Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / David Weiss is Investigating NOTHING, He is Helping Cover The Crimes of the Biden Family

Transcript

David Weiss is Investigating NOTHING, He is Helping Cover The Crimes of the Biden Family · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:01
Speaker 1: David Weiss. He's the guy that's supposed to be investigating
0:05
Speaker 1: the Biden crime family. He discussed former DOJ official with
0:10
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden ties. New emails are now confirming, yet again,
0:14
Speaker 1: proving that this guy isn't investigating anything. He's helping cover
0:17
Speaker 1: up the crimes of the Biden family. These newly released
0:22
Speaker 1: emails now shown the Delaware US Attorney David Weiss and
0:26
Speaker 1: his team discussed a congressional request last year for information
0:31
Speaker 1: about a Justice Department official with a potential conflict of
0:35
Speaker 1: interest in the Hunter Biden case. The heavily redacted emails
0:41
Speaker 1: also show that the Justice Department, not Weiss's office, took
0:46
Speaker 1: the lead on the response to Congress about questions that
0:50
Speaker 1: were meant for David Weiss. Despite assurances from the Attorney
0:55
Speaker 1: General Merrick Garland that Weiss was operating the Hunter Biden
0:59
Speaker 1: investigatation with total independence, Clearly that wasn't true. What does
1:03
Speaker 1: that mean? It means that the Attorney General legion in
1:05
Speaker 1: United States of America, Merrick Garland, may have actually lied
1:09
Speaker 1: to Congress under oath. That also would not be surprising
1:13
Speaker 1: at all. Virtually all but the subject of the emails
1:18
Speaker 1: discussed discussing Congression requests about the then Assistant Attorney General
1:24
Speaker 1: Nicholas McQuaid. The Justice Department official with a potential conflict
1:29
Speaker 1: of interest, was redacted by the Justice Department before the
1:33
Speaker 1: agency provided those emails to the Heritage Foundation. It's part
1:37
Speaker 1: of a Freedom of Information Act request, but some of
1:41
Speaker 1: the emails show that the Justice Department's Office of Legislative
1:45
Speaker 1: Affairs worked on a response to Senator Chuck Grassley and
1:49
Speaker 1: Senator Ron Johnson and gave Weiss only the opportunity to
1:53
Speaker 1: review the letter it produced, not to draft his own
1:56
Speaker 1: letter or response. For a guy that was supposed to
1:59
Speaker 1: have all the ability to do whatever it was he
2:01
Speaker 1: needed to do, This sounds pretty shady, doesn't it. It's ridiculous.
2:07
Speaker 1: The requests we're now learning from Grassley and Johnson to Weis,
2:12
Speaker 1: which the Justice Department made clear, came on May ninth
2:19
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty two, focused on the conflict of interest
2:23
Speaker 1: with this attorney the quaid who worked at the DOJ.
2:28
Speaker 1: Now in the letter, Grassley and Johnson noted Merrick Garland
2:32
Speaker 1: had ignored three separate requests for information about the high
2:38
Speaker 1: ranking DOJ official. The quad served as one of the
2:41
Speaker 1: top officials in the Department of Justice during a key
2:46
Speaker 1: period in the investigation, putting in him in putting him
2:50
Speaker 1: in a position listen carefully in the Criminal Division until
2:55
Speaker 1: fall of twenty twenty two, that put him in the
2:59
Speaker 1: position to have me massive influence over the Hunter Biden
3:02
Speaker 1: case during a key period of that investigation when they
3:06
Speaker 1: were trying to figure out what they were not going
3:08
Speaker 1: to charge him with, in other words, the cover up.
3:12
Speaker 1: Just so you understand it now, prior to joining the
3:15
Speaker 1: Justice Department under President Joe Biden, mcquad was a partner
3:20
Speaker 1: at the law firm handling Hunter Biden's defense. Let me
3:27
Speaker 1: say that again, prior to joining the Justice Department under
3:31
Speaker 1: President Joe Biden, the guy who shows up McQuaid, can
3:38
Speaker 1: you imagine the job interview? So what are you doing
3:40
Speaker 1: right now? What are you working on? Where do you work?
3:42
Speaker 1: I'm a partner at the law firm handling Hunter Biden's defense.
3:46
Speaker 1: And before joining the Biden administration, in fact, he worked
3:50
Speaker 1: closely with Christopher Clark, who was until recently Hunter Biden's
3:55
Speaker 1: lead defense attorney. So you're defending, you're working at the
4:02
Speaker 1: law firm that is handling the Hunter Biden defense. You
4:07
Speaker 1: are closely with Christopher Clark, who was Hunter Biden's lead
4:11
Speaker 1: defense attorney at the time, and all of a sudden
4:14
Speaker 1: you leave and then go to the doj and your
4:17
Speaker 1: job is to investigate Hunter Biden. To quote Joe Biden,
4:21
Speaker 1: come on, man, Senter. Grassley and Johnson have raised questions
4:29
Speaker 1: about whether McQuaid had recused himself from overseeing a probe
4:34
Speaker 1: to which he was clearly closely tied to from his
4:37
Speaker 1: time in private practice. I think you and I both
4:39
Speaker 1: know the answer, of course not, because when they hired him,
4:41
Speaker 1: it was hiring him to come in and protect his
4:44
Speaker 1: client who he had just left the law firm, which
4:47
Speaker 1: his whole job was to protect that client. That's called
4:49
Speaker 1: a conflict of interest. By May of last year, they'd
4:55
Speaker 1: grown frustrated enough the Senators Grassley and Johnson to ask
4:59
Speaker 1: David Weiss for answers about McQuaid or mcquidd, depending on
5:03
Speaker 1: how you say it, including whether anyone in the Delaware
5:06
Speaker 1: US Attorney's office had had contact with him during the
5:11
Speaker 1: course of the Hunter Biden investigation. So what do you
5:14
Speaker 1: think the Biden dojys didn't response, Well, here is their response.
5:21
Speaker 1: The Justice Department had hinted in a letter to Grassland
5:23
Speaker 1: Johnson in February of twenty twenty one, the McQuaid may
5:28
Speaker 1: have recused himself from the Hunter Biden case. May didn't
5:31
Speaker 1: give definite yes or no, although the agency did not
5:35
Speaker 1: say for certain, nor did it provide a recusal memo,
5:38
Speaker 1: which is traditional when you're recusing yourself from a case
5:42
Speaker 1: due to a conflict of interests. The acting Assistant Attorney
5:47
Speaker 1: in General is screened and recused from matters in which
5:52
Speaker 1: he is a financial interest or a personal business relationship,
5:56
Speaker 1: including matters involving his former law firm. The EJ wrote
6:01
Speaker 1: in that letter, again not answering the question, just giving you,
6:06
Speaker 1: by the book what happens. The attorney mcquayd appeared to
6:11
Speaker 1: depart the Justice Department less than a month before. David
6:15
Speaker 1: Weise held a meeting with investigators on the Hunter Biden
6:18
Speaker 1: investigation and informed them that the Department of Justice had
6:23
Speaker 1: denied his requests for special counsel status. He also said
6:28
Speaker 1: two other Joe Biden appointed US attorneys had blocked his
6:33
Speaker 1: ability to charge Hunter Biden outside of Delaware. That, according
6:37
Speaker 1: to two IRS whistleblowers who approached Congress this spring, now
6:42
Speaker 1: McQuaid is now once again, get this a lawyer. He's
6:47
Speaker 1: now back. He's once again a lawyer at Latham and Watkins,
6:51
Speaker 1: a firm helping to you, ready for this, defend Hunter
6:54
Speaker 1: Biden against the criminal charges he may soon face since
6:58
Speaker 1: the plea deal blew up. Mccuay did not represent Hunter Biden,
7:03
Speaker 1: nor have any involvement in the matter when he was
7:06
Speaker 1: a partner at Latham prior to joining the Department of
7:10
Speaker 1: Justice in twenty twenty one. That is what a Latham
7:13
Speaker 1: and Watkins spokesperson told the Washington Examiner. He also had
7:18
Speaker 1: no involvement in the Hunter Byde investigation while he was
7:21
Speaker 1: at the DOJ, and he has not represented mister Biden
7:26
Speaker 1: since returning to Latham. That doesn't mean he couldn't tell
7:30
Speaker 1: somebody down the hall. At the same wall firm, he
7:32
Speaker 1: works out everything the DJ is working on, or everything
7:34
Speaker 1: they're worried about, everything they're trying to cover up. I
7:37
Speaker 1: think we can all agree with that. I'm still in
7:42
Speaker 1: shock by this, the fact that we're even having this conversation.
7:46
Speaker 1: I'm shocked that this is how corrupt our DOJ is
7:48
Speaker 1: under the Biden administration, under Garland. I mean, if you
7:51
Speaker 1: want to talk about a full blown just department of
7:55
Speaker 1: not justice, but a department of corruption. This is it, folks. Now.
8:02
Speaker 1: At least three of hunter Biden's defense attorneys currently work
8:06
Speaker 1: at Leathan Watkins and Clark did as well until he
8:12
Speaker 1: left the firm in April to start his own firm.
8:15
Speaker 1: Clark withdrew from the Hunter Biden's defense team in anticipation
8:19
Speaker 1: of serving as a witness and a potential future challenge
8:22
Speaker 1: to the way that Weiss's office handled the botch plea
8:25
Speaker 1: agreement and attempt to offer hunter Biden a sweetheart deal
8:29
Speaker 1: with immunity in June. We also know that the DOJ
8:33
Speaker 1: provided the emails involving Weiss as part of the Freedom
8:37
Speaker 1: of Information Act lawsuit the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project filed
8:41
Speaker 1: earlier this year. Kyle bross None, chief counsel at Heritage's
8:47
Speaker 1: Oversight Projects, said the lawsuit seeks any documents related to
8:52
Speaker 1: the prospect of Weiss requesting special Council status, as well
8:57
Speaker 1: as any documents related to Weiss's at attempts to bring
9:01
Speaker 1: charges against hunter Biden outside his jurisdiction in Delaware. Now,
9:07
Speaker 1: Bronson Brustman, excuse me, brustonan said, the emails suggests Weiss
9:13
Speaker 1: was not permitted by the DOJ to answer questions about
9:17
Speaker 1: his work. In fact, they took that out of his hands,
9:19
Speaker 1: and they then decide to manipulate and decide what the
9:22
Speaker 1: answer would be. That quote significantly undercuts all the statements
9:27
Speaker 1: that the Attorney General Merrit Garland has said has made,
9:30
Speaker 1: swearing up and down that Weiss's investigation was independent. The
9:35
Speaker 1: Justice Department's officials found more than two thousand, five hundred
9:40
Speaker 1: documents responsive to the Freedom of Information Act request the
9:45
Speaker 1: DOJSON a court filing during the fully lawsuit. Many of
9:49
Speaker 1: the documents, such as the twenty seven pages of emails
9:52
Speaker 1: provided by the DOJ on Friday to the Heritage Foundation,
9:55
Speaker 1: are likely to be heavily redacted, but the emails are
9:58
Speaker 1: still significant because what whenever they do contain under the redactions,
10:03
Speaker 1: They are related to discussions that David Weiss and his
10:07
Speaker 1: prosecutor team had about the constraints placed on his office
10:13
Speaker 1: by the Justice Department, Which means the Justice Department and
10:16
Speaker 1: Merrick Garland lied to Congress as well as to the
10:19
Speaker 1: American people. All right, let me tell you real quick
10:22
Speaker 1: about an amazing company called Patriot Mobile for ten years,
10:26
Speaker 1: they have been America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, and
10:31
Speaker 1: when I say only trust me, they're the only one.
10:34
Speaker 1: Glenn and the team have been great supporters of this show,
10:37
Speaker 1: which is why I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile.
10:40
Speaker 1: They offer you dependable nationwide coverage, giving you the ability
10:44
Speaker 1: to access all three major networks, which means you get
10:47
Speaker 1: the same coverage you've been accustomed to without funding the
10:51
Speaker 1: leftist agenda. When you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're sending
10:54
Speaker 1: the message that you support free speech, religious freedom, sancty
10:58
Speaker 1: of life, Second Amendment, and are military, our veterans and
11:01
Speaker 1: first responder heroes. They have one hundred percent US based
11:04
Speaker 1: customer service team making switching easy. You get to keep
11:08
Speaker 1: your same cell phone number, keep your same phone that
11:10
Speaker 1: you have right now, keep your same phone, or upgrade
11:14
Speaker 1: to a new one, and their team will help you
11:16
Speaker 1: find the best plan for your needs and save you
11:18
Speaker 1: real money. You've got a small business, they can cover
11:21
Speaker 1: all that as well. All you need to do is
11:23
Speaker 1: go to Patriot Mobile dot com, slash ferguson, Patriotmobile dot
11:29
Speaker 1: com slash ferguson, or call them eight seven eight Patriot
11:32
Speaker 1: that's eight seven eight Patriot get free activation when you
11:34
Speaker 1: use the promo code ferguson. Join me and make the
11:37
Speaker 1: switch today and protect our values and stand for them
11:41
Speaker 1: with every phone call patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or
11:45
Speaker 1: eight seven eight Patriot.
11:47
Speaker 2: Now.
11:48
Speaker 1: These emails are significant because whatever they do contain under
11:52
Speaker 1: the reactions. As I mentioned a moment ago, this tells
11:56
Speaker 1: you that it was clear that the Biden administration and
12:00
Speaker 1: multiple congressional inquiries into what they were doing behind the scenes,
12:06
Speaker 1: they clearly were covering up aspects of Hunter byde investigation,
12:10
Speaker 1: and it's clear that they were protecting and not telling
12:14
Speaker 1: the truth about David Weiss and what he could and
12:16
Speaker 1: couldn't do. The other conflict of interest that really stands
12:20
Speaker 1: out to me is this President Joe Biden appointed mcquad
12:25
Speaker 1: to his position at the DOJ Criminal Division on his
12:27
Speaker 1: first day in office. The appointment quickly prompted scrutiny because
12:32
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden had hired Clark, who like mccuad, was a
12:36
Speaker 1: partner at Lathan Watkins at the time, to represent him
12:40
Speaker 1: just one month earlier. So a month before you become president,
12:43
Speaker 1: you hire a law firm to protect you because you
12:47
Speaker 1: know what's coming down the pipe. Then on the day
12:50
Speaker 1: that you become the president, you're sworn in, you take
12:52
Speaker 1: that same oier you put him at the DOJ. Now,
12:55
Speaker 1: the DOJ appears to have done little to address concerns
12:58
Speaker 1: about the role that mcquad may or may not have
13:00
Speaker 1: played in the Hunter Byte investigation beyond the February twenty
13:04
Speaker 1: first letter confirming that he had received ethics training and
13:08
Speaker 1: would hypothetically recuse himself from matters involving Latham and Watkins.
13:14
Speaker 1: During his tenure at the Justice Department, McQuay had visited
13:18
Speaker 1: the White House at least three times. White House visitor
13:20
Speaker 1: logs also now show this is actually the easiest scheme
13:25
Speaker 1: to figure out. You got a guy you hire one
13:29
Speaker 1: month before you become president. Clearly you know that he's
13:33
Speaker 1: going to get a job at your DOJ on the
13:36
Speaker 1: first day you are sworn in, and that's obvious. So
13:39
Speaker 1: you hire him for thirty days while preparing him for
13:42
Speaker 1: his next job, so he can see both sides of
13:44
Speaker 1: what's going on. He can be on the side of defense,
13:47
Speaker 1: and then he can go and try to figure out
13:49
Speaker 1: how to protect that same client from the inside at
13:53
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. Now, for me, this is more
13:56
Speaker 1: significant than even the money that's been coming into the
13:59
Speaker 1: Biden crime family that I'm just being honest here. This
14:07
Speaker 1: was a cover up from the moment he won. Okay,
14:10
Speaker 1: Like that's what this was. This was a cover up
14:14
Speaker 1: by the Biden family, and the Biden crime family knew
14:17
Speaker 1: what they needed to do to protect themselves after they won.
14:20
Speaker 1: The moment they won, they said, Okay, what do we do.
14:22
Speaker 1: Who's our team, who's our legal team. Who do we
14:24
Speaker 1: need to get on the inside. I mean, this is
14:26
Speaker 1: no different than than sending a nark into an organization
14:33
Speaker 1: to get you intel. They were working both sides of this.
14:36
Speaker 1: Their narc was the attorney they hired thirty days before
14:39
Speaker 1: to represent them. Who then they're like, no, no, we
14:42
Speaker 1: got a better idea here, right like, we got it,
14:44
Speaker 1: We got a way better idea here. Let's hire you
14:48
Speaker 1: as attorney. Okay, great for thirty days, and then we're
14:51
Speaker 1: going to hire you to work at the Department of
14:52
Speaker 1: Justice as soon as we're sworn in. Okay, great. So
14:54
Speaker 1: make sure you understand the case, makesure you know everything
14:57
Speaker 1: from the outside, then bring all that knowledge the inside
14:59
Speaker 1: and that help us defend this on the inside and
15:01
Speaker 1: they said okay, great, and that's what they did. That's
15:08
Speaker 1: a simple way to recap this. Now you combine this
15:13
Speaker 1: with the new intel that Hunter Biden was on all
15:16
Speaker 1: these trips with his dad and other family members and
15:20
Speaker 1: they were making money when they were flying on Air
15:22
Speaker 1: Force two and Marine two around the world to twenty
15:27
Speaker 1: plus different countries, which is, by the way, completely insane.
15:31
Speaker 1: But Hunter Biden was on these planes working these deals,
15:34
Speaker 1: and we now know that information. Listen to James Comer
15:37
Speaker 1: on Hannity last night talking exactly about this.
15:40
Speaker 3: Let's talk about these trips some fifteen. I think you've
15:43
Speaker 3: confirmed that Hunter Biden flies with Daddy. I know Peter
15:47
Speaker 3: Sweitzer makes the case and secret empires that two weeks
15:51
Speaker 3: after Hunter flew with his father to Asia and stopped
15:56
Speaker 3: in China, then the Bank of China the one billion
15:59
Speaker 3: dollar deal that became one point five billion.
16:01
Speaker 2: Dollar deal was struck.
16:03
Speaker 3: As far as we have been able to find, Hunter
16:05
Speaker 3: has no experience in that, just like he has no
16:08
Speaker 3: experience and energy. Do you believe that Hunter was enriching
16:11
Speaker 3: himself on these trips viz a viv the free travel
16:15
Speaker 3: of his father.
16:18
Speaker 4: There's no question Hunter Biden was enriching himself and his
16:21
Speaker 4: family while riding on Air Force two at the expense
16:25
Speaker 4: of the American taxpayer. But what's more concerning is what
16:28
Speaker 4: Joe Biden's role was in all of this. And again, Sean,
16:31
Speaker 4: this is an investigation of Joe Biden. And what we're
16:34
Speaker 4: doing now is we're putting a timeline together on all
16:37
Speaker 4: these bank transfers that we've identified, all the bank wires.
16:44
Speaker 4: We're trying to now put a timeline with communications that
16:48
Speaker 4: Hunter had with his father, with his so called associates,
16:52
Speaker 4: and we're finding that now he was on Air Force too,
16:56
Speaker 4: a whole lot more than anyone thought. So Joe Biden's
16:59
Speaker 4: role in this family influence peddling scheme continues to grow
17:04
Speaker 4: on a daily basis.
17:05
Speaker 2: I mean, he was front and center in this.
17:07
Speaker 4: They can claim plausible deniability all they want, but I
17:11
Speaker 4: am here to tell you, Sean, Joe Biden was front
17:14
Speaker 4: and center.
17:14
Speaker 2: He met with every one.
17:15
Speaker 4: Of these people that he claimed he never met with
17:17
Speaker 4: and never spoke to. And we're putting together the timeline
17:21
Speaker 4: where Hunter Biden was traveling to many of these countries
17:24
Speaker 4: on Air Force Too while Joe Biden was Vice President.
17:27
Speaker 2: And now we know from emails.
17:29
Speaker 1: I mean, you look at this, it was clear. All
17:33
Speaker 1: the dots are there, The financial dots are there, the
17:37
Speaker 1: financial transactions, the money actually going into the bank accounts,
17:43
Speaker 1: the travel dates connected to them. There's another aspect of
17:48
Speaker 1: this story as well. And I want to go back
17:51
Speaker 1: to James Comer on Joe Biden, and this goes back
17:54
Speaker 1: to receiving these alias emails, and these emails pertained to Ukraine,
17:59
Speaker 1: and the fact that he had had these Burner email accounts.
18:02
Speaker 1: And I want you to listen very carefully to what
18:05
Speaker 1: now James Comer is saying about those emails. He said
18:08
Speaker 1: to Bria Bartiromo, I.
18:09
Speaker 5: Want to get the state of affairs of your investigation,
18:12
Speaker 5: given we have a new special Council now in the
18:14
Speaker 5: Hunter Biden investigation. But first let's discuss these pseudonyms or
18:18
Speaker 5: alias names. What exactly have you learned.
18:23
Speaker 4: Well, we've learned that Joe Biden used at least three
18:27
Speaker 4: pseudonyms or fake names in emails that he was receiving
18:32
Speaker 4: from people within the federal government, people that worked for him.
18:35
Speaker 4: And even more troubling than that, Maria, we've learned that
18:39
Speaker 4: when he was receiving emails pertaining to Ukraine. His son
18:44
Speaker 4: Hunter was copied on them, which we've always heard that
18:47
Speaker 4: the White House has said that Hunter Biden wasn't an
18:50
Speaker 4: employee of the government.
18:51
Speaker 2: He wasn't any part of the government.
18:52
Speaker 4: They couldn't understand why House Republicans on the Oversight Committee
18:55
Speaker 4: were investigating Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, because
18:59
Speaker 4: Hunter wasn't a part of the government. If that were true,
19:01
Speaker 4: then why was he receiving emails from the government.
19:05
Speaker 5: Well, this also pertains to the firing of the special
19:10
Speaker 5: prosecutor in Ukraine, Victor Choken. Was that what these emails
19:15
Speaker 5: were about, because you have told us in the past
19:18
Speaker 5: that that was one decision you were looking at as
19:20
Speaker 5: far as a decision that Joe Biden may have been
19:23
Speaker 5: paid for to get involved in getting that prosecutor off
19:27
Speaker 5: the back of Barisma.
19:30
Speaker 4: I think the evidence is mounting every day to proof
19:33
Speaker 4: that Joe Biden went to Ukraine for the sole purpose
19:36
Speaker 4: of firing Choken, who was the Ukrainian prosecutor who was
19:40
Speaker 4: investigating his son for corruption. What we heard in the
19:43
Speaker 4: transcribed interview with Devin Archer was that he said that
19:46
Speaker 4: the owners of Barisma were squeezing Hunter saying we need
19:50
Speaker 4: help in Washington. You need to call Washington for help.
19:54
Speaker 4: Of course, the Democrats tried to say that, well, that
19:56
Speaker 4: could have been anybody in Washington. Well, what we've now
19:58
Speaker 4: learned is Joe Biden, was you using a fake email
20:01
Speaker 4: name to receive correspondence from his staff that he was
20:04
Speaker 4: copying Hunter Biden on. And I believe Maria that Hunter
20:08
Speaker 4: had to prove value to the Barisma owners that they
20:12
Speaker 4: were working on this, so he was forwarding those to
20:16
Speaker 4: the owners of Barisma.
20:17
Speaker 2: Look, this is obvious that Joe Biden.
20:20
Speaker 4: Abused his power as vice president for the sole purpose
20:24
Speaker 4: to protect his son, who was receiving millions of millions
20:27
Speaker 4: of dollars from this corrupt Ukrainian energy company. And this
20:31
Speaker 4: email ties Joe Biden and Hunter Biden into this corruption
20:35
Speaker 4: scheme without a shadow of a.
20:36
Speaker 1: Doubt, without a shadow of adult If you were an
20:45
Speaker 1: outsider from another country and you just listened to the
20:50
Speaker 1: last thirty minutes of what I just laid out for you,
20:55
Speaker 1: and you knew nothing about the Biden case before, now,
20:59
Speaker 1: like not a single thing. Okay, this is all you'd
21:02
Speaker 1: ever heard. What you would have gotten just from the
21:06
Speaker 1: evidence that we have from this week is that Joe
21:10
Speaker 1: Biden was going overseas to Ukraine twenty plus times for
21:14
Speaker 1: only one reason to get a guy fired, and they
21:16
Speaker 1: were giving him ten million dollars on the back end
21:18
Speaker 1: to do that, holding up your tax dollars American loan guarantees.
21:22
Speaker 1: That's number one. You would also find out that the
21:24
Speaker 1: then vice president was so shady and corrupt that he
21:28
Speaker 1: had burner email accounts and burner phones. He had a
21:33
Speaker 1: global phone, satellite phone in essence that he has answered
21:37
Speaker 1: that phone actually recently when that number was found out
21:41
Speaker 1: by a journalist and the journalists called, and guess who answered.
21:45
Speaker 1: Guess who answered? The sitting president United Hits of America,
21:48
Speaker 1: not the vice president. This isn't years ago, this is now.
21:50
Speaker 1: This phone is still in use, or at least it
21:53
Speaker 1: was a few weeks ago. You would find out that
21:57
Speaker 1: you had a president that was sending his son information
22:01
Speaker 1: to give to his coworkers at Barisma so that they
22:08
Speaker 1: would know what was going on with the investigation and
22:10
Speaker 1: what was going on with America and what they were
22:14
Speaker 1: going to do to try to get the guy fired
22:16
Speaker 1: who was investigating them. You would also learn that there
22:20
Speaker 1: were other countries that they were making money off of.
22:22
Speaker 1: This is just in the last thirty minutes that the
22:27
Speaker 1: vice president was saying to his son and family members
22:29
Speaker 1: and business associates. Right, not just family members, but also
22:32
Speaker 1: those that were on the for example, on the board
22:34
Speaker 1: of Barisma. Never forget that, okay, never ever, ever, ever, ever,
22:39
Speaker 1: ever forget that they were telling them information, giving them
22:44
Speaker 1: intel folks, giving them information, and letting them get deals done,
22:51
Speaker 1: making them millions of dollars. If you were in business
22:55
Speaker 1: with the Biden crime family, whether you're a family member
22:57
Speaker 1: or not, you had one hundred percent sent access. You
23:03
Speaker 1: had complete and total access to Marine one, and you
23:06
Speaker 1: had complete and total access to Air Force two. I
23:11
Speaker 1: should say in Marine two anywhere in the world that
23:14
Speaker 1: you need to get off the plane and send a
23:16
Speaker 1: message that this is how close I am with a
23:18
Speaker 1: vice president, because look, I've been around presidential administrations. It's
23:21
Speaker 1: when you walk off of Air Force one. Okay, when
23:24
Speaker 1: you walk off of Marine one, you don't need a
23:27
Speaker 1: resume in that moment. It's clear that you have access.
23:32
Speaker 1: You can't just get on those planes by accident. When
23:36
Speaker 1: you have access to the Oval office, when you have
23:38
Speaker 1: access to Marine one. When you have access to air
23:40
Speaker 1: Force one, especially if you're trying to sell influence pedaling
23:43
Speaker 1: around the world, your calling card is Hey, I'm coming
23:47
Speaker 1: to town, love to meet with you. I'm flying with
23:50
Speaker 1: my father, the Vice president, on air Force one, on
23:54
Speaker 1: air Force two, and on Marine two, and I'll be
23:56
Speaker 1: getting off that plane with him, and then we're going
23:59
Speaker 1: to have a meeting. And then when I get back
24:01
Speaker 1: on the plane, it's very clear what you're selling. I'm
24:04
Speaker 1: going to talk to my dad about it on the
24:05
Speaker 1: way home on our sixteen hour, nine hour eleven hour flight.
24:09
Speaker 1: Because it's international flight, it's going to be a longer flight.
24:12
Speaker 1: We'll see you in a few days. If you work
24:16
Speaker 1: for the Biden crime family, you had access to that plane.
24:19
Speaker 1: If you were the Sun who was running this business
24:22
Speaker 1: scheme for the big guy, you obviously had access to
24:26
Speaker 1: that plane more than twenty trips. You can now connect
24:30
Speaker 1: the dots to the financial gains of the Biden crime family.
24:34
Speaker 1: That's one hell of a way to run a business.
24:36
Speaker 1: And the best part is you don't have to pay
24:38
Speaker 1: for it if you're the Bidens. The US taxpayers did.
24:43
Speaker 1: Now let me say one last thing about this investigation.
24:46
Speaker 1: Because I know many of you are probably really angry
24:49
Speaker 1: about it, as I am. But is there going to
24:52
Speaker 1: be a payoff? Right?
24:54
Speaker 4: Like?
24:54
Speaker 1: Is there going to be a point where this starts
24:56
Speaker 1: to turn the other way. Let me let you hear
24:59
Speaker 1: what James com had to say to Larry Kudlow on
25:03
Speaker 1: Fox Business about what's next and what's gonna happen next,
25:08
Speaker 1: because there's liabilities out there that are now being forced
25:12
Speaker 1: to talk because Republicans are in control of the House.
25:15
Speaker 1: One of those is his business partner, Eric Sweerin, And
25:18
Speaker 1: this is what James Comer had to say about him
25:21
Speaker 1: coming before Congress.
25:22
Speaker 6: Now, Chairman, you know you mentioned Devin he was kind
25:27
Speaker 6: of the gatekeeper. Now you've got I think on the
25:31
Speaker 6: docket and I'm inntioned in when he's going to testify.
25:34
Speaker 6: Everybody's asking you when's Hunter going to testify? But I'm
25:37
Speaker 6: more interested right now in Eric Schwerin, who is kind.
25:40
Speaker 2: Of the bookkeeper. He wrote checks, he.
25:43
Speaker 6: Was in charge of taxes, and there's a joint account.
25:46
Speaker 6: And this is so important because that joint account reaches
25:49
Speaker 6: in to then Vice President Joe Biden and maybe still
25:54
Speaker 6: to this day President Biden. When do you get Missus
25:56
Speaker 6: Schwerin and what angles you think you're going to pursue with.
26:01
Speaker 4: Well, he's going to come in very soon and have
26:03
Speaker 4: an opportunity under oath to answer questions. There have been
26:07
Speaker 4: some initial communication between Sherwin and our office, but you know,
26:12
Speaker 4: he holds a lot of answers to our questions. He
26:16
Speaker 4: obviously met with the President countless times in the White
26:21
Speaker 4: House when Joe Biden was vice president, when Obama was president,
26:25
Speaker 4: he did the books for Joe Biden. He apparently had
26:28
Speaker 4: the authority to deposit checks and write checks on behalf
26:32
Speaker 4: of Joe Biden. And his name is also affiliated with
26:35
Speaker 4: some of these shell companies.
26:36
Speaker 2: So Sherwin has a lot of knowledge.
26:39
Speaker 4: And you know, it's been very difficult Larry to bring
26:42
Speaker 4: these people in because again, what was the business. The
26:46
Speaker 4: business was influence peddling, and that's kind of illegal because
26:49
Speaker 4: that would require you to be a red shirt foreign
26:52
Speaker 4: agent if that's what they were doing. And the fact
26:55
Speaker 4: that they were putting Joe Biden on the phone and
26:58
Speaker 4: possibly coming funds with Joe Biden, that puts Joe Biden
27:03
Speaker 4: in a very very bad place at the end of
27:06
Speaker 4: this investigation.
27:07
Speaker 2: So Sherwin is someone that's.
27:09
Speaker 4: Going to come in front of the committee and he's
27:10
Speaker 4: going to have an opportunity to tell the truth, just
27:12
Speaker 4: like Devin Archer did awen pursuit.
27:16
Speaker 1: Not only is he going to come in as it
27:18
Speaker 1: was just described there by James Comer, but James Comer
27:21
Speaker 1: has also now come out and said that he is
27:23
Speaker 1: going to subpoena the Biden family members. Listen to how
27:29
Speaker 1: he described this as part of the new plan to
27:31
Speaker 1: bring them coming forward into Congress, making sure that hey,
27:35
Speaker 1: we're going to hear from them.
27:38
Speaker 4: Yeah, this is always going to end with the Bidens
27:41
Speaker 4: coming in front of the committee. We are going to
27:44
Speaker 4: subpoena as the family. I mean, we're putting the case
27:47
Speaker 4: together to win in court. Obviously, with all the opposition
27:50
Speaker 4: and obstruction we're getting from the Biden attorneys, now we
27:54
Speaker 4: know that this is going to end up in court
27:56
Speaker 4: when Lee subpoena the Biden So we're putting together a
27:58
Speaker 4: case and I think we've.
27:59
Speaker 2: Done that very well. We've shown the bank records.
28:02
Speaker 4: If I had subpoena Joe and Hunter Biden the first
28:05
Speaker 4: day I became chairman of the committee, it would have
28:07
Speaker 4: been tied up in court and the judge would have
28:09
Speaker 4: eventually thrown it out because at that time the narrative was, well,
28:11
Speaker 4: they never took any money while he was by president,
28:13
Speaker 4: He never had any communication with his business associates, and the.
28:18
Speaker 2: Money never came from China.
28:19
Speaker 4: We've had to go every step of the way improved
28:22
Speaker 4: the media narrative was wrong, and the vice president and
28:25
Speaker 4: the current president lied. We have caught Joe Biden in
28:29
Speaker 4: so many lives I can't even count.
28:31
Speaker 2: The number of lies now.
28:32
Speaker 4: So we have put together a case that I think
28:35
Speaker 4: would stand up in any court of law in America.
28:38
Speaker 4: And we hope to hear from the Biden too. But
28:40
Speaker 4: I wish the media would ask the president what exactly
28:44
Speaker 4: did your family do to receive this twenty one million dollars?
28:47
Speaker 4: At the House Oversight Committee has proven he.
28:50
Speaker 2: Just continues to say, Well, that's a lie, that's not true.
28:52
Speaker 4: We have their bank records, Maria bank records, don't lie.
28:56
Speaker 5: Caisman, when are you expecting to subpoena Joe and Hunter Biden.
29:01
Speaker 4: Well, we want to talk to about three or four
29:03
Speaker 4: more associates. First, We've been communicating with a couple of them.
29:07
Speaker 4: We're trying to bring them in just like we did
29:09
Speaker 4: Devin Archer for a transcribed interview. If they don't come
29:12
Speaker 4: in voluntarily, then they'll be subpoena. So this is taking
29:17
Speaker 4: a lot longer. But if you look at how the
29:19
Speaker 4: Special Council.
29:20
Speaker 2: Durham or other special councils.
29:23
Speaker 4: Conducted investigations, I think our committee is going a whole
29:26
Speaker 4: lot faster than any other Congressional committee in history and
29:30
Speaker 4: any other special council. This is a complicated case, and
29:33
Speaker 4: we're being obstructed every step of the way by the
29:36
Speaker 4: Department of Justice, by the FBI, by the Secret Service, by.
29:39
Speaker 2: The RS, and by the Biden family attorneys plan. But
29:42
Speaker 2: that's not stopping us. We continue to produce evidence about
29:45
Speaker 2: every two weeks.
29:46
Speaker 5: Well, we would not know any of this without your work,
29:49
Speaker 5: So thank you for exposing all of this. Have you
29:51
Speaker 5: been able to identify more policy decisions that Joe Biden
29:56
Speaker 5: made to placate these farms?
29:58
Speaker 1: By the way, listen this very carefully question. She's asking,
30:01
Speaker 1: have you found more policy decisions that were made besides
30:05
Speaker 1: like firing Victor Shokin in Ukraine to get paid. Listen
30:09
Speaker 1: to his answer.
30:10
Speaker 5: Earners for giving him money. I mean, I'm trying to
30:13
Speaker 5: get to the fact of what exactly he's being paid for,
30:16
Speaker 5: and I understand it maybe in some cases that it's
30:18
Speaker 5: just influenced, you know, him writing a letter to Devon
30:21
Speaker 5: Archer saying, I'm sorry it couldn't get you sooner.
30:23
Speaker 2: I had to host the.
30:24
Speaker 5: President of China in that letter that he sent to
30:27
Speaker 5: Devon Archer, but thanks for working with Hunter.
30:29
Speaker 2: Great to see you. I hope you enjoyed the lunch.
30:31
Speaker 5: There's the letter right now on fancy vice presidential stationery.
30:36
Speaker 5: What are the decisions that he made that perhaps he
30:39
Speaker 5: got paid for in addition to the show Caun prosecute
30:42
Speaker 5: of firing.
30:44
Speaker 4: Well, one of the documents that we released yesterday showed
30:48
Speaker 4: three and a half million dollar payment from a Russian oligart.
30:52
Speaker 4: And then when Russia invaded Ukraine, the President was quick
30:56
Speaker 4: to put sanctions on all the Russian oligarchs except one,
31:00
Speaker 4: the one person who sent his family three and a
31:03
Speaker 4: half million dollars. So that would be hard to explain.
31:06
Speaker 4: We would like to ask the president why he didn't
31:09
Speaker 4: put the sanctions on the wife of the former mayor
31:13
Speaker 4: of Moscow who sent his son three and a half
31:16
Speaker 4: million dollars, And we cited that bank transfer and our
31:20
Speaker 4: memo yesterday. That's a pretty big decision that I believe
31:23
Speaker 4: you could make a strong argument Maria was made because
31:26
Speaker 4: his family took the money.
31:27
Speaker 2: That's the only.
31:28
Speaker 4: Oligarch that was left off the sanctions list.
31:33
Speaker 1: The only oligarch that was left off the sanctions list
31:37
Speaker 1: is the oligarch to this date, by the way, to
31:39
Speaker 1: today as of now, like every time they keep coming
31:41
Speaker 1: out with new sanctions, and every time they come out
31:43
Speaker 1: with new sanctions, guess who's left off. The richest woman
31:46
Speaker 1: in Russia, the Russian oligarch whose former husband was the
31:50
Speaker 1: mayor of Moscow. She has not been sanctioned. You want
31:53
Speaker 1: to know why. I think we all know why, because
31:55
Speaker 1: she's spent our sin I should say, at least three
31:58
Speaker 1: and a half million dollars buying off the Biden crime family.
32:05
Speaker 1: Please share this podcast with your family and friends. Make
32:09
Speaker 1: sure you write us a five star review wherever you're
32:11
Speaker 1: listening to this podcast, so that it will help us
32:14
Speaker 1: reach more people. And we will see you back here tomorrow.