Latest / Connecting the Dots / Apple's Price Pressures, AI Export Restrictions, and Unfixable Guardrails

Transcript

Apple's Price Pressures, AI Export Restrictions, and Unfixable Guardrails · Connecting the Dots

• 0:00
  Today's tech news moves fast, but understanding
• 0:03
  it shouldn't be hard. That's why Snarfl Solutions
• 0:06
  Group brings you Connecting the Dots, where we
• 0:09
  break down what's happening in tech and why it
• 0:11
  matters to you. Now, let's dive in with your
• 0:14
  hosts. I told you that being absolutely terrible
• 0:18
  at coding is actually your biggest advantage
• 0:20
  in the new economy. I mean, it sounds crazy,
• 0:23
  but it's true. Right. and that the very same
• 0:27
  software that is about to make your next smartphone
• 0:29
  hundreds of dollars more expensive is, you know,
• 0:33
  actively causing a massive diplomatic crisis
• 0:35
  in Europe. Yeah, it's all connected. We're looking
• 0:37
  closer at the hidden forces reshaping your wallet,
• 0:40
  your workplace, and, well, the global balance
• 0:43
  of power. Welcome to the show. I'm Alex, and
• 0:46
  sitting across from me is Morgan. We are your
• 0:49
  professional, hopefully somewhat charismatic,
• 0:52
  co -hosts of Connecting the Dots, broadcasting
• 0:54
  live from Snarfful Solutions Group right here
• 0:57
  in Sacramento, California. It is fantastic to
• 1:00
  be here with you. Today is Thursday, June 18,
• 1:03
  2026. Before we get into the heavy hitters of
• 1:06
  the tech world, let's do a quick vibe check on
• 1:08
  the day's data. Always a good idea. Right. So
• 1:11
  if you are stepping out here in Sacramento, you're
• 1:13
  in luck. We've got a beautiful sunny day hitting
• 1:15
  86 degrees Fahrenheit with a really nice light
• 1:18
  breeze somewhere between like five and 14 miles
• 1:20
  per hour. Oh, that is just pristine patio weather.
• 1:23
  Exactly. But if you are traveling or listening
• 1:27
  from. Elsewhere in the country you might want
• 1:29
  to double check your itinerary nationally. We're
• 1:31
  looking at 400 active weather alerts Wow 400
• 1:34
  yeah and 283 of those are overland So definitely
• 1:38
  head over to weather gov to see if your area
• 1:40
  is affected before you you know hit the road
• 1:42
  Yeah, the weather systems have been incredibly
• 1:44
  volatile this week always good to be prepared
• 1:46
  for sure moving over to the markets It was well
• 1:49
  bit of a red day on Wall Street yesterday The
• 1:51
  Dow closed down 445 points, which is about a
• 1:55
  0 .86 % drop. The S &P 500 also dipped, losing
• 2:01
  104 points, or 1 .39%. And if you are watching
• 2:05
  the crypto boards, Bitcoin took a slight dip
• 2:07
  as well, closing at $64 ,318. It really looks
• 2:11
  like a broader cooling off period across, you
• 2:14
  know, both traditional equities and digital assets.
• 2:16
  It definitely does. And finally, just a mixed
• 2:19
  bag for local sports from the 17th. The SF Giants
• 2:22
  gave us something to cheer about with a solid
• 2:24
  7 -2 win against the Braves. Robbie Ray took
• 2:26
  the win on the mound for that one. But on the
• 2:28
  other side of the bay, the Oakland A's dropped
• 2:30
  their game to the Pirates 4 -12. And for the
• 2:32
  basketball fans out there, no Kings games report
• 2:35
  right now. Well, we will absolutely take the
• 2:38
  Giants win where we can get it. Oh, no complaints
• 2:40
  here. All right, let's get into today's Morningstar
• 2:43
  Tech Report for this deep dive. We have a massive
• 2:46
  lineup. We're looking at Apple's impending and
• 2:49
  apparently unavoidable price hikes. Right. Then
• 2:52
  we are shifting into this intense geopolitical
• 2:54
  standoff over the world's most advanced artificial
• 2:57
  intelligence. Let's unpack this. Today's episode
• 3:01
  is brought to you by Strong Coffee, the premium
• 3:03
  instant coffee that tastes like a traditional
• 3:05
  brew but is packed with 15 grams of protein,
• 3:08
  MCTs, and adaptogens like ashwagandha. Get clean,
• 3:11
  sustained energy without the jitters. Use promo
• 3:14
  code SNARFL for 20 % off at strongcoffeecompany
• 3:17
  .com. So the AI boom is officially coming for
• 3:20
  your wallet. Yeah, it really is. Tim Cook recently
• 3:22
  sat down for an interview with the Wall Street
• 3:24
  Journal and he delivers some news that... frankly
• 3:27
  no consumer ever wants to hear. He stated that
• 3:29
  massive price hikes on upcoming Apple products
• 3:32
  are simply unavoidable and that the current supply
• 3:35
  chain reality they're facing is just unsustainable.
• 3:39
  And you know, the culprit here is directly tied
• 3:42
  to the physical infrastructure required to run
• 3:44
  artificial intelligence. Which is wild to think
• 3:46
  about. Right, because when we visualize AI, we
• 3:49
  usually picture like lines of code, algorithms,
• 3:51
  chat interfaces. Is that for stuff? Exactly.
• 3:55
  But AI is incredibly reliant on physical hardware.
• 3:58
  Specifically, it is devouring the global supply
• 4:01
  of memory and storage chips. Wait, hold on. When
• 4:04
  I think of AI, I think of massive computing power,
• 4:07
  right? Companies buying up huge NVIDIA GPUs that
• 4:10
  do... billions of calculations a second. Sure.
• 4:13
  So why is Apple getting outbid on memory and
• 4:15
  storage? Isn't memory just the digital filing
• 4:18
  cabinet where things are saved? Why is that the
• 4:20
  bottleneck? That is a very common misconception.
• 4:23
  AI isn't just compute heavy. It is fundamentally
• 4:25
  memory bound. Okay, how so? Well, think about
• 4:28
  how a large language model works. It has billions,
• 4:32
  sometimes trillions of parameters or weights.
• 4:35
  Every single time the AI generates a single word,
• 4:38
  it has to load those billions of parameters from
• 4:40
  the memory into the processor. Oh, wow! Do the
• 4:43
  math and then move on to the next word. It's
• 4:45
  a massive amount of data moving constantly. Ah,
• 4:49
  I see. So the processor is like the factory,
• 4:51
  but the memory is the conveyor belt feeding materials
• 4:54
  into the factory. Exactly. It doesn't matter
• 4:56
  how fast your factory can build things if the
• 4:59
  conveyor belt is too slow or too small. The whole
• 5:02
  operation just stars. That is the perfect way
• 5:04
  to look at it. And to prevent that starvation,
• 5:07
  AI data centers require something called High
• 5:09
  Bandwidth Memory, or HBM. Okay. It is a highly
• 5:12
  specialized, incredibly dense type of memory
• 5:14
  chip. Because the AI companies are willing to
• 5:17
  pay massive, I mean, almost unbelievable premiums
• 5:20
  for HBM, the chip manufacturers, companies like
• 5:23
  Samsung and SK Hynex, are actively shifting their
• 5:26
  production lines. Makes sense, follow the money.
• 5:28
  Right. They are literally tearing down the manufacturing
• 5:30
  lines that used to make consumer device memory.
• 5:33
  You're kidding. And re -dinging them to make
• 5:35
  server -grade AI memory. Which obviously creates
• 5:38
  a massive supply. vacuum for consumer electronics.
• 5:41
  Yeah. It really reminds me of a normal everyday
• 5:43
  family trying to buy a starter house in a crazy
• 5:46
  real estate market. Oh, absolutely. They save
• 5:48
  up, they put in a competitive offer and then
• 5:50
  suddenly a massive corporate buyer swoops in
• 5:54
  with an all cash over asking offer and just takes
• 5:58
  the property. Yeah. The AI corporations are the
• 6:01
  all cash buyers here. And even Apple, one of
• 6:04
  the wealthiest, most powerful supply chain operators
• 6:07
  on earth, is getting entirely outbid. And Tim
• 6:10
  Cook actually likened this dynamic to a 100 -year
• 6:12
  flood in the supply chain. He stated he hasn't
• 6:15
  seen anything disrupt the market this violently
• 6:18
  in over 40 years. So what does that mean for
• 6:20
  you, the consumer? Well, the real -world impact
• 6:22
  is pretty steep. Market analysts are projecting
• 6:25
  that the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could cost around
• 6:28
  $270 more. Just for the phone. Yeah, just so
• 6:30
  Apple can maintain its current profit margins.
• 6:33
  And they're already doing this quietly across
• 6:35
  their other products, right? Yeah. The base price
• 6:37
  of the new Mac Mini just jumped from $599 for
• 6:41
  $799. They didn't even raise the price of the
• 6:44
  entry level components. They just eliminated
• 6:47
  the lowest tier option entirely because they
• 6:50
  can't source those chips cheaply enough anymore.
• 6:52
  And you know, this hardware crisis has a really
• 6:54
  fascinating geopolitical twist to it, too. Oh,
• 6:57
  yeah. President Trump recently announced on Truth
• 6:59
  Social that Intel has struck a massive deal to
• 7:03
  manufacture Apple's chips right here in the United
• 7:06
  States. Which is a huge pivot because Apple has
• 7:08
  historically relied almost entirely on Taiwan.
• 7:11
  for its processor manufacturing. Exactly. Bringing
• 7:14
  that production to U .S. soil is a frantic effort
• 7:16
  to diversify their manufacturing base and secure
• 7:20
  a domestic supply chain that isn't vulnerable
• 7:23
  to international shipping bottlenecks or foreign
• 7:25
  conflicts. It really is. And the administration
• 7:28
  had actually laid the groundwork for this earlier.
• 7:30
  Back in August, the U .S. government made an
• 7:32
  $8 .9 billion investment in Intel, taking roughly
• 7:35
  a 10 percent stake in the company. In his recent
• 7:37
  post, the president highlighted how massively
• 7:40
  that investment has grown. Intel's overall market
• 7:43
  value has surged from around $100 billion at
• 7:45
  the time of the investment to over $600 billion
• 7:48
  today. It's crazy. It really reframes how we
• 7:52
  look at physical hardware. It isn't just consumer
• 7:55
  electronics anymore. Semiconductor manufacturing
• 7:58
  is straight up being treated as a critical core
• 8:00
  component of national security. And that reality
• 8:03
  creates the perfect bridge to our next story.
• 8:05
  Yeah. Because if Washington is treating the physical
• 8:08
  hardware like a national security asset, They
• 8:10
  are treating the actual AI software like a weapon
• 8:13
  of mass destruction that needs to be locked and
• 8:16
  evolved. Exactly. So let's look at the gap between
• 8:18
  that geopolitical panic and the international
• 8:21
  business landscape. Because if hardware is getting
• 8:23
  expensive, the software is getting heavily guarded.
• 8:26
  Right. We are moving from the physical chip shortage
• 8:28
  to an intense geopolitical tug of war over the
• 8:32
  AI software itself, specifically. A massive standoff
• 8:35
  between the leading AI company, Anthropic, and
• 8:38
  the White House. This is an incredibly complex
• 8:41
  situation. So the Trump administration recently
• 8:44
  utilized an export control directive that effectively
• 8:47
  forced Anthropic to pull its most advanced AI
• 8:50
  models, known as Mythos and Fable 5, completely
• 8:53
  offline for international users. And just to
• 8:56
  clarify for everyone listening, since Fable 5
• 8:58
  is essentially the public, heavily safeguarded
• 9:01
  face of their absolute cutting edge frontier
• 9:03
  model, Mythos, taking it offline is a massive
• 9:07
  blow to their user base. Oh, definitely. So what
• 9:09
  actually triggered the administration to drop
• 9:11
  the hammer like this? Well, the primary catalyst
• 9:13
  appears to be an anthropic initiative called
• 9:16
  Project Glasswing. Anthropic was using this program
• 9:19
  to grant early experimental access to their mythos
• 9:22
  model to a select group of trusted global organizations.
• 9:25
  And one of those organizations was SK Telecom,
• 9:28
  which is South Korea's largest wireless carrier.
• 9:31
  Wait, South Korea is a major US ally. Why would
• 9:34
  sharing a model with their largest telecom carrier
• 9:37
  trigger an export ban? So the White House raised
• 9:39
  major concerns regarding the corporate structure
• 9:41
  behind that telecom. The administration alleges
• 9:44
  that SK Telecom's parent group has extensive,
• 9:47
  deeply embedded business ties to China, spanning
• 9:50
  across their energy, semiconductor, and industrial
• 9:53
  sectors. And compounding that anxiety, Independent
• 9:57
  researchers from Amazon recently published a
• 9:59
  paper flagging certain vulnerabilities they found
• 10:02
  in the public Fable 5 model, demonstrating that
• 10:05
  it was technically possible to bypass some of
• 10:07
  the model's safety guardrails. So the administration
• 10:09
  looks at the board. They see an advanced frontier
• 10:12
  model going to a foreign telecom with alleged
• 10:15
  ties to Chinese industry. And simultaneously,
• 10:18
  Amazon researchers are saying, hey, the public
• 10:21
  version of this software has security vulnerabilities.
• 10:23
  Right. The government's response was basically
• 10:25
  a blanket order. revoke access for all foreign
• 10:28
  nationals immediately, including foreign nationals
• 10:30
  working legally inside the United States. Which
• 10:33
  is a complete logistical nightmare for a tech
• 10:35
  company. Anthropic couldn't execute that kind
• 10:38
  of granular nationality -based access control
• 10:41
  without violating international privacy laws.
• 10:44
  Right, of course. And completely dismantling
• 10:46
  their own operational infrastructure. So, facing
• 10:50
  an impossible compliance demand, they simply
• 10:52
  pulled the plug on the models entirely. I have
• 10:54
  to ask, though. Does a blanket ban like this
• 10:57
  really make us safer? Or is it like a parent
• 11:01
  grounding the entire neighborhood from using
• 11:03
  a trampoline just because one kid might eventually
• 11:06
  invite someone over that the parent doesn't trust?
• 11:08
  That's a good analogy. I mean, it feels like
• 11:10
  a really isolationist approach to a globally
• 11:12
  connected technology. And that is the exact debate
• 11:15
  happening in diplomatic circles right now because
• 11:17
  this domestic US dispute is actively freezing
• 11:20
  Europe out of the AI race entirely. Wait, I'm
• 11:24
  struggling to see how Europe factors into a bilateral
• 11:26
  issue between a U .S. tech company and a South
• 11:29
  Korean telecom. How does the EU get caught in
• 11:32
  the crossfire? It comes down to regulatory access.
• 11:35
  The European Union's primary cybersecurity agency,
• 11:38
  known as ANISA, was actually scheduled to meet
• 11:41
  with Anthropic this week. Yeah, they had spent
• 11:44
  months negotiating to get early access to the
• 11:46
  Mythos model through that exact same Project
• 11:49
  Glasswing initiative. The EU desperately wants
• 11:52
  to understand how these frontier systems work
• 11:55
  so they can build up European cybersecurity defenses
• 11:57
  against them. But now, because of the US export
• 12:01
  block triggered by the South Korean issue, that
• 12:04
  European meeting is completely dead in the water.
• 12:06
  Precisely. It is a harsh wake -up call for Brussels.
• 12:09
  It proves to European regulators that their technological
• 12:12
  sovereignty is entirely dependent on Washington's
• 12:14
  moods. The EU does not possess a domestic equivalent
• 12:18
  to Anthropic's mythos model to test their defenses
• 12:21
  against. So an American export policy designed
• 12:24
  to counter Chinese industrial ties in South Korea
• 12:26
  is now directly dictating a European government
• 12:29
  agency's ability to protect its own digital infrastructure.
• 12:33
  That is a massive realization. And Anthropic
• 12:35
  is just caught right in the middle trying to
• 12:37
  be a trusted global partner. to European regulators,
• 12:40
  while simultaneously complying with strict, suddenly
• 12:43
  shifting directives from their own government.
• 12:45
  Which brings us to a critical breaking point.
• 12:48
  We really need to dig deeper into why the relationship
• 12:51
  between Anthropic and the administration is so
• 12:53
  heavily fractured right now, because the current
• 12:56
  deadlock revolves around a specific technical
• 12:58
  demand from the administration that reveals a
• 13:00
  fundamental misunderstanding of how artificial
• 13:03
  intelligence actually works. Yeah, so let's unpack
• 13:05
  this. The Trump administration officials are
• 13:08
  telling Anthropic that before they are allowed
• 13:10
  to re -release the Fable 5 model, they must unequivocally
• 13:14
  prove that the model's safety guard rails are
• 13:17
  completely impossible to jailbreak. Yes. Meaning,
• 13:21
  no matter what adversarial prompt a user inputs,
• 13:24
  the model will never bypass its own safety training
• 13:27
  to output malicious code or dangerous instructions.
• 13:30
  And independent cybersecurity experts across
• 13:32
  the industry are looking at this demand and stating
• 13:34
  unequivocally that it is literally impossible.
• 13:38
  Guardrails on large language models are fundamentally
• 13:40
  just stop gaps. Let's talk about the mechanism
• 13:42
  here. Why is it impossible to permanently secure
• 13:46
  an AI? Why can't you just write a rule that says,
• 13:48
  never explain how to build a bomb and hard code
• 13:51
  it into the system? Well, LLNs don't understand
• 13:54
  words the way a traditional software program
• 13:56
  understands a line of code. They map concepts
• 13:59
  in high dimensional space. Okay, what does that
• 14:01
  mean? Think of it like a massive galaxy of meaning
• 14:04
  where every concept has a mathematical coordinate.
• 14:07
  So if the government says, block all instructions
• 14:09
  for making a bomb, the AI puts a wall in front
• 14:13
  of that direct coordinate path. Right. but human
• 14:16
  language is endlessly creative. Exactly. A user
• 14:19
  can just approach that exact same concept through
• 14:21
  a semantic backdoor. They don't ask for a bomb
• 14:24
  recipe. They ask the AI to write a fictional
• 14:27
  story about a rapid exothermic chemical reaction
• 14:30
  occurring inside a confined metal space for a
• 14:34
  sci -fi novel. Oh wow. The AI traverses the high
• 14:36
  dimensional space, bypasses the blocked bomb
• 14:39
  coordinate, and arrives at the exact same dangerous
• 14:42
  information from a completely different angle.
• 14:44
  cannot patch human language. It is literally
• 14:47
  like demanding that a shipbuilder create a completely
• 14:50
  unsinkable ship before they are allowed to put
• 14:52
  it in the water. You can build watertight compartments,
• 14:54
  you can have lifeboats, you can train the crew
• 14:57
  perfectly, but you cannot guarantee it will never
• 15:00
  sink when faced with the infinite variables of
• 15:02
  the ocean. Demanding absolute Unhackable security
• 15:06
  is basically demanding that the technology never
• 15:09
  be released. And this impossible standard has
• 15:12
  led to deep frustration within Anthropic. According
• 15:15
  to reports, some Anthropic employees believe
• 15:17
  the administration is intentionally placing these
• 15:20
  impossible hurdles in front of them as a form
• 15:23
  of targeted punishment. Which stems from a backstory
• 15:25
  that unfolded earlier this year. Anthropic was
• 15:29
  in negotiations for a Department of Defense contract
• 15:31
  managed by Pete Hegseth. During those talks,
• 15:34
  Anthropic pushed back. They requested that specific
• 15:37
  use case regulations be put in place, ensuring
• 15:40
  their AI wouldn't be utilized for mass domestic
• 15:42
  surveillance or autonomous lethal targeting.
• 15:45
  And following those requests for ethical guardrails,
• 15:47
  Hegseth publicly rejected the stipulations and
• 15:50
  labeled Anthropic a supply chain risk. So we
• 15:52
  have a documented history of friction there.
• 15:55
  The company wanted specific restrictions on military
• 15:57
  implementation. The government pushed back on
• 16:00
  those demands and slapped a risk label on the
• 16:02
  company. And now we have this geopolitical standoff
• 16:05
  over a technical demand that experts say can't
• 16:08
  ever be perfectly solved. It is incredibly messy,
• 16:11
  but you know. Amidst all this high -level geopolitical
• 16:14
  panic and impossible regulation, there is actually
• 16:17
  an incredible silver lining for working professionals
• 16:20
  right now. Yes. While Washington is treating
• 16:23
  AI like a locked vault, everyday professionals
• 16:26
  are currently treating it like a junior intern.
• 16:28
  This is the part of the deep dive that I find
• 16:30
  absolutely fascinating because Anthropic just
• 16:33
  released a massive study analyzing 400 ,000 user
• 16:37
  sessions with their Claude code agent. Yeah.
• 16:39
  and the data completely shatters how we think
• 16:41
  about the value of AI in the workplace. They
• 16:44
  looked at how complex programming work is split
• 16:46
  between the human user and the AI agent, and
• 16:49
  the findings were totally counterintuitive. What
• 16:51
  did they find? They discovered that lawyers,
• 16:53
  middle managers, and research scientists, people
• 16:55
  with absolutely zero software coding background,
• 16:59
  were performing almost as well as professional,
• 17:02
  highly trained software engineers when they used
• 17:04
  these AI coding agents. The non -technical users
• 17:07
  were finishing complex tasks within just seven
• 17:10
  points of the professional engineers. Yeah. What
• 17:13
  the data proves is that a user's domain expertise,
• 17:16
  their deep, nuanced knowledge of corporate law
• 17:19
  or molecular biology or supply chain management,
• 17:23
  matters far more than their actual coding expertise
• 17:26
  when leveraging AI. I really want to emphasize
• 17:29
  this to you listening right now. If you have
• 17:31
  been worried about being left behind because
• 17:33
  you don't know Python or C++ EF, your specific
• 17:36
  industry knowledge is actually your greatest
• 17:39
  superpower in this new economy. It really is.
• 17:41
  It's like having a universal translator, but
• 17:43
  for pure logic. A great lawyer already knows
• 17:45
  the exact, rigorous logical steps required to
• 17:48
  win a case or structure a contract. They just
• 17:50
  don't know the programming syntax to build a
• 17:52
  software tool to automate it. The AI agent bridges
• 17:55
  that gap. It takes your pure domain logic and
• 17:59
  translates it into executable code. It perfectly
• 18:01
  echoes a recent joint study from Harvard on perplexity.
• 18:04
  AI agents aren't just making people type faster
• 18:07
  or draft emails quicker. They are allowing professionals
• 18:10
  to tackle massive cross -disciplinary problems
• 18:13
  that previously required an entire department
• 18:16
  of specialists. That's incredible. The value
• 18:18
  of the AI isn't capped by the model's processing
• 18:20
  parameters. It is capped by how well the human
• 18:23
  user understands the fundamental problem they
• 18:25
  are trying to solve. So the human is the architect,
• 18:29
  bringing the vision and the structural logic.
• 18:31
  The AI is just the construction crew swinging
• 18:34
  the hammers. It is an incredibly empowering shift
• 18:37
  for non -technical professionals. Before we wrap
• 18:39
  up, a quick thanks to Old Glory, an iconic music
• 18:42
  and sports fan merch store. Perfect for the techie
• 18:45
  in your life. Use promo code SNARFL for 15 %
• 18:48
  off at oldglory .com. So bringing all these threads
• 18:51
  together, the AI boom is clearly not just some
• 18:54
  abstract concept happening in a server farm out
• 18:56
  in the desert somewhere. It is incredibly tangible
• 18:59
  and reshaping the physical world. It is directly
• 19:02
  raising the price of the next smartphone you're
• 19:04
  going to buy because of the sheer physical limitations
• 19:06
  of hardware memory. And it is simultaneously
• 19:09
  creating massive diplomatic friction, putting
• 19:12
  the United States at odds with European regulators
• 19:15
  and international telecom giants over who gets
• 19:18
  to control the most powerful digital frameworks
• 19:21
  in the world. And at the exact same time is sitting
• 19:24
  quietly on your laptop right now, empowering
• 19:27
  you to execute the work of a seasoned software
• 19:30
  engineer. even if you've never written a single
• 19:33
  line of code in your entire life. Yeah. It is
• 19:36
  a technology defined by its massive contradictions.
• 19:39
  It is deemed too expensive to manufacture cheaply,
• 19:42
  yet incredibly accessible to the end user. It
• 19:45
  is considered too dangerous and unpredictable
• 19:47
  to export, yet it is currently revolutionizing
• 19:50
  mundane daily office work across the globe. Which
• 19:54
  leaves us with a really fascinating thought to
• 19:55
  ponder as we close out today. If the government
• 19:58
  is demanding absolute perfect security from AI
• 20:01
  before we are allowed to use it globally, but
• 20:04
  regular people are already using it to completely
• 20:06
  revolutionize their daily jobs right now, who
• 20:08
  really gets to decide when the future is safe
• 20:10
  enough to release? We're here to help at SNARFL,
• 20:13
  so reach out on our website if you have any more
• 20:14
  questions. That's a wrap on today's top stories.
• 20:21
  Remember, tech doesn't have to be complicated,
• 20:23
  and we're here to help connect the dots. If you've
• 20:26
  got questions or want to learn more, visit us
• 20:29
  at snarful .com. Thanks for listening, and we'll
• 20:32
  catch you next time.