Latest / Connecting the Dots / SpaceX's AI Ambitions, Cursor's Quiet Rise, and xAI's National Security Role

Transcript

SpaceX's AI Ambitions, Cursor's Quiet Rise, and xAI's National Security Role · Connecting the Dots

• 0:00
  Today's tech news moves fast, but understanding
• 0:03
  it shouldn't be hard. That's why Snarfle Solutions
• 0:06
  Group brings you Connecting the Dots, where we
• 0:09
  break down what's happening in tech and why it
• 0:11
  matters to you. Now, let's dive in with your
• 0:14
  hosts. Imagine trying to just breathe in your
• 0:19
  local neighborhood. only to discover that the
• 0:22
  thick air is coming from an unpermitted power
• 0:25
  plant right next door. Right. Now imagine the
• 0:27
  federal government stepping in and telling you
• 0:29
  that breathing clean air is actually a threat
• 0:31
  to national security. It's, um, it's wild. It
• 0:35
  is. We are looking at the true physical cost
• 0:38
  of the artificial intelligence boom today. Welcome
• 0:41
  to Connecting the Dots, a daily show from Snarfl
• 0:44
  Solutions Group coming to you from Sacramento,
• 0:46
  California, where we break down the latest tech
• 0:48
  news and explain its everyday impact. I'm Alex.
• 0:51
  And I'm Morgan. And today is Tuesday, June 16th,
• 0:55
  2026. So before we get to the core of what we're
• 0:58
  going to unpack today, let's let's take a quick
• 1:00
  look at the weather and the markets. Sounds good.
• 1:02
  If you're here in Sacramento with us, you are
• 1:04
  looking at beautiful sunny skies today. We're
• 1:06
  hitting a high of 93 degrees with, you know,
• 1:09
  a pretty light breeze, somewhere between 3 to
• 1:10
  12 miles per hour. Perfect summer weather, really.
• 1:13
  Exactly. Nationally, though, things are a bit
• 1:16
  more turbulent. There are currently 196 active
• 1:19
  U .S. weather alerts with 161 of those over land.
• 1:23
  So definitely check weather .gov if you are traveling
• 1:25
  today. Yeah, you don't want to get caught in
• 1:27
  that. And looking at the financial updates, we
• 1:30
  saw some massive trading volumes yesterday on
• 1:32
  Monday. Yeah, heavy action. Really heavy. The
• 1:35
  Dow Jones saw over 509 million shares traded,
• 1:38
  and the S &P 500 moved over 3 .39 billion shares.
• 1:42
  Wow. And you know, crypto is having a pretty
• 1:44
  solid Tuesday as well. Oh, yeah? Yeah, Bitcoin
• 1:46
  closed at $66 ,055 .36. That is up over $345
• 1:51
  for the day. And actually, those heavy market
• 1:54
  volumes we saw on Monday are directly tied to
• 1:56
  the overarching theme we are tracking today.
• 1:58
  Right, the rapid expansion of Elon Musk's tech
• 2:02
  empire. Exactly, specifically the newly public
• 2:05
  integration of SpaceX and XAI. Yeah, the consolidation
• 2:07
  happening under that umbrella is just, it's staggering.
• 2:10
  And it's completely reshaping how our digital
• 2:12
  infrastructure operates. See, but I'm struggling
• 2:14
  to reconcile the brand identity with the business
• 2:16
  moves here. How so? Well, when you hear SpaceX,
• 2:19
  you think of Mars exploration. You think of rocket
• 2:22
  boosters landing on barges. Sure. Yet suddenly
• 2:25
  this space company is completely dominating the
• 2:27
  news cycle regarding like software coding tools
• 2:30
  and local power grids. I just, I don't see the
• 2:33
  through line. Like why is a rocket manufacturer
• 2:36
  spending billions to buy up coding software?
• 2:39
  It seems disconnected. It does. How do those
• 2:42
  dots actually connect for you and me? Well, it
• 2:44
  seems like a massive pivot on the surface, but
• 2:46
  it actually makes complete sense when you look
• 2:48
  at the underlying architecture of modern tech.
• 2:50
  OK, lay it out for me. SpaceX isn't just focused
• 2:53
  on physical space anymore. They're positioning
• 2:56
  themselves to own the foundational layer of how
• 2:59
  all future software is built. Wow, OK, we will
• 3:02
  absolutely look closer at the mechanics of that
• 3:04
  strategy in just a second. But first, today's
• 3:07
  episode is brought to you by Strong Coffee. The
• 3:09
  premium instant coffee that tastes like a traditional
• 3:11
  brew but is packed with 15 grams of protein,
• 3:13
  MCTs, and adaptogens like ashwagandha get clean,
• 3:17
  sustained energy without the jitters. Use promo
• 3:20
  code SNARFL for 20 % off at strongcoffeecompany
• 3:23
  .com. All right, so let's examine the financial
• 3:25
  architecture of this shift. Let's do it. We just
• 3:27
  got confirmation via an SEC filing, which, you
• 3:30
  know, is... The legally binding paperwork public
• 3:33
  companies have to submit to financial regulators,
• 3:36
  right? So the filing shows SpaceX is officially
• 3:39
  acquiring any seri. That's the parent company
• 3:42
  of the AI coding startup cursor. Okay. And the
• 3:45
  price tag is just, it's a staggering $60 billion.
• 3:48
  The deal is slated to close in the third quarter
• 3:50
  of 2026. Wait, I am, I'm trying to make the math
• 3:53
  work on that valuation. $60 billion for a coding
• 3:55
  assistant. Yeah, it's a huge number. I mean,
• 3:58
  Microsoft already has VS Code, which has dominated
• 4:00
  the market for years. What does Kerscher actually
• 4:03
  have under the hood that justifies that kind
• 4:05
  of premium? So to understand the premium, you
• 4:08
  have to factor in what SpaceX recently became.
• 4:11
  They just completed a massive IPO. Right, their
• 4:14
  initial public offering. Exactly, making their
• 4:16
  stock available to the public. And that could
• 4:18
  value the company as high as $1 .75 trillion.
• 4:21
  Trillion, with a T. With a T. But leading up
• 4:24
  to that IPO, SpaceX formally absorbed XAI, which
• 4:29
  is the artificial intelligence company that developed
• 4:31
  the Grok chatbot. Oh, okay. Now, Cursor has arguably
• 4:35
  the best coding interface on the market, but
• 4:37
  they have hit a severe ceiling when it comes
• 4:39
  to compute power. By joining SpaceX, Cursor suddenly
• 4:43
  gets the keys to XAI's Colossus supercomputer.
• 4:46
  Ah, and Colossus is essentially a machine with
• 4:48
  the equivalent processing power of 1 million
• 4:51
  NVIDIA H100 chips working in tandem. Precisely.
• 4:55
  Just to put that into perspective for you listening,
• 4:57
  a single H100 chip is basically the gold standard
• 5:00
  for AI processing right now. They are incredibly
• 5:02
  expensive, highly specialized pieces of hardware.
• 5:05
  Very specialized. Yeah, they're designed specifically
• 5:07
  to handle complex machine learning algorithms.
• 5:10
  So having a million of them linked together creates
• 5:13
  almost unfathomable computing power. It is essentially
• 5:16
  the most powerful synthetic brain on the planet.
• 5:19
  It really is. And Cursor gets to use it to train
• 5:21
  the world's best coding AI. Yep. And the terms
• 5:25
  of the acquisition heavily underscore how vital
• 5:28
  that compute power is in this industry right
• 5:31
  now. There is a very unique termination clause
• 5:34
  in a contract. What is it? If the deal falls
• 5:37
  through for any reason, SpaceX owes Cursor a
• 5:41
  $10 billion breakup fee. Wow! But that penalty
• 5:45
  is broken down as 1 .5 billion dollars in cash
• 5:47
  and 8 .5 billion dollars in free computing power.
• 5:51
  That is wild, which tells you everything you
• 5:53
  need to know about the current tech economy,
• 5:55
  honestly. Exactly. For an AI startup, raw computing
• 5:58
  power is a currency that is far more valuable
• 6:00
  than actual cash. But let's bring this down to
• 6:02
  the ground level. Away from the billions of dollars
• 6:05
  in the massive supercomputers, the sources point
• 6:07
  to a massive industry shift toward a concept
• 6:10
  called vibe coding. What does that actually mean
• 6:13
  for the everyday working professional? OK. So
• 6:16
  historically, software engineering required developers
• 6:19
  to manually type out thousands of lines of incredibly
• 6:24
  precise syntax. Right. The classic hacker typing
• 6:27
  furiously at a keyboard. Exactly. And if you
• 6:30
  missed a single bracket or a semicolon, the whole
• 6:33
  application would crash. Didn't there? Right.
• 6:35
  But vibe coding fundamentally changes that dynamic.
• 6:38
  Instead of writing syntax, you use natural language.
• 6:41
  You literally just describe the function or the
• 6:43
  vibe of the app you want to build. But you just
• 6:45
  talk to it. Basically, yeah. You give a plain
• 6:48
  English description, and the AI translates that
• 6:50
  into perfectly formatted code. So it's kind of
• 6:53
  the difference between being a brick layer and
• 6:55
  an architect. That's a great way to put it. Because
• 6:57
  before, you had to manually place every single
• 6:59
  brick, making sure it was perfectly aligned with
• 7:01
  the mortar. Now with vibe coding you just sketch
• 7:05
  the blueprint and these large language models
• 7:08
  predict the correct sequence of code Laying millions
• 7:11
  of digital bricks for you instantly instantly
• 7:13
  and flawlessly for the most part which means
• 7:16
  coding is shifting from this highly specialized
• 7:19
  niche luxury to a mandatory everyday tool I mean,
• 7:24
  if a business can build an internal application
• 7:26
  in two days instead of two months, the cost of
• 7:29
  software development plummets. Oh, and time.
• 7:31
  It makes technology infinitely cheaper for families
• 7:34
  and small businesses. So going back to SpaceX,
• 7:37
  I guess it's like a car manufacturer buying the
• 7:40
  company that paves the highways. Yes. They aren't
• 7:42
  just building the vehicles anymore. They're trying
• 7:44
  to own the infrastructure of how all software
• 7:46
  is built. Exactly. SpaceX recognized that shift.
• 7:49
  They are essentially acquiring the toll booth.
• 7:52
  to the future of software development. That is
• 7:54
  brilliant. Right. If every developer in the world
• 7:56
  relies on cursor to write their code, then SpaceX
• 8:01
  effectively has a hand in every single piece
• 8:04
  of software being created. They become the bedrock.
• 8:07
  But SpaceX doesn't just hand over a 60 billion
• 8:10
  dollar valuation and the keys to the world's
• 8:12
  most powerful supercomputer to just anyone. No,
• 8:15
  they certainly do not. The architect behind this
• 8:18
  infrastructural play is a 25 year old CEO named
• 8:20
  Michael Trull and the human drama behind his
• 8:24
  rise is Honestly, incredibly intense. It's a
• 8:27
  fascinating story. Trull is an MIT graduate,
• 8:30
  reportedly deeply introverted, but fiercely ambitious.
• 8:33
  I mean, at 15 years old, he built this coding
• 8:35
  game called Halite, where players conquer the
• 8:38
  universe. At 15. Right. And right out of college,
• 8:41
  he co -founded Cursor with his friends with a
• 8:43
  very specific goal to dethrone Microsoft's VS
• 8:47
  Code, which was the undisputed heavyweight champion
• 8:49
  of code editors at the time. And he practically
• 8:51
  did. Yeah. But Cursor didn't build this empire
• 8:54
  independently. No, they didn't. They had a highly
• 8:57
  interdependent, almost symbiotic relationship
• 8:59
  with Anthropic, which is another major AI giant.
• 9:02
  Right, the makers of Claude. Exactly. Early on,
• 9:05
  Cursor relied entirely on Anthropic's foundational
• 9:08
  AI models to provide the cognitive engine for
• 9:12
  their coding tools. OK, so they were the brain.
• 9:15
  Right. And at one point, Cursor was driving roughly
• 9:18
  40 to 50 percent of Anthropic's early revenue.
• 9:21
  Wait, really? Almost half. Yeah, it was huge
• 9:24
  cursor needed the AI brain and Anthropic desperately
• 9:28
  needed the massive user base and the cash flow
• 9:30
  Okay, so it was a perfect partnership until the
• 9:33
  business reality set in always the case Anthropic
• 9:36
  launched its own blockbuster coding product called
• 9:38
  Claude Code. And according to the sources, Anthropic
• 9:41
  executives had privately reassured Trull that
• 9:44
  Claude Code was merely a research effort. Ah,
• 9:47
  the classic, don't worry about this little side
• 9:49
  project. Exactly. But the moment it went live,
• 9:52
  developers started jumping ship. Anthropic's
• 9:54
  revenue run rate shot up to $2 .5 billion almost
• 9:57
  overnight, leaving Cursor incredibly vulnerable.
• 10:00
  I mean, that is the ultimate existential threat
• 10:03
  for a tech startup. Oh, absolutely. If the company
• 10:05
  supplying your core technology suddenly becomes
• 10:08
  your direct competitor, your business model evaporates
• 10:11
  instantly because they have direct access to
• 10:14
  the underlying tech, and you are just a middleman.
• 10:18
  Right. And Trull, he didn't hesitate. He called
• 10:21
  an emergency all -hands meeting in January. Panic
• 10:24
  mode. Yeah, he canceled all unnecessary meetings,
• 10:27
  reassigned teams immediately, and told the staff
• 10:30
  they had to build their own model to survive.
• 10:33
  they could no longer rely on Anthropix architecture.
• 10:36
  So what did they do? Their solution was to build
• 10:38
  what they called composer models. But rather
• 10:41
  than starting completely from scratch, which,
• 10:44
  you know, would have taken years, billions of
• 10:46
  dollars they didn't have, they utilized open
• 10:48
  source models from a Chinese AI lab called Moonshot.
• 10:52
  Okay, so open source, meaning the foundational
• 10:54
  code is publicly available for developers to
• 10:56
  modify. Yes. Cursor took that base model and
• 10:59
  fine -tuned it. Which fine -tuning is such a
• 11:01
  brilliant mechanism. It's like taking someone
• 11:04
  who already knows how to cook and sending them
• 11:06
  to a highly specialized pastry school. I like
• 11:09
  that analogy. Right. The Moonshot model already
• 11:12
  understood language and logic. So Cursor just
• 11:15
  fed it highly specific specialized coding data
• 11:18
  adjusting the model's parameters so it became
• 11:20
  a world -class expert in writing complex software.
• 11:24
  And that pivot... allowed them to release a competitive
• 11:26
  product in mere months. It proved Cursor's resilience
• 11:31
  and ultimately made them an acquisition target
• 11:34
  for SpaceX, because Trull realized he needed
• 11:37
  his own massive compute power. to guarantee he
• 11:40
  would never be at the mercy of a supplier again.
• 11:42
  But achieving that level of rapid innovation
• 11:44
  required a workplace culture that is highly controversial.
• 11:48
  Very controversial. If you want a job at Cursor,
• 11:50
  the sources outline an incredibly grueling hiring
• 11:53
  process. Candidates are required to complete
• 11:55
  a work trial. And we are not talking about a
• 11:57
  standard interview here. No, not at all. We are
• 11:59
  talking about month -long, entirely unpaid trials
• 12:02
  where candidates come into the San Francisco
• 12:03
  office, sit at a desk, eat lunch with the team,
• 12:06
  and work on a frozen version of the code base.
• 12:08
  for 30 days. A whole month. Unpaid. Yes. The
• 12:12
  standard for hiring is astronomically high. One
• 12:16
  management level candidate, detailed in the sources,
• 12:19
  completed the entire month -long process, met
• 12:21
  everyone, delivered the work, and at the end
• 12:23
  of the 30 days, cursor simply told them, we could
• 12:27
  probably do better and declined to hire them.
• 12:29
  Wow. I have to throw a major red flag on this
• 12:31
  practice. I understand the pursuit of excellence
• 12:34
  is the defining brand of Silicon Valley, but
• 12:37
  unpaid, month -long work trials cross a severe
• 12:41
  ethical line. It's definitely intense. You are
• 12:43
  asking professionals to surrender a month of
• 12:46
  their lives, potentially leaving actual paying
• 12:48
  jobs for free labor on a gamble. It makes me
• 12:51
  ask you listening. Does producing generational
• 12:54
  innovation really require this intense grinding
• 12:57
  culture, or is it just exploitation masquerading
• 13:00
  as dedication? Well, the counter argument from
• 13:02
  Kerser's leadership is that a 30 -day trial is
• 13:04
  the only authentic way to measure a candidate's
• 13:06
  raw technical skill and cultural fit under sustained
• 13:09
  pressure. Okay, I hear that. They argue you cannot
• 13:11
  fake a month of complex engineering, but the
• 13:14
  flaw in that logic is the massive selection bias
• 13:17
  it creates. It heavily skews the hiring pool
• 13:20
  toward individuals who have the financial safety
• 13:22
  net to work for free for a month. It actively
• 13:26
  locks out brilliant talent who simply cannot
• 13:28
  afford to take that financial risk. Exactly.
• 13:31
  It creates this insular monoculture of people
• 13:33
  who already possess significant resources. And,
• 13:36
  you know, that intense, often unseen human cost
• 13:40
  directly mirrors the physical cost of this technology.
• 13:43
  Oh, 100%. We talk about vibe coding and cloud
• 13:46
  computing as if these tools exist in this invisible
• 13:49
  frictionless realm. But powering a supercomputer
• 13:53
  with a million H100 ships requires a staggering
• 13:56
  amount of physical energy. You cannot run colossus
• 13:59
  on good vibes alone. No, you really can't. The
• 14:01
  thermodynamics of artificial intelligence are
• 14:04
  brutal. Break that down. Well, a central processing
• 14:06
  unit or CPU in your laptop handles tasks sequentially.
• 14:10
  But the H100 GPUs used for AI operate on parallel
• 14:14
  processing. Meaning they do a bunch of things
• 14:16
  at once? Exactly. They perform thousands of complex
• 14:19
  mathematical equations simultaneously. This pulls
• 14:22
  a massive amount of electrical voltage, which
• 14:25
  in turn generates an enormous amount of heat.
• 14:28
  You then need even more electricity to power
• 14:30
  industrial liquid cooling systems so the hardware
• 14:33
  doesn't physically melt. that is it's hard to
• 14:35
  wrap your head around but that physical reality
• 14:37
  brings us to a major lawsuit unfolding right
• 14:40
  now in South Haven Mississippi which is just
• 14:41
  outside of Memphis right the NAACP is suing XAI
• 14:46
  over the Colossus II data center, and the lawsuit
• 14:50
  centers squarely on public health and environmental
• 14:52
  regulations. According to the filings, XAI is
• 14:55
  operating unpermitted methane gas turbines to
• 14:58
  meet the massive energy demands of this facility.
• 15:01
  The sources showed the number of unpermitted
• 15:02
  turbines operating at the site recently jumped
• 15:04
  from 27 to 57. And the environmental data provided
• 15:07
  in the lawsuit highlights a severe impact from
• 15:10
  that jump. Since April, this expansion of gas
• 15:13
  turbines resulted in an 111 % increase in nitrogen
• 15:16
  oxide emissions. Wow. An 83 % increase in fine
• 15:19
  particulate matter and an 88 % increase in formaldehyde
• 15:22
  emissions. That is incredibly concerning. And
• 15:25
  the location of this data center is a critical
• 15:27
  factor in the lawsuit. It sits adjacent to a
• 15:30
  predominantly black community in the Memphis
• 15:32
  area, a community that already suffers from heavily
• 15:36
  disproportionate pollution burdens. In fact,
• 15:39
  Memphis ranks second in the United States for
• 15:42
  asthma -related emergency room visits. So the
• 15:45
  NAACP asserts that these unpermitted turbines
• 15:48
  are a direct physical threat to public health,
• 15:51
  actively increasing the risks of asthma attacks
• 15:53
  and heart disease for the surrounding residents.
• 15:56
  And based on traditional environmental law, this
• 15:58
  would be a pretty straightforward regulatory
• 16:01
  dispute over the Clean Air Act. You would think
• 16:03
  so. But the federal government just altered the
• 16:05
  entire landscape of this case. Wait, the federal
• 16:07
  government stepped in? Yes. The United States
• 16:10
  Department of Justice, joined by the state of
• 16:12
  Mississippi, intervened in the lawsuit. They
• 16:15
  are formally asking the court to dismiss the
• 16:17
  NAACP's case against XAI. The federal government
• 16:21
  stepping in to defend a private tech company's
• 16:23
  unpermitted gas turbines is unprecedented. What
• 16:26
  is their legal justification for overriding local
• 16:29
  environmental concerns? The Department of Justice
• 16:32
  is basing its argument entirely on national security.
• 16:35
  National security. From a coding AI? Yes. The
• 16:38
  DOJ's memorandum states that there are only four
• 16:41
  artificial intelligence models in existence that
• 16:44
  support mission -critical operations across secret
• 16:47
  and top -secret classified military networks.
• 16:51
  XAI's GROK is one of those four models. Okay,
• 16:54
  the court filings get incredibly specific about
• 16:57
  the military application here, actually. The
• 16:59
  Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer
• 17:01
  at the Department of Defense filed a declaration
• 17:04
  stating the military relies heavily on Grok's
• 17:06
  government model for vital national security
• 17:09
  missions. They explicitly noted that the model
• 17:11
  was actively utilized in recent military strikes
• 17:14
  during the Iran War. So the logic that DOJ is
• 17:17
  presenting to the court is that forcing XAI to
• 17:20
  shut down those gas turbines to comply with local
• 17:22
  environmental permits doesn't just disrupt a
• 17:25
  tech company's commercial operations. Right.
• 17:27
  They argue it directly threatens American national
• 17:30
  economic and energy security by literally cutting
• 17:33
  the power supply to the Department of War's active
• 17:35
  military operation. It is an incredibly stark
• 17:38
  collision of two valid documented realities.
• 17:42
  On one hand, you have the NAACP presenting clear
• 17:46
  verifiable data on emissions and the immediate
• 17:49
  physical harm to public health in a vulnerable
• 17:51
  community. Exactly. On the other hand, the Department
• 17:54
  of Defense and the DOJ are asserting that shut
• 17:56
  shutting down those servers compromises active
• 17:59
  military capabilities. So the local community
• 18:02
  is fighting for fundamental clean air protections,
• 18:05
  and the federal government is arguing that in
• 18:06
  an era of AI warfare, keeping a private data
• 18:09
  center online supersedes local zoning laws and
• 18:13
  environmental permits. We're keeping a strictly
• 18:15
  impartial lens here, but you've got these two
• 18:18
  very real forces colliding. And the outcome of
• 18:20
  this standoff will set a monumental precedent
• 18:22
  for the entire country. AI's hunger for electricity
• 18:25
  is only accelerating. The tech industry's massive
• 18:28
  energy demands will continue to collide with
• 18:30
  local power grids and community health standards.
• 18:33
  The legal classification of a private data center
• 18:35
  as a vital military asset completely rewrites
• 18:39
  the rules of corporate accountability and civic
• 18:41
  engagement. It completely strips away the illusion
• 18:44
  that AI is just a neat tool for writing better
• 18:47
  emails or, you know, generating code. It is deeply
• 18:49
  physical, requiring land, water, and immense
• 18:52
  electricity, and it is now shielded by the Pentagon.
• 18:55
  This whole new world. It really is. Well, before
• 18:58
  we wrap up, a quick thanks to Old Glory, an iconic
• 19:01
  music and sports fan merch store. Perfect for
• 19:03
  the techie in your life. Use promo code SNARFL
• 19:06
  for 15 % off at oldglory .com. You know, looking
• 19:10
  back, Today's stories map out the full life cycle
• 19:14
  of this new technological era perfectly. They
• 19:16
  really do. We started with the financial and
• 19:19
  structural layer, a $60 billion mega merger designed
• 19:22
  to control the foundational tools that developers
• 19:24
  use to write software. Then we examined the human
• 19:27
  layer, the intense grueling culture, and the
• 19:29
  desperate technical pivots required to build
• 19:32
  that software in the shadow of massive competitors
• 19:34
  like Anthropic. And finally, we confronted the
• 19:36
  physical layer. The theoretical race for the
• 19:39
  best coding AI directly translates into unpermitted
• 19:42
  gas turbines in a local neighborhood, turbines
• 19:44
  that the Department of Defense is now defending
• 19:46
  in federal court. Because the $60 billion valuation
• 19:50
  is fueled by the 1 million H100 chips, the chips
• 19:54
  require the massive power of the gas turbines,
• 19:57
  and the turbines remain online because the AI
• 19:59
  they power is embedded in active military operations.
• 20:03
  Exactly. Which leaves us with a critical question
• 20:05
  to consider as we watch these tech empires expand.
• 20:08
  What happens when private tech infrastructure
• 20:11
  like coding tools and local server farms become
• 20:13
  so deeply entangled with the military industrial
• 20:16
  complex that we can no longer distinguish between
• 20:18
  a consumer application and a weapon of national
• 20:21
  security. This is a profound blurring of lines
• 20:23
  that will define the next decade. We're here
• 20:25
  to help at SNARFL, so reach out on our website
• 20:27
  if you have any more questions. That's a wrap
• 20:33
  on today's top stories. Remember, tech doesn't
• 20:36
  have to be complicated, and we're here to help
• 20:38
  connect the dots. If you've got questions or
• 20:41
  want to learn more, visit us at snarfl .com.
• 20:44
  Thanks for listening and we'll catch you next
• 20:46
  time.