Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / RECAP: JOE AND HUNTER BIDEN CRIME FAMILY. A Deep Dive Into This EXPOSE'!

Transcript

RECAP: JOE AND HUNTER BIDEN CRIME FAMILY. A Deep Dive Into This EXPOSE'! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: Where are we with Hunter Biden? What got us here?
0:04
Speaker 1: And I'm talking about personally. We know that Hunter Biden
0:07
Speaker 1: was doing business with Russian oligarchs. We know that from
0:10
Speaker 1: his laptop, we know that from his emails. We know
0:14
Speaker 1: that some of the people he's involved when the Russia
0:15
Speaker 1: have gotten in serious trouble internationally with crimes that they
0:21
Speaker 1: have committed and with investigations into them. We know that
0:26
Speaker 1: there's direct lines to vidermer Putting. We know that there
0:30
Speaker 1: is blackmail that Russia has on Hunter Biden. But then
0:35
Speaker 1: there was another aspect of this, and we really need
0:39
Speaker 1: to understand the quid pro quo that was happening. And
0:44
Speaker 1: they're going much bigger this time than just Hunter Biden
0:48
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden. They're getting their tentacles into people like
0:52
Speaker 1: John Bayner and Nancy Pelosi to people that held the
0:55
Speaker 1: same job want a Republican and won a Democrat. And
0:58
Speaker 1: I'm going to go through this, but I want to
1:00
Speaker 1: start with the calls for a special counsel to be
1:04
Speaker 1: appointed in why people are now saying this. US Senator
1:08
Speaker 1: Marsha Blackburn is now calling for a special counsel to
1:13
Speaker 1: be convened to look into the connections between Hunter Biden
1:18
Speaker 1: Joe Biden. Hunters are Joe Biden's brother and the Biden
1:22
Speaker 1: crime family, as I call them. Now you have two
1:25
Speaker 1: more high profile House Republicans are joining a push for
1:28
Speaker 1: the Attorney General Merritt Garland to appoint a Justice Department
1:32
Speaker 1: special counsel to investigate President Joe Biden's entire family with
1:37
Speaker 1: their business ties to the Chinese Communist Party. House GEOP
1:41
Speaker 1: Conference Chairman Stephanic and Representative Madison Cawthorne both confirmed this
1:49
Speaker 1: week that they support the growing calls for a special
1:53
Speaker 1: council appointment. Now a quick reminder, if you're listening to
1:56
Speaker 1: this podcast, please make sure you hit the subscriber auto
2:00
Speaker 1: download button and tell your friends about this podcast, share
2:03
Speaker 1: this on social media, and if you would write us
2:05
Speaker 1: a five star review to help us, as Democrats have
2:08
Speaker 1: been attacking our podcast recently with bad reviews. Now. Their
2:11
Speaker 1: statement comes after the New York Post Editorial Board announced
2:16
Speaker 1: their support for a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden
2:20
Speaker 1: and the Biden's family's Chinese business dealings, this after Blackburn
2:25
Speaker 1: did so earlier in the week. Now, I'm going to
2:28
Speaker 1: read for you part of the New York Posts and
2:31
Speaker 1: what they had to say their opinion editorial posted by
2:35
Speaker 1: the editorial Boards at a point of special counsel on
2:38
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Now, why, well, here's the background. In two
2:43
Speaker 1: and eighteen, the US Attorney in Delaware began quietly investigating
2:48
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's financial activities. The probe was slowed in twenty
2:53
Speaker 1: twenty on purpose, we now know as the presidential election approached.
2:58
Speaker 1: Now it's February of twenty twenty two. How much longer
3:03
Speaker 1: could the FEDS take when they started this thing basically
3:06
Speaker 1: four years ago. At this point, you have to wonder
3:11
Speaker 1: if any investigation would still be under way were it
3:14
Speaker 1: not for the laptop Hunter abandoned in twenty nineteen, and
3:19
Speaker 1: that The Post reported on what was on that laptop
3:22
Speaker 1: and social media and big tech silenced it days before
3:25
Speaker 1: the election between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. That, after all,
3:30
Speaker 1: dragged evidence of hunters dubious doings in two light, despite
3:35
Speaker 1: the best efforts of the media and big tech to
3:38
Speaker 1: suppress all of that reporting by the Post. The business
3:42
Speaker 1: dealings plainly greased by his father's connections, his international connections,
3:48
Speaker 1: and domestic political might. It was very clear that Joe
3:53
Speaker 1: Biden was telling his son, Hunter Biden and his brother,
3:56
Speaker 1: go make the family a lot of money and use
3:58
Speaker 1: me to do it. Were doing this the entire time
4:01
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden was a vice president for eight years.
4:04
Speaker 1: In fact, his brother had been doing it for decades
4:07
Speaker 1: when he was in the Senate. But when Hunter Biden
4:11
Speaker 1: got to be of age and Hunter Biden couldn't keep
4:13
Speaker 1: a job of his own, he decided to start trading
4:16
Speaker 1: off his father's name, and his father was a part
4:19
Speaker 1: of it. And in fact, I would argue that it's
4:21
Speaker 1: very clear now that Hunter Biden's business dealings would never
4:24
Speaker 1: have come to fruition if it wasn't for his father's
4:27
Speaker 1: not just support, but involvement in all of his business dealings,
4:30
Speaker 1: which he lied about during the campaign. Clang he knew
4:33
Speaker 1: nothing about his son's business dealings, and then pictures start
4:36
Speaker 1: to surface of him playing golf with all the people
4:38
Speaker 1: that Hunter Biden does business with. We know from that
4:41
Speaker 1: famous audio recording that Hunter Biden was on the board
4:46
Speaker 1: of Barisma in Ukraine. We also know now that there's
4:50
Speaker 1: a good reason, there, maybe a very good reason why
4:52
Speaker 1: Joe Biden has taking his hand off Ukraine because Ukraine
4:54
Speaker 1: screwed his family's business and the empire that he had built,
4:58
Speaker 1: where his son and his other traded political favors to
5:02
Speaker 1: get in connection with now the president of the United
5:05
Speaker 1: States of America. I go back to the point I'm
5:08
Speaker 1: in a moment ago. You got to wonder if any
5:10
Speaker 1: investigation would still be underway if it were not for
5:13
Speaker 1: the laptop hunter abandoned. Now we had all the business
5:18
Speaker 1: dealings plainly put out there in his own words and
5:21
Speaker 1: his own emails. It was very clear this father was
5:24
Speaker 1: forced to grease the wheels to get any of these
5:26
Speaker 1: business deals done, which he lied abound. And we also
5:31
Speaker 1: know that there was money going to the big guy,
5:33
Speaker 1: which was very clearly Joe Biden. Now it's tricky for
5:38
Speaker 1: any Justice department to investigate the president and his family,
5:42
Speaker 1: and this is one has already shown clear signs of politicalization.
5:46
Speaker 1: This Justice Department, the Attorney General Merritt Garland himself playing
5:51
Speaker 1: along with a White House eager to put the fear
5:55
Speaker 1: of the f behind parents who want to speak their
5:56
Speaker 1: minds at local school board meeting, shows you just how
5:59
Speaker 1: political the has become. It's pastime. The post says for
6:04
Speaker 1: Garland to explain why he hasn't named a special counsel.
6:07
Speaker 1: The amount of money going to the family, the Biden
6:10
Speaker 1: crime family, well over thirty million dollars directly coming from China.
6:14
Speaker 1: All of this has come out, This idea has been
6:18
Speaker 1: battled around at least since Hunter Biden's art cell's surface
6:22
Speaker 1: as well. Now let's hit pause and talk about those
6:25
Speaker 1: art selling finger paintings for a moment. A. G. Garland
6:30
Speaker 1: has been asked to appoint a special counsel to investigate
6:34
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Part of it's because of the art that
6:38
Speaker 1: has been sold. What is it worth? The Attorney General
6:41
Speaker 1: was pressed recently to appoint a special counsel to investigate
6:45
Speaker 1: the art cells alone of Hunter Biden's and the President's son.
6:50
Speaker 1: Where some of that art is even in the White House.
6:52
Speaker 1: Right now, his novice works have been sold, We've been
6:58
Speaker 1: told of upwards of a half a million dollars. Representative
7:01
Speaker 1: Ken Back, a Republican from Colorado, began his line of
7:04
Speaker 1: questioning in a House Judiciary Committee hearing by showing two
7:07
Speaker 1: pieces of artwork from Claude Money and Edgar Degas listed
7:14
Speaker 1: and sold at Christie's for seven hundred thousand and a
7:17
Speaker 1: half million, respectively. Now you know the name Mona, you
7:19
Speaker 1: know the name togs As. These are some of the
7:23
Speaker 1: most famous names in art, and their artwork sold at
7:27
Speaker 1: Christie's for seven hundred thousand and five hundred thousand, respectively.
7:31
Speaker 1: Immediately after, he showed a third painting. You may recognize
7:35
Speaker 1: his painting as a Hunter Biden. The Hunter Biden painting
7:38
Speaker 1: sold for five hundred thousand bucks, said, noting that the
7:41
Speaker 1: President Sun lacks an artistic background and was unable to
7:44
Speaker 1: find a gallery to listen his artwork in before his
7:47
Speaker 1: dad became president in twenty twenty. He went on to say,
7:51
Speaker 1: and what happened in twenty twenty that changed all that
7:55
Speaker 1: is that his name became valuable because his dad became
7:58
Speaker 1: the President of the United States of America. Now a
8:01
Speaker 1: single piece of art from Hunter Biden sells for more
8:03
Speaker 1: than the average American home. To put it in perspective,
8:09
Speaker 1: how is it that two of the most famous artists
8:11
Speaker 1: of all time, Monet and Degas have paintings selling for
8:14
Speaker 1: the same exact amount as Hunter Biden. If it wasn't
8:18
Speaker 1: for his father being in the White House, this wouldn't
8:20
Speaker 1: be happening. But proceed to ask Garland if he would
8:23
Speaker 1: appoint a special counsel to investigate Hunter Biden just on
8:26
Speaker 1: the issue of the art, noting his office in a
8:30
Speaker 1: letter of the Department of Justice Justice making the same request.
8:33
Speaker 1: Quote for the same reason, I'm not to respond to
8:36
Speaker 1: questions about investigations of the former president or anyone else.
8:39
Speaker 1: I'm not going to discuss or otherwise with respect to
8:43
Speaker 1: any uss and Garland's answer, so he decided to invoke
8:47
Speaker 1: Trump there and investigations in the Trump is the reason
8:50
Speaker 1: why he wouldn't comment. Kirison. Buck pushed back again, saying
8:55
Speaker 1: you are allowed to tell us whether you will appoint
8:58
Speaker 1: a special counsel. Garland responded by saying he was unaware
9:03
Speaker 1: that Buck's office had sent the letter. Now, as Buck's
9:06
Speaker 1: time expired, Representive Eric Squalwell mocked as colleague's line of questions, saying,
9:10
Speaker 1: General Garland, you may not get these four hours back,
9:14
Speaker 1: but you may get some art history credit for today.
9:18
Speaker 1: That is how Eric Swalwell, the guy was sleeping literally
9:21
Speaker 1: with the enemy Chinese spies, decided to respond, you know
9:26
Speaker 1: where his allegiance clearly lay no pun intended. Now, Buck's
9:31
Speaker 1: letter outlined a dj criminal tax investigation into Hunter Biden
9:36
Speaker 1: that was launched last year, which is another reason why
9:41
Speaker 1: the amount of smoke coming out of the House of Biden,
9:46
Speaker 1: the family to Biden, has not It's no longer smoke.
9:49
Speaker 1: It's a full blown fire. I would argue a five
9:53
Speaker 1: alarm fire, which exactly why we're going to do a
9:57
Speaker 1: five part series on this family, because there's two much
10:00
Speaker 1: information to get into just one or two conversations. Now,
10:05
Speaker 1: Buck's letter not only outlined the DJ's criminal tax investigation
10:08
Speaker 1: to Hunter Biden that was launched last year, but he
10:10
Speaker 1: also noted the possible involvement of the President of the
10:13
Speaker 1: United States of America as well. Now Congresson Buck also
10:17
Speaker 1: said it's now apparent that President Biden could be directly
10:22
Speaker 1: implicated in the ongoing investigations into his son's money transfers
10:27
Speaker 1: and dealings, raising serious questions regarding whether then Vice President
10:32
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was aware of and possibly benefited from the
10:37
Speaker 1: influence peddling operation led by his son. Based on Hunter
10:42
Speaker 1: Biden's own words, it's very clear that that is a reality. Quote,
10:47
Speaker 1: it's now more critical than ever to appoint a special
10:50
Speaker 1: counsel who can lead the investigation in an impartial way.
10:54
Speaker 1: As outlined in twenty eight c f R six hundred.
10:59
Speaker 1: The Attorney General has the right to appoint a special
11:01
Speaker 1: counsel to investigate and prosecute matters and individuals that present
11:05
Speaker 1: a conflict of interest for the Department when it is
11:09
Speaker 1: in the public's interest. Allowing the investigation to continue to
11:12
Speaker 1: be handled according to the normal practices of the Department
11:16
Speaker 1: means that Senate confirm political appointees who can only be
11:21
Speaker 1: removed from office by the President are now overseeing an
11:24
Speaker 1: investigation into his sons and possibly his financial dealings related
11:30
Speaker 1: to a prior or possible ongoing influence peddling scheme. Now
11:35
Speaker 1: let me just pause right there, and I got to
11:37
Speaker 1: go back. We already know for a fact that the
11:39
Speaker 1: Department of Justice has a criminal tax investigation on Hunter Biden.
11:43
Speaker 1: It was launched last year. That is a fact. It's
11:46
Speaker 1: an undisputed fact. It is. You can't say it's not true.
11:50
Speaker 1: You can't say it's not happening. That's number one. Okay,
11:55
Speaker 1: And again, everybody it's listening to this right now. You
11:58
Speaker 1: need to be writing this down. You need to be
11:59
Speaker 1: shared our five part series of our podcast with everybody
12:04
Speaker 1: you know, because this is the stuff that people don't
12:07
Speaker 1: know in this country that they need to know. Number Two,
12:10
Speaker 1: you have Hunter Biden selling artwork for the same price
12:14
Speaker 1: as Monet and degaz are going for it Christie's, which
12:18
Speaker 1: is a huge problem. And we also know that there's
12:21
Speaker 1: been an open investigation into Hunter Biden since two thousand
12:26
Speaker 1: and eighteen. No person is above the law, not even
12:30
Speaker 1: the President of the United States of America in theory.
12:33
Speaker 1: We clearly know that's not true in this scenario. The
12:36
Speaker 1: Attorney General was also later pressed on the issue by
12:39
Speaker 1: Representative Tom McClintock from California, who noted that other communications
12:45
Speaker 1: from Hunter Biden have indicated as finances were intertwined with
12:49
Speaker 1: the presidents. He said, quote, if that doesn't call for
12:53
Speaker 1: an independent investigation to the president, what would. I'm not
12:56
Speaker 1: going to comment quote unquote about the investigation, but because
12:59
Speaker 1: everyone knows there is an investigation going on in Delaware
13:03
Speaker 1: by the US Attorney who was appointed by the previous administration,
13:06
Speaker 1: and I can't comment on any further information than that.
13:12
Speaker 1: As recently as last month, Hunter Biden has been criticized
13:15
Speaker 1: for the price of his artwork and lack of transparency
13:18
Speaker 1: regarding the buying process. In fact, at least five prints
13:23
Speaker 1: of his artwork have already been sold for seventy five
13:25
Speaker 1: thousand each. That is a print, meaning a duplicate, not
13:28
Speaker 1: even the original piece of art. It's a duplicate and
13:31
Speaker 1: a team of lawyers as vetting potential patrons who planned
13:35
Speaker 1: to attend his upcoming gallery show in New York City
13:39
Speaker 1: in the spring. The George Burgess Gallery sold The Prince
13:43
Speaker 1: before the October one opening of a pop up presentation
13:47
Speaker 1: in Los Angeles. According to report earlier this month, it's
13:51
Speaker 1: also unclear who purchased the reproductions, which cost a fraction
13:55
Speaker 1: of the top price of a half million for an
13:58
Speaker 1: original piece by Hunter Biden, or if any more were
14:01
Speaker 1: sold after the LA show opened. The director of the
14:05
Speaker 1: US Office of Government Ethics under present Barack Obama has
14:10
Speaker 1: even come out now and called for the cell of
14:13
Speaker 1: the artwork to flat out be canceled or for the
14:17
Speaker 1: names of the buyers to be disclosed to prevent secretive
14:21
Speaker 1: influence buying. Now, the response from the White House has
14:26
Speaker 1: actually been exactly what you would expect from a senile,
14:30
Speaker 1: angry Joe Biden. Earlier this month, the present was finally
14:35
Speaker 1: asked by a New York Post reporter if he was
14:39
Speaker 1: concerned about the potential corruption involving his son's artwork and
14:44
Speaker 1: the cell of it for the same amount of money
14:46
Speaker 1: as Monai's, and his answer was exactly what you would
14:50
Speaker 1: expect from an angry Joe Biden quote. You've got to
14:54
Speaker 1: be kidding me. We also know that Joe Biden is
15:00
Speaker 1: helping his son's artwork by putting it in the White House. Now,
15:04
Speaker 1: I want to go back to another part of this
15:06
Speaker 1: story just for a moment, because I think this is
15:08
Speaker 1: so important to understand how big of a deal this
15:11
Speaker 1: is and how nonpartisan this should actually be. X obama
15:15
Speaker 1: Ethics chief is now knocking the White House and the
15:19
Speaker 1: White House Press Secretary for dismissing the Hunter Biden questions.
15:24
Speaker 1: This is not a conservative, it's the former head of
15:27
Speaker 1: the federal government's ethics office under Barack Obama. Rebuke the
15:32
Speaker 1: White House Press Secretary a day after she brushed off
15:35
Speaker 1: The Post questions about whether the identity of the buyers
15:38
Speaker 1: for Hunter Biden's artwork would remain anonymous. Now, the Post
15:42
Speaker 1: has done an amazing job ever since they were attacked
15:45
Speaker 1: for the laptop story, and that story was silenced by
15:48
Speaker 1: big tech Twitter and Facebook and all the others, and
15:51
Speaker 1: the news media refused to report on it because they
15:54
Speaker 1: knew it would cost Joe Biden the presidency. The Post
15:59
Speaker 1: reported last week at five of the first Son's prints,
16:03
Speaker 1: again not original artwork, Prince of the artwork, sold for
16:06
Speaker 1: seventy five thousand apiece, and that prospective buyers attending an
16:11
Speaker 1: upcoming York show, we're being vetted by teams of lawyers.
16:15
Speaker 1: I know this is your favorite topic, but again it
16:19
Speaker 1: still is the purview of the Galris Jinsaki said during
16:24
Speaker 1: her briefing. We still do not know and will not
16:27
Speaker 1: know who purchases any paintings. And the present remains proud
16:31
Speaker 1: of his son. I bet she does his son's making
16:33
Speaker 1: a crap down of money as much as mmmay putting
16:35
Speaker 1: up finger paintings. The Press secretary then cut off further
16:38
Speaker 1: inquiries about the matter by asking, did you have another
16:42
Speaker 1: question on something else? Otherwise We're going to move on
16:45
Speaker 1: to some other topics, lots going on in the world,
16:47
Speaker 1: as she mocked the media for asking such a ridiculous question.
16:51
Speaker 1: That response through the year of Walter Schwab, who directed
16:56
Speaker 1: the US Office of Government Ethics during the Obama's second term,
17:00
Speaker 1: Rman left that post in the summer of twenty seventeen.
17:03
Speaker 1: These are legitimate questions. He began a lengthy Twitter thread.
17:08
Speaker 1: It's disappointing to hear Saki send a message at the
17:10
Speaker 1: White House thinks the public has no right to ask
17:13
Speaker 1: about ethics after the last four years, referring to Donald Trump,
17:17
Speaker 1: these questions have never been more important. I know this
17:20
Speaker 1: isn't a popular opinion, but this stuff matters. These are
17:24
Speaker 1: legitimate questions. It's disappointing that they would continue to do this.
17:28
Speaker 1: A Swab and other ethics and government experts have repeatedly
17:32
Speaker 1: warned that the seal of Hunter Biden's art was likely
17:34
Speaker 1: to draw the interests a perspective foreign buyers seeking to
17:39
Speaker 1: curry favor with his father's administration. The questions grew louder
17:43
Speaker 1: after Los Angeles Mayor, Biden's nominee to be ambassador to India,
17:47
Speaker 1: attended his first Sons Hollywood showing earlier this month than
17:51
Speaker 1: People are wondering if that mayor actually bought Biden's artwork,
17:55
Speaker 1: which would guarantee him the ambassadorship to India. Quote. There's
17:59
Speaker 1: no FIS program in the world that can be built
18:02
Speaker 1: around the head of States staff working with a dealer
18:05
Speaker 1: to keep the public and the dark about the identities
18:08
Speaker 1: of individuals who are paying vast sums to the leader's
18:12
Speaker 1: family members for subjectively priced items of no base value.
18:21
Speaker 1: If there were Trump doing this, Pjing Vladimir Putin, you'd
18:27
Speaker 1: have no doubt whatsoever that this creates a vehicle for
18:31
Speaker 1: funneling cash to the first family in exchange for access
18:34
Speaker 1: or favors. Nor would you doubt that the appearance of
18:38
Speaker 1: monetizing the presidency was outrageous. If it were Trump, Ze
18:42
Speaker 1: or Putin, this would be a different story. He's absolutely right.
18:48
Speaker 1: Source told The Post last week that George's Burgess's Gallery
18:53
Speaker 1: has implemented the screening process ahead of Hunter Biden's show,
18:58
Speaker 1: which has been delayed till a little bit later this year.
19:03
Speaker 1: It was unclear who hired the legal team performing the
19:06
Speaker 1: quote vetting shop of frequent critic of former President Donald
19:10
Speaker 1: Trump tweeted that while the forty fifth president's ethical transgressions
19:14
Speaker 1: were worse, the distraction the excuse me, the distinction doesn't matter.
19:19
Speaker 1: So this is an anti Trump guy who thinks Donald
19:22
Speaker 1: Trump's the worst person in the world is still saying this.
19:25
Speaker 1: Now you got to ask a question about the Los
19:27
Speaker 1: Angeles mayor as well attending Hunter Biden's first art show
19:30
Speaker 1: in Hollywood, a guy that's trying to become an ambassador
19:33
Speaker 1: to India. Quote, it's all the worst because Biden ran
19:37
Speaker 1: as the anecdote to Trump. So the message is that
19:40
Speaker 1: this is not just that we're not just better than Trump,
19:43
Speaker 1: which is far too low a standard, but that this
19:46
Speaker 1: is the opposite of Trump, which is even worse. President
19:50
Speaker 1: Biden himself was asked as he left the White House
19:52
Speaker 1: on Friday if he was concerned about potential corruption involving
19:55
Speaker 1: his son's art sales. Come on, man, that's the response
19:59
Speaker 1: you get from the President. Eric Trump had a very
20:03
Speaker 1: interesting conversation. He has a very interesting perspective because Eric
20:07
Speaker 1: Trump is public enemy number one because his dad is
20:11
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And he sat down and had a conversation
20:14
Speaker 1: with a good friend of mine, Dan Bongino, and part
20:17
Speaker 1: of their conversation was about not just the double standard here,
20:22
Speaker 1: but how insane this story actually is. And I want
20:26
Speaker 1: you to hear part of what Eric Trump had to
20:28
Speaker 1: say about these paintings and him saying, imagine if I
20:31
Speaker 1: would have done this, what would have happened? To me
20:34
Speaker 1: question for you. Your family has been the subject of ridiculous,
20:37
Speaker 1: endless which hunts here and this is kind of strange.
20:40
Speaker 1: His confidential emails now emerged from the Obama State Department
20:43
Speaker 1: showing that insiders in the Ukrainian Embassy had some real
20:47
Speaker 1: suspicions about what Hunter Biden was up to. And we'll
20:50
Speaker 1: see here as they said, the real issue, to my mind,
20:52
Speaker 1: this is from the Deputy Chief Emission, George Ken, was
20:54
Speaker 1: that someone in Washington needed to engage VP Biden quietly
20:58
Speaker 1: and say that his son Hunter's presence on the Barisma
21:00
Speaker 1: board undercut the anti corruption message the VP and we
21:04
Speaker 1: were advancing in Ukraine. You know what's really strange, Eric,
21:07
Speaker 1: during the impeachment hoax against your dad, they the defense
21:11
Speaker 1: team never got a hold of this email about Hunter
21:13
Speaker 1: Biden was up there. Maybe they were too busy investigating
21:15
Speaker 1: you guys for a golf course or something, or a
21:18
Speaker 1: real estate operation you guys were in. I mean, this
21:21
Speaker 1: has to really kind of piss you off. This to
21:22
Speaker 1: be candid about it. Yeah, yeah, conveniently they missed it.
21:26
Speaker 1: And you know why because the big guy, if you
21:27
Speaker 1: remember the other emails, right, the big guy was getting
21:30
Speaker 1: ten percent. We're gonna save ten percent for the big guy.
21:32
Speaker 1: And that's right. They will investigate us. If we have
21:34
Speaker 1: a comm out of place, they'll go after us. You know, Dan,
21:37
Speaker 1: you know me pretty well as a guy. I'm a
21:38
Speaker 1: straight guy, no drugs, no nonsense. I'm the first to
21:41
Speaker 1: one up, you know, in the morning. I worked very,
21:43
Speaker 1: very hard. Could you imagine the world that, you know,
21:45
Speaker 1: when my father was commander in chief? Forget about a
21:47
Speaker 1: hunter whose father was vice president, but could you imagine
21:50
Speaker 1: in a world where you know, where Donald Trump was
21:53
Speaker 1: commander in chief and I was doing crystal meth and
21:56
Speaker 1: heroin and you know, dating my deceased brother's wife and
21:59
Speaker 1: all the other things that were happening. I mean, Dan,
22:01
Speaker 1: I'd be dead. I'd be dead. And by the way,
22:03
Speaker 1: they don't they don't even try and stop it. I mean,
22:05
Speaker 1: right now, with Joe Biden as president, the guy is
22:08
Speaker 1: still out their finger painting. He's selling those for hundreds
22:10
Speaker 1: of thousands of dollars. Could you imagine if I was
22:12
Speaker 1: selling my artwork as an unqualified artist two people in
22:17
Speaker 1: you know, New York on you know, unknown people, I'd
22:20
Speaker 1: be honest. Yeah, I can't imagine that. Eric because I
22:26
Speaker 1: enjoy have to hang out with you in prison, because
22:29
Speaker 1: what did I tell you? And at the dinner yea,
22:30
Speaker 1: I said, Eric, you know, maybe you should do a
22:33
Speaker 1: pay thing for charity or something and the media lose
22:35
Speaker 1: their mind if you donate in the money. I think
22:37
Speaker 1: that's a great idea. I mean, this is how crazy
22:40
Speaker 1: these people are. You don't actually you don't hear Eric,
22:42
Speaker 1: you don't hear about this guy. You don't hear about
22:44
Speaker 1: this guy. No, no, you are. I think that one
22:47
Speaker 1: of the interesting points you just made there was how
22:49
Speaker 1: did they miss this email? You heard? Eric Trump mentioned it, like,
22:53
Speaker 1: how do you miss this email? How does this even happen?
22:57
Speaker 1: Did you really miss it? Or was it just done
22:59
Speaker 1: on purpose? Because I have a feeling it's probably an
23:02
Speaker 1: issue of it being on purpose. This was an accident.
23:08
Speaker 1: This was done on purpose. It's very clear it was
23:12
Speaker 1: done on purpose. And now all of a sudden it
23:15
Speaker 1: just happens to show up. And that's now where we
23:19
Speaker 1: are with this. Ari Flasher, former White House Press Secretary
23:24
Speaker 1: for George W. Bush, said this, and he's absolutely right
23:30
Speaker 1: on Fox News Channel about Hunter Biden. It's Press Secretary
23:34
Speaker 1: Jen SAKEI is refusing to say who bought Hunter Biden's
23:38
Speaker 1: recently sold stake in a Chinese firm. This despite critics
23:42
Speaker 1: demanding transparency from the White House, saying the President's son
23:46
Speaker 1: and his business dealings raise huge ethics concerns. Listen to
23:50
Speaker 1: this exchange from yesterday's briefing, shortly after President Biden's virtual
23:54
Speaker 1: meeting with the Chinese President's her son's attorney said that
23:58
Speaker 1: he has finalsted for me Chinese investment fund controlled by
24:03
Speaker 1: State of Identities. I was hoping you could commit to
24:06
Speaker 1: basic transparency about that transaction, including the name of the
24:09
Speaker 1: buyer or the dollar amount in the timing. The President's
24:12
Speaker 1: son is not an employee of the federal government, so
24:14
Speaker 1: I'd point you to his representatives, oh Ari, If this
24:19
Speaker 1: was under a different administration, dare I suggest the answer
24:23
Speaker 1: would have been probably far different, and so too with
24:26
Speaker 1: the media reaction. That is exactly what I was thinking.
24:29
Speaker 1: If this was one of the Trump children, this would
24:31
Speaker 1: be a feeding frenzy in the press because they know
24:33
Speaker 1: it's connected to the president. And in the case of
24:36
Speaker 1: the Trunk children, at least they were actual legitimate business people,
24:41
Speaker 1: unlike Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden has made a career of
24:45
Speaker 1: cashing in on his last name and having relationships with
24:49
Speaker 1: powerful people, often international, who want access to the president,
24:52
Speaker 1: the Vice president, and now the President, or the perception
24:55
Speaker 1: of access that he was selling. This is a problem
24:58
Speaker 1: throughout the administration, and the biggest issue that frustrates me
25:03
Speaker 1: to no end is how most of the White House
25:04
Speaker 1: press courts could care less. They just let it go
25:07
Speaker 1: because it's Joe Biden. And this is part of the
25:09
Speaker 1: whole original problem with the way the press covered the
25:12
Speaker 1: Biden campaign from the start and the way they cover
25:15
Speaker 1: him now as president. They just don't think there could
25:17
Speaker 1: possibly be an ethical lapse, a problem caused by Joe
25:22
Speaker 1: Biden's son. They roll their eyes when they hear the
25:24
Speaker 1: word hunter. Well, it's a legitimate inquiry, then the White
25:27
Speaker 1: House ought to answer it. It's a legitimate inquiry in
25:30
Speaker 1: the White House ought to answer it. Nari Flesher's a
25:33
Speaker 1: guy that I've known for a long time. You noticed
25:36
Speaker 1: in his response theories not a guy to overhype things.
25:39
Speaker 1: But he's making a very clear not just accusation. It's
25:43
Speaker 1: based on the facts. Hunter Biden has made a career
25:45
Speaker 1: of cashing in on his last name, and we know
25:49
Speaker 1: that his last name is directly connected in every business
25:53
Speaker 1: deal to the influence of his father, which is exactly
25:57
Speaker 1: why Jen Psaki is refusing to answer questions about Hunter
26:00
Speaker 1: Biden time and time and time and time and time again.
26:03
Speaker 1: Go ahead, add the Biden administrations. They put out a
26:06
Speaker 1: big report on that addressing corruption. I want to ask
26:09
Speaker 1: you too quick and probably pretty easy questions about that.
26:13
Speaker 1: Shortly after President Biden's virtual meeting with the Chinese president's
26:18
Speaker 1: first son's attorney, he said that he has finally invested
26:22
Speaker 1: from a Chinese investment fund controlled by state owned entities.
26:26
Speaker 1: I was hoping you could commit to basic transparency about
26:29
Speaker 1: that transaction, including the name of the buyer or the
26:31
Speaker 1: dollar amount and the tiding. And the second question is
26:34
Speaker 1: my colleague Brandon Divine has a new book out called
26:37
Speaker 1: The Laptop from Hell, and I was hoping that you
26:40
Speaker 1: could confirm that the laptop is indeed authentic and not
26:45
Speaker 1: rushing disinformation as you seem to suggest on Twitter last year. Well,
26:49
Speaker 1: on the first, the President's son is not an employee
26:52
Speaker 1: of the federal government, so I'd point you to his representatives.
26:55
Speaker 1: And as it relates to the book, I have norther
26:57
Speaker 1: neither had the time nor interest in exploring reading the book.
27:03
Speaker 1: I think I answered your question. Go ahead, you can
27:05
Speaker 1: go to the representative of the person who's not an
27:07
Speaker 1: employee of the federal government. Go ahead, Tina. I think
27:10
Speaker 1: we have to move on. I think we have to
27:12
Speaker 1: move on. I have no interest in reading this book,
27:15
Speaker 1: so therefore I'm not going to read this book now.
27:19
Speaker 1: Let me also remind you a Barack Obama's press secretary
27:23
Speaker 1: ducking questions about Hunter Biden and Barisma. This was back
27:27
Speaker 1: in twenty fourteen. This was in November the fifth of
27:31
Speaker 1: twenty fourteen. And the reason why I'm playing all this
27:33
Speaker 1: for you is because I think it's so important to
27:36
Speaker 1: understand how long people have been whistled blowing on the
27:39
Speaker 1: corruption of the Biden family. We can go all the
27:42
Speaker 1: way back to twenty fourteen, when President Obama is in
27:47
Speaker 1: the White House twenty fourteen, talking to Jake Carney about
27:50
Speaker 1: Joe Biden, about Hunter Biden, about Ukraine. Hunter Biden has
27:54
Speaker 1: not taken a position with the largest oil and gas
27:58
Speaker 1: company and holding company in Ukraine, is already concerned about
28:02
Speaker 1: at least the appearance of a of a conflict there.
28:08
Speaker 1: To the Vice President's office, I saw those reports. Hunter
28:12
Speaker 1: Biden and other members of the Biden family are obviously
28:16
Speaker 1: private citizens, and where they work is not does not
28:23
Speaker 1: reflect an endorsement by the administration or by the Vice
28:27
Speaker 1: president of president. But I would refer to the Vice
28:29
Speaker 1: President's office. That was eight years ago, eight years ago.
28:39
Speaker 1: This crap has been going on for that long eight
28:44
Speaker 1: years ago. That was the White House having a comment
28:48
Speaker 1: on this issue. This guy is getting the same amount
28:52
Speaker 1: of money for artwork while the while he's while his
28:56
Speaker 1: dad is the president. Wow. Let me remind you of
29:02
Speaker 1: November of last year, actually October of last year, when
29:07
Speaker 1: Fox News asked a simple question. New emails show Joe
29:10
Speaker 1: and Hunter Biden shared a bank account. Kind of a
29:12
Speaker 1: big deal, right, big news. You would think that the
29:15
Speaker 1: media would have gone wall to wall. Imagine if Eric
29:18
Speaker 1: Trump was sharing a joint bank account with the vice
29:22
Speaker 1: president of the president at the time. Well, while that's
29:25
Speaker 1: hanging in the air, consider this. White House Press Secretary
29:28
Speaker 1: John Sack dodged more questions about Hunter Biden's recent art sales.
29:34
Speaker 1: That's hope you could see the White House news who
29:36
Speaker 1: purchased the High Princeton. Whether there is indeed a departure
29:39
Speaker 1: to the arrangement that there would be even anonymity here.
29:42
Speaker 1: I know this is your favorite topic, but again it
29:45
Speaker 1: still is the purview of the gallerist. We still do
29:49
Speaker 1: not know and will not know who purchases any paintings,
29:53
Speaker 1: and the president remains proud of his son. I don't know.
29:56
Speaker 1: Is it just me when she says galorist it sounds
29:58
Speaker 1: like a James Bond character. Raymond Arroyo isn't focused now,
30:02
Speaker 1: Fox News contributor. I'm not even going to concentrate on
30:05
Speaker 1: what Jensaki was saying. Because she knows these questions are
30:07
Speaker 1: going to keep coming. She can say whatever she wants
30:09
Speaker 1: about the reporters. How big of a problem are these
30:12
Speaker 1: new emails, Harris, It's a huge problem. I mean, and
30:16
Speaker 1: this has been going on since that laptop first surface.
30:19
Speaker 1: We know there were these conjoined accounts were hunter. Biden
30:23
Speaker 1: even complained to his daughter that he blew half his
30:26
Speaker 1: salary paying pop Pops bills. He was paying the telephone bill.
30:32
Speaker 1: That's Biden. He was paying the telephone bill, doing the
30:35
Speaker 1: taxes there was And the question is, Harris, if the
30:40
Speaker 1: money that was garnered from these foreign interests, which was
30:44
Speaker 1: basically influenced peddling. If that money landed in the joint account,
30:48
Speaker 1: does that put Joe Biden on the hook as part
30:51
Speaker 1: of this FBI investigation we will see. I just can't
30:55
Speaker 1: even imagine how his son, why would you want to, Like,
31:00
Speaker 1: we know about the alleged drug abuse in his path,
31:04
Speaker 1: and I only say alleged because most of it's just
31:06
Speaker 1: on video than bank account with somebody like that. I mean,
31:14
Speaker 1: this guy is a walking, talking reality show. I mean
31:16
Speaker 1: he's living like a drug lord. He's you know, with
31:19
Speaker 1: his brother's wife. He's got hookers, he's got crack all
31:23
Speaker 1: over the table. I mean, you think the bidens what
31:26
Speaker 1: he's got. Yeah, that's all we know at this far.
31:29
Speaker 1: That's what he admits to. But you think they'd want
31:31
Speaker 1: to keep this out of the public eye. Instead, we've
31:35
Speaker 1: now turned to a new grift, which is Hunter Biden artist,
31:39
Speaker 1: And he's put down the crack pipe and picked up
31:43
Speaker 1: the ink pipe. And we're now blowing ink splatters on
31:46
Speaker 1: canvas and selling them for seventy five thousand to five
31:49
Speaker 1: hundred thousand a pop. And I love the idea of
31:52
Speaker 1: offshoring the ethics to the gallerist. Now George Burgess, the
31:57
Speaker 1: guy who owns the gallery. He gets fifty percent of
32:00
Speaker 1: every sale Harris, of these of these items, of these prints.
32:04
Speaker 1: That's the going rate. So how he's the ethics are
32:08
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, I don't understand. And as far
32:11
Speaker 1: as concealing the buyers from Hunter Biden, did where a
32:14
Speaker 1: blindfold at that recent gallery showing in la I don't
32:17
Speaker 1: think so. No, you can see everybody. I mean, there's
32:19
Speaker 1: a video of it. Again. I mean, it's it's just
32:22
Speaker 1: egregiousness in plain sight. So you mentioned half the gallery
32:26
Speaker 1: owner is getting. Didn't they just sell a slew of
32:29
Speaker 1: seventy five thousand dollars apiece. That's a lot of money
32:32
Speaker 1: for the gallery owner. That's a sweet deal. You bet?
32:35
Speaker 1: You bet well, That's what I mean. There's conflicts of
32:37
Speaker 1: interest all over the place. And you know, Harris, the
32:41
Speaker 1: font of this is that group Rosemont Seneca. That was
32:45
Speaker 1: the investment firm that Hunter Biden founded in two thousand
32:49
Speaker 1: and nine. Who did he found it with? One of
32:51
Speaker 1: his partners was Chris Hines, that is the stepson of
32:56
Speaker 1: John Kerry, who at the time was the Secretary of Defense,
33:00
Speaker 1: with the Vice President's son Heinz had the good since
33:03
Speaker 1: when Hunter Bladen joined that Ukraine Energy Board, he stepped
33:07
Speaker 1: back why he was worried about the perception of corruption.
33:12
Speaker 1: You have a layering of information on this, so glad
33:15
Speaker 1: to have you in focus. I mean you hear all this.
33:18
Speaker 1: This has been going on for not just months, for years,
33:22
Speaker 1: for years. Nancy Pelosi came out and she said something
33:27
Speaker 1: to the athletes. Many people were just completely shocked at
33:32
Speaker 1: the way that she spoke to American athletes about what
33:36
Speaker 1: they should do and not do while competing in China.
33:40
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi is a woman, by the way, that has
33:42
Speaker 1: been to China and actually protested in China. It's been
33:47
Speaker 1: caught on videos. She was one of the biggest critics
33:49
Speaker 1: of China early in her career. She went to one
33:54
Speaker 1: of the most famous sites of protests in China and
33:58
Speaker 1: even held up a band. It was taken from her
34:02
Speaker 1: by the Chinese Communist government again early in her political career.
34:08
Speaker 1: Things have changed drastically since then. She's now a protector
34:11
Speaker 1: and a defender of China when it comes to legislation.
34:15
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter what's coming out of her mouth. She's now
34:19
Speaker 1: even protecting China from American athletes, telling American athletes to
34:23
Speaker 1: basically shut up and say nothing. Now, she raised eyebrows
34:28
Speaker 1: when she had this to say to the American athletes
34:31
Speaker 1: in China just a few days ago. Make no mistake,
34:36
Speaker 1: our athletes should participate. They've trained, their discipline, they've dreamed,
34:41
Speaker 1: they've aspired, they've worked hard. But this year we must
34:45
Speaker 1: celebrate them from home as they compete in China. I
34:51
Speaker 1: would say to our athletes, you're there to compete, do
34:58
Speaker 1: not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government because
35:04
Speaker 1: they are ruthless. I know there is a temptation on
35:07
Speaker 1: the part of some to speak out while they are there.
35:11
Speaker 1: I respect that, but I also worry about what the
35:15
Speaker 1: Chinese government might do to their reputations, to them families.
35:22
Speaker 1: That was a warning from the Speaker of the House
35:26
Speaker 1: the United States of America to athletes, do not speak out.
35:29
Speaker 1: Do not risk incurring the anger of the Chinese government
35:32
Speaker 1: because they are ruthless. Now, if this is true, when
35:36
Speaker 1: you can't keep American athletes safe, why are you sending
35:39
Speaker 1: them to China? Or could it be that she's got
35:42
Speaker 1: a back channel deal going on with China and she
35:44
Speaker 1: just said, Hey, I got this, I'll tell American athletes
35:47
Speaker 1: to shut up on American official I'm one of the
35:49
Speaker 1: top people in our government. I'll say that to them.
35:52
Speaker 1: You won't have to worry as much about American athletes
35:55
Speaker 1: speaking out. I'll make them fear you China, and we'll
35:57
Speaker 1: go back to making money. When you hear something like
36:02
Speaker 1: this and the speak of the House, you need to
36:03
Speaker 1: go back and follow the money, which has direct ties
36:08
Speaker 1: to exactly what's going on with a corruption with Hunter
36:12
Speaker 1: Biden and Joe Biden. Now, let me give you a
36:14
Speaker 1: little bit more history of Nancy Pelosi so you understand
36:19
Speaker 1: just how corrupt China is in buying off people like
36:24
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden to put influence on people like Joe Biden.
36:28
Speaker 1: We know about the famous flights to China, we know
36:31
Speaker 1: about the billion dollars in loans from China, we know
36:33
Speaker 1: about the money flowing into the Biden family. And I'll
36:37
Speaker 1: dissect even more of that in a moment. But the
36:39
Speaker 1: same thing that they've done with Hunter Biden and Joe Biden,
36:42
Speaker 1: they've now done with Nancy Pelosi's family. Pelosi has now
36:49
Speaker 1: been accused of being co opted by China due to
36:53
Speaker 1: her husband's finances. That's Right. On Monday is broadcast of
37:03
Speaker 1: Fox News Radio's Guy Benson Show. Representative Michael Walt's, a
37:06
Speaker 1: Republican from Florida, stated that how Speaker Nancy Pelosi soften
37:11
Speaker 1: softened on China about the time that her husband became
37:15
Speaker 1: heavily involved financially in Chinese investments and in Chinese firms.
37:21
Speaker 1: This is exactly what China did to compromise Joe Biden.
37:25
Speaker 1: They used his son and his brother, got them their
37:29
Speaker 1: tentacles into the family, had the money flowing so that
37:35
Speaker 1: the family would make sure that their elected officials in
37:39
Speaker 1: the family would have positive moves and positive influence over China.
37:45
Speaker 1: The congressman went on to say, and this is an
37:47
Speaker 1: example of how the Chinese Communist Party co opts people.
37:52
Speaker 1: Speaker Pelosi urging American athletes to not speak out in Beijing,
37:56
Speaker 1: not to talk about human rights is shocking because she
38:00
Speaker 1: said it would be potentially dangerous for them for their
38:03
Speaker 1: physical safety, for the safety of their families if they
38:07
Speaker 1: did so. When you hear the Speaker of the House
38:10
Speaker 1: saying that you better worry about your family's safety. To
38:13
Speaker 1: an athlete, if you speak out, I want you to
38:15
Speaker 1: think about whose side she's on. Does that sound like
38:20
Speaker 1: she's on the side of American athletes. No, does that
38:24
Speaker 1: sound like she's on the side of the American people.
38:26
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. She's literally doing the bidding, the warfare, the
38:30
Speaker 1: mental warfare of the Chinese Communist government. What do you think,
38:35
Speaker 1: what do you make of that guidance from the Speaker
38:37
Speaker 1: of the House. And isn't that basically a case for
38:43
Speaker 1: why the Unit state should not have our fingerprints on
38:46
Speaker 1: these games at all? If that's what she actually believes,
38:50
Speaker 1: was the question asked the congressman. His response, No, it
38:54
Speaker 1: completely is. But yet she wouldn't support my bill calling
38:57
Speaker 1: for a boycott of the Olympics, Or would she support
39:00
Speaker 1: my bill saying you know what, if you're going to
39:03
Speaker 1: sell products made with modern day slave labor that we
39:07
Speaker 1: know is also building the Chinese building up the Chinese military,
39:13
Speaker 1: then you shouldn't be able to sell to the Defense Department.
39:17
Speaker 1: None of those things she would support. Now, I want
39:19
Speaker 1: you to think about this bill real quick. He put
39:21
Speaker 1: for this congressman put together a piece of legislation that says,
39:25
Speaker 1: if you're a company in China, are you're a company
39:28
Speaker 1: in general that's building the Chinese military. Then you should
39:31
Speaker 1: not be able to procure a contract and get paid
39:34
Speaker 1: billions and billions of dollars from the Defense Department. Nancy
39:38
Speaker 1: Pelosi would not support that bill. If you are arming
39:43
Speaker 1: our enemy, we're not going to allow you to have
39:45
Speaker 1: contracts the United States government the United States military. That's
39:48
Speaker 1: a simple bill that should be bipartisan, and Nancy Pelosi
39:51
Speaker 1: wouldn't even allow it to come for a vote. She
39:54
Speaker 1: blocked the bill. None of those things she would support.
39:58
Speaker 1: And the thing is, she's a always been pretty tough
40:01
Speaker 1: historically about Tibet. She met with a Dalai lama for example,
40:06
Speaker 1: she was tough. But she switched a few years ago.
40:10
Speaker 1: And coincidentally, it was about the time that her husband
40:12
Speaker 1: became heavily involved financially in Chinese investments and in Chinese firms.
40:19
Speaker 1: And look, guy, this is how the Chinese Communist Party operates.
40:24
Speaker 1: They co opt people. Now you look in Nancy Pelosi
40:36
Speaker 1: and how Speaker Pelosi is not warning the Chinese not
40:38
Speaker 1: screw the American athletes. She's warning American athletes to shut
40:41
Speaker 1: up on behalf of the Chinese government. It is very
40:48
Speaker 1: clear that Nancy Pelosi has been compromised compromises. The only
40:55
Speaker 1: word I know to explain this, It's compromised. She is
41:01
Speaker 1: capitulating to the Chinese Communist Party intimidation and censorship, and
41:06
Speaker 1: even telling the athletes there's a good chance that your
41:10
Speaker 1: family could be harmed by China if you criticize. Why
41:17
Speaker 1: is an American elected official at the top of our
41:22
Speaker 1: government saying and doing this? Speaker of the House, Pelosi
41:27
Speaker 1: was once a hardcore activist critic of the Chinese Communist Party.
41:33
Speaker 1: How did she go from being that to changing her
41:37
Speaker 1: tune and now being best friends to Beijing. One simple
41:42
Speaker 1: thing changed Her family was getting rich. That's what happened.
41:47
Speaker 1: Pelosi's stance changed most rapidly during the debate over the
41:52
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight Beijing Summer Olympics, an event human
41:55
Speaker 1: rights activistic cried as a travesty given China's extensive record
41:59
Speaker 1: of atrocities against its own people. Opponents of those Olympic
42:04
Speaker 1: Games in Oa argued at the time that granting China
42:07
Speaker 1: such a tremendous honor and showcase for the Communist Party
42:11
Speaker 1: would embolden it to commit even greater human rights atrocities
42:16
Speaker 1: horrors against people. A year later, China sent parliamentary troops
42:22
Speaker 1: to crush a peaceful protest by members of the Yugur community,
42:27
Speaker 1: killing dozens and setting in motion the events that would
42:31
Speaker 1: lead to the dictator currently presiding over concentration camps that
42:36
Speaker 1: at their peak were estimated to imprison as many as
42:39
Speaker 1: three million people. Early in her career in Congress, Pelosi
42:45
Speaker 1: was one of the most vocal anti Beijing voices in Washington.
42:50
Speaker 1: Pelosi so opposed the Communist Party that she protests against
42:53
Speaker 1: the Tineman Square masker in Tenement Square. In nineteen ninety one,
43:00
Speaker 1: she was a junior member of Congress, Pelosi found herself
43:03
Speaker 1: in timm And Square. She was part of a congressional
43:06
Speaker 1: delegation visiting Beijing barely two years after the horrific events
43:09
Speaker 1: had unfolded. Pelosi covertly carried a banner into the middle
43:14
Speaker 1: of the square and unfolded it in front of a
43:17
Speaker 1: small crowd and the media. To those who died for
43:21
Speaker 1: democracy in China, it read Pelosi actually fought against most
43:27
Speaker 1: Favored Nation trade status for China and bringing Beijing into
43:32
Speaker 1: the World Trade Organization as well. She said, no, then
43:37
Speaker 1: one thing changed all of this. A guy by the
43:43
Speaker 1: name of Paul Pelosi. Paul Pelosi clearly had been watching
43:48
Speaker 1: and learning from Joe Biden. Joe Biden's brother was the
43:53
Speaker 1: bag man for the family business. Joe Biden's brother set
43:58
Speaker 1: up the crime family in my opinion, long before Hunter
44:03
Speaker 1: Biden got involved. Hunter Biden is just the second coming
44:09
Speaker 1: of the crime syndicate. Hunter Biden is two point zero
44:14
Speaker 1: the second generation of the family business. Well, Nancy Pelosi's husband,
44:18
Speaker 1: Paul Pelosi started getting business ties in China, which is
44:23
Speaker 1: exactly what the Chinese Communist Party does. They get their
44:25
Speaker 1: tentacles into you, they compromise you, and then they feed
44:28
Speaker 1: you cash, and then you influence your family members, whether
44:32
Speaker 1: it's Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden, to do what they
44:37
Speaker 1: want you to do. It's called bribery. Pelosi's human rights
44:42
Speaker 1: advocacy disappeared. Husband Paul became a partner and investor in
44:49
Speaker 1: Matthew International Capital Management, a pioneer quote unquote in the
44:53
Speaker 1: Chinese investment market. He also invested in several other companies
44:57
Speaker 1: who succeed in drumming up business in a big way
45:04
Speaker 1: with you guess at the Chinese Communist Party. In fact,
45:08
Speaker 1: the entire success of Matthew's International Capital Management, where her
45:15
Speaker 1: husband and suppose his husband Paul will become a partner
45:18
Speaker 1: it totally. They say, Actually their success or failure depends
45:25
Speaker 1: on how much business they have with the Chinese Communist Party.
45:30
Speaker 1: In other words, if they're not doing business with the
45:32
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party, they will go bankrupt. Paul Pelosi's classmate
45:37
Speaker 1: from Georgetown, Vincent Wolfington, set up a limousine service called
45:43
Speaker 1: Global and Bassaur Concierge, which catered to ultra high net
45:48
Speaker 1: worth individuals traveling around the world. One big market for
45:53
Speaker 1: Global the Beijing two thousand and eight Summer Olympics, which
46:00
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi said okay in Congress. What did Pelosi do?
46:05
Speaker 1: The same exact stuff. This is almost to a tea
46:08
Speaker 1: of what Hunter and Joe Biden have done and Hunter
46:11
Speaker 1: Biden's uncle, Joe Biden's brother. Pelosi had initially been critical
46:17
Speaker 1: of China hosting the Games, arguing that it's human right
46:19
Speaker 1: tricker should quote prevent it from such an honor. The
46:23
Speaker 1: year after her husband bought shares in Global Ambassador Concierge,
46:28
Speaker 1: she revealed she reversed course and opposed a boycott of
46:32
Speaker 1: Beijing hosting the Games. Two years later, Pelosi held between
46:38
Speaker 1: five million and twenty five million in a Matthew's fund
46:42
Speaker 1: specializing in Asian investments. Nancy Pelosi's husband received partnership income
46:50
Speaker 1: between a hundred thousand to a million dollars. That's not
46:54
Speaker 1: all Pelosi. Every time there's a game, as in China
47:01
Speaker 1: is making money. So when Pelosi faced the same situation
47:09
Speaker 1: after the O eight Games and decided in twenty twenty two,
47:12
Speaker 1: what was she going to do? You guessed it. She
47:15
Speaker 1: attacked our athletes and told them to shut up. Now,
47:19
Speaker 1: there was a session of the Olympic Games in Beijing
47:22
Speaker 1: opposed by a large contingency of human rights activists who
47:27
Speaker 1: feared that China's repression may increase even further after two
47:31
Speaker 1: weeks of global praise from the world. Unlike last time,
47:37
Speaker 1: the O eight Summer Games proceeded with heightened problems for
47:42
Speaker 1: any of the minorities because China realized the world was
47:46
Speaker 1: not watching. Pelosi has opposed calls for a boycott of
47:53
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty two Beijing win our Olympics, saying we
47:56
Speaker 1: must support and celebrate our athletes. She hasn't said supported
48:01
Speaker 1: a diplomatic boycott of the event, which is worthless. A
48:06
Speaker 1: diplomatic boycott, to be clear as not a boycott, as
48:09
Speaker 1: diplomats do not compete in the Olympic Games, meaning it's
48:12
Speaker 1: a meaningless, worthless message that you're sending. As one united
48:22
Speaker 1: international community, we have the opportunity and responsibility to whole
48:25
Speaker 1: Beijing to account and to stand up for the human
48:27
Speaker 1: dignity and freedom in the region around the world, Pelosi
48:30
Speaker 1: said in a statement after the administration of President Joe
48:33
Speaker 1: Biden announced a diplomatic boycott of the twenty twenty two
48:36
Speaker 1: Olympics shortly before the games. Pelosi warn athletes, you better
48:40
Speaker 1: shut up. You better not behave like I did in
48:44
Speaker 1: Tenement Square. You better keep your criticism of the regime
48:47
Speaker 1: to yourselves because otherwise your families could be at risk
48:50
Speaker 1: literally threatening the athletes on behalf of China. If you
48:53
Speaker 1: think about it again, Nancy Pelosi's own words to the athlete,
49:00
Speaker 1: She's very clear, she's speaking on behalf of China, and
49:04
Speaker 1: she's trying to put fear into the athletes from the
49:09
Speaker 1: United States of America so that they will comply with
49:12
Speaker 1: China's demands. Make no mistake, our athletes should participate. They've
49:18
Speaker 1: trained their discipline they've dreamed, they've aspired, they've worked hard.
49:24
Speaker 1: But this year we must celebrate them from home as
49:28
Speaker 1: they compete in China. I would say to our athletes,
49:34
Speaker 1: you're there to compete, do not risk incurring the anger
49:42
Speaker 1: of the Chinese government because they are ruthless. I know
49:46
Speaker 1: there is a temptation on the part of some to
49:49
Speaker 1: speak out while they are there. I respect that, but
49:53
Speaker 1: I also worry about what the Chinese government might do.
49:59
Speaker 1: What the Chinese government might do, do their reputations to them. Families,
50:05
Speaker 1: Your families will not be safe. Your families may not
50:09
Speaker 1: be safe. Do you want to be halfway around the
50:11
Speaker 1: world and then your families be attacked attacked by spies,
50:16
Speaker 1: Chinese spies in America. It's up to you, folks. Think
50:19
Speaker 1: about what you're doing now, think about what's happening. Shut
50:24
Speaker 1: up and play. I know that's not what I did
50:27
Speaker 1: in Tiaman Square, but I'm telling you we can't keep
50:30
Speaker 1: you safe in China, so you better listen to me.
50:35
Speaker 1: This whole strategy by government officials in America, whether it's
50:40
Speaker 1: Joe Biden or Nanti Pelosi, is very clear. Shut up,
50:46
Speaker 1: get in line, because we're making money. Shut up and play.
50:51
Speaker 1: Nanci Pelosi. She did the complete opposite of that in
50:55
Speaker 1: Tianaman Square. You keep quiet is what she's telling the athletes.
51:02
Speaker 1: She's telling the athletes, we can't keep you safe in China,
51:05
Speaker 1: so you better listen to me. Shows you how compromised
51:10
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi is. It also shows you how compromised Joe
51:16
Speaker 1: Biden is, which goes back to one of the main
51:20
Speaker 1: spy strategies coming from China. China's main strategy with the
51:26
Speaker 1: US government is not to spy on them. It's to
51:28
Speaker 1: capture elites with connections to the US government, buying off
51:36
Speaker 1: elites like the Bidens and the Pelosis. That's what they do.
51:42
Speaker 1: In Peter Schweitzer's new book, he talks about this, saying
51:45
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party's main strategy is to win. To
51:50
Speaker 1: win involves buying off the elites of the United States government.
51:53
Speaker 1: The process they call elite capture. They have a name
51:56
Speaker 1: for it, elite capture. And they have captured Hunter By,
52:00
Speaker 1: they have captured Hunter Biden's uncle, Joe Biden's brother, they
52:04
Speaker 1: have captured Nancy Pelosi's husband and Nancy Pelosi's son. That's
52:11
Speaker 1: what they have done. They have a name for it
52:13
Speaker 1: called elite capture. They do it all over the world.
52:17
Speaker 1: You go into a country where you need something, whether
52:20
Speaker 1: it's Afghanistan or somewhere else, and you capture elites and
52:24
Speaker 1: you feed them a little bit of cash to make
52:25
Speaker 1: yourselves billions and billions of dollars. China identified the Biden
52:31
Speaker 1: family is one of the primary targets, and it worked.
52:37
Speaker 1: The president of the Government Accountability Institute explained the broad
52:41
Speaker 1: theme in his latest best selling book during a time
52:46
Speaker 1: when everyone, I would say needs to read this. The
52:50
Speaker 1: subtitle of the book is how American elites get rich
52:52
Speaker 1: helping China win. And this reflects a strategy that Beijing
52:56
Speaker 1: has had. They're pretty open about it. Where the strategy
53:00
Speaker 1: is simply to buy off the elites of the United
53:02
Speaker 1: States and other countries. China views itself as in competition
53:07
Speaker 1: with the United States of America. It believes it can
53:10
Speaker 1: win by buying off the elites that pennies on the
53:13
Speaker 1: dollar fractions of a penny on the dollar compared to
53:15
Speaker 1: actually competing with America. They're not actually competing with the
53:20
Speaker 1: US economy and culture. They're just buying it off. In
53:24
Speaker 1: other words, they view themselves as in the competition with
53:27
Speaker 1: the United States America, and this is the best way
53:29
Speaker 1: and the cheapest way to win. When there's a competition
53:33
Speaker 1: between these two countries, they want to win it and
53:35
Speaker 1: they are. They're quite open about that. Presidency has been
53:38
Speaker 1: talking about it since twenty twelve. And they decide the
53:42
Speaker 1: way that they can win and do it on the
53:45
Speaker 1: cheapest way possible. Instead of going toe to toe with
53:49
Speaker 1: an economy and a culture. The way they can win
53:52
Speaker 1: is just by buying off those at the top of
53:54
Speaker 1: the government. It's a spycraft called elite capture. It's the
53:59
Speaker 1: term they use. They're not looking for, you know, leaders
54:04
Speaker 1: to be clones. There's a strategic concept they use to
54:10
Speaker 1: loosely translate means, and the loosely translated mean big help
54:14
Speaker 1: with a little bad mouth. That's what they decide they're
54:19
Speaker 1: going to call it. And what that basically means is
54:22
Speaker 1: if somebody says occasionally thinks about the ugers or about
54:27
Speaker 1: human rights, they may get irritated about it, but that's
54:30
Speaker 1: not a big deal. What they want the elites to
54:33
Speaker 1: do is ensure that they get access to Western capital
54:37
Speaker 1: and they get access to Western technology. As long as
54:41
Speaker 1: the elected officials and corporate executives don't interfere on that.
54:46
Speaker 1: They're very happy to help these elites get rich because
54:49
Speaker 1: they're helping them in such an important way. Now you
54:52
Speaker 1: think about what Nancy Pelosi said, Let's just go back
54:55
Speaker 1: to that for a moment. Think about what the White
54:57
Speaker 1: House is said. Right, they've kind of their risks with
55:00
Speaker 1: human rights, and they've said be fearful of China, don't
55:03
Speaker 1: trust the Chinese, so don't say anything about them. Right,
55:06
Speaker 1: They're doing their bidding for them. They're saying negative things
55:09
Speaker 1: about China that don't really matter because ultimately China's getting
55:13
Speaker 1: what they want, which is a broader silence from the
55:15
Speaker 1: athletes to the Olympic Games. In other words, when it's
55:19
Speaker 1: crunched time. The idea is these elites side with China.
55:24
Speaker 1: That's their strategy. They want access to the Western markets,
55:28
Speaker 1: they want access to money, they want access to research.
55:32
Speaker 1: And one of the most successful targets of the Chinese
55:34
Speaker 1: Communist Party strategy is the Biden family. How do we
55:39
Speaker 1: know this because they paid now thirty one million dollars
55:43
Speaker 1: in deals from individuals with ties to Chinese intelligence. Now,
55:47
Speaker 1: let me be clear about this. Part three is going
55:50
Speaker 1: to be about the money to the Biden family in
55:52
Speaker 1: our expose. The Biden family has now commercial ties in China.
56:00
Speaker 1: They realized they could easily corrupt Hunter Biden because of
56:05
Speaker 1: the hookers and the drugs and everything else. It was
56:07
Speaker 1: an easy target. They realized that Hunter Biden couldn't do
56:13
Speaker 1: any business without trading on his father's name, So what
56:17
Speaker 1: did they do? They started trading with him. They understood
56:21
Speaker 1: the cronyism of his brother as well, and Hunter Biden's
56:25
Speaker 1: laptop and access to the emails made it very clear
56:29
Speaker 1: and easy to piece together how much they got and
56:33
Speaker 1: perhaps more importantly, who made the deals happen? Now the
56:37
Speaker 1: question that you should all be asking yourself, Peter Schweitzer
56:41
Speaker 1: said his quote, who really made it rain for the
56:43
Speaker 1: Bidens in China? Hunter Biden was eager for deals and
56:46
Speaker 1: went over an O nine in twenty ten after his
56:49
Speaker 1: father became vice president. There were a handful of Chinese
56:53
Speaker 1: businessmen that made it rain for Hunter, including a mysterious
56:59
Speaker 1: businessman who aims a twenty million dollars deal for Hunter
57:01
Speaker 1: Biden out of thin air. At the time, that man
57:05
Speaker 1: Fang was also business partners with a vice Minister for
57:08
Speaker 1: State Security in China, which is their spy agency is
57:12
Speaker 1: the equivalent of our CIA. The vice minister's responsibility was
57:18
Speaker 1: foreign intelligence recruitment at the time. So you got a
57:23
Speaker 1: guy name Chief Fang, a mysterious quote businessman who gives
57:28
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden twenty million dollars. This is a fact, And
57:33
Speaker 1: Fang is a business partner with a vice minister of
57:36
Speaker 1: the equivalent of the CIA in China, and that vicemanor's
57:40
Speaker 1: sole responsibility was foreign intelligence recruitment. That should have set
57:46
Speaker 1: off a lot of alarm bells right away in this country,
57:51
Speaker 1: but it didn't, or maybe it did, and people just
57:53
Speaker 1: decided to look the other way because the vice president
57:55
Speaker 1: of the United States of America, another businessman, by the way,
57:59
Speaker 1: that helped with that twenty million dollar deal and wired
58:03
Speaker 1: another five million to a separate Hunter Biden business was
58:08
Speaker 1: business partners, specifically with a daughter of the former Minister
58:14
Speaker 1: of State Security who ran the entire spy apparatus. Now
58:19
Speaker 1: you have to be an idiot to believe that this
58:22
Speaker 1: wasn't all perfectly set up by the Chinese Communist Party
58:25
Speaker 1: in their spy agency. You got a guy that's got
58:28
Speaker 1: a drug problem. You got a guy that's got a
58:31
Speaker 1: hooker problem. You got a guy that's got a lot
58:33
Speaker 1: of issues in Hunter Biden. His dad happens to be
58:37
Speaker 1: the Vice president. At the time, you're flying over on
58:40
Speaker 1: Air Force two. You're trying to get away from the
58:44
Speaker 1: Secret Service, not wanting them to come to any of
58:46
Speaker 1: your meetings. There's no records of these things, and you're
58:48
Speaker 1: flying back home with twenty million cash another five Now,
58:51
Speaker 1: I want you to think about how much money twenty
58:53
Speaker 1: million dollars is to an individual like Hunter Biden. It
58:56
Speaker 1: is the holy grail. I want you think about how
59:00
Speaker 1: little money that is for the Chinese Communist Party when
59:04
Speaker 1: you're getting access to the Vice president United States of
59:06
Speaker 1: America and quite possibly blackmailing and compromising his own family members,
59:12
Speaker 1: including his own brother. I want you to think about
59:15
Speaker 1: what that's worth for a spy agency who is spending
59:19
Speaker 1: hundreds of billions of dollars and all of a sudden,
59:23
Speaker 1: right in front of you got a crack addict who
59:26
Speaker 1: is sitting there begging you for cash, and it only
59:29
Speaker 1: costs you twenty million dollars another five million dollar deal
59:33
Speaker 1: to basically completely own you. I go back to what
59:37
Speaker 1: they called it elite capture. That's what it costs them.
59:43
Speaker 1: It's crystal clear. They made it abundantly clear that they
59:49
Speaker 1: could capture the son of Joe Biden, and Joe Biden
59:52
Speaker 1: wasn't gonna stop it, and he was gonna play game.
59:56
Speaker 1: And what happened, Joe Biden changed his tune towards China.
1:00:02
Speaker 1: That's a fact. I want you to imagine one last thing,
1:00:06
Speaker 1: and again part three Tomorrow we're gonna deal with the
1:00:11
Speaker 1: money and how much money they've actually gotten the Biden family.
1:00:17
Speaker 1: But I want you to imagine the Cold War days
1:00:19
Speaker 1: if an American first family was doing deals with Russia.
1:00:25
Speaker 1: I want you to imagine if Reagan's son would have
1:00:29
Speaker 1: gotten thirty one million dollars from a random Russian businessman
1:00:33
Speaker 1: who had direct linkage to the KGB. There would have
1:00:38
Speaker 1: been alarm bells clinging all over DC and it would
1:00:41
Speaker 1: have never been allowed to happen because our government would
1:00:45
Speaker 1: have realized just how damning that could be. How come
1:00:49
Speaker 1: that didn't happen in two thousand and nine and twenty ten.
1:00:53
Speaker 1: It's because our government is being sold out by the
1:00:57
Speaker 1: elites that have been captured by China and the money.
1:01:03
Speaker 1: In Part three, you are gonna want to hear this,
1:01:06
Speaker 1: because it is even more shocking than I could have imagined.
1:01:11
Speaker 1: If you missed any of Part one, which has gone
1:01:14
Speaker 1: viral on the podcast networks, grab it, Grab Part one,
1:01:21
Speaker 1: listen to it. It's up on the Ben Ferguson podcasts.
1:01:24
Speaker 1: All right. Part three tomorrow will be all about the
1:01:27
Speaker 1: money that Hunter Biden has gotten for the family. You're
1:01:32
Speaker 1: not gonna want to miss that as well. Make sure
1:01:35
Speaker 1: you share our podcast with your family and friends, other
1:01:38
Speaker 1: people that you want them to know this information. Please
1:01:42
Speaker 1: share it