Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / HILLARY TERRIFIED as trial of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann begins with text message bombshell!

Transcript

HILLARY TERRIFIED as trial of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann begins with text message bombshell! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

0:00
Speaker 1: It is a huge week for justice with the Michael
0:04
Speaker 1: Sussman trial beginning, and this is a trial that will
0:07
Speaker 1: refocus attention on all of the Democrats. I would say,
0:12
Speaker 1: a legal activity from the twenty sixteen election where they
0:16
Speaker 1: tried to frame Donald Trump and his associates for crimes
0:19
Speaker 1: they never committed. Crimes of the deep state knew never happened.
0:25
Speaker 1: Collusion with Donald Trump in Russia that they knew never happened,
0:29
Speaker 1: a dossier from Still that they knew was a lie
0:32
Speaker 1: that they knew was fabricated, that they knew was actually
0:36
Speaker 1: created by the Hillary Clinton campaign, including Hillary Clinton authorizing it.
0:42
Speaker 1: So this trial is a trial that everyone needs to
0:46
Speaker 1: be focusing on now. Number one, the media will not
0:50
Speaker 1: be focusing on this trial. Understand that. Now. Michael Sussman,
0:55
Speaker 1: who is he? And I need to remind you of
0:57
Speaker 1: all this because there's been so much news that's happened
1:00
Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden. And if you are listening right now,
1:03
Speaker 1: let me also remind you. In our podcasts, we have
1:06
Speaker 1: a breakdown of many of the lies told by Sessman.
1:10
Speaker 1: We have a five part series on Hunter Biden's laptop.
1:14
Speaker 1: We have a series on Hillary Clinton and the lies
1:18
Speaker 1: and the dossier and how we got to where we
1:20
Speaker 1: are today. So if you missed any of that, make
1:22
Speaker 1: sure you go back and listen to those podcasts because
1:26
Speaker 1: they are evergreen. They will explain so much more about
1:29
Speaker 1: Michael Sessman than I'm going to give you today because
1:31
Speaker 1: I really want to focus on this trial, and before
1:34
Speaker 1: I get to that, I want to remind you about
1:35
Speaker 1: our good friends at Legacy Precious Metals. You know what's
1:38
Speaker 1: happening on Wall Street, you know what's happening the economy,
1:40
Speaker 1: and you know what's happening with your retirement account, your
1:43
Speaker 1: four oh one K. It's getting hammered in these markets.
1:47
Speaker 1: The question is are you diversified to protect and defend
1:51
Speaker 1: your hard earned dollars? Do you have anything invested in
1:54
Speaker 1: gold or precious metals. If you don't, now is the
1:57
Speaker 1: time to take a second look at diversifying your portfolio. Now.
2:03
Speaker 1: My friends at Legacy Precious Metals have a free investor's
2:06
Speaker 1: guide for each and every one of you. Many are
2:09
Speaker 1: running to gold and silver precious metals as a hedge
2:14
Speaker 1: against inflation to protect some of their dollars. So if
2:17
Speaker 1: you're afraid to open up that statement, stop being afraid
2:22
Speaker 1: diversify and take back control of your financial future. Calling
2:26
Speaker 1: it the free Investor's Guide right now from Legacy Precious Metals.
2:29
Speaker 1: It will not cost you a dime one eight six
2:32
Speaker 1: six seven five one twenty two eighteen one eight six
2:37
Speaker 1: six seven five one twenty two eighteen or online at
2:43
Speaker 1: Legacy PM investments dot com. All right, So who is
2:49
Speaker 1: Michael Sussman. Susman is a former Justice Department prosecutor who
2:55
Speaker 1: went on to work at a law firm that has
2:58
Speaker 1: represented long represents a Democrat. So this is a guy
3:02
Speaker 1: part of the deep state. Former Justice Department prosecutor Corocuter
3:06
Speaker 1: who laughed to cash in right as part of the
3:09
Speaker 1: deep state. He has been charged with a serious crime.
3:13
Speaker 1: He's been charged with one count of line to the FBI.
3:17
Speaker 1: Now his trial begins with jury selection, and it's happening
3:22
Speaker 1: in DC. It will focus in part on the controversies
3:26
Speaker 1: from the twenty sixteen presidential election when the Democratic Party
3:30
Speaker 1: tried to overthrow and influence the twenty sixteen election and
3:34
Speaker 1: they tried to impeach Donald Trump because allies that they created,
3:37
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton and the Democrat National Committee created at a
3:42
Speaker 1: meeting with the FBI in September of two thousand and sixteen,
3:46
Speaker 1: Michael Susman, who was at that point a partner at
3:50
Speaker 1: this mega Democrat firm, Perkins Coy, presented computer data suggesting
3:58
Speaker 1: a quote possible computer communications directly between Donald Trump's companies
4:06
Speaker 1: and a Russian bank. That bank was called Alpha Bank.
4:11
Speaker 1: He is now accused of lying to the FBI when
4:14
Speaker 1: he claimed in the meaning that he requested, that he
4:18
Speaker 1: was not bringing them this information on behalf of any client.
4:23
Speaker 1: Prosecutors say that Sessman was acting on behalf of the
4:27
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton campaign and on behalf of a tech executive
4:31
Speaker 1: who gathered the data, Rodney Jove. Now what you need
4:36
Speaker 1: to understand is they asked him, are you representing anybody?
4:39
Speaker 1: And he said, no, I'm here on my own accord.
4:40
Speaker 1: I'm just being a whistleblower. We uncover this and we
4:43
Speaker 1: thought you should know that Donald Trump has this secret
4:46
Speaker 1: line of communication basically with the Kremlin and Alpha Bank. Now,
4:51
Speaker 1: even when the CIA did their intelligence on this claim,
4:54
Speaker 1: they said it was not plausible. They said that they
4:57
Speaker 1: believed it was fabricated information by the person that brought
5:01
Speaker 1: it to the FBI. Yet they still weaponize it and
5:04
Speaker 1: they still use that information to try to overthrow the
5:06
Speaker 1: will of the people by impeaching Donald Trump. We also
5:11
Speaker 1: know that Sessman was lying to the FBI because he
5:15
Speaker 1: builled the hours to Hillary Clinton for the meeting time
5:20
Speaker 1: that he had with the FBI, while claiming he was
5:23
Speaker 1: there on his own accord. Now, the Sessman case marks
5:26
Speaker 1: the first trial to rise out of the work of
5:30
Speaker 1: the Special Council John Durham. That's why also why it's
5:32
Speaker 1: so significant this week. He was appointed, I'll remind you
5:36
Speaker 1: back in twenty nineteen by Attorney General Barr to examine
5:40
Speaker 1: how the FBI and other agencies investigated the Trump campaign
5:44
Speaker 1: amid Russian interference in the presidential election. Durham's appointment in
5:50
Speaker 1: the cases he has filed or quote controversial if you
5:54
Speaker 1: believe the Washington Post. That's how they described it today. Republicans,
5:59
Speaker 1: we've been waiting for the investigation of the investigators. Why,
6:05
Speaker 1: because we want to show clearly that the FBI targeted
6:08
Speaker 1: Donald Trump unfairly. Democrats are already accusing Durham of seeking
6:13
Speaker 1: to punish those who investigated Trump, when we know that
6:17
Speaker 1: the quote evidence that they used to investigate Trump was
6:21
Speaker 1: made up by the Democrats. So of course it's time
6:24
Speaker 1: to investigate the investigators. What does at stake a lot?
6:29
Speaker 1: A conviction could spell the end of Susman's legal career
6:34
Speaker 1: as well as a case to cloud over the long
6:37
Speaker 1: defunct Clinton campaign. It could mean serious consequences for other
6:43
Speaker 1: Democrats and possible jail time for Sussman. Now, acquittal would
6:49
Speaker 1: be damaging right to Durham's credibility and would intensify calls
6:55
Speaker 1: for liberal from liberals that the Attorney General, now Merrick Garland,
6:59
Speaker 1: shut down the Durham investigation. Now, this is what the
7:04
Speaker 1: jury is now faced with. They're going to see evidence,
7:08
Speaker 1: and this evidence that they're going to look at and
7:10
Speaker 1: they're going to have to decide on is whether or
7:12
Speaker 1: not Susman told the FBI a lie when he said
7:16
Speaker 1: he was not acting on behalf of a client. But
7:19
Speaker 1: we know from the Billabile hours that he clearly was
7:22
Speaker 1: acting on behalf of a client, because otherwise why would
7:25
Speaker 1: he have charged that client, Hillary Clinton's campaign for the
7:29
Speaker 1: time he was meeting with the FBI. Now, whether Susman's
7:33
Speaker 1: claims are relevant to how the FBI investigated the computer
7:37
Speaker 1: data will also come up in this trial. Durham is
7:42
Speaker 1: going to argue that if the FBI had known that
7:44
Speaker 1: Michael Susman was working for Hillary Clinton with an agenda,
7:48
Speaker 1: the bureau would have proceeded differently with the information. Susman's
7:54
Speaker 1: legal team says, the FBI knew full well that Susman
7:57
Speaker 1: was a lawyer for Democrats because of Burea had dealt
8:00
Speaker 1: with him many times before. My question is this Democratic lawyer,
8:06
Speaker 1: why was he dealing with the FBI on such a
8:09
Speaker 1: regular basis? And maybe this is something that's happened that
8:11
Speaker 1: we don't we don't even know about. Maybe they've been
8:13
Speaker 1: spying on other Republican candidates or other conservative commentators, and
8:18
Speaker 1: we don't even know about it because apparently, in their
8:20
Speaker 1: own words, Susman he has been they're saying, quote, the
8:24
Speaker 1: FBI knew quote full well that Susman was a lawyer
8:27
Speaker 1: for Democrats because the bureau had dealt with them so
8:30
Speaker 1: many times before. Well, how many other cases how the
8:34
Speaker 1: Democrats done? How many other surveillance programs have they done?
8:37
Speaker 1: How many other shady things have they done against conservatives?
8:41
Speaker 1: When Obama was the president or while Biden's the president. Now,
8:47
Speaker 1: now the key witness in the case is going to
8:48
Speaker 1: be James Baker, that is, the FBI's former top lawyer.
8:54
Speaker 1: That's the guy who met with Susman in September twenty
8:56
Speaker 1: sixteen and received the information. The trial will also feature
9:01
Speaker 1: more than a half dozen current or former law enforcement officials.
9:05
Speaker 1: They're going to be asked to revisit the dates. Towards
9:08
Speaker 1: the end of that twenty sixteen campaign, when tensions were
9:12
Speaker 1: running extremely high inside the FBI's agents pursued cases involving
9:17
Speaker 1: both presidential candidates, one Donald Trump, the other Hillary Clinton.
9:23
Speaker 1: And you may ask yourself, what else does at stake here?
9:26
Speaker 1: A lot? Because Durham's theory of the case is that
9:29
Speaker 1: Sessman was engaged in a kind of joint venture, specifically
9:34
Speaker 1: with a Clinton campaign. He was involved with opposition researchers
9:38
Speaker 1: and computer experts to generate quote news stories that would
9:44
Speaker 1: damage Trump's chances of winning the presidency. This was all
9:48
Speaker 1: about slandering somebody making up lies. Same group also wanted
9:53
Speaker 1: to get the FBI to investigate the allegations of coordination
9:56
Speaker 1: between the Trump campaign and the Russians, as well as
10:01
Speaker 1: spur new stories, new news stories about such an investigation.
10:09
Speaker 1: It's clear from the court filings by the way that
10:11
Speaker 1: Durham's team takes a dem view of this alleged effort,
10:17
Speaker 1: right because it's obvious that this was all created out
10:21
Speaker 1: of thin air. A number of current and former federal
10:25
Speaker 1: law enforcement officials say that quote such opposition research may
10:30
Speaker 1: appear unseemingly, but they said, well, this is just part
10:33
Speaker 1: of what happens. So the prosecutors are going to have
10:37
Speaker 1: to convince a jury in the nation's capital, where they're
10:41
Speaker 1: much more in tune to political shenanigans, that this behavior
10:46
Speaker 1: amounts to an actual crime. In other words, are going
10:48
Speaker 1: to try to act like, well, a lying the FBI
10:49
Speaker 1: is not that big of a deal. It's nothing new.
10:52
Speaker 1: This is just what happens. Now for Durham, this is
10:56
Speaker 1: going to be a very significant moment because he is
11:01
Speaker 1: going to have to do something that has not been
11:03
Speaker 1: done a long time, take down one of the biggest
11:06
Speaker 1: crime families in American history and politics, the Clinton team.
11:11
Speaker 1: This is going to be all hands on deck for
11:13
Speaker 1: the Clinton team, and this is going to be all
11:16
Speaker 1: hands on deck for the media to make sure that
11:17
Speaker 1: this doesn't actually hurt Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton or
11:21
Speaker 1: Barack Obama. Now something interesting has also just happened. Durham
11:27
Speaker 1: has released text messages now allegedly proving that Hillary Clinton's
11:34
Speaker 1: lawyer did in fact lie to the FBI. Sean Duffy
11:39
Speaker 1: talked about this latest development on Fox News, and I
11:43
Speaker 1: want you to hear what he had to say about
11:46
Speaker 1: Durham releasing these text messages that allegedly provide proof that
11:51
Speaker 1: the Clinton lawyer lied to the FBI, and the rest
11:54
Speaker 1: of the media is not covering this. Special counsel John
11:59
Speaker 1: Durham releasing new evidence that seems to show that Clinton
12:02
Speaker 1: lawyer Michael Sussman lied to the FBI after claiming he
12:05
Speaker 1: did not work for the DNC. Sean Duffy Fox, who's
12:08
Speaker 1: contributed the informer Wisconsin congressman, joins us, Now, you just
12:11
Speaker 1: saw that text message on the screen from Michael Sussman
12:15
Speaker 1: to Jim Baker says, I have something time sensitive. I'm
12:18
Speaker 1: coming on my own, not on behalf of a client
12:21
Speaker 1: or company, want to help the bureau. That seems like
12:25
Speaker 1: the smoking gun. Sean, what does this mean for Michael Sussman?
12:27
Speaker 1: And I guess more importantly, overall, the investigation into the
12:32
Speaker 1: origins of the Russia probe overall. Yeah, well, the quality
12:37
Speaker 1: of evidence matters, right, So you can have the FBI
12:40
Speaker 1: testify to the recollection of what was said to them
12:43
Speaker 1: before a meeting. They might have their note that they
12:45
Speaker 1: can refer to and say, listen, I I took immediate
12:47
Speaker 1: notes during the meeting that could be admissible. But when
12:50
Speaker 1: you have a text message from the defendant himself incriminating himself,
12:55
Speaker 1: that is unimpeachable evidence and goes to the quality of
13:00
Speaker 1: the Special Council's case against Assessman. So again I think
13:03
Speaker 1: this is a death blow. But what this says more
13:06
Speaker 1: more broadly about what Hillary Clinton was doing in the
13:09
Speaker 1: Russia hoax was they were trying to dupe everybody, the
13:12
Speaker 1: American people, the press, the FBI. Now, I think you
13:16
Speaker 1: had willing participants to be duped within the FBI and
13:19
Speaker 1: the and the press, But this was a concerted effort
13:22
Speaker 1: to drive this narrative that Donald Trump was colluding with Russia,
13:26
Speaker 1: selling out the American people on behalf of the Russians,
13:30
Speaker 1: and have the American people turn on our new sitting president.
13:34
Speaker 1: Outrageous stuff. And it started with this line to the FBI.
13:39
Speaker 1: Be interesting to see if Hillary is in some real
13:42
Speaker 1: legal trouble because of this is the drip drip continues.
13:46
Speaker 1: Let's go back to that text message, and this is
13:49
Speaker 1: what the jury is going to hear. And I don't
13:53
Speaker 1: know how if you're on this jury, this doesn't close
13:57
Speaker 1: the case immediately for you. That obviously Michael Sussman lied
14:02
Speaker 1: to the FBI, because that's who's being charged with. And
14:04
Speaker 1: again this is the exact text message, Jim, it's Michael Sussman.
14:09
Speaker 1: I have something time sensitive and sensitive. He puts in parentheses.
14:15
Speaker 1: I need to discuss do you have availability for a
14:20
Speaker 1: short meeting tomorrow? He says preemptively. I'm coming on my own,
14:28
Speaker 1: not on behalf of a client or company. Want to
14:32
Speaker 1: help the bureau thinks. Baker responds, okay, I will find
14:39
Speaker 1: a time what might work for you? Now, why did
14:45
Speaker 1: he say he was coming on his own Because he
14:46
Speaker 1: knew he need to get in the door. And two,
14:49
Speaker 1: he didn't want this to go down a different course.
14:53
Speaker 1: He didn't want them to look at it through the
14:55
Speaker 1: eyes of oh, this could be political in nature. You
14:59
Speaker 1: meet take that off the table by saying what he said, right,
15:04
Speaker 1: you immediately take it off the table by coming in
15:06
Speaker 1: and saying, hey, man, this is on my own. I'm
15:09
Speaker 1: shocked by this. I can't believe what we've just switness
15:11
Speaker 1: I can't believe what we just saw. I can't believe
15:14
Speaker 1: what has just happened. You need to know this. I'm
15:16
Speaker 1: trying to give you something that will protect you for
15:19
Speaker 1: you know, and this is an incredible thing that has
15:21
Speaker 1: happened that I've uncovered. You need to know this, right,
15:25
Speaker 1: you really need to know this. This is I'm in shock.
15:28
Speaker 1: And then he walks in, He's like, hey, Donald Trump
15:33
Speaker 1: has got these connections to Russia and this Russian bank
15:36
Speaker 1: and has a secret server set up in a secret
15:38
Speaker 1: communication and you just need to know this. Like what
15:43
Speaker 1: we're witnessing right now is just so horrific and shocking.
15:46
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm just trying to help the bureau here.
15:49
Speaker 1: Now the bureau, by the way, you should also just
15:52
Speaker 1: do their homework. But you gotta understand, apparently Sessman goes
15:55
Speaker 1: the FBI on behalf of Democrats on a regular basis.
15:59
Speaker 1: I can't even imagine. And what else he's funneled the
16:01
Speaker 1: FBI that we don't know about. I wish some of
16:03
Speaker 1: that would come out in this campaign, Like how often
16:05
Speaker 1: do you meet with the FBI. What other things have
16:08
Speaker 1: you funneled to the FBI against conservatives? Have you had
16:11
Speaker 1: other meetings about Donald Trump with the FBI outside of this?
16:14
Speaker 1: Have you lied about other information that you've funneled to
16:17
Speaker 1: the FBI. You're a democratic lawyer, How often do you
16:21
Speaker 1: use the FBI to do your dirty work for you?
16:25
Speaker 1: How often do you lie to the FBI would be
16:27
Speaker 1: another question that I would hope would be asked by
16:29
Speaker 1: the Durham team, because he has regular meetings and part
16:34
Speaker 1: their defense as well, they knew he was political in nature, right,
16:38
Speaker 1: That's what they said. Well, they knew that he's political
16:41
Speaker 1: in nature. They understand the politics as they get it.
16:43
Speaker 1: They comprehend it is this is normal, this is par
16:46
Speaker 1: for the course. How often does this happen is the
16:51
Speaker 1: question that must be asked because if your defenses you
16:55
Speaker 1: go to the FBI all the time and they know
16:58
Speaker 1: all the time you're feeding them information, is a democratic lawyer,
17:01
Speaker 1: what it sounds like is your tax dollars and my
17:05
Speaker 1: tax dollars are now going to the FBI to then
17:10
Speaker 1: attack conservatives with information that's given them from the Clinton
17:14
Speaker 1: campaign lawyers. And it happens a lot. I have no
17:19
Speaker 1: idea what a lot means. Does that mean that every
17:22
Speaker 1: week they're taxing the FBI, going hey, I got something
17:24
Speaker 1: for you, and they want them, the FBI, to do
17:26
Speaker 1: their dirty work and attack conservatives. I hope that comes
17:30
Speaker 1: out in the Durhmam investigation because if this is their defense,
17:33
Speaker 1: and that is their defense, well, the FBI knew that
17:36
Speaker 1: he was a Democratic lawyer and he talks to the
17:39
Speaker 1: FBI all the time. That's their words from the Washington Post.
17:46
Speaker 1: That's their defense, and that's what they're putting out in
17:49
Speaker 1: the media. I'll give you the exact quote again from
17:53
Speaker 1: the Washington Post, right hardcore propaganda Washington Posts. Susman's legal
17:59
Speaker 1: team said the FBI knew full well that Sessman was
18:02
Speaker 1: a lawyer for Democrats because the bureau had dealt with
18:05
Speaker 1: him many times before, many times. How often is many times?
18:13
Speaker 1: And this key witness in the case, James Baker, how
18:15
Speaker 1: often did he get text messages from Sessman? This is
18:18
Speaker 1: the FBI's former top lawyer who cleared his schedule. The
18:22
Speaker 1: FBI deals with terrorism, folks. They deal with massive amount
18:27
Speaker 1: of drugs coming to this country. They deal with you know,
18:30
Speaker 1: opening up day in and day out surveillance on people
18:35
Speaker 1: that are spying on this country, from Russia, from China,
18:38
Speaker 1: from other places. They deal with the most terrible things
18:41
Speaker 1: that happened in America. And the top lawyer at the
18:44
Speaker 1: FBI is like, Yeah, let me clear my schedule for you.
18:48
Speaker 1: Let me clear my schedule for you. Sessmen. You give
18:50
Speaker 1: us great info all the time. Right, Hey, I'm coming
18:53
Speaker 1: on my own, he says, preemptively, not on behalf of
18:56
Speaker 1: a client. Well, how often does he call and say
18:58
Speaker 1: I'm here on behalf of a client? When Donald Trump
19:02
Speaker 1: said the deep state was dirty, I didn't even believe
19:06
Speaker 1: it was this dirty. When Donald Trump said that the
19:08
Speaker 1: deep state was this corrupt, I didn't even believe that
19:12
Speaker 1: it would be this bad. Yet here we are having
19:15
Speaker 1: this conversation right now about how bad it actually is,
19:20
Speaker 1: because it's very clear now that it was that from
19:23
Speaker 1: the very top, the top lawyer at the FBI, he
19:26
Speaker 1: had no problem taking information and using that information to
19:31
Speaker 1: try to overthrow the will of the people. After the
19:34
Speaker 1: election took place. There's a part of me, and I'm
19:37
Speaker 1: very cynical, Okay, there's a part of me that believes
19:44
Speaker 1: that the Democratic Party and many Republicans, for that matter,
19:47
Speaker 1: are soulless. I expect this from Democrats. I expect this
19:51
Speaker 1: from Schumer, from Schiff, from Pelosi. Right the entire time
19:55
Speaker 1: they were impeaching Donald Trump. Now once but twice, they
19:58
Speaker 1: knew the information that they were using to impeach him
20:01
Speaker 1: was created by their own party and paid for by
20:04
Speaker 1: their own party. They knew it was a lie from
20:05
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton. They knew the entire time that they were
20:07
Speaker 1: trying to overthrow the will of the people of the
20:09
Speaker 1: United States of America. That that is not surprising, right,
20:13
Speaker 1: That's what they did. We know that. What is so
20:17
Speaker 1: shocking is that the FBI does it too, because knowing
20:22
Speaker 1: that the top lawyer the FBI would would would allow
20:25
Speaker 1: the politics of this to happen this way. Wow, that
20:30
Speaker 1: is the part I actually am truly shocked about. If
20:36
Speaker 1: you missed any of our deep dive into how we
20:38
Speaker 1: got to where we are today with this Durham investigation,
20:41
Speaker 1: with Hunter Biden, with Hillary Clinton, with her campaign clearly
20:46
Speaker 1: paying for this Russian disinformation campaign against a Trump and
20:49
Speaker 1: the lies and the Democrats, and when they knew it
20:52
Speaker 1: was a lie, and how the CI even said it
20:54
Speaker 1: was clear that this information on Russia and colluding with
20:59
Speaker 1: Trump and Alpha Bank was not plausible. As they put it,
21:02
Speaker 1: that whole timeline. We did an entire series in our
21:04
Speaker 1: podcast on that, so go back and grab those episodes
21:09
Speaker 1: because it's so important. As we are in this trial.
21:12
Speaker 1: Now there's something else I also want to deal with,
21:14
Speaker 1: and it deals with China real quick, because this is
21:17
Speaker 1: really big news that has also not been covered. There
21:21
Speaker 1: are two major stories coming out right now that deal
21:25
Speaker 1: with not only this White House and Joe Biden, but
21:28
Speaker 1: people that work with him and China. One of them
21:31
Speaker 1: is this. We have learned that Biden's Transportation czar recently
21:38
Speaker 1: bought stock in a Chinese company singled out for forced
21:42
Speaker 1: labor use. This is yet another top appointee that now
21:48
Speaker 1: has their fortunes tied to the Chinese Communist Party. President
21:52
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's top appointee, the Federal Transit Authority, recently invested
21:57
Speaker 1: in a Chinese textile company that relies on forced labor
22:02
Speaker 1: for the production of its clothes and footwear in China. Fernandez,
22:09
Speaker 1: Biden's administrator of the Department of Transportation, purchased stock in
22:14
Speaker 1: this leaning company on December tenth, twenty twenty one. Why
22:19
Speaker 1: would you do this if you're the woman who's in
22:22
Speaker 1: charge of the administration when it comes to transportation. Now,
22:28
Speaker 1: this company named Leaning was actually founded by a former
22:32
Speaker 1: Olympic gymnast, Leaning, who's been identified by the US government
22:37
Speaker 1: and human rights groups as relying on forced labor to
22:41
Speaker 1: produce their goods. In China, the Chinese Communist Party routinely
22:47
Speaker 1: subjects the ethnic minority groups in that country to force
22:51
Speaker 1: labor as well. It's torture, mass surveillance, and involuntary sterilization.
22:57
Speaker 1: Welcome to China. Beyond ing on slave labor for its products,
23:02
Speaker 1: Leaning Company has publicly defended its use of cotton from
23:07
Speaker 1: a region in China where Westerners are boycotting cotton coming
23:12
Speaker 1: from there because of what happens to the people there.
23:15
Speaker 1: The company was also praised by the state run Global
23:19
Speaker 1: Times newspaper and an article entitled quote more Chinese brands
23:24
Speaker 1: supporting are cotton amid global giants boycott. The article praised
23:30
Speaker 1: companies who rejected campaigns to end the practice of force
23:34
Speaker 1: labor as well. Now this company Leaning Coming, said a
23:39
Speaker 1: statement sent to the Global Times, that is not a
23:42
Speaker 1: member of the Better Cotton Initiative. A Switzerland based cotton
23:46
Speaker 1: organization that has expressed concerns about what's happening in China leaning.
23:53
Speaker 1: This company also has described there what they do is
23:58
Speaker 1: a important thing for the Chinese Communist government and an
24:04
Speaker 1: important raw material that we use produced in the area
24:08
Speaker 1: that helps with supply chain. Now again you have to
24:12
Speaker 1: ask yourself a question, why is Biden's administrator of the
24:16
Speaker 1: Department of Transportation Agency purchasing stock that is wrapped up
24:22
Speaker 1: and everything I just told you about, especially knowing what's
24:25
Speaker 1: happening now with China now. The purchase also follows another
24:30
Speaker 1: report where The National Pulse revealed that Fernandez's financial stake
24:34
Speaker 1: in another Chinese Communist Party link technology firm was also
24:38
Speaker 1: purchased recently a company called ten Cent. The State Department's
24:42
Speaker 1: Bureau of International Security and Non Proliferation has described this
24:47
Speaker 1: company this is our State Department Bureau of International Security
24:52
Speaker 1: has described this company as quote a tool of the
24:55
Speaker 1: Chinese government, noting the company has no meaningful ability to
25:00
Speaker 1: tell the Chinese Communist Party no if officials decided to
25:04
Speaker 1: ask for their assistance. Even the progressive group Amnesty International
25:10
Speaker 1: rated ten cents data encryption capabilities zero out of a hundred,
25:17
Speaker 1: noting that it hadn't stated publicly that they will not
25:20
Speaker 1: grant government requests for backdoor access to spy on people.
25:25
Speaker 1: And now we have Joe Biden's woman who's in charge
25:30
Speaker 1: of the Department of Transportation Agency Fernandez buying company in
25:36
Speaker 1: two different corporations that are run by the Chinese Communist government.
25:43
Speaker 1: You would think that the media would care about this story. Now,
25:46
Speaker 1: I'm going to hit pause there on that and also
25:49
Speaker 1: tell you something else that's happening that deals with China.
25:53
Speaker 1: Joe Biden just promoted the US ambassador to Ukraine who
25:58
Speaker 1: actually attacked the investigations in the Hunter Biden and Barisma,
26:02
Speaker 1: who also has links to the Chinese. Just remember that
26:07
Speaker 1: headline for a moment, because I have another headline for
26:10
Speaker 1: you that, again no one is covering. Joe Biden's economic
26:14
Speaker 1: advisor actually said there's nothing better than the Chinese Communist
26:20
Speaker 1: Party's economic system. I'm going to read that to you again.
26:27
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's economic advisor, the dude who's advising the president
26:31
Speaker 1: on our floundering economy, which they're doing on purpose because
26:35
Speaker 1: they want communism, actually said there's nothing better, quote unquote
26:40
Speaker 1: than the Chinese Communist Party's economic system. So if you
26:45
Speaker 1: want to know why the economy is doing what it's
26:48
Speaker 1: doing right now, and you want to understand why it's
26:49
Speaker 1: so bad, maybe it's because President Joe Biden's latest appointment
26:53
Speaker 1: to his Economic Advisory Council appears to claim that China's
26:57
Speaker 1: authoritarian economic system in terms of managing market chaos, is
27:03
Speaker 1: something that we should strive for in this country, saying, quote,
27:07
Speaker 1: we can't do anything since the United States is such
27:09
Speaker 1: a free country. Yeah, there you go. We can't do
27:12
Speaker 1: anything because we have freedom, So let's just get rid
27:14
Speaker 1: of it. President Biden is now tapped Dominique n G,
27:20
Speaker 1: the chairman of the East West Bank, to represent the
27:24
Speaker 1: United States on the Asia Pacific Economic Corporation also known
27:28
Speaker 1: as APEC, the Business Advisory Council ABAC that is comprised
27:34
Speaker 1: of a group of business leaders that advises governments on
27:38
Speaker 1: issues in the region. While speaking at the Future of
27:41
Speaker 1: Agia conference back in twenty eighteen, the man who's now
27:45
Speaker 1: advising the President in our Economy praised the Chinese Communist
27:49
Speaker 1: parties authoritarian authoritarian economic system, remarking, Hey, there's nothing better
27:55
Speaker 1: than that. He made the admission while answering a question
27:59
Speaker 1: about the future that Chinese economy and a potential crash
28:02
Speaker 1: in the markets. Now it's even weirder about this guy
28:08
Speaker 1: as when he was speaking about China, the Chinese Communist
28:12
Speaker 1: Party in the authoritarian economic system. How amazing it is
28:15
Speaker 1: the same guy that's now advising the President United States
28:17
Speaker 1: of America on our economy. He actually admitted something that
28:21
Speaker 1: was very weird. He said that China's banks have had
28:25
Speaker 1: problems for many, many years, but then he immediately said
28:30
Speaker 1: they've never once had any problems. Why he says these
28:33
Speaker 1: points to the country's controlled economy and also one party
28:38
Speaker 1: system quote unquote as major factors amittigating a potential crash
28:41
Speaker 1: in China. He then expanded upon China's suppose advantages, drawing
28:47
Speaker 1: a distinction between how the US and trying to respond
28:49
Speaker 1: to market chaos, saying, once they spread these bad rumors,
28:54
Speaker 1: market crash, he explained, referring to China, it happened in
28:58
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen. You saw that in two fifteen, suddenly the
29:01
Speaker 1: Shanghai Stock Exchange dropped like fifty sixty percent. The US
29:06
Speaker 1: would be in a position, he began, claiming the Department
29:09
Speaker 1: of Justice would say that well, we may start an
29:12
Speaker 1: investigation which will take three years. Securities and exchange commissions
29:16
Speaker 1: may take two years. But in China they start visiting
29:19
Speaker 1: whoever spread the rumors and start knocking on doors, have
29:23
Speaker 1: a cup of tea with him, say what are you
29:24
Speaker 1: going to do? Cease and desists, right, he continued, referring
29:28
Speaker 1: to Chinese Communist Party officials. Chinese officials would go into
29:32
Speaker 1: some of these major fund managers say, you know what,
29:35
Speaker 1: for the sake of the country, don't sell. Let's do
29:39
Speaker 1: what's right for the good of the country. Don't sell.
29:41
Speaker 1: And then they tell all of these other publicly traded
29:44
Speaker 1: comedies stop trading for a while. We're going to do
29:47
Speaker 1: whatever we want now. It sounds terrible from a US perspective,
29:52
Speaker 1: He went on to say, you say, wow, this is
29:54
Speaker 1: not free market. This is terrible. But you know what,
29:57
Speaker 1: one point five years later, everything is fine. The Chinese
30:02
Speaker 1: Communist Party explain in g can quote control the media
30:06
Speaker 1: to not get out of control and stop them from
30:09
Speaker 1: spreading rumors that would hurt the economy, along with telling
30:12
Speaker 1: the accounting firms and banking regulators to stop doing this nonsense.
30:18
Speaker 1: He then said, we can't do anything since the United
30:21
Speaker 1: States is such a free country, is there a likelihood
30:25
Speaker 1: that we have a financial crisis in the future the
30:27
Speaker 1: United States of America, He asked, before insisting, Yeah, very possible,
30:31
Speaker 1: because we're assistant that guarantees that would happen. But in China,
30:37
Speaker 1: as long as you have the current regime doing what
30:40
Speaker 1: they're doing, these types of things can always be mitigated.
30:45
Speaker 1: He then said, it sounds totally counterintuitive because you would
30:49
Speaker 1: think that, you know what, the system over there, the
30:52
Speaker 1: lack of individual rights and then the lack of democracy
30:57
Speaker 1: is just horrible. I totally agree with all of that
31:00
Speaker 1: kind of thought. From a different kind of perspective. When
31:03
Speaker 1: you talk about controlling managing a banking system, there's nothing
31:07
Speaker 1: better than that. He praised China's economic system by ending
31:12
Speaker 1: it right there. Now, this is the guy who's advising
31:17
Speaker 1: Joe Biden as we speak on our economy. I wonder
31:21
Speaker 1: what he's telling him in these meetings if he's praising
31:24
Speaker 1: the Chinese commune system and complaining about in America, we
31:27
Speaker 1: just have too much freedom. We have too much freedom
31:30
Speaker 1: of the press, we have too much freedom to investigate,
31:32
Speaker 1: we have too much freedom to expose, and maybe we
31:36
Speaker 1: should take away American rights and shut people down and
31:39
Speaker 1: shut them up and have a one party system, which
31:41
Speaker 1: is exactly what he just advocated for. And this is
31:43
Speaker 1: the guy that Joe Biden's listening to about our economy.
31:46
Speaker 1: So if you think that Joe Biden might be trying
31:48
Speaker 1: to fix our economy, you're probably wrong. In fact, he
31:51
Speaker 1: may be purposely doing everything that he's doing right now
31:53
Speaker 1: to try to hurt you and to take away your money,
31:57
Speaker 1: take away your investment, so that he can control roll
32:00
Speaker 1: you better. Otherwise, why would you put this guy in charge?
32:05
Speaker 1: I hope all of you will take this podcast and
32:07
Speaker 1: share it. Please write us a five star review if
32:10
Speaker 1: you wouldn't mind. It helps us reach more people on
32:12
Speaker 1: the charts. Thank you for that if you've done it already,
32:14
Speaker 1: and if you haven't, please help us with writing us
32:17
Speaker 1: a review, and most importantly, hit that subscribe or auto
32:20
Speaker 1: download button so you can get this podcast for free
32:23
Speaker 1: obviously each and every day, and I'll see you back
32:26
Speaker 1: here tomorrow