Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / Smoking-Gun Evidence of Biden Corruption, plus Leftists Try to Destroy Women's Sports

Transcript

Smoking-Gun Evidence of Biden Corruption, plus Leftists Try to Destroy Women's Sports · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: Welcome.
0:01
Speaker 2: It is verdict was center Ted Cruz ben Ferguson with you.
0:04
Speaker 2: Senator Biden has got a lot to be smiling about.
0:08
Speaker 2: He gave a thumbs up when he was asked by
0:10
Speaker 2: the media, how is Hunter doing? With a little bit
0:14
Speaker 2: of a grin, like we got away with it. But
0:16
Speaker 2: there are new whistleblowers out that are saying that the
0:19
Speaker 2: corruption within our government is massive. The IRS were being
0:24
Speaker 2: told former whistleblower recommended felony tax charges against Hunter Biden,
0:29
Speaker 2: and the DOJY apparently bocked.
0:31
Speaker 1: That's a all.
0:33
Speaker 2: We're hearing that multiple times when there were big things
0:35
Speaker 2: that they wanted to investigate, they kept being shut down.
0:40
Speaker 3: Your reaction to this, well, the whistleblowers that we heard
0:44
Speaker 3: from yesterday, it's really quite stunning. So the House Ways
0:48
Speaker 3: and Means Committee released transcripts of interviews with two IRS
0:53
Speaker 3: whistleblowers who came forward and said that the Biden Justice
0:57
Speaker 3: Department actively aggressively interfered in the investigation of Hunter Biden,
1:03
Speaker 3: that they protected Hunter Biden, that they blocked felony charges
1:07
Speaker 3: against Hunter Biden, that they prevented the investigation from in
1:11
Speaker 3: any way, shape or form. Asking about Joe Biden. These transcripts,
1:18
Speaker 3: they're stunning. They are anyone who cares about the rule
1:25
Speaker 3: of law. Look, I get this is a partisan divide,
1:28
Speaker 3: so Republicans say, oh, this is really bad, and Democrats say,
1:31
Speaker 3: what nothing to see here. We hate Trump. But if
1:34
Speaker 3: you actually care about the rule of law, these allegations,
1:39
Speaker 3: they're not coming from partisan Republicans. They're coming from career
1:43
Speaker 3: senior IRS officials and investigators who are appalled, who are
1:48
Speaker 3: absolutely appalled at what happened. And they alleged that the
1:55
Speaker 3: Biden Justice Department blocked the serving of a search warrant
2:01
Speaker 3: on Joe Biden's guest house where Hunter was staying, because
2:05
Speaker 3: they said that would look bad. That would look bad.
2:08
Speaker 1: Wait, let's say that again, because this is not being covered.
2:11
Speaker 2: I want you to say that again so everybody understands
2:15
Speaker 2: how massive of a deal this is.
2:17
Speaker 3: The investigators wanted to execute a search warrant on Joe
2:21
Speaker 3: Biden's guest house, Wow, which is where Hunter Biden was staying,
2:27
Speaker 3: and dooj said, no, that would look bad. The optics,
2:30
Speaker 3: they said, would be bad, So you can't execute a
2:33
Speaker 3: search warrant. The investigators were told you are not allowed
2:41
Speaker 3: to ask about Hunter Biden's dad or the big guy.
2:45
Speaker 3: Those questions are not allowed. There are payments that went
2:53
Speaker 3: to hunter Biden's kids. They were told you were not
2:57
Speaker 3: allowed to interview the kids because it would look really
3:02
Speaker 3: bad if we interview the president's grandkids. The level of
3:08
Speaker 3: detail on this is stunning. We are told that the
3:14
Speaker 3: investigators recommended bringing felony charges. And let me give you
3:18
Speaker 3: some of the statistics. The whistleblowers testified that hunter Biden
3:24
Speaker 3: failed to pay more than two point two million dollars
3:29
Speaker 3: in taxes. Mind you, he's serving not a day in jail.
3:31
Speaker 3: Two point two million in taxes that he didn't pay,
3:34
Speaker 3: and that was from Do you know how much he
3:37
Speaker 3: made from foreign enemy and entities?
3:40
Speaker 1: I can't.
3:41
Speaker 2: Well, the real question is what's the real number, right,
3:43
Speaker 2: because that number seems to be changing all the time.
3:46
Speaker 3: Well, it does. But here's what the whistleblower said that
3:49
Speaker 3: they had evidence that he had received eight point three
3:53
Speaker 3: million dollars from foreign entities in Ukraine, in China and
3:59
Speaker 3: in remaining and he received at least six million dollars
4:03
Speaker 3: from CEFC China Energy, which is an energy conglomerate linked
4:09
Speaker 3: to the Chinese military intelligence. So You've got Hunter Biden
4:13
Speaker 3: making six million from the Chinese Communist Party. You've got
4:18
Speaker 3: a Romanian businessman investigated for bribery who paid Hunter Biden
4:23
Speaker 3: another million dollars, and Bearisma paid Hunter Biden eighty three
4:29
Speaker 3: thousand dollars a month to serve on its board of directors.
4:35
Speaker 2: When you hear it that way, and you also see
4:38
Speaker 2: that we're going to get fourteen hours of transcribed interviews
4:41
Speaker 2: with these two irs, Wristi Blowers, and their story of
4:43
Speaker 2: really how the federal government mishandled, didn't handle they mishandled
4:47
Speaker 2: this investigation into this high profile individual, the President's son.
4:53
Speaker 1: The White House almost knew or acted.
4:56
Speaker 2: Like they could just get away with anything they wanted to,
5:00
Speaker 2: and they could take money from anywhere in the world,
5:03
Speaker 2: from the worst people in the world.
5:05
Speaker 1: They weren't even trying to hide it.
5:06
Speaker 2: Yes they had their Yes, they had their shell companies, right,
5:09
Speaker 2: we know that, Yes, there were bribes coming in, but
5:12
Speaker 2: this was normal business habits for them the entire time
5:17
Speaker 2: that he was the vice president, when he was part
5:20
Speaker 2: of the time when he was a senator, His brother
5:22
Speaker 2: James Biden was in on as well. And yet that
5:25
Speaker 2: when the government had a chance to look at this.
5:28
Speaker 2: When they saw the evidence that whistleblowers are saying, they said,
5:31
Speaker 2: shut it down, don't look at it, don't do it,
5:34
Speaker 2: don't touch it.
5:35
Speaker 3: It's even worse than that. So Gary Shapley, who is
5:41
Speaker 3: this irs whistleblower, testified that they had a WhatsApp message
5:48
Speaker 3: sent by Hunter Biden to a Chinese businessman named Henry Zoo.
5:53
Speaker 3: And here's what he says. Quote, this is from Hunter Biden.
6:00
Speaker 3: I am sitting here with my father and we would
6:06
Speaker 3: like to understand why the commitment has not been fulfilled.
6:13
Speaker 3: I am very concerned that the Chairman has either changed
6:16
Speaker 3: his mind or broken our deal without telling me, and
6:21
Speaker 3: that he is unaware of the promises and assurances that
6:26
Speaker 3: have been made and not been kept. And he continues,
6:31
Speaker 3: He says, quote tell the director that I would like
6:35
Speaker 3: to resolve this now before it gets out of hand,
6:40
Speaker 3: and now means tonight, and z if I get a
6:46
Speaker 3: call or text from anyone involved in this other than you,
6:53
Speaker 3: Zang or the Chairman, I will make certain that the
6:58
Speaker 3: man sitting next to me that would be Joe Biden
7:03
Speaker 3: and every person he knows, and my ability to forever
7:10
Speaker 3: hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.
7:17
Speaker 2: So to be clear, he's threatening the United States government
7:21
Speaker 2: will come down on them if they don't do what
7:24
Speaker 2: they said they were going to do with the Biden
7:25
Speaker 2: crime family.
7:27
Speaker 3: Look, that's exactly right. My understanding of the timing of
7:29
Speaker 3: this is this is immediately after Biden had finished serving
7:33
Speaker 3: as vice president, so he was the immediate former vice president,
7:38
Speaker 3: and he was preparing to be a candidate for president.
7:41
Speaker 3: And let's be clear, hunter Biden is demanding money from
7:47
Speaker 3: the Chinese communists, and he says the opening line of
7:51
Speaker 3: this WhatsApp is, I'm sitting here with my father, and
7:57
Speaker 3: we not me, we'sh Biden, the former vice president fixing
8:02
Speaker 3: to be the next president, wants to know why the
8:04
Speaker 3: commitment has not been fulfilled, and he makes very clear,
8:08
Speaker 3: you either resolve this tonight, not tomorrow, not the next day, tonight,
8:13
Speaker 3: or and let's go back to what it says, quote,
8:16
Speaker 3: I will make certain that between the man sitting next
8:21
Speaker 3: to me that would be Joe Biden and every person
8:24
Speaker 3: he knows. That would be every Democrat. That would be
8:27
Speaker 3: Barack Obama, that would be Michelle Obama, that would be
8:29
Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton, that would be a Bill Clinton, that would
8:31
Speaker 3: be every Democrat cabinet member. He knows a lot of people.
8:33
Speaker 3: He's Joe Biden, and my ability to forever hold a
8:38
Speaker 3: grudge that you will regret not following my direction. Ben,
8:44
Speaker 3: This is as close to direct evidence a bribery and
8:50
Speaker 3: extortion that I've ever seen.
8:52
Speaker 2: So let's talk about the consequences for this and the
8:56
Speaker 2: fact that there has been clearly a hey, you can
9:00
Speaker 2: go there with the DOJ. Hey shut that down with
9:02
Speaker 2: the DOJ. What can Congress do? And the real question
9:06
Speaker 2: now has to be is it time to look an
9:09
Speaker 2: impeachment for Joe Biden, certainly on the House side where
9:13
Speaker 2: Republicans have control of the House. Before you answer that,
9:16
Speaker 2: I want to tell you about our friends over August
9:17
Speaker 2: of precious Medals. If you've been saving for retirement for
9:21
Speaker 2: a really long time, then you.
9:22
Speaker 1: Know how stressful the last year and a half has been.
9:25
Speaker 2: You've seen the bank failures, you've seen the interest rates
9:28
Speaker 2: more than doubled, and you've seen that there have been
9:30
Speaker 2: losses with many people in their iras and their four
9:33
Speaker 2: oh one ks. Well, protecting your hard earned dollars is
9:37
Speaker 2: so important, especially if you're close to retirement or in
9:41
Speaker 2: retirement because there's no time to make up losses. And
9:45
Speaker 2: that is where Augusta Precious Medals comes in. They want
9:49
Speaker 2: to send you a free guide right now to gold.
9:53
Speaker 2: You can sign up also for free for their one
9:55
Speaker 2: on one web conference. Both fill with economic insight and
10:00
Speaker 2: gold IRA info for your financial future, your peace of
10:04
Speaker 2: mind and stability with a crazy market. Call Augusta Precious
10:09
Speaker 2: Metals right now eight seven seven the number four gold IR.
10:16
Speaker 2: Use the promo code Ben and they'll pay your fees
10:19
Speaker 2: up to ten years. That's Augusta Precious Metals dot Com.
10:24
Speaker 2: Say I sent you and they'll pay your fees fro
10:25
Speaker 2: up to ten years. Augusta Precious Metals dot Com eight
10:29
Speaker 2: seven seven the number four gold IRA.
10:32
Speaker 3: Uh.
10:32
Speaker 2: Look, we know in this investigation they're claiming, Hey, this
10:35
Speaker 2: is the end of it for Hunter.
10:36
Speaker 1: Right, it's not the end of it for the president.
10:39
Speaker 2: But at what point does this turn into a real
10:41
Speaker 2: issue center for the idea of impeachment?
10:46
Speaker 3: It is right now. Look, this WhatsApp is direct evidence
10:52
Speaker 3: of Joe Biden abusing his government power to enrich his
10:58
Speaker 3: son and assuming ten percent for the big guy to
11:02
Speaker 3: enrich himself. Remember this WhatsApp says, we want to know
11:06
Speaker 3: this is not me a hunter, just just sort of
11:09
Speaker 3: mooching off my dad. It says dad's sitting next to me.
11:13
Speaker 3: And the stunning thing, of course the House needs to
11:16
Speaker 3: investigate it. But the stunning thing is what the IRS
11:19
Speaker 3: whistleblower says is do o j Merrick Garland prevented even
11:28
Speaker 3: an investigation into this message said nope, you can't ask
11:32
Speaker 3: about it. We don't want to know about it. Nothing
11:34
Speaker 3: involving Joe Biden can be considered. This is all about
11:38
Speaker 3: poor Hunter Biden. He's got a drug problem. Let's make
11:40
Speaker 3: it all about him. Let's not worry. He doesn't have
11:43
Speaker 3: to pay his taxes. His name is Biden. Taxes are
11:46
Speaker 3: for little people. Like Amelda Marco said, taxes are for
11:49
Speaker 3: little people. That's true for Biden's too. It's true for
11:53
Speaker 3: in a different context, Hillary to laws or for little people.
11:58
Speaker 3: This what'sapp up directly ties Joe Biden to the millions
12:07
Speaker 3: of dollars coming from communist China. Now it is possible
12:11
Speaker 3: Hunter Biden was lying. It's possible Joe Biden wasn't next
12:14
Speaker 3: to him. It's possible Joe Biden was not going to
12:19
Speaker 3: inflict official damage on the Chinese if they didn't pay
12:23
Speaker 3: him and his son millions of dollars. That's possible. But
12:26
Speaker 3: you know what, we don't know if it's true or not.
12:28
Speaker 3: Why because according to the whistleblower, they didn't investigate, and
12:32
Speaker 3: they were prohibited from investigating. They were prevented from even
12:36
Speaker 3: asking the question. Let me be clear, this on the
12:40
Speaker 3: face of it is obstruction of justice. And if Merrick
12:43
Speaker 3: Garland issued that order, he is the one blocking the investigation.
12:48
Speaker 3: And I think there's real evidence of Merrick Garland being
12:51
Speaker 3: guilty of obstruction of justice if now look these allegations
12:55
Speaker 3: at this point. But you know what, look I serve
12:59
Speaker 3: in the Senate Senate Judiciary Committee, if you had a
13:02
Speaker 3: single Democrat who gave a flying flip about the rule
13:07
Speaker 3: of law, we would have a hearing right now with
13:11
Speaker 3: Merrick Garland in front of us under oath, asking about
13:14
Speaker 3: this WhatsApp and we would ask to see every document.
13:17
Speaker 3: We'd ask to see every email, we'd ask to see
13:19
Speaker 3: every communication between DOJ and the investigators. We would put
13:23
Speaker 3: the irs whistleblowers on the stand. We'd put them on
13:26
Speaker 3: the witness stand under oath to testify about it, and
13:30
Speaker 3: we would confront Merrick Garland with that. Now, the chances
13:34
Speaker 3: of the Senate Judiciary Committee doing that are zero because
13:36
Speaker 3: Dick Durbin doesn't care, No Senate Democrat cares, but the
13:42
Speaker 3: House does. So that is the only hope for investigating this.
13:48
Speaker 2: You know, you look at just this issue, and even
13:51
Speaker 2: there is shocking news that broke earlier today that said
13:54
Speaker 2: that apparently the Navy detected that the submarine that's gone
13:57
Speaker 2: missing may have imploded on Sunday. Apparently the Biden administration
14:02
Speaker 2: slow played that news from the public, quite possibly because
14:06
Speaker 2: they wanted a disrection from Hunter Biden and the indictment.
14:09
Speaker 2: This broke tonight. I'm not surprised by that at all,
14:13
Speaker 2: to be honest with you, Senator, if they in fact
14:15
Speaker 2: did do that, because everything else they do seems to
14:18
Speaker 2: be done in a way that's all about distractions, all
14:22
Speaker 2: about covering up, and all about making sure that you're
14:26
Speaker 2: looking one way when they're doing these shady deals.
14:28
Speaker 3: In the other hand, well, and let me ask you
14:31
Speaker 3: how cruel was it if the Biden administration knew that
14:35
Speaker 3: the sub had imploded several days ago and that the
14:39
Speaker 3: five individuals in that sub were dead. How cruel was
14:42
Speaker 3: it to the families of those individuals to let them
14:46
Speaker 3: go through the agony of the last several days. Now,
14:50
Speaker 3: maybe they conveyed privately to the families, but I doubt
14:53
Speaker 3: they did. There's no indication that they did. I think
14:56
Speaker 3: you're right. This is look for the Biden White House, everything, everything,
15:01
Speaker 3: everything is pr The Chinese spy balloon. We talked about
15:05
Speaker 3: this extensively on the podcast. The only reason anyone knows
15:09
Speaker 3: about the Chinese spy balloon is because a couple of
15:13
Speaker 3: guys in Montana looked up and said, holy crap, what's
15:16
Speaker 3: that way up in the sky, and they took pictures
15:18
Speaker 3: of the damn thing. If it hadn't been for a
15:21
Speaker 3: couple of guys in Montana, I promise you you and
15:24
Speaker 3: I would not know about the Chinese spy balloon. It
15:26
Speaker 3: would have conducted espionage over US military bases, and the
15:30
Speaker 3: Biden administration would have kept it utterly silent and secret.
15:35
Speaker 3: Everything they do is pr which is, by the way,
15:38
Speaker 3: why after they got embarrassed by letting the Chinese conduct
15:43
Speaker 3: espionage for a week over the continental United States, they
15:46
Speaker 3: shot down I think it was four damn balloons, including
15:49
Speaker 3: what appears to be a experimental balloon from a bunch
15:53
Speaker 3: of high school kids in Illinois because they wanted to
15:55
Speaker 3: prove they were really tough. It was all pr The
16:00
Speaker 3: same thing is true, like how do you not let
16:04
Speaker 3: the world know if you know what happened to the
16:06
Speaker 3: sub three days ago?
16:08
Speaker 2: Yeah, on Sunday night, to be clear, and talk about
16:11
Speaker 2: torture for the family members. That's all of those and
16:14
Speaker 2: not only that, just the amount of money that we
16:16
Speaker 2: spent tax dollars trying to find this submarine when in
16:20
Speaker 2: fact they may have known it was all done on
16:22
Speaker 2: Sunday and they were all, you know, well the oxygen
16:26
Speaker 2: could be lasting till X, Y and Z and oh,
16:30
Speaker 2: by the way, we have hundreds got indicted. So this
16:32
Speaker 2: is a great distraction. And look, these stories. If you
16:35
Speaker 2: work in press and people at the White House that
16:37
Speaker 2: work in the White House Press office know this, they
16:40
Speaker 2: captivate and people stop.
16:42
Speaker 3: Course, how could you not this submarine story like that,
16:46
Speaker 3: like they're searching for the Titanic. You've got billionaires. I mean,
16:51
Speaker 3: it was every one of us watch it. And I
16:54
Speaker 3: have to admit when the news broke today that it
16:57
Speaker 3: appeared to have been an instantaneous implosion reaction. I was
17:01
Speaker 3: actually relieved. I mean, I mean, listen, God, it's a
17:04
Speaker 3: horrible tragedy. You wouldn't want that accident to happen to anyone.
17:09
Speaker 3: But I got to say, I'm grateful that if it
17:11
Speaker 3: was gonna happen, that it would happen the information I've
17:16
Speaker 3: seen that it would happen in less than a second,
17:18
Speaker 3: that it would be instantaneous, that you would be you're
17:20
Speaker 3: under two miles of water, that you'd basically just be
17:24
Speaker 3: be obliterated in the flash of an eye. I gotta say, Ben,
17:28
Speaker 3: that is a much better way to go than locked
17:32
Speaker 3: in a dark can at the bottom of the ocean
17:35
Speaker 3: for three days as your oxygen is going away and
17:39
Speaker 3: you're in utter terror. Yeah, I felt grateful. Look, and
17:44
Speaker 3: nobody wants any of that to happen, but you'd much
17:47
Speaker 3: rather it happened instantaneously than through a long, agonizing hell.
17:53
Speaker 3: And so I guess that's sort of good news that
17:56
Speaker 3: it was at least quick and painless rather than a torture.
18:01
Speaker 2: And yet the White House didn't tell the truth to
18:04
Speaker 2: the people involved, apparently knowing that this so it was
18:07
Speaker 2: torture to the found Sunday, the family torture like political reasons.
18:11
Speaker 3: If you're the child, if you're the brother, if you're
18:14
Speaker 3: the sister, if you're the mom, if you're the dad,
18:18
Speaker 3: what's your reaction right now? Hey, wait, you guys knew
18:21
Speaker 3: about this days ago and just didn't bother to tell
18:24
Speaker 3: us and told us to hold out hope that that
18:26
Speaker 3: that they were still alive.
18:29
Speaker 2: Yeah, and the same news cycle, And this goes back
18:31
Speaker 2: to do you trust Senator anything out of this administration
18:35
Speaker 2: and not just the White House directly. You talk about
18:38
Speaker 2: this quote new accounting error. We talked about this on
18:41
Speaker 2: Verdicts several weeks ago, where the Pentagon had an accounting error,
18:45
Speaker 2: for example, and we sent a bunch more equipment, military
18:49
Speaker 2: grade equipment, lethal equipment to Ukraine. Then they revised that
18:54
Speaker 2: number yet again and we sent billions and billions and
18:59
Speaker 2: billions of dollars. There's more of lethal equipment to Ukraine
19:02
Speaker 2: than anyone knew about. And they're saying, oh, it was
19:05
Speaker 2: an accounting error and that was coming from the Pentagon. Again,
19:09
Speaker 2: if they want to just do this war with Ukraine,
19:11
Speaker 2: they're basically saying, hey, we're gonna tell you it's a
19:13
Speaker 2: certain amount of money.
19:14
Speaker 1: Then we're gonna say we got it wrong. Then we're
19:16
Speaker 1: gonna say.
19:16
Speaker 2: We got it wrong again, which more than double the number,
19:19
Speaker 2: and now we're in this thing for hundreds of billions
19:21
Speaker 2: of dollars.
19:23
Speaker 3: Look at this point, my level of trust in what
19:26
Speaker 3: the Biden administration says is abysmally low because they've demonstrated
19:32
Speaker 3: over and over again they're willing to say things that
19:34
Speaker 3: are false. Listen, Kareem John Pierre stands up at the
19:37
Speaker 3: White House podium day after day after day and tells
19:40
Speaker 3: bald face lies. She doesn't even pretend, she lies on
19:45
Speaker 3: behalf of the president every day. And this is facilitated.
19:48
Speaker 3: It's the point we talk about a lot on the podcast.
19:50
Speaker 3: It's facilitated. I blame the media, I blame CNN, I
19:54
Speaker 3: blame MSNBC, I blame ABC, CBS, NBC because they don't
20:00
Speaker 3: hover their lies, they cover up for them, and so
20:03
Speaker 3: it facilitates. They are the enablers of this dishonesty.
20:10
Speaker 2: And how big of an issue is that when and
20:12
Speaker 2: we're talking about six point two billion here right, the
20:15
Speaker 2: Pentagon made is stunning six point two billion dollar accounting error,
20:19
Speaker 2: and it provides extra aid, lethal aid to Ukraine. Like,
20:23
Speaker 2: when as a senator and you hear this, does that
20:27
Speaker 2: make you roll your eyes? Does that make you angry?
20:30
Speaker 2: What are other people saying around you on Capol Hill
20:32
Speaker 2: when you see something like that, like or do they
20:35
Speaker 2: just know that? They basically said, Hey, we're gonna lie
20:37
Speaker 2: to you guys on Capitol Hill. We're gonna do what
20:39
Speaker 2: we want to do the Biden administration wants to do.
20:41
Speaker 2: We don't really give a crap if you approved it
20:43
Speaker 2: or not, because we're gonna call it an accounting error.
20:46
Speaker 3: I have no confidence in what the Biden administration says
20:50
Speaker 3: anymore because they've demonstrated that they are willing to cover up,
20:55
Speaker 3: that they are willing to lie. And let's go back
20:58
Speaker 3: to what these whistleblowers have testified. These whistleblowers have testified
21:02
Speaker 3: that the Department of Justice actively interfered in the investigation
21:06
Speaker 3: to prevent any investigation of Joe Biden's personal corruption. Look,
21:12
Speaker 3: as we talked about on the podcast last week, I
21:14
Speaker 3: had the Deputy director of the FBI. I asked him
21:16
Speaker 3: about the FD ten twenty three he's Stonewaald. I asked
21:19
Speaker 3: him about the seventeen voice recordings he's stonewalld the degree
21:23
Speaker 3: to which this administration has politicized the entirety of government,
21:29
Speaker 3: and they rationalize it. They rationalize it because they believe
21:33
Speaker 3: Donald Trump is evil, and so everything is justified in
21:37
Speaker 3: pursuit of fighting Donald Trump. But it is ripping to
21:43
Speaker 3: shreds the integrity of the institutions of our government. That
21:47
Speaker 3: is very, very dangerous.
21:50
Speaker 2: Let me ask you also about moving forward here. There's
21:53
Speaker 2: so many people that believe that the Hunter Biden issue
21:56
Speaker 2: is over, so therefore apparently all of this is over right.
22:01
Speaker 1: That's not true.
22:02
Speaker 2: The whistleblowers keep coming forward and they keep giving out
22:05
Speaker 2: more and more damning details, just like what you mentioned
22:07
Speaker 2: and what we're talking about here tonight.
22:09
Speaker 1: But moving forward.
22:11
Speaker 2: What is the best point of attack for Congress?
22:18
Speaker 1: And are there.
22:19
Speaker 2: Any investigations into the president since this with apparently has
22:24
Speaker 2: been wrapped up with Hunter Biden, is there any active
22:27
Speaker 2: investigations that we know of for him or is this
22:30
Speaker 2: just going to be Congress exposing it and that's gonna
22:32
Speaker 2: be it.
22:34
Speaker 3: Well, there is ostensibly a special counsel investigating Joe Biden's
22:41
Speaker 3: possession of classified documents. Remember Robert Hurr, he was announced
22:44
Speaker 3: we did a podcast about him, and then apparently they
22:46
Speaker 3: put the special counsel in witness protection because he's disappeared
22:50
Speaker 3: from site. I don't know what he's doing. We talked
22:54
Speaker 3: about when he was appointed. And remember this is someone
22:57
Speaker 3: who had worked for Rod Rosenstein in the Department of
23:01
Speaker 3: Justice when you had the deep state waging war against
23:05
Speaker 3: Donald Trump. I said, listen. To tell as to whether
23:10
Speaker 3: mister Hurr will be a real prosecutor or not is
23:13
Speaker 3: whether he is willing to investigate the evidence of corruption
23:18
Speaker 3: of the family business of Hunter Biden selling access in
23:22
Speaker 3: Joe Biden profiting from it. Now we know that the
23:25
Speaker 3: rest of justice, at least according to these whistleblowers, And
23:27
Speaker 3: to be clear, I want to underscore this again, we
23:30
Speaker 3: don't know that what the whistleblowers are saying is accurate.
23:34
Speaker 3: There's a lot of reason to think it's accurate. I mean,
23:36
Speaker 3: these are senior IRS investigators who have no reason to lie,
23:40
Speaker 3: who are not, by any indication partisan Republicans. But there
23:47
Speaker 3: should be a real and public investigation. And the thing
23:51
Speaker 3: that is shocking is, at least to date, Joe Biden
23:55
Speaker 3: hasn't been made to answer questions on this. Hunter Biden
23:57
Speaker 3: hasn't been made to answer questions on this. Garland hasn't
24:00
Speaker 3: been made to answer questions on this. Chris Ray hadn't
24:03
Speaker 3: been made to answer questions on this. The this, this
24:09
Speaker 3: what's app communication is a smoking gun. This is if
24:16
Speaker 3: they're making a movie about all the presidents men, if
24:20
Speaker 3: they're making a movie about Watergate. This is what deep
24:24
Speaker 3: throat standing in the parking garage in a trench coat,
24:28
Speaker 3: hands over.
24:29
Speaker 2: Here's the evidence, to be clear, and I just want
24:32
Speaker 2: to make sure I quarify this. You believe it is
24:35
Speaker 2: time for the House side to look at impeachment because
24:38
Speaker 2: of what we're now seeing.
24:40
Speaker 3: Absolutely, yes, if this is true on the face of it,
24:43
Speaker 3: Joe Biden should be impeached. You can't corruptly take bribes
24:49
Speaker 3: from foreign nationals. You can't do it as vice president,
24:52
Speaker 3: you can't do it as president. And if you are
24:54
Speaker 3: profiting to the tunes of millions of dollars from foreign nationals,
24:59
Speaker 3: you should be impeached. You should be prosecuted, you should
25:02
Speaker 3: go to jail now. To develop that case, the House
25:07
Speaker 3: will have to continue developing the evidence that. I don't
25:12
Speaker 3: believe they have the votes tomorrow to impeach Joe Biden.
25:17
Speaker 3: I suspect the number of Democrats who would vote to
25:19
Speaker 3: impeach Biden is zero because they don't care about the facts,
25:24
Speaker 3: which means they've got to develop a factual predicate so
25:28
Speaker 3: compelling that they can actually get a majority in the House.
25:32
Speaker 3: So I don't know that they're there yet, but this
25:37
Speaker 3: investigation needs to be redoubled and the facts need to
25:40
Speaker 3: be laid out before the American people, because right now, listen,
25:45
Speaker 3: these whistleblowers have elevated the gravity of the charges against
25:50
Speaker 3: Joe Biden on order of magnitude.
25:53
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you hope the big backfire is that maybe
25:56
Speaker 2: it is that, yeah, hunter Biden got off, but the
25:59
Speaker 2: whistleblowers would be so angry over what they just witness
26:03
Speaker 2: that it may be even more damning for the presidency,
26:06
Speaker 2: which is what really matters, is the corruption with the
26:08
Speaker 2: President of the United States of America. I want to
26:11
Speaker 2: also ask you Center about a very interesting witness you
26:14
Speaker 2: had before Congress, Riley Gages. He's a famous swimmer who
26:18
Speaker 2: is standing up for women's sports and saying no to
26:21
Speaker 2: men participating in women's sports. I'm talking about how it's
26:24
Speaker 2: destroying women's sports. But first I want to ask you
26:27
Speaker 2: a question. If you're a guy, are you getting a
26:29
Speaker 2: little older and you feel like weakness and complacency is
26:33
Speaker 2: starting to set in. You just feel like you've lost
26:36
Speaker 2: that edge, your strength and vitality and you don't want
26:39
Speaker 2: to give in.
26:40
Speaker 1: Well you're not alone.
26:41
Speaker 2: Did you know that tsostrum levels have actually declined in
26:45
Speaker 2: a massive way, historiclows all over the world.
26:49
Speaker 1: Well, you're not alone.
26:50
Speaker 2: Like I said, and right now, my friends at Chalk
26:54
Speaker 2: choq dot com are helping real America men take back
26:58
Speaker 2: their right to proudly maximize your masculinity, getting rid of
27:02
Speaker 2: that weakness and complacency and replacing it with that strength
27:06
Speaker 2: and vitality that you used to have. How they do
27:09
Speaker 2: it by boosting your testosterum levels up to twenty percent
27:12
Speaker 2: over ninety days. Now, I've been taking the Chalk Male
27:17
Speaker 2: Vitality Stack. I can tell you that it works. I
27:20
Speaker 2: am no longer having to worry about getting that brain fog.
27:23
Speaker 2: I got my energy back, my focus back, all those
27:27
Speaker 2: things that I thought were starting to slip away. It
27:29
Speaker 2: is amazing. And if you want to check out chalco
27:32
Speaker 2: to choq dot com now use the promo code Ben.
27:36
Speaker 2: You'll get thirty five percent off any chalk subscription for life.
27:41
Speaker 1: Yeah for life. Go to choq dot com.
27:44
Speaker 2: Choq dot com, use a promo code bin for thirty
27:47
Speaker 2: five percent off and get rid of that weakness and complacency.
27:51
Speaker 2: Boost your testostrum levels up to twenty percent over ninety days. Uh, Senator,
27:56
Speaker 2: there was a really interesting hearing and I want to
27:59
Speaker 2: play part of this. But before we do that, I
28:02
Speaker 2: just want you to set the stage here. There's been
28:04
Speaker 2: a massive debate in this country about protecting women's sports.
28:09
Speaker 2: I've been screaming for the feminists to get their act
28:12
Speaker 2: together and defend women's sports are being taken over by
28:15
Speaker 2: men acting like women. There are differences clearly between physical, biological.
28:21
Speaker 1: Men and women.
28:23
Speaker 2: We know that, and yet you had witnesses in front
28:27
Speaker 2: of you that refuse to answer basic questions about the
28:32
Speaker 2: difference between men and women. And one of those I
28:35
Speaker 2: want to play this real quick take a listen for
28:37
Speaker 2: everybody else.
28:39
Speaker 3: Now, let me ask you, someone who's competed at the
28:42
Speaker 3: elite level and your experience, is there a difference between
28:48
Speaker 3: women and men?
28:49
Speaker 4: Of course, I think we learned this at a very
28:52
Speaker 4: young age, watching even twelve and unders play. Going through
28:56
Speaker 4: puberty causes irreversible advantage that no matter the training, no
29:01
Speaker 4: matter the diet, no matter any alterable change you can make,
29:06
Speaker 4: will overcome that male advantage.
29:09
Speaker 2: I just want to stop there because that's such a
29:11
Speaker 2: basic thing that was accepted in society. Yet the left
29:15
Speaker 2: is refusing to accept this any longer and it's lunacy.
29:21
Speaker 3: Well, that's exactly right. And by the way, the person
29:23
Speaker 3: I'm talking with at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing is
29:26
Speaker 3: Riley Gaines. Riley Gaines was an incredibly successful swimmer female
29:31
Speaker 3: swimmer at the University of Kentucky, and she ended up
29:35
Speaker 3: competing and tying with Lea Thomas. Lea Thomas is the
29:40
Speaker 3: biological male who decided that he was a she and
29:44
Speaker 3: competed as a woman and Leah Thomas. You know, we've
29:48
Speaker 3: all seen the picture where Leah Thomas is a six
29:51
Speaker 3: foot four has the arms and chest and body of
29:55
Speaker 3: a man. And when the two of them tied, the
30:00
Speaker 3: NCAA forced Lea Thomas to get the meta the trophy
30:04
Speaker 3: and not Riley Gaines because it wasn't complicated because of politics.
30:10
Speaker 3: The fact that she was a woman means, sorry, you
30:13
Speaker 3: don't get the trophy in women's sports, even though she
30:16
Speaker 3: tied someone who was a biological male, and she I
30:20
Speaker 3: gotta say Riley Gaines is she is a young woman
30:24
Speaker 3: in her early twenties. She has shown absolute heroism. She
30:31
Speaker 3: has been outspoken saying this isn't fair, this isn't right.
30:35
Speaker 3: I worked, I worked, I trained for hours and hours
30:39
Speaker 3: and hours. I got up early in the morning, I swam,
30:41
Speaker 3: and I swam and I swam. She also described how
30:45
Speaker 3: this insane woke rules that she was forced at the
30:49
Speaker 3: swim meets to share the same locker room with Leah
30:54
Speaker 3: Thomas to undress nude. And she said, Leah Thomas has
30:58
Speaker 3: full genitals of a man. So she's sitting there with
31:03
Speaker 3: a human being with male genitals right next door. And
31:06
Speaker 3: she was forced to undress next to her because next
31:09
Speaker 3: to Leah Thomas, and to be naked. And she said
31:13
Speaker 3: she was horrified, and many of the other women were too.
31:17
Speaker 3: But this is the bizarre insanity we live with that
31:21
Speaker 3: we're telling an eighteen nineteen year old girl. Sorry, you
31:24
Speaker 3: got to share a locker room with a man and
31:26
Speaker 3: and see see the full equipment right next to you,
31:29
Speaker 3: and get naked next to them, and just suck it
31:31
Speaker 3: up because our left wing politics demand that of.
31:34
Speaker 1: You, and who wants us for their daughter? Right? And
31:37
Speaker 1: one of the things about these hearings, and by.
31:39
Speaker 3: The way, they're doing that to thirteen year olds too,
31:42
Speaker 3: not even just college kids. I mean they're doing it
31:44
Speaker 3: to young kids too.
31:47
Speaker 1: Not only they're doing it to young kids.
31:48
Speaker 2: But at these hearings there's an interesting dynamic because usually
31:52
Speaker 2: there's witnesses that come. You guys have witnesses on the right,
31:56
Speaker 2: Republicans that you call Democrats call witnesses as well. And
32:00
Speaker 2: you asked a very simple question to an LGBTQ activist
32:05
Speaker 2: by the name of Kelly Robinson, and this was the
32:08
Speaker 2: question you asked, and it shows you just how psychotic
32:13
Speaker 2: the left has become over this issue. They can't even
32:16
Speaker 2: answer this basic question that you asked.
32:21
Speaker 3: Ms Robinson. Do you agree with Miss Gaines that there's
32:23
Speaker 3: a difference between women and men?
32:25
Speaker 5: If the question is about trans women.
32:28
Speaker 3: I'm just asking, is there a difference between women and men?
32:30
Speaker 5: What I can say is that the NCAA has rules
32:33
Speaker 5: in place.
32:33
Speaker 6: They've had rules in place for the last decade and
32:35
Speaker 6: when this competition.
32:36
Speaker 3: I'm gonna try it rules very clear. Do you believe
32:38
Speaker 3: there's a difference between women and men. It's a yes no.
32:41
Speaker 3: Question is do you believe there's a difference?
32:43
Speaker 6: Oh, I think that we're talking about this case with.
32:44
Speaker 5: The answer no.
32:45
Speaker 3: I'm asking a question, do you believe there's a difference
32:48
Speaker 3: between women and men? Most people could answer this very simply.
32:51
Speaker 3: I'm curious if you're willing to do so. Oh.
32:54
Speaker 6: Absolutely, I'm just putting into the context of theation that
32:56
Speaker 6: we're having.
32:57
Speaker 5: I think that there are definitions.
32:58
Speaker 3: Really it is, so I'm trying to get a yes
33:01
Speaker 3: or no. I'm not trying to get the speech. Is
33:04
Speaker 3: there a difference between women and men?
33:06
Speaker 6: I think that there are definitions for biological sex.
33:09
Speaker 3: So you're not answering. Let me ask you this question, then,
33:12
Speaker 3: why do women's sports exist? If you can't define a
33:16
Speaker 3: difference between women and men, why not abolish women's sports
33:19
Speaker 3: and just tell little girls to swim with little boys
33:21
Speaker 3: and see who wins.
33:22
Speaker 6: Oh, I'm simply saying that that sex.
33:25
Speaker 3: My question, Why do women.
33:28
Speaker 5: It's a great value, I mean, Senator, I'll tell.
33:30
Speaker 3: You, please answer the question. I'm asking you absolutely, why
33:34
Speaker 3: do women's sports exist?
33:36
Speaker 6: I think that there are so many positive benefits to sports.
33:38
Speaker 3: But why have a Soccerate Guide category for women. If
33:41
Speaker 3: there's no difference between women and men, why to have
33:43
Speaker 3: women's sports.
33:45
Speaker 6: I'm saying that there's a difference between sex and gender,
33:47
Speaker 6: and that the NCAA has rules in place, which they
33:50
Speaker 6: have for the lost decade.
33:52
Speaker 3: I would like to enter the record an article from
33:55
Speaker 3: Duke Law called comparing athletic performances for the best elite
33:59
Speaker 3: women to boys and.
34:00
Speaker 1: By the way, et cetera.
34:01
Speaker 2: I was gonna cut it there, but I want you
34:03
Speaker 2: to explain this part about Duke Law that where you
34:05
Speaker 2: were going here, and also the fact that Kelly Robinson
34:09
Speaker 2: couldn't answer a basic damn question is there a difference
34:13
Speaker 2: between men and women? Because she knows that if she
34:16
Speaker 2: answers that question. Honestly, the entire joke, the ruse, this,
34:21
Speaker 2: this absurdity is done with well.
34:25
Speaker 3: The current delusion of the left is that the answer
34:29
Speaker 3: to that question is no. I suspect she believes the
34:33
Speaker 3: answer is no because they've embraced an ideology that says
34:37
Speaker 3: there's no difference between women and men, that you can
34:40
Speaker 3: be a man, a woman, a man, a woman, a
34:41
Speaker 3: man and woman three all on the same day. As
34:44
Speaker 3: you change your mind at that moment that there are
34:47
Speaker 3: absolutely no differences. And look, I got to assume somewhere
34:50
Speaker 3: in the back of her mind she's like, well, wait
34:53
Speaker 3: a second, Like if you grab a woman and grab
34:56
Speaker 3: a man and say let's arm wrestle, I know what
35:00
Speaker 3: the result is likely to be. Now, that doesn't mean
35:03
Speaker 3: is there's some giant woman who could beat some whimpy
35:05
Speaker 3: man at arm wrestling. Sure, but the question is are
35:08
Speaker 3: there basic differences between the genders? From literally the dawn
35:13
Speaker 3: of humanity? People could answer that question, but her ideology
35:17
Speaker 3: won't let her. And I think the reason that she
35:19
Speaker 3: refuses to answer the question is what she wants to say.
35:23
Speaker 3: What she wants to scream is no, no, no, there
35:28
Speaker 3: is no difference. But I think she realizes that that
35:32
Speaker 3: is so nutty that anyone who lives on planet Earth
35:37
Speaker 3: that is not a wild eyed leftist ideologue is like,
35:40
Speaker 3: what's wrong with you? What do you mean there's no
35:41
Speaker 3: difference between women and men? And the second question that
35:46
Speaker 3: I got to is why have women's sports? Why have
35:51
Speaker 3: a separate Why have girls' sports? What? Why have girls soccer?
35:56
Speaker 3: Why have girls softball? Why have girls basketball? Why does
36:01
Speaker 3: the WNBA exist? Look, Britney gutt Grinder. She was held
36:05
Speaker 3: in Russia, she came back, She's a WNBA star. Why
36:08
Speaker 3: have a WNBA? Why not just tell Britney got grinder,
36:11
Speaker 3: you want to play basketball, go out for the NBA.
36:13
Speaker 3: Let's see how you do against Lebron James. The answer
36:18
Speaker 3: obviously is, at least right now, I'm not aware of
36:20
Speaker 3: any woman on planet Earth who has the skills to
36:23
Speaker 3: compete in the NBA. Maybe that'll happen. But the reason
36:27
Speaker 3: we have a WNBA is the same reason we have
36:31
Speaker 3: girls sixth grade soccer, because it's really valuable for girls
36:36
Speaker 3: and women to be able to compete and have the
36:38
Speaker 3: benefits of sports. I say this is the father of daughters.
36:42
Speaker 3: You know, my girls would be thoroughly discouraged if they
36:46
Speaker 3: were having to play sports against boys that were larger
36:50
Speaker 3: and stronger and that had biological advantages. That's what Riley
36:53
Speaker 3: Gaines testified to. And go ahead and play the rest
36:58
Speaker 3: of it, because this Duke Law study illustrates just how
37:02
Speaker 3: compellingly the difference is between the physiology of men and women.
37:09
Speaker 2: Yeah, I also want to not just play that part,
37:11
Speaker 2: but I want to play the part of you talking
37:14
Speaker 2: really about Riley and just how brave she is. Before
37:18
Speaker 2: I do that, let me tell you about Patriot Mobile.
37:20
Speaker 2: If you are sick and tired of woke companies fighting
37:23
Speaker 2: against your values, and you're sickond toed of giving your money,
37:27
Speaker 2: there's a new option when it comes to your cell phone. Look,
37:29
Speaker 2: ninety nine percent of you've got a cell phone and
37:32
Speaker 2: it's probably with Big Mobile. And Big Mobile has been
37:35
Speaker 2: the only choice for years. Not anymore. They've been dumping,
37:38
Speaker 2: and I'm talking about the Big Mobile companies have been
37:40
Speaker 2: dumping millions and millions of dollars into leftist causes, including
37:44
Speaker 2: millions in donations to Plan Parenthood. Well, Patriot Mobile is
37:49
Speaker 2: here to stop all that. They are America's only Christian,
37:53
Speaker 2: conservative wireless provider, offering you dependable nationwide coverage on all
37:58
Speaker 2: three major networks, so you get the best possible service
38:03
Speaker 2: in your area without the woke of propaganda pushed by
38:06
Speaker 2: the leftist working hard to destroy this country. Now, when
38:09
Speaker 2: you switch to Patriot Mobile, you support free speech and
38:12
Speaker 2: religious freedom, the sanctity of life, the Second Amendment, and
38:16
Speaker 2: our military veterans and first responders. The one US based
38:21
Speaker 2: customer service team will make switching easy. You can keep
38:25
Speaker 2: your same cell phone or your your same cell phone number.
38:28
Speaker 2: If you want to as well, call them and switch
38:31
Speaker 2: now use the promo code Verdict. You'll get free activation
38:35
Speaker 2: and the best pricing of the year eight seven eight
38:39
Speaker 2: Patriot that's eight seven eight Patriot or Patriot Mobile dot
38:44
Speaker 2: com slash verdict that's Patriot Mobile dot com slash Verdict Center.
38:51
Speaker 2: For everybody that's listening right now, this is you, uh,
38:54
Speaker 2: basically introducing Riley Gains to you know, not just a
38:58
Speaker 2: lot of people in the world, no, but certainly to Congress.
39:01
Speaker 1: And here's what you had to say about her at
39:03
Speaker 1: the beginning.
39:05
Speaker 3: James, I want to thank you for your courage. You
39:08
Speaker 3: are relatively young, but you have demonstrated incredible courage. And
39:15
Speaker 3: because you have dared to speak up, you have been demonized.
39:19
Speaker 3: You had been vilified. I saw when you were attacked
39:23
Speaker 3: by a leftist mob at San Francisco State University for
39:28
Speaker 3: daring to speak up. You had an incredible record as
39:32
Speaker 3: a swimmer at the University of Kentucky. You were a
39:34
Speaker 3: two time NCAA All American, you were a five time
39:37
Speaker 3: SEC champion, You're an SEC record holder and a two
39:41
Speaker 3: time Olympic trial qualifier. But yet on March twenty seventh,
39:46
Speaker 3: twenty twenty two, something changed. What happened on March twenty
39:51
Speaker 3: secon On March seventeenth, twenty twenty two.
39:54
Speaker 4: That's when Thomas and I race in the two hundred
39:56
Speaker 4: freestyle and again resulted in a tie.
40:01
Speaker 3: And so you tied. What was the consequence of time?
40:05
Speaker 4: We went behind the awards podium more typically, you're handed
40:08
Speaker 4: your trophy, you're marched out, you're named an All American.
40:11
Speaker 4: And so we go back there and the official looks
40:13
Speaker 4: at both Thomas and myself and says, great job butt
40:15
Speaker 4: you guys tied and we only have one trophy. Therefore,
40:18
Speaker 4: we're giving.
40:19
Speaker 5: This trophy to Leah.
40:20
Speaker 4: And I questioned this, and I say why, And at
40:23
Speaker 4: first I shortened it in my testimony, but really he
40:26
Speaker 4: stumbled on his words. He didn't know how to answer this.
40:29
Speaker 4: And at first he's, uh, well, we're just doing this
40:33
Speaker 4: in chronological order, to which I further pressed and I said, okay, well,
40:36
Speaker 4: what are you being chronological about?
40:38
Speaker 5: Because we tied, and if we're doing this.
40:40
Speaker 4: Off alphabetical order, G comes before T, so what are
40:43
Speaker 4: you being chronological about?
40:45
Speaker 5: To which this wasn't a.
40:46
Speaker 4: Script they had prepared for him, and he actually appreciate
40:50
Speaker 4: his honesty. He did say, we have to give the
40:52
Speaker 4: trophy for Leah because we Leah has to have it
40:55
Speaker 4: for pictures. They've made that clear. Leah has to have
40:58
Speaker 4: the trophy for pictures. You can post with this trophy,
41:01
Speaker 4: but you have to give yours back. You have to
41:03
Speaker 4: go home empty handed. Leah Thomas takes the trophy home.
41:06
Speaker 5: End of story.
41:08
Speaker 3: Now let me ask you, someone who's competed at the
41:10
Speaker 3: elite level and your experience, is there a difference between
41:15
Speaker 3: women and men?
41:17
Speaker 4: Of course, I think we learned this at a very
41:20
Speaker 4: young age, watching even twelve and unders play. Going through
41:23
Speaker 4: puberty causes irreversible advantage that no matter the training, no
41:29
Speaker 4: matter the diet, no matter any alterable change you can make,
41:33
Speaker 4: will overcome that male advantage, especially in sports like swimming
41:38
Speaker 4: where lung capacity matters so much. Even something as silly
41:42
Speaker 4: as throat size, men have on average a forty percent
41:45
Speaker 4: larger throat, which sounds like it's nothing, but when you're
41:48
Speaker 4: grasping for air, that forty percent larger throat makes a
41:51
Speaker 4: huge difference in athletic success. Not to mention height, you
41:54
Speaker 4: guys know the differences.
41:58
Speaker 2: Not only did I think that part that that Riley
42:00
Speaker 2: was explaining, and just how unfairly she was treated behind
42:05
Speaker 2: that stage was just horrific. If you have children, you
42:09
Speaker 2: can't I can't imagine watching your daughter be treated this way.
42:13
Speaker 2: But then Centater, you also went to something else and
42:16
Speaker 2: you said you want to put into the record, and
42:18
Speaker 2: it's a study from Duke University, and I want people
42:20
Speaker 2: to hear what you said, and I.
42:23
Speaker 3: Would like to enter the record. An article from Duke
42:26
Speaker 3: Law called comparing athletic performances for the best elite women
42:30
Speaker 3: to boys and men, and it goes through examining in
42:33
Speaker 3: twenty seventeen the top records for women in the world
42:36
Speaker 3: in various track and field events. So, for example, in
42:39
Speaker 3: one hundred meter the top record for women in the
42:41
Speaker 3: world was ten point seventy one seconds. Now, that record
42:45
Speaker 3: for the number one woman in the world in twenty
42:47
Speaker 3: seventeen was in the year twenty seventeen broken by one
42:52
Speaker 3: hundred and twenty four boys under eighteen. In that same year,
42:58
Speaker 3: the record for the number one compeding women in the
43:01
Speaker 3: hundred yard one hundred meter dash in the world was
43:03
Speaker 3: broken by a total of two four hundred and seventy
43:06
Speaker 3: four men. If the radical Democrat agenda to destroy girls
43:11
Speaker 3: sports and women's sports succeeds, little girls will not have
43:15
Speaker 3: a chance to compete. So I ask unanimous consent that
43:18
Speaker 3: this article be entered into.
43:19
Speaker 5: The record without objection.
43:21
Speaker 3: Senator Padia.
43:22
Speaker 2: I mean, that's the factsier, Senator. And you've got two
43:26
Speaker 2: daughters that play sports. If there is not a difference
43:30
Speaker 2: that we keep between women's sports and men's sports, women
43:36
Speaker 2: will not only cease to exist, they won't even be allowed,
43:41
Speaker 2: in essence, I would say, to even compete, and all
43:45
Speaker 2: of their records will disappear instantly when men acting like
43:50
Speaker 2: women decide to come in and take over, just like
43:52
Speaker 2: this one swimmer did, destroying people and records in women's sports.
43:58
Speaker 3: Well, and I want you to focus on what that
44:00
Speaker 3: study concluded. And by the way, if I had more time,
44:03
Speaker 3: I'd run out of time. Those numbers were consistently the
44:07
Speaker 3: same for the two hundred meter, for the four hundred meter,
44:09
Speaker 3: for sixteen hundred late like at every track and field event,
44:13
Speaker 3: that was true at all of them. I just started
44:15
Speaker 3: with one hundred meter, but the one hundred meter think
44:18
Speaker 3: about it. In twenty seventeen, which was the year the
44:20
Speaker 3: study was examining the fastest woman in the world. Grown women,
44:26
Speaker 3: more than one hundred teenage boys beat her time. Teenage boys,
44:31
Speaker 3: so teenage boys, not eighteen boys under eighteen. More than
44:36
Speaker 3: one hundred teenage boys beat the time of the fastest
44:39
Speaker 3: woman in the world, and more than two thousand men
44:45
Speaker 3: beat her time. If you want to eliminate women's sports,
44:51
Speaker 3: then you can embrace the radical democratic agenda of saying,
44:55
Speaker 3: let biological males compete against women, and you will see
44:59
Speaker 3: girls sports and women's sports disappear. And look, does do
45:04
Speaker 3: democrats want to kill girls sports and women's sports. Probably not.
45:08
Speaker 3: It's just they care more about this radical trans ideology
45:13
Speaker 3: that they do about preserving girls sports and women's sports,
45:16
Speaker 3: So they're like, well, yeah, that's an unfortunate consequence, but
45:19
Speaker 3: oh well, our ideology matters more.
45:22
Speaker 1: Yeah. Pandora's box has been open. They don't want to
45:25
Speaker 1: shut it.
45:25
Speaker 2: They don't want to look like they're shutting it, so
45:27
Speaker 2: they're just going to go with its insanity for as
45:29
Speaker 2: long as they can. I really hope that when people
45:31
Speaker 2: here not only her testimony, but you're questioning that it
45:35
Speaker 2: inspires mothers and fathers to stand up for women's sports,
45:41
Speaker 2: for girls sports at every single level, and not to
45:45
Speaker 2: just stand by and think that this is going to
45:47
Speaker 2: somehow just kind of go away.
45:49
Speaker 1: I don't believe that it's just going to go away.
45:51
Speaker 2: I think we're going to have to make it very
45:54
Speaker 2: clear that women's sports must stand alone without men infiltrating
45:58
Speaker 2: them and destroying what has been set up to allow
46:04
Speaker 2: for women to compete at the highest levels with other
46:06
Speaker 2: women and for men to compete at the highest level
46:09
Speaker 2: with other men. It's important that we have both categories.
46:13
Speaker 1: And when you.
46:14
Speaker 2: Start allowing dudes who can't make it, and let's be clear,
46:17
Speaker 2: that's exactly what happened with the swimmer.
46:19
Speaker 1: He swam in college and didn't make it.
46:21
Speaker 2: So he said, I'm going to go act like a
46:23
Speaker 2: woman even though I'm clearly a man, and I'm going
46:25
Speaker 2: to win an NCAA title, and they let him, and
46:28
Speaker 2: the NCAA cheered him on, and the activist democratic community
46:32
Speaker 2: cheered him on as will. And it's destroying women who've
46:35
Speaker 2: worked so hard, just like this witness.
46:37
Speaker 1: It was amazing testimony.
46:38
Speaker 6: Thank you.
46:40
Speaker 3: And Ben. Let me make a final point on this,
46:43
Speaker 3: which is this is not actually about sexual orientation, about
46:50
Speaker 3: gays or lesbians. This is not about any of that.
46:53
Speaker 3: It's about fairness. It's about basic fairness because, by the way,
46:59
Speaker 3: I think it's perfectly fine if a girl wants to
47:03
Speaker 3: compete against boys, if she's got the skills, Like you know,
47:06
Speaker 3: I mentioned the NBA, maybe one day there will be
47:09
Speaker 3: a woman that is skilled enough that she can compete
47:12
Speaker 3: in the NBA. That would be pretty cool if it
47:14
Speaker 3: could happen. It hasn't happened yet. But look Spudweb. Spudweb
47:20
Speaker 3: was what like five six, and you know, he's a
47:23
Speaker 3: little short guy who competed in the NBA. He was
47:25
Speaker 3: quick enough and he won the slam Dug competition. So
47:27
Speaker 3: maybe there will be a woman that has the skills
47:29
Speaker 3: to compete against the gigantic men in the NBA. It
47:33
Speaker 3: hasn't happened yet. We have seen so college football, there
47:37
Speaker 3: have been women that have been field goal kickers. Okay,
47:39
Speaker 3: that's fine. It's not unfair. If a woman has the
47:45
Speaker 3: skills to compete against boys or men who have a
47:49
Speaker 3: physical advantage, and she's able to compete, great. What's unfair
47:54
Speaker 3: is taking advantage of the physiological additional strength and advantages
48:01
Speaker 3: that boys and men's have to beat girls and women.
48:05
Speaker 3: That that's the part that's unfair.
48:08
Speaker 1: Yeah, no doubt.
48:09
Speaker 2: I remember when a woman for the first time competed
48:12
Speaker 2: on the PGA Tour, Eric Consortstein. It was amazing. The
48:15
Speaker 2: ratings went through the roof right. People cheered it on,
48:18
Speaker 2: they wanted to watch it. But if you have one
48:21
Speaker 2: hundred men show up next weekend to play on the
48:23
Speaker 2: LPGA Tour and take away all of those paychecks from
48:27
Speaker 2: women and beat all of those women, that is, as
48:30
Speaker 2: you just described it, unfair. I hope moms and dads
48:33
Speaker 2: will be inspired by this. I hope they will fight
48:36
Speaker 2: for their kids at the local level. And we got
48:38
Speaker 2: to keep fighting to protect women's sports. And the sad
48:41
Speaker 2: part is the feminists still have not woken up and
48:43
Speaker 2: realized that they are not doing their job right now
48:47
Speaker 2: protecting women's sports, which they claim to be all about.
48:50
Speaker 2: And I hope they figured out very soon. Don't forget
48:53
Speaker 2: we do this podcast three days a week, so make
48:55
Speaker 2: sure you hit that subscribe auto download or if you're
48:59
Speaker 2: listening on that follow button you'll get every episode automatically.
49:03
Speaker 1: It's obviously free.
49:04
Speaker 2: Please share this podcast with your family and friends on
49:08
Speaker 2: all your social media platforms, you can hit that little
49:11
Speaker 2: forward button and then you can put it on virtually
49:13
Speaker 2: any platforms that you are on and share this episode
49:16
Speaker 2: and run us a five stor review to help us
49:18
Speaker 2: reach a new audience as well, and we'll see you
49:20
Speaker 2: back here in a couple of days