Latest / The Ben Ferguson Podcast / BUSTED! Former FBI general counsel who went after TRUMP was top lawyer at TWITTER!

Transcript

BUSTED! Former FBI general counsel who went after TRUMP was top lawyer at TWITTER! · The Ben Ferguson Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Six degrees from James Baker. That is a very interesting
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: headline from Jonathan Turley. Why is the name James Baker matter.
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna explain it to you. He is a very
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: familiar figure that has re emerged with the release of
• 0:16
  Speaker 1: the Twitter files. The New York Post ran an article
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: about the emergence of James Baker, who is a former
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: FBI General Council. He is now at the center of
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: the Twitter suppression scandal as thousands of Twitter documents are
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: released on the company's infamous censorship program, which was much
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: bigger than the Hunter Biden laptop. Much has been confirmed
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: about the use of back channels by Biden and Democratic
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: officials to silence critics on the social media platform for years.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: One familiar name immediately popped out in the first batch
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: of documents release through the journalists that was handpicked by
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk. The name is James Baker. Now, for many,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: James Baker is fast becoming the Kevin Bacon of the
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: Russian collusion scandal. Baker has been featured repeatedly in the
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Russian investigations launched by the Justice Department. And again, this
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: is gonna get completed, So I need you to understand.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna try to stop and explain along the way.
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: James Baker was involved in the Russian collusion investigation that
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: was launched by the Justice Department. He was involved in
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: the hoax involving the Russian Alpha Bank. When Clinton campaign
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: lawyer Michael Sussman, for example, wanted to plant the bizarre
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: false claim of a secret communications channel between the Trump
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: campaign and the Kremlin, it was the guy by the
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: name of James Baker. James Baker was his go to,
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: high high up contact on speed diital at the DOJ.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: Now Baker would actually later testify at Sessman's trial. In fact,
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: Baker's name also appeared prominently in controversies related to the
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: other Russian related FBI allegations against Donald Trump. Then he
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: was effectively forced out of his role in the government
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: in the Deep State due to his role and reportedly
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: found himself under criminal investigation. Then he became a defender
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: of the Russian investigations despite the findings of bias and
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: even criminal conduct. He was also a frequent target of
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump on social media, including Twitter. So what did
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: Baker do? Baker responded with public criticism of Trump for
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: his quote false narratives as he said, I'm not gonna
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: take it anymore. He was forced out of the FBI.
• 2:54
  Speaker 1: And when he was forced out the FBI because of
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: all of his shady work and his corruption at the FBI,
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: pushing false narratives, being on speed dial for the DNC,
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, and Michael Sussman, and he knew that the
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: entire Russian collusion scandal was a hoax. He needed a
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: new job. So where'd he go? You ready for this?
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: He went to none other than Twitter. This guy comes
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: out of the deep state as a disgraced individual. He
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: comes out the FBI. Everybody knows he's a scumbag, con artist,
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: liar and pushed the Russian collusion scandal, and he knew
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: it was alive from the very beginning. This is the
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: same guy that helped bury information that was actually damning
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: to Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and Hillary Clinton. He then
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: leaves in disgrace from the FBI, and immediately Twitter says, yep,
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: we want to hire you. Not only are we going
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: to hire you, but we're gonna make you the deputy
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: General counsel of Twitter. Baker soon became involved in another
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: alleged back channel with a presidential campaign. This time it
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: was Twitter maintained the non public channels with a Biden campaign,
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: And to be clear, Baker didn't stop there with just
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: the Biden campaign. He continued to communicate when Joe Biden
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: became the president and communicated directly with the White House.
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: In fact, Baker then weighed in with the same signature
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: bias that characterized the Russian investigations. Weeks before the presidential election,
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: the New York Post ran that explosive story about the
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: laptop abandoned by Hunter Biden. It contained emails and records
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: detailing a multimillion dollar influenced peddaling operation by the Biden
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: crime family. And not only was Joe Biden's son Hunter
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: and brother James Biden involved in the deals with an
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: array of dubious foreign figures more than fifty countries that
• 4:43
  Speaker 1: were going after the worst people in the world, including
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: Russian oligarchs and the Chinese Communist Party. But Joe Biden
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: was referenced as a recipient or the possible recipient of
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: funds from all of these deals, known as the Big Guy.
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: The Bidens have been long accused of influenced pedaling, nepotism,
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: and other of corruption. Moreover, the campaign was not denying
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: that the laptop was hunter Biden's. In fact, they weren't
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: denying any of it. They weren't denying the key emails
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: that actually confirmed from other parties involved that this was
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: his laptop. They knew not to say it wasn't real,
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: because if they did, then they would be held to pay. Instead,
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: the Biden team requested and used their democratic operatives to
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: just make the story disappear. Twitter I instantly moved to
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: block the story. Why because now we know from the
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: emails internally that they were given a heads up before
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: the story even broke, so that they were ready to
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: suppress the story in silence a story and anyone that
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: shared it, even through direct messages, those links would be
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: blocked and they'd be treated like they were sharing child pornography.
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: That's not a joke. Now, before I get into more
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: of this story, I want to say thank you and
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: tell you about our good friends at Patriot Mobile. They
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: are America's only Christian conservative cell phone provider. They want
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: to make it easy for you to try switching to
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: Patriot Mobile from whatever service you have. Right now, you
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: can give them sixty days to show you why I
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: use Patriot Mobile and why you should make the switch
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: right now. When you try Patriot Mobile for two months,
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: you get your third month free, plus you get free
• 6:20
  Speaker 1: activation now. They offer nationwide coverage on the best four
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: G and five G networks, and they use the same
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: exact cell towers of all of the three other major carriers.
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: You're gonna get the same coverage you have right now,
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: You get the same great service. You get to keep
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: your same cell phone number if you want to. You
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: can even usually use the same phone you have in
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: your hand right now. Now, Why do you want to switch?
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: When you do, they actually stand up for a First
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: and Second Amendment rights, and they give a portion of
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: your bill every month back to conservative Christian causes that
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: we all believe in. So, if you're ready to support
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: a company that's fighting to preserve our God given rights
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: and our freedoms, just go to Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson.
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson, or you can
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: call them nine seven two Patriot. That's nine seven two Patriot.
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: If you're fed up with woke companies that don't care
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: about your values, support a company that actually does make
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: the switch today. Get a free month of service plus
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: free activation patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson or nine seven
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: two Patriot all right now. So when they decided to
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: shut down the story, they knew why and how and when,
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: before the people publishing the story knew what the response
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: was going to be. It even suspended those who tried
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: to share the allegations with others. One of those that
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: was hit was White House Press Secretary Kayley macin any,
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: who was suspended for linking to the scandal and giving
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: information about the laptop. So even inside of Twitter, the
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: moves move actually raised serious concerns over the company serving
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: as a censor for the Biden campaign. The Global communications
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: director Brandon Boorman, who asked if the company would quote
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: truthfully claim that this is part of the policy for
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: barring posts and suspending users. Baker quickly jumped in to
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: support the censorship and said that it's reasonable for us,
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: meaning Twitter, to assume that they may have hacked to
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: get the information, and caution is warranted. He's the chief counsel.
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: Are you going to listen to him? Obviously they did,
• 8:32
  Speaker 1: now keeping in mind that he knew that the laptop
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: was real because he came from the FBI. He knew
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: all of this was real. He knew he was lying
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: on behalf of Twitter at that moment in time, doing
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: the bidding for the Democratic Party and the Biden campaign. Also,
• 8:47
  Speaker 1: he knew that there was never any evidence that the
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: material was actually hacked. Moreover, there was no evidence of
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: Russian involvement in the laptop. Indeed, the US intelligence quickly
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: rejected the Russian disinformation lame. Baker knew all of this
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: because he used to be at the FBI. However, he
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: insisted that there was quote reasonable assumption that the Russians
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: were behind another major scandal. It's the same guy that
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: pushed the Russian collusion scandal the first time and decided
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: to go all in to try to get rid of
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: Donald Trump because the deep state hated him. It's called
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: a coup attempt. So, faced with a major scandal implicating
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden and the corrupt selling of access to foreign
• 9:30
  Speaker 1: governments and foreign figures, including some with foreign intelligence associations
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: with the Chinese Communist Party and the Kremlin, Baker's natural
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: default was to kill the story at Twitter and stop
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: others from sharing the allegations because he knew the story
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: was real. These newly released documents also a show why
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: Twitter was so eager to hire Baker from the FBI
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: despite his role in the Russian collusion controversies. They knew
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: he was a liar, They knew he was an operative
• 9:59
  Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party. Well likely would have been a
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: liability for most companies. Seemed to actually draw Twitter to
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: him for censors and political operatives Within Twitter, Baker likely
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: seemed like a made man quote unquote for a company
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: committed to systemic censorship of conservative information. He would be
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: working with the chief legal officer at the company who
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: function as the company's chief censor, the same person who
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: said I'm not going to allow Donald Trump on the
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: platform any longer and we're going to ban him on
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: January six. Now, Gabe was widely revealed by free speech
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: advocates for her dismissal of free speech principles, an open
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: political bias at Twitter, and that is who James Baker
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: worked with. Not unexpectedly, Gabe and Baker would play prominent
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: roles in all aspects of the suppression of the Hunter
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: Biden scandal. There was hardly a need to round out
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: the quote suspects in the suppression scanal. When must took
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: over the company, both lawyers swatted down internal misgivings to
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: bury a story that could well have made the difference
• 11:10
  Speaker 1: in the closed twenty twenty election. It's striking, by the way,
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: how many of the figures and institutions involved in Russian
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: collusion claims are within six degrees of James Baker. Not
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: only did Baker work closely with fired FBI Director James
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: Comey and other key figures at the Justice Department, but
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: he was an acquaintance of key Clinton figures like Sessman,
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: who pushed the false collusion allegations to the FBI. In fact,
• 11:39
  Speaker 1: he was also hired by the Brookings Institute, which also
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: was a curious Bacon like role in the original and
• 11:46
  Speaker 1: development of the false Russian collusion allegations. None of these
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: means that Baker was a driving force of the scandal.
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: To the contrary, Baker earned his bones in Washington as
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: a facilitator, a reliable and relatable ally to the Democratic
• 12:03
  Speaker 1: causes when it came to the business of the Beltway.
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: It is hardly a surprise the Baker found at home
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: at Twitter, where Caution was always warranted in dealing with
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: potentially damaging story our stories for democratic interests. There's something
• 12:20
  Speaker 1: else that also just broke, and it puts in perspective
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: about the corruption and within the media and Twitter and
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: everything else, and it's this is just a reminder that
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: this isn't really just about Biden. Time magazine has now
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: made their man of the Year Zelinski one of the
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: most corrupt and shady individuals in Ukraine. These are the
• 12:38
  Speaker 1: types of people that the media pushes and is obsessed with.
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: We're sending money over to Ukraine. We have no idea
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: where the money is going. There's no audit of the money.
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: We're giving them more money than the Russian military spends
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: on their military and entire year, all because we've decided
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: he's somehow our guy. This is a guy that is
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: now I'll turn into nothing more than a movie star
• 13:03
  Speaker 1: and immediately Time Magazine's got to be our person of
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: the year. That's what our media really is. Now. Let
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: me go back to another issue here, John Levine sang
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: on Fox News Channel, we really need to see what
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: the FBI was doing with Twitter. We need to see
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: the emails that we're going in and out of the FBI,
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: or at least the ones we can see to Twitter,
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: and that's part of what Musk may be working on.
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: Now take a listen. But let's bring in John Levine,
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: a reporter for The New York Post and Good Mornings, Hugh, John,
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: Good morning. We're making habit out of these Monday mornings. Here,
• 13:38
  Speaker 1: I want to go to call for number six. We
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: heard a SoundBite from Randa Devironment. I just want to
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: emphasize this for clarity for our audience. Her headline, FBI
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: warned Twitter during weekly meetings of Hunter, Biden Hack and
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: League Operation before censoring the post. Here's the line. The
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: extraordinary revelation for the first time lays bare how the
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: FBI was involved in pre bunking the story the laptop
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: which had been in the bureau's possession, the laptop for
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: almost a year. Right, Well, it's key to remember that.
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: You know, we didn't reach out to the FBI and say,
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: here's the story we're planning to write a year in advance.
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: They knew about it because they had access to Rudy
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: Giuliani's cloud. They were spying on him for a year
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: before the publication of our story. Through other investigations, they
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: were running, so they knew of the existence of the laptop.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: And I'll remind you when Joe Biden was vice president,
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: they surely would have known of all of Hunter's schemes
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: and foreign countries at that time as well. So they
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: reach out to Eol Roth, the head of Twitter site integrity,
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: and they're having weekly meetings with him to talk about
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: what you're going to be getting hacks, and they're going
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: to be about Hunter. And we know this because Joel
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: Roth said in a sworn affidavit as part of another
• 14:44
  Speaker 1: lawsuit that he's involved with, that these meetings happened. And
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: I think something we didn't see in the initial trove
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: of documents with Matt Taiebe was more meat on these
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: bones about the FBI's involvement, and that's something I'm hoping
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: subsequent disclosures will reveal. The other thing I thought it
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: was interesting as you had James Baker, who is the
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: general counsel at Twitter, who had worked at the FBI
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: under Komey, making decisions, and when the general counsel of
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: your company comes to you and says, look, you know what.
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: It is not clear cut, but I think out of
• 15:16
  Speaker 1: an abundance of caution. We ought to censoring the General
• 15:19
  Speaker 1: Council of the FBI now at the General Council of Twitter, right,
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: And he was also involved in a lot of the
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: FBI's discredited Steel Dossier, you know, investigations. So what are
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: we to take of this? The media says, the Steel
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: dossier Russia, this is a story, but don't look at
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, interesting goad. The decision on behalf of major
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: media organizations to virtually ignore what was dumped over the
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: weekend is stunning. It may not be surprising to you
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: what comes next to you, It is not surprising to me.
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: You know what comes next to the House investigations, I feel,
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: I mean hopefully, actually what comes next will be more
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: disclosures from Musk and we'll see what Barry what do
• 16:02
  Speaker 1: you what else do you think is out there to
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: be learned from additional disclosures that Musk was talking about.
• 16:07
  Speaker 1: I think we really need to see what the FBI
• 16:10
  Speaker 1: was doing with Twitter. We need to see what emails
• 16:13
  Speaker 1: were going to Yoel Roth. We need to see what
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: Twitter was saying back to them. We also need to
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: see what the FBI and the intelligence agencies were sending
• 16:23
  Speaker 1: to Facebook and to Google. And to see whether the
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: suppression of this information was more widespread because Facebook, as
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: you know, also they were going to do a fact
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: check and then they suppressed the story and pending the
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: results of the fact check that never arrived. And we
• 16:38
  Speaker 1: know that Mark Zuckerberg was on Joe Rogan and he
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: said they had also been reached out to you by
• 16:41
  Speaker 1: the FBA. So on that note, you've got an incoming
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: new Congress now, probably because they're going to run this committee.
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: And Kevin McCarthy was talking about exactly that issue over
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: the weekend with Maria call for number seven guys sound bite.
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: Now we need to start looking at Facebook, at Google.
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: These now have become arms of the Democratic Party, arms
• 16:59
  Speaker 1: of the Biden administration, but they also used the intel
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: community as well to live the American public. Should those
• 17:05
  Speaker 1: people keep their clearances? Should those people still be allowed
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: to have information? Let's see what they do with hearings.
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: But we've been here before, John, and they pretty much
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: went nowhere out of Washington. What kills me is it
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: was kind of a buried lead. In the original Taiebi
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: tweets was all these members of Congress saying, this is
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: the last straw we've crossed the rubicon. You can't censor
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: the free press. We're going to do something, and then
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: nothing happened. We've had two it was two years ago,
• 17:32
  Speaker 1: and nothing has happened. There were a couple of hearings.
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: I know some senators screamed at Jack Dorsey, and there
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: were some good YouTube videos out of it, but nothing happened.
• 17:39
  Speaker 1: So I'm hoping now in a Republican Congress we might
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: start to see real teeth. Well, I think that there's
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: fifty one national security people that signed on to this
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: idea that it was Russian disinformation. I think it's very
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: interesting how they got to that information, how they got
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: to that conclusion, and a House hearing could possibly expose that.
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: By the way, all these people that sign that letter,
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: let's go back to that, right remember, right for the election,
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: all of these different former FBI CIA directors signed onto
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: this letter saying that they believe that the laptop was
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: in fact Russian disinformation. They all came out with this letter,
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: made big news, and that gave cover to the media
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: to not cover the scandal, or to at least cover
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: it by saying this is crap and not real. That's
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: why they wrote that letter. I cannot wait to see
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: who started that letter, who orchestrate that letter, What will
• 18:33
  Speaker 1: come out of Twitter on that letter and those in
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: Congress when the Republicans take control. Kevin McCarthy should bring
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: them before hearings in Congress as former directors immediately and say,
• 18:45
  Speaker 1: all right, tell us how you got to the conclusion. Guys,
• 18:48
  Speaker 1: who organized you, who put you guys up to this?
• 18:52
  Speaker 1: And were you guys acting on behalf of the presidential campaign?
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: What jobs were you offered? What were you promised for
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: pulling this off? For doing this? Those are questions that
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: should be asked, as are important questions that should be asked.
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: And that's what John Levine is saying here. We really
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: know now that the FBI was meeting weekly. Okay, it
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: was meeting weekly with big tech. Now this is not
• 19:20
  Speaker 1: just Twitter. Okay, this is not just Twitter. This is
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: something that's going to keep happening at all of the
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: big tech. I want to know how much of this
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: is happening, for example, at Facebook, at Google, at YouTube.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: Miranda Divine said quote that the censorship of the Hunter
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: by Laptop as she now is described it was pre
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: ordered by the intel community because they were spying on
• 19:45
  Speaker 1: all the people that were doing the investigation into the
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: laptop within the media. Well, I think us failed to
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: deliver was the crucial bit about the censorship, which was
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: that it was pre ordered by the FBI. At that point,
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: in the weeks before the twenty twenty election, the FBI
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: was meeting with these big tech companies with Google, Apple, Twitter,
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: and Facebook on a weekly basis, and it was talking
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: to them about disinformation. Now specifically, let me just say
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: this about the weekly meetings. I can't imagine that every
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: single damn week you had enough intel to be sharing.
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: I just can't see it. I can't understand it. I
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: can't imagine it. Okay, I really can't. I cannot imagine
• 20:42
  Speaker 1: that there was enough intel to justify the weekly meetings. Now,
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: I do believe that there was probably enough people that
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: you wanted to silence, okay, every week for saying things
• 20:55
  Speaker 1: on social media about you. Now that I believe, I'm
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: sure a weekly meeting of saying hey, I needs you
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: get rid of this and needs to get rid of that,
• 21:04
  Speaker 1: I need you to get rid of this, and needs
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: you to move this, and needs you to silence this,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: and needs you to get rid of these tweets. I mean,
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: we see it now. In these internal emails have been
• 21:12
  Speaker 1: released by Elon Musk, the Democratic Party was sending emails
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: on a regular basis to Twitter with some people that
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: were famous and some that were nobodies, but their tweets
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: had gone viral that were critical. Okay, that we're critical,
• 21:29
  Speaker 1: that we're mean, There were means spirited or critical, and
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: so what they decided to do then was just silence
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: or banned them, shut them down, shut them off, make
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: sure that those tweets never saw the light of day.
• 21:45
  Speaker 1: That was the whole goal in narrative and objective of
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: the weekly meetings. There wasn't enough national security issues to
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: be meeting with big tech every week. What the FBI
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: did was they said, hey, we are acting on behalf
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party and weekly we need meet with
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: you to tell you things that we really want you
• 22:02
  Speaker 1: and need you to silence. That's what we are going
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: to do, and that's exactly what they did quickly. I
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: also want to say thank you to our sponsor. Without them,
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: this podcast wouldn't exist. And Legacy Precious Metals is wanting
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: to help you diversify your financial portfolio. If you've been
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: freaking out over what's happening with your IRA, with your
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: four oh one K, with your investments on Wall Street.
• 22:23
  Speaker 1: The question is did you invest in gold or silver?
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: Did you diversify your investments so that there is a
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: hedge with your portfolio for inflation. Well, that's exactly what
• 22:35
  Speaker 1: gold and silver has done for so many It is
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: a hedge to protect when it comes to inflation. Right
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: now is actually a great time for you to protect
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: your investments with gold and silver. No, you didn't miss
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: the opportunity. No, it's not too late. So calling it
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: the Investor's Guide from the company that not only do
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: I use, but I also trust online at Legacy PM
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: invests dot com. That's Legacy PM Investments dot Com. You
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: can also call them and get the Investor's Guide for
• 23:07
  Speaker 1: free one eight six six seven five one twenty two
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: eighteen one eight six six seven five one twenty two eighteen.
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: Also reminder, make sure you hit that auto download or
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: subscribe button now so you can get this podcast every
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: day for free. And make sure you share this podcast
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: on social media by hitting that little forward button right now.
• 23:29
  Speaker 1: So there's a couple of things that are standing out
• 23:32
  Speaker 1: in these drops. The Twitter documents and that is the
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: corruption within the FBI, the deep state, the White House
• 23:44
  Speaker 1: went far beyond, okay, far far beyond just a Hunter
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: Biden's story. Really, the Hunter Biden's story didn't matter that much, right,
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: Biden's campaign isn't the government. Twitter made a private decision
• 23:59
  Speaker 1: to limit the Hunter Biden story. Is now the official
• 24:02
  Speaker 1: response of the Democratic Party saying this is totally fine.
• 24:06
  Speaker 1: It's fine for the Democratic Party. They're now claiming it's
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: totally normal for the DNC, the Democratic Party, to look
• 24:16
  Speaker 1: at Twitter to do the silencing of their political enemies.
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: This is how fast the media is coalescing behind this idea.
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: MSNBC had an entire segment dedicated to this, and here
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: is what they said, saying, hold on, just because the
• 24:35
  Speaker 1: Biden campaign was sending emails to Twitter and telling Twitter
• 24:39
  Speaker 1: which Republicans, which conservatives, which tweets to make disappear, which
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: people to kick off their platform, doesn't actually mean that
• 24:48
  Speaker 1: they did anything wrong. That's their official line, and they're
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: going to sell this to the public because now they're
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: having it met. Okay, everything we told you was not
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: happening is in fact happening. Listen to this from MSNBC
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: complained about the collapse of civility on the site. They're
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: not wrong, and recent data backs their observations. Soon after
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: Musk acquired the platform, which hosts around four hundred and
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: fifty million active monthly users, he issued a general amnesty
• 25:16
  Speaker 1: that restored hundreds of accounts belonging to far right figures,
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: white nationalists, and QAnon adherents. And you can imagine what
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: happened next, but here it is in numbers. Slurs against
• 25:25
  Speaker 1: Black Americans increased by two hundred and two percent after
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: Musk took over. According to The New York Times, slurs
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: against gay men spiked by fifty eight percent, and anti
• 25:33
  Speaker 1: Semitic post soared more than sixty one percent in the
• 25:36
  Speaker 1: two weeks after Musk acquired the site. Musk also brought
• 25:39
  Speaker 1: back controversial far right figures like the neo Nazi Andrew Anglin,
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: the editor of The Daily Stormer and openly racist and
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: fascist publication. For Musk, who calls himself a free speech absolutist,
• 25:51
  Speaker 1: the act of restoring previously restricted accounts is some kind
• 25:54
  Speaker 1: of crusade to free big tech from imaginary control by
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: the political left. To a s at this point, just
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: this week, hold on the imaginary left. The actual emails
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: from Twitter show that there's not an imaginary left that
• 26:13
  Speaker 1: was controlling Twitter. It was the actual left, the Democratic
• 26:17
  Speaker 1: National Committee and the Democratic Party and the Democratic Whitehouse.
• 26:23
  Speaker 1: It was sending emails to Twitter saying ban these people.
• 26:26
  Speaker 1: It's in their own words, we have the files. Second thing,
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: when you hear MSNBC here saying oh wow, and this
• 26:35
  Speaker 1: is you know, he's bringing back all of these horrible,
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: terrible people and all these races and bigots and all
• 26:41
  Speaker 1: this is happening, you have to understand something. I believe
• 26:46
  Speaker 1: you should have the right to burn the American flag.
• 26:49
  Speaker 1: That's what freedom actually is. I also might kick your
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: as if I see you do it. There are a
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: lot of things that people say on the Democratic side,
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: for example, that I disagree with. Okay, I do I
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: disagree with it. I disagree with it wholeheartedly. I can't
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: stand many of the things that the Democratic Party actually
• 27:19
  Speaker 1: says and actually stands for. Do I believe they should
• 27:24
  Speaker 1: be silenced or shut down? Of course not, because that's
• 27:28
  Speaker 1: what freedom of speech is about, and that's what Elon
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: Musk is doing. Do I believe that the KKK should
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: have the right to exist yes. Do I believe that
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: those that hate white people should have a right to exist? Yes?
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: Does that mean that I don't denounce them? Does that
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: mean that we don't expose them or mock them, or
• 27:47
  Speaker 1: or make it clear who they really are? Do you
• 27:50
  Speaker 1: have the right to say terrible things? Yes, because when
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: you start limiting free speech, and yes, we have limits
• 27:58
  Speaker 1: on it, like you can't scream five or in a
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: crowded theater. Right, we have laws like that. That makes sense.
• 28:05
  Speaker 1: But what the Democratic Party was doing, what the White
• 28:09
  Speaker 1: House was doing, was saying we get to decide what
• 28:12
  Speaker 1: free speech is okay and what free speech is not okay.
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: We are the arbiters of what can and cannot be said.
• 28:21
  Speaker 1: So bringing people back to Twitter the way that Elon
• 28:26
  Speaker 1: Musk has allowed them to come back to Twitter was
• 28:28
  Speaker 1: still having rules. Is truly about freedom of speech? And
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: when we start limiting free speech, not when we start
• 28:38
  Speaker 1: we have The Democratic Party has been limiting free speech.
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: Big tech at Google has been limiting free speech. They've
• 28:45
  Speaker 1: been picking winners and losers with emails. YouTube has been
• 28:49
  Speaker 1: picking winners and losers with content. Facebook has been silencing
• 28:54
  Speaker 1: and censoring and shutting down and suppressing conservative viewpoints, picking
• 29:00
  Speaker 1: winners and losers. And that's what MSNBC is saying right now.
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: They're saying it's okay to silence and censor and shut
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: people down. We believe in that because we only believe
• 29:11
  Speaker 1: what should be said are the things that we believe
• 29:14
  Speaker 1: you should be able to say. We will tell you
• 29:17
  Speaker 1: what you can say and what you can't say. We
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: will tell you what stories you can put out there
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: and which ones you can't, and the stories that we
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: don't like, like the Hunter Biden laptop story, because it
• 29:28
  Speaker 1: obviously does something very big, right, What it does is huge.
• 29:37
  Speaker 1: What it does is show the corruption of the Biden
• 29:40
  Speaker 1: crime family. And they knew it was going to cost
• 29:43
  Speaker 1: the election, and they couldn't afford that. They had to
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: get rid of Donald Trump and they interfered in our elections.
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: Isn't that what Democrats we go back to. They knew,
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: by the way that the Russian inclusion story was a
• 29:55
  Speaker 1: hoax because they created it, They funded it, they wrote
• 29:58
  Speaker 1: the movie script. We know that the Democratic National Committee
• 30:04
  Speaker 1: and Hillary Clinton's campaign came up with it and paid
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: for it, right, and paid for it, I'm gonna say
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: it again, and paid for it. We know that we
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: know it one hundred percent, and they use it to
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: try to overthrow the will of the people. Everyone understand
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: what you're up against. This is what they do in
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: third world countries. This is what they also do in
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: places like Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Venezuela, Cuba, China, and Russia.
• 30:44
  Speaker 1: And that is what they are saying is the only
• 30:47
  Speaker 1: thing that is acceptable. Those the only things that are
• 30:51
  Speaker 1: acceptable to believe and or say. And you want me
• 30:56
  Speaker 1: to feel sorry for the people involved at Twitter for
• 31:02
  Speaker 1: being exposed, or at Facebook who are going to be exposed,
• 31:07
  Speaker 1: give me a break. I'm not gonna feel sorry for
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: any of them. And why should any of us feel
• 31:14
  Speaker 1: sorry for them? They were the ones that were rigging
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: the election. Was the election rigged? At this point, I
• 31:20
  Speaker 1: think it's very clear it was rigged. When the entire
• 31:24
  Speaker 1: media is silencing a real news story because they know
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: that story will cost a Kennet the election, how can
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: you say that's not a rigged election. That is the
• 31:34
  Speaker 1: definition of a rigged election. Was Donald Trump right pretty much?
• 31:40
  Speaker 1: Every time he said they're spying on me? He was right?
• 31:42
  Speaker 1: They said he was crazy? Was he right when he
• 31:46
  Speaker 1: said that Republicans were being silenced and suppressed. Yes, he
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: was absolutely right when he said that. Was he right
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: when he said that the media is corrupt to the core. Yes,
• 31:57
  Speaker 1: he was right when he said that. When he said
• 32:00
  Speaker 1: that the media picks winners and losers and the media
• 32:02
  Speaker 1: doesn't do their job and that they are fake news,
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: was he right? Yes? Make sure, by the way, that
• 32:09
  Speaker 1: you share this podcast with your family and friends. Hit
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: that little forward arrow and text it or put it
• 32:16
  Speaker 1: on social media while the media does everything you can
• 32:19
  Speaker 1: to try to shut you down, silence us, and make
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: sure no one knows what's really happening. Also, hit that
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: auto download or subscribe button so you get this podcast
• 32:27
  Speaker 1: each and every day for free. And I'll see you
• 32:30
  Speaker 1: back here tomorrow.