:16
Speaker 3: actually am not terribly excited about this Jack Smith indictment
36:19
Speaker 3: one way or the other. Yeah, he hates Trump, Yes,
36:22
Speaker 3: he's willing to abuse power. We know that this is
36:24
Speaker 3: nothing new. I don't think there are a whole lot
36:28
Speaker 3: of political consequences to another indictment after there have been four.
36:32
Speaker 3: I don't really see how a fifth indictment has any
36:35
Speaker 3: more political bite to it, and I don't think there
36:37
Speaker 3: are real legal consequences now. If God forbid, Kamala wins,
36:42
Speaker 3: then this legal case will proceed and Trump may be
36:45
Speaker 3: dragged into ongoing proceedings for years as a consequence of this.
36:49
Speaker 3: But in terms of the election, I don't see any
36:53
Speaker 3: significant consequences.
36:55
Speaker 1: Don't forget Share this podcast with your family and friends.
36:58
Speaker 1: I'll keep you updated on all this late breaking news,
37:00
Speaker 1: especially with Jack Smith in his attack on the President
37:05
Speaker 1: of the United States Donald Trump, former President Trump. I'll
37:08
Speaker 1: have that for you and I'll see you back here
37:10
Speaker 1: tomorrow